Asked why the slogan focuses on the Prime Minister, as opposed to a Reform policy, Mr Farage told reporters the upcoming elections “are in some of Labour’s strongest areas in the country, and the offering that he gave the country back in 2024, frankly, has been ignored completely”.

Stojsavljevic, 17, is the second-lowest ranked player in a Great Britain team missing Emma Raducanu, Sonay Kartal, Katie Boulter, and Fran Jones – all of whom are ranked inside the world’s top 100 for singles.

But the 2024 US Open junior champion, described by Great Britain captain Anne Keothavong as “not your average 17-year-old”, was unfazed by her underdog status and the Australian crowd, holding her nerve to clinch the first set in a tie-break after letting a 3-1 lead slip.

She later saved five break points in the penultimate game of the match before converting her first match point.

“It feels amazing. I can’t believe it. I can’t even remember the last point,” Stojsavljevic said. “I had amazing support from the side and managed to get through.

“Going into it, I knew she’d have the home ground. I’m grateful to the people supporting GB today.

“It was a good match. We have very similar games, both quite aggressive, so I’m happy I got through it.”

Keothavong added: “She’s not your average 17-year-old. For some, it can be overwhelming, but I think for Mika, she’s really taken it into her stride. I also have to credit her team-mates. They’ve shown her the ropes.

“Being able to express whether you feel nerves, that’s OK, because your opponent’s probably going to feel exactly the same, if not more because let’s face it, the pressure was on Talia [Gibson] and any player going on court against her.”

Dart’s meeting with world number 80 Birrell was characterised by service struggles, with no fewer than 16 breaks of serve and 27 break-point opportunities across the match.

After losing the opening set 6-4, the turning point for Dart came in the fifth game of the second when she held to 15 to end a run of four consecutive dropped service games. She then won three of the next five games, including a crucial second hold, to force a deciding set.

At 3-3 in the third, the 29-year-old broke Birrell for the eighth time before winning the next two game to secure the win.

The object was thrown “full force” at the windscreen of a passing car.

A six-year-old child was left “covered” in shattered glass after a “brick” was thrown from a bridge in Glasgow. A motorist was forced to slam on the brakes after the object smashed into their windscreen while travelling along Springburn Road.

Emergency services were called to the scene at around 7.50pm last night after the driver managed to pull over safely. No injuries were reported following the incident but police are now investigating, reports Glasgow Live.

The No1seems2care Facebook page shared images of the “extremely dangerous” incident. In a post, they said: “Imagine driving a car with a 6-year-old child on board and youths throw a brick full force at your windscreen from the bridge at Springburn.

“The child was covered with fragments of glass and absolutely terrified. Not only could this have seriously injured or killed the child, the sudden impact and shock could have caused the driver to lose control and crash the vehicle into other vehicles.

“This was an extremely dangerous thing to do! This isn’t the first time this has happened at the bridge at Springburn and the bridges on the M8 near the Royston area.

“This has to stop before people get seriously injured or killed. This could happen to you or your loved ones. Please talk to your children about this. Thank you.”

A Police Scotland spokesperson confirmed they are investigating the incident.

The spokesperson said: “Around 7.50pm on Thursday, April 9, we received a report of a windscreen being damaged from an item thrown from an overbridge on Springburn Road, Glasgow.

“There were no reported injuries and enquiries are ongoing.”

Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE

Hotel chiefs are blaming a slump in international visitors for World Cup bookings on a ‘Trump slump’ as key venues, such as Boston where England play Ghana, have not seen the expected economic boost

US hotel chiefs are blaming a ‘Trump Slump’ for a downturn in bookings for the World Cup.

Key venues such as Boston, where England take on Ghana on June 23, have not seen the expected economic boost from the tournament. It is claimed that international visitors have been put off travel to the US.

Now, an expert in hospitality has said that he would be “surprised” if there was a last minute boost of international fans travelling to the US because of “the way everything is now”. And one hotel chief revealed that World Cup room holds have been returned, ‘without a single reservation’.

READ MORE: England fans fume after ANOTHER outrageous World Cup expense confirmed – ‘Disgusting’READ MORE: World Cup ‘beyond reach’ of most families as England superfan pays £20k for trip

Alan Fyall, professor at the University of Central Florida’s Rosen College of Hospitality Management, told Forbes business magazine: “I would be surprised if there’s a big influx of international fans at the last minute this time. It’s not so easy to get here at the last minute, the way everything is now.”

Jan Freitag, a national director at CoStar, the industry analytics firm, warned: “We are seeing much more muted optimism about the hotel results.” Harry Carr, Pivot Hotels & Resorts’ senior vice president, said FIFA returned some of the company’s room-block holds ‘without a single reservation’. He added: “We are much less bullish about the World Cup than we were three months ago.”

HRI Lodging’s Bay Area hotels chief commercial officer Lior Sekler, said the demand for reserved room blocks has been “very lacklustre”. Only 15 percent of FIFA’s reserved rooms were picked up.

Fans’ groups have criticised the soaring costs of tickets and hotels. Some host cities are not holding fan fests. The Football Supporters Association (FSA) described the costs of the World Cup – including the most expensive final ticket – as ‘absolutely staggering’.

Spokesman Thomas Concannon said: “It comes as no surprise after everything that has happened over the last few months. But the price final ticket is still absolutely staggering. I don’t know any supporters who can afford that. It is beyond the reach of ordinary fans.”

The FSA, which represents around 600,000 supporters across the UK, has been on a fact finding mission to the States and Mexico. Trains to the Boston venue, where England play Ghana on June 23, are rising from $20 to $80.

Garford Beck, 64, of London, has hardly missed an England game since 1980 and this summer will be his 8th World Cup. He manages the England fans’ team, which held a minute’s silence for former FA Chairman Lord David Triesman a their last game.

He warned that working-class fans were being ‘taken to the cleaners’ on everything from match tickets to shirts. He said: “They give so much to the game, yet the door is being closed on them. It is incredibly sad.”

New Jersey has dropped plans to hold one.

Lijnders made the comments after City’s 4-0 FA quarter-final win against Liverpool last weekend, with Guardiola unable to fulfill media duties as he was serving a touchline ban.

“You never replace a player with the same kind of player because they don’t exist,” said Lijnders.

“But every good story comes to an end, and I hope he enjoys the last months – there are only six weeks – and has a good farewell.”

Silva, a 2017 signing from French club Monaco, made his 450th appearance for City in the EFL Cup victory against Arsenal last month.

The 31-year-old was made club captain last summer following the departure of Kevin De Bruyne.

“He is not the tallest one, the most muscular one, or score 50 goals or make 50 assists a season,” said Guardiola.

“These are the type of players that are spotlighted and everyone talks about. From nine years, I know him quite well and for what a manager requires.

“All managers would say how much they love him because he is incredibly competitive, has a fire inside him always. In the toughest moments and on the biggest stages, he is always there.

“He has been an incredible signing for us, incredible. I love this club and I would love if he could stay and finish his career here but I do not know. He will decide what he will decide. It is his decision.”

First Lady Melania Trump gave a shock denial about having ties to Epstein in a statement that “blindsided” her husband President Trump, indicating they aren’t “aligned”, a psychologist tells the Mirror

Melania Trump has sent shockwaves through the White House after releasing a bombshell statement denying ties to Jeffrey Epstein – a move that reportedly left President Trump in the dark.

Now as the President juggles a precarious ceasefire deal with Iran, expert say the First Lady’s decision to “reclaim her authorship” proves now that the couple are operating on separate tracks.

The timing of the statement appears to have caught the White House off guard, with Trump telling a journalist he “didn’t know anything about” her statement, before adding “she didn’t know [Epstein]” and hanging up the call.

The First Lady said that online theories that Epstein introduced her to Donald were “mean-spirited attempts to defame my reputation,” adding: “The individuals lying about me are devoid of ethical standards, humility and respect.”

OPINION

Christopher Bucktin

In a move that distances herself from the White House, where many individuals are facing increased focus on their ties with the billionaire paedophile, she urged for Epstein survivors to be given the opportunity to speak at Congressional hearings, adding: “Then, and only then, we will have the truth.”

She also dismissed an email between herself and Epstein’s accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell as “casual correspondence”.

Melania’s statement, the timing of which is not entirely clear, indicates that the First Lady and the President are operating separately, an expert has told the Mirror.

Advertisement

Dr Jane Halsall, a Chartered Counselling Psychologist, described the move as a psychological “assertion of agency”, with the fact she didn’t seek his approval beforehand suggesting a relationship where “alignment is absent.”

“From a psychological perspective, the fact that Donald Trump was unaware of such a significant and emotionally charged statement by Melania Trump is very insightful into their relational dynamics,” Dr Halsall said “It raises important questions about communication, alignment, and autonomy within high-profile relationships.

“In close partnerships particularly those lived out in the public eye there is often an assumption of shared messaging and mutual awareness, especially around issues as sensitive as advocacy for victims. The fact that she didn’t seek approval or share her intentions shows how alignment is absent in their partnership and how both these powerful individuals are operating in parallel rather than in emotional synchrony. This doesn’t necessarily indicate dysfunction, but it may suggest a relationship where independence is prioritised over cohesion, or where communication is more strategic than intimate, something that is unusual for a couple in such a high profile position.”

Last year Trump’s long-time biographer Michael Wolff claimed the pair are essentially “separated.”

He told The Daily Beast podcast: “They clearly do not in any way inhabit a marriage as we define marriage. And I think maybe we can more specifically say they live separate lives.

“They are separated. The President of the United States and the First Lady are separated.”

Speculation surrounding the state of the couple’s marriage has been rife for years, with a source telling the Mirror in 2023 that the pair only ever came together for the occasional dinner at his Palm Beach mansion.

“Their paths barely cross,” a source told the Mirror after Stormy Daniels alleged that she had an affair with Trump

“Melania is no different to any woman. Having her husband accused of cheating on her not just once but twice is extremely disturbing. There is little wonder people believe it’s not just the criminal court Trump is heading to but possibly a divorce one too.”

Advisor to the First Lady Marc Beckman tried to clear up the cryptic statement, telling the New York Post that Melania “spoke out now because enough is enough”.

He added: “It is time for the public and media to focus on her incredible achievements as First Lady, the lives she has positively impacted, and her commitment to our nation.”

Trump has more than enough on his hands at the moment, as a proposed ceasefire in the US and Israel‘s war against Iran hangs in the balance.

It had been put forward that a two-week conditional ceasefire could take place, contingent on the re-opening of the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has forced closed in recent weeks – something that has caused global shocks across financial markets, and is set to see UK households feel a major hit as prices across the board are set to rise.

Even if the Strait reopened today, and stayed open, much of the financial damage by these shockwaves has already been done, but with Israel continuing to attack Lebanon, and peace talks due to take place over the weekend, the situation is precarious.

Last week, the White House hit back at rumours that the President had been rushed to hospital, with officials slamming the claims as a “conspiracy”.

Speculation has grown over the last year about the real state of the President’s health, from visibly bruised hands and swollen ankles as well as apparent facial paralysis at an event honouring 9/11 victims last September.

In the psychological expert’s view, Melania’s shock decision to speak out indicates that she felt the urge to take back control and exert some “agency” – and her choosing to do so without running it by her husband’s office shows just how important this was to her, and that she was not willing to run the “risk of being shut down”.

“Melania’s decision to speak in a way that advocated for the victims can be understood as an assertion of personal agency. Her desire to defend herself publicly was to reclaim some control and shift the narrative that she personally was in some way involved in the Epstein files. Would she have had the opportunity to share her voice if she had asked permission first? The fact she did not risk being shut down, shows how compelled she felt to get her words across and regain psychological coherence.”

Symbolically, amid the ongoing controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s high-profile connections and big name acquaintances – though appearing in the Epstein files is not necessarily a sign of wrongdoing, the emails and messages are littered with A-list names – Melania’s decision to speak out is huge, Dr Halsall explains and a “redefining” of the traditional role of First Lady altogether.

“In high-profile roles, silence is rarely neutral; it is often interpreted, projected onto, or even weaponised. As a result, her speaking out was about reclaiming authorship over her identity and letting the victims know that they have a powerful First Lady in their corner. In this context, her advocacy was a deliberate effort to realign how she is seen with what she believes, an act that, psychologically, reflects both self-protection and self-definition. Psychologically, this reflects a shift from a traditionally symbolic or supportive role and modernises the representation of the first lady into someone that is values led and self-directed. For someone in her position, that carries weight. It signals not just a stance on an issue, but a redefinition of identity within the relationship and in the public sphere.”

It also serves a reminder that even in a couple occupying such public positions, there are always “private dynamics” behind closed doors, and a constant tension between the two spheres playing out. “Moments like this highlight the psychological tension between unity and individuality in relationships under scrutiny. They remind us that even in the most visible partnerships, there are private dynamics at play where voice, power, and identity are continually being negotiated.”

READ MORE: From Ghislaine Maxwell email to photos – the Epstein links that Melania Trump denies

An email exchange from October 2002 between Melania and Ghislaine Maxwell was dubbed by the First Lady as “polite” and “casual”. The first email was sent by Melania and reads: “Dear GI How are you?

“Nice story about JE in NY mag. You look great on the picture. I know you are very busy flying all over the world. How was Palm Beach? I cannot wait to go down. Give me a call when you are back in NY. Have a great time! Love, Melania”

Maxwell replies in a similar tone, writing, “Sweet pea – thanks for your message. Actually plans changed again and I am now on my way back to NY. I leave again on Fri so I still do not think I have time to see you sadly. I will try and call though. Keep well Gx”

However there are other mentions of Melania in the Epstein files between the sex offender and those he corresponded with. One email from a redacted account sent shortly after Trump’s first presidential victory in 2016 reads: “I simply can not believe this victory..

“No one called it, we all thought she’d win. You must be happy tho. I remember flying back with Donald on his plane the first weekend I went to visit you in Florida was the weekend he met Melania and he kept on coming out of the bedroom saying ‘ wow what a hot piece of ass’

“Nuts. Anyway, hope you’re enjoying Saudi”

Another email sent by Epstein to Michael Wolff in December 2017 mentions ‘Melania’, “some journalists working a lead on a Melania boyfriend”.

Two further emails sent to Wolff in January 2018 reference ‘Melania’. The first, sent on 11 January reads: “holding up? . hi= sh**hole countries comment. his i will sign whatever is=put in front of me, clearly shows cracks in his mental state. = transcripts. could drive him over the edge if the=melania story doesnt come out”.

Another sent on 21 January that year sees the sex offender write, “achlles heal , melania, transcipt. melania also focused on dates of porn star, before birth of baron or after. . they also now have two army people escorting her to kids school :)”

Do you have a story to tell? Email: emma.mackenzie@reachplc.com

All four people in the property were able to make it out of the house safely

A house fire that “destroyed” a bedroom and caused “serious damage” to the upstairs of the property is believed to have been started by a candle. Firefighters from Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue were called to the scene of a house fire in March.

When they arrived at the property, they found a bedroom fully engulfed in fire. Crews from March, Wisbech, and Chatteris helped to contain the fire.

The crews stopped the fire from spreading further and were able to extinguish it. There were four people in the property at the time of the fire but they were all able to make it out of the house before the crews arrived.

Station Commander Clive Allen said: “The fire is believed to have been caused by a curtain blowing onto a lit candle. We would like to remind people to always remain vigilant when lighting candles. Our advice for the safe use of candles is to never leave them unattended and keep them in a draught-free area away from curtains, furniture and other flammable surfaces. Alternatively, you could use LED candles as a safer option.

“Thankfully the occupants had working smoke alarms on each floor of the house which is exactly what we would advise people to warn you of a fire in your home. We also recommend you test all smoke alarms in your home once a month to ensure they are working properly. If you need a reminder to test your alarm, you can sign up to get an email from us every month to give you that nudge.”

To get more news and top stories delivered directly to your phone, join our new WhatsApp community. Click this link to receive your daily dose of CambridgeshireLive content.

We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

The new service will be available 24/7 across Asda stores

Asda has launched a new service across 700 of its stores which is designed to “make life easier” for customers. The supermarket has announced it will be installing self‑service laundry machines across its stores, meaning Asda customers will now be able to do a wash while they are shopping.

The new laundry units will be installed at a range of Asda Supercentres, Superstores, supermarkets and Express sites from May, and will look to give customers a quick, convenient and great‑value way to wash and dry their clothes while they shop.

The units will offer 9kg and 20kg drum capacities as well as energy-efficient cycles and high-speed drying. The machines will also be available to be used by shoppers 24/7.

Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. And don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.

Joseph Sutton, Vice President Asda Express, foodservice and fuel, said: “We’re always looking for new ways to make life easier for the customers who shop with us, particularly by strengthening the breadth of services that meet their needs under one roof.

“This large‑scale rollout of Wash.ME units gives customers a quick, convenient and great‑value way to tackle their laundry while they shop. We’re pleased to be working with ME Group on this significant partnership and look forward to seeing the benefits it brings to customers across the UK.”

Commenting on the new partnership with Asda, Vladimir Crasneanscki, Deputy Chief Executive Officer of ME Group, added: “Asda is a perfect company to partner with, their retail and petrol stations are excellent locations for our services and their innovative and fast paced approach will enable us to deploy our units rapidly. We are delighted to announce this partnership; this is the largest single client deal in the history of our laundry division and demonstrates the growing demand for our services.

“The rapid expansion of our Wash.ME laundry services is a key strategic priority for the Group, driven by strong consumer demand. In 2025, we announced a record number of Wash.ME machine installations of 1,326 across our geographies, and we have clear ambitions to continue building on this progress. This partnership is indicative of our intention to further cement our UK market-leading position in the unattended laundry segment.”

ITV viewers have begged bosses to bring back the hit show two years after the show went off air

Advertisement

ITV audiences have pleaded with bosses to bring back what they say is ‘the best thing on TV’ following a two-year absence.

The broadcaster sparked excitement among fans after posting a video to its official Instagram page featuring Ant McPartlin and Declan Donnelly presenting their first and final instalment of their popular programme Saturday Night Takeaway.

Saturday Night Takeaway initially debuted in 2002, with the programme taking a hiatus in 2009, before making its comeback four years afterwards in 2013.

Throughout its run, it has garnered numerous honours, including Bafta and National Television Awards (NTA) recognition, reports the Mirror.

Following six years on TV, Ant and Dec revealed they would be stepping away from the programme – describing it as the “perfect time to pause for a little while and catch our breath”.

Advertisement

READ MORE: I’m A Celebrity fans issue same complaint over ‘missing’ starsREAD MORE: I’m a Celebrity’s Gemma Collins opens up on ‘weird’ moment with weight loss jabs

During that period, they concluded their final series on a triumphant note, featuring numerous adrenaline-fuelled challenges, amusing hidden camera pranks, fresh studio entertainment, and spontaneous surprises.

The presenting pair did not specify when or whether it would ever make a return. Now two years since it vanished from our screens, television enthusiasts have urged ITV to contemplate a revival following their social media upload.

Expressing their response in the comments area, one supporter stated: “Bring it back soon.” Another declared: “Bring Saturday night takeaway back next year! @itv.”

A third remarked: “We need this back ASAP.” Meanwhile one asserted: “Probably was the best thing on TV at the time.” Another speculated: “This makes me think it’s coming back.” One agreed: “I think it’s coming back.” One said: “I wish they would bring it back, it’s a great show.”

One fan insisted: “Bring Saturday night takeaway back next year!” Another joked: “My children and I mourn this show..bring…it….back.” Meanwhile one added: “Need this back.. best thing on TV.”

In a previous interview with Fault magazine, Ant addressed the reasoning behind the programme’s hiatus. He said: “Part of the reason we’re pausing Takeaway is we need a break ourselves, and we need to spend some time with our family. We’ve both got children that we need to spend time with for a little bit.”

He continued: “We need time to think and, and time to step back and look at the bigger picture and just see where we are now. Like I say, we’re turning 49, and what do we want to do next? What’s the next phase of our career?”

The television personality went on: “And we’ve got lots of ideas and lots of offers on the table, lots of options of things we can do. But it’s working on what we do next and where the next chapter begins.

“So that’s what we’re gonna do when Saturday Night Takeaway is out of the way. We’ll sit down, take a bit of time, and re-evaluate everything.”

You can stream Saturday Night Takeaway on ITVX