I have a treat for you. Clyde Best is a true West Ham legend. He can legitimately be described as Britain’s first star black footballer, and a real role model for the black players that followed him into the professional game in the 1970s and 1980s. He came to this country as a 17 year old from Bermuda in 1968 and played for West Ham from 1969-76, before playing for various teams in the NASL in the USA,

On 25 March, a new documentary will be premiered at Sadlers Wells East in Stratford. It’s called ‘Transforming the Beautiful Game – The Clyde Best Story’. It will have daily showings from 25th-28th March. Sadlers Wells East is the theatre on the right as you walk up to the London Stadium from the station.

After each screening, Clyde Best, Ade Coker and others will join a panel to discuss the documentary and the issues raised.

I’ve seen the documentary and it is absolutely superb. It features many players like Viv Anderson and Ian Wright, who say they couldn’t have had their careers without Clyde.

Last week Clyde came into the LBC studio and I recorded an hour long interview with me for my IAIN DALE ALL TALK podcast. We don’t normally film these, but in this case, I decided we would film it so I could share it with you.

So you can watch above, or if you prefer you can listen on the podcast HERE from 1am on Wednesday 11 March.

And if you want to attend one of the screenings you can buy tickets HERE.

The PR blurb for the docuentary describes it thus…

He was a striker, and at 17, he debuted alongside Sir Geoff Hurst for West Ham United. Despite constant racism, he rose to stardom—playing 218 first-team games and scoring 58 goals over his career. On Easter weekend in 1972, West Ham United became the first team ever to start three Black players in one game, making English League history: Clive Charles, Ade Coker, and Clyde Best. His untold story is featured in the new upcoming documentary Transforming the Beautiful Game, a powerful testament to resilience, quiet revolution, and a legacy that reshaped the future of the global game.

The Clyde Best Story features never-before-seen archival footage from historic matches involving the Bermuda National Team, West Ham United, and the NASL, paired with in-depth interviews with football legends including Ian Wright, Geoff Hurst, Viv Anderson, Garth Crooks, Rodney Marsh, Howard Gayle, and Harry Redknapp. Additional voices—Randy Horton, Bobby Barnes, Patrick Horne, Carlton Cole, Paul Davis, Ade Coker, Kasey Keller, and Clyde Best himself—add depth, perspective, and authenticity to the story.

Samurai suit of armour and helmet: Iron, silk, wool, leather, gold and lacquer, 1519 (helmet), 1696 (armour) and 1800s (textiles) | Image by: Charlie J Ercilla / Alamy

5 min read60 min

I was pleasantly surprised when The House magazine asked me to review the samurai exhibition at the British Museum. I had already been meaning to see it, particularly because of my great-grandmother who was Japanese and whose family had been samurai.

In the 1860s my great-grandfather had set up a trading company in Fuzhou (Foochow), a port in southeast China. It was there that he became friends with a Japanese artist who had left his homeland during the Meiji Restoration, and his sister, who later became my great-grandfather’s wife.

The emperor Meiji had ended over 250 years of Tokugawa shogunate rule, returning authority back to the emperor (the restoration is one of several periods covered in this excellent exhibition). This action catapulted Japan out of its isolation and, in an astonishingly tiny number of years, transformed Japan from a closed and feudal state into a modern, industrial and military power. It also ended the authority of the samurai and withdrew their extensive and arbitrary rights.

The exhibition charts the development of the samurai from loose collections of warriors into what eventually became a highly structured organisation in the 11th and 12th centuries, loyal to their shūgo (lord), up to their eventual demise in 1868. In fact, in their last 250 years, there were few battles to fight and many of them became more like civil servants, organised into a hierarchy and running different domains for their lord. Samurai had to adhere to their code: courage, righteousness, benevolence, respect, honesty, honour and loyalty.

As I walked around the exhibition, I became aware that the term ‘samurai’ is more commonly used in the West than in Japan. Instead, the usual Japanese term is musha for warrior – or bushi to describe the ruling class.

The pursuit of perfection is apparent in everything they did

Advertisement

The exhibition also carefully pointed out another misunderstanding – that samurai warriors mainly used their swords in battle. Their main weapons and the ones they trained on endlessly were in fact the pike (yari) and the bow and arrow (yumi and ya). The exhibition is filled with such weapons, including their swords (katana). 

And contrary to the generally accepted view that woman stayed at home looking after the household, the exhibition reveals how many women were trained in weapons and martial arts. Tomoe Gozen was one such female warrior, an expert in bow and sword in around 1180. There were also a couple of vivid paintings of a female warrior slicing through a soldier. 

Yet samurai weren’t just warriors – in fact, in the last 200 years before the Meiji Restoration, the country was pretty stable, with very little warfare. This led to them becoming artists, writers and poets, and the displays of their work were compelling. Perhaps the most illuminating was the painting of the formal procession of the courtesans in Edo (Tokyo), as well as books and paintings about the sexual proclivities of this warrior class.

The museum had also gathered together a fascinating and stunningly elaborate array of Japanese armour. Similarly exquisite, but more understated, were the various costumes and beautiful clothes.

This spectacular exhibition enabled me to see how detailed and precise the culture of the samurai was. 

From their armour and paintings to their books and swords, and even a deeply structured tea ceremony, the pursuit of perfection is apparent in everything they did – not just as armoured warriors engaged in the brutal art of war. In fact, this pursuit of perfection led even to the steel in their swords being of probably the highest quality in the world.

My great-grandfather’s brother-in-law, I understand, was one of those samurai who had become a full-time artist having moved to China – and which in turn led to their meeting.

As I wandered round the exhibition, I noticed how many young children were peering intently at the armour on display, even holding an imaginary katana above their heads. After all, much samurai culture has become part of modern western culture. You only have to look at the American film industry to see the extent of its influence. From The Magnificent Seven to Darth Vader’s helmet, cloak and lightsaber, we in the West of all ages remain fascinated by this unique group of people.

That’s why I recommend that anyone who can, should take the time to see this exhibition, and I congratulate the British Museum for putting it on.

Iain Duncan Smith is Conservative MP for Chingford and Woodford Green

Samurai

Curated by: Rosina Buckland and Joe Nickols

Venue: British Museum – until 4 May 2026

15 minutes made a lot of difference to unfit participants

This might help to explain why exercise is so good for our brains

An overhaul of the family courts system means that children will be better protected from abusive parents under a new law that MPs are set to debate today at a second reading of the Courts and Tribunals Bill.

Under the new Courts and Tribunals Bill, the government will revoke the law that judged a child should have contact with both parents, which campaigners argued has put the rights of abusive parents over a child’s safety.

The move follows a decade-long campaign by Claire Throssell MBE, whose two sons — Jack, 12, and Paul, 9 — were both killed by their father despite her warnings he was a danger to them. She has since campaigned to prevent unsafe child contact with dangerous perpetrators of domestic abuse.

The Women’s Aid ambassador said:

For a decade, I have been campaigning with Women’s Aid to change the family courts system to make sure that no child is ever again placed at risk of further harm from abusive parents.

Seeing that the presumption of parental contact will finally be repealed, and in the memory of my sons, Jack and Paul, is deeply meaningful.

No child should have to hold out a hand for help in darkness, saying that they were hurt by someone who was meant to protect them. No parents should have to hold their children as they die from the abuse of a perpetrator, as I did 11 years ago.

Family courts dismantle ‘pro-contact’ culture

The Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales, Claire Waxman OBE, paid tribute to Throssell’s “extraordinary bravery and determination in the face of unimaginable grief and pain”.

She welcomed the government’s landmark decision which marks a decisive shift away from a pro-contact culture in family courts that has historically placed children at risk of harm from abusive parents, Waxman explained.

She said:

[Throssell’s] success in removing this dangerous presumption from family law is a vital step in dismantling the dangerous ‘pro-contact’ culture that is so deep-rooted in our courts.

This is a hard-won victory for Claire, but more importantly, it is a lasting legacy for Jack and Paul — ensuring a new era of protection and justice for every woman and child seeking safety from abuse.

The presumption of parental involvement was introduced into the Children Act 1989 to help ensure children could maintain a relationship with both parents after separation.

However, evidence shows the current process can leave children at risk of harm from abusive parents.

The current law contains safeguards that allow involvement to be restricted where it harms a child’s welfare, but repealing this provision is what campaigners have advocated for.

Featured image via Unsplash/Suzi Kim

Over 100 Labour MPs have co-signed a letter to the CEO of Travelodge to request a meeting to discuss a sexual assault that occurred in the hotel chain. According to the letter, a woman was sexually assaulted after making a solo booking at the hotel – only for staff to give her attacker a key to her room. The perpetrator of the sexual assault, Kyran Smith, told staff he was her boyfriend and needed another key card. Despite not being present on the booking, the hotel gave him that key which enabled his abuse.

Smith has since been convicted and sentenced to 7.5 years in prison. Nevertheless, the letter addressing this serious incident also refers to a woeful response from Travelodge in light of their security error was to offer a measly £30 compensation to the victim.

Travelodge have serious questions to answer

However, as these Labour MPs highlight, the Travelodge played an intrinsic role in enabling this abuse and their remedial response should be far stronger. Once again, corporates have little compassion for ordinary people even whilst they play a hand in their very real trauma.

A woman was sexually assaulted in a Travelodge. Staff gave her attacker the key to her room after he pretended to be her boyfriend. She was offered £30 in compensation. Appalling.

Along with 100 Labour colleagues, I’ve written to Travelodge’s CEO & asked to meet. pic.twitter.com/1pxjVqZvn3

Advertisement

— Anneliese Midgley MP (@anneliese_midge) March 8, 2026

This letter paints an appalling image of this corporate hotel company. It details how the abuse was able to have taken place, and highlights how little safeguarding is present for women, or frankly anyone, staying at Travelodge’s across the country. Apparently, despite the victim of assault having made a solo booking, the hotel staff didn’t think it was appropriate to double-check the abusive man’s claim by speaking directly to the guest. No, a man walking in and laying claim to her is enough to invade her privacy without question, according to shady-as-fuck Travelodge.

The MPs listed four areas of focused discussion:

We would also welcome the opportunity to discuss:

1. Travelodge’s security policies and procedures relating to providing a key card and/or room number to someone not named on a booking
2. Travelodge’s safeguarding training processes
3. Any training relating to Violence Against Women and Girls that Travelodge provides for staff
4. Changes that Travelodge will make to the above to ensure the safety of women staying at your hotel chain

I’m a signatory.

This case is sickening. My thoughts are with the victim following this sexual assault.

Advertisement

We need urgent answers from @TravelodgeUK who did not take VAWG seriously.

What are their security procedures? How do we stop this happening again? https://t.co/kCE2ImnOmP

— Dawn Butler ✊🏾💙 (@DawnButlerBrent) March 9, 2026

‘We want to apologise to the victim’

Travelodge have said that they recognise the £30 compensation offer was ‘inappropriate’. Since, they have told the BBC:

The safety and security of our guests is our priority and we were deeply concerned to hear of this distressing incident and our sympathies are with the victim.

We want to apologise to the victim for the way this incident has been handled.

Travelodge adopts industry standard security procedures which were followed at the time of the incident in 2022.

We will carry out a full review of our room security policies to learn from this incident and further strengthen our procedures.

We covered the rising fear in women and girls as figures continually rise back in October, pointing out how men are seemingly more emboldened than ever. Discussing this terrifying rise, we wrote:

Domestic abuse is a serious issue, accounting for 54% of rape crimes between April 2024 and March 2025, with the remaining being committed by men over the age of 16. There is also a marginal difference between the likelihood of being attacked by a stranger or an acquaintance, making it a minefield for vulnerable women and girls.

In the last 20 years, sexual offences have increased: from 970 against young girls under-13, and 8,192 against women over 16 to 5,067 and 49,075 respectively. When looking at all rapes, crimes have increased by 511%.

In fact, rape offences doubled between 2014 to 2019, rising from 29,420 to a horrifying 59,999. There is a slight reduction seen in 2020/2021 down to 55,685, during COVID and lockdown periods, before shooting up to 70,031 the following year.

Women have enough to fear without fearing our safety and security in hotels

Privacy and security are human rights and protected by civil law. Nonetheless, women and girls have continually suffered abuse at some point, if not multiple times in their lifetimes. Abusive men have long believed they can do whatever they want to their victims, often getting off on the most invasive and traumatising ways they can do so.

This incident is horrifying and will spark fear in every woman across the country. Equally terrifying is the feeling that other men may see this and get ideas of their own, leaving more women in harm’s way. The fact Travelodge’s security procedure is supposedly ‘industry standard’ suggests this must be levelled across the hotel industry as a whole.

Therefore, Labour MPs are completely right to press this deplorable incident, but they must push further. We hope they push hard against the Travelodge to take action that truly shows they recognise the trauma inflicted by the sexual assault they played an essential role in making possible. As a woman myself, I know that I won’t feel safe until I hear all hotels have safeguarded against this life-changing risk of abuse.

Frankly, I’d have thought something as egregious as this could not be possible in the first place. More fool me, I guess.

Featured image via the Canary

Right-wing warhawks have been doubling down on calls to slash Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) welfare to fund imperialistic warmongering against Iran.

Naturally, it’s the usual suspects spearheading the charge, namely opaquely-funded think tanks, the billionaire press, and of course, their co-conspirators in parliament.

And once again, these rich colonial capitalist assholes all want to make poor and disabled people cannon fodder for their illegal invasions.

Slash DWP welfare to fund illegal war: here we go again

First to the welfare cut chest beating was the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) on 3 March. As the US and Israel heinously massacred close to 800 people in Iran, unprovoked, including 168 children at a girl’s school, the CSJ slipped out a comment on chancellor Rachel Reeves’ budget with a not-so subtle militaristic subtext. Predictably, policy director Joe Shalam lambasted the “spend on health benefits” compared to the “defence budget”, calling it a:

monumental waste of human potential.

Translation: disaster capitalists are ogling the opportunity to exploit disabled people for war profits.

Next came former Tory MP Dehenna Davison on Jeremy Vine spouting the same worn rhetoric. And incidentally, she drew on CSJ research:

Nobody gets PIP for “low level anxiety and depression”. The criteria does not allow it and 62% of PIP claims are rejected as there has to be evidence of severity. So Im afraid zero bombs could be made by stopping this as it isnt happening. CSJ talking shite as usual. https://t.co/Z1FC4txS9E

— Spin Decoder (@leith1076) March 6, 2026

Meanwhile, leader of the opposition Kemi Badenoch was at Conservative spring conference maxing out the jingoism. She was banging on about bringing back the two-child limit to benefits. According to the Independent, a Tory policy wonk somewhere has totted up the numbers. The party calculated that un-abolishing the cap would spare the government £3.2bn worth of annual spend.

Instead of lifting hundreds of thousands of kids out of poverty, the Tories want to use half that to recruit 20,000 new troops. And doubtless the majority of them will be from working class households the cap has trapped in poverty to boot.

Reporting on this, vile shitrag the Daily Mail prefaced its headline “Bullets over benefits”. Because that’s the kind of clickbait late-stage capitalist hellscape we now live in. It’s one where major political party leaders would literally rather the government spend taxpayer cash to buy bullets to murder kids in cold blood abroad, than fund social security to stop kids from starving in one of the richest nations in the world.

The Centre for Social Justice pushing warfare over welfare

Then, over the weekend, the right-wing press – including the Express and the Telegraph – went into further overdrive.

The culprit was once again Iain Duncan Smith’s brainchild, the CSJ.

Specifically, it published research utilising Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) estimations that welfare spending will increase by £18bn this year. By the CSJ’s maths, it said this could finance:

15 advanced Royal Navy frigates, 220 fighter jets, or 250,000 soldiers’ salaries, more than three times the size of the regular British Army.

However, even the war-frenzied Labour government came out critical, calling it a “deeply disingenuous report”. Notably, it pointed out that “well over half” of this will be spent on pensions. Of course, it was quick to then highlight its defence budget increases. And consequently, it undid any good work it did debunking the CSJ analysis.

And as is the ego-massaging nature of think tanks, both the Henry Jackson Society (HJS) and the Taxpayers’ Alliance reared their ugly warmongering, welfare-snatching heads here too, backing the CSJ.

The kids aren’t alright – so let’s stop state support and send them to war?!

The CSJ also snuck into its press release on the research that it had:

called on ministers to follow through with proposals to scrap certain benefits for under 22s to instead fund a scheme helping employers take on British young people not in work, education or training.

So of course that scheme it’s referring to is the government’s flagship ‘Youth Guarantee’. That’s the one hellbent on shunting young people into low-paying or below minimum wage labour. And naturally, as the Canary’s Rachel Charlton-Dailey has pointed out, it’s about kicking them off Universal Credit as well.

Unsurprisingly, the vicious CSJ wants the government to fund the Youth Guarantee by literally banning “certain benefits” for under 22s. In March 2025, (now former) DWP boss Liz Kendall actually announced its disgraceful plan to do just that with the limited capability for work related activity (LCWRA) part of Universal Credit (UC).

At the time, the Canary’s HG noted how a callous Kendall told ministers her depraved plan for tackling youth unemployment involved pushing more young people to join the armed forces.

Now it appears, in just under a year, we’ve already come full circle. At the end of February the DWP held its first Youth Guarantee jobs fair. Behemoths of the military industrial complex stacked it to the rafters. As Charlton-Dailey reported:

the Royal Air Force and the UK Armed Forces were there to seduce working-class kids with the promise of a stable income, a roof over their heads and “duty”.

What’s more, arms manufacturers propping up Israel’s genocide in Gaza, and now undoubtedly the attacks on Iran, were out recruiting in force.

National security over social security: the same old story

One happened to be F-35 fighter jet parts supplier Teledyne. The electronics manufacturer had a seat at the table in a cosy 16-company discussion with DWP boss Pat McFadden. And just who has been vociferously sounding the battle cry to cut welfare to increase military spending? That would be, former paid Teledyne advisor and retired “general for hire” – ex-army chief and currently suspended peer, one Lord Richard Dannatt.

Ultimately, when the right-wing establishment calls for cuts to welfare for warfare, it means serving up working class and disabled people to its necro-capitalist war-machine.

The narrative of slashing social security to beef up supposed ‘national security’ is certainly nothing new. It’s an abhorrent time-honoured tradition that UK governments collaborate in militaristic colonial resource-grabbing with the US and other imperialistic warmongers. And there’s a pattern of governments using it to redirect the public’s attention away from their own corruption and failures. The ‘enemy’ abroad distracts from and justifies austerity at home.

In the coming days and weeks, we can likely expect many more calls like this from greedy imperialistic grifters – let’s be honest, mostly wealthy white men – whose kids the DWP won’t be forcing to the frontlines or production houses of another illegal war.

Featured image via the Canary