Connect with us

Politics

Epstein, Mossad, and the question we are not allowed to ask

Published

on

Epstein, Mossad, and the question we are not allowed to ask

The latest release of documents connected to Jeffrey Epstein has reignited a familiar media ritual. Names circulate, while royals and celebrities dominate headlines. Moral outrage flows freely, and safely in directions that neatly avoid the structures of power.

Epstein – the unasked question

But beneath the spectacle lies a question that mainstream commentary continues to avoid, despite its growing inevitability:

Was Epstein operating as part of an intelligence-linked blackmail operation? And if so, for whom?

This is not a conspiracy theory, but a legitimate question that the files themselves provoke.

Advertisement

Epstein’s death in 2019, officially ruled a suicide but shrouded in conspiracy, left a trail of unanswered questions. The financier’s rise from humble Brooklyn teacher to billionaire was always suspicious.

How did a man with no clear business acumen amass such wealth? Epstein’s partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of media tycoon Robert Maxwell, a confirmed Mossad asset who died under mysterious circumstances in 1991, provides the smoking gun. Multiple Israeli prime ministers attended Robert Maxwell’s funeral, with Shimon Peres delivering the eulogy.

‘Honeytrap’

Former Israeli intelligence officer Ari Ben-Menashe has alleged Epstein and Maxwell ran a “honeytrap” operation for Mossad, luring elites into compromising situations to extract favours or silence. This is no conspiracy theory; it is echoed by Steven Hoffberg, Epstein’s former business partner, who alleged Epstein frequently flaunted his Mossad connections.

Survivor Maria Farmer described the network as a “Jewish supremacist” blackmail ring linked to the Mega group, a cabal of pro-Israel billionaires including Les Wexner, who gifted Epstein his Manhattan mansion.

Advertisement

Epstein held multiple passports (a spy’s toolkit) and reportedly fled to Israel after his first charges in 2008 before securing an extraordinary non-prosecution agreement that allowed him to continue operating freely.

It is also worth noting that Israel has long been a legal and jurisdictional refuge for sexual predators, particularly where extradition would expose intelligence, financial or diplomatic sensitivities.

Israel’s intelligence services, including Mossad, operate globally and extrajudicially by design. Like all major intelligence services, they cultivate leverage, assets and influence networks beyond formal diplomatic channels. Sexual blackmail has been widely documented as one such method across intelligence history, from the Cold War to present.

What distinguishes the Epstein case is not the abstract possibility of intelligence involvement, but the patterned convergence of factors: unexplained wealth, elite access, transnational mobility, institutional protection and repeated investigative shutdowns. These are not the characteristics of a ‘lone wolf’, but of a pernicious foreign influence over celebrities, politicians, bankers and media moguls.

Advertisement

Recent revelations

The most recently released files only amplify these suspicions. An FBI report from a confidential source claims “Trump has been compromised by Israel,” citing leverage through Jared Kushner and Alan Dershowitz. Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre accused Dershowitz, a staunch defender of Israel, of involvement, though she later retracted her statement amid legal pressure.

The scale of Epstein’s reach is difficult to dismiss as coincidence. Across politics, finance, media and celebrity culture, the same names, or at least the same circles, recur with unsettling regularity.

In politics, the record is already public. Former US president Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s private jet numerous times, a fact acknowledged but persistently minimised. Donald Trump, for his part, publicly described Epstein as a “terrific guy” who enjoyed the company of “beautiful women… on the younger side”. While these statements are not crimes on their own, they are indicators of proximity.

Media power was no less entangled. Senior figures from major broadcasting and publishing empires, from former CBS chief Les Moonves to media baron Rupert Murdoch, surface repeatedly in the documents and testimonies, either through social proximity, shared intermediaries, or financial overlap.

Advertisement

Epstein did not merely socialise with media elites; he embedded himself within institutions capable of shaping coverage, suppressing stories, and disciplining dissent. When journalists attempted to pursue the story aggressively, they encountered legal pressure, editorial resistance, or sudden loss of access.

Hiding in plain sight

Celebrity culture played a complementary role. High-profile figures moved through Epstein’s orbit not necessarily as conspirators, but as legitimising assets. Fame provided cover, glamour, and normalisation.

The presence of globally recognisable names diluted suspicion, transforming what should have been alarming access into social banality. Ironically, it was over-exposure that provided the perfect cover for Epstein’s crimes, rather than secrecy.

Flight logs and visitor records name Hollywood stars like Leonardo DiCaprio, Naomi Campbell, and Kevin Spacey, alongside tech titans such as Bill Gates. While some deny involvement in illicit activities, their proximity to Epstein’s web implies potential leverage over public influencers who mould cultural discourse.

Advertisement

Similarly, major institutions including JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank continued to service Epstein long after everyone knew his criminal record. Internal compliance failures have since been acknowledged, but the broader question remains unanswered: how did a convicted sex offender retain access to the global banking system at the highest level? Who judged the risk acceptable – and why?

Geopolitical leverage

Further evidence of Mossad’s fingerprints emerges in Epstein’s dealings with international crises. Emails from July 2011, just a month before Muammar Gaddafi’s fall, show Epstein and associate Greg Brown plotting to recover up to $80bn in frozen Libyan funds, assets deemed sovereign, stolen, or misappropriated by Western powers.

Brown believed the true amount could be four times higher, reaching $320bn. Their scheme involved leveraging MI6 and Mossad agents to extort concessions from postwar Libya, still assumed under Gaddafi’s control, in exchange for returning the funds for “reconstruction”.

This wasn’t mere opportunism; it points to Epstein’s role in geopolitical manoeuvring, using intelligence networks for financial and strategic gains aligned with Israeli interests.

Advertisement

The real Epstein scandal

The conclusion, then, is not a lurid morality tale about “bad people doing bad things,” nor the tired revelation that royals, celebrities, or billionaires behave with impunity. That much is already obvious. Child abusers exist across every class and every society. What does not exist everywhere is a system that records, archives, weaponises, and protects that abuse for strategic ends.

The Epstein case points not to isolated depravity, but to structured leverage: an architecture of blackmail in which sexual crimes become instruments of power rather than grounds for prosecution. That is why the fixation on individual scandal – princes, parties, and gossip – functions as misdirection.

The real scandal is the evidence of an intelligence-linked operation in which Mossad repeatedly appears as a point of reference, protection, and utility; an operation that embedded itself across politics, finance, media, and celebrity culture.

Not all abusers are documented and not all are shielded. And not all become untouchable.

Advertisement

Epstein did because he was useful. Until this is discussed in those terms, as a question of foreign influence, the story will remain trapped in spectacle, and the system it exposes will remain intact.

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

FIFA hypocrisy after Israel murder over 400 Palestinian footballers

Published

on

The Board of Peace and FIFA have announced plans to build 55 football pitches, an academy, and a national stadium in Gaza. Meanwhile, Israel has murdered over 400 footballers, destroyed every football pitch in the country, and made millions of Palestinians homeless.

Yet now, a board of rich, old, and (all but one) white men is deciding Gaza’s fate. This is after supplying weapons and supporting Israel’s genocide for over two years. 

The hypocrisy is off the charts. 

Since October 2023, Israel has murdered at least 437 Palestinian footballers — and that figure could actually be far higher.

Advertisement

Over half of these were children.

Israel destroyed all 51 football clubs, along with 9 stadiums and the communities that came with both.

Advertisement

Turning pitches into graveyards

At one point, Israel bombed a football pitch at a Palestinian refugee camp in Southern Lebanon, whilst 13 children were playing on it.

Advertisement

Israel then claimed it struck a ‘Hamas training compound’.

Of course, FIFA has turned a blind eye for over two years as Israel has murdered innocent people.

FIFA quickly suspended Russia from international tournaments after it illegally invaded Ukraine. But of course, it did not take the same action when Israel launched its full-scale genocide on Palestine.

As the Canary previously reported:

Advertisement

FIFA has ignored restrictions on the movement of Palestinian players and the targeting of stadiums and sports facilities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and the imposition of Israeli clubs in settlements at the expense of Palestinian federations.

Now, FIFA is using a Trump-esque AI video. Could they create something more fucked up if they tried?

Anyway, in what world is this Gaza:

This looks more like the UAE than Gaza.The men’s attire shown above is primarily associated with Gulf states. The racist AI video generator clearly cannot distinguish between different Arab populations — and FIFA apparently didn’t bother checking what its own use of AI produced before publishing it.

Advertisement

Orientalism at its finest.

FIFA enabling ethnic cleansing

As if it was not bad enough that FIFA has been allowing Israel to compete internationally. Now, it is an active participant in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

Israel has murdered tens of thousands of Palestinians, and the West collectively ignored it. Now they’re going to jump on the graves of children to expand their capitalist empires as if Palestine has not suffered enough for the last 70 years.

We can only presume that this is some sort of soft launch for a future tournament in Israel. Of course, the powers that be – who happen to be mainly friends-of-nonces- will have no intention of including Palestine in said tournament. That’s if there are even any footballers left to invite because Israel has murdered them all.

Advertisement

If the board of peace, Israel, or FIFA think that a few new stadiums will make the world collectively forget the brutality of the last two years, they have another thing coming.

And who’s to say Israel would not bomb new stadiums as soon as Palestinians set foot in them? The rest of the world watches on as Israel labels whatever the hell they like Hamas targets and gets away with cold-blooded murder.

Advertisement

Neither a sporting governing body nor a ‘board’ made up of rich old men should be allowed any part in building on the graves of children.

Feature image via VERTEX/YouTube

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Churchill statue branded ‘zionist war criminal’ in Whitehall

Published

on

Churchill statue branded ‘zionist war criminal’ in Whitehall

Conservatives and fascists got two absolute spankings last night. First, their man lost in the Gorton and Denton by-election. Then an activist graffitied Churchill’s statue in Whitehall — and not for the first time. That’s a tough 24hrs for people who think they’re living in the movie Zulu because they once saw an Asian person in Big Asda.

Here’s the Canary’s news report on the incident.

You can see the ‘damage’ — I mean, it does just wash off — below:

Poor Winston got called a ‘Zionist war criminal’. Another part of the graffiti said ‘stop the genocide’. Thing is… Churchill was a proud Zionist and a key architect of several British imperial genocides. So while it is a bit naughty to spray that stuff on his statue… what was said isn’t technically inaccurate. The graffiti also said ‘free Palestine’, which doubtless added to the right-wing meltdown.

Met Police said a man was arrested at the scene at 4am on 27 February. It’s striking that he was detained for “racially aggravated criminal damage”:

Proud Zionist

Churchill was a racist, Zionist and imperialist to his core. In fact to be fair to him he never said he wasn’t. He held these views proudly and loudly. The only people who have an issue with this basic fact are his weird cultists. Who, perversely, are often also racists.

Left-wing writer Tariq Ali wrote a (bloody good) book about the cult of Churchill and the reality of the man’s views. He told Current Affairs in May 2022:

He was a supporter of the Spanish fascist dictator Francisco Franco. He supported Franco like Hitler and Mussolini did in the Spanish Civil War.

Churchill was also “a terribly open admirer” of Italian fascist leader Benito Mussolini:

Advertisement

He said, what a great role Mussolini was playing in Italy. [“I could not help being charmed by his gentle, simple bearing,” Churchill said of Mussolini.

Then we have the 1943 Bengal famine, which may have killed 3mn people. A British-manufactured horror which:

Churchill refused, explicitly, to intervene to stop that famine.

And don’t forget Churchill’s 1944 crushing of the Greek resistance in favour of fascism:

the order given to the British commander, who the resistance had allowed to enter Athens, that if the resistance doesn’t do as we say, treat Athens as a colonial city. And the bloodbath that occurred in Greece as General Scobie tried to crush the Greek resistance.

Churchill’s views, as you can imagine, on Palestine flow quite naturally from these.

Churchill and Israel

Churchill, like so many imperialists in his day and ours, was both a supporter of Zionism AND an antisemite.

Advertisement

He supported the Balfour Declaration (the colonialist Middle East carve-up which helped get us where we are today) as British colonial secretary:

 I am in full sympathy with the historical traditional aspirations of the Jews.

And said:

Jerusalem must be the only ultimate goal. When it will be achieved it is vain to prophesy; but that it will some day be achieved is one of the few certainties of the future.

Yet he wrote in 1940 that Jews

have been partly responsible for the antagonism from which they suffer.

And that:

Advertisement

there are times when one feels instinctively that all this is only another manifestation of the difference, the separateness of the Jew.

Of the Palestinians and their claim on their homeland, he had absolute contempt:

I do not admit that the dog in the manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time.

He also denied that:

a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America, or the Black people of Australia.

Churchill said such people had just been replaced with “a higher grade race.”

Nice bloke…

Advertisement

Now vandalising public monuments these days is going to get you in trouble — whether the politics are agreeable or not. In this case it seems to have been Dutch pro-Palestine activists. But if we’re talking about the graffiti itself, the claims made aren’t inaccurate. So maybe it’s time butthurt Churchill fans stop pretending and own their hero’s legacy as a racist and bigot.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Pakistan declares ‘open war’ as fighting with Afghanistan rages

Published

on

Pakistan declares ‘open war’ as fighting with Afghanistan rages

Fighting on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border has intensified. One Pakistani minister has described it as a state of “open war”. And Pakistan has hit the Afghan capital Kabul with airstrikes.

Afghan forces launched attacks across the British-created Durand line on 26 February. And Pakistan has called the Taliban regime — which replaced the US-led occupation in 2021 — illegitimate and accused it of harbouring militants.

Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said on 27 February:

Afghan soil is not being used; but, the Afghan Taliban regime is fully aligned with these terrorists and is completely backing these terrorists.

Al Jazeera reported on 27 February:

Advertisement

Pakistan launched air strikes on Afghanistan’s capital, Kabul, as well as on Kandahar and Paktia, early on Friday. The attacks targeted Taliban military installations as Islamabad declared “open war” on the group’s government, in the most serious military confrontation between the two neighbours in years.

One Kabul resident described her terror:

Then we heard gunfire. When we looked out of our apartment window, we saw bullet-like flames going up in the sky.

Al Jazeera said the airstrikes:

came hours after Afghan forces launched coordinated cross-border attacks on Pakistani military positions in six border provinces late on Thursday. Kabul claimed 55 Pakistani soldiers were killed and 19 outposts captured.

Border war

Border fighting broke out in October 2025. A subsequent Turkey and Qatar-brokered ceasefire has now broken down.

The origins of the fighting are complicated. Ahram Online reported:

Advertisement

Islamabad argues that the authorities in Kabul, led by the Taliban, have failed to curb the activities of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, a separate but ideologically aligned group that has intensified attacks inside Pakistan since 2021.

The Taliban deny this is the case. Kabul-based political analyst Obaidullah Baheer said:

Pakistan claimed that it was doing that in response to TTP attacks based on the bogus claim that the Taliban are supporting the TTP, an insurgent group operating within Pakistan.

Drop Site News posted a timeline of the breakdown in diplomatic relations since January 2026:

The Pakistan has also banned personal drones after Afghan forces used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in their attack:

The ban is effective nationwide immediately and will remain in place until further directives are issued. All provincial governments and chief secretaries have been asked to ensure strict enforcement of the directive.

Vast US arsenal

A vast arsenal of US military equipment and weaponry was left behind in 2021. Those weapons are now fuelling the war. As the Canary reported on 4 February:

those weapons have flooded neighbouring Pakistan

The Foundation for Economic Education broke down some of the numbers involved. They said the giant arsenal included:

Advertisement

includes up to 22,174 Humvee vehicles, nearly 1,000 armored vehicles, 64,363 machine guns, and 42,000 pick-up trucks and SUVs.

There were mind-boggling amounts of small arms — and even artillery:

the list of allegedly abandoned weaponry includes up to 358,530 assault rifles, 126,295 pistols, and nearly 200 artillery units.

CNN reported that the border region holds vast quantities of copper and other minerals and metals which the US craves:

Pakistan says there is much more wealth beneath its soil –– an estimated $8 trillion in copper, lithium, cobalt, gold, antimony and other critical minerals.

This reality has:

oiled an unlikely friendship with US President Donald Trump, who has put mineral acquisition at the heart of US foreign policy

Pakistan and Afghanistan’s colonial underpinnings

The colonial nature of the conflict zone can’t be ignored either. National Geographic describes the Durand Line as:

Advertisement

part of a long history of colonizing countries establishing borders that serve their own political purposes while ignoring the cultures and ethnicities of the people living there.

As Ahram Online explained:

The roots of the crisis trace back to 1893, when British diplomat Sir Mortimer Durand signed an agreement with Afghan ruler Abdur Rahman Khan to demarcate a frontier between British India and Afghanistan. That line split Pashtun tribal lands between two political entities.

After independence in 1947, Pakistan:

inherited the Durand Line as an international boundary under the principle of state succession. Successive Afghan governments, however, avoided formally recognizing it as a permanent border. The dispute has simmered for decades, occasionally flaring but rarely disappearing.

The neighbours view the border very differently:

Pakistan views the border as legally settled and central to its territorial integrity. Afghanistan’s position has historically been more ambiguous, shaped by ethnic ties, nationalist sentiment, and resistance to what many Afghans see as a colonial imposition.

This explosive combination of competing territorial visions and competition for vast mineral resources is compounded by colonial history and the presence on both sides of the border of vast arsenals of lost American weapons. And ordinary people of the region aren’t without agency, yet to some degree they remain hostage to imperialisms both old and new.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Brit Awards 2026: What Geese Star Max Bassin Said In His Censored Speech

Published

on

Brit Awards 2026: What Geese Star Max Bassin Said In His Censored Speech

It’s fair to say that the censors had plenty to keep them busy during this year’s Brit Awards.

Saturday night’s Brits broadcast saw the sound being pulled on numerous occasions due to a variety of comments that were made over the course of the event.

One such moment came during musician Max Bassin’s acceptance speech, after he accepted the International Group Of The Year prize on behalf of his band Geese.

Choosing to keep things short, he began his speech by stating simply: “What’s up, ‘the Brits’? I just want to say, free Palestine…”

Advertisement

However, after Max said the word “free”, the audio was pulled, resulting in the rest of what he had to say being cut from broadcast.

It later emerged that Max concluded his speech: “Fuck ICE, go Geese.”

Many Brits viewers were quick to voice their upset at what appeared to be ITV censoring Max’s politically-charged speech right as the drummer was about to speak out in solidarity with Palestine.

ITV bleeped out Geese’s speech saying Free Palestine😒😒

— James (@jamesIipa) February 28, 2026

Advertisement

seeing ITV censor Geese saying free Palestine in real time feels so gross and dystopian

— brodie / knox (@brodiecantskate) February 28, 2026

itv muting geese saying “free palestine” embarrassing !!

— paige (@SSN0WGL0BE) February 28, 2026

itv blanking out geese saying free palestine im sooo tired of the censorship in this wretched country my god

— bec ☄️ (@lokiislit) February 28, 2026

However, in response to this backlash, the broadcaster has indicated to HuffPost UK that Max’s speech was censored due to his language after his pro-Palestine message – in other words, his use of the word “fuck” – rather than because of his political statements.

Advertisement

Earlier in the night, the Brits also pulled the sound when Jack Whitehall made a seemingly unscripted joke about Peter Mandelson, after spotting Manchester mayor Andy Burnham and Labour minister Lisa Nandy in the awards show’s audience.

“I wonder who else is here,” he quipped. “I think I saw Peter Mandelson on the list. Oh wait, that was another list…”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

US citizens’ support for Israel plummets, new data confirms

Published

on

US citizens' support for Israel plummets, new data confirms

Israel’s Gaza genocide and constant demands for money and military support have caused its popularity to nosedive among US citizens. A new Gallup poll shows a dramatic about-turn in the colony’s standing across the board, especially among Democrats and unaligned voters, but reaching even to the Republican party.

The change is even more dramatic considering how stubbornly Americans held onto their support for Israel through decades of its abuses and slaughter of Palestinians. Almost two and a half years of ongoing genocide have finally shifted things in a healthier direction and the change has Israel and its lobby flailing.

Before 7 October 2023, more than half of Americans favoured Israel over Palestine, while less than a third felt the opposite. Now, 41% say their sympathies are with the Palestinians and support for Israel is barely over a third:

US support for Israel plummets

The fall has been accelerating. In May 2025, Gallup found that support for Israel among Americans was 46%, a figure that was already significantly down. Since then, Israel has lost almost a quarter of the support it still had at that point.

Advertisement

However, Gallup’s data show that the change was already underway before the 7 October 2023 raid into southern Israel, though it accelerated markedly after that. This is almost certainly indicative of the US right’s growing dissatisfaction with what it perceives as an “Israel first” approach of US government and many politicians. Even the late right-wing icon Charlie Kirk had disavowed his support for the colony and rejected its money before he was publicly murdered in September 2025, though the Israel lobby moved quickly to try to hide it after his death.

The fall has been sharpest among registered supporters of the US Democratic party. Ten years ago, half of Democrats supported Israel; now, that has fallen to just 17%:

In a sane world, or even a genuine democracy, such a shift in support would have a profound effect on US foreign policy. That the US continues to pursue war on Israel’s behalf — with Democrat lawmakers scarcely less supportive than Republicans — shows just how diseased, bought and corrupted US politics is under the Israel lobby, like its counterpart in the UK.

Featured image via the author

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Campaign Against Antisemitism wrist slapped for ‘mismanagement’

Published

on

Campaign Against Antisemitism wrist slapped for 'mismanagement'

The Charity Commission has found what it described as “mismanagement” by the misnamed ‘Campaign Against Antisemitism’ (CAA) for political activities at odds with its status as a ‘charity’. The CAA claims to combat antisemitism, but is in fact an Israel-funded lobby group that specialises in “defaming Palestine solidarity campaigners.”

CAA has been under scrutiny since September 2024, when it attacked as “obscene” the Starmer government for daring to make even a phantom reduction in arms licences to Israel. A further complaint was lodged with the Commission by human rights group CAGE in 2025. CAGE describes CAA, along with its fellow lobby group ‘UK Lawyers for Israel,’ as “Britain’s apartheid lobby” for their vexatious attacks on support for the Palestinian people against occupation, oppression and genocide.

However, the Commission’s announcement falls far short of the appropriate step of stripping a political lobbying group of its charitable status. This is hardly surprising: the Commission has been investigating CAA since at least 2018 without effective action.

Campaign Against Antisemitism guilty of mismanagement

The Charity Commission criticised CAA’s ‘failure’ to retain records relating to its 2024 political attack as “mismanagement”, said it had doubts that CAA’s statement “furthered the charity’s [supposed] objectives” and said it had issued the CAA with a “remedial Action Plan”. This treats CAA as if its conduct were merely shoddy and in need of improvement, rather than in line with its real, Israel-supporting goals — even though the Commission admitted it had received other complaints about its behaviour.

Advertisement

The Commission views failing to retain records relating to this decision making as mismanagement in the administration of this charity.

Further complaints have also been raised about CAA’s attack on the UK’s judicial system because a jury had dared to declare the Starmer regime’s ‘terror’ ban on anti-genocide group Palestine Action unlawful. CAA has boasted of its role in securing the ban.

CAA boss Gideon Falter is one of the central figures in the Israel lobby’s attacks on the Labour left during the Corbyn era. In 2024, as hundreds of thousands protested peacefully against Israel’s genocide in Gaza, he tried to claim that police had prevented him from ‘crossing a road’ because of the threat posed by a ‘hateful’ anti-genocide march. In fact, he had turned up with a security detail — not to ‘cross’ the road but to try to barge through the demo in the opposite direction.

Jewish anti-genocide group JVL lodged a 2020 complaint that CAA is a “highly politically partisan organisation which does not deserve charitable status”. JVL welcomed the Commission’s action against CAA as “not before time”. However, in reality it amounts to nothing more than a light slap on the wrist for one of the Israel lobby’s worst offenders. It evidences once again how spineless UK institutions are against the genocide lobby.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Arrested At The SOTU… For Standing

Published

on

Arrested At The SOTU... For Standing

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”a8b1493a-8194-46b7-9354-6895828cf102″}).render(“69a3841be4b008ee6ce24eb6”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Netanyahu reportedly abandons Israelis

Published

on

Netanyahu reportedly abandons Israelis

War criminal Benjamin Netanyahu has fled and flown to Greece – like he did in last year’s ’12-day war’ – as retaliatory Iranian missiles batter Israel.

What else would the butcher of Gaza, Netanyahu, do but display his wide yellow streak, turn tail and run – leaving ‘his’ country and its occupying population to burn behind him.

Genocidal Netanyahu is a coward

And how it showed. While Netanyahu ran away, Iran’s missiles skipped past Israel’s defences as easily as they did in June 2025 and wrought havoc. There were scenes of utter panic at Israeli ports and shelters:

This is not even Iran’s full response yet. Whereas last year it used swarms of drones and missiles to overwhelm Israel’s defences, now it apparently needed just thirty:

Advertisement

US news station NBC broadcast one major strike:

A Mossad-run call centre was hit, according to not yet confirmed reports:

Israeli TV was broadcasting live as a missile struck:

Footage showed other missiles breaching Israel’s ‘dome’:

Advertisement

Some of the missiles, though not all, were ballistic – though not yet apparently Iran’s most effective hypersonic types:

Israeli propaganda account ‘Stand With Us’ has just reported ‘red’ warnings across Israel, showing the scale of danger and panic:

Advertisement

And new footage posted by an ABN News producer shows that the attack continues to intensify:

Locally-shot footage showed devastation where the missiles struck:

Advertisement

The coward Netanyahu and his colony love to bomb and murder children and the defenceless. They run away when a victim can strike back.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Brit Awards 2027: All The Must-See Moments You Might Have Missed

Published

on

What a smile, what a suit, what a shoe choice

The biggest night in British music was an especially big one this year.

On Saturday night, the 2026 Brit Awards took place in Manchester for the first time, in a night that delivered glittering performance, a few surprise wins and plenty of moments that kept ITV’s censors busy.

If you missed this year’s broadcast and want to catch up (or, indeed, if you were only half-watching, and you’re wondering if there were any bits that completely passed you by), then you’re in luck, because we’ve rounded up X of the top must-see moments from the 2026 Brit Awards…

Before the ceremony was even underway, Harry Styles made us smile on the red carpet with this business suit/ballet pumps combo

Anthony Harvey/Shutterstock

Rosalía got her night off to a suitably dramatic start with this complete serve

Anthony Harvey/Shutterstock

And it was a strong showing all-round from some of our fave celeb couples, including Jade and Jordan Stephens

Anthony Harvey/Shutterstock

…and darts icon Luke Littler and his long-term girlfriend Faith Millar

Advertisement

Comedian Jack Whitehall kicked off his sixth time hosting the Brits with a skit paying homage to his love of Harry Styles

The man himself then opened the show properly with a performance of Aperture, complete with a lot of hand-ography and bum-wiggling

Jack Whitehall pulled absolutely no punches with his introductory Brits monologue, coming for everyone from Alex Warren (‘what you get if you order Ed Sheeran on Temu’), Lily Allen (‘her album was launched into the charts like a torpedo – only this torpedo didn’t sink a ship, it destroyed a Harbour’), Robbie Williams (‘he’s had more comebacks than his hairline’) and Noel Gallagher (‘Songwriter Of The Year… 1996’)

Oh, and he also delivered this jibe at the expense of the BBC

Jack Whitehall dings the BAFTAS at the #BRITAwards: “There may be some swearing but don’t worry, we’ve got the best in the business on the bleep button. It’s the guy who did the BAFTAS. Nothing gets past him” pic.twitter.com/qeNewZyYQm

— Deadline (@DEADLINE) February 28, 2026

Advertisement

The voices of Huntr/x brought the joy with a performance – a pre-recorded one, we should add – of their hit Golden

And Olivia Dean’s rendition of Man I Need was similarly just… absolutely lovely, to be honest

Raye’s vocals on her renditions of Where Is My Husband! and Nightingale Lane were truly jaw-dropping

I need non raye stans to know how crazy the nightingale lane brits performance is, she’s been sick for WEEKSSSSS like she really gave this one her all omfg pic.twitter.com/SswFYVgV7O

— MⱯRGⱯUX 🦇 (@LUCIDNIGHTM4RE) February 28, 2026

…and they were similarly quick to censor an introduction by Angry Ginge, to (he was jokingly calling London a ‘shithole’ if you’re interested)

Jack Whitehall then told us we were about to have ‘our minds blown by the incomparable Rosalía’ and he was absolutely not wrong

Advertisement

Oh and yes, Rosalía actually managed to get Björk back performing at the Brits for the first time in more than 30 years

The sound was pulled once again after Geese musician Max Bassin declared ‘free Palestine, fuck ICE’ during his International Group Of The Year speech

Jack Whitehall’s exchange with Shaun Ryder and Bez started off chaotic and only ventured into increasingly surreal territory

Alex Warren’s performance included a surprise guest spot from James Blunt because hey why not?

Noel Gallagher kicked off his Songwriter Of The Year speech by thanking his brother and Oasis bandmate Liam

Mark Ronson’s Outstanding Contribution performance featured some lovely tributes to Amy Winehouse

…as well as a surprise(-ish) appearance from Dua Lipa

Rosalía’s special night just kept getting better as she was crowned International Artist Of The Year, beating some seriously stiff competition including Taylor Swift, Chappell Roan, Bad Bunny, Bruno Mars, Sabrina Carpenter and Lady Gaga

And CMAT had some fun with the cameras at losing out in this category for the second time

The night’s top winner Olivia Dean was visibly elated to pick up the Brits’ top honour, Album Of The Year

And finally, following a speech by Sharon Osbourne and her daughter Kelly, Robbie Williams was absolutely spot-on with his musical tribute to Ozzy Osbourne, which closed the show

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Tel Aviv gets a taste of its own medicine

Published

on

Tel Aviv gets a taste of its own medicine

In maybe the only good news of the year so far, Iranian ballistic missiles have struck both Tel Aviv – including Mossad HQ – causing major damage.

Of course, white Jewish Israelis will be running to their cosy little bomb shelters. Meanwhile, as we have seen previously, the illegal settlers exclude minorities.

And Netanyahu? The dickhead responsible for the chaos across the entirety of the Middle East flew out of Tel Aviv quicker than Donald Trump can post to Truth Social when new Epstein files drop.

IsNOTrael is getting a taste of its own medicine.

And I’m guessing all media broadcasts will be banned from Israel in 3, 2, 1…

Israel is finally getting an iota of what it deserves for murdering thousands of Palestinians.

Advertisement

Netanyahu and Trump bomb civilian areas, killing children in the process, and then run, hide or party. They give zero fucks about the lives they are taking.

Anyone who has chosen to stay in Israel after watching Netanyahu and his terrorist government wage war on Palestinians for the last two and a half years needs to give their head a shake. And quite frankly, I have zero sympathy that they now have bombs falling on them.

Featured image via the Canary 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025