Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney took aim at Air Canada CEO’s Wednesday, accusing him of showing a lack of compassion and judgement in his condolences after Sunday’s deadly crash in New York.

Air Canada CEO Michael Rousseau has been summoned to testify at Parliament’s official languages committee after he shared a four-minute condolence video online that only included two French words: “bonjour” and “merci.”

Antoine Forest, one of the two pilots killed in the crash at LaGuardia airport, was a French-speaking Quebecer.

Forest and Mackenzie Gunther died when the Air Canada Jazz flight they were landing at LaGuardia collided with a fire truck on the runway Sunday evening.

Air Canada is headquartered in Montreal, Quebec, where French is the primary language. Rousseau has been criticized for not speaking French previously. He delivered his condolence video message in English, with French subtitles.

“We proudly live in a bilingual country. There are two official languages here and Air Canada has a special responsibility whatever the situation to communicate whatever the situation in both official languages,” Carney said.

“I am extremely disappointed by the message released by the CEO of Air Canada. It shows a lack of compassion, and we will be closely following his comments before the official languages committee as well as the comments coming from the board of Air Canada.”

Quebec’s identity has been contentious since the 1760s when the British completed their takeover of what was then called New France. Quebec is about 80% French-speaking.

A spokesperson for Air Canada didn’t immediately respond to a message seeking comment.

The Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages has received hundreds of complaints about Rousseau’s video.

“I don’t want to make political hay over what remains a tragedy with people still in hospital, but this isn’t the first time that he’s been told to speak French and he should know better,” said Marc Miller, the Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture.

Industry Minister Mélanie Joly said a lot of the victims and their families are francophones and said Rousseau’s video lacked empathy. “It is a question of moral leadership,” Joly said.

Carney said Canadian officials continue to work in close collaboration with their American counterparts to determine how this crash happened.

The language of power often reveals more than it intends. In a rare moment of candour on March 7, the US president, Donald Trump, described the confrontation with Iran as “a big chess game at a very high level … I’m dealing with very smart players … high-level intellect. High, very high-IQ people.”

If Iran is, by Trump’s own admission, a “high-level” opponent, then the sudden revival of a 15-point plan previously rejected by Iran a year ago suggests a disconnect between how the adversary is understood and how it is being approached. It’s a plan already examined in negotiation by Iran and dismissed as unrealistic and coercive. Despite this, the Trump administration is once again framing the “roadmap” as a pathway to de-escalation. Tehran has once again dismissed the gambit as Washington “negotiating with itself – reinforcing the perception that the US is attempting to impose terms rather than negotiate them.

The US president is right about one thing – Iran is not an opponent that can be easily dismissed or overwhelmed. Trump’s own description is a tacit acknowledgement that this is a far more capable and complex adversary than those the US has faced in past Middle Eastern wars, such as Iraq. And that is why the odds are increasingly stacked against the United States and Israel.

This conflict reflects a familiar but flawed imperial assumption: that overwhelming military force can compensate for strategic misunderstanding. The US and Israel appear to have misjudged not only Iran’s capabilities, but the political, economic and historical terrain on which this war is being fought.

Unlike Iraq, Iran is a deeply embedded and adaptable regional power. It has resilient institutions, networks of influence, and the capacity to impose asymmetric costs across multiple theatres. It knows how to manage maximum pressure.

The most immediate problem is lack of legitimacy. This war has authorisation from neither the United Nations or, in the case of America, the US Congress. Further, US intelligence assessments indicate Iran was not rebuilding its nuclear programme following earlier strikes – contradicting one of Washington’s justifications for war. The resignation of Joe Kent as head of the National Counterterrorism Center on March 17, was even more revealing. In his resignation letter Kent insisted that Iran posed no imminent threat.

This effectively collapses one of the original narratives underpinning the US decision to start the war – a further blow to legitimacy.

À lire aussi :
Iran war lacks strategy, goals, legitimacy and support – in the US and around the world

A majority of Americans oppose the war, reflecting deep fatigue after Iraq and Afghanistan – hardly ideal conditions for what increasingly looks like another “forever war” in the Middle East. Current polling shows Trump’s Republicans trailing the Democrats ahead of the all-important midterm elections in November.

The war is both militarily uncertain and politically unsustainable. International allied support is also eroding. The United Kingdom — often trumpeted as Washington’s closest partner — has limited itself to defensive coordination, while Germany and France have distanced themselves from offensive operations. European allies also declined a US request to deploy naval forces to secure the strait of Hormuz. This reflects not just disagreement, but a deeper loss of trust in US leadership and strategic judgement.

US influence has long depended on legitimacy as much as force. That reservoir is now rapidly draining. Global confidence is falling, while images of civilian casualties — including over 160 schoolchildren killed in an airstrike on the first day of the war – have shocked international onlookers. Rather than reinforcing leadership, this war is accelerating its erosion.

Israel faces a parallel crisis of legitimacy – one that began in Gaza and has now deepened. The war in Gaza severely damaged its global standing, with sustained civilian casualties and humanitarian devastation drawing unprecedented criticism, even among traditional allies. This confrontation with Iran compounds that decline.

Striking Iran during active negotiations — for the second time — reinforces the perception that escalation is preferred over diplomacy. The issue is no longer just conduct, but credibility.

Strategic failure, narrative defeat

The conduct of the war compounds the problem. The assassinations of Iranian leaders, framed as tactical victories, are strategic failures. They have unified rather than destabilised Iran. Mass pro-regime demonstrations illustrate how external aggression can consolidate internal legitimacy.

The issue is no longer just the conduct of the war, but the credibility of the conflict itself. Regardless of how impressive the US and Israeli military are, it doesn’t compensate for reputational collapse. When building support for a conflict like this – domestically and internationally – legitimacy is a strategic asset. Once eroded across multiple conflicts, it is extraordinarily difficult to rebuild.

Rather than stabilising the system, US actions are fragmenting it. Allies are distancing themselves, adversaries are adapting, and neutral states are hedging.

The most decisive factor may be economic. The war is already destabilising global markets – driving up oil prices, inflation, and volatility at levels that combine the effects of 1970s and Ukraine war oil shocks.

This is a war that cannot be contained geographically nor economically. The deployment of 2,500 US marines to the Middle East (and reports that up to another 3,000 paratroopers will also be sent), reportedly with plans to secure Kharg Island – and with it Iran’s most important oil infrastructure – would be a dangerous escalation.

For Gulf states, the assumption that the US can guarantee security is increasingly questioned. Some states are reportedly now looking to diversify their partnerships and turning toward China and Russia, mirroring post-Iraq shifts, when US failure opened space for alternative powers.

Iran holds the cards

Wars are not won by destroying capabilities alone, but by securing sustainable and legitimate political outcomes. On both counts, the US and Israel are falling short.

Iran, by contrast, does not need military victory. It only needs to endure, impose costs, and outlast its adversaries. This is the logic of asymmetric conflict: the weaker power wins by not losing, while the stronger one loses when the costs of continuing become unsustainable.

This dynamic is already visible. Having escalated rapidly, Trump now appears to be searching for an off-ramp — reviving proposals and signalling openness to negotiation. But he is doing so from a position of diminishing leverage. In contrast, Iran’s ability to threaten energy flows, absorb pressure, and shape the tempo of escalation means it increasingly holds key strategic cards. The longer the war continues, the more that balance tilts.

Empires rarely recognise when they begin to lose. They escalate, double down, and insist victory is near. But by the time the costs become undeniable – economic crisis, political fragmentation, global isolation – it is already too late. The US and Israel may win battles. But they may be losing the war that matters: legitimacy, stability and long-term influence.

And, as history suggests, that loss may not only define the limits of their power, but mark a broader shift in how power itself is judged, constrained, and resisted.

Since 2019, inspectors ruled that the authority had made unreasonable decisions on 38 occasions — the second-highest number in the country, an investigation found.

The “unreasonable” ruling by the Planning Inspectorate is taken when it overturns a decision made by a council and awards costs to the appellant because an authority fails to follow planning policy, imposes unreasonable conditions, or it wastes time or money.

The  investigation by Sky News found that only Cornwall Council had made more unreasonable decisions  since 2019 than North Yorkshire.

Earlier this year, inspectors ruled against North Yorkshire Council after it rejected plans for up to 200 homes in Peasey Hills, Malton.

The inspector concluded: “The council’s protracted catalogue of failings amounts to unreasonable behaviour that has caused the appellant unnecessary or wasted expense in respect of pursuing the appeal.”

Last year, the council’s actions were again deemed unreasonable when it refused listed building consent for a new access gate and drive at St Trinian’s Hall, in Richmond.

In response to the figures, North Yorkshire Council’s head of development management, Martin Grainger, said the authority would continue to support “positive development across the county, where appropriate”.

He added: “This is evidenced by the number of positive decisions we have issued on planning applications, which exceeds the national average for similar English unitary authorities.

“The figures quoted in this report must be viewed in context. As the country’s largest geographical council, we handle more planning applications than most authorities.

“In 2024/25 alone, we made decisions on about 4,700 applications – compared with the national average of 1,365 for other English unitary authorities.

“Replicated over seven years, that level of demand would equate to more than 32,000 applications – meaning the ‘unreasonable decisions’ quoted represents just 0.1 per cent of all cases we deal with.”

Mr Grainger said the figures quoted spanned a seven-year period and pre-dated local government reorganisation and the launch of North Yorkshire Council in April 2023.

The investigation has been published as North Yorkshire Council comes under increasing pressure to meet government targets for new housing.

Senior councillors have criticised a target of around 4,200 new homes a year — up from 1,384 — which they say puts unprecedented pressure on rural land in the county.

What is lycopene?

OK, but why tinned tomatoes?

Whether you’re hiking up a mountain, heading to the shops or commuting on the train to work, having the best backpack is essential. Formerly only used by schoolchildren, backpacks have become a must-have for everyone, replacing the briefcase as an essential part of every office worker’s arsenal, but they’re also a serious fashion accessory nowadays.

“Backpacks have undergone a seismic reinvention over the last decade, from functional Karrimors for Duke of Edinburgh Award outings to luxurious pieces of kit,” explains Telegraph men’s style editor, Stephen Doig. “They’re now a key part of any sophisticated wardrobe.”

The very best backpacks can save you having to trundle around the airport with a suitcase (and packing cubes can help to cram more in). If you’re heading up into the hills, a good hiking backpack is a lifesaver. Here are my favourite backpacks for commuting to work and meandering in the countryside.

The best backpacks: At a glance

Spain manager Luis de la Fuente believes Arsenal have the second-best midfielder in the world behind Manchester City star Rodri.

Rodri has been one of the most influential players in world football over the past decade, helping Man City win four Premier League titles, four domestic cups and the Champions League.

The 29-year-old won the Ballon d’Or in 2024, becoming the first Manchester City player to win the award and just the second male Spanish player.

De la Fuente believes Rodri is the ‘best in the world’ in his position but insists his Spain teammate Martin Zubimendi is not far behind.

Zubimendi has enjoyed an impressive first season at Arsenal following his move from Real Sociedad, helping the Gunners move nine points clear at the top of the Premier League and challenge in two other competitions.

Mikel Arteta’s £60m summer signing will compete with Rodri for a place in the Spain team at this summer’s World Cup but De la Fuente insists they could ‘play together’ as the European champions look for more silverware.

‘After all the setbacks he went through, Rodri is back at a high level,’ De la Fuente told TVE ahead of Spain’s friendly against Serbia on Friday night.

‘I’ve said before that he is the best in the world, but also on those same occasions [when he was injured] that we are very fortunate.

‘After all, in that position, the number 6 role, we have the two best players in the world: Rodri and Martin [Zubimendi].

‘So I will get ahead of a question you are probably going to ask: can they play together? Of course they can play together.

‘We can play that way [with a double pivot] perfectly well. In my idea of football, they [Rodri and Zubimendi] may occupy a similar role, but they are different players with different characteristics.

‘In fact, Martin is getting into the box more now and scoring goals, but he also has the qualities of a positional player, with balance and outstanding tactical awareness.

‘Rodri has those same qualities too, so having them there gives us security, that kind of structure.

Marie O’Gorman and Mary McGuire targeted seven victims who were under their care at Nazareth House between 1975 and 1981

Advertisement

Two former nuns who subjected children as young as three to physical abuse using belts and slippers at a Scottish children’s home have avoided prison sentences.

Marie O’Gorman, 79, and Mary McGuire, 68, assaulted seven youngsters in their care at Nazareth House in Glasgow’s Cardonald district between 1975 and 1981. The pair appeared before Glasgow Sheriff Court on Wednesday for sentencing, having admitted guilt to multiple charges in February.

O’Gorman, known to the children as Sister Mary Aelred, joined the Sisters of Nazareth congregation in 1963 and was responsible for supervising groups of 10 to 12 children. Throughout her time there, she mistreated three youngsters aged between three and 11 years old, reports the Daily Record.

The court was told she repeatedly hit the children with objects including a harness, slipper and belt. One victim suffered particularly cruel treatment, being made to stand in a cold bath while O’Gorman poured water over her head as punishment for bedwetting.

The child’s ordeal continued as she was then forced to wear a nappy and parade in front of others. O’Gorman also attacked a second child while he was bathing. McGuire, who joined the congregation in 1975, was known to the children as Sister Maria Bernadette.

She confessed to assaulting five youngsters, aged between five and 12, hitting them with objects such as a slipper, a leather belt and a wooden hairbrush. During one particularly vicious incident, a child sustained an injury when the belt buckle struck her eye, leaving her bruised. Both nuns received probation orders on Wednesday, March 25.

McGuire, from Fife, was put under supervision for two years and instructed to complete 225 hours of unpaid work over the next 12 months. O’Gorman, from Dublin, was similarly put under supervision for the same duration.

Each woman was instructed to pay £1,000 compensation to every one of their victims. This represents the most recent case of historical abuse involving nuns from the Sisters of Nazareth.

Carol Buirds, 75, received her sentence in January along with Eileen McElhinney, 78, and Dorothy Kane, 68, for the appalling abuse of children that occurred at two homes in Lasswade and Kilmarnock, spanning 1972 to 1981. Buirds, from Wallsend, Tyne and Wear, was jailed for 15 months. McElhinney, from Bishopbriggs, East Dunbartonshire, received a 12-month Probation Order and was instructed to complete 240 hours of unpaid work.

Want to see more of the stories you love from Belfast Live? Making us your preferred source on Google means you’ll get more of our exclusives… To add Belfast Live as a preferred source, simply click here.

Procurator Fiscal Fraser Gibson, from the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, stated: “Marie O’Gorman and Mary McGuire were trusted to care for vulnerable children who had almost no support and relied entirely on the adults around them for safety and compassion. Instead of offering that care, they caused them profound and lasting harm.

“It is now a matter of public record that, while working at Nazareth House, both individuals gravely abused the authority and trust placed in them Their offending may have taken place several decades ago, but this type of abuse has never been acceptable and should not have happened.

“The Crown treats all allegations of non‐recent child abuse with the utmost seriousness, and no matter how much time has passed, we remain committed to ensuring survivors are heard and perpetrators held accountable.”

Chief Inspector Grieve insisted the public should remain vigilant and cautious around roadways and main thoroughfares.

As we welcome longer days and dare, I say it, some more favourable weather, I wish to inform you of some activity and focus we are undertaking and have planned around the area of Road Safety.

Naturally, streets and towns become busier with pedestrian footfall and cyclists as the days extend, and daylight affords more opportunities for outdoor activities.

It is, important, however, we all remain vigilant and cautious around roadways and main thoroughfares.

In consultation with our local Roads Policing Inspector Tom Mallinson, we are looking at strong and focussed collaboration to ensure the national approach is consistently delivered on a local level.

READ MORE: POLICE COLUMN: Chief Superintendent Gregg Banks

The National Motorcycle campaign commenced on March 20. This focusses on rider safety, improving driver and rider behaviour, reducing collisions and raising awareness.

Of particular interest within the local area is Illegal, off-road motorcycle activity. This is an issue that is brought to my attention on a regular basis.

Understandably, residents are concerned about the dangers and anti-social nature of this activity, that often comes with damage to property to facilitate it.

My community team are working hard to gather information to bring offenders to task. This will also involve utilising opportunities to seize motorcycles and report the drivers responsible.

READ MORE: POLICE COLUMN: Detective Chief Inspector Barry McDaid

The consequences of this can be severe and lead to losing your driving licence or ability to carry one. This affects your professional and personal aspirations, so I would encourage anyone involved to think carefully about potential repercussions.

In consultation with partners, priority concerns and solutions are discussed. This allows us to co-ordinate our approach to sites of concern with road safety planners and key stakeholders, also utilising national resources from the National Motorcycle Unit and Safety Camera Partnership.

Much like West Lothian itself, the road network throughout the region is extremely varied. While we have routes primarily transecting and connection our urban towns, including linking to both the M8 and M9 motorways; we also have a number of rural roads.

Regardless of the type of road, our approach remains consistent – we must educate the public about risks and consequences associated with the Fatal Five categories, including drink/drug driving, driving while distracted and driving without using a seatbelt. Where appropriate we will take enforcement action against those who chose to flout legislation and place themselves and others at risk on the road network.

READ MORE: POLICE COLUMN: Chief Inspector Dougie Grieve

Our approach is not limited to those utilising automated vehicles, and we know that maximising the safety of more vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists, and horse riders.

As such we continue to provide these groups with vital information about staying visible and safe and urging motorists to keep these road users in mind when behind the wheel.

More information can be found by visiting https://roadsafety.scot and on our social media publications.

This is the first report I have made to you around bespoke approaches into a single area of business. I wish to continue this through the year as we continue to work alongside the communities and relevant partners to address the varied issues affecting West Lothian with a view to achieving long term sustainable solutions.

READ MORE: Historic West Lothian nursery building dodges another demolition attempt

Don’t miss the latest news from the West Lothian Courier. Sign up to our free newsletter here.

​Bosses at the NHS Trust that runs Scarborough Hospital have said they are “really pleased” with an improved CQC rating from requires improvement to good for medical care and the re-rating of urgent and emergency care as requires improvement.

​The overall rating for Scarborough Hospital remains requires improvement.

​Clare Smith, chief executive of the York and Scarborough Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, welcomed the news while noting that “there is still work to do”.

​Speaking at a board meeting on Wednesday, March 25, she said: “We’ve seen improvements and the change of classification to good in the medicine domain, so I’m really pleased for them.

​“Of course, there is still work to do. I really want to thank all my colleagues, as it’s always a nerve-racking time during inspections – this one lasted three days, so thank you to them for all their efforts and ongoing commitment.”

​An inspection was carried out in October at Scarborough Hospital – the trust’s second largest hospital with 277 beds – as part of the CQC’s continual checks on the safety and quality of services.

​The report also identified areas for further improvement, including governance, ongoing challenges relating to training for medical staff, and the handling of complaints.

​However, across all areas visited, inspectors observed that staff interactions with patients and their loved ones were consistently warm, respectful and compassionate.

​Chair of the trust, Martin Barkley, said: “I’m really pleased for the medical care group in Scarborough for the improvement.”

​Karen Knapton, CQC deputy director of operations in the north, said: “At this inspection, we were pleased to find a number of improvements had been made in medical care since our last visit.

​“However, further improvements were needed in both medical care as well as urgent and emergency care. It was also disappointing that issues we highlighted at the previous inspection, still hadn’t been addressed and new breaches were found.

​“In medical care, more work was needed to improve the delays for people waiting for some specialist treatment, particularly for cardiology and respiratory conditions. These are high-risk conditions where people’s health can deteriorate rapidly without specialist support. Leaders were aware of the issues and were taking action to address them.

“However, it was positive to find there’d been sustained improvements in how staff were completing risk assessments and escalating risks appropriately to keep people safe. They were also discussing people’s care needs with them, to ensure they could be included in any decisions about their care.

​“In urgent and emergency care, it was concerning that people couldn’t always access care, support and treatment when they needed it. At the time of the inspection, the number of people admitted, transferred or discharged within four hours of arrival was 62 per cent, which was worse than the England average.”

​Dr Karen Stone, medical director at the York and Scarborough NHS Trust, said: “We welcome the CQC’s report and are pleased it recognises the improvements we’ve made, particularly in our medical care services. It’s reassuring that inspectors saw the compassionate, person-centred care our colleagues provide every day.

​“The report also clearly sets out where we must continue to improve. We acknowledge the pressures our teams are working under, particularly within urgent and emergency care, where access, patient flow and ambulance handover performance must improve, and in medical care where some patients have experienced delays in accessing specialist support.”

Water poverty in the region could “worsen significantly” under current forecasts, with an estimated 17,800 pensioner households already spending more than 3 per cent of their income on water, according to Independent Age. 

That figure is expected to rise to 8 per cent by 2029/30 if no action is taken.

Joanna Elson CBE, chief executive of Independent Age, said: “Water bills are continuing to soar, and behind the statistics, there are real people making drastic cutbacks to reduce their costs.

“We have heard from older people washing in sinks, letting dishes pile up over days, and avoiding flushing the toilet.

“This should not be happening.”

In response, Independent Age has launched a petition calling on the UK Government to introduce a national social tariff for water to support low-income households.

Ms Elson said: “Please add your voice to our campaign calling on the UK Government to implement a national social tariff for water in England and Wales.

“This will protect low-income households from rising water bills and put an end to the unfair postcode lottery that blights the lives of those living in areas with less generous schemes.

“It’s clear that the current system of each water company providing their own social tariff is no longer fit for purpose.

“Where you live shouldn’t determine how much financial support you receive.”

She emphasised the urgency of the situation as part of the wider cost-of-living crisis.

Ms Elson said: “The UK Government says that tackling the cost of living is its top priority.

“If that’s true, it must take meaningful action to address the growing crisis of water affordability.

“Water is not a luxury – it is a necessity.

“No one should be forced to ration it.”

A national social tariff, the charity argues, would offer standardised financial relief for people of all ages on low incomes across England and Wales.

The scheme could lift between 292,000 and 578,000 older people out of water poverty.

The call comes after the UK Government’s January 2026 white paper did not adopt the Independent Water Commission’s recommendation for a national social tariff.

Instead, individual water companies continue to manage their own support schemes, which Independent Age argues creates an inconsistent and unfair ‘postcode lottery.’

Recent YouGov polling commissioned by the charity found that around one in five people in England and Wales are reducing water usage because of costs.

Of those, a third said it was harming their health, and nearly the same proportion reported it negatively affecting their personal hygiene.

One Northumberland pensioner, 80-year-old Margaret, described the daily impact.

She said: “To keep our water bills down, we only take quick showers – never baths – and we try not to let the water run for more than three minutes.

“Things never used to be so difficult, but our savings and private pensions have run out.

“Now we rely solely on our State Pension, and we’re living on the breadline.”

The full petition and further information are available on the Independent Age website.