Politics
Could Labour be about to ban X?
Lisa Nandy announced last week that she is leaving X. That’s right, the UK culture secretary is leaving one of the biggest communications spaces there is – one that directly and indirectly shapes the culture she is meant to be engaged with.
She has justified her departure – and that of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), too – on the grounds that the platform is now rife with ‘misinformation’, and that it ‘isn’t healthy for our democracy’.
Nandy’s gripes against X are hardly unusual among our political and media class. Other senior Labour figures have also launched broadsides against X recently. London mayor Sadiq Khan has repeatedly attacked X for spreading ‘misinformation’ about the state of London, welcomed an Ofcom investigation into sexualised images on the platform and accused X owner Elon Musk of misunderstanding free speech. And just this weekend, Labour deputy leader Lucy Powell described X as ‘toxic’ and called for the introduction of so-called purdah rules on the platform during elections.
Indeed, there may come a day when the government moves to ban X outright. I don’t mean more regulation, or another Ofcom code of practice. I mean a straight-up ban. Should that happen, it would put Britain in the same category of state censorship as North Korea, China, Russia, Turkmenistan, Myanmar, Venezuela and Iran.
NGOs have backed Labour in its anti-X crusade. Amnesty International has claimed that if Nandy genuinely believes X is unhealthy for our democracy, she ‘should take more decisive action – not just leave the platform’. It is effectively calling for new legislation to force X into line. Funny, that, coming from a charity whose entire purpose is supposedly to defend people’s freedoms – including freedom of speech.
Keir Starmer’s government even suggested earlier this year that it would not rule out ending its use of X if the platform did not act on concerns about its AI chatbot generating non-consensual sexualised images of users. This was a genuine issue, and one the platform did act swiftly on, but it was difficult to avoid the conclusion that the UK government has it in for X – that, as Musk once put it, it wants ‘any excuse for censorship’.
Why does the political establishment hate X so much? The simple answer is because it is much freer than its rivals. It allows people to express dissenting or heterodox views in a way that other platforms don’t. There is no filter.
Pre-Musk X, then known as Twitter, was much more restrictive. Certain views, even news stories, were suppressed if they didn’t accord with the dominant consensus. Some users were kicked off the platform, or ‘shadow banned’, for their opinions on everything from gender identity to the origins of Covid.
But back then, nobody in government called the suppression of alternative views ‘unhealthy’ for our democracy. None of those currently attacking X accused Twitter, despite its censorial behaviour, of failing to foster meaningful debate. That all tells us something – namely, that the current attacks on X are not really about misinformation or democracy. They are fuelled, rather, by the Labour government’s loss of control over the debate. In short, Labour feels as if it is losing its grip on the public conversation, and X is where that grip has slipped furthest.
There is another reason for Labour’s hatred in particular. X is the platform that brought the grooming-gangs scandal back into the open in early 2025, doing great damage to Keir Starmer’s government. Musk effectively forced the political and media establishment to finally reckon with the horrors visited on thousands of young, vulnerable girls over the course of decades – while the social workers, the police and others looked away. He dragged a scandal back into the spotlight that many would have preferred to stay hidden.
Labour and the political class are not just at war with Elon Musk and X. They are also effectively waging a war on free speech. Days after her announcement, Lisa Nandy’s DCMS published a green paper proposing a ‘prominence regime’. This will legally require platforms like X to push content from ‘trusted sources’, like the BBC and other legacy media outlets, at the expense of other journalistic sources and independent media.
This is bigger than Elon, or Nandy’s huffy exit from X. We have a Labour government stating plainly that it intends to intervene directly in the content people consume. Its war on X heralds an assault on people’s freedom of speech and of thought.
Ada Akpala is a spiked intern.
Politics
North Dakota leaders talk Trump & Teddy Roosevelt over bison burgers
Politics
Maine Democratic voters are wary about repeating mistakes of 2024
BRUNSWICK, Maine — The effort to push Graham Platner out of the Maine Senate race has some Democrats flashing back to 2024 — and making them worry about abandoning their nominee.
Platner has seen a dramatic drop in support within the party and has lost his biggest financial backers after POLITICO reported that a woman said he forced her to have sex with him, which he denies. Democrats in Maine are already jockeying to replace him on the ballot and take on GOP Sen. Susan Collins — all before Platner has even dropped out of the race.
That series of events, several voters said in interviews, dredged up unwelcome memories of one fateful summer two years ago, when former President Joe Biden ended his reelection bid late, leaving his Vice President Kamala Harris just 107 days to beat Donald Trump. Then, she lost.
Platner should end his bid “only if he does it in time for another good strong candidate to actually hit the ground really running like hell,” Claudia Knox, 85, told POLITICO.
“I do want a fighter. I do want Collins out. So, the question to me is, if he withdraws, what happens? That’s my question,” she added. “Maybe he should hurry up, because this is feeling parallel to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.”
Some Maine voters told POLITICO they’re doubtful that another candidate can replicate Platner’s momentum, even as some of them want him to drop out. They’re skeptical of what the process to replace him would even look like and worried whether Democrats have enough time to both pick a new nominee and unseat Collins.
Linda, a 79-year-old Brunswick resident who declined to share her last name, said that it was time for Platner to end his campaign. But she’s worried Democrats now face potentially insurmountable odds to defeat Collins with just four months left before the general election.
“It’s going to be tough, tough, tough. It’s going to be very tough,” she said. “I think [Democrats] have a reasonable slate of people to work with. … They can’t just go blue sky now. I mean, they’ve got to focus.”
If Platner withdraws by Monday, the Maine Democratic Party has until July 27 to name his replacement. Some officials have already begun maneuvering to identify who can step in and are considering the unsuccessful candidates for governor in this year’s primary — Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, former public health official Nirav Shah and former Maine Senate President Troy Jackson — as well as state Rep. Valli Geiger and brewery owner Dan Kleban, who briefly launched his own Senate campaign last year.
Harris’ experience shows the difficulty for a candidate to step in late in the process and rebuild Democrats’ ticket-topping campaign. Platner’s replacement will have a short runway to reintroduce themself to voters and broadcast their policy priorities — all while continually having to distance their campaign from the oysterman and his string of controversies.
But the two situations are not entirely analogous. None of the candidates have shared a ticket with Platner, and all have forcefully denounced him. Harris, on the other hand, had to contend with the four years she served alongside Biden, as his presidency grew increasingly unpopular.
Biden and Harris spokespeople did not respond to requests for comment.
Those differences haven’t calmed some Maine voters’ early concerns at this nascent stage in the process, though.
“We are just leery about a new kind of Kamala Harris situation, where we don’t get to choose whatever Democratic candidate will be on the ticket,” said Stephanie Gardner, 38, as she removed her Graham Platner campaign sign from her yard in Topsham on Tuesday morning.
Gardner said she believes it’s time for Platner to step aside and wants Jackson to step up in his stead. Jackson, who touted endorsements from Platner and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in his unsuccessful run for governor, has already filed paperwork exploring a run.
Rose Heithoff, 35, said that she might prefer a process in which party leaders help winnow the field to avoid a full intraparty war, but acknowledged that didn’t solve Democrats’ problems in 2024: “If you look back at the Biden-Harris situation, that was a fumble in some ways because I think people felt like they didn’t necessarily have the choice,” she said.
The Maine Democratic Party has promised an open process and that it will reveal details as soon as Platner withdraws from the race. In a fiery Tuesday evening post on social media, Maine Democratic Party Executive Director Devon Murphy-Anderson also slammed Platner’s team for reaching out to party officials to “put their thumb on the scale of what this process looks like.”
But for now, it’s unclear whether there will be any public debates and campaigning, or how much voters will have a say.
Platner said on social media within minutes of POLITICO’s report publishing Monday that he was “taking the time to reflect on the best path forward.” By Tuesday, he had cancelled fundraisers, pulled down ads, and lost support from his biggest backers, including Sanders. The powerful national Democratic campaign arm and outside groups who’ve helped fund Platner’s bid said they would focus their resources elsewhere.
Even so, some voters don’t want to see Platner go at all, worried about the consequences for the race.
On Monday, outside the site of a cancelled town hall in Gorham where Platner was scheduled to field questions from voters, Kirk Little, 78, said “the Democratic Party disqualifies people too soon” and he is sticking with Platner — for now.
POLITICO had published Racicot’s allegations just an hour before the event was supposed to begin, and Little had heard of it from a radio broadcast in his car.
“If it’s true, is it disqualifying historically? Yes. But since Trump, stuff like this that we used to think of as historically disqualifying isn’t,” he said. “I’ll still vote for the guy.”
About 30 miles away in Sanford, just north of the Maine-New Hampshire border, a group of about 10 Maine voters gathered in the parking lot of a veterans community center where Platner was set to appear after his town hall in Gorham. Once it became clear that he would not show, the would-be attendees started commiserating over the canceled event and the day’s news.
Rob Brandow, 41, of nearby Waterboro, leaned against the wooden fence surrounding the building and quietly followed the conversation from a few feet away. “It’s a tough one,” he told POLITICO of the allegations. “The honest answer is, I actually don’t care.”
“I think it’s possible philosophically to walk that line where I say, like, ‘Yes, those things are bad, it shouldn’t happen, and those allegations should be given appropriate due process to see the light of day,’” he said. “And simultaneously Susan Collins should not be re-elected.”
Jessica Piper contributed reporting.
Politics
Big Burnham will be watching you
Andy Burnham has promised that ‘the north’ will be his lodestar when he takes the reins of power. Yet it seems the incoming regime could be drawing inspiration not from the north of England, but from North Korea. A raft of new measures clamping down on our online activity, proposed by the outgoing Starmer administration – from restrictions on VPNs (virtual-private networks) to enforcing so-called purdah rules during elections – have reportedly gained Burnham’s backing, bringing Britain’s approach to the internet in line with some of the least liberal and democratic countries on the planet.
Team Burnham confirmed earlier this week that Keir Starmer’s proposed ban on under-16s using social media will go ahead. And crucially, to enforce these age restrictions, the use of VPNs is likely to be heavily curtailed if not banned outright – for children and adults alike.
Essentially, VPNs allow users to disguise their location and their device’s IP address, making it possible to circumvent national restrictions. Their use has surged since July 2025, when the Online Safety Act began blocking age-inappropriate social-media content – and they have been in the Labour government’s sights ever since. Tech secretary Liz Kendall has promised an announcement on VPNs will come this month. A ban would bring Burnham’s Britain in line with totalitarian states like China, Russia, Iran, North Korea and Belarus.
And the crackdown won’t end there. Shortly after flouncing off X, culture secretary Lisa Nandy unveiled a green paper with plans to compel social-media channels and video-sharing platforms to prioritise what it calls ‘trusted’ content creators. In the name of tackling so-called mis- or disinformation, videos from the BBC and other public-service broadcasters will be given additional prominence on our news feeds, while content from independent creators will be artificially suppressed.
It’s not hard to guess what the government is up to here. After all, the BBC and mainstream media have broadcast their own fair share of actual misinformation – pushing elite orthodoxy on everything from trans to Palestine, even when it conflicts with the truth. Still, in Labour’s eyes at least, the Beeb can at least be trusted not to ask too many difficult questions about the issues that most animate the public – from rape gangs to small boats. Labour wants to replace the rough-and-tumble of the free internet – with its range of noisy, rabble-rousing dissenting voices – with a safe space where only state-approved opinions can dominate the discourse. And as if that were not Orwellian enough, Labour’s consultation on the ‘prominence’ regime does not allow respondents to say they are opposed to the state dictating what appears on our social feeds.
Perhaps the maddest proposal yet has come from Labour’s Lucy Powell, a Burnham ally who is expected to be promoted to deputy PM. Powell has suggested amending the Representation of the People Bill that’s currently working its way through the Commons to force social-media firms to follow similar rules to broadcasters during election periods. In other words, they should seek to enforce ‘impartiality and balance’ on their news feeds, even giving due weight to political parties based on their past electoral support. This would entail nothing less than the end of social media as a space for the free expression of public opinion – and during election time, no less. It would require a staggering amount of censorship and state oversight over what we post online and what posts we’re allowed to read, just as we’re making up our minds about who governs us.
As alarming and authoritarian as these proposals may be, none of them should surprise us. The Labour government’s all-out assault on free speech has turned the UK into an international embarrassment. Thirty people are arrested every day in England and Wales for posts on social media deemed ‘grossly offensive’ by police – that’s 12,000 arrests per year, more than America was arresting at the height of the first Red Scare. The Online Safety Act – passed under the Tories, but implemented and beefed up by Labour – means that vast swathes of the internet are now blocked to Britons who haven’t verified their age. This includes social-media posts about gender ideology and asylum hotels, a speech in parliament about the rape gangs, and a piss-takey article about the plummeting popularity of the Christian name ‘Keir’. Our right to blaspheme against Islam – or even criticise the most extreme manifestations of Islamist ideology – has also been constrained by Labour’s new Islamophobia rules. Not since the Crown licensing of the press was abolished in 1695 have we had a government so determined to keep a lid on dissent.
Burnham has now all but confirmed that a change of Labour leader will not mean a change of direction when it comes to our right to speak freely. We will continue careening down the slippery slope towards ever more insidious forms of authoritarianism. In the name of child protection and fighting misinformation, we could soon be living under speech restrictions that would make a tinpot dictator blush.
Be in no doubt, Big Burnham will be watching you.
Fraser Myers is deputy editor at spiked and host of the spiked podcast. Follow him on X: @FraserMyers.
Politics
Politics Home Article | Labour and Tories Refuse To Stand Candidates In Clacton By-Election

Nigel Farage resigns as the MP for Clacton, triggering a by-election. (Alamy)
2 min read
Labour, the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats all say they they will not stand candidates against Nigel Farage in Clacton by-election.
Farage has triggered a by-election in Clacton after resigning as MP in what he said would be “a people versus the establishment” contest.
The Reform leader is under investigation by the parliamentary authorities over allegations that he did not correctly report a £5m gift from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne.
He is also facing an investigation over undeclared donations from close friend George Cottrell, who has been convicted of fraud in the US.
On the decision to not stand a candidate in the by-election, a Labour party spokesperson said: “Labour’s ruling body, the National Executive Committee, has decided not to stand a candidate in this circus.
Instead, Labour will remain focused on delivering for working people and holding Reform to account. Farage should let the parliamentary investigation into his finances run its course and face the consequences.”
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch also confirmed that her party will not stand a candidate in the by-election.
“We will be standing a candidate in the real by-election, which will follow the standards investigation into Nigel Farage’s fishy finances. We will not be standing a candidate in the fake by-election that Farage is causing to distract people from what is happening.
The best thing for him to have done would have been to call a press conference and explain what he did with the money, apologise if needs be, and that would have been the end of it. Instead, he has been running away from scrutiny. No one is bigger than parliament. We all have to register our interests.
We, the Conservative Party, are very focused on uniting the country around sensible policies.”
The Liberal Democrats have also said they will not stand a candidate in the by-election. Party leader Ed Davey said: “If this by-election does go ahead now, we are calling on all parties to stand aside and refuse to give oxygen to Farage’s vanity project.”
Davey also went further in calling on the government to block the election until the parliamentary standard’s commissioner has finished his investigation.
“The people of Clacton should have all the facts before they cast their votes.”
Politics
Prince Harry’s loss is a victory for free speech
Prince Harry is having a bad week, and it is impossible not to be delighted. First, he learnt that taxpayers would not be footing the security bill for his family’s trip to the UK. Then he was refused a last-minute request for a room at Buckingham Palace. And now, best of all, in a rare victory for press freedom, the Duke of Sussex has lost his long-running legal case against the Daily Mail. I make that 3-0 to us commoners.
The High Court’s dismissal of all the claims that Harry and his posh pals brought against Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Daily Mail, is worth celebrating. The judge in the case ruled that neither the prince nor Elton John, Liz Hurley, nor any of the other censorious celebs who accused journalists of phone hacking and blagging private medical records, could prove their claims. In fact, Mr Justice Nicklin told the claimants, just because information published about them was private did not mean that it ‘must have been unlawfully sourced’. Harry’s loss is a win for the journalists who were dragged into court and had their lives turned upside down by false allegations. And it is a victory for everyone who wants a free press rather than a media devoted to sycophantic propaganda.
In truth, the outcome of this case should never have been in doubt. The ginger whinger’s evidence never stood up to scrutiny. Sadie Frost may have given the performance of her life, summoning up tears in the witness box, but it turns out that legal cases are still won on the basis of facts rather than emotions. Yet time and again, Harry showed he’s not capable of recognising ‘the truth’ when it smacks him in the face.
Those he was close to would never leak stories about him, the prince told the court, even though he had previously accused friends of doing exactly that – and text messages showed he knew that this was happening. Harry also claimed he had cut off all contact with a woman when he found out she was a journalist, despite Facebook messages revealing this was absolutely not the case. He would not share information about his love life with strangers, he insisted, only for this to be disproved by his own tell-all, 400-page autobiography.
A sympathetic explanation might be that, despite receiving the best education money can buy, Harry is simply not that bright. But there’s more to these ‘untruths’ and contradictions than mere lapses of memory. Harry’s courtroom testimony, and the fact that the legal case burnt through an estimated £50million on lawyers’ fees, suggest the Duke of Montecito is not merely dumb but has an overinflated sense of his own importance. It’s not that Harry doesn’t know what’s true and what’s not – it is just the truth is far less important than getting his own way. He is self-entitled enough to expect journalists and judges, the legal system and the press to bend to his will.
He may be a spoilt brat, but let’s not forget that Harry was encouraged to engage in this expensive, time-wasting litigation by a coterie of lawyers, luvvies and a former Lib Dem MP associated with Hacked Off, a campaign group founded by Hugh Grant, to curtail press freedom. In delivering today’s ruling, the judge went so far as to brand Hacked Off adviser Dr Evan Harris as ‘dishonest’ for a plan he cooked up to hide the fact that one of the cases put before the court was beyond the statute of limitations. ‘At root, that proposal involved a deception’, the judge declared. Damning indeed.
If things had gone Harry’s way, he would now be celebrating a victory for money, influence and titles. What’s more, he hoped to be doing this from within Buckingham Palace.
Thankfully, his father had already kiboshed that part of the plan. The king, or at the very least a senior royal adviser, seems to have grown sick and tired of Harry’s constant to-ing and fro-ing over which members of his family will be coming to the UK and where they will stay. For the best part of a fortnight, we’ve been treated to a minute-by-minute account of Harry and Meghan’s ever-changing travel plans, revealed – without any hint of irony – by the privacy-loving couple themselves.
The duke and duchess originally proffered a meet-up with Archie and Lilibet, the king’s grandchildren, only to withdraw the offer when it became clear they were not going to get the bells-and-whistles security detail they wanted. Having first accepted, then rejected the offer of rooms at Buckingham Palace, Harry again changed his mind when it dawned on him that the royal surroundings would make a suitable backdrop for what he assumed would be a victory speech. Good on Charles for acting like any sensible parent and turning down the last-minute request and putting a stop to the whole circus.
As Harry heads off to Birmingham for the Invictus Games and in search of the one remaining reporter prepared to offer a positive spin on his endeavours, the rest of us should raise a glass to press freedom and demand the right to read what politicians, royals and celebrities would rather we did not know.
Politics
More than half of Senate Democrats have urged Platner to drop out
More than half of the Senate Democratic caucus has called for Graham Platner to drop out of the Maine Senate race, less than 24 hours after POLITICO reported that a woman the oysterman once dated had accused him of sexual assault.
Platner called the claim “false.”
Most Democrats previously stuck by Platner even as his beleaguered campaign battled scandal after scandal in recent months. By Tuesday, the tide had turned firmly against Platner, with 31 of the Senate’s 47 Democratic senators calling for him to drop out as of early Tuesday afternoon.
The revolt included some top former allies who had previously defied calls to distance themselves from Platner. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said in a statement Tuesday that he had spoken with Platner and “in light of these very serious allegations, I have recommended that he step aside.”
And Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Monday said that there “can be no tolerance for sexual assault,” just months after referring to the progressive outsider as “my kind of man” while stumping for him in April.
The list — according to POLITICO’s tally of every sitting Democratic senator’s social media posts and public statements — also includes some of the party’s top leaders. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), the chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, said in a joint statement that he should withdraw and the DSCC “will not invest in the Maine Senate race if Platner remains on the ballot.”
More than a dozen Democratic senators appeared to have not yet publicly commented on Platner, and did not immediately respond to POLITICO’s request for comment on their stance.
It’s not just senators who are breaking with Platner. The Maine Democratic Party put out a joint statement calling for him to exit the race, and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who shares a number of top advisers with Platner but never endorsed him, also called for him to step down on Tuesday.
Platner has denied the allegations. But he said his campaign is “mindful of the political reality” and “taking the time to reflect on the best path forward for the state that I love” in a video released on social media Monday, shortly after POLITICO published its article.
Platner had not yet reached a final decision on his campaign.
Platner’s campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the calls from senators for him to step aside.
The office of Maine Sen. Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats and will serve with the eventual winner of the 2026 Maine Senate election, said he would not be commenting on Platner, per a longstanding policy not to comment on races involving his colleagues.
Two Democratic senators who had previously endorsed Platner, Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) condemned him and withdrew their endorsements, but did not explicitly call for him to drop out of the race in social media posts. Whitehouse’s office pointed to his Thursday statement when asked if he would demand Platner drop out, while Gallego did not immediately respond to a question on if he believed he should exit the race.
“The allegations against Graham Platner are troubling and deeply serious,” Gallego said on X. “I am rescinding my endorsement.”
Politics
Bernie Sanders says he told Graham Platner to ‘step aside’
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said he told Maine Democrat Graham Platner to end his Senate bid on Tuesday, in the wake of a POLITICO report that a woman who Platner dated said he forced her to have sex with him.
“I have spoken with Graham Platner about the best path forward for Maine. In light of these very serious allegations, I have recommended that he step aside,” Sanders said in a statement.
Platner has denied the allegations.
It’s Sanders’ first public remarks about Platner since the POLITICO report, and it comes after he’s stood beside Platner in the wake of other scandals. Numerous other elected Democrats and officials called on Platner to step down on Monday night.
Politics
Politics Home Article | Has Nigel Farage Won Over The Voters Of Clacton?

9 min read
Nigel Farage has resigned as an MP, triggering a by-election in Clacton in which he says he will stand. How do the locals feel about him after his first stint? Harriet Symonds reports
“We don’t see [Nigel Farage], he doesn’t come here,” say a group of dog walkers on a blustery morning on the seafront in Clacton-on-Sea.
On Tuesday, Farage announced that he would resign as MP for Clacton and trigger a by-election in response to growing pressure over his financial backing. He insisted he has done nothing wrong, and described the by-election as “people versus the establishment”. Over the weekend, The Sunday Times revealed that Farage had failed to declare funding from George Cottrell, a convicted criminal involved in crypto gambling.
After the Reform UK leader was elected MP for Clacton in 2024, accusations that he was rarely present in the constituency became a familiar refrain. Farage has consistently dismissed such claims, arguing that the demands of leading a national political party inevitably limit the time he can spend locally compared with most MPs.
Speaking earlier this year, a spokesman for Farage told PoliticsHome: “There are 78,703 registered voters in Clacton. It would be impossible to meet every single one of them. Nigel’s visits are structured to ensure he visits and helps as many community groups, businesses, charities and constituents as possible.”
He does, however, live nearby. In late 2024, his partner, Laurie Ferrari, purchased a detached property in the area for £885,000. The house sits around seven miles up the road in Frinton-on-Sea — “the posh end,” as one Clacton resident describes it.
Last year, Farage denied accusations that he had avoided £44,000 in stamp duty by placing the property in his partner’s name, insisting she bought it with her own funds.
In Spring this year, PoliticsHome visited the constituency, where the MP’s absence was felt by several Clacton residents who told us they were uncertain whether Farage even held constituency surgeries. Nor, they said, were they sure if he had a constituency office at all.
The constituency office is discreetly located on Clacton seafront. Nearby is XO – Greek, a popular restaurant on the seafront owned by Jason Smedley. The restaurant hosted Farage’s election victory party in 2024, and Farage would drop in roughly once a month to catch up over “breakfast and a coffee”.
“The change has been phenomenal,” Smedley said. “Everyone hated him when he first came in, but now everyone is like ‘I love him’. If he’s in here, people flood in to see him and get a picture.”
He admitted he was initially reluctant to host events for Farage but now allowed the local Reform branch to hold meetings there as well.
Sources said that Reform did not want any branding outside the constituency office when it was set up. “At one point I had a big poster which I put in the door, which had got the Reform logo on it – that was taken away. They don’t really want it to be seen.”
Reform said the office location was kept a secret for security reasons. In 2024, Farage himself cited safety concerns when explaining why he did not hold open public meetings with constituents.
“Do I have an office in Clacton? Yes. Am I allowing the public to flow through the door with their knives in their pockets? No, no I’m not.”
Local government sources said the Reform leader did not hold traditional in-person surgeries, though they had heard of “invitation-only” meetings — including sessions with local business owners.
“Nigel has held surgeries online”, his spokesperson said.
Farage’s social media showed he had visited a handful of local businesses in the constituency since 2024. The business surgeries held with the editor of the Clacton Gazette were also advertised on social media, the local newspaper and community groups online.
Unusually, when PoliticsHome visited his constituency in the Spring, Farage had the lowest total staff spend of all seven Reform MPs of £150,834.40. Farage has repeatedly insisted that his “personal MP expenses” are null.
According to the official staff register, Farage employed five staff to handle his parliamentary and constituency work. Sources familiar with the set-up said Farage’s parliamentary team in London handled his constituency casework, but there was one full-time caseworker based full-time in the constituency.
“Most of it is done by letter and email to be honest,” they said.
Still, some residents said accessing the MP remained difficult.
A local councillor told PoliticsHome they had occasionally taken on casework on Farage’s behalf. “People in my ward have brought issues to me because they’ve not been able to contact the MP,” they said.
“I wouldn’t know where to contact Nigel Farage,” said Vanessa, who had lived in Clacton for six years and had regular contact with the previous MP, Giles Watling.
Watling himself said constituents still occasionally approached him with problems. “People do feel slightly abandoned,” he said. “If it’s being managed at all, it’s being managed at arm’s length.”
Clacton itself presents the familiar paradox of England’s struggling coastal towns: picturesque seafronts and chronic economic malaise. Once a bustling holiday resort, the town now faces entrenched deprivation, high economic inactivity and a declining high street.
Official figures show that parts of nearby Jaywick — within Farage’s constituency — have been ranked the most deprived neighbourhood in England for four consecutive deprivation indices since 2010.
Economic activity in the wider Clacton constituency is significantly below the national average: roughly 60 per cent of working-age adults are economically active, compared with around 78 per cent across the UK.
The constituency is also unusually old. Nearly a third of residents are aged over 65, giving the area one of the oldest demographic profiles in England. Younger people often leave for work elsewhere, while retirees move in from London and the Home Counties.
These conditions have made it unusually receptive to anti-establishment politics. In 2014 the constituency elected Britain’s first UKIP MP when Douglas Carswell defected from the Conservatives and won the resulting by-election. Two years later nearly 72 per cent of voters backed Brexit.
Earlier this year, PoliticsHome did not have to walk far through the town to spot a Union Jack or St George’s flag cable-tied to a lamppost.
“The town looks more scruffy since he’s been an MP”, remarked Vanessa, who moved to Clacton six years ago. “Since [Farage] has been around here, you’re getting more shops being vacant”.
“My daughter is thinking of closing her shop now – she only phoned me yesterday to say I’m thinking of giving it up,” said Janet, another Clacton resident.
Along the high street, empty shopfronts sit beside amusement arcades and fast-food outlets. The town’s landmark pier — refurbished in recent years — remains one of the few clear signs of investment.
“It was on its way there anyway – but I thought [Farage] coming here would have livened it up”, added another resident.
Rachel Goldsmith, who runs the Old Market Café on the high street, said small businesses were struggling to stay afloat.
“It’s a struggle because everything has doubled,” she says. “I counted the other day, and there’s about 13 empty shops here.”
“Our main post office closed down — it’s now flats.”
Some locals complained that the only new businesses opening are nail bars and barber shops — an issue Reform UK has itself highlighted, claiming many such premises are fronts for money laundering and organised crime.
Farage was also known to frequent The Three Jays pub in Jaywick, described by locals as “his favourite pub”, a short drive from Clacton town centre.
“He’s always in the Three Jays having a drink,” chuckles one constituent.
Inside the pub, GB News played on the main television. Above the bar hangs a sign that reads: “Let’s keep the dumbfuckery to a minimum today.”
Union Jack flags hang in the windows, and the building itself is painted in a shade locals jokingly describe as “Reform blue”.
“That’s no coincidence,” said Rob, a regular who moved to Clacton more than 30 years ago and says he has watched the town steadily deteriorate.
Among the pub’s regulars there was little hesitation in expressing support for Farage. Immigration, empty high streets and a sense of national decline dominate conversation. Many saw the Reform leader as one of the few politicians willing to articulate their frustrations.
Yet some pointed out that the town’s current regeneration projects — including government-funded schemes intended to revive struggling high streets — have little to do with their MP.
The town has been earmarked for £20m through the government’s “Pride of Place” regeneration funding programme, designed to support a ten-year redevelopment strategy.
A Clacton Town Board was established to oversee the initiative. But Farage — who sits on the board — has not attended any meetings since its creation, according to records, occasionally sending a staff member (George Ivil) in his place.
A spokesperson for Farage said: “Nigel has had a private briefing about the town board from council chief executive Ian Davidson, Council leader Mark Stephenson and the chair of the Clacton town board George Kieffer. He is well briefed on everything that is happening and fully supportive of the Love Clacton campaign.”
However, the complaints about abandonment were a common refrain. “The only time you ever sort of see him is if there’s a photo opportunity,” added another local resident.
Speaking back in the Spring, a spokesperson for Nigel Farage told PoliticsHome: “Nigel Farage is an active Member of Parliament for Clacton and is currently in the constituency as this article is being published.”
They pointed out that he made regular personal donations to charities and good causes, wrote a weekly column for the local newspaper and was the only MP to have ever held a business surgery in the constituency. They also stressed that MRP polls published since the last general election predicted an increased majority for Reform in Clacton.
But the words of some local politicians suggest he’ll be in for a tougher battle this time round than before.
“His excuse always seems to be that he’s the leader of the national party, so therefore he can’t be in the constituency all the time,” said one local councillor.
“But a lot of the time he’s not even in the country.”
Politics
Nigel Farage lays down the gauntlet
With righteous indignation, Nigel Farage has resigned today as MP for Clacton, triggering a by-election that he intends to fight. He’s giving up his seat in the hope he’ll win it back. Why? Because he believes it should be ordinary people, not the turbo-smug media classes, who determine his destiny. ‘Why should they be the people that decide my fate?’, he asked, spitting out the word ‘they’ with highly warranted contempt. Only ‘the people of Clacton’ should be ‘the judges of my actions’, he said.
It’s a bold move. For it wrestles Farage’s fate – and the future of populism itself – from the whining and mudslinging of the cloistered media classes and returns it to the cool deliberation of the people. It was in a televised press conference that he made his announcement. His voice quivering with rage, he slammed the media for obsessing over allegedly dodgy donations he received from rich pals. I’ve been subjected to ‘constant demonisation by the press’, he said, with the aim of hounding me from public life simply because I give voice to ‘the consensual view on many issues’. He then disarmed the knife-wielding media plotters, robbing them of their power by inviting the people of Clacton to pass judgement on him instead. It’s clever. And it’s risky.
The media have been sniffing for scandal around Farage for weeks now (well, years). The latest storm involves a £5million donation he received from a cryptocurrency investor in April 2024, before he became an MP, and some financial assistance he received from his longstanding ally, George Cottrell, who once did jailtime in the US for wire fraud. The parliamentary commissioner for standards is investigating the five million quid, which Farage did not declare. The media elites are salivating. Every earthly issue must now play second fiddle to their onanistic obsession with Farage’s ‘sleazy’ antics.
Two things can be true at once. One, Farage may not have followed all the rules on these donations (let’s see). And two, the media fever over the donations is a brazen political crusade motivated less by a love for probity in public life than by an ugly, burning urge to rid British politics of its best-known populist. Watching the scandal-hit Labour Party busily dig the grave of Farage’s career is almost too funny for words. Seeing the media say, ‘This is just about honesty in public life’ is even funnier. They must think we were born yesterday. We can all see the real slogan inscribed on the knives they’re wielding: ‘Finish Farage. Finish populism.’
The media elites spy an opportunity to do with the brute instrument of scandal what their kind have failed to do in the democratic realm: weaken Reform UK. They dream that newspaper headlines and backroom investigations will dent the clout of this party that ‘the gammon’ insist on voting for. It’s a highly anti-democratic endeavour dressed up as an effort to ‘restore trust’. Sadly for them, we’re not as dumb as they think. And Farage has now punctured their fake, bloated virtue by stealing their power to shape politics and giving it back to its only rightful exercisers: the people.
‘I am the most physically and verbally attacked public figure… of modern times’, he said. He reminded us that he’s had milkshakes thrown in his face, placards bashed over his head, death threats. The breaking point, he said, was The Sunday Times allegedly publishing a photo of the house where his daughter lives. He said he’s ‘never been angrier’. And now he’s decided it shouldn’t be milkshaking silver-spoon radicals or those posh hacks still blubbing over Brexit who determine his future – it should be working-class Clacton.
The Clacton by-election will be the anti-Makerfield. That by-election was triggered to bring about a coronation for the King of the North, Andy Burnham, so that he could sweep to power and fix the Labour Party while also enforcing his vision for Britain without the benefit of anything resembling a people’s mandate. In contrast, the Clacton by-election will invite ordinary people to pass judgement not only on Farage but also on the media, on the elites’ use of scandal as a political tool, and on the anti-populist intrigue of the cushioned classes. I, for one, relish the empowerment of the good people of this poor seaside town that Remoaners loathe because 70 per cent of them voted Brexit. Their unjaundiced judgement will be brought to bear on the breathless machinations of the privileged.
The stakes could not be higher. Many – including the bloody media – will strive to dent Farage’s chances. Labour activists will put a peg on their noses and beg the sunburned masses for a vote. It will be rough, and entertaining. And if Farage wins, it might just give the populist ethos the injection it needs. Let’s go. Let the people decide.
Brendan O’Neill is spiked’s chief political writer and host of the spiked podcast, The Brendan O’Neill Show. Subscribe to the podcast here. His latest book – After the Pogrom: 7 October, Israel and the Crisis of Civilisation – is available to order on Amazon UK and Amazon US now. And find Brendan on Instagram: @burntoakboy.
Politics
The House | Rebuilding the social fabric of this country must be a national priority

5 min read
Shared public spaces like libraries, parks and sports clubs help create strong communities. No longer can they be seen as nice-to-haves.
The work of councils reaches into almost every part of people’s lives.
It is there when a child needs protection, when someone needs care, when a family needs a home, when a road needs repairing, when a library gives someone a quiet place to learn, when a local business needs support, or when a community is hit by crisis.
That is why the new report by the Local Government Association (LGA), LG2040: Forces Shaping Local Government, matters. Published today (Tuesday), it looks ahead to the forces that will shape councils and communities over the next 15 years.
Its message is clear. Unless we act now, the country risks entering the 2030s and 2040s with weaker communities, higher demand for crisis services and a growing gap between what residents need and what councils can deliver.
One warning stands out. The loss of social infrastructure is becoming one of the biggest risks facing the country.
For too long, the places and relationships that hold communities together have been treated as valuable, but only if budgets allow. Libraries, parks, youth centres, leisure facilities, community hubs, sports clubs and shared public spaces cannot be seen as optional extras.
Social infrastructure is the foundation of strong communities. It is the quiet, everyday network that reduces loneliness, supports families, keeps young people engaged and helps older people stay connected. It is often where problems are spotted early, long before they become crises.
When these places disappear, the need does not disappear with them. It shows up in the NHS, in policing, in mental health services, in housing need, in community safety and in rising demand for urgent support. We pay for the loss many times over.
The pressures facing communities are changing. People are living longer. Young people face more insecure prospects. Health inequalities remain deeply rooted in some places. Climate shocks, economic insecurity and falling trust in institutions do not arrive neatly one at a time. They collide.
When they do, the strength of a community’s social fabric often determines whether a challenge is managed early or becomes a crisis.
That is why prevention cannot just be a slogan. It has to mean real places, real services and real relationships.
It is the library that keeps a teenager learning. The park that supports physical and mental health. The community centre that gives an older person somewhere to go. The youth worker who notices when something is wrong.
At its best, local government helps stop people falling through the cracks in the first place. But councils cannot rebuild the foundations of community while being forced to spend more and more of their budgets responding to acute need.
The current model is not sustainable. Councils cannot keep absorbing rising demand for care, children’s services, homelessness support and other urgent help while the funding, flexibility and certainty needed to prevent demand are squeezed.
That means a new settlement for local government.
Councils need sustainable long-term funding so they can plan ahead. They need greater freedom to join up services around residents, rather than work around Whitehall departments. They need the ability to invest in prevention, not just manage crisis. And they need national government to recognise social infrastructure as essential to the country’s resilience.
This should be an urgent priority for any prime minister who wants to improve public services and strengthen communities.
National reform will only work if it is rooted in neighbourhoods, towns and cities, and if councils are treated as partners with the tools to support people earlier.
This is also a significant moment for local government itself. Councils are facing major structural change through local government reorganisation, rising demand, tight budgets and growing expectations from residents. Recent local elections have brought a wider range of political voices into town halls, reflected in the growth of political groups at the LGA.
The LG2040 report is not a prediction of decline. It is a warning that the choices made now will shape the country we become by 2040.
Across the country, councils are already finding new ways to support people earlier, use data better, work with residents and build stronger local partnerships. But local innovation cannot replace national reform.
If we want a country where people feel connected, supported and confident about the future, we have to invest in the places and services that make that possible. We have to stop treating libraries, parks, youth services and community spaces as expendable, and start seeing them as part of how we keep people well, safe and connected.
As I begin my term as Chair of the LGA, I want to champion the role of councils in shaping the future of this country. Local government is not simply there to pick up the pieces when other systems fail. It is where prevention, resilience and trust can be built in people’s everyday lives.
That is the future we should be building towards. And it starts by rebuilding the social fabric of this country.
Cllr Eamon O’Brien is Chair of the Local Government Association
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: High Hopes
-
NewsBeat3 days agoTaylor Swift and Travis Kelce wedding staffer hilariously struggles to keep her cool while checking in megastars
-
Crypto World7 days agoAirdrop Registration Becomes Key Focus For Remittix As RTX Launch Updates Approach
-
Fashion2 days agoOpen Thread: What Great Books Have You Read Recently?
-
Politics5 days agoThe House | “Reframing the debate from a binary discussion of winners and losers”: Yuan Yang reviews ‘We Are Not Machines’
-
Crypto World5 days agoStandard Chartered Secures MiCA License as ESMA Adds 37 New Crypto Firms
-
Sports7 days agoBroncos roster: OL Ben Powers (No. 74) entering final year of contract
-
Business2 days agoAXT Shares Jump Nearly 14% as Semiconductor Materials Maker Rebounds on AI-Linked Indium Phosphide Demand
-
Crypto World6 days agoBinance stock trading tops $1B in first month after launch
-
Crypto World2 days agoSK hynix (000660.KS) Stock Dips as $28B Nasdaq ADR Offering Drives AI Memory Expansion
-
Crypto World6 days agoAlibaba-affiliate Ant Group enters the humanoid robot market with 12 deals
-
Crypto World3 days agoSouth Africa proposes crypto tax guidance under existing rules
-
News Videos1 day agoWhats Hidden Inside This Cash Register? #treasure #reselling #money
-
News Videos2 days agoBest Time to Enter Small Caps Right Now? Another Bull Run? | Financially Free
-
Tech3 days agoLenovo laptops are now shipping with YMTC SSDs, a sign of Chinese NAND entering the mainstream
-
Business6 days agoMeta Platforms Stock Jumps 7% Today as Bloomberg Reports Company Plans to Enter the Cloud Business
-
NewsBeat6 days agoNew exhibition reflects five decades of movement between island of Ireland and GB
-
Business5 days agoWhat a 10 Percent Drop Means for Buyers, Sellers and Renters
-
Crypto World5 days agoBinance Re-Enters Philippines As EU MiCA Rules Restrict Access
-
News Videos2 days agoAvoid entering in FOMO #bitcoin #cryptocurrency #trading #scalping

lead image
You must be logged in to post a comment Login