Connect with us

NewsBeat

Why Cindy Crawford’s own childhood trauma means she knows the agony her daughter Kaia is going through all too well

Published

on

For Cindy Crawford, who celebrated her milestone 60th birthday this year, the loss of her son Presley echoes that suffered by her own mother Jennifer, 50 years earlier

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Trump trolls Iran by renaming the Strait of Hormuz shipping route after himself

Published

on

Trump trolls Iran by renaming the Strait of Hormuz shipping route after himself

Donald Trump taunted Iran as he labelled the Strait of Hormuz “Trump Strait” after Tehran proposed a deal to open the key waterway within a week if the US meets certain conditions.

In a post on his Truth Social platform in the early hours of Saturday, the US president shared a picture of a map, with the shipping route labelled with his own name.

It comes after Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi presented a seven-day plan involving a ceasefire to American negotiators on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York this week. The conditions for Washington largely echo the ones agreed to in the June deal that fell apart.

They stated that Tehran would reopen the key waterway and resume talks on its nuclear programme but only if the US lifts its naval blockade, waives oil sanctions and observes a ceasefire that includes Lebanon.

Advertisement
Donald Trump's Truth Social post is his latest example of international ‘rebrandings’
Donald Trump’s Truth Social post is his latest example of international ‘rebrandings’ (Truth Social)

Lifting the US naval blockade of Iranian ports, as well as waiving sanctions on oil sales, would allow Tehran to ship out more of its crude and help its economy as its currency hits record lows and inflation soars.

Araqchi told reporters at the United Nations on Friday that the deal would trigger a seven-day countdown to reopening the strait and a pause in regional fighting.

“If there is seriousness on the US side to come to a deal and ⁠reopen the Strait of Hormuz, everything is now prepared,” he said.

The White House said it was engaged in “constructive discussions” via mediators, but a Wall St Journal report cited US officials as saying Trump was sceptical that Iran would meet his demands.

Trump’s Saturday Truth Social post is the latest example of him coming up with his own names for locations to attempt to make a political point.

Advertisement
Vessels near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, August 31, 2026
Vessels near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, August 31, 2026 (Reuters)

He posted a map on Truth Social of New Mexico earlier this month, but the word Mexico was crossed out and replaced with America.

‘Naming’ the southwestern state on the US-Mexico border as New America was reminiscent of an executive order he signed early in his second term, in which he changed the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.

In that January 2025 executive order titled “Restoring Names That Honor American Greatness,” Trump also changed the name of North America’s tallest peak, Denali in Alaska, back to Mount McKinley.

Trump’s controversial naming of America’s geography didn’t stop there. The president signed an executive order late last month changing the name of Lake Ontario to Lake America amid an escalating trade war with Canada.

Despite Trump repeatedly suggesting Canada become the nation’s 51st state, he recently told Fox News, “They think they’re a state, but they’re not a state. Why should we be subsidizing Canada?”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Sir Ranulph Fiennes’ family and friends call for investigation into his care | News UK

Published

on

Sir Ranulph Fiennes' family and friends call for investigation into his care | News UK
Sir Ranulph Fiennes family has called for his care arrangements to be investigated by a government agency (Picture: Getty Images)

Sir Ranulph Fiennes’ family and friends have called for his care to be urgently probed following reports he is being ‘illegally’ held in care homes.

The explorer, 82, has not been seen in public for two years and is believed to have been moved between care homes under false names.

His family are now demanding the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) to investigate the role of his wife, Louise Millington-Cotes, as his legal guardian.

One care home in Wales sounded the alarm that Sir Ranulph was being ‘unlawfully deprived of his liberty’ and that protocols were not being followed.

Advertisement

Alexander Millington-Cotes, who is estranged from his mother, said he had called the agency’s safeguarding team to pass on more information about his stepfather’s care, but had heard nothing in response.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

Start your day informed with Metro’s News Updates newsletter or get Breaking News alerts the moment it happens.

‘Of course the OPG should investigate – we would love them to investigate’, he told the Telegraph.

London, UNITED KINGDOM: British Explorer, Sir Ranulph Fiennes, aged 62, scales a climbing wall during a press conference in East London, 26 February 2007. Fiennes will attempt to climb the north face of the Eiger Mountain in the Swiss Alps in March 2007 to raise money for the Marie Curie charity which cares for terminally ill patients. Fiennes suffers from vertigo, a heart condition and has lost fingers from his left hand to frost bite. AFP PHOTO/CARL DE SOUZA (Photo credit should read CARL DE SOUZA/AFP via Getty Images)
The British explorer has not been seen in public for two years and is believed to have been moved between care homes in Cheshire and Wales (Picture: AFP)

Veteran BBC correspondent John Simpson, a friend of Sir Ranulph’s, said it must be known ‘what’s happening to him’, adding the explorer was the ‘world’s bravest man’ but also vulnerable.

He wrote on X: ‘Horrified to hear what’s happened to my good friend Ran Fiennes.

Advertisement

‘I’d like to tell the relevant authorities everything I know about the way he’s been treated. He’s the world’s bravest man, and he’s vulnerable. We must know what’s happening to him.’

Concerns have been raised over several instructions given by Mrs Millington-Cotes, including a ‘do not resuscitate’ document and medicines proscribed in her name.

Arabella McIntyre-Brown, the sister of Sir Ranulph’s first wife Ginny Fiennes, said reports of his physical state were ‘very worrying’ and added her name to those calling for the OPG to open an inquiry.

Explorer Sir Ranulph Fiennes and his wife Lady Louise, after returning to Britain following a failed attempt to climb Everest.
Sir Ranulph married horse trainer Louise Millington-Cotes in 2005 (Picture: PA)

Both friends and family members have been kept in the dark about Sir Ranulph’s whereabouts.

He is believed to have been moved between care homes in Cheshire and Wales, with only his wife and daughter in knowledge of his exact location.

Advertisement

Mrs Millington-Cotes reportedly went to extreme lengths to conceal Sir Ranulph’s identity, including insisting his wearing of a hat, sunglasses and gloves to prevent anyone recognising his face or frostbite-damaged fingers when out for walks.

The explorer married the former horse trainer, 23 years his junior, in 2005 after a failed attempt to climb Mount Everest.

Mrs Millington-Cotes has yet to comment on the allegations.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

Advertisement

For more stories like this, check our news page.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

The most affordable winter sun destinations for 2026: Post Office report lists countries where your money will go further – from Thailand to Tokyo

Published

on

Tokyo's shrugged off its reputation as a pricey destination, with the Post Office's new research saying it's possible to buy a bowl of ramen for less than £7

Each year the Post Office Travel Money Winter Sun Report reveals the best-value destinations for winter sun.

This year has seen Africa top the charts – but with a surprising Asian capital sneaking into the top three, and many intriguing European picks.

Based on eight holiday costs including coffee, beer, cola, wine, water, sunscreen, insect repellent and a three-course dinner, but excluding flights and accommodation, here’s the Post Office’s top five spots for sunshine on a budget – plus some affordable spots in Europe for those wanting to stay closer to home.

Escape to the Cape

For the second year running, Cape Town takes top prize. With its dramatic landscapes, fine wineries and top-tier attractions, the city promises a varied break buoyed by temperate weather.

Advertisement

Prices have fallen 9.7 per cent since March with a three-course meal for two with wine costing £39.26. Our tips? Try pizza joint Borruso’s on Kenilworth Main Road for a ‘Dillon Special’ of bacon, ham and chicken for £7.84, or head to trendy suburb Woodstock for fish sliders and ceviche tacos at Pot Luck Club from £7.55.

Coffees average £1.76, or enjoy a bottle of beer from £1.86. Butter All Day, a buzzy joint in the city centre, is great for both.

Book it: British Airways Holidays offers seven nights’ B&B at The President Hotel, Sea Point, from £1,776pp including flights (britishairways.com).

Advertisement

Tokyo’s shrugged off its reputation as a pricey destination, with the Post Office’s new research saying it’s possible to buy a bowl of ramen for less than £7

Cheap in Kenya

Another spot for sun without splurging is Mombasa, Kenya’s oldest city. A glass of wine in this relaxed seaside resort costs £3.17, and a meal for two £42.78, including wine. Buzzy beach bar Char-Choma, on Mombasa beach, has visitors raving about its seafood and upbeat atmosphere.

Book it: Spend seven nights’ all-inclusive at the Voyager Beach Resort from £1,505pp, including flights (tui.co.uk).

Tokyo for less

Despite its reputation as expensive, Tokyo has muscled into third place. While not a traditional ‘winter sun’ destination, the city gets 520 hours of sunshine in the colder months, making sampling the city’s myriad delights all the more pleasant.

Advertisement

A three-course meal for two here totals £48.50, with Michelin-starred joints such as Nakiryu, in Otsuka, even included in this category, where steaming bowls of shoryu ramen are priced from £6.72.

Whether you’re into matcha or coffee, sampling Tokyo’s caffeinated offerings is also an affordable venture, with prices from £2.33. Make like Tokyoites and head for Onibus Coffee in chichi neighbourhood Nakameguro, or Fuglen in Shibuya.

Book it: Spend four nights in Tokyo at the Shiba Park Hotel from £1,132.50pp, including flights (britishairways.com).

A bottle of beer in Sri Lanka costs £2.27 according to the latest report

A bottle of beer in Sri Lanka costs £2.27 according to the latest report

Advertisement

Join the discussion

Should winter sun getaways be all about finding the cheapest deals or once-in-a-lifetime experiences?

Sri Lankan bargains

For those after a more traditional dose of beach bliss, Colombo in Sri Lanka offers an affordable break, with a barometer cost of £74.79 a day. A bottle of beer costs £2.27, while a bottle of water is 66p.

Book it: Stay in Colombo’s five-star Mandarina Hotel from £63 a night in January (mandarinacolombo.com). Return flights to Colombo from £741 (britishairways.com). 

Advertisement

Tempting Thailand

Thailand’s lively island Phuket similarly fits the bill – start the party with a bottle of beer for an average of £2.09. A three-course evening meal for two with house wine comes to £51.30.

Book it: Doubles at the Blu Monkey Boutique in Phuket start at £37 (blumonkeyboutiquephukettown.com).

What about the rest?

Portugal’s Algarve was sixth cheapest in this year, with a barometer cost of £82.35 a day. Putting in a similarly strong performance were Spain’s popular Costa del Sol, where a cup of coffee is just £1.75, and Tenerife in the Canary Islands, with a barometer cost of £87.62. Penang, Malaysia and Punta Cana in the Dominican Republic rounded out the top ten.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Charles brothers reflect on special night for Northern Ireland after win over Georgia

Published

on

Belfast Live

Pierce Charles saved a penalty and his brother Shea Charles scored the winner as Northern Ireland beat Georgia 1-0 in their Nations League clash in Tbilisi

Brothers Pierce and Shea Charles shared a memorable post-match celebration after playing pivotal roles in Northern Ireland’s historic first Nations League away victory.

Pierce saved Khvicha Kvaratskhelia’s 65th-minute penalty before Shea dramatically sealed a 1-0 win over Georgia with virtually the final kick of the match, nine minutes into added time in Tbilisi.

Pierce produced a series of outstanding stops throughout the game, including a superb reflex save to deny Georges Mikautadze at close range early in the second half. Meanwhile, Shea commanded the midfield and, by his own admission, should have broken the deadlock earlier than he did in the Group B2 encounter.

Advertisement

While the brothers have shared plenty of special international moments before, this one surpassed them all.

“We’re just proud to make the family back home so happy,” Pierce said. “I’m happy for Shea as well but it was never in doubt, he performs like that in every game.”

Shea echoed his brother’s sentiments. When asked what it was like watching Pierce face Paris St Germain’s Ballon d’Or contender Kvaratskhelia, he said: “I always back Pierce.

“Patrick Kelly came up and said to me, ‘He’s going to save this’. Yeah, he’s done really well to save it and made a few other really good saves. It’s a credit to him for the win.”

Advertisement

For his part, Pierce brushed off the notion that facing a player of Kvaratskhelia’s calibre brought any added pressure. “There’s no pressure on me, so I back myself all day to save it,” the 21-year-old declared, currently on loan at QPR following his return to Manchester City.

“You do your research before the game and it has paid off.

“At the end of the day, it’s a penalty, all of them are from 12 yards. He’s a great player. I just focus on myself and I saved it.”

Pierce, still just 21, has established himself as first choice goalkeeper, but this represented his finest performance yet at international level as he helped Northern Ireland secure their first competitive away clean sheet since October 2024 – which coincidentally came on his debut against Belarus.

Advertisement

“It just shows far the team has come,” he reflected. “It’s a team achievement keeping a clean sheet, like scoring a goal. The team can be so happy.”

While Pierce earned the player of the match award, Shea could equally have claimed the accolade after dominating proceedings in the centre of the park, clearly brimming with confidence following his summer transfer to Fulham.

“The two boys were brilliant,” Michael O’Neill commented. “I thought Pierce played extremely well, not just his distribution but he makes a big save in the second half as well.

“But he gives you a great range of control because of his passing and everything around that. He gives the back three a lot of security because they know they can go back there.

Advertisement

“And I thought Shea and Ethan (Galbraith) were both brilliant in midfield. Shea was colossal. Not just on the ball, but I felt physically, his ability to step past people, the amount of times he was fouled and the referee for some reason didn’t want to produce a card despite the number of fouls on him.

“But I thought he was fabulous.”

Click here to sign up to our sport newsletter, bringing you the latest sports news, headlines and top stories.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

The bucket list city building that ‘you must see in your lifetime’

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

The landmark is much-loved among locals and visitors

A historic landmark in a beautiful city has been named among a list of buildings that people “must see” in their lifetime. The Telegraph has revealed its list of 20 buildings across the world that you must visit in your lifetime and Ely’s historic cathedral is one of them.

Advertisement

Describing Ely Cathedral, The Telegraph said: “Rising above the frigid East Anglian fens, Ely’s greatest glory grew from catastrophe. In 1322 its Norman crossing tower collapsed.

“It was replaced with an oak octagon, lead-covered from above, luminous from below, which is unparalleled in any church in any nation. Unusually we know the names of the architect and carpenter who conceived and shaped this miracle: Alan of Walsingham and William Hurley.”

Ely is the second smallest city in England and its most famous attribute is the gorgeous cathedral. It is the third longest medieval cathedral in England, at 161m. It has several notable features that draw in visitors including the West Tower, its 14th-century Octagon Tower and its unique wooden lantern.

The West Tower was completed in 1189. It reaches 66m high and there are 288 steps up to the top. The 14th-century Octagon tower and its unique wooden lantern is considered one of the wonders of the medieval world, according to the cathedral’s website. It took 20 years to build and cost £2,406.

Advertisement

Thecathedral has raving reviews on Google, with 4.7 stars out of five among more than 7,000 reviews. One person said: “I’ve seen some of the finest cathedrals in the world and Ely is up there with the best of them. What a wonderful experience we had.”

Another visitor said it “fulfilled a lifelong ambition to visit this elephantine-looking place of worship”, adding that the cathedral “surpassed all my expectations”.

Meanwhile, someone else said: “Ely Cathedral is absolutely stunning. The architecture is breath-taking, especially the unique Octagon Tower and the spacious Lady Chapel. Inside, every detail feels majestic yet peaceful.”

Three services are held at the cathedral each day of the year for anyone to join. Visitors can tour the architecture, learn about its history and enjoy panoramic views by booking visitor tickets for £14. Children under the age of 16 can enter for free.

Advertisement

There are also options for tours of the Octagon Tower, Ground Floor or a West Tower experience.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

How popular is your – and your child’s – name? Use our search tool to see which baby names truly set you apart from the crowds…

Published

on

How popular is your - and your child's - name? Use our search tool to see which baby names truly set you apart from the crowds...

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Noel Gallagher pleads for Man City NOT to be punished with club facing threat of relegation as superfan opens up on his ‘shock’ after learning of bombshell 115 verdict

Published

on

Noel Gallagher, a close friend of Pep Guardiola, says the fans and players should not be punished after City were found guilty of the vast majority of the 115 charges

Advertisement

Oasis superstar and Manchester City fan Noel Gallagher has pleaded for mercy after his club were found guilty of the vast majority of the 115 financial charges levelled against them.

Gallagher, alongside brother and bandmate Liam, is a big City fan and regularly attends games with his sons.

He is also close friends with former manager Pep Guardiola, and went into the club’s dressing room after they won the 2018-19 Premier League title.

Gallagher has been left reeling after it was revealed that City have been found guilty of the vast majority of the 115 financial charges against them – casting doubt on the legitimacy of their trophy-laden spell under the club’s Abu Dhabi ownership.

Advertisement

The Oasis songwriter revealed he has been left in ‘shock’ by the verdict, but implored football’s decision-making bodies not to punish the supporters or players for ‘whatever goes on in the boardroom’. 

‘A little surprised because only that the club has assured us all along that they would vehemently deny any of these charges,’ he said on the Let Me Talk podcast. 

‘So it was a bit of a shock to find out we’ve been found guilty of all but one but really overall quite sad really, sad for the fans and for the players.

Advertisement

Noel Gallagher, a close friend of Pep Guardiola, says the fans and players should not be punished after City were found guilty of the vast majority of the 115 charges

‘Our focus as fans is always on the pitch and we know what we saw: they won it on the pitch. Whatever goes on in the boardroom it’s nothing to do with the supporters or the players, the players won the game and won that (2011-12) title on the pitch. 

‘Whether some of those players should have been there or not, that’s nothing to do with the fans. We were there, we know what we saw. Does it taint it? I suppose in the eyes of everybody else in England it would but I know what I saw and I know what I felt.’

City are set to appeal the decision but any punishment is now expected to follow, with some fans calling for the club to be stripped of the trophies they won at the time.

Advertisement

There had initially been confusion around the time period that the charges relate to, with the initial offences ranging from the 2009-10 season to the 2017-18 campaign.

There are then further charges surrounding failure to comply with the investigation, which range from December 2018 to February 2023.

It remains unclear what any punishment could be, though the threat of relegation appears a legitimate possibility. 

Gallagher joked a fortnight ago that his ‘heart is full of pride’ after his 15-year-old son flipped his middle finger at Man United fans during City’s derby win at Old Trafford.

Advertisement

Sonny Gallagher celebrated alongside his brother Donovan, 18, and their Oasis rockstar father Noel, 59, in the stands 62 minutes into the game, with City a man down after Phil Foden‘s red card.

The teenager flipped off rival fans in the stands and jeered as star striker Haaland netted in the second-half what later proved to be the winner.

  • READ: The clubs who could seek compensation as Premier League sides consider legal action after Man City found guilty of vast majority of rule breaches – and what happens next: Key questions answered 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

The clubs who could seek compensation as Premier League sides consider legal action after Man City found guilty of vast majority of rule breaches – and what happens next: Key questions answered

Published

on

Manchester City have been found guilty of the vast majority of their 115 Premier League rule-break charges

Manchester City have been found guilty of the vast majority of their rule-break charges concerning the Premier League’s financial regulations.

The competition accused the club of widespread financial cheating over an era of sustained success – with an independent panel hearing concluding in 2024.

The long-awaited verdict has now been reached with the belief it is a victory for the Premier League, despite Man City having strenuously denied the charges. 

The verdict could lead to a variety of punishments including huge points deductions, financial penalties, and even relegation.

Advertisement

Daily Mail Sport’s Mike Keegan provides answers to the key questions, including the next steps, Man City’s expected appeal and how serious the punishment could be.

Manchester City have been found guilty of the vast majority of their 115 Premier League rule-break charges 

WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

Advertisement

This cannot be viewed as anything other than an overwhelming victory for the Premier League. 

To see Manchester City found guilty of the ‘vast majority’ of the 115 charges is an outcome that Richard Masters will no doubt see as vindication for what has been a costly, long-running legal battle in which the stakes were incredibly high. 

It is safe to assume that had the tables turned the other way, the chief executive would have been in P45 territory. 

More important than that, those who City feel were the key protagonists, the so-called ‘Red Cartel’, will also feel vindication. 

Advertisement

To put it simply, Manchester City have been found guilty of cheating their way to success between 2009 and 2018, a period when they dominated English football.

The verdict cannot be viewed as anything other than an overwhelming victory for the Premier League and its chief executive Richard Masters

The verdict cannot be viewed as anything other than an overwhelming victory for the Premier League and its chief executive Richard Masters

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

There has been no statement from the Premier League, while City’s only says that the process remains ongoing and is subject to strict confidentiality. 

Advertisement

What is clear is that City will appeal. What is not clear is whether the sanction will drop before any appeal.

WHAT ARE THE PUNISHMENTS?

Take your pick. Hefty points deductions, potential relegation and transfer bans are all on the table. Rule W51 in the Premier League handbook states ambiguously that ‘such other penalty as it shall think fit’ is an option.

There is, however, a scepticism among some, based on a lack of noise from many of the other clubs and the lenient punishment recently handed to Chelsea that whatever penalty lands will not see City stripped of titles or relegated. ‘They’ll get a slap on the wrist and ordered to pay legal costs and not much else,’ one exec predicted.

Advertisement
The verdict could lead to a variety of punishments including huge points deductions, financial penalties, and even relegation

The verdict could lead to a variety of punishments including huge points deductions, financial penalties, and even relegation

HOW DOES AN APPEAL WORK?

In all likelihood City will appeal and recent cases tell us that they tend to be dealt with expeditiously. 

An appeal board would be set up, appointed by the chair of the panel and, again, featuring three people. Some feel that this would be an exercise in the Premier League marking its own homework. 

Advertisement

At this early stage, it is worth an assumption that City could argue the panel was not impartial. The bad news for them, however, is that this is a high bar to clear.

Unlike City’s case with UEFA, it cannot go to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (who overturned UEFA’s findings).

WHAT ABOUT COMPENSATION?

Last year, in a move believed to have been instigated by former Arsenal chief executive Tim Lewis, the Gunners, Tottenham Hotspur, Liverpool and Manchester United served legal notices reserving their right to take action. 

Advertisement

Should the verdict stand, they will then seek damages for a wide variety of issues. The most costly claims are likely to come from those who say they missed out on Champions League qualification during the period in question thanks to City’s law breaking. But the scope would not end there. 

Clubs could also, for example, argue that as a result of the breaches they were unable to sign a calibre of player that would have allowed them to be more successful on the field. Some believe £200m would not be out of the question, but that remains to be seen.

Ex-Arsenal chief executive is understood to have instigated a move last year that saw the Gunners, Tottenham, Liverpool and Man United served legal notices reserving their right to take action

Ex-Arsenal chief executive is understood to have instigated a move last year that saw the Gunners, Tottenham, Liverpool and Man United served legal notices reserving their right to take action

WHAT ABOUT THE INDEPENDENT FOOTBALL REGULATOR?

Advertisement

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Regulator declined to comment when contacted by Daily Mail Sport. However, David Kogan will be well aware of the situation. 

The IFR was brought in for a variety of reasons, not least to ensure that those owning the nation’s football clubs were fit and proper to do so. The IFR would have the power to force City’s owners to sell, but such a scenario is viewed as unlikely.

DIDN’T CITY TRIUMPH OVER THE PREMIER LEAGUE RECENTLY ON SPONSORSHIP RULES?

They did, with three senior judges deeming the rules unlawful. As a result, a series of amendments were made. City again launched a legal challenge, but surprisingly came to an agreement with the Premier League in September. Those cases, however, were always separate to the 115, as it became known.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

the real medieval revolt that inspired Andrew Garfield’s new film

Published

on

the real medieval revolt that inspired Andrew Garfield’s new film

The Uprising, a medieval drama directed by Paul Greengrass and starring Andrew Garfield, is set to hit cinemas this autumn. The film draws its inspiration from the Peasants’ Revolt of 1381 in England.

The studio’s synopsis presents the uprising as a “rebellion against the tyranny of King Richard II”, with Garfield leading “an army of the people to face the king’s might in a fight for justice and survival”. Yet medieval accounts of the uprising describe the rebels as loyal to Richard.

The Anonimalle Chronicle, an anonymous 14th-century account written at St Mary’s Abbey in York by a probable eyewitness of the revolt, reported that the rebels had a watchword among themselves. The challenge was “with whom haldes [holds] yow?” – to which the appropriate reply was said to be: “Wyth kynge Richarde and wyth the trew communes [commoners].” Anyone who provided the wrong answer was said to have been put to death.

What, then, were the aims of the rebels portrayed in the film, and why were they seemingly so loyal to the king?

Advertisement



À lire aussi :
Who were the ‘peasants’ of the 1381 Peasants’ Revolt? New database has answers


The aims of the rebels

The uprising of 1381 was in part caused by widespread discontent at government corruption. Richard succeeded to the throne in 1377 at just ten years old. His young reign was largely overseen by his uncle, John of Gaunt, and royal councillors.

The hundred years war (1337-1453) between England and France was going badly for the English cause, and the crown needed to raise money. It turned to a new form of taxation. The deeply unpopular “poll taxes” were raised three times in five years (1377, 1379 and 1381) – the last of which triggered the uprising.

The trailer for The Uprising.

Medieval chroniclers had little sympathy for the rebels. Yet even the Anonimalle Chronicle reported that it seemed the taxation “had not been properly or honestly collected, but had been raised from the poor people and not the rich to the great profit and advantage of the collectors”.

Advertisement

The rebels did not blame the king himself, but rather those around him who had misspent this money. This was a common political tactic in medieval England, whereby critics of the government blamed the king’s corrupt advisers.

During the parliament of Edward III’s reign in 1376, it had been claimed that various people “have in their hands without the king’s knowledge his wealth and treasure”.

Similar complaints were made in 1381. The Anonimalle Chronicle reported that the rebels said they had risen to save the king, “and to destroy traitors to him and the kingdom”.

The rebels had very specific targets in mind. They destroyed the Savoy Palace in London belonging to John of Gaunt, along with his household possessions. In his contemporary chronicle, Henry Knighton described how one rebel stole a fine piece of silver there – only to be thrown into the fire by other rebels who said “they were lovers of truth and justice, not robbers and thieves”.

Advertisement

A 15th-century depiction of the murder of Simon of Sudbury and Sir Robert Hales at the Tower of London.
British Library

The rebels besieged the Tower of London and managed to enter it. Among others, they seized and beheaded the archbishop of Canterbury, Simon Sudbury, who was also the chancellor of England, and Sir Robert Hales, the treasurer of England. Both men were held directly responsible for the poll taxes by the rebels.

Thomas Walsingham, a 14th-century monk of St Albans Abbey, questioned how the rebels managed to extract them from the tower. He claimed there were 600 men at arms and 600 archers garrisoned there – and accused them of cowardice, saying they were “inclined to appear more like the dead than the living” in allowing the rebels to take the officials.

When the king finally met the rebels at Mile End, the Anonimalle Chronicle reported that the rebels were said to have knelt before him, saying: “Welcome our lord king Richard, if it pleases you, and we will not have any other king but you.”

Advertisement
A clip from The Uprising.

An end to serfdom

The rebels’ complaints went far beyond government corruption. They also wanted an end to all serfdom.

Serfs were forced to work the land for their lords and had many legal restrictions on their lives. Serfdom was seen as degrading and heavily resented by the peasantry.

Some of the demands of the rebels included that there should be no outlawry – a harsh legal penalty which meant anyone was technically allowed to kill an outlawed criminal. They also demanded that there should be no lords except the king himself; that the goods of the church be divided among the people of the parish; and that there should be no serfdom but that all men should be free.

They also targeted written records. The Anonimalle Chronicle reported that they “burnt all the register books and chancery remembrancers’ rolls” they found at Lambeth Palace. And they destroyed Temple Bar, including the “many muniments which the lawyers were keeping in custody”.

Advertisement
A medieval illustration of Richard II meeting with the rebels of the Peasants' Revolt of 1381.
A medieval illustration of Richard II meeting with the rebels of the Peasants’ Revolt of 1381.
Bibliothèque nationale de France

The young king Richard acceded to many of the rebels’ demands. Knighton described how the king granted a charter under his great seal “declaring that all men in the realm of England should be free”. After the suppression of the uprising, however, the charter was “quashed, annulled and adjudged worthless”.

The uprising was unsuccessful in many of the rebels’ aims. It was harshly suppressed and many of its leaders were tried and executed. Wat Tyler, a key leader of the revolt, was killed by William Walworth, the mayor of London, at Smithfield.

Yet the rebels had found their voice, one which resonated across England. The poll taxes were, after all, discontinued – and would not to be resurrected for centuries. Serfdom, already in decline, withered and died.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Fury v Joshua Cardiff fight close to collapse after dramatic overnight attack

Published

on

Wales Online

Tyson Fury has claimed the fight at the Principality Stadium is now in serious jeopardy and blamed Eddie Hearn

Tyson Fury’s blockbuster fight with Anthony Joshua could collapse in what would be a huge blow to Cardiff and the Principality Stadium.

Advertisement

The long-awaited Battle of Britain was only officially confirmed on Wednesday, with Fury and Joshua due to meet at the Principality Stadium on December 11 in what promised to be one of the biggest sporting events ever staged in Wales.

But just over 24 hours later, the fight has been thrown into chaos after Fury claimed Joshua and his promoter Eddie Hearn are now refusing to fight and a replacement bout is being looked at.

The dramatic developments have raised fresh doubts over whether the heavyweight showdown will actually go ahead in Cardiff, with a dispute over the involvement of UFC president Dana White could threaten the £150m blockbuster.

Respected boxing journalist Mike Coppinger of The Ring reports the fight could be called off because of “issues”, with a replacement fight involving Terence Crawford and Ryan Garcia being considered.

Advertisement

Fury fighting unified cruiserweight champion David Benavidez is also said to be another option being discussed.

Then, overnight, Fury launched a furious attack on Joshua and Hearn in a series of videos posted on Instagram.

“Breaking news, AJ and Eddie are trying to pull out of the fight,” Fury said. “They’re saying they are not going to fight now.

“It’s mainly to do with Eddie Hearn’s ego. He’s making up a million different things.”

Advertisement

Fury then directly addressed Joshua, saying: “AJ, pull your finger out you little white-flagged, yellow-bellied coward.”

He also warned that Saudi boxing supremo Turki Alalshikh was now looking at alternatives.

“Now you’ve got Turki Alalshikh finding alternative real men who will fight at the drop of a hat,” Fury added.

Advertisement

In a second video, Fury again blamed Hearn’s dispute with White for putting the fight at risk.

“So Eddie Hearn’s ego is trying to cost us and all the boxing fans around the world, the fight the whole world has been waiting for over a decade,” he said.

“And it is all because Eddie doesn’t want someone in the building. It’s pathetic and childish.”

Hearn has insisted that White cannot be involved in the contest because of the terms of the contract signed by Joshua.

White, who runs Zuffa Boxing alongside Alalshikh, has been billed as the lead promoter for the showdown, with Wednesday’s official announcement stating that Alalshikh and White “will collaborate to promote this historic showdown”.

However, Hearn was not named in that announcement and has publicly maintained that White cannot be involved.

The dispute has now spilled into the open, with Alalshikh appearing to back White by posting a picture of the UFC boss smoking a cigar on social media.

Advertisement

Fury also posted a mocked-up fight poster featuring himself against Benavidez, appearing to hint at a possible replacement for Joshua.

The possibility of the Fury-Joshua fight disappearing from Cardiff would represent a huge blow to the Welsh capital, which only secured the contest after a lengthy battle over its location.

Hearn had initially pushed for Wembley Stadium, while the Saudi backers behind the fight had explored the possibility of staging it in New York.

But Cardiff’s Principality Stadium ultimately won the race, with its retractable roof and willingness to accommodate a late-night finish securing the event.

Advertisement

The fight is expected to have a ring walk around 2am to suit the American audience for its Netflix broadcast.

It was supposed to be a spectacular night for Cardiff, with tens of thousands of fans expected to descend on the Welsh capital for the first meeting between two of Britain’s biggest heavyweight stars.

Instead, the event has been plunged into uncertainty before the fighters have even faced each other at a press conference.

For Cardiff, the stakes are significant.

Advertisement

The Principality Stadium has previously hosted some of the biggest nights in British boxing, including Anthony Joshua’s world heavyweight title fight against Carlos Takam and Joe Calzaghe’s famous fight against Mikkel Kessler in 2007.

But Fury against Joshua had promised to take things to another level, with the two most recognisable British heavyweights of their generation finally meeting after more than a decade of anticipation.

The contest is understood to be worth around £150m, with Fury and Joshua each expected to pocket around £75m.

The event will also have brought a huge international audience to Cardiff, while providing a major boost for the city’s hospitality sector.

Advertisement

Fury and Joshua are due to attend a pre-fight press conference in London on September 30.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending