The 18-year-old was fatally stabbed by Vickrum Digwa in Southampton on 3 December last year, with two officers now under investigation by the IOPC
Two Hampshire police officers are facing a gross misconduct investigation following the arrest and handcuffing of Henry Nowak.
The 18 year old had told officers he had been stabbed and was struggling to breathe after the attack in Southampton on 3rd December last year, yet his desperate pleas were dismissed and officers failed to recognise he had suffered life-threatening injuries.
Henry was denied first aid and was instead restrained in handcuffs as he lay dying.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) has now confirmed it is probing the behaviour of the officers and their alleged failure to acknowledge that the student required urgent medical attention following a stabbing by Vickrum Digwa.
Digwa, 23, was last month handed a life sentence for the deadly assault, after which he spun what a court described as a “wicked lie” to police, falsely claiming he had been the victim of a racist attack, reports the Mirror.
According to the IOPC, evidence indicates the two officers may have fallen short of professional conduct standards relating to duties and responsibilities, use of force, and discreditable behaviour.
One officer faces scrutiny over potentially disregarding the teenager’s claim that he had been stabbed. The watchdog is additionally examining whether race or religion influenced the officers’ decision-making.
Henry’s family has been notified of the decision to launch a formal investigation.
IOPC director of engagement Derrick Campbell said: “We continue to extend our deepest sympathies to Henry’s family and friends. “Our investigators met with Henry’s family earlier this month where we were able to discuss our investigation with them in depth, now that criminal proceedings have concluded.
“We are obliged to constantly review the evidence obtained throughout our investigations and assess any indications of potential misconduct for officers involved. As a result, two officers will now face gross misconduct investigations.
“There is clear evidence that public confidence in the force may have been seriously harmed by this incident, and that is a factor we must consider when assessing the evidence.
“The serving of gross misconduct notices does not necessarily mean that disciplinary proceedings will follow. At the end of our investigation, we will decide whether any officers should face disciplinary proceedings.”




You must be logged in to post a comment Login