In 2017, Pierluigi Collina was appointed as Fifa’s new head of referees and it heralded a very different era.

Collina often takes about how decisions should serve as justice – for both teams.

Players should stay on the field unless they have done something which truly deserves a red card.

For instance, under his stewardship the law around denying a goalscoring opportunity (Dogso) when a penalty has been awarded have been hugely relaxed. It is now very difficult to get a red card.

So it should be no surprise that the 2018 and 2022 World Cups saw just the four red cards after he took over.

Refereeing at the start of a tournament often seem to sets the tone. Should we be drawing any conclusions from this match?

In his pre-tournament briefing, the Italian was focused on timewasting and general player behaviour.

There was no talk of a hard stands which should result in a huge spike in red cards.

Sometimes red cards are simply justified. Well, most of them anyway.

Sithole’s dismissal for fouling Brian Gutierrez was a simple decision for referee Wilton Sampaio.

The Mexico attacking midfielder was through on goal. Sithole may not have meant to bring him down, but he did. There was no doubt the South African had denied his opponent a clear goalscoring opportunity.

The second dismissal was much more controversial, given to Zwane on a video assistant referee review for violent conduct.

Zwane tussled with Roberto Alvarado, with the Mexican going to ground holding his head.

It looked like a coming together off the ball, but the referee was sent to the pitchside screen by the video assistant referee (VAR), Colombia’s Nicolas Gallo.

As Sampaio was shown the replays at the monitor it was difficult to make out what had happened.

Was there really a hand to the head? And if so, was it accidental or did he swing the arm?

When assessing violent conduct, the VARs are told to look for a clenched fist as a sign of aggression. This does not have to be present, but it is an indicator.

Zwane appeared to connect with an open hand to the side of Alvarado’s head, not with a closed hand.

It looks exceptionally harsh, and not the kind of clear and obvious decision VAR as introduced for.

Or maybe this is exactly the kind of thing Collina had told his referees and VARs to look out for, falling into the category of poor player behaviour.

Collina has brought in red cards for players who cover their mouths in confrontations, and those who leave the field in protest at a decision. He also wants goals disallowed for blocking on set-pieces.

Perhaps the actions of Zwane fall into this sort of category, a way for Collina to try to reduce the dark arts within the game.

Elon Musk’s rocket company SpaceX will make its debut on Wall Street Friday and both institutional and retail investors are expected to gobble up the 555.6 million shares going up for sale at $135 apiece. Musk, already the world’s richest man, could become its first trillionaire.

SpaceX is likely to become the biggest IPO ever, with proceeds of around $75 billion. SpaceX hopes to become the first company to send people to Mars. In fact, part of Musk’s future compensation depends on SpaceX eventually establishing a colony of at least 1 million people on the red planet.

Why SpaceX is going public now

In a video conference on Musk’s social media platform X, he told JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon that people have suggested for the last 10 years that he take SpaceX public. He’s doing it now because the company plans to put 100,000 next-generation Starlink satellites into orbit. Deploying AI data centers in space is a “massive new growth base and you need capital for that,” he said.

Going public provides access to the capital that SpaceX needs. But it also exposes it to more scrutiny from shareholders and more regulatory oversight. That includes filing quarterly financial reports, which critics say incentivizes short-term thinking over longer-term planning and creates unnecessary costs for a company. Securities regulators are currently soliciting public comment on a proposal to require public companies to file the financial reports only twice every year.

How the IPO impacts the company

Musk will hold the majority of a special class of shares, giving him control over decisions related to company strategy, finances and personnel. On the latter, because of his ownership of most of these Class B shares, the only person who can fire Musk as CEO … is Musk.

The company credits Musk with being the “driving force” behind its growth, innovation and success. But what happens if Musk is no longer in the picture? SpaceX warns that the loss of Musk could disrupt its ability to execute its strategy as well as hurt its “reputation and relationships with customers, partners and other stakeholders.”

The company also warns that finding a replacement with the same skills and experience as Musk would be time-consuming, if not nearly impossible. As Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives wrote Wednesday, “At the end of the day Musk is SpaceX and SpaceX is Musk.”

Some big investors are unhappy. Officials from pension funds for firefighters, teachers and other workers in California and New York sent a letter to SpaceX last month decrying some of the provisions in its IPO, including the “super voting shares,” mandatory arbitration of shareholder claims instead of the possibility of lawsuits and how much power Musk will hold over the company.

They said they could become owners of SpaceX stock because they hold index funds, which automatically buy stocks after they get included in certain indexes.

The prospectus filed last week says SpaceX’s biggest potential market is the sale of business-oriented artificial intelligence products designed to transform how people get work done. It’s an opportunity SpaceX predicts would be worth $22.7 trillion if it could somehow dominate rivals like Anthropic, OpenAI and Microsoft in a highly competitive industry. But the prospectus shows no clear path to profitability for the xAI business, which merged with SpaceX earlier this year.

Why Wall Street is paying attention

If the SpaceX IPO is as successful, the stock could quickly join the Nasdaq 100, a widely followed index that tracks the 100 largest non-financial companies in the composite. That’s important because some popular funds, such as the $460 billion QQQ exchange-traded fund, mimic the index and will automatically buy whatever is listed in the index.

Nasdaq recently changed its rules to allow select companies to enter the Nasdaq 100 after just 15 trading days.

S&P Dow Jones Indices, on the other hand, is sticking to established and more traditional thresholds that will not allow SpaceX or other companies with gargantuan IPOs faster entry into its S&P 500 index. That means even high-profile companies will still need to wait for their stocks to trade a full 12 months before they can enter the index.

Companies want to be in the S&P 500 in particular because it’s arguably the most important index on Wall Street, with trillions of dollars either mimicking it exactly or benchmarked against it. Vanguard’s VOO fund that tracks the S&P 500 has roughly $950 billion invested in it, for example.

That same lesson applies to Bab al-Mandab for, in dangerous times, ships go the long way round the Cape of Good Hope. That adds roughly 10 days to journeys, with extra fuel, insurance and freight costs. Those costs do not remain at sea. They work their way into factories, supermarket shelves, defence logistics and, eventually, household bills.

The warning comes from road safety charity IAM RoadSmart, after its recent survey indicated that 54% of drivers have been diverted onto rural routes because of congestion on motorways, dual carriageways and other major A roads.

Rural roads accounted for 60% of road deaths in Britain in 2024, despite carrying just 45% of all traffic, according to Department for Transport figures.

UK drivers urged to ignore sat nav diversions onto rural roads

Nicholas Lyes, director of policy at IAM RoadSmart, said: “Every year, more people are killed on a rural road than any other road type, yet worryingly we’re seeing a high number of people taking unplanned diversions to use them.

“Congestion is inevitable, but we would encourage people to question if a diversion onto an unclassified or single-track route is worth saving a few minutes, considering the increased hazards they might face.

“Often, other people following sat navs will similarly divert and you end up with traffic volumes that exceed what the road is designed for.”

Mr Lyes also warned that without increasing capacity on the wider strategic network, more drivers could be pushed onto unsuitable routes with “potentially grave consequences.”

All future smart motorway projects were cancelled in April 2023 because of safety concerns.

All lane-running smart motorways were rolled out from 2014, which boosts capacity by converting the hard shoulder into a live lane.

Rural roads often feature hazards such as tractors, narrow lanes and restricted views from roadside foliage.

The survey involved 1,042 UK motorists and 114 IAM RoadSmart motorbike riders, and was carried out in February by research firm Online95.

When is it illegal to use a sat nav when driving?

Similar to a phone, it is illegal to hold a sat nav or any similar device that can send or receive data while driving or riding a motorcycle, the Government website explains.

You can use a device held in your hand if:

• you need to call 999 or 112 in an emergency, and it’s unsafe or impractical to stop
• you’re safely parked
• you’re making a contactless payment in a vehicle that is not moving, for example, at a drive-through restaurant
• you’re using the device to park your vehicle remotely

You can use devices with hands-free access, such as a built-in sat nav, too.

It is important to note that the device must not block your view of the road and traffic ahead.

The website adds: “You must stay in full control of your vehicle at all times.

“The police can stop you if they think you’re not in control because you’re distracted and you can be prosecuted.”

Recommended reading:

You can get six penalty points and a £200 fine if you hold and use a phone, sat nav, tablet, or any device that can send and receive data while driving or riding a motorcycle.

If you have passed your driving test in the last two years, you will also lose your licence.

As well as this, three penalty points can be given if you do not have a full view of the road and traffic ahead or proper control of the vehicle.

You can also be taken to court, where you can be banned from driving or get a maximum fine of £1,000 (£2,500 if you’re driving a lorry or bus).

Do you use a sat nav when driving? Let us know in the comments.

South Africa substitute Themba Zwane was sent off after a VAR review for appearing to strike Alvarado in the face late on as the pair tangled, on a day which firmly belonged to the host nation. Brazilian referee Wilton Sampaio produced one more red, sending off Montes in stoppage time for a challenge on Khuliso Mudau.

The final release in a three-coin series from The Royal Mint celebrates friendship with Winnie-the-Pooh, Eeyore, Piglet, and Tigger.

The coin, developed in collaboration with The Walt Disney Company, completes a collection marking 100 years of Winnie-the-Pooh.

Royal Mint launches brand new Winnie-the-Pooh 50p coin

Lucy Mackenzie, director at The Royal Mint, said: “Winnie-the-Pooh has been part of childhood for a hundred years, bringing comfort, warmth, and simple joy to generations of families across the world.

“From bedtime stories to beloved screen adaptations, these characters have a way of staying with us long after we’ve grown up.

“To mark the final coin in this special three-coin collection with The Walt Disney Company feels incredibly fitting, particularly as we celebrate the enduring theme of friendship at the heart of the stories.”

The earlier coins in the series celebrated kindness and loyalty.

The new edition is available in silver proof colour and brilliant uncirculated colour finishes, with prices starting at £15.

The new 50p celebrates friendship and features iconic characters Winnie-the-Pooh, Eeyore, Piglet and Tigger (Image: The Royal Mint/PA Wire)

Royal Mint releases new 50p commemorating Aardman Animations

It is not the only new commemorative coin released recently by The Royal Mint, following a new 50p coin released marking the 50th anniversary of Aardman Animations.

Aardman is known globally for creating some of the UK’s most recognisable animated characters, including Wallace and Gromit, Morph, Shaun the Sheep, and the villainous Feathers McGraw.

The new coin features these beloved characters on its reverse side and was designed by Aardman.

Its characters have charmed audiences for generations, from Morph’s early days on Take Hart to Wallace and Gromit’s iconic misadventures and Shaun the Sheep’s farmyard antics.

To mark its 50th year, the studio is planning a series of celebrations and will release a new film, Shaun the Sheep: The Beast of Mossy Bottom, in the autumn.

Peter Lord, co-founder of Aardman, recently visited The Royal Mint to strike one of the first coins, marking the studio’s milestone year.

He said: “I’m very proud that the story of Aardman, and the characters we’ve created over the last 50 years, are being celebrated by the work of The Royal Mint.

“It was such a pleasure to visit and see for myself, close up, the amazing care and artistry that goes into making these beautiful coins.

“In fact, the whole place reminded me of the Aardman studio – both are full of super-talented artists and craftspeople creating timeless work.”

Recommended reading:

Royal Mint’s top 10 most valuable 50p coins

Here is a list of the top 10 most valuable coins, when they were made, and how many were minted:

1. Atlantic Salmon (2023), 200,000
2. Kew Gardens (2009), 210,000
3. Olympic Wrestling (2011), 1,129,500
4. Olympic Football (2011), 1,161,500
5. Olympic Judo (2011), 1,161,500
6. Olympic Triathlon (2011), 1,163,500
7. Peter Rabbit (2018), 1,400,000
8. Flopsy Bunny (2018), 1,400,000
9. Olympic Tennis (2011), 1,454,000
10. Olympic Goalball (2011), 1,615,500

Have you ever collected or found a rare coin? Let us know in the comments.

For anyone looking a fun night out this June, Belsonic has 10 big gigs lined up

Belsonic kicks off this week with the return of Farmer’s Bash at the South Belfast festival.

If you are looking to see your favourite artists in Belfast this June, looking for fun summer plans or have some serious ‘fomo’ because your friends have tickets – fear not!

There are a number of Belsonic shows with tickets remaining that you can snap up for a last-minute night out.

Here is the full line-up for Belsonic 2026 and how to get tickets:

Farmer’s Bash

Friday June 12 2026

Get tickets here

Josh Baker

Saturday June 13 2026

Get tickets here

Teletech

Advertisement

Saturday June 20 2026

Get tickets here

Teddy Swims

Monday June 22 2026

Get tickets here

Def Leppard

Friday June 26 2026

Get tickets here

Sonny Fodera

Advertisement

Saturday June 27 2026

Get tickets here

The Cure

Sunday June 28 2026 – SOLD OUT

Try for resale tickets here

Kings of Leon

Monday June 29 2026

Get tickets here

Pitbull

Tuesday June 30 2026 – SOLD OUT

Try for resale tickets here

Michael Bublé

Advertisement

Wednesday July 1 2026

Get tickets here

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our What’s On newsletter here

Police have located the car of a missing man from Cambridgeshire

Police are asking the public for their help in the search for a missing man from Cambridgeshire after his car was found close to an estate in Suffolk. 61-year-old James Webb was reported missing on Tuesday evening (June 9) after he failed to return to his home in Burwell.

Suffolk Police said its initial enquiries traced James’ car to the vicinity of Ickworth House in Horringer, and searches have been taking place in that area since Wednesday morning (June 10).

James is described as white, 6ft 2in tall, of slim build and with dark/greying hair. His disappearance is out of character, and so family members and police are concerned for his welfare.

Anyone who believes they have seen James, or who has any information regarding his whereabouts, is asked to contact the Bury St Edmunds Response Investigation Team, quoting reference: CAD 72 of 10 June.

You can contact Suffolk Police, which is leading the search, via 101 or via their website. You should always call 999 in an emergency.

The Welsh Government says it is ‘acting ‘decisively’ to make sure young people are offered ‘additional protection’

Young people across Wales will be offered the meningococcal B (Men B) vaccine for the first time during autumn 2026 as part of a time-limited programme.

The initiative is being launched as a precautionary step following the unprecedented Men B outbreak that primarily affected University of Kent students in March 2026, along with other recent unseasonal clusters across the UK.

Men B is the most common cause of invasive meningococcal disease in the UK and can result in meningitis and sepsis – both potentially fatal conditions.

Research demonstrates young people are at elevated risk of contracting Men B with particularly heightened dangers in higher education environments due to extensive close social interaction. Read the biggest stories in Wales first by signing up to our daily newsletter.

The vaccination programme will operate from July through December 2026 and will be accessible to all those currently aged 17-18 years (born between September 1, 2007, and August 31, 2008) as well as anyone aged 18-25 who will be starting higher education or residential further education for the first time in autumn 2026 including international students.

The vaccine will be administered in a two-dose schedule. Those aged 17-18 will receive an invitation letter from their health board from July 6 with details on how to obtain their vaccine.

Those aged 18-25 who will be commencing higher education or residential further education for the first time this autumn, including international students, will need to contact their health board after July 20 for further information.

Deputy minister for public and preventative health Nerys Evans said: “Meningococcal B is a rare but extremely serious disease that can progress quickly and devastate young lives.

“Following recent outbreaks across the UK the Welsh Government has acted decisively to ensure that young people in Wales will be offered this additional protection and I urge everyone who is eligible to take up their vaccination offer.”

Wales’ chief medical officer, Professor Isabel Oliver, said: “This is a safe and effective vaccine that will offer important protection to those who receive it.

“With the new academic year approaching it is vital that eligible young people come forward for both doses as soon as the programme opens.

“I encourage all those who qualify to act promptly.”

Dr Christopher Johnson, head of vaccine-preventable disease programme at Public Health Wales, said: “Young people heading to university for the first time are at an elevated risk of meningitis B as they mix with new groups of people while enjoying their new environment.

“Having two doses of this vaccination, ideally before they depart for university, will give them the best protection against this infection, which can cause such serious illness.”

Get daily breaking news updates on your phone by joining our WhatsApp community here. We occasionally treat members to special offers, promotions and ads from us and our partners. See our Privacy Notice.

Numerous residents spoke up at a meeting of Stockton Council’s decision-making planning committee after the plans for Sandy Lane West, Billingham, drew 279 letters of objection and just one in support.

People who had lived in the area for decades raised concerns including “horrific” and “incredible” traffic congestion near three schools, potential “chaos” and strain on overstretched, overwhelmed services.

Sandy Lane West, Billingham. Picture: Google.

Tom Carr, managing director of developer TCC Land, told Wednesday’s meeting he wanted the Middlesbrough-based company to help the region grow.

He said: “I want to be able to walk into my local pub as the man who delivers good stuff for his community.”

He said he had made changes and taken on board suggestions, including traffic calming speed cushions, for the outline plan, adding: “I’ve stood in the middle of a muddy field with my boots on, I’ve stood and listened to feedback from residents.

“I want to be able to drive my family past this development and be proud to tell them we developed it.”

Objector Gemma Laycock countered: “My children are going to have to live in it. And I’ve got serious concerns.”

Samantha McHale said a community petition gathered more than 500 signatures, arguing the plan was not safe, sustainable or beneficial.

She said: “The strength of the feeling of our community is clear, our community is united and we’re saying no.

“It will only deepen existing inequalities. We should be investing in services before adding further pressure, not the other way around.

“We are facing a terrifying reality regarding road safety. This development will introduce hundreds of additional vehicles on to our roads near our schools.

“This is already a dangerous stretch of road with multiple accidents and a fatality in the past couple of years. It’s an accident waiting to happen.”

Christopher Harston said: “We often witness crashes, near misses, speeding, incidents, police pursuits, one of which became a crash right outside my front gate.

“Our beloved dog was killed at a junction. If a substantial increase in traffic is approved on these already inadequate roads, one day it may not be a pet that pays the price.”

Angela Molnar said road accidents had gone unreported, adding: “It’s a lived reality for those who live nearby. I personally witnessed a child being knocked over just outside Northfield School.

“These are the kinds of incidents that never appear in your data but are happening in real life. I was involved in a road traffic collision where my car was written off.

“This is not just about congestion, it’s about preventable harm. The risks are already too high, approving this development would make them worse.”

Inside Stockton Council’s planning committee meeting in the council chamber at Dunedin House, Thornaby on the afternoon of Wednesday, June 10. Picture: LDRS.

Objectors described the plans as “totally unsuitable” for the area, expressing worries about parking, spoiling an “oasis of calm”, the loss of green space, impact on wildlife, light and traffic pollution, crime, anti-social behaviour, HGVs, and noise, dust and disruption affecting residents in construction lasting up to four years.

Ward councillor Marcus Vickers argued the plans violated Stockton’s Local Plan which tried to prevent urban sprawl, saying it would destroy fields and would be “the starting gun for coalescing Wolviston Village to the rest of Billingham”.

Cllr David Reynard said the development could be “life-changing” for residents.

Neil Westwick, senior director of the developer’s agent Lichfields, said their detailed traffic surveys and transport assessment found the longest road delay would be 1.1 seconds.

He said it would be a “logical extension settlement” of much-needed homes, leaving a “clear and meaningful physical gap of approximately 260m” between Billingham and Wolviston.

The council’s planning officers recommended the plan for approval. Planning services manager Simon Grundy said they noted residents’ concerns and the site was outside development limits, but this was not enough to warrant refusal.

He said the council did not have five years’ worth of housing land supply, so the balance swung in favour of developers.

He said there would be enough space to protect Billingham and Wolviston’s distinct identities: “It’s considered to be in a sustainable location with good access to services and facilities.

“Taking all matters into account, the adverse impacts are considered to be limited and do not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the proposal.”

Highways engineer Martin Parker said assessments of four key junctions using industry software came back with no capacity issues, prompting responses of “you’re joking” from members of the public.

He said there would be “negligible delays” and officers could not object to the plan: “The impact’s simply not there.

“Yes there have been a number of accidents in the last 20 years. There have been 10 accidents on Thames Road.”

He said one serious accident involving a child “could have happened anywhere” and six less serious accidents were not in the last five years: “We could not class that road as unsafe. There will be good access for all users.”

Further reports, assessments and potential measures were to come to tackle noise for proposed homes near the A19, and a nearby old landfill last used in the 1980s.

Cllr Lynn Hall said she was not reassured, saying: “Would I like to live on this site adjacent to the A19? No.”

Cllr Barry Woodhouse said he had “grave concerns” over traffic, parking near schools, homes’ affordability, the A19 and noise.

He said: “If you put another 179, possibly 300 cars coming in and out of that estate and all the schools, I think it’s going to be a nightmare. I think it’s just the wrong place to put it.”

Cllrs Stephen Dodds said the plan was “not a natural fit” for the area and there was a “disconnect between modelling and reality, people’s real-life experiences”. Cllr Shakeel Hussain said: “It just doesn’t fit right. It would just ruin the identity of Wolviston.”

Councillors voted 10-2 to reject the plan on the grounds of traffic, A19 noise, loss of agricultural land, development limits, biodiversity and mixing Billingham and Wolviston.