Connect with us

NewsBeat

Trust in US health agencies appears to be eroding

Published

on

Trust in US health agencies appears to be eroding

NEW YORK (AP) — Since Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was sworn in to lead the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services one year ago, he has defended his upending of federal health policy by saying the changes will restore trust in America’s public health agencies.

But as the longtime leader of the anti-vaccine movement scales back immunization guidance and dismisses scientists and advisers, he’s clashed with top medical groups who say he’s not following the science.

The confrontation is deepening confusion among the public that had already surged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surveys show trust in the agencies Kennedy leads is falling, rather than rising, as the country’s health landscape undergoes dramatic change.

Kennedy says he’s aiming to boost transparency to empower Americans to make their own health choices. Doctors counter that the false and unverified information he’s promoting is causing major, perhaps irreversible, damage — and that if enough people forgo vaccination, it will cause a surge of illness and death.

Advertisement

There was a time when people trusted health agencies regardless of party and the government reported “the best of what science knows at this point,” said Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.

“Now, you cannot confidently go to federal websites and know that,” she said.

HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon argued that trust had suffered during the Biden administration. “Kennedy’s mandate is to restore transparency, scientific rigor, and accountability,” he said.

Trust slid during the COVID pandemic

Historically, federal scientific and public health agencies enjoyed strong ratings in public opinion polls. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for decades scored above many other government agencies in Gallup surveys that asked whether they were doing a “good” or “excellent” job.

Advertisement

Two decades ago, more than 60% of Americans gave the CDC high marks, according to Gallup. But that number fell dramatically at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, amid agency mistakes and guidance that some people didn’t like.

In 2020, the percentage of Americans who believed the CDC was doing at least a “good” job fell to 40% and then leveled off for the next few years.

Alix Ellis, a hairstylist and mom in Madison, Georgia, used to fully trust the CDC and other health agencies but lost that confidence during the COVID-19 pandemic. She said some of the guidance didn’t make sense. At her salon, for example, stylists could work directly on someone’s hair, but others in the room had to be several feet away.

“I’m not saying that we were lied to, but that is when I was like, OK, ‘Why are we doing this?’” the 35-year-old said.

Advertisement

Kennedy helped create the trust problem, doctor says

Part of Kennedy’s pitch as health secretary has been restoring Americans’ trust in public health.

“We’re going to tell them what we know, we’re going to tell them what we don’t know, and we’re going to tell them what we’re researching and how we’re doing it,” Kennedy told senators last September, while explaining how he intended to make the CDC’s information reliable. “It’s the only way to restore trust in the agency — by making it trustworthy.”

Before entering politics, Kennedy was one of the loudest voices spreading false information about immunizations. Now, he’s trying to fix a trust problem he helped create, said Dr. Rob Davidson, a Michigan emergency physician.

“You fed those people false information to create the distrust, and now you’re sweeping into power and you’re going to cure the distrust by promoting the same disinformation,” said Davidson, who runs a doctor group called the Committee to Protect Health Care. “It’s upside-down.”

Advertisement

Kennedy has wielded the power of his office to take multiple steps that diverge from medical consensus.

Last May, he announced COVID-19 vaccines were no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women, a move doctors called concerning and confusing.

In November, he directed the CDC to abandon its position that vaccines do not cause autism, without supplying new evidence. And earlier this year, the CDC under his leadership reduced the number of vaccines recommended for every child, a decision medical groups said would undermine protections against a half-dozen diseases.

Kennedy also has overhauled his department through canceled grants and mass layoffs. Last summer, Kennedy fired his new CDC chief after less than a month over disagreements about vaccine policy.

Advertisement

Confusion emerges as trust erodes

Some have applauded the moves. But surveys suggest many Americans have had the opposite reaction.

“I have much less trust,” said Mark Rasmussen, a 67-year-old retiree walking into a mall in Danbury, Connecticut, one recent morning.

Shocked by Kennedy’s dismantling of public health norms, professional medical groups have urged Americans not to follow new vaccine recommendations they say were adopted without public input or compelling evidence.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, along with more than 200 public health and advocacy groups, urged Congress to investigate how and why Kennedy changed the vaccine schedule. The American Medical Association, working with the University of Minnesota’s Vaccine Integrity Project, this week announced a new evidence-based process for reviewing the safety of respiratory virus vaccines — something they say is needed since the government stopped doing that kind of systematic review.

Advertisement

Many Democratic-led states also have rebuffed Kennedy’s policies, even creating their own alliances to counter his vaccine guidance.

“We see burgeoning confusion about which sources to trust and about which sources are real. That makes decision-making on an individual level much harder,” said Dr. Megan Ranney, dean of the Yale School of Public Health.

She said she worried the confusion was contributing to the recent rise in diseases like whooping cough and measles, which were once largely eliminated in the U.S.

Surveys indicate growing public wavering over support for the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine. Although a large majority of people support giving it to children, the proportion declined significantly in just over nine months, according to Annenberg research. An August 2025 survey finds that 82% would be “very” or “somewhat” likely to recommend that an eligible child in their household get MMR vaccine, compared with 90% in November 2024.

Advertisement

Surveys show trust is declining again

New findings from the health care research nonprofit KFF in January show that 47% of Americans trust the CDC “a great deal” or “a fair amount” to provide reliable vaccine information, down about 10 percentage points since the beginning of Trump’s second term.

Trust among Democrats dropped 9 percentage points since September, to 55%, the survey found. Trust among Republicans and independents hasn’t changed since September, but it has declined somewhat among both groups since the beginning of Trump’s term.

Even among MAHA supporters, the poll shows, fewer than half say they trust agencies like the CDC and FDA “a lot” or “some” to make recommendations about childhood vaccine schedules.

Gallup surveys also show a drop in Americans who believe the CDC is doing a “good job,” from 40% in 2024 to 31% last year.

Advertisement

Those results came alongside a decline of trust across the government — not just agencies under Kennedy’s oversight. Yet concerns about Kennedy’s trustworthiness also have emerged in the past year. Documents recently obtained by The Associated Press and The Guardian, for example, undermine his statements that a 2019 trip to Samoa ahead of a measles outbreak had “nothing to do with vaccines.” The documents have prompted senators to assert that Kennedy lied to them over the visit.

HHS officials say they are promoting independent decision-making by families while working to reduce preventable diseases. They say reducing routine vaccine recommendations was meant to ensure parents vaccinate children against the riskiest diseases.

HHS did not make Kennedy available for an interview, despite repeated requests. But as he has pledged to restore trust, he’s also urged people to come to their own conclusions.

“This idea that you should trust the experts,” Kennedy said recently on The Katie Miller Podcast, “a good mother doesn’t do that.”

Advertisement

___

AP writer Amelia Thomson DeVeaux in Washington contributed to this report.

___

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NewsBeat

Person seriously injured after two people hit by car

Published

on

Wales Online
Person seriously injured after two people hit by car | Wales Online

reach logo

At Reach and across our entities we and our partners use information collected through cookies and other identifiers from your device to improve experience on our site, analyse how it is used and to show personalised advertising. You can opt out of the sale or sharing of your data, at any time clicking the “Do Not Sell or Share my Data” button at the bottom of the webpage. Please note that your preferences are browser specific. Use of our website and any of our services represents your acceptance of the use of cookies and consent to the practices described in our Privacy Notice and Terms and Conditions.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Sewing Bee winner Annie Phillips answers Telegraph Recommended reader questions

Published

on

Sewing Bee winner Annie Phillips answers Telegraph Recommended reader questions

How did your sewing journey start?

Lorna, South East

My sewing journey started when I was around eight. My grandmother is Ghanaian and it’s a part of her culture to make her own clothes. So she, without question, said: “You’re learning! You’re learning how to sew!” to me and all my cousins. But I was the only one that pursued it. I’m really glad I did as it gave me a different outlook on dressing, clothing, altering and vintage that I continued into my adult life.

What inspired you to innovate with sustainable dressing?

Charnjit, West Midlands

Advertisement

For me, reworking from home is something that’s always been in my family. My dad has upcycled furniture for a long time. I can’t remember anything that we had from new, so it wasn’t a conscious choice. As a student it was out of necessity but also being experimental. Then, working in the fashion industry, I saw how much waste there was and I thought this is something I can practically do as a conscious choice to try and tackle waste.

Should sewing be a core part of the school curriculum?

Lisa, South East

It’s a necessity to hopefully change people’s concept of how disposable clothing is. It’s really surprising seeing people unable to change a button or expand the lifespan of something really, really simply. I think it would be amazing to see sewing go back into the curriculum for children.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

if elections are held this spring, who might be the next president?

Published

on

if elections are held this spring, who might be the next president?

Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, is under intense pressure from the US to take his country to the polls as early as this spring. Donald Trump is demanding elections as a condition for American security guarantees for Ukraine against any future Russian invasion.

Zelensky has faced persistent calls from Russian president, Vladimir Putin, and at times from Trump as well, to hold an election. His term expired in 2024, but the country’s constitution forbids elections during wartime. So to schedule a poll will also mean a constitutional change to enable it.

But if the US president gets his way and elections are held later this year, whoever wins and becomes Ukraine’s next president will be faced with the task of managing a country at war and perhaps steering the nation towards an uncertain peace.

It is hard to predict who might stand for the presidency – under the current circumstances, no one is declaring their candidacy. But it’s reasonable to assume that Zelensky would put himself forward for a second term. If so, he cannot be expecting to coast to victory as he did in 2019 when he won more than 74% of the popular vote.

Advertisement

While Zelensky has been celebrated in the west as a hero for his wartime leadership, his popularity has been damaged by a series of corruption scandals. In November 2025, several government officials and business leaders with close connections to Zelensky – including the justice minister and a former prime minister – were accused of stealing US$100 million (£73 million) from Ukraine’s energy sector by Ukraine’s anti-corruption agencies.

Just a few months earlier, in July, widespread protests erupted against a new law that would place those same anti-corruption agencies under the control of an official appointed by Zelensky. This move was widely seen as an attempt to enable the president to stop any inconvenient investigations in their tracks and shield his associates from prosecution.

Zelensky acted quickly to distance himself from both of these scandals. He reversed the controversial legislation in the summer and has called for the resignation of serving officials named in the energy corruption investigation. But these events have tarnished his reputation at home.

According to surveys conducted by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, trust in Zelensky dropped from 74% in May 2025 to 59% in December. Although incumbents in other countries might look with envy at these figures, only 26% “completely” trust him and would like to see him continue as president. The rest indicated that they would prefer a change at the top of Ukraine’s political leadership. That said, a recent poll had his support at 30.9%, with only one other potential candidate within touching distance.

Advertisement

That potential candidate is Valerii Zaluzhnyi, whose is often described as a potential leader and whose support was measured at 27.7% in the poll mentioned above. Currently Ukraine’s ambassador to the UK, Zaluzhnyi owes his high profile to his former position as head of Ukraine’s armed forces. He served in that role from 2021 until Zelensky replaced him in February 2024.

The official reason Zelensky gave for the dismissal was the need for new ideas in the military, but there was a suspicion that Zaluzhnyi, widely regarded as a war hero for leading the resistance to Russia’s mass invasion, was becoming too popular. Indeed, a poll conducted in July 2025 found that 73% of Ukrainians said they trusted him, making him the country’s most trusted public figure. Zaluzhnyi has refused to be drawn on whether he might stand for the presidency, but there is widespread speculation that he is simply biding his time.

Another possible candidate whose reputation was built by his wartime leadership is Kyrylo Budanov. Recently appointed by Zelensky as his chief of staff, Budanov led Ukraine’s military intelligence since 2020 and is credited with its effective use of drones to strike targets deep into Russian territory as well as Russian-occupied Ukraine. Like Zaluzhnyi, Budanov has not indicated that he would stand for elected office. Unlike Zaluzhnyi, Budanov has not made a breakthrough in the polls.

Veteran political rivals

A few veterans of past presidential campaigns might throw their hats into the ring again, although neither is likely to be a front runner.

Advertisement

Petro Poroshenko was Ukraine’s president before Zelensky, serving from 2014 until 2019. Since 2021 he has been fighting charges of treason and, more recently, has been placed under sanction by Zelensky.

Charges against him focus on alleged pro-Russian political and economic interests, such as his connection with the now-banned Party of the Regions and his slowness to sell off his assets in Russia and Russian-occupied Ukraine. He denies any wrongdoing and has called the sanctions “politically motivated” and “unconstitutional”.

Petro Poroshenko on a 2019 election billboard in Lvov, Ukraine. Poroshenko is widely seen as Russia’s choice if an election is held in 2026.
EPA/Pavlo Palamarchuk

Yulia Tymoshenko was a leading figure in Ukraine’s 2004 Orange Revolution. She is a former prime minister, leader of the “Fatherhood” political party and a populist politician who has a strong following among rural voters, especially older women.

But she has recently been charged with offering bribes to lawmakers in what has been reported as an attempt to undermine the ruling Servant of the People Party. She denies the charges. She is only polling in the single digits.

Advertisement

Problems with a wartime election

It is important to remember that Moscow demands fresh elections in Ukraine as a condition of any peace deal. It is unlikely that Russia expects a pro-Russian candidate to be successful and take the country in a more Russia-friendly direction. But the entire process of holding fair elections in Ukraine anytime soon is fraught with difficulties that would offer opportunities for Russia to exploit.

For example, the organisational challenge of creating accurate electoral registers that include the millions of displaced Ukrainians – many of them living abroad – would invite challenges to the fairness of the election and the legitimacy of the results.

The political divisions that inevitably come to the surface during election campaigns would provide ideal grounds for stirring up dissension and dissatisfaction – a well-established practice undertaken by the Russian security services – and thereby undermining the solidarity of Ukrainian society.

So regardless of who becomes Ukraine’s next president, if the election goes ahead in the coming months as Donald Trump is demanding, the winner in a broader sense may be Russia.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Belfast Culture Night 2026 confirmed, as survey shows last year’s low-key reboot was a success

Published

on

Ipso logo

Belfast councillors at City Hall have agreed £150,000 for the festival

Belfast Culture Night has been confirmed again for 2026, and will be held on Friday September 18, in line with other Culture Night events across the island of Ireland.

Advertisement

The event will continue to build on the more low-key, but still highly successful model introduced last year by Belfast City Council.

This week, at a committee meeting at City Hall, councillors agreed to fund £150,000 for Culture Night 2026, the same as last year, through a procurement process including an option to extend the contract to cover delivery of Culture Night 2027. The decision will go to the full council meeting next month for ratification, where it is expected to pass.

READ MORE: East Belfast to get £1.6million to help disadvantaged areas get involved in climate action

READ MORE: Local opposition grows against Botanic GAA pitch plan that will uproot community gardens

Advertisement

At the February meeting of the council’s City Growth and Regeneration Committee, officers presented findings of last year’s event, provided by the arts and heritage evaluators and researchers Thrive.

Culture Night returned to Belfast in September 2025 following a six-year absence precipitated by the coronavirus crisis, and the host organisation, the Cathedral Quarter Trust, folding operations. The new Culture Night aimed not to programme street-based events, and instead concentrated on venue-based events across a wider space in the city, with more community involvement.

It also aimed to move away from street drinking and concentrations of crowds, and required organisations to prove they were paying artists.

A council report for this month’s committee states: “The 2025 event was delivered as a venue-led, city-wide programme, prioritising free, accessible and family-friendly activity and operating through a receiving house model. As a pilot to support a new approach to Culture Night a number of artists, cultural organisations and venues were financially supported to participate, and no street-based programming or road closures were included.”

Advertisement

The Thrive evaluation concluded that the pilot for a new approach to Culture Night 2025 was a success, generating positive audience experiences, “sector goodwill” and an estimated attendance of 50,000 people. A total of 158 events were delivered by 182 participating organisations, venues and artists.

The committee report states: “Audiences valued the safe, welcoming and family-friendly atmosphere, while participants reported high levels of satisfaction and willingness to take part again. Areas identified for further development included improved signage and navigation between sites, earlier engagement with the cultural sector, including artists, venues and organisations, and continued strengthening of activity across all areas of the city beyond the city centre and Cathedral Quarter.”

Thrive showed the average spend per attendee who spent money was £33.33, while the estimated total economic impact of approximately a minimum £1.67 million for the city. Audiences were younger and more diverse than typical arts audiences in Belfast.

14 percent of attendees lived in the most deprived areas of Northern Ireland, 20 percent of respondents identified as disabled, including people with invisible and neurodivergent conditions, and 14 percent of respondents identified as LGBTQ+.

Advertisement

73 percent of participants delivering events were taking part in Culture Night for the first time. 75 percent of events were suitable for all ages, reinforcing the family-friendly focus. Music was the most represented artform, accounting for 51 percent of events.

Events took place across all parts of the city, including North, South, East and West Belfast. 43 percent of events were located in Cathedral Quarter and 28 percent in the city centre. Venues outside the city centre experienced lower footfall, which the report concludes “reflected the event’s first year back in a new format, and need to build on a city-wide offer.”

86 percent of audiences rated their overall experience as good or very good. 95 percent of attendees spent two or more hours at Culture Night, with 33 percent spending five or more hours. 44 percent of audiences reported visiting venues or places they had not previously visited.

£49,482 was distributed to support artists and venues. 48 percent of events submitted for the programme requested financial support to participate. 93 percent of participants stated they would like to take part again in future Culture Nights.

Advertisement

No incidents were recorded by the council or PSNI that were directly linked to Culture Night 2025.

Established in 2009, Culture Night Belfast was a large-scale and free cultural event taking place in the Cathedral Quarter, based on the Temple Bar Cultural Trust Dublin event.

Audiences grew to an attendance of over 100,000 for the 2019 event held across two days in September 2019. The budget for Culture Night ranged from £240k in 2016 to over £328k in 2019, with around £12K coming from the council in its last four years.

COVID resulted in the suspension of the event in September 2020, with a digital version staged instead. That year the Cathedral Quarter Trust and Belfast City Council co-commissioned a review which said “the existing model for Culture Night has become problematic.”

Advertisement

The review stated the audience for the event has grown exponentially whilst the volume and quality in the programme had not, and stated the idea that artists “could, would or should give their time for free is no longer a viable delivery model.” It said the audience’s relationship with the event has changed so much that family audiences “felt pushed out and unsafe.”

In 2022 organisers said that the event had “become too big and unwieldy” and the original intention of providing a platform for artistic and cultural communities to connect with a much wider audience “had been lost.”

Culture Night ran in Belfast in 2021, but did not return. In 2023 the Cathedral Quarter Trust announced it would cease day-to-day operations after Stormont funding was ended. Financial pressures facing Stormont’s Department for Communities were reportedly behind the decision.

In the Republic of Ireland Culture Night is largely led by local authorities in each area, with investments ranging from approximately €30k in Cork to over €190k in Dublin. Unlike the Culture Night Belfast model, which was largely about converting the streets of the Cathedral Quarter into a pop-up venue with road closures and “on-street” programming, Culture Night Dublin does not involve road closures and is spread across the whole city.

Advertisement

Want to see more of the stories you love from Belfast Live? Making us your preferred source on Google means you’ll get more of our exclusives, top stories and must-read content straight away. To add Belfast Live as a preferred source, simply click here

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Si King’s pie restaurant Propa hiring – here’s how to apply

Published

on

Si King's pie restaurant Propa hiring - here's how to apply

The restaurant, Propa, based at Sheepfolds in Sunderland, is looking for someone to work on the pies and comfort food “we’re known and loved for”.

Posting the advert to Facebook, Propa said: “This is a 36–45 hours per week role with hourly pay, working on the pies and comfort food classics we’re known and loved for.

“You’ll be cooking as part of a close, collaborative team where ideas are welcomed and creativity is encouraged alongside our current chefs.

Advertisement

“At Propa, the kitchen is a big part of our personality and so is our social media. This role includes being comfortable getting involved in content, behind the scenes clips and sharing what we do with our customers online.

“If you love great food, teamwork, creativity and aren’t camera shy, we’d love to hear from you.”

To apply for the role, you can email info@teampropa.com.

The restaurant has gone from strength to strength since opening in December 2024.

Advertisement

In a review of Propa in February 2025, The Northern Echo described the pie and mash as a “warm hug”.

Potential expansion plans for the restaurant were also announced last December.

The celebrity chef spoke about the future of his restaurant brand during an appearance on the ‘Full Chat podcast’, with presenters Iwan Thomas and David Prutton.

He said: “We will open one in Newcastle, it’s inevitable, because we want to. It’s about bringing that thing to the North East.”

Advertisement

To apply email info@teampropa.com or visit the shop’s Facebook page.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

New shuttle-bus service launched to worshippers get to mosque during Ramadan

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

It will improve accessibility and help ease traffic

Worshippers visiting mosques on Mill Road are set to benefit from improved travel options this Ramadan following an expanded partnership between the Mill Road Traders Association (MRTA), Stagecoach, and Cambridge Central Mosque. Running throughout the holy month of Ramadan (February 17 to March 19), the partnership introduces a dedicated evening shuttle-bus service operating from Newmarket Road Park & Ride.

Advertisement

The new service has been designed to support worshippers travelling to Cambridge Central Mosque and other mosques along Mill Road. Ramadan traditionally brings increased evening travel as worshippers attend nightly prayers, community gatherings, and religious observances.

Recognising these unique travel patterns, the partners have worked collaboratively to deliver a practical transport solution that benefits both worshippers and the wider Cambridge community. The pilot initiative has been developed with two key objectives: improving accessibility for worshippers and helping ease traffic pressures and congestion along the Mill Road corridor during peak evening periods.

The shuttle-bus service will operate alongside existing Stagecoach routes, including Service 2 from Milton, ensuring residents and visitors have multiple sustainable travel options.

Kobir Ahmed, Chair of the MRTA, added: “I am very proud to be part of this initiative, which shows what is possible when local businesses, community organisations and transport providers work together with a shared purpose. By supporting worshippers during Ramadan, easing congestion on Mill Road and improving access through sustainable transport, this pilot reflects the kind of collaborative, practical solutions that the MRTA is committed to championing.

Advertisement

“We hope it sets a positive example of how partnership working can deliver real benefits for the whole community. Importantly, this marks the MRTA’s first major initiative of 2026. We look forward to delivering many more collaborative projects throughout the year, working closely with stakeholders, partners, and the wider community to support Mill Road’s continued vibrancy and accessibility.”

Martin Marsh, Acting Operations Director of Stagecoach East, said: “We are very pleased to be able to support the Mill Road community with such a poignant event, and I hope that this will be a boost for all our loyal customers, in the area, at this special time.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Max Verstappen calls new F1 regulations ‘not F1’ and ‘anti-racing’

Published

on

Max Verstappen calls new F1 regulations ‘not F1’ and ‘anti-racing’

Asked whether these new rules might hasten his departure from the sport, or whether winning races in this formula might get him to change his mind, the 28-year-old gave a response which will concern the sport’s rulers.

“Winning, for me… that doesn’t matter. It needs to be fun to drive as well, I think, at this stage of my career.

“I mean, I am of course also exploring other things outside of Formula One to have fun at. Yeah I mean, I know that we’re stuck with this regulation for quite a while. So, yeah. Let’s see.”

Advertisement

Organisers of the Nürburgring 24hrs (May 16–17) have already tweaked their calendar to allow Verstappen to take part in one of the early season Nürburgring Endurance Series (NLS) rounds, bringing NLS2 forward by a week to avoid a clash with the Japanese Grand Prix.

Verstappen said he appreciated the effort and hoped to drive in both that round and the main event in May, most likely at the wheel of a Winward Racing Mercedes-AMG.

“I mean, looking at it now, at least maybe you can drive flat out there, you know? Without looking after my battery.

“I mean, I want to do it. We are working on it to make it happen, but I cannot confirm it yet. But it’s great, of course, from the organisers, that they change the date [of NLS2] because I think if I do it, of course, I need one race in preparation compared to guys that have been doing it for a while and have a bit more experience.”

Advertisement

On Wednesday, seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton described the new regulations as “ridiculously complex”, adding you would “need a degree to fully understand it all”.

Going back to F1’s new rules, Verstappen concluded: “Probably people will not be happy with me saying this right now, but I am outspoken and why am I not allowed to say what I think of my race car? I can’t help that. I mean, I didn’t write the regulations.”


Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

The hardest and best places to pass a driving test in North East

Published

on

The hardest and best places to pass a driving test in North East

It comes as the DVSA announced that from March 31, learners will only be able to make up to two changes to their original driving test booking, including changing date, time or location.

Data, which Confused.com has published, shows that the area with the most driving test failures is Gateshead, which has the lowest success rate at 38.6 per cent.

On the other hand, Hexham has the highest pass rate at 58.9 per cent.

Advertisement

Matt Crole-Rees, motoring expert at Confused.com, said: “New rules are coming in from March 31 that limit how often learner drivers can change their test and where they can move it to.

“This is another big shift for learners trying to get on the roads.

“Allowing only two changes and learners only being able to move their original test booking within the local area could make things even harder for learners who live in areas with historically low pass rates.

“For learners in lower-performing areas, having less flexibility to move their test after waiting so long could mean more retakes, more waiting and higher overall costs.

Advertisement

“With these changes in mind, it’s more important than ever for learners to think before they book their test.

“Plan carefully, only take the test when really prepared and understand how local test centres perform before booking in.”

Full list of North East pass rates:

  • Gateshead – 38.6 per cent
  • Sunderland – 46.7 per cent
  • Durham – 47.8 per cent
  • Blyth – 48.5 per cent
  • Middlesbrough – 50 per cent
  • Hartlepool – 50.1 per cent
  • Darlington – 51.5 per cent
  • Hexham – 58.9 per cent

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

New designer outlet next to major A-road set to open in 2028

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

The outlet will be an easy drive from Cambridgeshire once complete

A new designer outlet that is easy to reach from Cambridgeshire is set to open in late 2028. The Grantham Designer Outlet Village is expected to attract over 3.9 million visitors a year and become “one of the top 10 best-performing outlets in the UK, by turnover”.

Advertisement

The site will be built across 36 acres and will feature space for both retail and leisure brands. Over 50% of the space has been pre-let or is in active negotiation.

The £140 million project will be led by outlet specialists Rioja Estates and Buckminster Estates and will be found on a new purpose-built junction off the A1. The outlet will be passed by more than 17 million vehicles a day and is described as being in “one of the best outlet locations in the UK”.

The shopping outlet will have connections to both Grantham Town Centre and railway station. Its location on the A1 means it will be easy to reach from Nottingham, Leicester, Lincoln, Peterborough, Derby, and Cambridge. The outlet village is expected to create 1,500 jobs during construction and operation.

Adrian Taylor, Leasing Director at Rioja Estates, said: “Retailers understand that outlets are outperforming traditional retail, so Grantham Designer Outlet Village’s visibility, location, and catchment area make it an exceptionally attractive proposition which explains why we are seeing such strong demand from both UK and international brands.”

Advertisement

To get more breaking news and top stories delivered directly to your phone, join our new WhatsApp community. Click this link to receive your daily dose of CambridgeshireLive content.

We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Farm building near Cambs city could be converted into maisonettes

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

The plans are currently awaiting decision

Plans that will see an agricultural building on the outskirts of Peterborough converted into three residential properties have been submitted to Peterborough City Council.

Advertisement

The current site at Vincents Cross Farm, off Crowland Road, Thorney, consists of a disused farm building set within 1,875 square metres of largely redundant land.

In its application statement, Horrell Farm Company requested permission for the “conversion of an agricultural building to three dwellings including partial demolition, associated access and landscaping.”

If the plans are approved, the building will be converted into one three-bedroom ground-floor flat, and two four-bedroom maisonettes.

A planning statement drawn up on behalf of Horrell Farm Company by Stamford-based architects, Class Q, describes the site’s current agricultural use as “ceasing” and the building as “redundant.”

Advertisement

It goes on to describe the building as “constructed with solid brick” and the “external walls and roof structure remain intact.”

In addition, it is in “good condition overall and there is no substantive evidence to indicate the building could not be readily converted for residential use or that reconstruction works would be significant.”

The area surrounding the building is laid to hardstanding.

The planning statement concludes: “It follows that the building has the character of a substantial construction that is a permanent feature in this part of the countryside.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025