Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Chancellor Merz’s first year: A report card

Published

on

Chancellor Merz’s first year: A report card

Andreas Busch assesses German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s first year in office. He scores his performance in different areas and highlights his key successes and challenges.

A year ago, when Friedrich Merz was elected Chancellor I wrote on this site that his background in business and transatlantic networks would draw him especially to foreign policy. With both the Chancellery and the Foreign Office in CDU hands for the first time in almost sixty years, the ingredients for a more coherent German foreign policy seemed to be in place. One year on, the picture is more complicated than that early optimism suggested.

Merz did indeed hit the ground running on the international stage. Even before taking office, he had engineered Germany’s most consequential fiscal policy shift in a generation: a constitutional reform of the debt brake passed with the outgoing Bundestag, unlocking a €500 billion infrastructure fund and exempting defence spending above one per cent of GDP from borrowing limits. The geopolitical rationale was explicit — the Trump administration’s unpredictability, the continuing war in Ukraine, and the infamous Oval Office encounter between Trump and Zelenskyy. Merz invoked Mario Draghi’s ‘whatever it takes’ to justify a sharp U-turn for a party that had made fiscal discipline a core identity marker.

Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, a CDU colleague and former defence spokesman, proved a competent partner. The government navigated the Gaza crisis with more nuance than its predecessor, temporarily restricting arms exports that could be used in Gaza in August 2025 before lifting the restrictions after a ceasefire in November. On migration — the issue that dominated the election campaign — Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (CSU) acted from day one intensifying border controls and ordering the rejection of asylum seekers at Germany’s internal EU borders. He even pressed on when a Berlin administrative court ruled the rejection of three Somali asylum seekers at the Polish border unlawful.

Advertisement

Yet for all the foreign policy ambition, domestic politics refused to stay in the background.

The CDU/CSU–SPD coalition — the fifth grand coalition in the Federal Republic’s history but by far the smallest, with just 52 per cent of Bundestag seats — has been beset by conflict from the start. With a working majority of only twelve seats, every backbench rebellion becomes an existential drama.

The pattern was set early. In July, the coalition’s agreed candidate for the Federal Constitutional Court, Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, had to withdraw after CDU backbenchers revolted over her positions on abortion, demonstrating that the party leadership could not control its own parliamentary group on sensitive issues.

In the autumn, Merz promised a ‘real change’ in social policy. Critics soon labelled it the ‘autumn of commissions’ — expert panels substituting for decisions. The pattern is familiar in German politics but sits poorly with a Chancellor who promised a departure from the Merkel era’s incremental caution.

Advertisement

The most dangerous episode came in December, when eighteen younger CDU/CSU members — the so-called ‘pension rebels’ — threatened to block a pension stabilisation package. With the coalition’s majority razor-thin, even a small revolt could bring down legislation. In the end, the package passed with just two votes to spare, leaving ‘deep scars in the coalition and within the Union.’

The SPD, meanwhile, has struggled with its role as junior partner. Party chair Bärbel Bas called Merz’s suggestion that Germany could no longer afford its welfare state in its current form ‘bullshit’ — hardly the language of a harmonious coalition. When Merz made an ill-judged remark about ‘the problem’ still visible ‘in the cityscape’ in relation to migration, SPD deputy faction leader Wiebke Esdar joined the resulting street protests.

The coalition’s most serious public rupture came in April 2026, when Economics Minister Katherina Reiche (CDU) openly attacked Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil (SPD) over his proposals for a windfall profits tax and energy price relief. Crisis talks that were to lead to a package of ‘comprehensive reforms’ instead only produced an emergency fuel tax cut of 17 cents per litre for two months — an echo of the Scholz government’s ‘Tankrabatt’ in 2022, a questionable energy policy, and a disappointment when compared to announcements beforehand.

The public has noticed. The ZDF Politbarometer in mid-April showed government satisfaction at a record low of 27%. Merz’s own approval had fallen to 30%, and only 18% rated coalition cooperation as good. Most strikingly, polling now puts the AfD ahead of the CDU/CSU — the governing coalition would no longer have a parliamentary majority if an election were held today.

Advertisement

Asked whether the coalition would last until the next scheduled election in 2029, Merz offered a notably un-reassuring answer: ‘Nobody can guarantee anything.’, Recently, however, the Merz cabinet managed to agree both on the fundamentals of the 2027 budget and a reform of the health system that is to help solve the latter’s deficit problem by producing savings of approximately €15 billion. If  this gets passed in the Bundestag, the coalition may in the future look back on this as a turning point.

So how would one grade Chancellor Merz’s first year? In the spirit of the German school system (where 1 is the best mark and 6 is the worst):

Foreign and security policy: 2 (good). The debt brake reform was bold and consequential. Merz has established himself as a credible interlocutor in European capitals and handled the Gaza situation with more agility than Scholz. The alignment of Chancellery and Foreign Office has delivered the coherence I predicted a year ago.

Domestic reform: 4 (adequate). The ‘autumn of commissions’ label stings because it is fair. The welfare-to-work rebrand (from Bürgergeld to Grundsicherung) is largely cosmetic. The pension deal nearly collapsed. The new military service model is an awkward compromise. The ambition is there; the delivery is not.

Advertisement

Coalition management: 4 (barely adequate). A majority of twelve seats would test any leader, but the repeated near-misses — the investiture fiasco, the pension rebellion, the Reiche–Klingbeil blow-up — suggest a Chancellor who has not yet found a reliable method for managing his own side, let alone his coalition partner.

Communication: 5 (poor). The ‘cityscape’ gaffe, the ‘bullshit’ exchange, the nobody can guarantee anything’ — Merz repeatedly creates unnecessary turbulence through imprecise or provocative language. For a Chancellor who hired a respected foreign policy journalist as government spokesman, the domestic messaging has been surprisingly clumsy.

Overall: 3 (satisfactory, with reservations). Merz has shown that he can act decisively when the stakes are high enough — the debt brake reform proved that. But his first year has also revealed a government that lurches from crisis to crisis, held together more by the absence of alternatives than by shared purpose.

The SPD is visibly unhappy but trapped: the FDP’s experience of walking out of the Scholz coalition and being punished by voters serves as a cautionary tale. Whether that deterrent holds through three more years of austerity arguments and migration rows is the central question of German politics heading into 2027.

Advertisement

By Andreas Busch, Professor of Political Science, University of Göttingen.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

‘Frame Mogging’ And ‘Jestermaxxing’ Explained For Parents

Published

on

What Does 'Mid' Mean And Why Does Gen Z Kids Say It?

If you’ve heard your kids talk about looksmaxxing, mewing, jestermaxxing, or more recently, frame mogging, it might be time to gently explore where all this is coming from.

For those who aren’t chronically online and have absolutely no knowledge of these terms, I’ll quickly help fill you in on what they mean – and why you should keep a closer eye on your teen’s behaviour if you hear them discussing these terms.

What is looksmaxxing?

‘Looksmaxxing’ describes the improvement of physical appearance, commonly through a number of practices which range in intensity – from using skincare to undergoing surgery.

Advertisement

While there’s nothing wrong in wanting to take pride in your appearance – indeed, having a skincare routine and using SPF, staying hydrated, eating a balanced diet and exercising are all great ways to look after yourself – looksmaxxing can take things to the extremes.

It’s a phenomenon that’s been catapulted from the manosphere – a collection of websites and forums that typically promote masculinity, some of which amplify misogynistic views – to the mainstream.

One online streamer known as Clavicular claims to have “looksmaxxed” himself from the age of 14 through a combination of exercise, steroids, surgery and taking a hammer to his face (also referred to as “bonesmashing”).

But experts have concerns over how the quest to looksmaxx impacts teens during a crucial period in development – and a time when self-esteem is typically pretty low.

Advertisement

Dr Candice O’Neil, psychologist at Ontic Psychology, previously told Patient looksmaxxing has the potential to “influence young people’s feelings about themselves and behaviours both implicitly and overtly”.

She explained: “This becomes unhealthy when it moves from general self-improvement and wellbeing practices into a preoccupation with their appearance – particularly when that involves constant comparison with others or extreme adjustments to food and exercise. This can also lead to deep feelings of poor self-worth and self-concept.”

Over time, this might begin to impact a person’s mental health and potentially lead to disordered eating, body dysmorphia, obsessive and compulsive behaviours, or self-harm.

What is mewing?

Advertisement

Mewing is one of the practices some are trying in the pursuit of looksmaxxing. It involves pressing the tongue firmly against the roof of your mouth, with a view to reshape the jawline.

Does it work? Dr Baldeep Farmah, aesthetic doctor at Dr Aesthetica, said “no credible research supports the jaw restructuring looksmaxxing communities promise”.

What is jestermaxxing?

Similar to looksmaxxing, but the focus is on being funny or hilarious, rather than physical self improvement. While there’s nothing wrong with having a laugh and joking around, some parents are noticing their teens are, once again, taking it to the extremes.

Advertisement

One parent shared on Reddit that their 16-year-old son was ‘jestermaxxing’ at home non-stop: “He’ll just interrupt us at dinner with some loud random joke or impression then stare at everyone waiting for a huge reaction … Family time is exhausting because it’s like he’s performing all the time instead of just talking normally.”

They added: “He used to talk about girls like a normal teenager but now he says things like ‘foids [a derogatory term for women] only respect you if you jestermaxx correctly’ which I had to search and it made me feel sick.”

What is frame mogging?

More recently, kids have been talking about frame mogging, but to understand the meaning of that one, we need to first define mogging, which means outperforming or dominating over someone.

Advertisement
Per TikTok creator and teacher Mr Philip Lindsay, “mog comes from the word AMOG which stands for ‘alpha male of the group’, and that word comes from an extremely toxic group of people who prioritise money, looks and misogyny”.

He added frame mogging “comes from a really toxic thought process that is good [for parents] to be aware of”.

When Clavicular was approached to take a photo with a fraternity leader, and the photo was posted online, his followers joked he’d been “frame mogged” as the fraternity leader was bigger built.

So, in short: frame mogging means you’re showing someone up by being more muscular. And in these communities, muscle apparently equals ‘alpha male’.

Much of this stems from incel communities

Advertisement

A lot of these terms stem from incel (involuntary celibate) communities online, made up of men who forge a sense of identity around their perceived inability to form sexual or romantic relationships.

They might say this is because of how they look or because they’re “low status”. Either way, much of their anger is directed at women.

These views and terms have trickled down into mainstream culture through manosphere influencers – who, as HuffPost’s Brittany Wong puts it, “mask their misogyny in self-help, fitness tips and ‘pickup artist’-style dating advice”.

According to Educate Against Hate, boys are drawn to this kind of content because it offers a sense of belonging, simple answers to complex societal problems, and an element of control or empowerment.

Nearly 70% of boys aged 11-14 years old have been exposed to misogynistic content online, per Ofcom, and most primary and secondary school teachers are “extremely concerned” about the influence of the manosphere on children and young people.

Advertisement

While there will be plenty of boys who shun these narratives, over time this content can – and does – subtly shift perceptions.

Talk to your kids about it

If you notice your son using these terms, your best bet is to stay curious and keep the lines of communication open.

Staying non-judgemental and asking open-ended questions, like “What do you like about that content?” or “How did you come across that idea?”, is key.

Advertisement

Fiona Yassin, a family psychotherapist and founder and clinical director of The Wave Clinic, previously told HuffPost UK: “It’s important for parents to name what’s happening. For example, acknowledging that there are online spaces where relationships are framed transactionally – where worth is tied to wealth, appearance, or sexual history.”

Parents can show awareness, and therefore signal understanding, without endorsement, she said. You could say something like: “I understand this is something people are talking about right now.”

Teaching and encouraging critical thinking is important, as is reinforcing your family values.

Check out more tips on speaking to kids about misogyny here.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Barack Obama Explains Why He’s ‘Worried’ About Both Democrats And Republicans

Published

on

The late Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) receives the 2017 Liberty Medal from former Vice President Joe Biden in 2017.

Former President Barack Obama has had enough with the poppycock and balderdash … and Republicans as well.

On Tuesday night’s episode of “The Late Show,” host Stephen Colbert asked the former president about a certain clash going down within the Democratic party that the late-night host described as “liberals vs. the left.”

“As my children say to me, ‘Dad, you’re a liberal. We’re leftists,’” Colbert began to explain. “Because, they’re like, ‘Liberals are people who think things should basically stay the same, you know what I mean? And the next generation really wants things to change.’”

Colbert then asked Obama how he thinks the Democratic party could “actually achieve change.”

Advertisement

Obama responded by noting that the two were currently sitting in his nearly completed Barack Obama Presidential Center in Chicago, which the former president stressed was “nonpartisan.”

“The reason why I want to mention that is because I’m worried about the Republican party, not just the Democratic party,” Obama said.

“When I was president, people would ask me, ‘What changes would you like to see in Washington?’ I’d say, ‘I’d love a loyal opposition.’ I’d love a Republican party that was conservative in some ways — that didn’t agree with me on a whole bunch of stuff — but believed in the rule of law, and judicial independence, and … empirical evidence, science, and wasn’t constantly tapping into our worst impulses.”

The late Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) receives the 2017 Liberty Medal from former Vice President Joe Biden in 2017.
The late Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) receives the 2017 Liberty Medal from former Vice President Joe Biden in 2017.

William Thomas Cain via Getty Images

Obama said there “has been a Republican party like that in the past” and thinks it would be wise for the GOP to embrace its less extreme roots because America needs “to have two healthy parties.”

Advertisement

As for Democrats, Obama wasn’t exactly buying the idea there is some “so-called rift between the left and liberals.”

He noted that most Democrats, “independents and even some Republicans” share overlapping beliefs, like “equality, fairness;” that all Americans “should be able to make a living wage” and “be able to support a family and retire;” and that companies should not be allowed “to just run roughshod over the rights of workers.”

Democrat’s real problem, as Obama sees it, is their terrible communication style.

“What I’m more interested in Democrats is, do you know how to talk to regular people like we are not at a college seminar? Can you talk plain English to folks?”

Advertisement

Obama said the left should take notes from New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who Obama called “an extraordinary talent,” thanks to his ability to pinpoint a specific issue and explain it in everyday language.

“Not only does he talk like a normal person, but he lives a normal life,” Colbert said. “He names what is obviously wrong, and he goes, ‘We should change that thing.’”

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani speaks during a campaign rally in 2025.
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani speaks during a campaign rally in 2025.

ANGELA WEISS via Getty Images

“Yes!” Obama enthusiastically said, adding: “And not have a bunch of gobbledygook around it.”

Advertisement

Colbert was clearly tickled by Obama using the word “gobbledygook,” and suggested Obama etch the word somewhere in his new presidential library.

“The building is not completed, I think I’m going to put that somewhere,” an amused Obama joked. “I’m going to carve it into some of the granite out here: ‘No gobbledygook, just talk like normal people talk!’ You know? Like, the rent’s too high, we need to make the rent lower for people.”

Elsewhere in his lengthy interview with Colbert, Obama also managed to slyly call out President Donald Trump without even using his name. Check out that bit of the conversation here.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump’s New ICE Logo Gets A Not-So-‘NICE’ Reception Online

Published

on

Trump’s New ICE Logo Gets A Not-So-'NICE' Reception Online

Donald Trump shared on his Truth Social platform Tuesday what appeared to be a mock logo for “National Immigration & Customs Enforcement” — or “NICE” — the trolling nickname he has recently used for US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The logo features a bald eagle with its wings spread wide in gold, black and white tones. It clutches an olive branch in one talon and arrows in the other, with a stars-and-stripes shield across its chest, over the acronym and agency name.

The Department of Homeland Security later shared Trump’s post on X.

The White House account then amplified the post with a second image showing what appeared to be an embroidered-style patch version of the logo.

Advertisement

Critics from across the political spectrum slammed the post on X:

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Saturday Night Live UK Boss Addresses Season 2 Speculation

Published

on

Saturday Night Live UK Boss Addresses Season 2 Speculation

With just two more weeks left on the inaugural run of Saturday Night Live UK, speculation is now mounting about whether another season could be on the cards.

After premiering in March, the UK edition of SNL got off to a flying start, with strong ratings for an original Sky show and a positive reaction from viewers and critics.

Now the end of the season is in sight, lead producer James Longman has spoken to IndieWire about whether another is in the pipeline.

“Definitely not for sure,” he responded, cryptically. “But I stay away from these discussions, I’m just trying to make a funny show.”

Advertisement

It’s the classic British angle, essentially, we thought it was going to be shit and it’s actually alright,” Longman quipped, noting that this is something he considers a compliment.

SNL UK continues on Saturday night at 10pm on Sky and Now.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer Pleads For ‘Total Transparency’ From Civil Servants

Published

on

Starmer Pleads For 'Total Transparency' From Civil Servants

Keir Starmer has attempted to rebuild trust with Whitehall by sending civil servants in an email the night before polling stations opened.

The prime minister admitted “the events of the last recent weeks have felt unsettling”, alluding to his controversial decision to sack the top civil servant in the Foreign Office.

Starmer blamed Olly Robbins for giving Peter Mandelson security clearance so he could become ambassador to the US, even after the disgraced Labour peer failed vetting.

The PM claimed he was not aware security officials had advised against giving Mandelson a clean bill of health and blamed Robbins for keeping it secret.

Advertisement

But, in a box-office appearance before MPs, Robbins insisted the vetting process is independent of ministers and the details are not typically shared.

Clearly trying to extend an olive branch in the letter, Starmer told Whitehall officials their work is the “backbone of this country”, and that “we are one team”.

But, while writing to the half a million civil servants in the UK, the PM called on them to offer “total transparency” to ministers.

He said: “I value the ‘speaking truth to power’ that is the hallmark of our system.

Advertisement

“I want a culture where information flows freely, where risks are flagged early, and where we work together to solve problems before they become crises.

“The relationship between a minister and their officials relies on a bedrock of total transparency.

“Without that trust, the partnership that sits at the heart of our constitution cannot function. We are fixing the processes that have failed, but we are not changing the fundamental value we place on your role.”

His email went out hours before polls opened on Thursday.

Advertisement

More than 100 local councils are up for election in England, while voters in Scotland and Wales will also go to the polls for elections to Holyrood and the Senedd.

Labour are expected to fare particularly badly, as pollsters agree the central government will likely be punished for a gruelling 22 months in office.

Starmer has had a rocky relationship with Whitehall since winning the 2024 general election.

He previously shocked officials by accusing them of being “comfortable in the tepid bath of managed decline”.

Advertisement

He later claimed he meant that the problem was not with officials themselves but that they faced “too many obstacles”.

Starmer’s pick as cabinet secretary – Chris Wormald – was also forced out as head of the civil service earlier this year and replaced by Antonia Romeo who is expected to reform the entire system.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Sydney Sweeney Recalls Filming Euphoria Season 3 Party Scene

Published

on

Sydney Sweeney Recalls Filming Euphoria Season 3 Party Scene

Sydney Sweeney is lifting the lid on shooting one of Euphoria season three’s most memorable sequences.

In the most recent episode of the divisive drama, Sydney’s character Cassie was seen embracing a different sort of lifestyle afforded to her by her new OnlyFans career, including a lavish influencer party.

While this party eventually descended into more of the extreme scenes that has seen Euphoria’s third iteration prove divisive among viewers, the Emmy nominee has made it clear that she had a blast filming the episode.

“Maddy transforms Cassie back into Cassie’s most glorious self, and she takes it from there,” she explained in a behind-the-scenes video posted on HBO’s YouTube page.

Advertisement

“There is nothing like a Euphoria party. Every season, Sam [Levinson, Euphoria’s creator] always writes in one.”

Admitting that she uses these scenes to live vicariously through her character, Sydney continued: “I don’t really go to parties, so this is my time where I get to have fun through Cassie. And she lets loose! This girl knows how to party, she’s having the time of her life.”

Interspersed with shots of Sydney and hundreds of extras partying, she added: “I was like, ‘are we ever going to call cut?’. I didn’t know what to do! I don’t know how to dance. I thought my wig was going to fly off, I’m whipping my hair all over the place. It was crazy.”

Advertisement

Over the last few weeks, Cassie’s Euphoria storyline has continued to raise eyebrows, with many critics describing some of Sydney’s scenes as “degrading”, “horrible” and comparable to a “humiliation ritual” for the actor.

Sam Levinson said earlier this week: “What’s interesting is if you push it a little bit, [Sydney] becomes brilliant. You just do a few more takes, and she can reach these levels that are very honest emotionally, but also deeply funny.”

He added: “She’s able to anchor the scene with this kind of madness and chaos going on around her.”

Euphoria airs weekly on Sky and Now in the UK.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Jane Fonda Says Being Married To The Late Ted Turner Was ‘Complicated’

Published

on

Jane Fonda looked back at her "challenging" relationship with media mogul Ted Turner following news of his death on Wednesday

Jane Fonda has shared her thoughts on her “complicated” marriage to media mogul Ted Turner in an exceptionally earnest tribute following the news of his death at the age of 87.

Offering her “immediate thoughts about Ted” in a Wednesday afternoon Instagram post, the Hollywood veteran and lifelong activist looked back on their relationship as “challenging”, while adding that she had “always been up for a challenge, and with Ted it was almost always worth it”.

“He swept into my life, a gloriously handsome, deeply romantic, swashbuckling pirate and I’ve never been the same,” she said of Turner, who was her husband from 1991 until their divorce in 2001.

Explaining how it felt for the multifaceted billionaire to need her love, Fonda wrote: “No one had ever let me know they needed me, and this wasn’t your average human being that needed me, this was the creator of CNN, and Turner Classic Movies, who had won the America’s Cup as the world’s greatest sailor.

Advertisement

“He had a big life, a brilliant mind and a soaring sense of humour.”

Jane Fonda looked back at her "challenging" relationship with media mogul Ted Turner following news of his death on Wednesday
Jane Fonda looked back at her “challenging” relationship with media mogul Ted Turner following news of his death on Wednesday

Jean-Pierre REY via Getty Images

She also acknowledged his ability to care for her, writing: “To be needed and cared for simultaneously is transformative.”

“Ted Turner helped me believe in myself. He gave me confidence. I think I did the same for him, but that’s what women are raised to do,” the Oscar winner went on to say, calling Turner’s ability to be vulnerable one of his “greatest strengths”.

Fonda said she learned more from Turner than “more than any other person or school classes” could teach before remarking how he was the “most competitive person” she had ever met – besides storied actor Katharine Hepburn – and how “fascinating” that was “to witness”.

Advertisement

“Whether it was who’d made the most ski runs at the end of the day, to acres of land owned (stewarded is the more fitting word for his relationship to land), who had the most billions, how many countries he’d made love to his prior lover in and could I match that, it was challenging,” she said.

Continuing her lengthy homage in the comments, the Barbarella star said: “I loved Ted with all my heart.”

Jane Fonda and Ted Turner kiss during the actor's 2006 roast. Married from 1991 to 2001, she called him her "favorite ex-husband" less than a week before his death.
Jane Fonda and Ted Turner kiss during the actor’s 2006 roast. Married from 1991 to 2001, she called him her “favorite ex-husband” less than a week before his death.

Ben Rose via Getty Images

“I see him in heaven now with all the wildlife he helped bring back from extinction,” Fonda went on. “

The black footed ferrets, the prairie dogs, Big Horned sheep, Mexican Gray Wolf, the Yellowstone wolf pack, bison, the red cockaded woodpecker and so many more, they’re all gathered at the pearly gates applauding and thanking him for saving their species.”

Advertisement

Addressing the five offspring that now survive Turner, she called them, “five talented, complex kids who I had the privilege of becoming stepmother to”.

“I love them to this day,” she went on. “If it was complicated to be married to him, think how complicated it was being his child. And they are all doing fine.”

“Rest in Peace, dearest Ted,” her message ended. “You are loved and you will be remembered.”

Though the couple split in 2001, they remained friends after.

Advertisement

Less than a week before his death, Fonda had called the television trailblazer her “favourite ex-husband” during the opening of this year’s TCM Classic Film Festival in Hollywood, adding that founding the festival’s namesake network, Turner Classic Movies, is just one of the “great things that he did”.

Turner will also be remembered as the creator of CNN, the world’s first 24-hour cable news channel, as well as WTBS and TNT.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Graham Norton’s The Neighbourhood Bumped From Its Primetime Slot

Published

on

Graham Norton cosies up to a gnome on the set of his new series The Neighbourhood

Graham Norton’s reality show The Neighbourhood has been pulled from its primetime TV slot just weeks after its big launch.

According to this week’s ITV schedule, The Neighbourhood has been bumped from its regular 9pm slot on Thursdays and Fridays back to 10.45 pm, in a huge blow for the struggling series.

The competition show sees real-life friends and families move into a community to compete against each other for a life-changing amount of money.

In Thursday’s schedule, it’s been replaced by an old episode of Davina McCall‘s Long Lost Family, which originally aired two years ago.

Advertisement

On Friday, meanwhile, the 9pm slot is now occupied by an episode of Beat The Chasers, which was first shown in 2021.

An ITV rep told The Sun: “The full box set of The Neighbourhood is now available to stream on ITVX. Additionally, the show will continue to air in an evening slot on ITV.”

Graham Norton cosies up to a gnome on the set of his new series The Neighbourhood
Graham Norton cosies up to a gnome on the set of his new series The Neighbourhood

Despite its starry presenter, a huge promotional push by ITV and prime-time slot, The Neighbour was met with poor reviews when it premiered towards the end of April, and had reportedly only pulled in 500k viewers by its third episode.

This follows a trend of poor ratings for recent ITV shows they hoped would rival the success of The Traitors, with Genius Game and The Fortune Hotel also suffering from disappointing viewing figures, and both having since been cancelled by the channel.

Despite its poor performance, Graham had previously spoken enthusiastically about The Neighbourhood, insisting: “It leans into our curiosity about what’s behind closed doors and there’s something really compelling and addictive about seeing the way the existing households interact with each other.

Advertisement

“I thought, ‘I’d watch that’ – and I’d never want to work on something I wouldn’t watch. I thought, ‘this show would hook me!’.”

The Neighbourhood continues at 10.45pm on Thursday and Friday on ITV1, with the full series available to stream on ITVX now.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

It Turns Out David Attenborough Is The Reason Tennis Balls Are Yellow

Published

on

It Turns Out David Attenborough Is The Reason Tennis Balls Are Yellow

Just when you think you’ve got it all figured out – a fact comes along that changes everything for you. It blows your mind completely.

First, came the news that in most cases, it doesn’t matter too much whether you choose white or brown rice. And now, in another bit of chromatic trivia, it turns out that tennis balls used to be black or white until the ’70s (and Wimbledon held out until 1986).

Their colour was dictated by the colour of the court (a light ball for a dark court and vice versa, so spectators can see it).

’Twas ever thus ― until a certain David Attenborough came along.

Advertisement

What? Why?

The Planet Earth presenter started working at the BBC in 1952 (having only watched one TV show).

In an article with RadioTimes, David revealed that he was responsible for bringing colour to BBC2 for the first time in 1968. And he decided to focus on Wimbledon for the crowning episode of the transformation.

“We had been asking the government over and over again and they wouldn’t allow us, until suddenly they said, ‘Yes, OK, you can have [the colour TV technology], and what’s more you’re going to have it in nine months’ time,’ or whatever it was,” he told RadioTimes.

Advertisement

He added that he wanted to beat West Germany to full-colour broadcast ― the US and Japan had already done it by that time.

But, according to the book 2,024 QI Facts To Stop You In Your Tracks, at some point, David Attenborough noticed that the tennis balls weren’t vibrant and visible enough on screen.

So, in 1972, the International Tennis Federation made optic yellow tennis balls ― side note, they’re officially optic yellow and not green (though in my mind, they’re definitely lime).

Who knew a simple ball could have so much lore?

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Islamic sectarianism is warping democracy

Published

on

Islamic sectarianism is warping democracy

Even before a single ballot has been counted, Islamic sectarianism has already emerged as one of the defining stories of these English local elections. Significant proportions of Muslim voters are expected to swing towards Green or Muslim independent candidates, and away from a Labour Party that could once depend on their vote. A new report by spiked columnist Rakib Ehsan for the Policy Exchange think-tank explains why.

‘Understanding Islamopopulism’ looks at the distance between Muslim voters and the British mainstream, and what this might mean for British democracy. Policy Exchange commissioned pollsters JL Partners to survey the views of more than 1,000 British Muslims. And the results are stark. According to the polling, the most important concern for Muslim voters is not the economy, education, housing or healthcare, but Gaza. The poll also found that 63 per cent – nearly two-thirds – prioritise their Muslim identity over their British identity.

This has been something of an open secret in British politics for some time. And although the left furiously denies this is the case, the Green Party and Muslim independent candidates have made major gains by presenting themselves as the vehicles for Muslim interests. Most notoriously, in February this year, the Greens’ Hannah Spencer triumphed in the Gorton and Denton by-election on the back of an unashamedly sectarian campaign. Campaign leaflets and videos were produced in Urdu (the national language of Pakistan), warning of Reform UK’s ‘Islamophobia’ and painting the Labour government as overly supportive of Israel.

Advertisement

The report also found shockingly high levels of anti-Semitism. The Muslims surveyed were more than twice as likely as the average Briton to believe that Jews have ‘too much power’ over banking, parliament, the media, the legal system and the entertainment industry. A quarter of respondents also had a ‘favourable’ view of Hamas – a proscribed terrorist organisation in the UK, and a group committed to the violent destruction of Israel and the expulsion of Jews from the Middle East.

Given this hostility towards Jews, it is hardly a surprise that the Greens – having established themselves as the new face of the Islamo-left alliance – are now attracting so many anti-Semites. Just last week, two candidates were arrested on suspicion of stirring up racial hatred against Jews. Just as disturbing is that, if recent polling is anything to go by, the anti-Semitism scandals swirling around the Greens have not made much of a dent in their electoral prospects.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

Other cultural attitudes uncovered by the report are just as alarming. Polling found that a majority of British Muslims are in favour of criminalising depictions of the Prophet Muhammad and the desecration of the Koran. In an age when hostile mobs have forced schoolteachers into hiding for showing a cartoon of Muhammad, and when the authorities are already arresting dissidents for burning the Koran, these are not academic questions.

The consequences of ‘Islamopopulism’ will be profound. Already, we are witnessing the strange spectacle of a Middle Eastern conflict taking centre stage in local elections that, until recently, had far more to do with potholes than Palestine. Where prospective councillors might once have sought the support of their communities by promising cleaner streets or more frequent buses, they now promise to be the ‘voice’ of Gaza and to sever whatever (minimal or non-existent) ties their area has with Israel.

Advertisement

Should they persist until the next General Election and beyond, the forces of sectarianism will be even more damaging to British democracy. It isn’t clear how parliament can be expected to act in the interests of Britons as a whole if an increasing number of representatives are elected solely to advance the concerns of one religious group.

It should go without saying that most British Muslims are proud and productive members of society. And as the report confirms, most are not anti-Semites and do not support Islamist terrorism. But the rise of Islamic identity politics seems almost guaranteed to drown out those voices who are closest to the British mainstream. Unless it is defeated, the new sectarianism could prove poisonous to society and democracy.

Hugo Timms is a staff writer at spiked.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025