Politics
Farage called out for turning down parliamentary security offer
Reform UK politicians have been complaining that Parliament left Nigel Farage and his MPs without security. Now, it’s emerged that Farage literally turned down a security detail which would have matched that of Kemi Badenoch – the leader of the opposition:
Exclusive: Nigel Farage turned down taxpayer-funded security including a bodyguard, car and trained driver last year, The i Paper has learned.
The Reform UK leader was offered the protection following police advice on the threats he faced.
He had already been receiving… https://t.co/ryTOQtrFSg — caroline wheeler (@cazjwheeler) July 13, 2026
Making things even murkier, Farage has also claimed that the undeclared £5m ‘gift’ he was given was for security – a claim which is now failing to hold up.
Farage not feeling safe and secure
As we reported on 13 July, Zia Yusuf was taken to task for his angry claims that Reform MPs receive “no protection whatsoever”. As it turns out, they do receive security, with one MP telling Kevin Schofield of HuffPost UK:
Each MP is afforded personal security at their advice surgery and constituency engagements should they wish.
We’re also able to make use of physical security measures at our homes and offices – including cameras, door strengthening devices, and alarm systems.
And we’re able to carry personal alarms with us, which are provided by Parliament, and can be activated to alert a call centre – and the police – should we find ourselves in a dangerous situation.
Given the latest revelation, it seems that Farage just didn’t like what he was offered – all despite it being above what other MPs get. As Caroline Wheeler of the i paper said:
The Reform UK leader was offered the protection following police advice on the threats he faced.
He had already been receiving publicly-funded security prior to this, and felt that his package had been downgraded.
It would have given Farage a similar level of security to Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and some high-profile Cabinet ministers.
Farage declined the offer because he considered the protection to be inadequate.
Of course, Farage is fine to turn down whatever he likes. What he’s not fine to do is have his attack dogs claim he was offered nothing.
A Reform spokesperson claimed that Farage needs more protection that Badenoch or several Cabinet ministers because he’s:
the most targeted politician in Britain and the only party leader who actually goes out to meet the public in huge numbers on the campaign trail.
The misleader of the opposition
Former Liberal Democrat councillor Bruce McDonald noted:
Farage declined the offer because he considered the protection to be inadequate. Yusuf and he have vilified the authorities ever since.
The Speaker and the Public Security Department for obvious reasons do not comment on individual cases
Farage and Yusuf have taken advantage of this policy to lie and lie again
Yusuf has been able to make his claims unchallenged because he’s not an MP, which means the speaker of the house can’t reprimand him for spreading misinformation. Oh, and the reason he’s not an MP is because he keeps getting turned down when he begs to run. Almost as if Reform can’t stand the wee gobshite either!
Yusuf isn’t the only one making blatantly false claims anyway:
Robert Jenrick is spot on here. Stripping Nigel Farage of his security was a completely stupid, vindictive move from a Home Office steeped in lefty bias.
The establishment despises Nigel so much they’re perfectly happy to leave him and his family exposed to danger. It’s a… pic.twitter.com/tTK57R7Vim
— Darren Grimes (@darrengrimes) July 13, 2026
‘Stripped’ of his security, apparently.
And these people wonder why no one trusts them!
Backlash
As with everything else right now, this latest kerfuffle is connected to Farage’s £5m gift scandal. As we previously reported on that:
Farage accepted the £5m gift from Harborne – a crypto billionaire – in 2024. At the time, he’d said he wouldn’t run in the general election, but this changed after he received the £5m. The problem is that after he became an MP, he was supposed to declare any ‘registrable benefits’ from the previous 12 months. Farage did not declare the £5m, and now it looks like he was purposefully trying to hide it.
Political commentator Don McGowan sifted through the available information and noted:
In a Telegraph article of 1st October 2025, Zia Yusuf claimed that his private security cost £1M but was being funded by private donors.
A million pounds, a year.
This has since been disputed, and even Farage told the BBC that Harborne’s £5M would cover his security for the rest of his life.
Which is it?
Given the above, it’s clear why Farage has flip-flopped between claiming the undeclared £5m was for his security and claiming it was for whatever he liked. He must have realised at some point that the figures didn’t add up, and now that’s obvious to everyone. All because Reform decided to make a big stink about how unsecure dear leader is.
So- he was offered security comparable to the official leader of the opposition – turned it down
Received £5M he claimed was for 'security' but admitted not using it..
What kind of fuckwit buys this shite? https://t.co/YVjU9wjVhh — Stephen Bryant
(@Stephenmoogles) July 13, 2026
Reform politicians are having a hard time making sense of all this, anyway, with Liz Webster of Save British Farming noting the following of Richard Tice’s Newsnight appearance:
Richard Tice ties himself in knots on #Newsnight trying to explain Nigel Farage’s £5m “security” gift.
Farage rejected state-funded security because he needs considerable security.
He’s not spending the £5m because the need for security might fall away.
And Reform is paying for his security anyway.
Clear as mud.
Farage and the whiff of corruption
Commenter Supertanskiii offered this explanation for Farage turning down state protection:
Well well well…
Probably didn’t want the police keeping tabs on his activities… https://t.co/hGwyLMlJ3X
— Supertanskiii (@supertanskiii) July 13, 2026
We’ve no way of backing up this accusation, obviously but we can explain the context in which she made it. Farage has multiple ongoing investigations into his financial activities; his party also attracted controversy because a senior member was imprisoned for taking bribes to promote Russian interests. As a result, people have begun to view the party with a healthy degree of scepticism.
Much like with Farage’s by-election stunt, it seems that Reform is just trying to deflect from its many scandals. All that Reform politicians are doing, though, is ensuring they’re the centre of attention. And that attention is doing them no favours whatsoever.
Featured image via the Canary
By Willem Moore
Politics
Cardiff Uni student assaulted by security staff for holding Palestine flag
Security staff have twice assaulted a Cardiff University student — for holding a Palestine flag and then for trying to take a photo of them. The Caerdydd Students for Palestine (CS4P) group described what happened:
As a student was on the way OUT of graduation she was physically assaulted and had the Palestinian flag ripped out of her hands with such violence it ripped her acrylic nails off.
She was simply carrying the flag in her hands on her way out of the building. She was then assaulted AGAIN when trying to get photos of the staff after they refused to give their names as seen on this video.
The blonde woman also mocked the word genocide and said graduation “isn’t political.” The arena supervisor said there’s nothing they could do!
Please share this everywhere and say SHAME on @utilitaarenacardiff and their violent staff. This was the actions of SUPERVISORS.
@cardiffuni this is who you trust to manage your graduations?
The group posted footage of the two staff involved:
View this post on Instagram
Cardiff University — a shameful record
This is not Cardiff University’s first rodeo when it comes to suppression of Palestine solidarity — nor the Utilita Arena’s. In July 2025, the university threatened to remove students for a display of solidarity, while Utilita staff harassed and intimidated students wearing keffiyehs:
View this post on Instagram
At the beginning of 2025, the university was accused of spying on pro-Palestine staff and students. A month earlier, it had suspended two students for taking part in an anti-genocide protest. In May 2025, it set police on students holding an anti-genocide picket and in June went to court for an injunction against them.
CS4P has asked opponents of genocide to share news of the latest incident widely.
Featured image via Cardiff.ac
By Skwawkbox
Politics
14yo charged with terror offence for alleged plan to attack mosques
A 14-year-old boy has been charged with a terrorism offence over an alleged plan to attack two mosques in the Sutton area of south London. The plan, the latest in a flood of Islamophobic violence, was linked to “extreme right-wing terrorism”.
The youth was originally arrested on suspicion of criminal damage, but a subsequent search of the address revealed “a number of documents of concern” according to the Met Police. He is in custody and will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ court tomorrow ,16 July 2026.
“Very serious terrorism”
For once, after months of the establishment ignoring Islamophobic violence, police officers responded appropriately to the planned attack. Detective Chief Superintendent Nick Blackburn said:
These charges come just days after 12 people were arrested for a suspected threat to an Islamic festival in Suffolk and a man was arrested for an alleged assault outside a mosque in Leyton.
We should not underestimate the cumulative impact of incidents of this nature on the Muslim community.
His colleague counter-terror Commander Helen Flanagan added that this is a “very serious terrorism charge against a young boy” that is “particularly concerning” to the Muslim community.
Featured image via MiddleEastMonitor
By Skwawkbox
Politics
Trump’s hyped national guard deployments did absolutely nothing to lower crime
US president Donald Trump’s much-hyped national guard deployments did nothing to lower crime rates. Canary readers will recall how Trump filled the streets of US cities with troops at the start of his second term.
A major centre-left US thinktank has now debunked any claims that the military presence lowered crime. And what’s more, the whole project has ripped off taxpayers to the tune of billions.
The Center for American Progress (CAP) warned in a new report:
The second Trump administration is trying to take credit for the historic drop in violent crime across America despite the fact that this trend began before it took office, and it is using these declines to justify expanding policies that are unpopular, ineffective, and costly.
However, CAP claims the data “clearly shows” violent crime and homicides were:
already dropping in American cities in 2023 and 2024.
Yet:
the Trump administration has continued to threaten city and state leaders and argue that its extreme actions, such as deploying the National Guard to support law enforcement operations, are improving public safety.
CAP reported:
analysis finds no evidence that National Guard deployments have reduced violent crime.
And they added that:
if these deployments are extended and continue through the end of 2026, they could cost American taxpayers more than $1.7 billion.
The authors were very blunt in their conclusions. Trump has no basis to make any claims his deployments worked as stated:
This analysis should give policymakers confidence to reject out of hand the Trump administration’s claims that its actions have materially improved public safety in these cities, call out its falsehoods, and demand better solutions for the American people.
Trump’s ICE are still killing people
And while the story has largely dropped out of international media, Trump’s immigration thugs are still killing people in the US.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reportedly killed a Colombian national in the north-eastern US state of Maine on 14 July. The BBC reported:
An ICE agent has fatally shot a Colombian national during an immigration enforcement operation in the US state of Maine.
The killing came only:
a week after the agency used deadly force against another migrant in a Texas traffic stop.
The authorities have not identified the man killed, but:
local lawmakers and neighbours have identified him as Joan Sebastian Guerrero.
The truth is Trump’s military deployments and increased ICE thug raids were never about security for the public. They were about militarising public spaces, hunting terrified migrants and rebuilding the US in Trump’s image: as a fearful place with a more obedient and, ultimately, whiter population.
Featured image via the Canary
By Joe Glenton
Politics
Unions and anti-corruption campaigners react to damning Covid Inquiry report
Yesterday, 15 July, the Covid Inquiry published its latest update — this time focusing on the Johnson government’s failure to secure adequate personal protective equipment (PPE). In response, both anti-corruption campaigning organisations and the unions representing affected hospital workers have been swift to issue their condemnation.
As the Canary’s Joe Glenton previously reported:
Boris Johnson’s government wasted £10bn on unusable personal protective equipment (PPE), the Covid inquiry report has found. Inquiry chair Heather Hallett also slammed the then-Conservative government’s use of firms with Tory ‘VIP’ connections to fulfil major PPE contracts.
BMA: Government performance ‘an omnishambles’
Reacting to the Module 5 report, British Medical Association (BMA) council deputy chair Dr Emma Runswick said:
What we saw unfold was an omnishambles; a scramble in procurement, supply and distribution, resulting in chaotic and slapdash approaches to try to get PPE to those who needed it.
Yet we know they often didn’t receive it. Time and time again, from the beginning of the pandemic, and right through the multiple waves of 2020, doctors and our colleagues were left without the PPE needed to protect them and their patients from a fatal disease. This impact was uneven, with women and ethnic minority doctors either unable to access suitable fitting PPE, or indeed, facing greater pressure to work without proper protection.
Runswick also highlighted that the report “makes a number of positive recommendations” for preparation. However, those recommendations served to highlight the UK’s current sorry state:
it is shocking, six years on, to see in black and white that still not enough is being done to ensure both the size and quality of the PPE stockpile, or prepare more widely.
A new pandemic, as well as wider global risks in an increasingly hostile world, remain very real threats to our healthcare systems and the safety of our population. Yet we remain unprepared – both in terms of supplies like PPE, but also in the state of the very buildings we work in, the facilities to provide critical care, and the staffing capacity we have to treat people.
Royal College of Nursing: “is unforgivable”
Meanwhile, the Royal College of Nursing’s (RCN) reaction was similarly outraged. Rose Gallagher, the RCN’s leader for infection prevention during the pandemic, said:
This report is a damning indictment of just how badly nursing staff were let down. The total failure to plan meant stockpiles of PPE were too low, while much of the equipment meant to protect our profession didn’t fit or work effectively. That so many staff were forced to repurpose shower caps, or wear bin bags in desperate attempts to protect themselves, should be marks of shame for the successive governments that left us so unprepared.
Gallagher also praised the nurses who continued in their vital work despite the dangerous position the government placed them in. The infection-prevention lead added:
Despite this litany of government failures to prepare, nursing staff continued to show up for their patients knowing the very real risk to themselves and their families. We know so many died after being sent onto wards, into care homes and into the community with inadequate protection. Meanwhile, scores more continue to live with the long-term effects of Covid to this day. It is unforgivable.
Even back in 2021, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) had already noted the disproportionate level of deaths among nursing staff. The ONS recognised 157 deaths among nurses, averaging over 50 fatalities per 100,000 members of the profession. [ED NOTE: (24.5+79.1)/2=51.8]
Anti-corruption campaigners on PPE report
Given the scandal of the bogus procurement contracts, corruption watchdogs also offered comment on the latest report. For example, Gavin Hayman – executive director of the UK Anti-Corruption Coalition’s Open Contracting Partnership — said:
The British Government bought the wrong things, from the wrong people, in the wrong way. The Inquiry has shown what happens when emergency powers, weak controls and political access collide with disastrous results. Giving huge direct awards to untested companies [specialising in lingerie, drinking straws, confectionery and the like] recommended by politicians harmed the UK’s Covid emergency response.
Likewise, Transparency International UK works with governments and businesses to tackle corruption both at home and around the world. Chief executive Daniel Bruce, who previously gave evidence to the inquiry on behalf of the UK Anti-Corruption Coalition, said:
The inquiry’s report lays bare the failings of the so-called VIP lane for PPE contracts. It confirms our earlier findings that there was systemic bias in awarding contracts to those with connections to the party of government and that, in a majority of cases, there was no objective assessment of those firms’ ability to actually deliver PPE.
The inquiry underscores the damage done to public trust by a prolonged and unnecessary failure of transparency in public spending.
It also challenges the new government to go further to guard against the risk of corruption in future emergencies.
And for PPE Medpro?
Spotlight on Corruption is a research and monitoring organisation which publishes findings on the UK’s implementation of its anti-corruption laws. Executive director Sue Hawley criticised the so-called ‘VIP Lane’:
Its ongoing use, beyond the very early stages of the pandemic, undermined trust in government, and trust in government is never more important than during a public health emergency.
VIP contracts failed at three times the rate of standard ones and cost 80% more per unit, even as nurses resorted to bin bags on the frontline. Five years on, nearly £10 billion has been written off, only one supplier has been taken to court, and the public is still owed a full accounting.
The supplier Hawley alluded to there is PPE Medpro. The firm, which has links to Tory peer Michelle Mone through her husband Doug Barrowman, is at the centre of an ongoing criminal investigation. Mone recommended the company to other ministers, who promptly awarded it over £200m in PPE contracts.
Mone and Barrowman have denied any wrongdoing. The National Crime Agency is still investigating, but hasn’t yet brought charges. However, the company has already had to pay back £148m to the government by order of the High Court.
Whilst the Covid Inquiry held a full day of hearings on PPE Medpro, it can’t yet publish the results due to restrictions surrounding the criminal proceedings.
Featured image via Senedd
By Grace
Politics
SAS troops dropped prisoners from forklift ‘for fun’, inquiry hears
SAS troops currently under investigation for war crimes dropped prisoners from a forklift “for fun”, an inquiry has heard. And one soldier who served with them was allegedly called a “Taliban-loving apologist” for raising concerns about the elite unit’s behaviour.
The inquiry into allegations that the SAS extrajudicially murdered Afghan civilians between 2010 and 2023 occupation heard from two whistleblowers on 14 July:
Monica Grenfell, a former journalist, and Christopher Green, who was part of the Army Reserve, contacted the Afghanistan Inquiry to give evidence after the chairman issued a request for information.
According to Sky News:
Both witnesses spoke behind closed doors with only redacted excerpts released on Tuesday.
Green served alongside special forces as an attached army reservist. He tried to raise concerns about the killings of three Afghan brothers. Green said the deaths were:
described to him as having “gone wrong”, forcing special forces to shoot lawfully “in self-defence”.
However, Green said the army’s intelligence was:
pretty clear that there was nothing to suggest that the sons were anything other than farmers and even less to suggest that they were Taliban commanders.
When he raised these concerns with a liaison officer, he encountered strong resentment from the elite commandos:
At some point he did call me a ‘Taliban-loving apologist’.
Green also asked to see so-called ‘gun tapes’ — video recordings of the raids — but was denied access despite having the right security clearance.
SAS — Forklift ‘fun’ with prisoners
Monica Grenfell served alongside the SAS as a stores person and kitchen staff member. She told the inquiry she was informed by a soldier that special forces troops had abused prisoners by lifting them up on the forks of a forklift and then dropping them.
I specifically recall him telling me that he would put prisoners on a forklift, raise it up and drive very fast so that they fell off.
Grenfell said she had:
Never been anywhere that was as bad as there.
There was a sense that:
People had been let off the leash somehow.
You felt no one was really watching them [the soldiers], and the language was just… I’ve never known the language like it.
After the US-led occupation of Afghanistan collapsed in 2021, then-PM Boris Johnson said UK troops should be:
Proud of their achievements and we should be deeply proud of them.
The nature of allegations which have since the war included suppressed evidence, murdered children, and failure to report serious allegations simply to spare the alleged killer’s morale. They make this kind of grandiose claim even more precarious than before.
The story of the UK’s shadow war in Afghanistan may never be fully known, but the kind of stories starting to appear are shocking indeed.
Featured image via the Canary
By Joe Glenton
Politics
Gathering of Latino-American politicians shows little love for Argentina
LOS ANGELES — Some of the most powerful Latino politicians in the United States were invited to wear their favorite soccer jerseys. But few chose Argentina’s Abiceleste.
Mayor Frank Figueroa of Coachella, California said his feelings toward Argentina as a “Latin American country” (in finger quotes) were so strong, he was willing to back England, the team that knocked out Mexico — where Figueroa traces his heritage — in a contentious quarterfinal match.
“Just by looking at their soccer team. For me, it’s like who’s playing on the soccer team compared to all the other Latin American countries who had the people playing on their team,” said Figueroa. “That is a big thing for me. They all look European.”
With the World Cup semi-finals coinciding with one of the country’s largest gatherings for Latino policymakers, organizers of the National Association of Latino Elected Officials annual conference embraced the timing. They have scheduled Telemundo World Cup watch parties in a hotel ballroom and are selling NALEO soccer jerseys to celebrate the organization’s 50th anniversary. Multicolored soccer jerseys — most commonly the green of Mexico’s El Tri — were scattered among the polished suits and business-casual attire in the conference venue.
But the absence of support for the tournament’s only remaining Latin American team was notable. In fact, it was easier today to spot England’s colors than Argentina’s hours before the two countries faced off in Atlanta.
Argentina’s history of blanqueamiento policies encouraging mass European migration, sanctuary for Nazis after World War II and its “genocide” against Afro-Argentines contributes to the “systemic problems and challenges” in Argentina’s history, said Karina Moreno, a councilmember representing Palm Desert, California. It’s a history that Moreno said continues the “fallacy” of superiority from Argentina to other Latin American countries.
Animosity towards Argentina was compounded after Argentine media personality Eduardo Feinmann said he “detested Mexicans” in on-air comments after Mexico’s tournament exit last week. Feinmann went on to describe “the envy the Mexicans feel for us Argentines, not just in football, but in everything.” The ensuing controversy escalated with a public rebuke from Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum.
“It’s not the first time, and it validates what we’re talking about,” Moreno said, referring to the incident.
The behavior of Argentina fans has also come under scrutiny, with FIFA opening an investigation into a supporter’s alleged racist abuse of American streamer IShowSpeed during the team’s victory against Cape Verde earlier this month. Egyptian coach Hossam Hassan’s made FIFA’s designated gesture to report racist abuse — a crossed-arm “X” gesture — against Argentina..
Salta Lake City councilmember Alejandro Puy, a Salt Lake City councilmember sported one of the rare Argentina jerseys. Raised in Buenos Aires, he says “rivalries are expected” between countries in soccer.
“Ultimately we are all brothers and sisters of this continent and we stand by it,” Puy said, though he still says there’s “no doubt” Argentina has the best team in Latin America.
Though he said he appreciated the Latino camaraderie in the conference, Puy was headed to Argentina’s Consulate in Los Angeles to watch the game and not feel “a little alone.”
Politics
Scottish independents should back England, needles conservative leader
Tory Leader Kemi Badenoch was in a jovial mood during the usually combative PMQs by calling for all MPs to unite behind England against Argentina this evening.
Badenoch said that while Keir Starmer may be “disappointed that he won’t be emulating his hero Harold Wilson in winning multiple elections … we all hope that he may be about to emulate him in another way, by being the prime minister when England win the World Cup.” England’s only previous success came in 1966.
The Tory leader said that was something “every single one of us in this house should get behind, especially the SNP.” But the diminished rump of Scottish independence-supporting MPs, possibly still bruised from going out in the World Cup group stage, shook their heads.
Indeed, opposition to England’s success crossed party lines.
Scottish Labour MP Brian Leishman told POLITICO he’ll be watching “from behind the couch and the cracks in our fingers,” adding it will be “unbearable” if England makes the final.
Politics
Big day for a British Overseas Territory (no, not that one)
LONDON — Soccer fans in Atlanta may be exchanging chants about the Falklands — but there’s another British Overseas Territory making news today.
The 118-year-old border between Gibraltar and Spain will disappear on Wednesday. You can thank Brexit.
Today is the culmination of a decade of uncertainty for the British Mediterranean territory, which back in 2016 voted by 95.9 percent to stay in the EU — but was pulled out against its will.
Life immediately became harder for the thousands of people who cross the Gibraltar-Spain border every day, including 15,000 Spaniards who go to work in the territory.
Passport checks became more onerous and transporting goods became more complicated. As a result Brussels, London, Gibraltar and Madrid have spent the last 10 years negotiating an agreement to remove physical border controls from the frontier with Spain.
It’s an ironic move given it was triggered by Britain’s decision to leave the EU. While Gibraltar will remain fully British and sovereign, the border will become, for the most part, just a line on a map.
The agreement’s details will be familiar to anyone who has ever taken a Eurostar train under the English Channel. As at London St Pancras station, passengers arriving at Gibraltar’s airport will go through both Gibraltarian passport controls and EU passport controls in succession. Once through, they’ll be free to roam both Gibraltar and the Schengen area, provided they get the approval of both authorities.
As a result, Gibraltar and Spain will do away with border controls at the land border. Gibraltar will also align with various EU single market and customs rules to ease the flow of goods, which have sometimes become harder to source since Brexit.
Gibraltar is adamant it isn’t joining the EU passport-free Schengen area. Legally, it is right.
For many passengers, though, it will feel pretty similar, with no passport checks to walk into Spain. The difference will be that Gibraltar will still set its own visa policy.
The U.K’s Europe Minister Stephen Doughty is formally signing the agreement Tuesday in Brussels with the EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič.
The deal was a bipartisan effort on the British side, with former Foreign Secretary David Cameron working to get it over the line during his time in office. In spring 2024 the deal looked close to being done — only for Rishi Sunak to call an election. The resulting change in government delayed it by another year.
Some critics, notably Tory Euroskeptics, have said the agreement harms Gibraltar’s sovereignty, but the Rock’s government is very keen on the plan.
“Brexit was sold to the British people in a false prospectus,” Gibraltar’s Chief Minister Fabian Picardo told the Telegraph newspaper in the run-up to the dismantling of the border. “The United Kingdom needs to seriously reconsider its relationship with the European Union, whether that is to return to membership or a much closer relationship.”
Politics
Sikhism must not be put on trial after Henry Nowak’s murder
Some reports of Henry Nowak’s killing have described the murder weapon as a Sikh sword, a ceremonial knife or a large Sikh dagger. That matters. Once the word ‘Sikh’ is attached to the weapon, the crime begins to look like a case about religious liberty. It was not. The Sikh faith was invoked in Vickrum Digwa’s defence – but it should not have been. The kirpan is an article of faith. The criminal use of a blade – and the blade Digwa carried – is not.
More than 20 years ago, I published a paper in the Psychiatric Bulletin on the care of Sikh patients who wear the kirpan. It was about a practical question: how clinicians might respect a patient’s religious observance without compromising safety on a hospital ward. I did not expect to return to the subject because of a murder. The killing of Henry Nowak in Southampton, and the debate that followed, has made that necessary.
The facts established at trial are stark. Digwa was convicted of murdering 18-year-old student Henry Nowak. Digwa inflicted five wounds with a large blade and then told the police, falsely, that he had been the victim of a racist assault. The jury rejected his claim of self-defence. The sentence has since been referred to the Court of Appeal as potentially unduly lenient, though that is a separate question from the one I wish to address here.
What is important is that this murder does not turn into a religious dispute. Whatever else may be said of the case, no question of religious entitlement arises from these facts, and it is a source of real distress to me, and many other Sikhs, that the language of faith was enlisted in his defence at all.
Digwa did not kill with the small kirpan that was recovered, unused, from around his neck. He killed with a separate and much larger blade. Some reports have called the weapon a kirpan. Others have called it a Sikh sword. That loose language is a problem. A blade cannot be carried or used as an offensive weapon just because the man carrying it is Sikh.
There is a martial inheritance in Sikhism. That should not be denied or airbrushed away. Shastar Vidya, the art of weaponry, has a place within parts of the Sikh martial tradition. But it is a discipline, not a licence. It does not require a weapon to be carried in public, as has been widely claimed. Still less does it justify drawing one in anger. To present the carrying of an offensive weapon as a religious duty is an inversion of Sikhism.
The kirpan is one of the five articles of faith, the Panj Kakkar, worn by initiated Sikhs of the Khalsa, the order constituted by Guru Gobind Singh in 1699. Its name is commonly understood as joining kirpa (mercy) and aan (honour). The kirpan is normally sheathed and worn against the body. It is not there to suggest the wearer has a right to violence – it is a reminder of one’s duties: to resist injustice, protect the vulnerable and govern one’s own passions. Sikh teaching is clear that it is not to be drawn in aggression. A man who turns a blade on an unarmed youth has not exercised a religious right. He has betrayed the discipline the kirpan signifies.
English law already draws this distinction. Under section 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, it is an offence to carry a bladed or pointed article in public. The act provides a defence where it is carried for religious reasons, but the burden is on the accused to establish that this is the blade’s purpose. What’s more, it is only a defence for possessing such a blade – it is not a licence to use a blade as a weapon. The Nowak case is not evidence that religious minorities get away with violence that would be punished in others. Instead, it is evidence that the law’s existing limits operate as intended.
Other countries have faced the same concern. In Canada, the Supreme Court held in Multani v Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys that an absolute ban on a non-violent schoolboy’s kirpan infringed religious freedom, while allowing conditions: the kirpan had to be secured and sewn inside his clothing. The court sensibly observed that many ordinary objects may be misused without being prohibited. Italy went the other way. In 2017, the Court of Cassation upheld a fine imposed on a Sikh man in Lombardy for carrying a kirpan of almost 20 centimetres outside his home. The court was explicit that public safety must prevail and that those who choose to settle in a country are bound to observe its law.
Parts of that judgment’s reasoning, which strayed into pronouncements upon the proper character of Italian society, were criticised. Yet what followed is instructive. The roughly 200,000 Sikhs in Italy, the largest such community in continental Europe, did not respond with defiance or disorder. They accepted the ruling and continued, as before, to be counted among Italy’s most industrious and law-abiding citizens. Liberal societies can set different boundaries. What they should not do is confuse religious symbolism with permission for violence.
There is a wider point here. In many countries where Sikhs have settled – Britain, Canada, East Africa and Italy among them – the pattern has generally been one of hard work, integration, civic loyalty and service. There is no contradiction between Sikh identity and obedience to the law of the land. Sikh tradition enjoins respect for just law. It also forbids the use of the kirpan as a weapon. A Sikh has no more quarrel with legal limits on a blade designed to cause harm than a Scottish Highlander has with legal limits on the sgian-dubh.
We must resist two mistakes. The first is to let one crime cast suspicion on every Sikh who wears the article Digwa dishonoured. The second is to let religious language soften the plain character of what happened. It was murder. The sentencing judge himself remarked that Digwa’s actions had wrongly associated a faith-based symbol with a brutal crime. That false association is what should be challenged – not the Sikh faith, nor the community.
The right response is the calm application of a law that already draws a necessary distinction between violence and non-violence, and not the diminishment of law-abiding Sikhs who have given this country, and many others, a great deal more than they have ever taken.
Swaran Singh was a commissioner for the Equality and Human Rights Commission, and is professor of social and community psychiatry at the University of Warwick and an NHS consultant psychiatrist.
Politics
F*** Messi
Irish comedian Tadgh Hickey has a simple message as the World Cup progresses in the US: “Fuck Messi”. The Israel-linked Argentinian football star has been silent on Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
Hickey posted a heart-breaking video to his YouTube channel. While Egypt’s football coach has spoken out against the silence of many clubs and stars on the genocide, Hickey added no comment to his post apart from the pithy title. None is needed for those who watch the chilling video to the end:
Fuck Messi.
Featured image via Twitter
By Skwawkbox
-
Fashion6 days agoLoro Piana Fall 2026 Enters Houston’s Art Scene
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Nutriplenish Leave-In Conditioner
-
Sports6 days ago2026 Genesis Scottish Open Thursday TV coverage: Round 1
-
Sports6 days agoSuper Eagles star Moses Simon opens up on Liverpool transfer regret
-
Tech6 days agoCharacter.AI enters the microdrama arena with its own productions, but there’s a twist
-
Politics11 hours agoYoung campaigners urge incoming PM to act on outdoor junk food ads
-
News Videos1 day agoXRP BOMBSHELL… XRP OMBOARDED FOR TRANSACTIONS!!!
-
Tech2 days agoGet Your ESP32 Sunny Side Up With This Solar Dev Board
-
Tech1 day agoDark Secrets Emerge When Jailbreaking LLMs
-
News Videos7 days agoCrypto Just Entered Its Most Important 6-Month Candle (Could Decide Everything!)
-
Sports1 hour agoNew Cornerback Enters Vikings Trade Rumor Mill
-
Tech6 days agoLevel Infinite Launches Gangstar Mirage City in India with Pre-Registrations
-
NewsBeat6 days agoMajor update after Huntingdon train attack as man enters plea
-
News Videos2 days agohow to make coin bank box with cardboard #scienceproject #money #diy #shorts
-
Entertainment6 hours agoDisney’s Most Ambitious Failed Star Wars Attraction Is Coming to SDCC
-
Tech2 days agoCloudflare Precursor Watches Your Mouse and Keyboard To Decide If You Are Human
-
Tech7 days agoEntra passkey enrollment vishing targets Microsoft 365 users
-
Entertainment4 hours agoVicki Gunvalson Defends Discussing Heather Dubrow’s Money
-
Crypto World7 days agoDeFi Dashboard Zapper to Shut Down After 7 Years
-
Crypto World1 day ago
Ripple, Coinbase, Circle Join Linux x402 Foundation to Help Shape AI Payments

You must be logged in to post a comment Login