A tiny Suffolk village is to hold a crunch meeting within days to ask residents whether it should launch a Piddington-style independence referendum in protest at government plans to house 1,250 asylum seekers at a nearby military base.
A delegation from Barnham travelled to the trailblazing Oxfordshire village last night to learn from the high-profile poll there that garnered international attention.
The five-strong team, led by parish council chairman John Bauer, have now decided to hold a special parish meeting within a fortnight to discuss holding an in/out vote and other measures it can use to highlight its plight.
The urgency is due to the speed at which Labour is trying to push the scheme through as it tries to move migrants from expensive hotels.
Details only emerged in June and a decision is expected this autumn, with asylum seekers potentially moving in by Christmas.
Mr Bauer told the Daily Mail: ‘The whole exercise is because people in Barnham and Piddington feel that the democratic process, as far as the asylum seekers accommodation process is concerned, just wasn’t working.
‘When we heard about it, it was quite shocking because we were being asked about something that hadn’t yet been passed on to us by the Government.
‘We knew nothing, the district council knew nothing, the county council knew nothing and the MPs knew nothing. That is not how the democratic process should work.’
RAF Barnham could have at least 1,250 asylum seekers by Christmas
The delegation to Piddington included another parish councillor, Conservative district councillor Andrew Smith, who is chairman of its development control committee, and two villagers who will be able to devote significant personal time to setting up a referendum or other measures.
‘We will be putting a proposal to them [villagers] which could well include a referendum and if there’s an appetite for that. If there is then a yes, we will go ahead,’ Mr Bauer said.
The meeting will have Piddington Parish Council chairman Tim McNally as a guest to explain his community’s approach to plans for asylum seekers’ accommodation in his area.
It is also expected to launch a ‘skills audit’ similar to one carried out in Piddington which identified what expertise individuals can bring to the resistance.
Mr Bauer, 66, said: ‘I don’t think the Government are listening to us. The fact they’ve taken this very high-handed route without even informing their MPs and they’re using the urgent Crown Development route [where applications are decided by the Secretary of State] to get it through with indecent haste I think means they aren’t listening.
‘But something like the referendum that Piddington has given them pause for thought.’
The village, which only learned of the plans in June, is considering a Piddington-style independence referendum
The vote in Piddington earlier this month over Home Office plans for MoD Bicester saw 90 per cent of locals opt to secede from the UK.
Barnham, which has around 580 residents, would see the population more than double if the plan to accommodate asylum seekers is given the go-ahead.
This ratio could be even greater after details of a private meeting between Home Office officials and councillors in Norfolk, which borders RAF Barnham, were leaked in which the Government department admitted ‘a lot more’ migrants could be housed at the facilities than had been admitted.
The village has a hall, church and primary school but no other amenities such as a shop or pub where migrants – who will be able to come and go from the base as they please – will be able to spend time.
Protests have taken place outside RAF Barnham since the controversial plans for the base, as well as the one in Bicester and a third site in Linton-on-Ouse, North Yorkshire, were announced three months ago.
Violent disorder also broke out over several nights two miles away from Barnham in Thetford, Norfolk, last month, after it emerged the Home Office was looking to quadruple the number of asylum seekers placed in private accommodation.
Until now, Barnham has relied on an ‘evidential’ approach involving planning issues such as environmental concerns.
Protesters gather outside RAF Barnham in July
The base was once used to store nuclear and chemical weapons and there are concerns the land could be contaminated.
The site is also a nesting ground for stone curlews, a species of bird so endangered that any development within 1,500m is forbidden.
Locals were vocal in their opposition to the Home Office’s plans at Barnham’s last parish council meeting.
Mother-of-two Collette Skelly, 58, who has lived in the village for 15 years and was at the meeting, said: ‘It’s a good way of raising publicity.
‘At the moment, there is nothing on the news about Barnham. So Piddington had to do it as a publicity stunt to raise attention.’
A man in his 60s added: ‘It’s on the news, they’re questioning the Prime Minister about Piddington today, so it’s working, isn’t it. I’d absolutely support it.’
Adrian Whittle, the leader of Reform UK at West Suffolk Council, declared he would support the village’s right to hold a referendum.
‘It raises the profile that people haven’t just given up, they want their country back, they want their lives back,’ he said.
An aerial view of part of the base at MoD Bicester
Some were concerned that it would become a distraction from the formal planning approach to blocking the scheme.
James Hollins said: ‘The referendum is rubbish, it can’t go anywhere, it’s got no legal standing.
‘We can demonstrate but they’re not going to listen.’
Announcing the referendum result on Wednesday last week, Piddington Parish Council chairman Mr McNally said: ‘We have given a message to the world.’
Vice-chair Susannah Parden added: ‘We are Piddington, the village that roars.’
Tory home affairs spokesman Chris Philp said the vote should be a ‘wake-up call’ for the government.




You must be logged in to post a comment Login