It’s a love story, and Donald Trump just couldn’t say yes. 

The President, from his seat aboard Air Force One traveling to South Dakota, launched a fresh troll job at Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce just minutes after they tied the knot at Madison Square Garden, New York City.

The White House‘s official X page shared an image of the pink billboards outside the arena that the couple used to announce their nuptials, with the AI-edited message ‘Trump is your president’. 

Swift and Kelce announced their marriage on Friday night by flashing ‘JUST&T MARRIED!’ across the billboard in front of MSG. 

‘IT’S HAPPENED!!!’, the White House said in their post shortly after the couple tied the knot inside the arena. 

Hollywood actor and comedian Adam Sandler officiated the ceremony in front of 1,000 guests, who poured into the Big Apple for the extravaganza. 

The White House appeared to cash in on the hype surrounding the highly secretive event by sharing an image of Trump in a poster similar to Swift’s ‘Eras Tour’.

Instead of the superstar, however, it contained pictures of Trump, as well as former presidents George Washington and Abraham Lincoln.

Trump boarding Air Force One on Friday night just before the two wed 

‘It’s been a long time coming…,’ the post on X was captioned, a nod at Swift’s line used to promote her tour. 

Trump’s Friday night meme jab was just the latest moment in a long history of bad blood between the president and the superstar singer. 

Despite posting niceties about Swift around 2012 when she was selected to co-host the Grammys nomination special and even cheering her on after her breakup with Conor Kennedy, Trump lashed out at the mega star once she waded into politics.

In 2018, during the midterms of Trump’s first term, Swift endorsed the Democratic opponent to Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn.

Swift had said that Senator Blackburn was just ‘Trump in a wig.’

Once Trump caught wind of her dig, he told reporters at the time: ‘Let’s just say I like Taylor’s music about 25 percent less now, okay?’

Years later, when pressed on Swift’s relationship with Kelce, Trump threw some shade at the couple.

‘I wish the best for both of them,’ he said. ‘I hope they enjoy their life, maybe together, maybe not — most likely not.’

In 2024 during the presidential campaign, he declared that there was ‘no way’ Swift could endorse Biden since Trump ‘was responsible for the Music Modernization Act for Taylor Swift and all other Musical Artists.’

One of the billboards that announced their marriage is seen here 

The couple are seen here in May of this year in New York City

Swift later went on to endorse former Vice President Kamala Harris, shocking Trump, who wrote on social media soon after: ‘I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!’

In the summer of 2025, he piled on the singer again while praising actress Sydney Sweeney.

‘Just look at Woke singer Taylor Swift,’ Trump wrote. ‘Ever since I alerted the world as to what she was by saying on TRUTH that I can’t stand her (HATE!) She was booed out of the Super Bowl and became, NO LONGER HOT.’

‘Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the ‘HOTTEST’ ad out there,’ Trump noted.

Though when asked about Kelce and Swift’s engagement in August 2025, the President softened his tone.

‘I think he’s a great player, I think he’s a great guy, and I think that she’s a terrific person, so I wish them a lot of luck.’

The reminder from the White House comes as Trump travels to Mount Rushmore aboard Air Force One to kick off America’s 250th Birthday festivities. 

The event is part of the Trumpified celebration of America’s 250th birthday, organized by Freedom 250, the group that Trump created by executive order in January 2025 to take control of the country’s 250th birthday party. 

It’s a love story, and Donald Trump just couldn’t say yes. 

The President, from his seat aboard Air Force One traveling to South Dakota, launched a fresh troll job at Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce just minutes after they tied the knot at Madison Square Garden, New York City.

The White House‘s official X page shared an image of the pink billboards outside the arena that the couple used to announce their nuptials, with the AI-edited message ‘Trump is your president’. 

Swift and Kelce announced their marriage on Friday night by flashing ‘JUST&T MARRIED!’ across the billboard in front of MSG. 

‘IT’S HAPPENED!!!’, the White House said in their post shortly after the couple tied the knot inside the arena. 

Hollywood actor and comedian Adam Sandler officiated the ceremony in front of 1,000 guests, who poured into the Big Apple for the extravaganza. 

The White House appeared to cash in on the hype surrounding the highly secretive event by sharing an image of Trump in a poster similar to Swift’s ‘Eras Tour’.

Instead of the superstar, however, it contained pictures of Trump, as well as former presidents George Washington and Abraham Lincoln.

Trump boarding Air Force One on Friday night just before the two wed 

‘It’s been a long time coming…,’ the post on X was captioned, a nod at Swift’s line used to promote her tour. 

Trump’s Friday night meme jab was just the latest moment in a long history of bad blood between the president and the superstar singer. 

Despite posting niceties about Swift around 2012 when she was selected to co-host the Grammys nomination special and even cheering her on after her breakup with Conor Kennedy, Trump lashed out at the mega star once she waded into politics.

In 2018, during the midterms of Trump’s first term, Swift endorsed the Democratic opponent to Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn.

Swift had said that Senator Blackburn was just ‘Trump in a wig.’

Once Trump caught wind of her dig, he told reporters at the time: ‘Let’s just say I like Taylor’s music about 25 percent less now, okay?’

Years later, when pressed on Swift’s relationship with Kelce, Trump threw some shade at the couple.

‘I wish the best for both of them,’ he said. ‘I hope they enjoy their life, maybe together, maybe not — most likely not.’

In 2024 during the presidential campaign, he declared that there was ‘no way’ Swift could endorse Biden since Trump ‘was responsible for the Music Modernization Act for Taylor Swift and all other Musical Artists.’

One of the billboards that announced their marriage is seen here 

The couple are seen here in May of this year in New York City

Swift later went on to endorse former Vice President Kamala Harris, shocking Trump, who wrote on social media soon after: ‘I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!’

In the summer of 2025, he piled on the singer again while praising actress Sydney Sweeney.

‘Just look at Woke singer Taylor Swift,’ Trump wrote. ‘Ever since I alerted the world as to what she was by saying on TRUTH that I can’t stand her (HATE!) She was booed out of the Super Bowl and became, NO LONGER HOT.’

‘Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the ‘HOTTEST’ ad out there,’ Trump noted.

Though when asked about Kelce and Swift’s engagement in August 2025, the President softened his tone.

‘I think he’s a great player, I think he’s a great guy, and I think that she’s a terrific person, so I wish them a lot of luck.’

The reminder from the White House comes as Trump travels to Mount Rushmore aboard Air Force One to kick off America’s 250th Birthday festivities. 

The event is part of the Trumpified celebration of America’s 250th birthday, organized by Freedom 250, the group that Trump created by executive order in January 2025 to take control of the country’s 250th birthday party. 

Sausages are a staple in many households, but cooking them can be a bit tricky. Here’s how to ensure they’re perfectly crispy and juicy every time using one simple method.

Sausages can be savoured at breakfast as part of a full English fry-up, in a muffin sandwich, or at dinner alongside mash, or even as a hot dog during barbecue season. Like most people, you might believe you already know the proper technique for cooking sausages. You’ve been preparing them for years and are perfectly satisfied with the outcome.

While it may seem simple enough to chuck them in a frying pan or slide them into the oven, sausages contain a significant amount of moisture, which can cause them to burst quite readily.

A frequent error many people make is cooking sausages on a high heat, which generates steam inside the meat and causes it to split.

This leads to the loss of precious juices and flavour, leaving you with unappetising, soggy sausages. Fortunately, the professionals at William J. Walter have offered a simple solution to guarantee your sausages stay tasty and succulent throughout cooking.

Advertisement

Rather than placing sausages straight into a scorching frying pan or preheated oven, the sausage-making specialists recommend following one straightforward technique first – blanching.

They said: “We suggest blanching the sausages before frying or baking them so that they remain tender and juicier.”

The initial step is to bring water to the boil in a saucepan, then add your sausages and reduce the heat.

Simmer for five minutes for smoked sausages and 10 minutes for fresh regular sausages.

Then prepare your sausages however you prefer: in a pan, in the oven, or on the barbecue. They should only require 10 minutes to cook in the oven, and three to five minutes in the frying pan and barbecue.

It might appear odd, but blanching sausages enables them to cook gradually, guaranteeing that both the casing and the interior are cooked uniformly at the same time.

By blanching sausages in advance, the skin contracts, stopping them from splitting during cooking, and it substantially reduces the chance of charring.

Consequently, you’ll have sausages that are not only ideally crispy but also far more flavoursome, as all the juices and fat stay locked inside the skin.

Many people boost the flavour of the water by incorporating seasonings such as a chicken stock cube, which considerably enhances the taste and produces sausages that are much more intense.

Tallulah Bradford, 18, died after being struck by a vehicle in Southend

Advertisement

The devastated loved ones of a teenage girl have paid an emotional tribute, saying the loss of her “beautiful soul” has left “a hole in many hearts”.

On Saturday, June 13, emergency services rushed to Chalkwell Park in Southend following reports that a group of individuals had taken unauthorised control of a small articulated loading vehicle. Tallulah Bradford, 18, was struck by the vehicle and heartbreakingly passed away days later on June 19.

Her distraught mother described the youngster as a “beautiful soul”, reports Essex Live.

In a moving statement, she said: “Tallulah was not only a daughter to me, she was the bestest friend. She was an amazing sister, granddaughter, niece and cousin and was loved by all who knew her.

“She was a beautiful, hardworking, fun and outgoing young girl. Tallulah always lived her best life, had a beautiful soul and life will never be the same without her.”

“Losing Tallulah has left a hole in many hearts that could never be filled but we will forever be grateful for the memories we have made with her. We will miss her eternally.

“We would like to thank the emergency services who cared for Tallulah when she needed it the most.”

Tallulah’s closest friend, Macie, also offered a heartfelt tribute to the teenager.

She said: “Tallulah was more than just a friend to me, she was my best friend who had been by my side since we met at school at the age of five. Growing up we shared so many secrets, laughter, good times and memories that will be cherished for a lifetime.

“Her craziness and beautiful spirit will stay with me forever and I’m grateful to have had her by my side. She will always be deeply missed and never be forgotten. Love you always, be the brightest star in the sky.”

Her mate Shannon also remarked: “Tallulah was kind-hearted, caring, generous and most of all the biggest diva. She wasn’t just a friend to me, she was like a sister.

“I wouldn’t be the person I am today if it wasn’t for her. She will forever be missed and loved. I’ll forever cherish every memory that we have together and we will make sure she is forever remembered as the special girl she was.”

Another close friend Mya commented: “Tallulah was more than my best friend, she was family. Thank you for filling my life with laughter and unforgettable memories.

“Her kindness, strength, and beautiful spirit touched everyone who knew her, and I will always treasure the special bond we shared. Life will never be the same without you, and there will always be a space in my heart that belongs to you.

“Though you’re no longer here, your love and the memories we created together will stay with me forever.”

Essex Police confirmed investigations into the tragedy continue, with an 18-year-old man from Westcliff and a 17-year-old boy arrested in relation to the incident. Both suspects have been released on bail until September.

In an official statement, the force said: “We know there were a large number of young people in the area at the time, and we believe some may have witnessed what happened. We need anyone who has information and who we’ve not already spoken with to come forward.

“If you have any information, CCTV, dash cam or other footage in relation to this incident, then please get in contact with us. Please quote incident 39 of 13 June.

“You can let us know by submitting a report on our website or by using our online Live Chat service which is available 24 hours-a-day, seven days-a-week. Visit www.essex.police.uk/digital101 to find out more about our online reporting services.

“If you would like to make an anonymous report you can contact independent charity Crimestoppers, by visiting their website or by calling 0800 555 111.”

Ensure our latest stories always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.

In The Mixer’s World Cup special

Everything you need to know about the World Cup – England updates, the games to watch and stories you missed – in five minutes, at 1pm, every day.

A property developer snapping up part of the Berlin Wall has triggered a new Cold War after a neighbour’s complaint – this time not in Germany’s but in England’s capital.

Steve Thorpe, 65, bought a piece of the historic structure and brought it more than 650 miles back to his home in Dulwich, south-east London.

He installed the 3.1m slab at the back of his garden but a neighbour has since complained to Southwark Council about the piece of concrete that used to separate East and West Germany – saying it lacks planning permission.

And the local authority has now launched an investigation into whether the wall, which can be seen from the front door, can stay. 

Mr Thorpe tracked the towering wall chunk down after learning a grain farmer had been using hundreds of sections of it to line his sheds.

Along with a friend, Mr Thorpe flew out to Germany to go Berlin Wall shopping and decided to buy a piece of history.

He said: ‘The original piece I wanted, they wouldn’t sell me as it is going to go to an exhibition at Brandenburg Gate.’

Mr Thorpe instead found another piece of graffiti-daubed wall catching his eye and settled on that.

Mr Thorpe, pictured with his section of the wall, may have to remove it if retrospective planning permission is not granted

He had the segment transported to his home in Dulwich, south-east London

Advertisement

The shopping was the easy task as he then had to transport the heavy wall back to the UK and get it installed in his garden.

He said: ‘It took an awful lot of wrangling to get it here. We had to get export licences and import licences, but we got it.

‘And because it weighs so much, we had to make a dolly to get it down and use lots and lots of machines and winches to get it through the garden.’

After battling the ‘awful’ January weather, the wall was successfully installed at his home.

But for Mr Thorpe it is far more than a garden decoration, it is a ‘really significant part of history’, adding: ‘It’s probably the biggest thing that’s happened in my lifetime.’

Mr Thorpe feels his connections to the wall stretch back to the Cold War when he visited Germany with the club Clifton Rugby and played against the British Army. 

However, the segment has not gone down well with everybody nearby – with one neighbour having formally complained to Southwark Council that Mr Thorpe needed planning permission to install the wall.

Mr Thorpe told the Daily Mail: ‘Just as we finished putting it up, a neighbour asked “what is that?”.

The section is now at the centre of a planning dispute involving Southwark Council

Mr Thorpe said of the structure: ‘Because it weighs so much, we had to make a dolly to get it down and use lots and lots of machines and winches to get it through the garden’

Mr Thorpe feels his connections to the wall stretch back to the Cold War when he visited Germany with the club Clifton Rugby and played against the British Army

The Berlin Wall near the Brandenburg gate which was built in August 1961

Advertisement

‘I explained that it was a piece of the Berlin Wall and he said, “You needed to ask my permission for that”. I didn’t think I needed to.’

He has now applied for retrospective planning permission through Dulwich Estates in the hopes they will allow for the wall to remain and not be torn down for a second time.

He said: ‘They either give me permission or they don’t and I’m not sure what I’ll do if they don’t.’

‘It would be a crime to demolish it. It would cost an awful lot to move it – it cost a fortune to get it in.’

Mr Thorpe says children from the south London neighbourhood come over to view the wall and he has even printed a pamphlet with information on the wall.

Steve said: “Most of my neighbours seem to be very supportive of it. The most historically significant event in my life, in our lives, is the fall of the wall. It’s massive.’

A Southwark Council spokesperson said: ‘We have received a planning complaint about a section of wall installed in Dulwich

‘We will investigate the complaint and take any appropriate action in line with the national planning processes.’

The Berlin Wall – also known as the Iron Curtain – was a 155km (96-mile) barrier built by East Germany in August 1961 to prevent its citizens from fleeing to the West.

It stood until November 1989 when a new travel law was mistakenly announced, which saw crowds rush to the border.

The wall was opened under the onslaught of so many people and ultimately torn down, paving the way for Germany’s reunification the following year.

Mr Thorpe’s neighbour, who is making the complaint, has been approached for comment. 

“The substances burned are harmful to the environment and the cost to remove bonfire debris is an unnecessary expense on an already stretched budget.”

Northern Ireland Water is to take action against the culprits behind a Co Antrim illegal bonfire site amid alleged threats and a failure to reach a resolution.

Village residents and Lisburn and Castlereagh City councillors have previously spoken out against the dumping of material for the Stoneyford bonfire.

Gate pillars at the former Northern Ireland Water reservoir are annually marked in red, white and blue with ‘UVF’ graffiti and a sign directing people to dump material destined for a July bonfire.

READ MORE: Co Down concerns pond pollution linked to bird and wildlife deaths.

READ MORE: Sinn Fein councillor says political ‘silence on sectarian abuse is deafening’.

NI Water statement reads: “NI Water has gathered and documented evidence relating to the activity at the site and continue to do so. This information will be referred to the appropriate authorities.

“NI Water has been robust in engaging with elected representatives, community groups and other statutory agencies in the area.

“Extensive efforts have confirmed that the individuals responsible for this bonfire neither engage with, nor respond to approaches made by intermediaries.

“Unfortunately, given previous experiences on this site neither NI Water nor other agencies were able to secure the services of a contractor to remove materials from the site.”

NIW has previously confirmed in a letter, seen by the Local Democracy Reporting Service, that its staff members have been threatened on site when attempting to negotiate with those responsible for the dump collection and bonfire.

The LDRS in 2025 revealed a £60,000 price tag on bonfire clean-ups at the Stoneyford beauty spot over the last five years, following a decision by the Information Commissioner’s Office to force NIW to release the figures.

The cost included a removal and disposal of tyres by a specialist contractor.

An up to date Freedom of Information request has shown last year’s clean up of bonfire waste on the site cost NIW approximately £2,500.

Video footage seen by the LDRS shows this year’s “1st July Bonfire” being lit with plumes of black smoke coming from the blaze.

NIW added:”Given the absence of any identifiable organisation or recognised point of contact, there is no meaningful route for community engagement or negotiated resolution, and the matter must therefore be addressed through the relevant statutory processes and enforcement mechanisms available.

“NI Water would like to take this opportunity to remind the public that building bonfires on this site is illegal.

“The substances burned are harmful to the environment and the cost to remove bonfire debris is an unnecessary expense on an already stretched budget.”

The LDRS contacted the PSNI. A spokesperson said:”There have been no reports received in relation to threats at the Stoneyford site.

“PSNI continues to engage with all relevant partners in relation to the Stoneyford bonfire site, including the landowner, residents and statutory agencies where appropriate.

“The primary responsibility for decisions relating to structures located on privately owned land rests with the landowner.

“Police engagement has focused on supporting multi-agency discussions, maintaining community safety, assessing any risks associated with the site, and ensuring that any policing response remains proportionate.”

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

New Sentencing Council guidelines for careless driving in England and Wales mean even a momentary lapse in concentration could now result in a driving ban or a fine of up to 250% of your weekly income

Drivers could encounter a driving ban for even minor mistakes behind the wheel – owing to the rigorous new sentencing guidelines for careless driving in England and Wales.

They took effect on July 1, 2025, and mean a brief distraction, such as checking a sat nav, failing to indicate or any momentary lapse, could now trigger significant legal consequences and potentially result in losing your driving entitlement. It’s not solely reckless motorists or those operating vehicles under the influence who need to exercise vigilance; the revised regulations specify that even a temporary error by the most careful of drivers might leave them facing harsh penalties. The overhauled “careless driving” rules – formally termed driving without due care and attention – have been considerably strengthened.

Driving prohibitions lasting up to 56 days are being actively proposed for medium-level offences – incidents that historically would have only incurred penalty points may now mean you forfeit your driving entitlement for nearly two months. Furthermore, substantial fines that can reach 250% of your weekly earnings face those committing even isolated offences, threatening to impact finances severely.

While the possible maximum sentence hasn’t increased, there is a heightened focus on aggravating circumstances associated with the offence, such as consequent harm, indicating the probability of more severe punishments being imposed with increased regularity. Professional motorists face even more rigorous assessments.

Those whose employment relies on driving – whether van operators, HGV drivers, taxi or bus drivers – must remain especially alert. The regulations cite “driving for commercial purposes” or in a goods vehicle as elements that render an offence more grave. Put simply, being on duty at the wheel won’t attract any clemency; in fact, courts may deliver harsher penalties.

Recent revisions to judicial guidance emphasise that intent carries no significance. In essence, if your driving fails to meet the standards of a careful and competent driver – a benchmark readily crossed when distracted – you’re culpable.

Changes implemented by the Sentencing Council aim to address dangerous driving conduct and have reportedly positioned ordinary drivers firmly in the crosshairs, according to a legal specialist.

Speaking when the changes came into effect a year ago, Charlotte Le Maire, a barrister and transport defence authority at CrashLaw24, urged motorists to treat these changes with seriousness.

She said: “This is a real wake-up call for UK motorists. You don’t have to be intentionally dangerous behind the wheel to end up banned. Under these guidelines, just a momentary lapse in concentration can lead to severe consequences – a court summons, a huge fine, even losing your licence.

“Any driver could be one small mistake away from a ban. Drivers absolutely must take these changes seriously and stay alert at all times – because a moment’s distraction can ruin lives.”

The fresh regulations have scarcely come into force, yet Charlotte anticipates a dramatic rise in prosecutions following the 2022 introduction of Causing Serious Injury by Careless Driving. She forecast numerous motorists will be astonished to discover themselves charged with “careless driving” for mistakes they regarded as trivial.

The possible consequences for such offences now encompass brief disqualifications and substantial fines, rendering the cost of a moment’s lapse more expensive than previously, the legal expert warned. Particularly when a collision happens, she underlined that securing prompt legal advice is “crucial”.

Charlotte additionally drew attention to a distinctive element of road traffic law: officers can caution and question you at an incident location without legal representation. The account provided in the chaos after a collision could determine the outcome of a criminal prosecution against you, she underscored.

Each chapter traces a revolutionary idea to a different corner of the globe. In Connecticut and the Caribbean, for instance, she examines how slavery transformed the meaning of liberty, giving rise to new political language and radical demands for freedom. The book is a litany of revolt, a kind of world tour of grievances, from Edinburgh to Guangzhou to Kolkata, and from St Kitts to Sierra Leone.