Emergency services were called to the major road near Osmotherley on Tuesday (February 10) after the lorry set on fire around 3.15pm.

Firefighters used two hose reel jets to douse the flames at the cab, while the trailer of the wagon remained in tact.

Two crews from the North Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service attended alongside North Yorkshire Police and the Yorkshire Ambulance Service.

The road was closed on both sides of the carriageway, sparking severe delays north and south. Traffic was released on both sides just before 5pm.

The Yorkshire Ambulance Service has confirmed it attended but nobody required any medical assistance. 

A spokesperson said: “An ambulance crew came across an incident on the A19 near Osmotherley around 3.25pm on Tuesday afternoon, but no-one required medical assistance.”

The Derbyshire village decided on a voluntary quarantine in 1665 to stop the deadly disease spreading further

Tucked away in the Derbyshire countryside lies a charming village, rich in history and often referred to by visitors as a true “hidden gem”.

But the quaint cottage-filled village of Eyam hides a much darker past. During the horrifyingly dark days of the Great Plague in the 1600s, when the entire country was in chaos, the villagers of Eyam chose to defy convention.

Across Britain, people were abandoning their homes in a desperate bid to flee from infection. However, when the plague reached Eyam in August 1665, the villagers resolved to do the opposite and stay put.

It’s believed the disease was introduced to the village through a parcel of cloths, transported from London to a local tailor. The tailor’s assistant died a few days after airing the damp cloth, and the disease rapidly spread throughout the village.

Best Peak District holiday cottage deals

Advertisement

This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more

From £32 per night

Sykes Cottages

See the deals

Famous for its dramatic landscapes of rolling hills, limestone dales, gritstone edges and picturesque villages, the Peak District is perfect for walking and outdoor adventures. Popular with visitors from all over the world, Sykes Cottages has plenty of places to stay with prices from £32 per night.

In a collective decision, the villagers opted for voluntary quarantine, believing that fleeing would only spread the plague further across the region. The rules were stringent – no one was to leave or enter the village – a policy that persisted for a gruelling 14 months.

Despite these measures, the village suffered a significant loss of life, with an estimated 260 losing their lives to the terrible illness, decimating a substantial portion of its population.

In fact, it’s reported that one villager tragically had to bury six of her children and her husband within a mere eight-day period.

Visitors can now discover the village’s importance during this dark period at Eyam Museum, which serves as an ideal starting point for exploring the area. Numerous sites across the village share poignant stories connected to the plague and its devastating impact.

A recent visitor described the venue as a “hidden gem”. Another wrote on TripAdvisor: “Really enjoyed our visit to the Eyam Museum. Staff were welcoming and friendly.

“Lots to see within the museum despite it being quite small; a good variation of visual displays about the Plague and also the history of the residents of Eyam. We’d certainly recommend a visit.”

Meanwhile, one person shared: “This museum was really interesting- much better than expected from a small museum! The history is fascinating and very well laid out – they manage to bring it to life by the stories of the individuals and families who both survived and died.”

The village is also home to Eyam Hall and Courtyard, a manor house from the 17th century featuring magnificent gardens alongside a venue to shop and dine at Bloom Bar and Grill.

Following a visit, someone said: “A beautiful venue for a wedding! Such a gorgeous, peaceful village with stunning surroundings and grounds. This made for an incredibly memorable evening.”

Where to eat and drink

Following a visit to the cafe on the premises, another individual said: “We dropped into Bloom looking for a light lunch.

“We settled for a coffee and a Margarita pizza, which definitely exceeded expectations – my friend said it was the best pizza she had ever tasted. Service was attentive, and the ambiance was calm and peaceful.”

If you fancy something stronger, The Miner’s Arms in the heart of the village is cosy pub serving lunch Thursday through to Sunday and evening meals Monday to Saturday.

When Iranian and US officials met for talks in the Omani capital of Muscat on February 6, many journalists and analysts were speculating as to whether diplomacy will fail and whether war will inevitably follow. But that framing misses the deeper reality of this moment. The more important question is why both sides have returned to the negotiating table at all, despite years of hostility, sanctions, proxy conflict and open threats.

The anxiety that has surrounded the talks is understandable. Washington warned its citizens to leave Iran hours before the talks took place, fuelling speculation about military strikes. US officials outlined sweeping demands that go far beyond wanting to curb Iran’s ambition to possess nuclear weapons. And recent history offers no shortage of examples where negotiations have collapsed into violence.

But treating the talks as a countdown to conflict misunderstands diplomacy and the balance of power in the Middle East today. Negotiations are not a single test of resolve, nor a one-off gamble on peace. The talks in Oman were not a final reckoning but an opening move. They reflect a shared recognition in Washington and Tehran that 15 years of coercion, pressure and force have failed to produce decisive outcomes, and that escalation now would be vastly more dangerous than before.

As diplomacy scholar Geoffrey Berridge has long argued, the first stage of any serious diplomatic process is the establishment of common ground on key points. Only once this groundwork is laid can substantive negotiations begin. The talks in Oman should thus be understood as an opening phase rather than a decisive round.

The purpose was to clarify positions, communicate red lines and test whether a workable diplomatic pathway exists. Iranian officials described the atmosphere as constructive, noting that the two sides communicated their concerns and views through their host, Oman’s foreign minister Badr Albusaidi. This is precisely how diplomacy begins, not how it ends, and Iranian and US officials have both subsequently called for talks to continue.

For Tehran, engaging a US delegation in talks is significant. Iran has consistently sought recognition as a legitimate regional player rather than a state to be coerced or isolated. The willingness of Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, to attend the talks personally signals how seriously Iran views this moment and how invested it is in a diplomatic outcome that confers mutual respect.

For Washington, the incentives are equally clear. Over the past 15 years, the US has applied nearly every available tool of pressure against Iran. These have included sanctions, cyber operations, targeted strikes, the killing of senior Iranian figures, the degradation of Iran-aligned groups across the region and direct support for Israel during its brief 2025 war with Iran. Yet none of this has delivered regime change, capitulation or lasting regional stability.

Sanctions have devastated the Iranian economy and Tehran’s regional network has been weakened. Hezbollah has faced mounting pressure and economic strain in Lebanon, Hamas has been severely battered in Gaza and Houthi forces in Yemen have been constrained by international military patrols. Even so, Iran’s core political system remains intact.

Domestic unrest has also failed to produce collapse. Recent protests, met with intense and often violent repression, did not topple a regime that has been deliberately built to survive external pressure since 1979. This highlights a central paradox: Iran may be weaker than at any point in recent decades, but it is not as fragile as many external observers assume.

Washington’s negotiating position

Statements from US officials insisting that talks should encompass Iran’s ballistic missile programme, its regional alliances and its domestic governance represent the high end of any negotiating position.

This is not unusual. In diplomacy, opening demands are often maximalist by design. They are intended to create leverage rather than define an achievable endpoint, something the US president, Donald Trump, is known for. The risk lies in treating these demands as simultaneously attainable.

From Tehran’s perspective, these issues are not equivalent. Iran has consistently signalled that nuclear weapons are the only area it is prepared to engage meaningfully over. This is because its nuclear programme has already been internationalised through treaties, inspections and prior agreements.

Iran’s leadership has also repeatedly pointed to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s religious decree declaring the production and use of nuclear weapons forbidden under Islamic law. Western policymakers are sceptical of the decree’s legal enforceability. But it nonetheless provides Tehran with an ideological framework that allows nuclear restraint to be framed domestically as principled rather than imposed from outside.

In contrast, Iran views the existence of its ballistic missile arsenal as non-negotiable. In a region where Iran faces nuclear-armed adversaries and an overwhelming conventional military imbalance, missile capabilities are central to its deterrence strategy. Likewise, Iran’s regional alliances are not simply tools of influence. They are an extension of this defensive posture that has been shaped by decades of war, sanctions and isolation.

Domestic governance is even more sensitive. No Iranian negotiating team could accept external constraints on how the Islamic Republic governs itself without calling into question the legitimacy of the system they represent. Attempts to fuse diplomacy with demands for internal political reform are therefore perceived not as bargaining positions, but as existential threats.

Bundling nuclear limits, regional retrenchment and internal transformation into a single negotiating framework thus risks overreach. Progress is far more likely through sequencing: addressing the nuclear issue first, building confidence through verification and reciprocity, and only then exploring narrower forms of deescalation elsewhere. Understanding this helps explain why talks can proceed despite sharp rhetoric and military signalling.

Mutual risk, mutual opportunity

Araghchi’s description of the talks in Muscat as a “good beginning” where both sides were able to convey their interests and concerns, as well as his subsequent expression of hope for further negotiations, suggests that diplomacy remains preferable for Iran. The same probably applies for the US.

Military intervention has rarely produced stable outcomes in recent Middle Eastern and North African history. The removal of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Muammar Gaddafi in Libya and the collapse of state authority in Syria did not bring immediate peace or genuine democracy. They produced power vacuums, proxy wars, mass displacement and chronic instability.

Iran is larger, more institutionalised and more deeply embedded in regional dynamics than any of those cases. A conflict involving the Islamic Republic would be longer, more destructive and far harder to contain.

The real danger is not that diplomacy between Iran and the US will fail, but that it will be dismissed too quickly. Negotiations are incremental, often frustrating and rarely linear. But in this case, they may reflect the only viable strategy available to both sides.

Iran avoids an unwinnable war. The US avoids another Middle Eastern quagmire. And the region gains a fragile but vital opportunity to move away from permanent crisis. In that sense, the talks themselves may already represent the most meaningful progress possible.

Why so wet?

Around 17 January a blocking area of high pressure developed in Scandinavia and it’s still there to this day.

This has prevented areas of low pressure from moving beyond the UK, so they’ve become slow-moving, bringing very wet weather, with south-west winds to the south of the UK and south-easterly winds to the north of the UK. This wind pattern is responsible for the distribution of rain.

It’s worth pointing out that it hasn’t been wet everywhere.

North-west England and west Scotland had a much drier January than normal, and parts of the Highlands have only recorded 1mm of rain so far this month.

The Scandinavian blocking area of high pressure is finally going to budge this week, allowing our weather to turn colder with some hill snow in the north later this week.

Next week our weather patterns will become more typical for the time of year with the Atlantic jet stream returning to the north-west of Scotland, rather than taking an unusual position near Morocco.

There will still be rain around as we’d expect in winter, but some of the wettest weather will return to west Scotland. The rain won’t be as extreme in east Scotland. In the southwest of England, it won’t rain every single day, there will be drier and sunnier days between our weather systems.

Heading towards the end of February, there are hints that an area of high pressure may visit our shores, bringing some more settled weather conditions. It’s a long way off, but it’s the least we deserve given just how wet and dull it’s been over recent weeks.

PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — Republican Sen. Susan Collins announced her reelection bid Tuesday, betting that she can hold onto her coveted Maine seat despite a renewed Democratic effort to oust her in a race that could determine control of the U.S. Senate.

The campaign will test Collins’ political survival skills. The 73-year-old has won five terms by casting herself as a reflection of Maine’s independent spirit, occasionally clashing with President Donald Trump while also largely supporting his agenda.

“I have always worked across the aisle to solve problems. Maine needs experienced, steady leadership that focuses on getting things done,” Collins said in a Tuesday statement.

As she seeks a sixth term, Collins faces outrage over immigration enforcement tactics that could become a political liability for Republican candidates across the country. A recent operation in Maine led to hundreds of arrests but also criticism that people were being rounded up even if they didn’t have criminal records.

Collins has taken credit for stopping the surge of federal agents in Maine after she spoke directly with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

However, Democrats accused Collins of not going far enough, pointing to her refusal to call for Noem’s ouster and her vote in favor of a bipartisan Homeland Security funding bill. The party needs to net four seats to retake the Senate majority, and they are aiming to do that in Maine, North Carolina, Alaska and Ohio.

Gov. Janet Mills and oyster farmer Graham Platner are among Collins’ top Democratic challengers. While many establishment Democrats and influential left-leaning groups have backed Mills, Platner has gained traction with his anti-establishment image and economic equality message. He’s campaigned aggressively while facing revelations of problematic social media posts and having to cover up a tattoo resembling a Nazi symbol.

Mills has accused Collins of governing “without any courage” shortly after the Republican voted in favor of funding the DHS and several other agencies in January. She repeated that charge Tuesday.

“Seniority without a backbone is just tenure, and after decades in Washington, Senator Collins has failed to demonstrate the leadership required in this dangerous moment in history,” she said in a statement.

Platner has demanded that Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which is part of DHS, be dismantled and said he did not believe Collins or the Trump administration’s promise to leave Maine. He said Tuesday in a post on the social platform X that Collins should have kept her promise to serve just two Senate terms.

“That’s just one of a hundred reasons she doesn’t deserve a sixth term,” he wrote.

Platner recently outraised both Mills and Collins, according to the latest federal filings. The first-time candidate collected nearly $4.6 million, while Mills raised $2.7 million. Collins, who had not yet officially launched her campaign during the filing period, had more than $8 million in cash on hand at the end of 2025.

Collins, who has said she didn’t vote for Trump in 2016, voted to convict the president after his 2021 impeachment over his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. After Collins joined a handful of Republican colleagues in backing a failed effort to limit the president’s ability to unilaterally use force in Venezuela, Trump said on social media that they “should never be elected to office again.”

But Collins has also broadly backed Trump’s agenda, including his tax and spending bill, and his nominees.

Notably, Collins voted to confirm Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Trump’s choice to be secretary of Health and Human Services. Kennedy has since espoused anti-vaccine policy and ousted public health officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

She has faced down tough challenges before. Democrat Sara Gideon raised $69 million in 2020, outspending Collins in a bid to help take back the Senate during a presidential election year when the Democrats won the top of the ticket. Collins defeated Gideon by more than 8 points.

Collins has remained in office despite Maine becoming increasingly blue. The proportion of registered Democrats has increased since her last reelection campaign, when “unenrolled” independent voters outnumbered Democrats in 2019 but now trail them in 2026. Republicans have trailed both groups for years.

___

Kruesi reported from Providence, Rhode Island.

Louise Stabler will appear at Durham Crown Court later this month for sentencing after pleading guilty to bringing drugs into a prison, in Barnard Castle.

The serial shoplifter admitting an array of theft offences, most in breach of a criminal behaviour order (CBO) put in place by magistrates last May. The 37-year-old, of Shinwell Crescent in Thornley, admitted 29 thefts and 26 breaches of her CBO.

She will also be sentenced for trying to bring/throw drugs into a prison.

Stabler admitted trying to pass alprazolam tablets over on a visit to HMP Deerbolt, near Barnard Castle, on May 17 last year.

She was seen on CCTV handing over a package, found to contain the Class C drugs, to a prisoner.

Stabler was taken into custody, shown the CCTV and replied no comment in interview.

But having now admitted the offence, she will be sentenced along with all other matters at the crown court, on Thursday February 26.

PC Rob Booth, of Barnard Castle neighbourhood policing team, said: “This is a great result, demonstrating that we will take action and target anyone involved in the supply of drugs in and out of prisons.

“We’re working closely with our prison partners to keep drugs out by dismantling illegal activity and ensure those responsible are held accountable, like Stabler.”

He urged anyone aware of any form of criminal activity, or with concerns, to contact police on 101.

The Press has approached Labour MPs in the region as to whether or not they support the Prime Minister.

In their responses yesterday, neither Luke Charters or Rachael Maskell expressed direct support for Sir Keir with Ms Maskell saying she would wait to hear what the PM would say to Labour MPs that evening.

Earlier that day both Selby MP Keir Mather and Scarborough and Whitby MP Alison Hume said they were backing Sir Keir staying on as PM.

RECOMMENDED READING:

This afternoon, Rachael Maskell told the Press: “I was pleased that the Prime Minister spoke with Members of the Parliamentary Labour Party yesterday, to own the decisions that he took and to show regret of the reprehensible behaviours of Peter Mandelson and the repugnant abuse of the women survivors of Jeffrey Epstein.

“Rightly there was deep scrutiny as the stakes are so high for Labour to get governing right. There was optimism raised over the change that must now happen to prevent further occurrences and to reform the operations of the Labour Party.”

“Luke (Charters) continues to support the Labour Government led by Keir Starmer as Prime Minister.” (Image: Pic supplied)

The statement from Ms Maskell, who represents York Central, continued: “He now has got to propel this confidence across the country.”

 “I will be backing Labour every step of the way to succeed, because if we do not change as a result, we let down the very people we are here to fight for, the survivors of sexual abuse; and those gaslit by powerful men.

“Harriet Harman was right to call this out, as I did last week, and to call for candour. I am glad the Prime Minister heeded that call.

“He now needs to change the culture of the Labour Party so it is open, transparent and inclusive; as accountability prevents such errors reoccurring.”

A spokesperson for York Outer MP Luke Charters told the Press this afternoon: “He would not be giving a daily commentary on leadership matters. Luke continues to support the Labour Government led by Keir Starmer as Prime Minister.”

As previously reported, Mr Starmer told Labour MPs last night: “Every fight I’ve been in, I have won.”

In extracts shared by Downing Street, he also said: ‘I’m not prepared to walk away from my mandate and my responsibility to my country, or to plunge us into chaos, as others have done.”

He added: “I’ll tell you this, as long as I have breath in my body, I’ll be in that fight, on behalf of the country that I love and I believe in, against those that want to tear it up.

“That is my fight, that is all of our fight, and we’re in this together.”

However, Thirsk And Malton Conservative MP Kevin Hollinrake told ITN on Monday that Sir Keir’s position is ‘untenable’ after the PM’s advisor Morgan McSweeney resigned.

Mr Hollinrake, who is Conservative Party Chairman, also told BBC Breakfast Sir Keir is “living on borrowed time” and his “tenure is coming to an end.”

The MP also posted on X an interview with LBC radio where he said: “Politics doesn’t like a weak leader and Starmer is the weakest we’ve seen for a long, long time.”

Senator Mark Kelly has blasted Donald Trump’s “outrageous abuse of power,” after a grand jury in Washington reportedly refused to indict him and other Democratic lawmakers in connection with a video in which they urged U.S. military members to resist “illegal orders.”

“This is an outrageous abuse of power by Donald Trump and his lackies,” Kelly, a former NASA astronaut and U.S. naval officer wrote on X Tuesday night, following reports of the behind-closed-doors hearing.

“It wasn’t enough for Pete Hegseth to censure me and threaten to demote me, now it appears they tried to have me charged with a crime — all because of something I said that they didn’t like. That’s not the way things work in America.”

At the urging of U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, the DOJ had reportedly opened an investigation into the video featuring Kelly, as well as Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin and four other Dems, who urged service members to follow established military protocols and reject orders they believe to be unlawful.

open image in gallery

All the lawmakers previously served in the military or at intelligence agencies, and included Representatives Jason Crow, Maggie Goodlander, Chrissy Houlahan and Chris Deluzio.

“Donald Trump wants every American to be too scared to speak out against him. The most patriotic thing any of us can do is not back down,” Kelly added in his post.

Prosecutors had sought to persuade the civilian members of the grand jury that the lawmakers violated a law that does not allow interfering with “the loyalty, morale or discipline of the U.S. armed forces,” The New York Times reported.

The Independent has reached out to the DOJ and Pirro’s office for comment.

In her own lengthy post, Slotkin wrote: “Today, it was a grand jury of anonymous American citizens who upheld the rule of law and determined this case should not proceed. Hopefully, this ends this politicized investigation for good.

open image in gallery

“But today wasn’t just an embarrassing day for the Administration. It was another sad day for our country.”

She added: “Because whether or not Pirro succeeded is not the point. It’s that President Trump continues to weaponize our justice system against his perceived enemies. It’s the kind of thing you see in a foreign country, not in the United States we know and love.”

Crow, a former Army Ranger wrote, “Donald Trump’s DOJ just tried—and failed—to indict me in front of a grand jury. We will continue to fight back against their rising tyranny. Don’t Give Up the Ship.”

California Senator Adam Schiff, who was not named in the investigation, wrote: “That the DOJ would even contemplate such an action demonstrates what a repressive regime is now running this country.”

Grand jurors in Washington declined to sign off on charges in the latest of a series of rebukes of prosecutors by citizens in the nation’s capital, a source told The Associated Press.

It wasn’t immediately clear whether prosecutors had sought indictments against all six lawmakers or what charge or charges prosecutors attempted to bring.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

A group has come together in an attempt to buy the property, with one member saying that “it feels like now or never”

A campaign group in a Cambridgeshire village hopes to buy a former pub and Indian restaurant. Save The Hoops – a group of residents in Little and Great Eversden – has come together to “protect the future” of The Hoops.

The award-winning restaurant, Cam Spice, formerly known as The Hoops Tandoori, in Great Eversden, closed its doors last year. The property has since been listed on Rightmove for sale as an Asset of Community Value (ACV).

The community has until the middle of April to submit a bid to the owner. An ACV protects local assets from being sold or redeveloped without the community having a chance to bid.

Paul Trivett, a member of Save The Hoops, has lived in Great Eversden for around seven years. He said: “We don’t have a shop, we don’t have a post office, we don’t have anything that’s open on a regular basis.

”So, this seems to be our last opportunity to have such a thing,” he said. “Once lost, a pub is almost irreparable to replace, with a permanent impact on village life.”

Save The Hoops has launched a website asking people to put pledges in for when the community share offer opens. This is to help strengthen their bid and unlock grant funding, as the group aims to raise £700,000. Around 20 people have come together to raise the funds, including marketing professionals, gardeners, builders, surveyors, and roofing contractors.

Abigail Newnham is a parish councillor for Little and Great Eversden, and a member of the Save The Hoops group. She said: “It feels like now or never. So we either sit back as a village and show no interest in this, or we see what is possible.”

She added: “It is about making sure we don’t lose this community asset, however it might operate in the future, whether that is a pub, a restaurant, a café or shop.”

Another member of the group, Alan Woods, has lived in Great Eversden for 45 years. He said that protecting the pub is important to him because it is “the main centre of the village”. He added: “I have lived here 45 years and there’s more things that go on at the pub than anywhere else.”

The group aims for the community to purchase the property and lease it to a hospitality operator. This would keep it as a community asset without expecting the community to work shifts.