Politics
Grammys 2026: 37 Most Memorable Awards Show Performances Ever
Each year, the Grammys gathers some of the biggest musicians in the world under one roof to find out whether they’ve been honoured with the industry’s most prestigious accolade.
For the rest of us, though, what gets us tuning in year after year are the show-stopping performances, with huge stars gracing the stage to deliver memorable, impactful and, at times, outrageous renditions of their big hits, in the hopes of being the stand-out star of the evening.
With countless offerings to choose from, we’ve put together a timeline of 37 incredible performances that have stuck with us over the decades, beginning back in the 1980s…
Whitney Houston – Saving All My Love For You (1986)
For a lot of people, this 1986 Grammys performance will have been their first time hearing the unmistakeable and incomparable live vocals of Whitney Houston.
While this is far from the most awe-inspiring performance she’d give in her lifetime, this Grammys rendition of the early hit Saving All My Love allowed Whitney to show off her amazing potential, and was undoubtedly a glimmer of the greatness that would follow later in her career.
Whitney Houston – I Will Always Love You (1994)
Fast-forward another eight years, and Whitney had become one of the biggest stars on the planet, and was riding a huge wave of success after her appearance in The Bodyguard.
By the time the Grammys rolled around in 1994 there was no escaping I Will Always Love You – which, to be fair, was also the case for many years afterwards.
However, even the song’s loudest critics can’t deny that there’s no beating Whitney’s song in its flawless live form.
Aretha Franklin – Nessun Dorma (1998)
The story goes that Luciano Pavarotti had initially been scheduled to perform at the 1998 Grammys, but pulled out at the last minute on doctors’ orders, leaving his friend Aretha Franklin to step in instead.
With limited time to rehearse, the soul singer completely floored everyone with her vocals on the night.
It’s a rendition that – at least on paper – shouldn’t work on any level, but who could honestly argue with that voice?
Madonna – Nothing Really Matters (1999)
Her performance in the film Evita, mixed with her game-changing Ray Of Light album, helped breathe new life into Madonna’s career after a string of projects that had been met with a lukewarm reception in the early 90s.
Ray Of Light went on to gain critical acclaim and huge chart success, but the cherry on top was the Queen of Pop finally winning her first ever Grammy, and delivering this stunning and surprisingly haunting performance on the same night.
Eminem and Elton John – Stan (2001)
A collaboration that no one saw coming, Eminem and Elton John made headlines the world over when the Your Song singer stepped in to replace Dido’s parts on the song Stan.
This performance was considered by many to be a response to critics who panned Eminem’s past homophobic lyrics, particularly as the two stood together in solidarity at the end.
However, almost 20 years later, the rapper was still receiving criticism for his use of anti-LGBTQ+ language in his music…
Christina Aguilera, Pink, Mya, Lil Kim, Missy Elliott and Patti LaBelle – Lady Marmalade (2002)
This Lady Marmalade performance allowed each of the track’s four performers to enjoy their time in the spotlight – complete with all the sequins, feathers and big hair it’s become synonymous with – before coming together as a four-piece.
As if there wasn’t enough talent on stage already, they were joined on stage first by its producer, Missy Elliott, and Lady Marmalade’s original performer, Patti LaBelle, who showed those younger viewers (and, indeed, artists) a thing or two about high notes.
Prince and Beyoncé – Purple Rain/Baby, I’m A Star/Let’s Go Crazy/Crazy In Love (2004)
We all know that when it came to rising stars and new talent, no one had a better eye than Prince. It’s no surprise, then, that right at the beginning of Beyoncé’s solo career, he chose her to perform with him at the Grammys.
And no, in case you’re wondering, this is not Beyoncé’s last appearance on this list…
Gorillaz, De La Soul and Madonna – Feel Good Inc/Hung Up (2006)
Listen, we all know Madonna is a great pop star, but it’s not unfair to say that her sense of humour is something she’s… less associated with.
So, it was so great to see her interacting with Gorillaz at the Grammys in 2006, first crashing their performance of Feel Good Inc before launching into an energetic version of her own hit, Hung Up.
The Chicks – Not Ready To Make Nice (2007)
It had been a tough time for The Chicks – then still known by their old moniker The Dixie Chicks – in the lead-up to their performance at the 2007 Grammys.
The group had been at the centre of controversy when they criticised then-president George W Bush over the Iraq war, leading to them being shunned by the country music scene and receiving abuse and even death threats.
Their defiant appearance at the 2007 Grammys saw them address the backlash head-on in Not Ready To Make Nice, and the group wound up becoming the night’s big winners, taking home all five of the awards they’d been nominated for, including “the big three”.
Amy Winehouse – You Know I’m No Good/Rehab (2008)
By the time Amy Winehouse’s Grammys performance came around, the sad truth was that while everyone was talking about her, it was rarely in conjunction with her songwriting talents or incomparable vocal abilities.
In fact, her Grammys performance was aired live over satellite link, as she wasn’t granted a visa to travel to the US for the ceremony.
Still, with this performance, she managed to silence all of her critics, and remind everyone why she had become one of the world’s most famous people in the first place.
Beyoncé and Tina Turner – Déjà Vu/What’s Love Got To Do With It/Proud Mary (2008)
And as if duetting with Prince wasn’t enough, four years later Beyoncé was tasked with introducing the legendary Tina Turner, only for the two of them to perform the classic Proud Mary together.
Tina looked totally thrilled to be sharing the stage with Beyoncé, while Queen Bey truly held her own next to one of her idols, while managing not to outshine her.
It was the stuff legendary duets are made of. Also… what a brilliant intro from Cher.
Lady Gaga and Elton John – Poker Face/Speechless/Your Song (2010)
Lady Gaga had already become the biggest pop star in the world when she made her Grammys debut, so the stakes were pretty high for her first ever performance at the ceremony.
Did she manage to pull it off? Well, let’s see, shall we?
Ridiculous OTT introduction? Check. Giant sets? Check. Multiple songs? Check. Amazing outfit? Check. Casually performing with a musical legend, proving just a couple of years into her career that they were already contemporaries? Check.
We’d say that’s an emphatic yes.
Pink – Glitter In The Air (2010)
Pink’s fans had long been aware of quite how much she put into her live performances prior to her solo appearance on the Grammys stage, but in 2010, she made sure the world knew about it.
Singing the haunting ballad, Glitter In The Air, Pink first walked out into the crowd, before performing aerial acrobatics while hanging from the ceiling and belting out the track.
Jennifer Hudson – I Will Always Love You (2012)
In her lifetime, Whitney performed at the Grammys on multiple occasions, each time bringing the house down with her powerhouse vocals.
Her death in 2012 came just 24 hours before that year’s ceremony, and it would have been remiss for organisers not to pull together a tribute.
It was decided that Jennifer Hudson was the star with the vocal capabilities of doing Whitney justice, and with less than a day to prepare, we can’t imagine how she could possibly have bettered this stirring performance.
Adele – Rolling In The Deep (2012)
Another performance that hits even harder when you know the context behind it, the Grammys in 2012 marked Adele’s first live performance after undergoing throat surgery.
The world hadn’t heard her sing in a long time, and fears began to rise about whether she’d ever be able to match her old vocal offerings.
Clearly, we needn’t have worried.
Beyoncé and Jay-Z – Drunk In Love (2014)
The music world was still reeling from the shock release of her self-titled visual album when Beyoncé took to the stage at the Grammys in 2014.
This time, she wasn’t there as a member of Destiny’s Child, she wasn’t promoting a song from a film, and she wasn’t anyone’s special guest.
She was standing on her own two feet, and it felt like after years of being one of the world’s most famous singers, she’d really cemented her place as a superstar.
Macklemore & Ryan Lewis, Mary Lambert, Trombone Shorty, Madonna and Queen Latifah – Same Love/Open Your Heart (2014)
At a time when the debate around equal marriage was still raging on in America, Macklemore decided to use his slot at the Grammys to make a bold statement.
Performing his song Same Love, 33 couples of all different genders and sexualities gathered to tie the knot there and then (with Queen Latifah officiating, natch), before Madonna appeared in full cowboy attire to sing Open Your Heart with a gospel choir.
While on paper it sounds like a clunky and even arguably insincere stunt, we struggle to hold back tears every time we re-watch this clip.
Sia – Chandelier (2015)
When you’re a singer who’s become known for never showing your face and standing in a corner when you perform live, how do you make an impact at a public spectacle like the Grammys?
You bring in Maddie Ziegler, Kristen Wiig, a load of wigs and what appears to be the set of an episode of Hoarders, of course.
Katy Perry – By The Grace Of God (2015)
Best known for her elaborate and cartoonish performance style, Katy Perry stripped it right back for her Grammys performance in 2015.
She performed the lesser-known ballad By The Grace Of God, which discusses overcoming the suicidal feelings she felt after the end of her marriage to Russell Brand.
The performance was in support of victims of domestic violence and sexual abuse, with a short message from Barack Obama in support of the #ItsOnUs campaign playing shortly beforehand.
Kendrick Lamar – The Blacker The Berry/Alright (2016)
And talking about making a statement on the Grammys stage… wow.
While that year’s decision to award Taylor Swift Album Of The Year over Kendrick Lamar may have been controversial in 2016, his was the performance that had everyone talking.
Just watch it to see what we mean.
Lady Gaga – Space Oddity/Changes/Ziggy Stardust/Suffragette City/Rebel Rebel/Fashion/Fame/Let’s Dance/Heroes (2016)
Lady Gaga managed to squeeze in a whopping 10 of David Bowie’s iconic hits into her tribute, a performance that divided opinion.
Some felt it reminded viewers of Bowie’s greatness and influence on pop music, while others – including the late musician’s son – were less impressed by the elaborate performance (and the fact it was so heavily sponsored by Intel).
Beyoncé – Love Drought/Sandcastles (2017)
Adele may have won the three biggest awards at the 2017 Grammys, but even she admitted that the night really belonged to Beyoncé.
Bey’s elaborate and beautiful rendition of Love Drought and Sandcastles came shortly after the news that she and husband Jay-Z were expecting twins, and her 10-minute performance celebrated motherhood, serving as the perfect closer to her stunning Lemonade era.
Adele – Fastlove (2017)
A year after a rather shaky version of All I Ask, Adele opened the 2017 Grammys with a flawless rendition of Hello. Sadly, her second performance of the night didn’t go quite as smoothly.
Having been chosen to pay tribute to George Michael with a rearranged version of Fastlove, Adele restarted the performance a minute in, declaring: “I’m sorry. I can’t do it again like last year.
“I’m sorry for swearing and sorry for starting again, can we please start it again? I’m sorry, I can’t mess this up for [George]. I’m sorry.”
Kesha, Andra Day, Bebe Rexha, Camila Cabello, Cyndi Lauper and Julia Michaels – Praying (2018)
At the 2018 Grammys, the Time’s Up movement was a major talking point, which the stars in attendance honoured by wearing black and holding white roses on the red carpet.
This emphasis on honouring the survivors of sexual abuse, particularly in the workplace, made Kesha’s stunning version of Praying – surrounded by other female singers – all the more striking.
Janelle Monáe – Make Me Feel/PYNK (2019)
Janelle Monáe’s 2018 album Dirty Computer was accompanied by a short film of the same name, which was brought to life on the Grammys stage the following year.
And while Janelle may have gone home empty-handed on the night, this performance – which included provocative choreography, homages to Prince and *those* vulva trousers – was undoubtedly a stand-out.
Cardi B – Money (2019)
This performance was pretty much everything we love about Cardi B. It was in-your-face, it was loud, it was confident, it was totally extra, it was brilliant.
No, we’re not 100% convinced there wasn’t a bit of *ahem* help in the ol’ vocal department, but who else in the industry right now is going to give us a perfectly-executed routine on top of a grand piano, before giving a shout out to her infant daughter and strutting about in a leopard-print peacock tail?
Ariana Grande – Imagine/My Favourite Things/7 Rings/Thank U, Next (2020)
A year after snubbing the Grammys due to a dispute with organisers, this performance served as a victory lap for Ariana Grande at the end of her hugely successful Thank U, Next era.
After delivering some powerful vocals on album cut Imagine (and a quick blast of My Favourite Things from The Sound Of Music), Ari served a quick costume change and brought the house down with renditions of her chart-topping tunes 7 Rings and Thank U, Next.
Side note… in what world has a vocalist as iconic as Ariana Grande only ever performed at the Grammys once?
Tyler, The Creator, Boyz II Men And Charlie Wilson – EARFQUAKE/NEW MAGIC WAND (2020)
Tyler, The Creator brought his unique brand of showmanship to the Grammys stage in 2020, the same year he’d take home his first award from the Music Academy.
Despite clocking in at under five minutes, Tyler took us on a wild ride with this performance, which included a Boyz II Men cameo, pyrotechnics, moshing and a whole lot of bowl cuts.
Demi Lovato – Anyone (2020)
This 2020 performance can’t have been an easy one for Demi Lovato.
Not only was it the first time they’d sung live in public since their near-fatal overdose two years earlier, they were also debuting a brand new song about their experiences written just days after they were hospitalised.
Accompanied by just a piano, the extremely personal lyrics really shone, and although the singer had to begin the number again near the beginning due to being too choked up, they ended up completely nailing their performance, and there wasn’t a dry eye in the house.
Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion – Body/Savage/WAP/Up (2021)
After dominating the charts with their number one song WAP in 2020, Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion were finally able to give their track the live debut it deserved at the following year’s Grammys.
The pair each performed a string of their solo hits on the night, but it was when they came together for an outrageous, raunchy and all-round WAP-tastic routine to their much-discussed collab that they really stole the show.
Taylor Swift – Cardigan/August/Willow (2021)
On a somewhat more subdued note, Taylor Swift brought her Folklore album to life when she created a whole world for her 2021 Grammys performance.
As well as performing tracks from Folklore and its follow-up Evermore, she also scooped Album Of The Year on the night, marking her third win in the prestigious category.
Harry Styles – Watermelon Sugar (2021)
Bare-chested and wrapped up in a feather boa, Harry Styles certainly got the Grammys off to a special start in 2021 when he opened the show with this performance.
Frankly, we’ve still not recovered.
Sam Smith and Kim Petras – Unholy (2023)
If you cast your mind back to some of Sam Smith’s more subdued awards show appearances in the early years of their career, there was no indication a few years later they’d be dominating the conversation with a Grammys performance complete with choreography, pyrotechnics and a whooole lot of backlash from conservative critics.
Sam and collaborator Kim Petras gave their chart-topping hit Unholy its inaugural live performance at the 2023 Grammys – and it’s fair to say it got a few people talking.
Miley Cyrus – Flowers (2024)
To say that Miley Cyrus played the long game when it came to waiting for a Grammy would be something of an understatement.
The former Disney star finally won her first Grammy in 2024 – a full 17 years after releasing her first single – so when the time came to perform she was ready.
First, she chastised the audience for not getting up and dancing with her (“why are you acting like you don’t know this song?” she demanded during the first chorus), and then jubilantly declared “I just won my first Grammy!” towards the end of the performance.
And the fact it was all done in Bob Mackie with some of the biggest hair to grace awards season in recent years was just the cherry on top.
Joni Mitchell – Both Sides Now (2024)
Despite being an 11-time Grammy recipient, Joni Mitchell had somehow never actually performed at the ceremony until as recently as 2024.
At 80 years old, Joni proved to everyone watching why she’s still considered such a legendary force within the music scene, with a star-studded backing band for this rendition of her signature tune, Both Sides Now.
Chappell Roan – Pink Pony Club (2025)
By the time her Grammys debut came around, Chappell Roan was already a household name on both sides of the Atlantic thanks to hits like Good Luck, Babe!, Hot To Go! and Red Wine Supernova.
For her first time on the Grammy stage, Chappell decided to bring her signature hit Pink Pony Club to life with a cowgirl-inspired performance complete with rodeo clowns, a full live band and, naturally, an enormous candy-coloured horse in the middle of the fun.
Sabrina Carpenter – Espresso / Please Please Please (2025)
If there’s one thing we’ve loved about Sabrina Carpenter’s ascent to global stardom it’s having a pop star with a sense of humour at the top of their game.
She showed this off to great effect with her Grammys debut, a farce-inspired routine that was a little bit Chicago, a little bit Goldie Hawn, a little bit Muppet Show, a little bit Betty Boop, a little bit Cher and a whole lot Sabrina Carpenter.
The 2026 Grammys will take place on Sunday 1 February, with performances from the likes of Sabrina Carpenter, Addison Rae, Olivia Dean and Pharrell Williams to look forward to.
Politics
Politics Home | Starmer Says Mandelson Betrayed The Country And Lied To Him About His Relationship With Epstein

Starmer said he regretted appointing Mandelson as the UK ambassador to the US (Alamy)
3 min read
Keir Starmer has accused Peter Mandelson of betraying the country and lying to Downing Street about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, as the Prime Minister comes under pressure over his initial decision to appoint Mandelson as US ambassador.
Speaking in PMQs on Wednesday, Starmer said he regretted appointing Mandelson as the UK ambassador to the US, and announced that he had agreed with the King to remove him from the Privy Council over the growing scandal surrounding his relationship with Epstein.
Starmer admitted to MPs that he was aware of Mandelson’s relationship with the paedophile financier when he appointed him as the UK’s ambassador in Washington, but said that Mandelson “lied” to him about the depth and extent of that relationship.
The PM sacked Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador in the US in September after more details about the nature of his relationship with Epstein emerged.
Starmer said that Mandelson had “completely misrepresented the extent of his relationship with Epstein and lied throughout the process”.
On Tuesday night, the Metropolitan Police confirmed it will investigate the former cabinet minister for misconduct in public office.
Earlier in the day, Mandelson, who was a key figure in the New Labour administrations of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, and has remained an influential figure in the Labour Party, said he would resign from the House of Lords amid growing outrage over his links to Epstein.
The government is also planning to use legislation to remove Mandelson’s peer title — an action which no UK government has taken since World War One.
It came after millions of court documents relating to Epstein were published by the US Department of Justice, revealing that Mandelson had shared confidential and high-level UK government information with him, including that the euro bailout was coming.
Speaking on Wednesday, Starmer said: “To learn that there was a cabinet minister leaking sensitive information at the height of the response to the 2008 crash is beyond infuriating.
“And I am as angry as the public and any member of this House. Mandelson betrayed our country, our Parliament, and my party.”
“Mr Speaker, he [Mandelson] lied repeatedly to my team when asked about his relationship with Epstein before and during his tenure as ambassador.
“I regret appointing him.
“If I knew then what I know now, he would never have been anywhere near government.”
On Tuesday, PoliticsHome reported that the Prime Minister was coming under growing pressure from Labour MPs to sack his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, over his key role in the original appointment of Mandelson as US ambassador.
Questioned by Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, the PM defended McSweeney, who is seen as the driving force of the Starmer project, and said he had confidence in him.
“Morgan McSweeney is an essential part of my team. He helped me change the Labour Party and win an election. Of course, I have confidence in him,” he said.
The Conservatives are calling on Starmer to publish all documents regarding the vetting of Mandelson ahead of his appointment as US ambassador. The PM has said that he intends to publish all relevant documents, apart from those that could undermine national security and international relations. MPs will vote on what should be published later on Wednesday.
The PM also said that the Metropolitan Police had been in touch “to raise issues about anything that would prejudice their investigations”.
“We’re in discussion with them about that, and I hope to be able to update the House,” he added.
Politics
Reform bigots can’t even vote correctly
Earlier this year, Suella Braverman and Robert Jenrick dramatically defected to Reform. Since then, not everything has gone to plan.
According to Politics UK, both Braverman and Jenrick accidentally voted WITH Labour to abolish the two cap-benefit cap last night on 3 January. This is a direct conflict with Reform’s party line.
🚨 NEW: Robert Jenrick and Suella Braverman accidentally voted with Labour to abolish the two-child benefit cap tonight after entering the wrong lobby pic.twitter.com/RsZSHsGfMV
— Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) February 3, 2026
Reform backed the wrong horses
Jenrick is the mastermind behind painting over a children’s mural in an asylum centre, so of course he found his political home with Reform. It’s the same with Braverman, who famously said that seeing a migrant plane take off to Rwanda was her “dream” and her “obsession.”
On 3 January, Nigel Farage announced that Reform would, unsurprisingly, vote against removing the two-child cap. And of course he did it with a pint in his hand:
If this doesn’t sum up Reform, I don’t know what does: kick millions of kids back into poverty (by reintroducing the two child benefit limit) so that a six quid pint of beer will reduce to £5.95…https://t.co/04sFXQthYZ
— Anne-Frances Hayes, Politics and all that. (@anne_staveley) February 3, 2026
As Alex Cocker wrote for the Canary:
Never a party to miss a vapid appeal to populism, Reform UK have announced plans to cut beer duty by 10%. Except, how do they plan to fund such a feat? Well, by reintroducing the two-child benefit cap, of course.
Under Reform’s new commitment, the party would gradually phase out business rates altogether for UK pubs. Incidentally, they’d also plunge around 350,000 children back into poverty, and 700,000 into deep poverty.
Despite Jenrick and Braverman enjoying cruelty, it appears they weren’t quite awake for last night’s vote on the two-child benefit cap.
Because they voted with Labour.
Ouch.
UPDATE: It’s been pointed out to me that because they went thru lobby the votes recorded. The record on HoC vote here. So Jenrick and Braverman voted WITH Labour to lift the two child benefit cap 🫣 https://t.co/SjVH1ZuGQ7 pic.twitter.com/R9p9DLYKXS
— Beth Rigby (@BethRigby) February 3, 2026
Farage looks like a fool
After Farage’s very public welcome to Jenrick and Braverman, this fuck up from the both of them makes him look a little silly.
I warmly welcome @SuellaBraverman to Reform UK! 🇬🇧 pic.twitter.com/eGZoK0SdKG
— Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) January 26, 2026
As Maddison Wheeldon wrote for the Canary:
this latest whiplash episode suggests that Farage likewise lacks any real vision or principle. But we already knew that.
Let’s see if Farage can at least get his MPs to vote with the party line next time, shall we?
Featured image via UK Government
Politics
Whoopi Goldberg Schools Elon Musk After He Slammed Lupita Nyong’o Odyssey Casting
Whoopi Goldberg has urged Elon Musk to “sit down” and stay out of “artistic” discussions, after the divisive X CEO’s recent comments about Lupita Nyong’o’s role in the new adaptation of The Odyssey.
Last week, speculation online suggested that Oscar winner Nyong’o would be playing Helen Of Troy in Christopher Nolan’s new film, which immediately sparked backlash from some more conservative critics.
Responding to one post which claimed Lupita playing the role would “ruin” The Odyssey and another describing this as an “insult” to the source text, Musk accused filmmaker Nolan of having “lost his integrity”.
This was then debated during Tuesday’s edition of The View, where moderator Goldberg made her feelings on the matter clear.
“Musk claims that Nolan has lost his integrity… ooh, you know… because Homer described this fictional character as fair-skinned, blonde, who was so beautiful that men started a war over her,” Goldberg said.
“I don’t know if you realise this, Lupita is also considered one of the world’s most beautiful women. So, I’m not sure what you’re trying to say.”
The Sister Act star then pointed out: “You don’t have to actually go to the movie. I don’t know why you feel like you need to speak on this. And I would suggest looking in a mirror, if you have any concerns about people’s looks, if this is where we’re going.”
She added: “And don’t try to clown me, baby! I know what I look like. There are so many things I want to say to you that are rude and awful. But I won’t do it. But know that I’m thinking it.”
After her fellow panellists expressed similar feelings about Musk’s comments, Goldberg concluded: “Elon, just sit down. For this, when it comes to artistic stuff, go sit down, please.”
During the conversation, Sara Haines indicated that Musk had “bigger fish to fry than characters in a movie”, following the news that X’s offices had been raided in France, with prosecutors claiming this was part of an investigation into potential criminal offences including complicity in the possession and distribution of “child pornography images,” personal rights violations through the generation of AI-generated sexual imagery, alleged fraudulent data extraction and the denial of “crimes against humanity”.
Musk claimed this was a “political attack” while an X spokesperson claimed the raid as an “abusive act” against the company.
Last week, leaked emails also appeared to show Musk enquiring about visits to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s island in the early 2010s.
Responding to the matter on X, Musk said: “If I actually wanted to spend my time partying with young women, it would be trivial for me to do so without the help of a creepy loser like Epstein and I would still have 99 per cent of my mind available to think about other things. But I don’t.”
Politics
Trump’s 2 Words To Sum Up Peter Mandelson’s Fall From Grace
Donald Trump has appeared to downplay former US ambassador Peter Mandelson’s fall from grace over his links to Jeffrey Epstein.
Mandelson served as the UK’s main link to the Trump administration for much of last year until he was sacked for his friendship with Epstein, the dead paedophile.
After the US Department of Justice released a fresh batch of files unveiling Epstein’s extensive network with the elite over the weekend, it was revealed that Mandelson may have been leaking confidential government information to the disgraced financier.
The peer quit the Labour Party on Sunday night and, after intense backlash, stood down from the House of Lords though his title technically remains.
When reminded by a reporter in the Oval office that Mandelson has been forced to resign over his links to Jeffrey Epstein, Trump replied: “I didn’t know about it. I really don’t know too much about it.
“I know who he is, but it’s… too bad.”
Trump previously claimed not to know who Mandelson was during his most recent state visit to the UK, back in autumn.
“I don’t know him, actually,” he said, at a joint press conference with Keir Starmer.
Asked if he was offended by that, Mandelson brushed it off. The former US ambassador told The Times this week: “He’s so clever.
“I mean, if he had defended me, that would have been embarrassing to the prime minister.
“If he had attacked me, it would have been hurtful to me.”
He also praised the US president in the interview, saying: “You may not like all of Trump’s decisions, but at least he is decisive.”
Trump welcomed Mandelson when he first started in the job a year ago, praising his “beautiful accent” in May and welcoming him into the Oval Office in early September, shortly before he was fired.
Politics
PMQs: Who’s Asking the Questions?
Johanna Baxter (Lab) Julie Minns (Lab) Kerry McCarthy (Lab) Charlie Dewhirst (Con) Luke Charters (Lab) Alex Baker (Lab) Jonathan Brash (Lab) Neil Hudson (Con) Alan Strickland (Lab) Helen Hayes (Lab) Layla Moran (LibDem) Ben Goldsborough (Lab) Christine Jardine (LibDem) Chris Coghlan (LibDem)
Politics
Is Lady Danbury Leaving Bridgerton? Producer Jess Brownell Speaks Out
Bridgerton showrunner Jess Brownell has a reassuring update for anyone worried about Lady Danbury’s future in the hit period drama.
After three seasons as Queen Charlotte’s right-hand woman in the popular Netflix series, Adjoa Andoh’s character has been seen in the latest run of episodes contemplating whether she wants more for herself.
After Lady Danbury’s declaration that she intends to step back from service, many fans have been concerned that this could mean Adjoa may not be appearing in the coming seasons of Bridgerton.
However, during a recent interview with Deadline, Bridgerton’s executive producer said she and her team have “no intentions” of that being the case.
“I want to say very clearly that we have no intentions of Adjoa stepping back,” she insisted. “She’s still absolutely a part of the story in season five.
She continued: “It was more about wanting to explore the dynamic between a friendship in which there’s a power imbalance, which is very on theme with this season, where we’re looking at the relationship between servants and their employers.”
She continued: “The Queen and Lady Danbury are real friends, but because of the power imbalance, it was interesting to explore what happens when Lady Danbury wants to do something for herself. It was an opportunity to explore new depth for their friendship.”
As Brownell stated, themes of power and class are being explored in all areas of Bridgerton season four, including its central love story between Luke Thompson and Yerin Ha’s characters.
Luke and Yerin recently explained how these divisions led to the setting of one of the stand-out steamy scenes between characters Benedict Bridgerton and Sophie Baek, who grow close after meeting at a masquerade ball early on in season four.

The first half of Bridgerton’s fourth season is currently streaming on Netflix, with part two following on Thursday 26 February.
Politics
Rafe Fletcher: Statist Singapore builds homes whilst statist Britain just plans
Rafe Fletcher is the founder of CWG and writes The Otium Den Substack
You can regularly eat and drink for free in Singapore.
Just turn up at one of the British property seminars that pepper the city’s function rooms. Developers and agents swallow the cost of a few freeloaders because it has been a fruitful market. Singaporeans are the second largest group of foreign home owners across England and Wales.
Demand isn’t spurred by colonial nostalgia. Rather, Singaporeans can buy a second home in Britain with far less hassle than in Singapore. And developers welcome the liquidity lacking in those supported only by a British-earned income. Just as a punitive tax regime leaves British buyers short of a deposit, so builders find construction can leave them short of a profit once they have navigated nebulous planning diktats.
Confronting the resulting housing bubble may look awkward for the Conservatives. Even in 2024, 37 percent of outright homeowners voted for them, a 12-point lead on Labour in second place. But the consequences of ducking the issues are starker. Those homeowners will see values deplete anyway under Labour’s trajectory of making everyone poorer. And the Conservatives will make no inroads with a generation shut out of the housing market.
It’s a lesser problem in Singapore where 90 per cent of citizens are homeowners. A product of mass public housebuilding under the Housing and Development Board (HDB). Only Singaporeans are eligible to buy these properties. Buyers draw upon their Central Provident Fund (CPF), a forced personal savings system to put down a deposit on HDBs’ subsidised values. Mortgages are offered with fixed interest rates of 2.6 per cent.
The HDB market is heavily restricted. They can’t be purchased by non-citizens and Singaporeans can only own one unit at a time. Re-sales are prohibited for five years, so there’s no “flipping” on the back of sudden value increases. If Singaporeans want to buy a second home, they must enter the fully private market, which constitutes just 20 per cent of the country’s housing stock. Doing so incurs 20 per cent stamp duty on any second property and 30% on additional ones after that.
Hence why buying in Britain is much more attractive where non-resident stamp duty is only two percent. With far lower tax rates and HDBs available at 3.8 times average income, Singaporeans have the means to buy British stock. Penalising such foreign buyers may play well optically. But as it is, they’re vital in getting homes built. Britain’s largest developer Barratt Redrow recently blamed a lack of them for missing its sales target. International capital helps developers meet affordable housing provisions under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act. Without buyers for higher-price units, the think-tank Onward reports that the cost of delivering new homes often exceeds their capital values.
Section 106 is one of many regulatory hurdles strangling supply. Onward’s research shows that small and medium-sized (SME) developers have been effectively priced out of the market. In the late 1980s, SMEs delivered about 40 per cent of new homes; by 2007, 30 per cent; and today just 12 per cent. They don’t have the scale or balance sheet to weather the costly and cumbersome planning permission process.
Mired in such regulation, Britain’s housing policy is hardly less statist than Singapore. But that statism resides in obstructiveness instead of forcefulness. Singapore can build because the state owns 90 per cent of the land (HDBs and most private housing are on 99-year leases). A situation engineered through the Land Acquisition Act of 1966 that empowers the government to buy any land it wishes at current market value. It is frustrating for golfers as the city-state’s few remaining courses are forcibly purchased to make way for new housing. But it gives the government total control over the supply-chain and costs.
A similar land grab is probably only contemplated by Zack Polanski in Britain. And it’s more likely to resemble Zimbabwe if it comes under the Greens. But there are other lessons Britain can learn from Singapore.
Firstly, provide tax-free incentives for young people to save for a house. Robert Colville writes in The Times that Brits with student loans are paying 50p in tax from every pound they earn over £50,000 and 71p over £100,000. Getting a deposit together is often hopeless for even top-earning graduates without help from the bank of mum and dad. Something like Singapore’s CPF would allow workers to save into a specific house-buying account. It need not be compulsory nor state managed. But it should be ring-fenced and explicitly linked to first-home purchase.
Secondly, remove uncertainty. Singapore’s Urban Redevelopment Authority fixes land use, density and infrastructure expectations in advance. Builders operate within known limits. They don’t have to contend with Section 106-esque regulations that leave developers unsure if local housing associations will even buy the affordable housing they’re obligated to provide. Get things built first.
Finally, Britain needs to stop concerning itself with fringe measures that play only to the politics of envy. I recently went to an event at the Seven Palms complex on Singapore’s Sentosa island, an enclave of wealthy foreigners. It had the ghostly feel of many of London’s high-end developments, with owners mostly in absentia. We may criticise the atmosphere created by such projects but they’re incidental to the wider problem. It’s virtue signalling rather than serious policy.
Britain’s housing crisis is not unique amongst developed nations. But alongside an acute supply shortage, it faces weakening demand. If the most talented young people don’t believe there’s a realistic route to buying, they will leave. And house prices will fall anyway while the country gets poorer. Fixing things now may unsettle Conservative voters who sit on high paper valuations. But a reckoning will come anyway. Perhaps those free evenings out in Singapore will start to dwindle.
Singapore shows the benefits of a government that acts forcefully. Britain shows the consequences of a government that meanders – forcing risk onto developers, disincentivising building and earning, and pandering to NIMBYism. Noel Skelton’s property-owning democracy was once an inspiration to a young Lee Kuan Yew.
The Conservatives need to reclaim that legacy to feed aspiration rather than resentment.
Politics
Why Cola Tastes Different In Glass Bottles
Did you know cola is made with a kola nut? The ingredient, which is from Africa, is where the fizzy drink gets its caffeine from.
Of course, some cola brands keep the other parts of their recipe top-secret. But why do beverages made by the same company seem to taste different in a glass bottle, can, and plastic bottle?
Well, according to Rowland King, a director at the glass bottles supplier, Quality Bottles, there’s real science behind the difference.
Why does cola taste different in a glass bottle vs a can or plastic bottle?
First, there’s the chemistry of each material to consider.
“Glass is chemically inert and non-porous, which means it doesn’t react with the drink or absorb flavour compounds,” King said.
“That helps keep the taste exactly as intended from the moment it’s filled to the moment it’s opened”.
Some experts think the polymer lining of tinned fizzy drinks can lead to a milder taste, while it’s possible that acetaldehyde in plastic bottles could affect the flavour.
And carbonation (bubbles) matter, too, King added.
“Fizzy drinks rely on dissolved CO₂ for their bite and freshness. Over time, plastic is slightly permeable to gas, even when sealed.
“Glass isn’t, so carbonation is typically retained more consistently, which can noticeably affect the taste and how it feels to drink.”
The screw or crown caps commonly used on glass bottles provide a tighter seal, too, allowing less CO2 to escape.
“Bottle shape also comes into it,” King continued.
“A narrow bottleneck concentrates aroma and slows down how quickly the drink hits the palate. That subtly changes the flavour perception compared to drinking from a wide can opening or pouring into a cup.”
Then, there’s temperature to consider
I personally love an ice-cold can of diet cola – sometimes called a “fridge cigarette” – because I feel like it stays cooler and crisper than plastic bottles.
But King explained, “Glass bottles are thicker and tend to chill more evenly and stay cold a bit longer once removed from the fridge. Since temperature strongly affects flavour perception, that alone can make the drink seem more refreshing.”
Of course, companies try their hardest to make their product taste as consistent as possible across a range of containers, King stated.
But, he ended, “material science is material science. The container does make a difference, especially with carbonated drinks”.
Politics
The House Article | Britain needs a National Pier Service to save our seaside heritage

Grade II-listed Southport Pier, the oldest iron pier in the country (Alamy)
3 min read
Britain’s piers are more than Victorian seaside relics – they define the British coast and the communities that depend on them, driving tourism and underpinning local economies.
Both of us represent constituencies — Worthing West and Southport — where the state of our piers is a huge talking point for constituents.
There are currently 60 operational piers in the UK, down from 150 in the early 20th century. Sadly, last week Storm Ingrid’s 60mph winds destroyed Teignmouth’s famous Grand Pier overnight.
Other British seaside piers face a growing political crisis, with about 20 per cent at risk of being lost due to rising costs, climate change and maintenance issues. Many MPs – us included – are calling for a ‘National Pier Service’ or ‘National Piers Trust’ to manage, preserve and regenerate many of these iconic structures, which are vital to local, seasonal economies.
The benefits of such a model include economies of scale. Centralising key functions such as procurement and maintenance through bulk purchasing and shared contracts, deploying specialist expertise via a dedicated national team, and pooling insurance risks for better terms would reduce expenses and improve quality.
Commercial branding, marketing and events would attract more visitors and generate higher revenues. Centralised training and workforce development would enhance service quality and safety while minimising duplication. Collectively, these efficiencies would make limited public and charitable funding stretch further, enabling the preservation and revitalisation of more piers without placing more strain on local councils and communities.
Southport Pier is the second longest in the country and has a proud history. It closed in 2022 due to its condition, but thanks to £20m funding from central government, the pier is due to be repaired and reopened in 2027.
Worthing’s Grade II-listed art deco pier is a much-loved feature of the town for residents and visitors alike and was named UK Pier of the Year in 2019. Opened in 1862 and reconstructed in 1887 to mark the Jubilee of Queen Victoria, it survived almost complete collapse due to storm damage in 1913 and a huge fire 20 years later that could be seen as far away as Beachy Head. More recently, storm damage caused the pier to be closed for almost three months at the end of last year, during which Beccy supported the borough council’s extensive restoration work.
This month we saw DCMS announce that £1.5bn will be invested in cultural organisations over the next five years to restore national pride. The funding will protect and restore more than 1,000 arts venues, museums, libraries and heritage buildings across the country. The investment will tackle urgent capital needs, preserve local heritage, and provide accessible, no- or low-cost cultural experiences for families. We are campaigning to ensure piers are part of the funding.
This Labour government’s core mission is a decade of renewal, and Britain’s iconic piers are a national symbol of our identity – after 14 years of Tory mismanagement, they should be treated as such.
Coastal towns have long been left behind through the austerity of consecutive Conservative governments, but Labour is now working to tackle regional inequality.
To combine the history and aesthetic of piers with a modern regeneration of coastal economies, let’s invest in rebuilding and refurbishing these iconic British monuments.
Dr Beccy Cooper is the Labour MP for Worthing West and Patrick Hurley is the Labour MP for Southport
Politics
What to know about Trump’s $12 billion critical minerals strategy | Energy Pod
What to know about Trump’s $12 billion critical minerals strategy | Energy Pod
lead image
-
Crypto World5 days agoSmart energy pays enters the US market, targeting scalable financial infrastructure
-
Crypto World6 days ago
Software stocks enter bear market on AI disruption fear with ServiceNow plunging 10%
-
Politics5 days agoWhy is the NHS registering babies as ‘theybies’?
-
Crypto World5 days agoAdam Back says Liquid BTC is collateralized after dashboard problem
-
Video1 day agoWhen Money Enters #motivation #mindset #selfimprovement
-
Tech4 hours agoWikipedia volunteers spent years cataloging AI tells. Now there’s a plugin to avoid them.
-
NewsBeat5 days agoDonald Trump Criticises Keir Starmer Over China Discussions
-
Politics2 days agoSky News Presenter Criticises Lord Mandelson As Greedy And Duplicitous
-
Crypto World4 days agoU.S. government enters partial shutdown, here’s how it impacts bitcoin and ether
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Sports4 days agoSinner battles Australian Open heat to enter last 16, injured Osaka pulls out
-
Crypto World4 days agoBitcoin Drops Below $80K, But New Buyers are Entering the Market
-
Crypto World2 days agoMarket Analysis: GBP/USD Retreats From Highs As EUR/GBP Enters Holding Pattern
-
Crypto World5 days agoKuCoin CEO on MiCA, Europe entering new era of compliance
-
Business5 days ago
Entergy declares quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share
-
Sports2 days agoShannon Birchard enters Canadian curling history with sixth Scotties title
-
NewsBeat1 day agoUS-brokered Russia-Ukraine talks are resuming this week
-
NewsBeat2 days agoGAME to close all standalone stores in the UK after it enters administration
-
Crypto World14 hours agoRussia’s Largest Bitcoin Miner BitRiver Enters Bankruptcy Proceedings: Report
-
Crypto World5 days agoWhy AI Agents Will Replace DeFi Dashboards
