Are you losing faith? (Sony Interactive Entertainment)
The Wednesday letters page is appalled by Sony’s attempts to justify not owning digital games, as one reader voices doubts about DLSS 5.
Games Inbox is a collection of our readers’ letters, comments, and opinions. To join in with the discussions yourself email gamecentral@metro.co.uk
Ace attorneys I still can’t quite believe what was said by Sony in that story about their legal defence of digital games. I had to read it twice to understand what they were even trying to say and then I realised they were trying to bamboozle the judge with made-up nonsense – the sort of thing you could’ve told your gran 30 years ago, before computers were really a known thing at home.
There’s only one copy so how could any one person own it? Sony, what are you talking about? Rather than mock them though I think it’s depressing just how far they are willing to go, to not do the right thing.
Advertisement
Even though their argument is just a word salad I’m sure they’ll win anyway. I don’t know why we bother having trials. Just see who has the most expensive lawyers and skip to the end where they win.
Anyway, to skip to the end myself I’ll just say this, I’m not buying a PlayStation 6 and I don’t care what it does. Sony is losing the trust and respect of gamers all over the world and I am definitely one of them. I don’t want to buy a gaming PC but that’s what I’m being pushed towards because of their arrogant attitude. Carter
Expert, exclusive gaming analysis
Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning.
Group purchase Hi to all at GC and the readers who make this community fantastic. I am in a pickle of a jam at the moment of only being realistically able to afford one new game in the next few months. Out of the games I would buy – Star Wars Zero Company, Onimusha: Way Of The Sword, and Star Wars: Galactic Racer – I have plumped for Galactic Racer, as it has been on my radar for longer than the others.
Advertisement
As both of these games are semi-niche, I was wondering if someone who is on the fence about getting one, would take a punt on them as they have both reviewed well and I would like to see these sorts of games supported over GTA 6 or EA Sports FC 27 by the masses. I know it’s a long shot but someone taking a chance would be great (physical too).
Many thanks and keep up the good work!! Will
Definitely probably With regards to Rob Lilley’s letter about which format to choose when buying Grand Theft Auto 6. I’ll be genuinely interested to see how the game runs on the Xbox Series S. When it was first announced that the game was coming out for the machine, I seriously thought about buying Microsoft’s cheaper console, because at home I’ve got way too much physical media piled up as it is.
Briefly scanning the internet, I get the impression that Xbox Series S owners are more than happy with their machines. Microsoft had a good idea there, releasing a more affordable console for gamers that weren’t overly bothered about ultra high definition graphics and frame rates.
Advertisement
Looking at the huge liquorice allsort that I have stuck under my telly, I regret not buying a sleek and unobtrusive Xbox Series S instead, when they were attractively priced. But will Microsoft’s budget console run GTA 6? That’s the question.
Beast of a game I am really enjoying my time with Beast Of Reincarnation. Nice vertical and horizontal exploration of sorts, to find hidden items and fun battles to boot.
Advertisement
Thank goodness for those updates along the way. That writing was way too small even on my 65″ TV! Plus, other handy updates. But was it me or didn’t they have the English voice overs when first released? Could swear they didn’t. ShaunOMacY2J (gamertag)
Don’t miss Gaming news! Add us as a Preferred Source
As a loyal GameCentral reader, we want to make sure you never miss our articles when searching for gaming stories. We have all the latest video games news, reviews, previews, and interviews, with a vibrant community of highly engaged readers.
Click the button below and tick Metro.co.uk to ensure you see stories from us first in Google Search.
GameCentral has been delivering unique games news and reviews for over a decade
Unlimited power Love XCOM. I love legacy Star Wars (and Andor), so Zero Company looked brilliant on paper. But in reality, it is even better!
If you are looking for deep strategy, good storytelling, and solid turn-based gameplay I can 200% recommend Zero Company and would highly recommend it to anyone on the fence.
However, my issue is that it’s left me wanting more!
Advertisement
More characters. More missions. More enemies. More gear. More of everything!
I am going to cash in c. 30 years of Metro/ Digi readership points (going all the way back to Digi characters and ‘reveal’ quizzes!) to implore EA to give Bit Reactor the wonga to make more content and greenlight a sequel ASAP!
Would love to know how others have been getting on with this game too. Tom
GC: We would love a DLC pack of aliens, at the very least, but the future of Bit Reactor seems very much up in the air at the moment.
Advertisement
A change is as good as a rest Also loving Star Wars Zero Company – felt I needed to support it but not regretting it at all. I would say that, to me, it does feel like an iteration of XCOM but between the change in theme and the small amendments to the way it plays, it’s just about different enough. That said, it’s not a problem. XCOM is great.
Thinking about it, the theme change may actually be a huge positive for some old school XCOM players (I know at least one). It’s not that its Star Wars, but crucially it’s not XCOM, meaning that hopefully those players aren’t constantly looking at what the game isn’t (the squad sizes are too small, etc.) but can enjoy it on its own terms. Matt (he_who_runs_away – PSN ID)
Pure kino Just caught up on the whole Grand Theft Auto on YouTube and one thing it has reaffirmed to me is that the cinematic verve in a Rockstar production is unmatched in the industry, and that the release of a new GTA is always an event. Something that feels increasingly like a rarity these days.
Other than the frankly unreal graphics (eat your heart out Epic Games), which in my eyes virtually look next gen, I was quite pleased to learn that the game is following in Red Dead Redemption 2’s footsteps with the more rigid adherence to realism and higher stakes in the story.
Advertisement
I’m pretty confident the gunplay, driving, and general controls will feel more fluid and responsive than anything they’ve done to date, and I was amazed by the sheer density of detail and things to see and do in the game’s world – the scuba diving and base jumping activities looked incredible.
But I also hope the game doesn’t take itself too seriously and lose sight of its more gamified, zanier side, like the UFO signs, drug-induced hallucinogenic alien fights, and Ballad Of Gay Tony-like craziness, etc. to counterbalance the magnified mundanities of a life simulator elsewhere.
I also have to once again acknowledge how impeccable Rockstar’s editing and choice of music in their promotional videos and montages are.
I’ve always felt that the GTAs are more than the sum of their parts, and whilst I still have some small reservations about the substance and evolution of the main mission design, how sharp and resonant the satire and writing will be, and the relationship mechanics, I think as a whole the experience is most likely going to be impressive.
Advertisement
Now for an anecdote:
I took my dear grandmother out to brunch the other day, afterwards she wanted to go into a flower shop to purchase some lilies, but I desperately had to use the loo, so momentarily left her side.
When I had returned she was nowhere to be seen, but fortunately I was quickly able to breathe a sigh of relief after I located her in the grocery store next door looking for some borlotti beans.
For a moment there, I thought some nefarious soul had committed gran theft auto. GG
Advertisement
Halloween port Nice to see the well-received The Séance Of Blake Manor has been given a console release date of October 27th for PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X/S, and Nintendo Switch 2.
It’ll be a very reasonable £16.75 on the eShop, the other stores don’t have prices yet. Simundo
GC: It’s a great game; we highly recommend it.
Advertisement
Consistently inconsistent RE: Nick the Greek and when did Sonic games get good again. As a long time Sonic fan I think it’s best to acknowledge that the games have always been a mixed bag. Back when the original trilogy was coming out you had the Game Gear games, which can be considered serviceable at best, but few people are talking about them today.
Then in the late 90s and 2000s, for every Sonic Adventure there’s a Secret Rings. Sonic Unleashed manages to be a great game with Sonic and a poor one with the Werehog, all in one go. Many would say Sonic was consistently good on portables, given the Advance and Rush games, but that ignores the very samey Rivals games on PSP In the 2010s.
We did end up with less games than the 2000s, but sadly that didn’t spark an increase in quality. Games like Lost World and Forces are best described as fine, they function but they’re not going to be all that much fun. Even the racing games embody this mixed bag problem; the Riders series becoming less engaging with each entry and the kart racers being great except for Team Sonic Racing, which had a great idea but poor execution, in my opinion.
And now in the 2020s we’ve got Frontiers and Shadow Generations, which are both fantastic, but then there’s Superstars, which feels like a bad attempt at developing the ideas from Sonic Mania. And of course all of this is ignoring the two underbaked disasters that were 2006 and Boom, which somehow didn’t kill the franchise.
Advertisement
I guess there’s just something about the blue blur that’s allowed him to endure through all the hardship for 35 years, so here’s to 35 more. Sunny
Inbox also-rans Why is it I don’t believe a word Nvidia is saying about DLSS 5? It’s very obvious they only started with NBA 2K27 because it’s got real people in it, that the AI can copy more easily. It’s still going to be a nightmare machine when it tries the same trick with characters there’s less reference for. Focus
I see Double Fine are talking about making a Brütal Legend but, err… aren’t most of the people from the first game dead now? Lemmy, Ozzy Osbourne, Tim Curry… the only one still going, that I can remember, is Rob Halford. And Jack Black, obviously. K
The small print New Inbox updates appear every weekday morning, with special Hot Topic Inboxes at the weekend. Readers’ letters are used on merit and may be edited for length and content.
You can also submit your own 500 to 600-word Reader’s Feature at any time via email or our Submit Stuff page, which if used will be shown in the next available weekend slot.
You can also leave your comments below and don’t forget to follow us on Twitter.
More than 200 Newnham residents have signed a petition calling for a safety review of the Barton Road and Grantchester Street junction
David Prince and Cambridgeshire Live readers
10:19, 01 Sep 2026
Cambridgeshire Live readers are split over a ‘dangerous’ junction, with commenters at odds over who is responsible and what action should be taken.
Cambridge residents have called for a safety review of a ‘dangerous’ junction they claim has been the scene of numerous “near misses”. The junction of Barton Road and Grantchester Street has long been a source of concern for Newnham residents, and despite being redesigned in 2023, many still fear it remains unsafe.
Advertisement
Peter Singleton, chair of the Old Newnham Residents Association, says there are a number of ‘design flaws’ in the current junction that are causing confusion among drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. These include allowing cyclists and pedestrians to cross simultaneously and removing the audible beeping signal indicating it is safe to cross.
The 73-year-old warned that this poses a particular risk to cyclists and pedestrians and has already resulted in accidents and several near misses.
He said: “You’re never going to come up with something that’s going to satisfy everyone, but if we can make it safer, then that’s better. Accidents certainly happen there, and if you like, you could call it a case of more accidents waiting to happen. Particularly in Newnham Croft, there are quite a lot of elderly people who are not so agile.”
He launched a petition at the start of July, which has since gathered more than 200 signatures, sufficient to trigger a debate at Cambridgeshire County Council.
Advertisement
One commenter, Brexit498 quotes: ” ‘Dangerous junction where accidents are waiting to happen’, then they will have to wait a long time because there is no issue here for cyclists, pedestrians or motorists. The road layout is heavily biased towards cyclists and pedestrians (no problem with that), but that group needs to take some responsibility for crossing the road. BTW: how many ‘incidents’ have there been in, say, the last two years?”
Riccy feels: “There is nothing wrong with the junction, it’s the drivers who want to take their tests again and take more care.”
Freddly adds: “Essentially, the problem is one of too many cars and vans, and they are driving too fast for the road conditions. The crossing needs to be on a table which is high and steep enough to damage cars that drive over it at speed. The crossing needs to scrape and damage bunkers if taken at speed, also on SUVs with high clearance.”
Poppythecat says: “The problem is pretty obvious. It’s motorists speeding to beat the lights and, more than likely, going through red lights altogether. If you’re approaching a pedestrian crossing, you should be slowing down, not speeding up to get through before the lights change.”
Advertisement
Throatwobblermangrove writes: “And guess who redesigned this junction in 2023? The GCP, of course. The same issues were predicted back then, but were ignored by the GCP, who imposed the current design, with massive disruption and inconvenience, taking four months just to build the unwanted new crossing and claiming it would ‘improve walking and cycling links and make it safer for people crossing the road’. Yet again, look how wrong they were.”
Over on our Facebook page, Thalia M comments: “It would help if drivers did not ignore the no right turn to the river, and as always, cyclists ignore everything, lights, crossing points, cycle paths. Please don’t rip it up and spend any more time or money on this.”
Gabriel Bienzobas M believes: “A poorly designed junction which during the redesign had the opportunity to prioritise pedestrians and cyclists, but instead prioritises motor traffic.”
Rachel J feels: “Someone needs to be responsible for ensuring the safest possible designs for cyclists. What about that abomination of a roundabout on Fendon Road near the hospital?! It might work for the Dutch, but it doesn’t work in the UK. It’s so dangerous.”
Advertisement
Do you believe that this junction is dangerous? Comment below or HERE to have your say.
Nearly two-thirds of young men watch so-called ‘masculinity’ influencers, according to The Children’s Society (Picture: Shutterstock/Body Stock)
The manosphere is driving a surge in misogyny in schools, with teenage boys refusing to acknowledge female teachers or even mix with girls in their class.
Earlier this year, teaching union NASUWT warned that a ‘masculinity crisis is brewing’ after nearly a quarter of female teachers reported being subjected to misogynistic abuse in the classroom.
That figure has continuously risen over the past four years. Some teachers described feeling ‘humiliated’ and ‘demeaned’ after being ignored by male pupils.
It is something charity founders and filmmakers Alex Williams and Dwayne Gumbs have witnessed first-hand alongside their team on visits to schools to try and tackle those harmful ideologies head-on.
Advertisement
Through their charity Diverse Voices, the London-based pair use their skills to find creative ways to encourage young people from vulnerable communities to express themselves on sensitive topics.
Over the past 16 years, their workshops have been delivered to 40,000 pupils at more than 100 schools up and down the country.
Their work has exposed how harmful views capable of leading to violence against women and girls can be formed at an alarmingly young age.
Children’s views are increasingly being shaped online and in the playground, where they spend most of their time during the week.
Advertisement
Alex tells Metro: ‘We have seen as social media and the online world has developed, that young people have more access to information.
‘The scary part is, who is providing that information? What attitudes are being adopted from the influencers that they are engaging with online?’
Charity founders and filmmakers Alex Williams (left) and Dwayne Gumbs (right) (Picture: Diverse Voices)
This Is Not Right
On November 25, 2024 Metro launched This Is Not Right, a campaign to address the relentless epidemic of violence against women.
With the help of our partners at Women’s Aid, This Is Not Right aims to shine a light on the sheer scale of this national emergency.
Advertisement
You can find more articles here, and if you want to share your story with us, you can send us an email at vaw@metro.co.uk.
Read more:
Advertisement
Nearly two-thirds of young men watch so-called ‘masculinity’ influencers, according to The Children’s Society.
Manosphere content exposes them to negative attitudes towards women and girls – objectifying them, dehumanising them and portraying them as inferior.
The manosphere is a loose network of digital forums and groups claiming to address men’s struggles.
But it often promotes harmful views of women and girls, while misrepresenting men as the oppressed victims of feminism.
Advertisement
‘A really big change I’ve noticed is the separation between boys and girls,’ Alex says of the workshops.
‘10 years ago, if you said in a classroom, “Guys, let’s get into groups”, there would be mixed groups.
‘Now if you say it, the boys will be on one side, and the girls will be on one side, and when you actually encourage mixing these groups, they are out of their comfort zone.
Over the past 16 years, their workshops have been delivered to 40,000 pupils at more than 100 schools up and down the country (Picture: Diverse Voices)
‘But we see that as an important thing to do because it’s not about singling out any gender around this education – it is about shared attitudes, boys who can become potential perpetrators but also girls knowing what shouldn’t be normalised as attitudes and actually being able to have that conversation in mixed groups.
‘But I think that just seeing that separation is something which, especially over the last three years, is something which has really changed.
Advertisement
‘It’s the culture that they’re exposed to online, the fact that boys are consuming a certain type of media and listening to a certain type of influencer and I guess not being exposed to the views of girls and women.
‘Taking that a step further, we’ve had male students who refuse to take instruction from female members of staff. Like, literally stonewall, “I’m not listening, I can’t hear you, I can’t see you”.
‘And yet, a male voice would say something a minute later, and they would react.
‘So, that takes that kind of classroom separation to the next level, where it actually impacts their behaviour and how they engage with teaching staff.’
Advertisement
Dwayne adds: ‘If they’re grouping together in these mini ecosystems around people they feel comfortable having these conversations with, then that just fuels the transfer of misinformation and ignorant views.
‘An important part of what we are really trying to do is to open the conversation up and create an environment where the majority of the learning comes from peer-to-peer conversations, as opposed to us lecturing them about what’s right and what’s wrong.’
To do that, Alex and Dwayne have created short films that feature within a learning portal tailored for both primary and secondary school audiences.
After an initial icebreaker task to encourage everyone to feel comfortable sharing their views, the groups are shown a short film tailored to their ages.
Advertisement
‘Manosphere’ content exposes boys to negative attitudes towards women – objectifying, dehumanising and portraying them as inferior (Picture: Shutterstock/New Africa)
It is accompanied by a discussion on the issues it depicts, including relationships and pressure to have sex, consent, intimate image abuse, self-image and controlling and coercive behaviour.
The young people are asked whether the behaviour shown is ‘acceptable’, ‘unacceptable’ or ‘questionable’.
‘Seeing that through the lens of the film, you really see a lot of bright eyes kind of going, “Ah”, whereas they wouldn’t feel comfortable talking about these things if we were questioning them on what they are doing themselves,’ Alex says.
‘But actually having these characters as a focal point gives them the freedom to say their opinions.’
The conversation is then opened up to feedback on what was discussed in the groups to the whole class, before staff explain healthy approaches and laws surrounding the topic.
Advertisement
‘We’re really empowering them to kind of take ownership of having these discussions, empowering them to feel that their voice is valid and heard,’ Dwayne says.
‘Really, it’s just about facilitating the conversation in a way where a light could be shone on healthy views and opinions that are aired by the students, and really be used to kind of make the point, as opposed to it come directly from the adult in the room.’
The charity also enables schools to continue lessons using resources it has created.
Dwayne says: ‘It’s not an expectation that one conversation is going to change people’s opinions. But it’s continuing that conversation over a period of time and also opening the doors for young people to feel that they can have these conversations with their teachers, with the adults around them, regardless of whether it’s within a program of learning or not.’
Advertisement
Alex says: ‘By the end of that program, they haven’t just been spoken to by a classroom teacher or by us – they’ve actually engaged, interacted, and are now in control of changing the outcomes, which then empowers them to do the same thing in their own lives.
‘We have great results and we have evidence that changes happen. Beyond just those lessons, we have teachers reporting that they overhear the conversations even continuing in the playground.’
The pair emphasise the important role men can play in tackling violence against women and girls.
‘A lot of what we’re actually asking boys to unlearn, they are learning from men,’ Alex says.
Advertisement
‘So, that just puts the responsibility on us as men to actually be positive role models and to affect change.’
For more information on the charity Diverse Voices’ and their resources you can visit https://www.diversevoices.co.uk/or email info@diversevoices.co.uk
However, there could be a straightforward method to discourage them from lingering. According to experts at Pest Defence, the answer might be found in your kitchen cupboard.
One common household item can be sprayed across the grass to make your garden less inviting to these unwelcome guests.
The experts explained: “If you’ve ever watched squirrels closely, you’ll notice their little noses twitching. That’s because they have a keen sense of smell, something that is crucial for them in finding food and avoiding potential dangers.
“Any strong, unfamiliar or even irritating odour will disrupt their behaviour, sometimes even driving them away. That’s why natural repellents are a smart move as your first step in preventing an infestation.”
Advertisement
The same principle works for mice. These creatures also possess a highly developed sense of smell, which they rely on to locate food and navigate. Yet this can equally be exploited to repel them.
What to use to deter squirrels and mice?
Pest Defence recommends using peppermint oil, as the minty aroma is exceptionally powerful to squirrels and can irritate their noses. Unlike vinegar, which can be unpleasant to humans and damage your lawns and plants, peppermint has a bearable scent yet proves effective when applied properly.
Rather than buying a peppermint deterrent online, you can create your own mixture by diluting pure peppermint essential oil with water in a spray bottle. To apply the spray properly, “coat the perimeters of raised beds, the rims of containers, and the poles or bases of bird feeders”.
Advertisement
However, gardeners should avoid spraying bird food or feeding ports directly, as strong essential oils can irritate the birds they welcome.
To stop squirrels from becoming accustomed to the mint, apply the spray at least two to three times weekly. It is also recommended to alternate with cayenne pepper for a week before switching back to peppermint.
A writer at Homes and Garden also suggested: “Soak cotton balls in pure peppermint essential oil and tuck them directly into the soil of vulnerable containers, raised beds, or near the base of prized plants.
Advertisement
“Because the oil is shielded slightly by the cotton, it holds its scent longer outdoors than a topical spray.”
Does it actually work?
Peppermint oil has limitations. It may deter squirrels, but it does not form a complete barrier.
Hungry or territorial squirrels may disregard the scent if they have a compelling reason to remain, reported the West Side Journal. Properties with settled squirrel populations are more difficult to safeguard than those with only sporadic visits.
Squirrels may continue returning to dependable food sources, nesting spots, or well-known pathways despite the scent.
Advertisement
Ultimately, peppermint oil creates discomfort rather than rendering an area completely inaccessible, particularly when food is scarce.
Madonna could scarcely be recognized in the latest jaw-dropping suite of age-defying photos she posted to her Instagram page.
The 68-year-old’s makeup and voluminous blonde hairdo had an air of Pamela Anderson, 59, about them as she posed for the new images.
One snapshot allowed her to showcase her enviably toned physique to full advantage in a clinging scarlet jumpsuit as she strolled down a hallway.
In a behind-the-scenes glimpse from a recent photoshoot, the Queen of Pop slid her statuesque frame into a nude bodysuit and black lace corset.
Advertisement
‘Paint me with your memory, and not with your eyes…….,’ she wrote alongside her new album, which also featured close-ups of her astonishingly smooth complexion.
Admirers flooded into the comments bubbling with praise for the pictures, including her fellow popstar Ricky Martin, who gushed: ‘Yessss.’
Madonna could scarcely be recognized in the latest jaw-dropping suite of age-defying photos she posted to her Instagram page
Advertisement
The 68-year-old’s makeup and voluminous blonde hairdo had an air of Pamela Anderson, 59, about them as she posed for the new images
The Material Girl is in competition for a staggering 11 prizes, narrowly beating out Taylor Swift, who has nods in nine categories.
Advertisement
Swift, 36, and Beyonce, 44, are currently tied as the most decorated artists in the history of the VMAs, each with 30 gongs to their name.
Inasmuch as Beyonce has no nominations this year, all Swift has to do is win a single prize in order to become the reigning record-holder, via the Associated Press.
Madonna famously performed at the first-ever VMAs in 1984, bursting from a gigantic wedding cake while dressed in a bridal gown for a rendition of Like A Virgin.
She has emerged as a reliable engine of memorable moments at the extravaganza, where she ignited a fan frenzy in 2003 by kissing Britney Spears on the lips.
Madonna paid her compliments to JFK Jr’s bedroom skills while appearing in a video for the gay hookup app Grindr, with which she had launched a Pride month partnership as an advertisement for Confessions II.
Share or comment on this article:
Madonna, 68, is unrecognizable as she channels Pamela Anderson and shows off VERY smooth complexion
On the increase of the core funding, Mr Tomlinson added: “That reflects this bottom-up assessment that has taken place, looking across the needs of the Royal Household and making sure that it is being funded adequately for the work, for the public duties that His Royal Highness the King and the royal family carry out.
We told how a “disgusted” legal insider had called for an urgent probe after Alan Eccles, from Giffnock, near Glasgow, had his practising certificate renewed last year after being spared jail for “despicable” offences.
Eccles, a former lawyer for the Scottish Youth Parliament, was sentenced to 300 hours of community service after admitting to engaging in online conversations about the sexual abuse of children as well as sharing indecent photos of kids and an intimate picture of a woman in 2023.
But Law Society of Scotland procedures means a sentence of less than a year in prison does not trigger a suspension and Eccles’ licence to operate was renewed in November, sparking outrage.
Now the Scottish Solicitors’ Discipline Tribunal (SSDT), which has the power to barr a lawyer from practising, has brought misconduct proceedings against Eccles, with a hearing scheduled for later this month.
But it’s understood Eccles will continue to be allowed to work until the process is complete – which could take several more months.
A Law Society of Scotland spokesman said: “Where we have reason to believe that one of our members has not met the high professional standards expected of them we will take action.
“By law, we have powers to suspend a solicitor from practice in limited circumstances, which include where a solicitor has been convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 12 months or more. Other disciplinary measures are available where that threshold is not met but a solicitor is still able to practice pending the conclusion and outcome of the disciplinary process.
Advertisement
“Due to our successful lobbying… we will have enhanced powers to suspend solicitors in the future.”
In June last year, Eccles was tagged for eight months as he was handed his community-based sentence at Paisley Sheriff Court, which included a three-year supervision order. He was also added to the sex offenders register for three years.
His lawyer John Scullion KC told the court the offences took place when his mental health was poor, saying: “He accepts full responsibility.”
Advertisement
Sheriff Bruce Erroch told first offender Eccles his behaviour was “despicable”.
Eccles’s profile was removed from the Law Society’s pages following his conviction but later reinstated.
The society’s new practice year began in November, with details of Eccles’s Hillington-based business remaining on the register after his certificate was renewed.
His webpage still features references from legal professionals, describing him as a “consummate professional” as well as “caring” and “empathetic”.
Advertisement
The decision to allow Eccles, 45, to work again was branded “shameful” at the time but Eccles told the Record there was “nothing unusual” that he still had a practising certificate.
Scottish Conservative spokeswoman for victims and community safety Sharon Dowey said the public would be “appalled” to learn that the “predatory offender” had not only escaped jail but, “as a result of his lenient sentence, is able to continue practising law”.
Scottish Labour justice spokeswoman Pauline McNeill said it was “worrying” that Alan Eccles was still freely practising, saying it was vital appropriate safeguards are in place.
The SSDT decides whether a solicitor is guilty of professional misconduct and on any sanction. It can censure, fine or restrict solicitors’ practice and, in the serious cases, trike a solicitor off the roll.
Advertisement
The procedural hearing of Eccles’ case will be heard privately later this month.
The SSDT said a hearing had been set to hear legal submissions on the case, which require to be heard in private “in the interests of justice”.
It said depending on what the tribunal decides, future hearings of this case may be made public.
Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE.
It wasn’t the usual blood and thunder Belfast derby because the Blues boss made 10 changes to the team that defeated Limavady United at the weekend
Declan Devine’s Glentoran booked their place in round two of the ToalsBet Senior Shield following a 3-1 victory over a youthful Linfield side at the BetMcLean Oval.
It was striker Jordan Jenkins, who was the tormentor in chief, bagging a delicious double within the first six minutes! Substitute Carl Weatherup put the icing on the cake late on with a third.
Advertisement
But it wasn’t the usual blood and thunder Belfast derby because Blues boss David Healy made 10 changes to the team that defeated Limavady United at the weekend, using mostly Under-20 personnel.
They did, however, produce a gutsy showing that heralded a fine strike by Charlie Chapman in the second half.
“We selected a team based on trusting what we have in and around the U20s and in and around the squad. Part of their learning and part of their journey is to come to places like this when you are up against it,” said Healy.
“Glentoran picked a pretty strong team. We got off to the worst start but credit to the players, after 10 or 15 minutes we realised we could cope, we could play.
Advertisement
“We got ourselves back into the game. More positives than negatives. Our most important game is going to be Saturday (Carrick Rangers).”
Most of the talk around the old stadium centred on Glentoran’s new signing Conor McMenamin, who was yesterday snapped up from Coleraine, with Joe Thomson going in the opposite direction.
The former St Mirren man, however, wasn’t involved. No doubt, there are good days up ahead to come form the Northern Ireland international.
Instead, it was Jenkins who had the home fans eating out of his hand.
Advertisement
He required only two minutes to open his goal account for the season.
James Douglas was given time and space on the edge of the box to lay the ball off the the striker and his vicious low drive arrowed into the bottom corner, giving goalkeeper Aidan Glavin no chance.
The home fans were on their feet again four minutes later.
This time, Ryan Cooney drilled in a trademark free kick from the right that was cleverly headed back into the box by Daniel Larmour and Jenkins scored with the flick of his head.
Advertisement
The youthful Linfield side were caught cold.
In fact, the could have been three goals down after only nine minutes only for a miraculous double save from Glavin.
First, he kept out a Jenkins header and when the ball broke to John Daniels, his header was also kept out.
Linfield showed little up front in terms of attacking possibilities. Their only foray forward came on 20 minutes when Dylan Wells showed great feet on the left before looping over a cross that ended in the roof of the netting.
Advertisement
But it was the Glens who almost extended their advantage just after the half-hour. Cooney was again the provider only for Josh Kelly’s wicked low drive to force Glavin into a fantastic low save.
The Blues were almost back in it four three minutes after the interval.
Wells was right out of luck with a 25-yard free kick that had goalkeeper Billy Crellin beaten all ends up only for the ball to strike the outside of the post.
But the visitors were back in it on 56 minutes.
Advertisement
Chapman showed strength and hunger in the box and, when he tried his luck with a low drive, it deflected off the boot of Ethan Brown before nestling in the bottom corner.
Sean Brown then tried his luck with an audacious 30-yard effort, that flashed over.
But it was the Glens who almost increased their lead on 63 minutes. Daniel found Cooney, whose curling effort had Glavin at full stretch, the big shot stopper managing to flick over the top.
They did get a third 14 minutes from time. Cooney’s long throw fell to Weatherup and he cleverly flicked the ball past Glavin.
Prominent Hong Kong pro-democracy campaigner Joshua Wong has pleaded guilty to collusion with foreign entities, a charge that carries a maximum sentence of life in prison under Beijing’s sweeping National Security Law (NSL).
The 29-year-old, who has become the poster child for political activism in Hong Kong, is already serving a sentence of four years and eight months after being convicted of subversion – another NSL violation – in late 2024.
The court said Wong would be sentenced at a later date. His earlier jail term is due to end early next year.
Wong was at the forefront of the Umbrella Movement in 2014 and massive pro-democracy protests in 2019.
Advertisement
The latest charge accuses Wong of conspiring with other campaigners, including exiled activist Nathan Law, to ask foreign countries and entities outside China to impose sanctions or blockades against Beijing.
These include activities that took place between July and late November 2020, the court heard. That was the year China introduced the controversial NSL, which critics say has created a climate of fear and quashed dissent in Hong Kong.
Beijing and Hong Kong authorities argue the law is necessary to maintain stability and deny it has weakened autonomy.
On Tuesday, the court heard that Wong and Law had participated in “international lobbying on numerous occasions”, including via visits to the US, Germany and Italy.
Advertisement
The duo are among several leaders who founded the pro-democracy party Demosistō in April 2016, and ran for the Hong Kong Legislative Council elections that year.
Among other things, prosecutors on Tuesday also accused Wong, along with Law, of promoting the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act: a US federal law that came into force in November 2019, during Donald Trump’s first administration. The Act compels the US government to impose sanctions against mainland China and Hong Kong officials if they are deemed responsible for human rights abuses in Hong Kong.
Even after Demosistō disbanded, Wong had maintained that he would not abandon his political stance and would continue to seek support from the international community, the prosecutors said.
Wong, dressed in a dark blue shirt and dark-rimmed glasses, did not dispute these allegations.
Advertisement
About 40 of Wong’s supporters, including fellow activists and some of his close friends, gathered in court on Tuesday. Some shouted: “Hang in there, Joshua!”
Wong was seen smiling and nodding in response from the dock.
Tsang Kin-shing, a former member of the now-dissolved League of Social Democrats, said he hopes the court will impose a lenient sentence, noting that Wong has by now spent more than 2,000 days in prison.
Fellow activist Louis Lee said Wong and his supporters were disheartened that he was handed another NSL charge while already serving time in prison.
Advertisement
Wong has continued seeking out new interests while in prison, including learning how to play the guitar and working out.
For most of last season, Manchester United were basking in the glow of a successful 2025 summer transfer window. In fact, last year’s recruitment was so good that club bosses decided to stick to the template.
Three forwards and a goalkeeper in 2025 became three midfielders and a goalkeeper in 2026. It doesn’t take a data boffin with an Oxbridge degree to establish that 2027 will be the year the defence gets revamped at Old Trafford.
The question this summer is whether they have done enough. Last year, they had finished 15th in the Premier League and needed to stabilise. In the end, last season went beyond expectations.
Now, they are off the back of a third-place finish in the Premier League and club bosses are talking fancifully of a tilt at the Premier League and Champions League. But have they given Michael Carrick the tools to achieve those ambitions?
Last season ended with chief executive Omar Berrada stressing the need to be “really disciplined” in the transfer market. In fact, he predicted what was coming over the following few months.
“I think the template for what we did last summer will be replicated in many ways,” Berrada said in an in-house interview. He probably didn’t mean it quite so literally, but that is how this summer has panned out.
After Casemiro’s departure, it was always the plan to revamp the midfield this summer, and it was always likely that three new faces would arrive. Part of that was contingent on Manuel Ugarte leaving, but his World Cup injury, which will rule him out for the majority of the season, saw his wages covered by FIFA, allowing United to press on with their midfield search.
Advertisement
The surprise is that more hasn’t been done. United intended to strengthen their left-hand side, and this has happened with the return of Marcus Rashford, but the failure to sign a left-back could yet prove costly.
Rashford dominated the early part of the summer. Barcelona’s decision to spend £69million on Anthony Gordon blindsided the 28-year-old and his camp. The Catalan club considered another loan move and even weighed up lowballing United with an offer half the size of the £26million option.
By June, United had become exasperated with Barcelona’s approach and resolved not to sanction another loan and not to consider an offer of less than £26million. Fairly swiftly, options for Rashford withered, and both parties became open to reintegration.
There was a meeting between United officials and Rashford’s camp during the World Cup and Michael Carrick made contact with his former teammate and someone who he had coached while on Ole Gunnar Solskjaer’s backroom staff. Even before he returned to pre-season training, sources close to the discussions this summer felt United had decided that keeping Rashford was now their best course of action.
Advertisement
Rashford’s return means Patrick Dorgu could be freed up to play at left-back, although internally he is viewed as a winger, and people close to Dorgu believe he will eventually end up as a right-winger rather than a left-back. That leaves right-backs Diogo Dalot and Noussair Mazraoui as the only senior cover for Luke Shaw, as well as 19-year-old Harry Amass, who hasn’t made a matchday squad this season.
United had their eyes on a succession plan for left-back this summer. Shaw has a year to run on his contract and the hope was to sign a young player such as Lewis Hall or Myles Lewis-Skelly to come in and eventually assume that first-team position this summer.
But United’s methodical and diligent approach to spending meant they focused on the midfield first, and when attention turned to Hall, it was clear Newcastle wouldn’t sell. They had been stung by an exodus of big-name players and had to prove a point over Hall, even if the 21-year-old wanted the move to Old Trafford. United’s failure to get players out also meant their budget was smaller than had been expected.
There was brief hope Arsenal could consider selling Lewis-Skelly after they wrapped up a deal for Bruno Guimaraes, but the youngster wanted to stay at his boyhood club and has been integral again in the early weeks of the season.
Advertisement
That left United looking at short-term options, but they were determined that any player they brought in would add to the squad. Ineos were keen to end the era of loan signings such as Odion Ighalo, Wout Weghorst and Sergio Reguilon, who came in as last-ditch measures and offered little.
There was an enquiry for Alejandro Balde at Barcelona, but the Catalan club wanted to sell, perhaps aware that the tables had turned since their own attempts to play tough over Rashford. There was even a call to Manchester City on Tuesday to check on the availability of Rayan Ait-Nouri, who has been an unused substitute in all three of the Blues’ games so far this season.
United had been offered Ait-Nouri by his agent a couple of days ago and with left-back options thin on the ground, they placed a call to the Etihad on Tuesday afternoon, only for City to say they wanted a loan with an obligation to buy. United had no interest in a permanent move for the 25-year-old.
Left-back will be revisited, along with centre-back, next summer, but this window was all about the midfield. The first deal United agreed was a £38.3million package with Atalanta for Ederson, only for that transfer to collapse.
Advertisement
Initial medical tests during the World Cup raised some concern over a knee injury and after further examinations following Brazil’s exit from that tournament, they decided to pull the plug, after first considering whether to try and renegotiate the terms of the deal with Atalanta, something the Serie A side resisted.
That sent United back to the drawing board, but they were happy to work in the shadows. Their ‘pursuit’ of Elliot Anderson continued into June, but it was clear well before then that the England international would cost more than £100million, and United were never going to seriously rival Manchester City at that price.
While rivals have become happy to throw the cash around, United have gone in a different direction, so when Tottenham agreed to pay West Ham’s £85million asking price for Mateus Fernandes, they again baulked at the deal, feeling it didn’t offer value for a player twice relegated from the Premier League already.
United have pursued a data-led process to recruitment over the last couple of years, and two of their three midfield signings scored highly. The first was Andrey Santos, with the move developing quickly. United’s offer of £48million plus £2million in add-ons met Chelsea’s demands, with some sources suggesting the Stamford Bridge club were surprised to conclude a deal so swiftly for someone who couldn’t crack their first-team.
Advertisement
United were pleased with the deal, however, and Santos impressed in pre-season. At 22, he is seen as having plenty of potential and will get more of a chance to show it in Manchester than he did in West London.
The process of signing Carlos Baleba went on a lot longer, but the 22-year-old had his heart set on a move to Old Trafford last summer and the club’s faith in his ability didn’t waver, despite a difficult season at Brighton last term.
United are sold on what the metrics say about Baleba, to the point that they took the unusual step of reeling off his data during the announcement of his £70million arrival from Brighton. Although that deal took until late August to secure, United always knew the player preferred to move to Old Trafford and when they did make contact with the Seagulls, negotiations ran much more smoothly than a year ago, when Brighton demanded £100million and refused to budge.
Content cannot be displayed without consent
A burning desire to play for United is something they have placed a lot of stock in over the last 18 months, so when Youri Tielemans jumped at the chance to move from Aston Villa after his £35million release clause was activated, it only strengthened the belief in that signing. It was another deal that happened swiftly and came under the radar.
Advertisement
For Matheus Cunha, Bryan Mbeumo and Benjamin Sesko last summer, read Santos, Tielemans and Baleba this summer, but one key problem has been moving players on.
United brought in £38million when Rasmus Hojlund saw his loan to Napoli made permanent, but aside from that they have raised just £10million through the sales of Radek Vitek and Toby Collyer to Championship clubs Middlesbrough and West Brom.
There had been initial expectations that United could raise close to £100million, with Rashford’s potential move to Barcelona, interest in Ugarte, an expected move for Joshua Zirkzee, and Andre Onana also on the market.
Onana returned to Trabzonspor on loan, Ugarte picked up that knee injury, and Zirkzee saw three potential loan moves collapse in the final 48 hours of the window, including a switch to Everton, which United decided not to sanction at around 10pm yesterday.
Advertisement
That failure to raise as much money as expected made life more difficult for United this summer. Time will tell whether they have managed to do enough.
Several areas in the UK will climb to 27C this September as the Met Office delivers a September heatwave verdict following the nation’s hottest summer on record
The UK is set for further scorching temperatures this week following the nation’s hottest summer on record.
The Met Office has said that September may see further “very warm spells”, especially in the south, but these are expected to be short lived.
An official heatwave is declared by the Met Office when temperatures reach the “heatwave threshold” for three consecutive days.
Advertisement
The threshold sits at 28C in the south-east, where conditions tend to be warmer, dropping to 25C the further from the south-east you travel.
Therefore, temperatures tomorrow will climb to near heatwave highs, however they are not expected to last. In London and surrounding areas, the weather maps predict that at 3pm, highs of 27C are on the cards.
As Essex and Kent will sit at 26C and 27C, areas further west in the Midlands will sit at around 25C.
Further north headed towards Yorkshire temperatures in the afternoon are likely to be around 21C, with cooler temperatures forecast in Scotland.
Advertisement
By 6pm, it will feel even hotter as more areas will reach 27C.
The weather maps forecast that Berkshire, London and Essex will be the warmest areas.
Hertfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Suffolk and Norfolk are also predicted to reach 25C.
Advertisement
Along the south coast areas including Bournemouth and Brighton will also climb to 25C. Further north in Greater Manchester, the temperature may only reach 18C.
Therefore, although temperatures may not quite climb to the heatwave threshold as outlined by the Met Office the weather is likely to be warm in most areas.
The Met Office forecast for August 31 to September 9 states: “Likely remaining unsettled with showers or longer spells of rain across all areas at times.
“Rainfall amounts will probably be above average for the time year with the wettest conditions in the northwest.
Advertisement
“Potential for some strong winds at times. Some drier and more settled interludes could develop, perhaps becoming longer in duration across southern areas later in this period.
“Temperatures are likely to be near average, although some short-lived warm or very warm spells are possible, especially in the south.”
You must be logged in to post a comment Login