On the latest episode of the Daily Mail’s Deep Dive podcast, political editor James Tapsfield explains why he’s unconvinced by Andy Burnham‘s cabinet and the economics of the new Prime Minister’s ‘feel good’ giveaways.
This week, Burnham officially became Britain’s seventh Prime Minister in a decade, promising his government would be a ‘circuit breaker’ from the political turmoil that has gripped Westminster since the Brexit vote in 2016.
The former Greater Manchester Mayor has spent his first days in charge shoring up what he claims will be a ‘cost of living government’, announcing a new-look Cabinet and a flurry of measures designed to save the public money.
Speaking to columnist Robert Hardman, Tapsfield revealed his scepticism over several of Burnham’s first moves as Prime Minister – from the ‘risky’ return of Louise Haigh, to doubts over whether Ed Miliband has what it takes to be Britain’s Foreign Secretary.
On the latest episode of Deep Dive, James Tapsfield explains why he’s unconvinced by Andy Burnham’s cabinet and the economics of the new Prime Minister’s ‘feel good’ giveaways
The former Greater Manchester Mayor has spent his first days in charge shoring up what he claims will be a ‘ cost of living government’
‘I am not convinced that Ed Miliband is the person you’d want as your chief diplomat’, Tapsfield told Deep Dive.
‘It’s not really his core skill set, looking natural and chatting to people. He often looks like an alien wearing human skin when you put him in front of a camera. He has strange mannerisms and slight gurning habits.
‘He could have a lot of trouble with the US administration, particularly Donald Trump because of his net zero background.
‘He’s big friends with Gavin Newsom, who is not Trump’s favourite person. Ed was known not to be very happy with the Iran war, where we let the US use our airbases.’
Burnham’s first concrete policy announcements, cutting VAT on domestic energy bills, capping bus fares at £2, slashing business rates for pubs and live music venues, and a pledge to end rough sleeping, have also been greeted with some head-scratching.
The government says these changes are funded by reallocating money from scrapped or reviewed programmes, from Starmer’s digital ID scheme to tax reliefs for other businesses, but critics say they still can’t see where the money is really coming from.
Almost immediately after Burnham announced the £45-a-year saving on energy bills, Starmer loyalist Darren Jones took to social media to point out that funding for the digital ID scheme, which was supposedly paying for it, had never actually been costed.
While acknowledging it was politically savvy to start his premiership on a more optimistic note, Tapsfield warned that Burnham risks showing the markets and public he is not fiscally prudent.
‘They are aiming for a kind of blitz of feel-good things’, he argued.
‘I am not convinced that Ed Miliband is the person you’d want as your chief diplomat’, Tapsfield told Deep Dive
‘To show that positive things are being done for you, with everyone struggling with the cost of living. They’ve looked back and seen how Starmer and Reeves went wrong by saying how miserable everything was to start.
‘Sadly, he’s got no money left… rough sleeping, that seems to be coming from existing budgets. There’s no new funding really.
‘We’ve had a bus fare cap, which Burnham was very proud of doing in Manchester. Again, the funding for that is about £450 million and that’s fallen slightly to pieces.
‘They said they were going to change from giving out grants to developing countries for climate projects, and instead making them loans.
‘Heidi Alexander, the Transport minister, admitted that the detail on that has yet to be worked out.
‘Essentially, they’re borrowing more money to fund some of these little give-aways and hoping they’ll get some early momentum from it.’
Listen to Tapsfield’s full analysis of Burnham’s first days in charge by searching for Deep Dive, wherever you get your podcasts.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login