Jail bosses vetoed 187 inmates deemed eligible, considering them to be “an immediate risk of harm” to an individual or group.
Prison governors blocked nearly half of all inmates set to be freed early under a government scheme, ruling them too high risk new figures have revealed.
The Scottish Prison Service released 286 prisoners from November 11 and December 13 to ease the overcrowding crisis.
However jail bosses vetoed 40 per cent – equivalent to 187 inmates – deemed eligible after considering them to be “an immediate risk of harm” to an individual or group.
In spite of this, 127 of the 286 freed had convictions for violent offences – or 44 per cent, the largest share of the total, data shows.
It comes as plans going through Parliament would slash the automatic release point to 30 per cent for sentences under four years.Critics fear the move could effectively scrap the prison governor’s veto.
As the veto applies only to emergency early release schemes, governors would be powerless to stop offenders being freed once they reach 30 per cent.
Scots Tory justice spokesman Liam Kerr said: “The Justice Secretary must start paying attention to victims, to prison governors and realise this situation presents yet more risks to community safety.”
SPS data shows 75 (26 per cent) of those released in November had convictions for crimes including drug offences, weapons possession and bail violations.
Short-term offenders walked free after serving 50 per cent of their sentence, until it fell to 40 per cent in February last year.
If passed, the change to 30 per cent will come into force in May, a month after the end of the emergency early release programme.
It is limited to those serving less than four years and excludes sex offenders, domestic abusers or terrorists.
Rob Hay, president of the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents said: “A declining prison population cannot be heralded as a success if it means a rise in crime and more victims.”
The Scottish Government said: “The governor’s veto remains in place – we have no intention of changing that.”





