Inspectors from the Care Quality Commission (CQC) have improved the rating for child and adolescent mental health wards (CAMHS), run by Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, from requires improvement to good.

It follows an inspection carried out on October 28 and 29 last year.

The wards inspected were at Mill Lodge, off Huntington Road in York, and Red Kite View, in Leeds. Mill Lodge is a 10-bed general adolescent ward while Red Kite View contains two wards, a 16-bed general adolescent unit and a separate six bed Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).

CQC said it found a breach of regulation in safe care and treatment when managing medicines and completing mandatory training at the trust.

Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust has been told to submit a plan showing what action it is taking in response to these concerns, the watchdog added.

The trust’s overall CQC rating remains good.

Inspectors said trust leaders had “not ensured” all staff at the CAMHS service were trained in safeguarding to keep people safe.

But they said the trust had “plans in place to ensure all staff were trained after the inspection”.

Trust has ‘made improvements’ to service after CQC raised concern, says watchdog

CQC said service staff “didn’t consistently follow good practice with regards to medicines management, including how it was given to people and records showing what they’d been given”.

However, CQC said it found that the trust “had made improvements to the service” since its 2024 inspection, when the watchdog concluded that the service was “not performing as well as it should”.

Recommended reading:

Inspectors said individual care plans at the service were developed, regularly reviewed and updated after their most recent inspection.

They found that staff “worked well across different teams to help support people” and “treated people with compassion and kindness and respected their privacy and dignity”, according to CQC.

The watchdog also said inspectors found that staff at the service “understood their individual needs and supported them to understand and manage their care, treatment or condition”.

CQC added that the “service supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support”.

Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust has been approached for comment.

Community groups, businesses, charities and schools have until Friday, April 10 to apply for support for schemes that make it safer and easier for people to walk, wheel and cycle.

David Skaith, the Mayor of York and North Yorkshire, launched the £1 million Active Travel Fund to support projects in the region that improve walking routes and increase accessibility.

Recommended reads:

These can include initiatives such as installing dropped kerbs, building skills and confidence through cycle training or creating safe spaces to learn, encouraging behaviour change – such as School Streets, bike buses and park and stride schemes; and providing secure cycle storage.

Mr Skaith said: “Walking, wheeling and cycling should be part of a safer, happier school run.

“It’s fun, it’s healthy, and it’s precious quality time for children at the start and end of the day.

“That’s why I’m kick-starting a revolution in active travel. Through the Mayor’s Active Travel Fund, I’m putting power into the hands of local people to create safer routes to build healthier, greener, and better connected places for generations to come.

“We’re backing communities with this £1 million investment, supporting practical, local initiatives that make a real difference on our streets and outside our school gates.”

The funding forms part of a wider £4 million programme to double investment in walking, wheeling and cycling across the region.

More than £2 million is already available to public bodies, including local councils, with successful applications due to be announced in the next few weeks.

The Mayor launched the fund at Oatlands Junior School in Harrogate, where a range of measures has led to more than 90 per cent of children walking, wheeling or cycling to school.

These include a bike library, park and stride, 20mph speed limits and regular Dr Bike sessions to keep cycles in top condition.

Rhiannon Letman-Wade, active travel commissioner for York and North Yorkshire, said: “The schemes running in Harrogate are exactly the kind of projects we want to see more of across the region.

“They show how a community can secure much-needed improvements and create safer streets for children and the wider community.

“This fund is about empowering communities to take the lead, supported by targeted investment, so that together we can provide opportunities for people across our city, towns, rural and coastal areas to make more affordable and sustainable travel choices.”

For details and an application form, visit yorknorthyorks-ca.gov.uk/project/mayors-active-travel-fund/

The Active Travel Fund is part of the Mayor’s £7 million Moving Forward campaign to create a healthier and more thriving York and North Yorkshire through investment in schemes that support movement, health and connection to the outdoors.

What do you think?

Feel strongly about an issue? Write us a letter. Please write no more than 250 words and you must provide your full name, address and mobile number. Send your views by email to: letters@thepress.co.uk

Four years ago, on February 24 2022, Russian president Vladimir Putin announced that his forces had begun a full-scale invasion of Ukraine – the reasons for which we have explored here. Within minutes, explosions were heard in major Ukrainian cities as Russian troops flooded across the border.

Russian forces made swift gains, capturing key areas near the capital of Kyiv. But the offensive soon stalled and, by December, Russia had been forced to withdraw its forces and consolidate in the east where the war has ground on ever since.

We asked Stefan Wolff, Tetyana Malyarenko, Scott Lucas and Mark Webber, four regular contributors to the Conversation UK’s coverage of Ukraine, for their take on the most surprising development of the war so far and its likely trajectory from here.

A very traditional war – with added drones

Stefan Wolff, Professor of International Security, University of Birmingham; Tetyana Malyarenko, Professor of International Security, and Jean Monnet, Professor of European Security, National University Odesa Law Academy

For us, the most surprising development remains Moscow’s decision to launch a large-scale ground invasion of Ukraine in the first place. Even though many Russian and western analysts expected a swift Ukrainian defeat, this always seemed unlikely from the perspective of Ukraine.

The mobilisation of Ukrainian society early on in the war testified to this and underlined that there was no realistic scenario under which the Kremlin could swiftly achieve its goals – to oust President Volodymyr Zelensky and “demilitarise” and “denazify” Ukraine.

Much less surprising was Russia’s transition to a war economy and a traditional war of attrition, which became a foregone conclusion as soon as Moscow’s plan for a victory parade in Kyiv within weeks of the full-scale invasion turned out to be a pipe dream.

Combat methods have evolved over the past four years, especially regarding the integration of drones. Russia has exploited drone technology to attack the whole range of critical infrastructure in Ukraine, not just military targets. But the foundation of Russian and then Soviet military doctrine – the use of mass armies and tactics of mass destruction – has remained untouched.

Moving forward, both sides have sufficient resources and external support to maintain the status quo. They will continue to fight each other in the hope of exhausting their opponent. But neither side is likely to reach this point of exhaustion soon. And until it does happen, political, economic and social stagnation in both Russia and Ukraine will continue to take its toll on their citizens.

Putin’s hopes are pinned on Trump

Scott Lucas, Professor of International Politics, University College Dublin

On the day the war broke out, I was in a discussion group of political and military analysts. When we got the news that Russian special forces had landed at the Hostomel airbase near Kyiv, each of us thought the capital would fall within a few weeks.

However, four years have passed and Ukraine now controls more territory than it did in June 2022. This is despite facing the second-most powerful military in the world, Russia’s disinformation assault and political warfare trying to split Europe, and abandonment by the Trump camp.

The Russian president’s unwillingness to give up his quest for Ukraine as part of a “Greater Russia” and the Trump camp’s willingness to sacrifice Ukrainian and European security are less of a surprise.

Putin made clear in an essay in 2021 that this would be his legacy project. So any soundbites about “peace around the corner” – particularly from Trump’s envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner – are cynical declarations or wishful thinking.

The Kremlin will not accept less than the seizure of all of the strategic Donetsk region, the rest of the country without effective security guarantees, and the fall of the Zelensky government. Putin cannot accept less because this would be the failure of his project at the cost of 1.3 million casualties and counting.

His hope is that Trump’s envoys will enable him to achieve what he cannot on the battlefield. The Trumpists do not believe in alliance but in transactional relationships, which is why the Kremlin is now dangling joint economic projects in front of the US government.

But, irrespective of this, I see no change in the war’s trajectory in the near future. A negotiated end to the invasion is close to impossible because of the Kremlin’s quest for “victory” through Kyiv’s capitulation. That capitulation is unlikely.

Russia has made only marginal advances on the ground. And Zelensky is maintaining his line over sovereignty, territory and security. Although Ukraine’s energy infrastructure has been seriously damaged, most Ukrainians support continued resistance.

While cumbersome in its support, which has been complicated by pro-Kremlin figures like Hungary’s Viktor Orbán and Slovakia’s Robert Fico, the EU is also stepping up its backing of Kyiv and partially filling the gap that has been left by Trump.

The Kremlin is facing a tightening of economic constraints on its quest. It is cutting social spending and increasing taxes to maintain the war. However, as there has been no widespread public pressure domestically that could curb the Kremlin’s ambitions, the invasion will grind on.

Two ways to overcome the stalemate

Mark Webber, Professor of International Politics, University of Birmingham

For me, the biggest surprise so far has been the resilience and adaptability of the Ukrainian war effort. Most observers, myself included, assumed in 2022 that the Ukrainians would buckle under the Russian onslaught.

Nato-led training programmes have undoubtedly been important for Ukrainian defenders. But seemingly more vital has been the determination provided by national identity. Putin’s 2022 claims that Ukraine had been committing genocide against Russian speakers and that its government was a neo-Nazi dictatorship were both spurious and counterproductive.

I too believe Russia’s war methods in Ukraine were grimly predictable. Waves of infantry assaults designed to overwhelm defences through sheer volume have been a recurring strategy in previous Russian military campaigns in Chechnya, Georgia and Syria.

But this strategy has resulted in a stalemate in Ukraine with the frontlines effectively frozen. There are two things that could alter this. The first is a change of approach by China, which has effectively subsidised Russia’s war effort through technology transfers and energy purchases.

Beijing could cut off some of the technology it provides Russia and exert pressure on Moscow to encourage flexibility in the peace negotiations. But, at present, it has no interest in abandoning Russia. Their alliance is a way of balancing the US and Nato in the global competition for influence.

The second possible agent of change is a massive armament effort on behalf of Ukraine. This would require Germany, France and Britain to boost already significant arms provisions and to allow their use in a manner that is not constrained by fears of escalation.

However, this scenario also seems unlikely. These three countries lack the domestic political imperative to back Ukraine to victory. And the US, which was overly cautious even under the presidency of Joe Biden, has now left the field of battle.

Andrei Lankov, a prominent Russian scholar on North Korea who teaches at a Seoul university, was detained in Latvia while delivering a lecture, Russian media reported.

Mr Lankov confirmed to multiple news agencies that he was detained by Latvian police just minutes before delivering a lecture on North Korea and placed on a blacklist by the country’s authorities.

Mr Lankov said police officers took him to an immigration office and then placed him in a car that took him to the border with Estonia. He was eventually expelled from the country.

At around 11pm Moscow time, Mr Lankov said that he was still being held, adding that lawyers were working on his case and friends were helping with logistics.

“About thirty minutes before the event, police and immigration came and told me that the foreign ministry of Latvia included me on its list of undesirable people,” he told NK News.

While Latvian authorities haven’t issued an official clarification, Me Lankov believes it could be related to his views on North Korea. “I believe they see my writing style as excessively objective and they see it as a problem,” he said. “I say positive things about North Korea sometimes, and when negative, not in a hysterical style.”

Officials at South Korea’s Kookmin University, where Lankov is a professor of history, said they were trying to assess the situation.

Mr Lankov’s lawyer later confirmed that the scholar was blacklisted from the country, however, the designation didn’t prevent him from entering the country, according to the Russian Anti-War Committee.

“Overall everything is fairly clear. The authorities do not like the fact that I refuse to turn real-life situations into politically convenient caricatures,” the scholar said in a post on Telegram.

A native of Leningrad, now called St Petersburg, Mr Lankov lived for years in North Korea as an exchange student in the 1980s and has studied the country throughout his career. In the 1990s, he worked in South Korea and Australia, and since 2004 has taught in Seoul. He holds dual Russian and Australian citizenship.

Mr Lankov has been known for his realist view of North Korea, which he often describes as a Machiavellian regime squeezing limited resources and manipulating major powers to ensure its survival. He has also expressed critical views of Russia’s war in Ukraine and Moscow’s use of North Korean troops to sustain its campaign.

In April 2025, a court in Moscow reportedly fined him 10,000 rubles (£92) for taking part in the activities of an organisation that had been recognised as “undesirable” in Russia. Mr Lankov told RBK at the time that he learned about the case from journalists.

PC Steve Newman sent a message to the fellow officer “out of the blue” in the early hours saying he wanted to have “pure sweaty, breathtakingly great sex” with her in October 2023.

A misconduct hearing at Houghton Le Spring Police Station ruled his comments were inappropriate and amounted to sexual harassment.

A month later at a Northumbria Police work Christmas party he started to make complimentary comments about her to another colleague who she was dating, then “took hold of the back of [her] head, pulled her towards [him], and kissed her on the forehead”.

The woman, who is referred to only as Officer A, said she was left “shocked” PC Newman had texted her in the early hours of the morning making “sexually explicit suggestions out of the blue”.

She told the hearing she “could not believe the audacity” of PC Newman, adding she “would not touch [him] with a bargepole”.

Officer A stated her relationship with PC Newman was “strictly work based” and the pair did not see each other outside of it.

She told the three-day hearing how on October 30, 2024, Newman had approached her at work asking if she was attending the Christmas party. He then asked if she had a partner within the police force, which she did not want to disclose. When PC Newman went to leave, she said he turned and shouted across the room, “Well, I’ll book a taxi early so that we can go back to yours”.

Officer A said she saw this as a sexual advance and felt “mortified” and “wanted the ground to swallow [her] up.”

While at the Christmas party a month later, Officer A said Newman approached her and her partner on the dance floor, saying “you look lovely in your dress”, which made her feel “very uncomfortable”.

The hearing heard how Newman then grabbed Officer A around the back of the head and kissed her on the forehead.

The woman said she was “disgusted” by his behaviour, and that Newman had “sexually assaulted [her] in front of [her] partner.”

She said the events with Newman had emotionally impacted her and her career.

PC Newman told the hearing that he “thought he had a friendship” with the woman, and that she had previously “confided in him” about personal information.

He also said he was a “very huggy person”, who would greet colleagues with “hello, you’re looking handsome” or “all reet bonny lass”. 

During the hearing, he accepted the content of the message was sent “to see if there was any interest in anything purely sexual”.

PC Newman also said he sent it because “shy bairns get nowt”.

He said he kissed Officer A on the forehead as he is “very huggy with both male and female friends.”

He also admitted in evidence that he did have a sexual interest in Officer A, had always been attracted to her, and he was “testing the waters”.

The panel stated the case was of a high seriousness, and his actions amounted to sexual harassment.

It said immediate dismissal without notice was the only proportionate sanction.

PC Newman will also be placed on the College of Policing’s barred list.

Democrat Rep. Al Green held up a sign reading “black people aren’t apes” as Trump gave his State of the Union speech

Donald Trump faced a powerful protest as he delivered his State of the Union address this evening, with a placard declaring “black people aren’t apes” confronting him.

Democratic Representative Al Green brandished the sign as Donald Trump entered the House of Representatives chamber for the yearly speech to a joint congressional session tonight. He was subsequently removed from the chamber during proceedings, reports the Mirror..

Rep. Green was ejected from Trump’s joint address to Congress the previous year after shouting at the President in opposition to Medicaid reductions.

Ensure our latest stories always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.

This year’s demonstration relates to footage Trump shared on his Truth Social platform earlier this month, which portrayed Barack and Michelle Obama as apes. Trump maintained he hadn’t viewed the entire video before directing an assistant to publish it on his account.

Several Democratic congresswomen turned up to the address dressed in ‘suffragist’ white to demonstrate solidarity with women’s rights.

Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández of New Mexico, who leads Democratic Women’s Caucus, told CBS News: “This year, there are specific attacks on women’s ability to vote. The Democratic Women’s Caucus is wearing white both to honor that fight that women have always had and to signal we are still in the fight.”

Certain members of Congress are boycotting this evening’s address, following guidance from Democratic leadership encouraging them to absent themselves rather than create disruption through attention-seeking protests.

Trump enters the State of the Union facing the most damaging approval figures of any president in recent memory. A Washington Post/ABC News survey this week revealed 60% of Americans expressed dissatisfaction with Trump’s performance – with 47% registering strong disapproval.

A mere 39% voiced approval of his work, marking the weakest rating for any President approaching a second-year State of the Union in contemporary times.

Trump’s disapproval last touched 60% in the immediate aftermath of the January 6th Insurrection during the closing days of his initial presidency.

Scarcely 29% of Americans believe the nation is progressing positively, the latest AP-NORC survey indicates. The majority, 69%, reckon matters are deteriorating.

This gloom exceeds levels recorded when Trump assumed office last year. Last March, roughly 6 in 10 Americans felt the country was moving in the wrong direction.

That’s partly down to Republicans’ outlook becoming considerably bleaker last autumn, following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Whilst Republicans have regained some optimism in recent months, only around six in 10 now believe the country is on the right track, compared with approximately seven in 10 last March.

The ‘Lost Feather’ is a bird’s-nest-inspired structure is aiming to be a UK-first mass experience with more than 250 birds.

Birds will perform across the arena, which is being developed by leading avian specialists and will also include a lake and a hillside stage. It is part of Kynren’s Storied Lands theme park, which is set to open this year.

Anna Warnecke, the chief executive of Kynren, said: “The Lost Feather represents one of the boldest creative statements we have ever made.

“What is now rising from the ground is more than an arena – it is a space designed to move people emotionally and leave a lasting impression.”

An artist’s impression of the arena. (Image: KYNREN)

The project comes with a focus on educating the audience about conservation and the relationship between humans and birds.

The production plans to increase public understanding of the need to protect bird species both locally and globally.

Timber has arrived for the next stage in the construction of Kynren – The Storied Lands. (Image: North News & Pictures Ltd)

Kynren’s theme park is currently under construction in Bishop Auckland. (Image: KYNREN)

With their experience in conservation organisations and free-flight programmes, the specialists are ensuring the attraction is more than just a performance space.

The Lost Feather will form part of Phase One of The Storied Lands.

The extension will also host other live-action shows, including a medieval horse show, a Viking show, and ‘Legend of the Wear’, a retelling of the Lambton Worm myth.

In just over eight months, voters will pass judgement on Trump’s second presidential term in November’s midterm elections. They could preserve his Republican majority in Congress or hand power to the Democrats, assuring two years of legislative gridlock and aggressive oversight that could, in his own words, see him impeached once again.