GENEVA (AP) — Iran and the United States prepared to meet Thursday in Geneva for nuclear negotiations viewed as a last chance for diplomacy as America has gathered a fleet of aircraft and warships to the Middle East to pressure Tehran into a deal.
U.S. President Donald Trump wants a deal to constrain Iran’s nuclear program, and he sees an opportunity while the country is struggling at home with growing dissent following nationwide protests last month. Iran meanwhile has maintained it wants to continue to enrich uranium even as its program sits in ruins, following Trump ordering an attack in June on three of the Islamic Republic’s nuclear sites, part of a bruising 12-day war last year.
If an American attack happens, Iran has said all U.S. military bases in the Mideast would be considered legitimate targets, putting at risk tens of thousands of American service members. Iran has also threatened to attack Israel, meaning a regional war again could erupt across the Middle East.
“There would be no victory for anybody — it would be a devastating war,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told India Today in an interview filmed Wednesday just before he flew to Geneva.
Advertisement
“Since the Americans’ bases are scattered through different places in the region, then unfortunately perhaps the whole region would be engaged and be involved, so it is a very terrible scenario.”
Geneva talks will be the third meeting since June war
Araghchi again will sit across from Steve Witkoff, a billionaire real estate developer and friend of Trump who serves as a special Mideast envoy for the president. The two men held multiple rounds of talks last year that collapsed after Israel launched its war against Iran in June. These latest talks are again being mediated by Oman, a sultanate on the eastern edge of the Arabian Peninsula that’s long served as an interlocutor between Iran and the West.
Araghchi met Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi after arriving in Geneva on Wednesday night. The men “reviewed the views and proposals that the Iranian side will present to reach an agreement on the Iranian nuclear program, based on the guiding principles agreed upon in the previous round of negotiations,” a report from the state-run Oman News Agency said. Al-Busaidi will pass on Iran’s offer to American officials on Thursday, it added.
An Associated Press journalist saw al-Busaidi after he met with the director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog. The Omani diplomat flashed a thumbs up to a question about whether he was hopeful for the talks.
Advertisement
Al-Busaidi returned Thursday to the Omani diplomatic residence on the shores of Lake Geneva . A convoy believed to be carrying American diplomats later arrived to the compound, followed by another believed to be carrying Iranian diplomats.
In this round of negotiations after the June war, Trump has pushed to halt Iran’s enrichment of uranium entirely, as well as address Tehran’s ballistic missile program and its support of regional militant forces. Iran has maintained the talks must remain focused only on nuclear issues.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters Wednesday that Iran is “always trying to rebuild elements” of its nuclear program. He said that Tehran is not enriching uranium right now, “but they’re trying to get to the point where they ultimately can.”
The West and the IAEA say Iran had a nuclear weapons program until 2003. Before the June attack, it had been enriching uranium up to 60% purity — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
U.S. intelligence agencies assess that Iran has yet to restart a weapons program, but has “undertaken activities that better position it to produce a nuclear device, if it chooses to do so.” While insisting its program is peaceful, Iranian officials have threatened to pursue the bomb in recent years.
“The principle’s very simple: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon,” U.S. Vice President JD Vance told reporters at the White House on Wednesday.
Vance said Trump is “sending those negotiators to try to address that problem” and “wants to address that problem diplomatically.”
Advertisement
“But, of course, the president has other options as well,” Vance added.
Threat of military action sparks war fears
If the talks fail, uncertainty hangs over the timing of any possible attack.
If the aim of potential military action is to pressure Iran to make concessions in nuclear negotiations, it’s not clear whether limited strikes would work. If the goal is to remove Iran’s leaders, that will likely commit the U.S. to a larger, longer military campaign. There has been no public sign of planning for what would come next, including the potential for chaos in Iran.
There is also uncertainty about what any military action could mean for the wider region. Tehran could retaliate against the American-allied nations of the Persian Gulf or Israel. Oil prices have risen in recent days in part due to those concerns, with benchmark Brent crude now about $70 a barrel. Iran in the last round of talks said it briefly halted traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf through which a fifth of all oil traded passes.
Advertisement
Satellite photos shot Tuesday and Wednesday by Planet Labs PBC and analyzed by the AP appeared to show that American vessels typically docked in Bahrain, the home of the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet, were all out at sea. The 5th Fleet referred questions to the U.S. military’s Central Command, which declined to comment. Before Iran’s attack on Qatar in June, the 5th Fleet similarly scattered its ships at sea to protect against a potential attack.
___
Gambrell reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and Melanie Lidman from Jerusalem. Associated Press writer Will Weissert in Washington contributed to this report.
Small kitchen appliance brand Sage has topped several of our recent kitchen tests. And no, it hasn’t paid to be there. Categories are often tested by different experts, yet the brand has still been named as the purveyor of our best toastie maker, best sparkling water maker and, of course, our highest rated coffee machine.
Many of the brand’s appliances are well-finished in stainless steel, bringing a quality to your kitchen that can’t be found at lower prices. Still, when food writer and kettle and toaster tester, Imogen Hope named Sage’s £119 Soft Top Luxe Kettle her best kettle, we decided it was worth further investigation.
Here, Imogen sets out exactly why she thinks it’s worth spending this on a kettle, while I, Recommended’s home and garden editor, explain why I would reach for her value buy, instead.
Advertisement
What you need to know about Sage’s The Soft Top Luxe Kettle
Before we dive into the pros and cons, here’s what £120 of kettle will buy you.
Hope tested the stainless steel iteration (colours from pink to burgundy are also available) and was impressed with the build quality, free of any flimsy plastic. Surprisingly, though, it’s a simple kettle. You will find no variable temperature settings, touchscreen or keep-warm function here. But you won’t need to read a manual to decipher its two buttons either (one for the lid and one to boil), and thoughtful details like a transparent side panel and lid make it easy to see how much water is inside and if it is close to boiling.
The ergonomic handle is comfortable, and there are clear markers from between two and seven cups to show how much water it contains. Its most notable feature is a soft-close lid (hence the name), which slowly and smoothly opens to give plenty of access for filling, and prevents any risk of hot water splashing should you need to open the lid right after boiling.
“But this circle will close with me teaching him a lesson.
“He’s not fighting some weight-drained super middleweight. I am in shape and will bring home this victory.”
Fury is signed to Frank Warren’s Queensberry, but TKO president Mark Shapiro said on Wednesday that Zuffa Boxing will promote the fight, which will be shown on Netflix.
Prograis, 37, is a former world champion at light-welterweight, but has two losses in his past three outings, including to Jack Catterall and Devin Haney.
The fact that Keir Starmer’s government have promised to put women and girls “at the heart of everything we do” in our international work is right and proper, recognising the growing threats of violence and of essential rights undermined everywhere.
However with dramatic cuts to our international development budget already underway there will be competition for what shrunken resources remain. We need to ensure that one of the key building blocks to fulfilling that ambition to empower women and girls – access to clean water and sanitation does not suffer.
WASH services – Water, Sanitation and Hygiene – are incredibly important if we are to reduce the almost 400,000 deaths of young children every year from diseases including cholera and diarrhoea. One in four people globally still lack safe drinking water.
But that is only part of the story. The United Nations has drawn a direct line between a lack of safe water and sanitation and much wider problems including food and supply chain shortages that can spark conflicts.
Advertisement
The All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on WASH I chair, backed by the wisdom of charity Water Aid, has previously highlighted in a landmark report how previous cuts to UK aid spending on WASH “put our national health security at risk” – because they raised the risks of infectious diseases and antibiotic-resistant “superbugs” spreading across the world.
It’s something that the great British public “gets” too. Significantly, 54 per cent of the British public put clean water and toilets in their top priorities for spending development aid. MPs and government should take heed.
A failure to provide clean water and sanitation makes it impossible to achieve the aim of giving women and girls more control over their lives – because it is they who disproportionately carry the burden of collecting water. That means dragging them away from school and from work and putting them in greater danger from gender-based violence.
In addition, as Evelyn Mere, the country director in Nigeria WaterAid, put it so powerfully when describing the impact of WASH cuts to MPs recently: “The number one thing is that girls are unable to stay in school because they have no decent toilets and no place to manage their menstruation in dignity and privacy. Once menstruation starts, they stay away from school. That negatively impacts their educational performance in school and begins the journey of disadvantaging them in life.”
Advertisement
For all these reasons, it is alarming that WASH services are likely to be targeted in the aid cuts that will strip £6.5 billion from our aid budget by 2028 – some 40 per cent of the money available.
Ministers have admitted the UK will be “moving away from the direct delivery of WASH services”, arguing developing countries can step in with our help to “strengthen” their capabilities. Closer partnerships are welcome, of course – but not if that is a cover for cuts. Alarm bells are ringing.
This government must not repeat the mistakes of previous Conservative administration who slashed WASH spending by 78 per cent at the turn of this decade – making a mockery our commitment to the UN goal of universal WASH access for all by 2030.
Consider also how, just 15 months ago, the UK and Nigeria signed a pioneering strategic partnership, naming economic growth, jobs and reducing aid dependency among its aims. All of this is undermined by failing to fund WASH services, because people must take sick days and spend money to treat diseases caused by unsafe water and lack of sanitation. That is a drag anchor on the Nigerian economy.
Advertisement
WaterAid has highlighted evidence that Nigeria could benefit from a $26 billion (£19bn) “sanitation economy” by 2030, where small businesses sell toilets, people find jobs building them, and young women train as plumbers – just as India provided 100 million toilets in less than a decade – if the UK invests in WASH services. It would help to deliver the very economic boost the partnership seeks.
I was proud when Labour’s former interim leader Harriet Harman was appointed as the UK’s special envoy for women and girls, to in her words “play a key role in standing up for the rights of all women and girls at a critical time”.
However, that noble promise cannot be met if the UK shrinks back from playing its part in ensuring the most basic rights of all, to water, sanitation and hygiene.
Rupa Huq is the chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Water, Sanitation and Hygiene and Labour MP for Ealing Central and Acton
Advertisement
This article has been produced as part of The Independent’s Rethinking Global Aid project
Indonesia has freed and deported an American man after he spent 11 years in jail for the premeditated murder of his then-girlfriend’s mother, in a case known as the Bali “suitcase murder”.
Tommy Schaefer was sentenced to 18 years in prison for the 2014 murder of Sheila von Wiese-Mack, the mother of Heather Mack, during a holiday on the island.
The battered body of the Chicago socialite was found in a suitcase in the boot of a taxi at a luxury resort.
The couple were trying to gain access to a $1.5m (£1.1m) trust fund, prosecutors have said.
Advertisement
Image: Tommy Schaefer pictured in 2015. Pic: Reuters
Mack, who was a few weeks pregnant at the time of the attack, told the court in 2015 her mother objected to her relationship with Schaefer.
She covered her 62-year-old mother’s mouth while Schaefer used a fruit bowl for the assault.
Police in Bali arrested Mack, nearly 19 at the time, and the then-21-year-old Schaefer a day later.
Advertisement
Schaefer was deported back to the US from Bali International Airport on Tuesday after serving his sentence and receiving a number of remissions for good behaviour, said Felucia Sengky Ratna, head of the Bali Regional Office of the directorate general of immigration.
Image: Tommy Schaefer. Pic: Reuters
He was in custody and arrived in Illinois on Wednesday, a spokesperson for the US Marshals Service, which transports federal prisoners, confirmed.
Schaefer was scheduled to make an initial court appearance in Chicago on Thursday morning on federal charges of conspiracy to kill someone in a foreign country, conspiracy to commit murder and tampering with a victim.
Image: Pic: Anta Kesuma/EPA/Shutterstock
Mack served seven years of a 10-year prison sentence in Bali for helping with the murder and was deported in October 2021.
Advertisement
She was also sentenced to 26 years in prison in Chicago in January 2024, after she pleaded guilty to helping kill her mother and stuffing the body in a suitcase.
A radical new structure for English rugby is expected to be rubber-stamped at a Rugby Football Union council meeting on Friday.
The Prem would separate from the rest of the pyramid, with traditional promotion and relegation immediately scrapped.
Instead the Prem will look to expand from 10 teams to 12 teams by 2030, with further expansion possible if ambitious clubs meet criteria on and off the field.
This could mean clubs like Wasps, Worcester and London Irish – who all went bust in the 2022-23 season – return to the top flight in the future.
Advertisement
As it stands, there is a mechanism for promotion and relegation to and from the Prem via a play-off with the top-placed side in the Champ.
However Ealing Trailfinders, consistently the best team in the second tier, have failed to meet the existing standards – especially around stadium size.
There has been no relegation from the Prem since Saracens went down in 2020 after a heavy points deduction for salary cap breaches. Sarries were also the last team to gain promotion after winning the Championship in 2021.
Under the new plans, ambitious clubs would still be able to apply for a place in the Prem, but would need to meet a variety of revamped criteria – potentially financial and commercial as well as on-pitch performance and potential.
Advertisement
English rugby insiders expect the new structure to collectively raise standards across the clubs and make the game more attractive to investors.
“We are lifting the bar on what we want clubs to do across various areas,” said one leading executive.
According to sources, any club would be able to apply for a place in an expanded Prem.
They could be ambitious Champ sides such as Coventry, dormant former powerhouses like Wasps – who plan to relaunch in Kent in the coming seasons – or brand-new entities.
Advertisement
The Champ clubs had previously rejected plans for a franchise-type model, but leading figures in the club game insist their board has been consulted throughout the process and have endorsed the recommendation.
“It could be transformational for aspirational Champ clubs,” a senior source told the BBC.
“We are looking at a range of different options to make the Premiership thriving, exciting and a really interesting place to invest in,” RFU chief executive Bill Sweeney told BBC Sport last year.
“Part of that will be a model whereby you qualify for an expansion league in the Premiership, but based on criteria around financial sustainability, fanbase and stadium, not just performance on the field of play.”
Soham murderer Ian Huntley is reported to be fighting for his life after an attack at high-security HMP Frankland. According to reports from The Sun, he was left lying in a puddle of blood on his prison wing and was taken to hospital this morning (February 26).
The former caretaker, 52, is serving a life sentence at the County Durham prison for murdering Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells in Soham in 2002. A spokesperson from the Ministry of Justice said: “A prisoner is receiving treatment after an incident at HMP Frankland on Thursday morning. It would be inappropriate to comment further while police investigate.”
A North East Ambulance Service spokesperson added: “We received a call at 9.23am on Thursday 26 February 2026 to reports of an incident at HM Prison Frankland in County Durham. We dispatched two ambulance crews to the scene and requested support from the Great North Air Ambulance Service (GNAAS). One patient was transported to hospital by road.”
Advertisement
Jessica and Holly, both aged 10, went missing when they left a family barbecue to go and buy sweets. They never returned home and their bodies were found a week later.
Huntley had lured the girls to his home, murdered them and disposed of their bodies in a ditch. After efforts from police and the local community, their bodies were found near an airbase, 12 miles from Soham.
He returned to the site where he dumped the bodies and cut off their closed and burned them, his trial heard. The remains of Manchester United shirts that the girls were wearing were found later in a bin by police.
Suspicions were raised when he gave a chillingly detailed interview to the press about the girls, who attended St Andrew’s Primary School. It appeared that he took an unusual interest in the case.
Advertisement
Huntley denied the murders but was ultimately convicted in 2003 following a trial. Huntley has previously been attacked in the same prison, when a prisoner slit his throat in 2010.
A spokesman for Durham Constabulary said: “Police were alerted to an assault which had taken place within HMP Frankland in Durham this morning.
“A male prisoner suffered serious injuries during the incident and was transported to hospital. A police investigation is now underway into the circumstances of the incident and detectives are liaising with staff at the prison.”
Bridgerton season 4, part 2 finally landed after an arduous wait – but what does the future hold for the Netflix period drama?
11:19, 26 Feb 2026Updated 13:40, 26 Feb 2026
5 things you didn’t know about Bridgerton’s Hannah Dodd
Bridgerton is back on screens after Netflix dropped the second half of season four, following a painful month of pining and leaving audiences on a cliffhanger.
Fans got another four episodes to binge as the story picked up from Benedict Bridgerton’s (played by Luke Thompson) proposal to Sophie Baek (Yerin Ha) to become his mistress.
Advertisement
Those who have raced through the episodes now want to know if there will be more from the Netflix Regency series.
Here’s the lowdown about whether there will be another season of Bridgerton and the future of the period drama franchise.
Will there be a season 5 of Bridgerton?
Yes, Bridgerton season five has already been greenlit by Netflix. The streaming platform renewed the show for both seasons five and six at the same time in May 2025.
In a statement in Lady Whistledown’s Society Papers, it was announced: “Dearest Gentle Reader, Rarely is this author granted the opportunity to share with you such information.
Advertisement
“It is with great pleasure I can announce Bridgerton shall return for Seasons 5 and 6. Do celebrate accordingly.
Watch Bridgerton on Netflix for free with Sky
Advertisement
This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more
Sky is giving away a free Netflix subscription with its new Sky Stream TV bundles, including the £15 Essential TV plan.
This lets members watch live and on-demand TV content without a satellite dish or aerial and includes hit shows like Bridgerton.
“And in the meantime, do prepare yourselves, for Bridgerton Season 4 shall debut in 2026.”
Advertisement
The announcement concluded: “It would seem this author is going to be quite busy. Yours Truly, Lady Whistledown.”
It’s too early to suggest any release date, but given seasons have come out every couple of years season five could be hitting screens in 2028.
The season is again expected to consist of eight episodes and the fifth run is expected to be split in half with a cliffhanger to keep audiences on cliffhanger as they face another month-long wait.
What will happen in Bridgerton season 5?
Bridgerton is adapted from American author Julia Quinn’s best-selling novel series, with each book focusing on a different sibling from the family as they find love.
Advertisement
The fifth book in the series is To Sir Phillip, With Love (2003), which focuses on Eloise Bridgerton (played by Claudia Jessie) and her romance with Sir Phillip Crane (Chris Fulton) after she previously swore off the marriage mart.
However, the TV adaptation has already broken with the order of the books after the show adapted the fourth novel Romancing Mr Bridgerton ahead of the third instalment An Offer from a Gentleman.
This means, To Sir Phillip, With Love might not be adapted for season five and the show may decide to cover the events of the sixth book When He Was Wicked (2004) next.
The sixth novel focuses on the love story between Francesca Bridgerton (Hannah Dodd) and Michael Stirling, the cousin of John Stirling (Victor Alli).
Advertisement
As Bridgerton has gender-swapped Michael for Michaela Stirling (Masali Baduza), this will change how the writers approach the story and could see the show having its first central same-sex romance.
Given the historical context, this would also be interesting to explore and could create much conflict and drama like Sophie and Benedict’s romance across the class divide.
Bridgerton’s showrunner Jess Brownell previously teased seasons five and six at the series four premiere when she showed pocket squares bearing the initials E and F.
Advertisement
She told Deadline: “I would say both characters with the initials on my pocket squares will get seasons in five and six.”
However, she wouldn’t be drawn on who would be the focus of each of them and teased: “In what order? I can’t say.”
But this isn’t it for the Bridgerton franchise after producer and director Tom Verica said the show was looking into various other spin-off involving characters fans were already familiar with.
Bridgerton season 4, part 2 is streaming on Netflix now
Advertisement
**For the latest showbiz, TV, movie and streaming news, go to the new **Everything Gossip** website**
Ensure our latest headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.
It has been confirmed that the actress will reprise her role for the long-awaited third and final series of Doctor Foster, the BBC’s hit psychological drama, alongside Bertie Carvel as Simon and Tom Taylor as Tom.
Created by Mike Bartlett, the series first aired in 2015 and drew acclaim for its tense storytelling, culminating in a second series finale watched by nearly 10 million viewers in 2017.
Suranne Jones on third and final Doctor Foster series on BBC
Ms Jones said: “When I got the call to ask if I wanted to return as Gemma Foster, I knew the time was right.
“We needed space from the first two series and we needed Tom – Gemma and Simon’s runaway son – to return as an adult with questions.
Advertisement
“For me, this time around, it’s about accountability and questioning – can we ever truly sever ties with our past and the damage or traumas that haunt us, so we can fully move forward?
“Gemma and Simon have so much to unpick.
“It’s been an exciting time working with the brilliant Mike Bartlett again, and the team at Drama Republic on the scripts and now I can’t wait to start filming.”
The third series will see Gemma, still a GP and living in the same house, preparing to get married as she embarks on a new chapter in her life.
Advertisement
As the wedding day draws closer, shadows from her past begin to re-emerge, threatening both her happiness and her reputation.
Filming is set to begin later this spring in and around Hertfordshire, with Mike Bartlett returning as writer, creator and executive producer.
Mr Bartlett said: “I always hoped that we’d get to tell the final part of Gemma’s story, which is about a woman seeking justice in an unfair world.
“That feels as relevant now as when Gemma first found a blonde hair on the scarf.”
How did series 2 of Doctor Foster end?
Series 2 of Doctor Foster picks up two years after Gemma exposed her husband Simon’s affair and their marriage collapsed, with her trying to rebuild her life and focus on her son Tom.
Advertisement
However, her world is shaken when Simon (played by Bertie Carvel) returns to Parminster with his new wife, Kate and their child.
As the series progresses, the conflict between Gemma and Simon becomes increasingly toxic, with both trying to hurt and undermine each other and often using their son Tom in the process.
Suranne Jones and Bertie Carvel will return as Gemma and Simon Foster in the new series (Image: BBC/Drama Republic)
The small town becomes divided, with rumours spreading and relationships breaking down and Tom struggles, feeling trapped between his parents’ bitterness and manipulation.
In the finale, Simon tries to convince Tom to leave with him and start a new life abroad, but Tom begins to see the damage both parents have caused.
Advertisement
Tom eventually runs away from home, with the series ending with Gemma agonising over pictures of Tom on ‘Missing Person’ notices.
Will you be watching the new series of Doctor Foster when it returns to the BBC? Let us know in the comments.
Bridgerton fans want to know if Francesca will have a child in the Netflix period drama.
Bridgerton: Five questions following season four
Season four, part two of Bridgerton has finally arrived on Netflix after much anticipation.
The four new episodes focused on Benedict Bridgerton (played by Luke Thompson) and maid Sophie Baek’s (Yerin Ha) steamy romance.
However, there was also another storyline involving Francesca amid the romance and drama that left fans upset.
Along with Hyacinth (Florence Hunt) and Gregory Bridgerton’s storylines, many fans are also curious about what will happen to Francesca Bridgerton (Hannah Dodd). Here’s everything you need to know.
Advertisement
WARNING: This article contains major spoilers from Bridgerton season 4 and the Bridgerton novels by Julia Quinn
Does Francesca Bridgerton have children?
Yes, Francesca does have children in the Bridgerton novels. However, in the original sixth novel When He Was Wicked (2004) by Julia Quinn, Francesca and Michael Stirling don’t conceive a child.
Francesca and Michael are only confirmed to have two children in When He Was Wicked: The 2nd Epilogue, which is part of Quinn’s The Bridgertons: Happily Ever After (2013) book.
Quinn previously wrote in The Bridgertons: Happily Ever After book – which is a series of vignettes revisiting each of Bridgerton’s main couples – that fans were desperate to know if Francesca finally had a baby after When He Was Wicked was first published.
Advertisement
Quinn wrote: “When I sat down to write the 2nd epilogue, I knew that this was the question I must answer…”
Watch Bridgerton on Netflix for free with Sky
Advertisement
This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more
Sky is giving away a free Netflix subscription with its new Sky Stream TV bundles, including the £15 Essential TV plan.
This lets members watch live and on-demand TV content without a satellite dish or aerial and includes hit shows like Bridgerton.
In the second epilogue, it’s confirmed that Francesca has two children, first a son called John Stirling (named after her late husband) and then a daughter a year later called Janet Helen Stirling.
Advertisement
However, the TV adaptation could be a completely different matter after Francesca’s love interest Michael Stirling was gender-swapped to become Michaela Stirling.
In season four, part two, Francesca believes that she has finally fallen pregnant with John Kilmartin’s (Victor Alli) child before his untimely death. But an examination confirms that she isn’t with child as she’d previously hoped.
Francesca is left bereft after finding out she isn’t pregnant and has nothing to remember he late husband by.
When her mother Violet Bridgerton (Ruth Gemmell) attempts to console her daughter, Francesca rebukes her.
Advertisement
Francesca says how Violet was able to fulfil her wifely duty and have eight children at the time of Edmund Bridgerton’s (Rupert Evans) passing.
Given Michael has been changed to Michaela, it’s not clear whether Francesca will be able to have children in the TV series after all. Fans will have to wait and see in either seasons five or six how the writers tackle Francesca’s story and address her infertility.
This isn’t the first time the Netflix series has diverged from the novels, the show also changed the Bridgerton book order and also introduced an alternative historical timeline whereby people of colour inherited lands and titles as depicted in Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Story.
Advertisement
Season four, part one of Bridgerton showed John and Francesca’s fertility troubles as she desperately wanted to conceive a child and fulfil her duty as a wife as she searched for the elusive pinnacle.
Moreover, Francesca always loved children and desperately wanted some of her own after coming from a large family.
Addressing the infertility storyline, actress Dodd previously told Swoondotcom: “So I have said the world pinnacle about a thousand times.”
She went on to explain: “It really breaks my heart that she thinks she’s responsible for not being pregnant yet because of [not finding the pinnacle].
Advertisement
“Obviously, putting that much pressure on that is not going to help it happen as well.”
Dodd added: “She’s just trying to make sure she’s doing the right thing. I think she puts a lot of pressure on herself.”
Bridgerton season 4, part 2 is streaming on Netflix now
**For the latest showbiz, TV, movie and streaming news, go to the new **Everything Gossip** website**
Advertisement
Ensure our latest headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.
Japan joins a long list of countries cracking down on power banks (Picture: Getty Images)
Authorities in Japan have announced a ban on the use of power banks on flights travelling to or from Japan.
Japan’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) said the rule will apply to all aircraft departing from or arriving to the East Asian country, including those operated by both domestic and internal carriers.
Following the ban, set to come into force in April 2026, you’ll still be able to bring power banks on board, but won’t be permitted to use them until you land.
In 2025, Japan recorded 500,410 visitor arrivals from the UK — meaning this policy has the potential to affect millions of British tourists going forward.
Advertisement
While it’s the first country to crack down on portable chargers, over the past year, the devices have become a major pariah in the aviation space.
Dozens of airlines have adopted stricter regulations regarding their use, with 12 major airline groups having recently introduced bans.
Best of Metro Deals
Get exclusive discounts with Metro Deals – save on getaways and spa days. Powered by Wowcher
Bannatyne Spa: Spa day for two with treatments, lunch & prosecco — save up to 57% off.
The fire on the Air Busan plane triggered an immediate response from airlines across the world (Picture: Getty Images)
Why are power banks a problem on planes?
If a lithium-ion battery is damaged, misused, or stored improperly, it can short circuit — triggering a process called ‘thermal runaway’ where the batteries start to irreversibly overheat.
The result can be a sudden, violent, and explosive fire.
Advertisement
Concerns about allowing passengers to keep power banks in the cabin initially began to grow following an incident in January 2025, when a portable power bank caused a fire that engulfed and destroyed a passenger plane in South Korea.
First discovered by a flight attendant in an overhead luggage bin, the flames quickly spread throughout the entire cabin. Thankfully, everyone onboard was evacuated safely.
But this wasn’t an isolated incident.
According to the National Institute of Technology and Evaluation in Japan, portable battery chargers caused 123 fires in 2024, an increase of more than 150% from the 47 fires reported in 2020.
Advertisement
Different airlines all have their own specific set of rules (Picture: Getty Images)
Moreover, the Japanese fire agency, stated that by product type, power banks accounted for 30% of the 290 incidents in 2024, followed by power tools at 89 and mobile phones at 85.
While flights pose an exaggerated risk, given the intense pressure, faulty lithium-ion batteries can be lethal in all kinds of environments.
So, with all this in mind, it’s not surprising that more and more government bodies are cracking down on these particularly feisty fire hazards.
How will Japan’s power bank ban impact passengers?
The new ban, due to be introduced in April, will mean that all passengers travelling into and out of the country’s airports will be banned from using power banks onboard.
As part of a wider change to guidelines under the country’s Civil Aeronautics Act, travellers will reportedly be limited to a maximum of two portable chargers per person, not exceeding 160Wh, in carry-on luggage.
Advertisement
Fires caused by faulty power banks are on the rise (Picture: Getty Images)
Using power outlets to charge any kind of lithium-ion powered device on board will also be prohibited, as will storing them in overhead cabins.
This marks a rather radical change in Japan’s policies, especially given the fact that in July 2025, the country’s transport ministry explicitly permitted the use of power banks if they remained in sight at all times. However, now that’s all a distant memory.
In 2025, the country welcomed a record 42.7 million international arrivals, and although exact numbers for domestic travel aren’t available, Japan Airlines (JAL) alone operates over 130 routes across 64 regional airports.
Essentially, this move could have a major impact.
Which other airlines have banned power banks?
At the time of publication, the following airlines have banned the usage of power banks onboard its flights: