Politics
Politics Home Article | NTS receives first order of revolutionary HALEU package
Nuclear Transport Solutions (NTS), the world’s leading nuclear transport specialists, has secured a Letter of Intent (LOI) from an international customer signalling their intention to purchase Pegasus packages for delivery by 2028.
Pegasus – NTS’s revolutionary transport package designed to safely move the next generation of nuclear fuel – has received significant interest, reflecting the global demand for advanced fuel logistics.
The LOI comes as NTS’s co-CEOs join government and industry leaders in South Korea as they promote NTS’s world-leading capabilities while strengthening collaboration across the emerging HALEU supply chain with government, utility, and industry representatives. It also signals the success of the Heads of Terms signing which took place in Washington DC in January, where NTS signed a landmark strategic agreement with Westinghouse.
Ben Whittard, NTS co-CEO, said: “HALEU development is progressing quickly, and international co-operation will be essential to ensure fuel, logistics, and capability scale together. This Letter of Intent demonstrates real confidence in Pegasus.”
Ciara Middlehurst, NTS co-CEO, added:“As advanced reactors move toward commercial deployment, secure and reliable transport becomes a critical enabler of the wider market. The emerging HALEU ecosystem depends on strong links between governments, industry, and operators across multiple regions.”
The Pegasus package is designed to support shipments, early fuel forms, and eventual commercial-scale movements for a wide range of HALEU fuel types. With international programmes accelerating, long-term alignment between deconversion, fabrication, and transport will be vital.
Experience gained through NTS’s established operations in Japan continues to inform regulatory planning and operational frameworks across East Asia, where cross-border fuel-cycle activity is expected to increase throughout the 2030s and 2040s.
Politics
Reform have got suspended racist still working for them
On 24 February, we reported that Reform UK had finally suspended activist Adam Mitula over his racist comments. Now, the Guardian is reporting that the far-right party are using Mitula as an election agent in the upcoming local elections. If you don’t know already, an election agent is the person who’s in charge of a campaign’s financial management.
Given that Mitula once downplayed the Holocaust numbers, we’re not sure he’s the man you want in charge of your figures.
Reform: Adam Mitula
Mitula’s racist comments were widely reported back in February:
🇬🇧 Reform UK has suspended a campaign manager after he said Polish victims of the Holocaust are used “to make up the number”.
Adam Mitula also used a racial slur in a separate post, which was subsequently reported by Hope not Hate.
Follow: @europa pic.twitter.com/9IcEs0XlAd
— Europa.com (@europa) February 24, 2026
Reform Tameside campaign manager Adam Mitula said: “I wouldn’t touch a Jewish woman” in an uncovered social media post👇 pic.twitter.com/6rcu8UfLc1
— Turn Left Media (@TurnLeftMediaUK) February 14, 2026
Mitula was the campaign manager for Matt Goodwin’s disastrous Gorton & Denton by-election run.
Manchester’s the Mill noted that Goodwin has actually surrounded himself with far-right activists. They argue that this is at odds with how Nigel Farage has historically operated:
Nigel Farage has always been at pains to distance his party from known far-right groups. He’s been publicly critical of Tommy Robinson on many occasions, and as UKIP leader he banned ex-British National Party members from running for his party.
Now, the Guardian have reported:
A notice of election document published last Thursday shows that Mitula is now the election agent for Reform candidates standing in three wards in the Tameside area: Aron Webb, Audra Murray and Daniel Bennett.
Neither Mitula nor Reform replied to the Guardian. Tameside Green Jackie Olden did, however, telling the paper:
Time and again, we have seen a pattern of commentary and behaviour from the Reform leadership that aims to normalise division in our communities.
Here in Tameside, residents have already seen the impact of that approach. In Gorton and Denton, Reform’s campaigning has too often relied on divisive messaging that alienates parts of our community.
Campaign of chaos
Are Reform really so low on viable operators that they’re having to rely on disgraced individuals like Mitula?
According to our local election reporting, yes – yes they are:
As bad as all the above candidates sound, it’s worth noting that most are still standing. And even if they do get suspended, there’s no reason to think they won’t rematerialise like Mitula.
If things get really bad for any of them, they can also just join Restore Britain – a breakaway party for the far-right’s most anti-social elements.
Featured image via Hope not Hate
Politics
Ceasefire? Israel is still killing Palestinians in Gaza
In yet another flagrant violation of ceasefire, Israel has killed at least six Palestinians and wounded others carrying out an airstrike targeted a police checkpoint at the entrance of al Bureij refugee camp, in Central Gaza.
What ceasefire?
Journalist Mohammad Sayyed was among those killed in the attack, which happened in the early hours of 11 April. Several of the injured were reported to be in a serious condition.
Throughout its genocide in Gaza, the Israeli occupation has systematically targeted Palestinian police across the strip, to intentionally cause the breakdown of law and order, and sow the seeds of chaos amongst the desperate population.
It is now six months since the so called “ceasefire agreement” was signed, in October 2025. But conditions on the ground do not, in any way, resemble that of a ceasefire. Palestinians in Gaza continue to experience extreme hunger, deprivation, injury, and death, because of the Israeli occupation’s ongoing aid restrictions, attacks, and movement restrictions. There is no sense of safety or stability, and recovery or reconstruction is non existent, as all necessary equipment has been blocked from entering Gaza.
Humanitarian organisations – Save the Children, Refugees International, Oxfam, the Norwegian Refugee Council, and the Danish Refugee Council, have produced a Scorecard, which assesses progress against Trump’s 20 point peace plan’s stated objectives and commitments.
Trump’s ceasefire deal has failed
According to Jeremy Konykndyk, president Refugees International said:
On matters of basic protection, rights, and aid for people living in Gaza, this deal has failed.
Save the Children’s Multimedia Manager, Shurouq, 31, lost her husband and her home during the genocide.
She says:
There is absolutely no ceasefire. We hear constant bombardment. Many of the explosions we hear are the Israeli military demolishing things, such as standing buildings beyond the yellow line, and within it.
The violence, killing, and indiscriminate airstrikes still take place each day. As of 3 April, more than 700 Palestinians, including at least 180 children have been killed since the so called ceasefire agreement in October 2025. 224 of these Palestinians have been killed near to the ‘yellow line,’ which ‘Israel’ continues to repeatedly shift.
Many hundreds of aid trucks have been blocked by “Israel” from entering the Strip. The Rafah and Jordan border crossings are still closed for aid, yet Trump’s ceasefire deal stated “immediately after the prisoner swap has taken place, aid will be distributed – without interference from either side – by the United Nations and the Red Crescent, along with other international organizations not associated with either Israel or Hamas. Entry of distribution and aid in the Gaza Strip will proceed without interference”.
Israel throttling aid
The population of Gaza is still struggling to survive, as almost all have lost their source of income, so are primarily reliant on humanitarian aid. But between 28 February and 8 April, less than 5000 aid trucks entered Gaza out of 23,400 that were planned.
Oxfam’s Ghada Al Haddad says:
There is not enough food to eat, and entire neighbourhoods still have no functioning water system because the equipment needed to repair them are not able to enter Gaza. The people are denied the basic tools for survival. Aid is blocked, repairs prevented, movement restricted, and the conditions of life continue to deteriorate, six months into this so called ceasefire. A large proportion of trucks entering Gaza do not even carry humanitarian aid, only commercial goods. These goods are expensive, and not accessible to the vast number of Palestinians, who have no money to spare.
At least 1.7 million people are still in displacement sites, many with deteriorating tents that are subject to flooding. This is be ause the entry of shelters into the enclave continues to be “heavily restricted“.
No major reconstruction equipment is allowed into the Strip either. So the piles of rubble remain. People are not only unable to clear space to try and rebuild their homes, but they are also unable to bury their dead still buried underneath the rubble.
When it comes to reconstruction efforts, none is occuring. All critical infrastructure has been intentionally targeted by the terrorist regime of “Israel”, but none has been rebuilt. Health facilities, water and power infrastructure all remains destroyed.
Trump can’t even deliver on aid
Dr Tanya Haj-Hassan is a paediatric intensive care, and humanitarian doctor who has worked extensively in Gaza. She was last there in February.
She says:
There is constant bombardment and constant drones. You get the sense that you are in the middle of a war zone, as you were before. The conditions of the ceasefire clearly are not being met.
Haj-Hassan claims patients are now dying of preventable things, because of the conditions brought about by the Israeli occupation, and its:
targeted and systematic destruction of the healthcare system- through the direct targeting of every hospital in the Gaza Strip, and the continued blockade of aid.
Lack of medical facilities and supplies, combined with the devastating and inhumane conditions experience by the population of Gaza, mean that medical evacuations from the Strip are necessary. But as part of its ongoing genocidal campaign against the Palestinians, “Israel” is obstructing patients from leaving abroad. Almost the entire population of Gaza remains trapped inside the Yellow Line, unable to return to their homes- if anything remains of them, and the majority of the Strip.
According to Konykndyk, humanitarian access should be the easiest part of Trump’s “ceasefire plan” to deliver on.
He says:
They are now trying to turn to much more political issues, such as disarmament and governance of Gaza, but it’s very hard to see how there can be any progress if they can’t deliver on the easiest elements.
These organisations recommend the following, to ensure a lasting ceasefire
The ceasefire must be in practice, not only in rhetoric
There must be an independent and transparent system to approve aid delivery – The Israeli occupation government cannot be allowed to dictate who and what enters and exits Gaza.
All border crossings into Gaza must be opened.
The new arbitrary restrictions the occupation has placed on International NGOs – which provide many of the basic services and are critical to the population – must be lifted.
Featured image via the author
Politics
Arsenal kit-man debacle spirals after open letter
Outraged political campaigner Andrew Feinstein has sent a damning letter to the CEO and co-chairperson of Arsenal over its decision to sack long-time employee Mark Bonnick.
The kit man was suspended and then dismissed in December 2024 for speaking out against the genocide in Gaza, signaling that undue repression of British citizens for challenging Israel is still going strong.
Justifying their disgusting decision, Arsenal bosses alleged that the ‘offending’ comments would bring the club into disrepute.
In stark contrast, Feinstein stated:
I would argue that to not speak out against these appalling crimes would bring any institution into disrepute.
After all, genocide scholars, the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court have declared that Israel’s acts against Palestinians are indeed genocide. These findings hardly come as a shock when Israeli officials have been stating their murderous intentions painfully clearly since October 7 2023.
An Open Letter to Arsenal Football Club about @Arsenal ‘s indefensible firing of a longtime, loyal employee because of his empathy for the Palestinian people pic.twitter.com/pX0FIlCPEv
— Andrew Feinstein (@andrewfeinstein) April 14, 2026
Andrew Feinstein: ‘I introduced the first ever motion on the Holocaust’
In Feinstein’s letter, addressed to Richard Garlick and Josh Kroenke, he affirmed his pride as a Jewish Arsenal fan and having been a “season ticket holder of almost twenty years”.
He also pointed out his wealth of knowledge and personal experience on the serious issue of genocide:
And as the son of a Holocaust survivor who lost dozens of her family mainly at Auschwitz where I have lectured on genocide prevention; as an author and expert on the global arms trade, conflict and genocide; and as a former ANC Member of Parliament serving under Nelson Mandela where I introduced the first ever motion on the Holocaust in the history of the South African Parliament.
Speaking to his “deep concern and outrage” at Bonnick’s sacking, Feinstein further highlighted why his comments were in no way antisemitic as was claimed:
Mark expressed views on the conflict in Gaza and Israel’s behaviour that are not inflammatory or offensive and certainly do not bring the club into disrepute. As an anti-racist who has experienced antisemitism personally, and having devoted my adult life to fighting all racism and discrimination, I do not believe anything Mark has said could be interpreted as an antisemitic trope or blood libel, except by those who will not tolerate any criticism of the state of Israel.
Crucially, Mark’s comments were made in the context of the world’s highest court, the International Court of Justice, determining that Israel was likely perpetrating a genocide in Gaza. This view is shared by 98% of human rights organisations, most human rights lawyers, relevant UN bodies and the vast majority of genocide experts, including a significant number of Israeli experts.
At this point, over 70,000 people have been slaughtered, over 70% of them women and children. Senior Israeli politicians and military leaders have been charged by the International Criminal Court with war crimes and genocide.
As Feinstein clearly explains to the pro-Israel football bosses, the Genocide Convention was created with international consensus in response to the “horrific tragedy of the Holocaust” to ensure that this immeasurable cruelty and violence could never repeat itself.
Referring to the term ‘never again’, he underscores how that applies to “all humanity, including Palestinians”.
Arsenal show double standards with invitation for Zionist influencer
Last year, Bonnick, 62, announced plans to sue the club for unfair dismissal and discrimination, according to reports. He was a committed employee at Arsenal football club for 22 years.
Bonnick’s dismissal exposes a sinister double standard at play in the decisions made by the club’s management. Just compare their treatment of Bonnick with their treatment of influencer Matthew ‘Papa’ Pincus. Pincus openly promotes pro-Zionist, pro-genocide views and is regularly present pitch-side.
The contrast is stark.
It’s clear that Bonnick felt compelled to speak out against the mass murder of Palestinians, like many across the country. But as we all know, anti-Zionism is not antisemitism. Feinstein, a Jewish man and the child of a Holocaust survivor, once again refuses to see ordinary people penalised for calling for justice.
He wrote:
The views expressed by Mark are, according to numerous polls, shared by a majority of people in Britain, including many Jews like me. The Jewish community does not think with one mind about this or any other issue. I understand that not all Arsenal supporters might share his views, but based on the above surveys, it is likely that a majority do.
In addition, like with the case of apartheid South Africa, there are certain humanitarian situations that compel people to speak out. This genocide, because of its scale, illegality and brutality, is undoubtedly one of them.
Hypocritical double standard exposed – now fix it!
Feinstein equally picked up on Arsenal’s gross double standard in his letter to the big bosses.
…it would be extremely hypocritical of the club to suggest an employee has no right to express a personal political view, when the club emblazoned the Ukrainian flag on the stadium scoreboard after the horrific, illegal Russian invasion. A number of high-profile employees, players no less, have historically expressed political views on their social media.
That a longtime, hardworking and loyal member of the Arsenal family can be dismissed so callously for expressing a point of view is not just shocking but is an insult to the values that have run through the club for generations.
He then finished with a final plea to Garlick and Kroenke:
I, and many others, are deeply disturbed by the club’s action.
I, therefore, call on you to reverse this decision.
At the Canary, we’ll be watching closely to see whether Arsenal choose to take any real remedial action or not.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Rachel Reeves Slams Trump Over ‘Folly’ Of Iran War
Rachel Reeves has slammed Donald Trump over the “folly” of starting a war against Iran as the division between the UK and the US deepens.
The chancellor told the Mirror newspaper she feels “very frustrated and angry” over the conflict, which continues to push energy bills up in the UK.
Reeves said: “This is a war that we did not start. It was a war that we did not want.
“I feel very frustrated and angry that the US went into this war without a clear exit plan, without a clear idea of what they were trying to achieve. And as a result the Strait of Hormuz is now blocked.”
Up until Trump and Israel decided to bomb Iran at the end of February, the Strait of Hormuz operated as a major shipping lane transporting a fifth of the world’s oil and natural gas supplies.
Iran retaliated by effectively closing the waterway and attacking any ships which passed through it, causing the wholesale cost of oil to soar.
Trump has since declared the US will start its own blockade of the Strait, although the the UK government has refused to send its own Navy to support that action.
Reeves also reiterated the UK’s decision not to support Trump’s offensives in the Middle East, saying: “We’re not getting involved in the US blockade, we don’t think that is the right approach.
“All the way through this conflict we have said de-escalate, de-escalate. The Conservatives and Reform – they both wanted to jump in feet first into this conflict and for us to play a part in active, aggressive, offensive action.”
“Obviously no sensible person is a supporter of the Iranian regime,” the chancellor continued.
“But to start a conflict without being clear what the objectives are and not being clear about how you are going to get out of it, I do think that is a folly and it is one that is affecting families here in the UK but also families in the US and around the world.
“I don’t think it was the right decision. But it was absolutely the right decision for Keir Starmer – our prime minister – to keep us out of this conflict.”
Reeves’ words come after the prime minister insisted once again that Britain will not be “dragged in” to the conflict.
The PM added: “We’re not supporting the blockade and all of the marshalling diplomatically, politically and capability – we do have mine-sweeping capability, I won’t go into operational matters, but we do have that capability – that’s all focused, from our point of view, on getting the strait fully open.”
The UK’s relationship with the US has declined over the course of the war, with Trump repeatedly attacking the prime minister over his decision not to initially allow US jets to launch bombing missions from RAF bases.
The president has said Starmer is “not Winston Churchill” and even compared him to Hitler-appeasing 1930s PM Neville Chamberlain.
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Green Party continue to surge in the polls
According to the latest poll from YouGov, the Green Party are in second place when it comes to the predicted seat count. Labour, meanwhile, have dropped to sixth:
‼️POLL | Reform lead by 5pts
➡️ Ref: 24% (=)
🔵 Con: 19% (=)
🟢 Grn: 18% (+2)
🔴 Lab: 17% (+1)
🟠 Lib: 13% (=)
⬛️ Res: 4% (=)
🟥 YP: 0% (-1)— Seats —
➡️ Ref: 282
🟢 Grn: 91
🔵 Con: 83
🟠 Lib: 81
🟡 SNP: 47
🔴 Lab: 34Poll: @YouGov, 12-13 Apr (+/- vs 7 Apr) pic.twitter.com/m0PQxoBh26
— Stats for Lefties 🍉🏳️⚧️ (@LeftieStats) April 14, 2026
This puts Labour below all of the major national parties; it also puts them below the Scotland-specific SNP.
The hard work of the thousands of Green Party members is paying off.
Every conversation we have makes a difference.
Lower Bills. Protect the NHS. Keep us out of US wars. https://t.co/VsT4LXJ8rp
— Zack Polanski (@ZackPolanski) April 14, 2026
New danger for Starmer’s Labour
The above polling is interesting for a few reasons.
Firstly, we’re now well past the point where Reform look capable of forming a majority government. At the same time, they would be placed to form a coalition with the Tories. This is something we all know they’d jump at given how many Tories they’ve accepted into the party.
Secondly, the centrist and left-leaning parties would fall short of being able to form a government even if the Greens, Lib Dems, SNP, and Labour joined forces. This is not good. It’s especially not good because despite the four parties’ seat share being below that of Reform and the Tories, their vote share is higher – i.e. more voters would have voted for them.
Thirdly, Your Party are on track to get three seats despite having less than 1% of the vote share. The three seats represent an increase of three despite their overall vote share dropping. Your Party have certainly had a chaotic fortnight with many members resigning in protest at the recent ‘purge’ motion, so it will be interesting to see how things look a week from now.
Fourthly, as ever, the above shows what a mess our current voting system is. Ideally, you’d want the number of seats to reflect each party’s vote share. Instead, we get stuff like the following:
- Only Reform sitting in a seat share position which matches their vote share.
- Reform on track to win close to half the seats despite only having 24% of the vote share.
- Restore getting zero seats despite having 4% of the vote share.
Ignoring all the above, it’s important to remember that polls are just a snapshot of the current moment. Things could change dramatically in a general election. And as we keep saying, it’s definitely the Green Party who have the momentum – not to mention the right answers to most of the days big questions (although we have criticised their stance on Zionism).
Reform UK do not have momentum.
The only party with momentum in the UK right now is the Green Party. https://t.co/wx92kcIIFf pic.twitter.com/FsDeLEigh8
— thelefttake (@thelefttake) April 14, 2026
Proportional Representation
Make Vote Matters write the following about proportional representation:
Proportional Representation is any voting system in which the share of seats a party wins matches the share of votes it receives. There are many different systems of Proportional Representation, but they all aim to make sure seats match votes.
The UK currently uses the primitive First Past the Post voting system – which causes severe problems for voters, our politics and our society. From its definition alone, it’s easy to see how Proportional Representation solves the problems of First Past the Post.
‘First Past the Post’ is how we ended up with a century of Conservative-Labour dominance. For the past forty years, this allowed the two parties to offer little besides reheated Thatchernomics, as they knew voters had nowhere else to go.
Make Votes Matter also said:
Proportional Representation (PR) could potentially revolutionize the UK’s political landscape by ensuring that each party’s share of seats in Parliament aligns more closely with the proportion of votes they receive nationwide. Under such a system, smaller parties would have a greater chance of representation, breaking the dominance of the two-party system.
This is outdated now, of course, because the two-party system has already broken down. Our voting system still needs to catch up, but voters just don’t care anymore.
They’re sick of the neoliberal Labour and Tories, and now they’re voting for whoever they like – voting system be damned.
Momentum
Looking at YouGov’s voting tracker, it isn’t the first time the Greens have polled higher than Labour:
The Greens overtaking Labour was unthinkable a year ago.
Now we know it’s possible, we need to think bigger.
Featured image via Stats for Lefties / Barold
Politics
Why did it take so long to shelve the rotten Chagos giveaway?
In October 2024, UK prime minister Keir Starmer agreed to hand the Chagos Islands to Mauritius – including the largest island, Diego Garcia, which hosts a joint US-UK military base. Eighteen months and a lot of criticism later, Starmer’s Chagos deal has finally been shelved.
While officials said the agreement had not been entirely abandoned, the government admitted on Monday that ‘the position of the United States president appears to have changed and this means in practical terms it has become impossible to agree [a deal]’.
It has looked for months as if the deal may be in the deep freeze. In January, President Trump branded it an ‘act of total weakness’. The following month, he urged Starmer not to ’give away Diego Garcia’. Giving away Diego Garcia, however, seems to have been something Starmer – together with his attorney general, Lord Hermer – had been extremely keen to do.
What I have called our ‘craven surrender’ over Chagos was for me the final straw that led to my resignation after 11 years as a British diplomat. The issue was the clearest indication of a pattern I saw repeatedly during my time in the Foreign Office, and which has become more pronounced under the Starmer administration: an unshakeable subservience to the most rigid interpretations of international law, and its elevation over a clear-sighted view of our national interest.
Chagos has become totemic because it illustrates the guiding principle of international law that energises our PM. The tenacity with which Starmer has pursued the giveaway of British territory, and the amount of political capital he has been willing to expend on the cause in the face of all criticism, has left many genuinely perplexed.
This is not, after all, a prime minister unaccustomed to u-turning. Yet on Chagos, it seemed as if nothing would stop him. Not the cost of leasing Diego Garcia back from Mauritius, estimated at anywhere between £10 billion and £50 billion. Not finding himself on the wrong side of the self-determination rights of the Chagossians. Not the fact that the one man he desperately needs to keep on side – Trump – came out against the deal. Not even the powerful environmental concerns around the possible destruction of a precious marine reserve should the deal enable Mauritius to commence commercial fishing. Despite everything, and through it all, Starmer tried to plough on.
As any student of international relations knows, international law is an amorphous thing. It’s less law as we understand it in the domestic sense, and more an evolving framework. A guidebook for responsible state action, if you will, rather than a hard-and-fast instruction booklet. But what is responsible about giving up sovereign territory to an ally of China, against the wishes of the historically displaced population and in a manner that would weaken the West’s precarious military defences at a time of rising geopolitical tensions?
The problem goes deeper than Starmer. The Foreign Office has, for many years, taken to heart American political scientist Joseph Nye’s observation that nations who disregard international law risk a ‘hypocritical’ foreign policy that diminishes their soft power. It is that maxim that explains our foreign-policy establishment’s decision to treat the 2019 International Court of Justice (ICJ) judgement as the beginning of the end of British sovereignty over Chagos, despite the ruling being only advisory, rather than binding.
As former head of the Foreign Office, Lord McDonald, said a few days ago, ‘There was a long discussion about whether we should play along [with the ICJ judgement]… in the end we decided to engage… Once you have decided to engage in a legal process, you can’t then walk away from it when you don’t like the result.’ While McDonald acknowledges that the judgement could theoretically have been ignored, it seems the Foreign Office decided that would have deviated too far from its modus operandi. ‘Everything that has happened now and also under the Conservative government as well as the Labour government is a consequence of that ICJ judgement’, said McDonald.
But why, unlike almost every serious thinker about geopolitics today, have Starmer, Hermer and the Foreign Office leadership not woken up to the fact that the ‘rules-based international order’ has ceased to exist, if indeed it ever did so? John Bew, the foreign-policy brain of the past four prime ministers, gets it. Writing recently, he pointed out that ‘the idea of a rules-based order is treated as an almost theological abstraction, as a God-given gift from which dissent cannot be contemplated’. To make ‘fidelity to international law the organising goal of our foreign policy and the premise of every decision we take’, he argues, means we risk being left as the only one with our pants down.
Rather than getting serious about investing in our military capabilities and holding on to prized assets like Diego Garcia, which will help us to navigate the dangerous world we face, Starmer has prioritised setting an empty moral example. It is less the ethical foreign policy expounded by Robin Cook nearly three decades ago, and more an exercise in virtue-signalling on the world stage. As Bew warns, the danger is that Britain ends up curating ‘an old system’ rather than becoming an active participant ‘in a new world in which power is being more nakedly asserted’.
Even Canadian PM Mark Carney, speaking at Davos in January, spoke of the end of this rules-based order. The former central banker invoked Václav Havel’s Soviet-era greengrocer who put up a ‘Workers of the world, unite!’ sign in his shop window not because he believed in it, but to signal compliance, and because everyone else does the same. To do so is to be ‘living within a lie’, Carney said. It is time, he declared, ‘for companies and countries to take their signs down’.
The irony of all this is that Britain’s wholesale abandonment of hard power has, in fact, undermined our soft power and the moral force of our example on the world stage. Diplomats from other nations’ foreign ministries I am in touch with are astonished and aghast at how weak and frankly naive UK foreign policy has become. At a time when we should be investing in warships and fortifying our bases, we’re invested in anti-colonialism dialogues and giving our bases away.
Even Joseph Nye himself, speaking at Chatham House back in 2011, acknowledged realism could not be wished away: ‘It would be nice to imagine a world in which it [international law] was applied equally and in all states. I don’t expect to see that world any time soon.’ And even Nye – who coined the term ‘soft power’ – was more clear-sighted than our prime minister about the limits to the role it could play in a nation’s overall foreign policy: ‘I’d hate to see Britain lose its capacity for hard power. You really need both, and the combination is what I call smart power.’
The Chagos surrender is thankfully dead, at least for now. But what the attempted giveaway reveals about Starmerism shows it’s anything but smart.
Ameer Kotecha is a former diplomat and now the CEO of the Centre for Government Reform.
Politics
Feminists for the ayatollah?, with Zoe Strimpel
The post Feminists for the ayatollah?, with Zoe Strimpel appeared first on spiked.
Politics
Barbie Ferreira Explains Why She Quit Euphoria Before Season 3
While the majority of Euphoria’s main cast members are present and correct in the show’s current third season, there are a few faces that you might have spotted are missing.
Among them is Barbie Ferreira, who played Kat Hernandez in the first two seasons of the award-winning drama, before deciding to step away from the show for its latest iteration.
Her exit was preceded by unconfirmed reports of a clash between the actor and Euphoria creator Sam Levison, although she later insisted that her departure was a mutual decision.
Speaking to Deadline in an interview published earlier this week, Barbie claimed: “What I wanted to do is act and be able to do different roles, and if Euphoria was going to serve that for me, I would have happily done it forever, however long it would have been.
“But it wasn’t really letting me show my range. In fact, it was kind of diminishing as time went on.”

She continued: “To me as an actor, what’s most important is the fact that I get to portray different roles and characters and learn about acting and filmmaking and getting characters with depth, which I think Kat definitely had season one, but I don’t think that was really the tea after that.
“So, it just felt like a very personal decision where I, really deep down, don’t care if what I’m doing is the biggest show of all time, as long as I’m creatively fulfilled.”
Barbie went on to say that because of her “diminishing” role on Euphoria, she felt that she might have been overlooked by certain “studios or bigger directors”, whereas the indie projects she’s been part of in recent history have allowed her to show different sides to herself.
“Obviously, I’m not on a show that is so talked about and famous and all these things, and that was really fun to do at the time,” she conceded. “But it just, for me, wasn’t worth it for my ambitions as an actress.”
During an interview on the podcast Not Skinny But Not Fat, Barbie also stated that it was more important to her to be challenged as a performer than just be on “the biggest TV show on Earth”.
“I would rather do an indie movie where I’m acting, I’m flexing my muscles, I’m being creatively asked to do things rather than sitting around to be a background character,” she admitted.
Last year, Barbie told the podcast The Viall Files that she and the team behind Euphoria reached the same conclusion that there was “nowhere to go” with her character in a future season.
“Instead of me kind of lingering around for nine months, I think it was best for both of us that we just ended it there,” she said.
“Of course it’s hard – I love Euphoria. I love Kat. Kat means the world to me. I spent so many years pouring everything into her, but it’s like, you don’t want to ruin a good thing.”
Barbie previously told The Armchair Expert: “I think there were places [Kat] could have gone [in future episdes of Euphoria]. I just don’t think it would have fit into the show.
“I don’t know if it was going to do her justice, and I think both parties knew that. I really wanted to be able to not be the fat best friend. I don’t want to play that, and I think they didn’t want that either.”
So far, the third – and, as it would appear, final – season of Euphoria has been met with a lukewarm response from critics.
In the four-year gap between seasons two and three, Sam Levison also helmed the TV series The Idol, which was similarly panned.
Politics
Politics Home | Asylum Reforms Could Put More Pressure On Mental Health Services, Home Office Warned

(Alamy)
4 min read
A group of charities and medical organisations has warned the Home Secretary that stricter rules for people claiming asylum in the UK could put “further pressure on over-stretched NHS mental health services”.
In a letter sent to Shabana Mahmood this week, Freedom from Torture, Médecins Sans Frontières UK, Doctors of the World UK, The Helen Bamber Foundation and the British Medical Association (BMA) warned that reducing the period of leave granted to recognised refugees in the UK would have an “unintended but undoubtedly harmful impact”.
It comes as the NHS continues to report record numbers of people contacting the service for mental health support.
The Home Office announced last year that refugee status would be temporary and subject to review every 30 months for all adults claiming asylum.
It was part of the Labour government’s broader efforts to deter illegal immigration, inspired by what Mahmood has described as the success of Denmark’s approach to reducing arrivals.
The government has also extended the automatic qualifying period for awarding Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) from five to 10 years.
Mahmood and supportive Labour MPs argue that reducing immigration is key to taking on Nigel Farage’s Reform UK and improving their party’s prospects at the next general election.
In a speech last month, the Home Secretary said that Britain is more attractive than other countries in Europe for those seeking refugee status, and warned her party that the system in its current form is “eroding trust” with the public.
“For those who come to this country and want to contribute to our national life, I am clear they should have a path to settlement and ultimately citizenship. But it is essential that the privilege of living in this country is earned, not automatic,” she said.
However, the changes have attracted criticism from other parts of the party, including former deputy leader Angela Rayner and shadow cabinet minister Emily Thornberry, who wrote in The House last week that reforms to IRL are “the opposite of fairness”. Over 100 Labour MPs signed a letter organised by backbencher Tony Vaughan expressing concern about the policy.
Now, a letter, sent by the coalition of organisations, seen by PoliticsHome, has warned that the proposals would “strip torture survivors and other refugees of long-term legal protection and the stability they need to recover from past traumas, leading to further, avoidable distress and mental health deterioration”.
Refugees often “fled serious trauma” and, as a result, “a sense of stability is crucial for their subsequent recovery”, it warned ministers.
“It will introduce major and prolonged uncertainty into the lives of already vulnerable and marginalised people, and cause a continual associated fear of having their status revoked and being returned to the hands of their persecutors.”
The letter also said that it is “unclear” whether the Home Office has the resources needed to implement the changes “efficiently, including conducting periodic reviews of refugees’ status”.
“For those who have lost so much during their flight from persecution, the anxiety that they will be unable to extend their leave can be terrifying, retraumatising, and can undermine progress towards recovery.”
“By introducing further instability into the lives of refugee patients, a reduced period of protection leave has the potential to increase mental health needs, which will only place further pressure on over-stretched NHS mental health and specialist trauma rehabilitation services,” it said.
A Home Office spokesperson told PoliticsHome: “Genuine refugees will find safety in Britain. Protection will be renewed for all those refugees who still face danger in their own country, but we must reduce incentives that draw people here at such scale, including those without a legitimate need for protection.
“So, once a refugee’s home is safe and they are able to return, they will be expected to do so.
“Refugees will also be able to obtain greater certainty about their future in the UK by switching into the Protection Work and Study route.”
Politics
Euphoria Creator Talks Sydney Sweeney’s Controversial Season 3 Scenes
Even if you’re not watching Euphoria, the chances are it won’t have passed you by that it recently returned for its third (and, quite probably, final) season after a four-year absence from our screens.
In the new instalments, much has already been made in the media of the fact that several of the show’s central female characters have pivoted to different forms of sex work in the time since we last saw them, most notably Sydney Sweeney’s Cassie.
Since the first episode of season three aired over the weekend, several outlets have been running pieces from viewers perturbed by scenes in episode one – and a teaser for the rest of the season – showing Cassie modelling for OnlyFans while posing in outfits intended to resemble a dog or a baby.
An opinion piece was published by Metro on Monday evening with a headline claiming that “Sydney Sweeney’s baby scene in Euphoria crosses the line”, while The Cut pondered: “Did we really need pup play on Euphoria?”
Other headlines quoted viewers who found the scenes varying levels of “disgusting”, “weird” and “disturbing”.
Euphoria creator Sam Levison teased what was in store for Sydney’s character ahead of the show’s season three premiere, telling The Hollywood Reporter: “She has got her dog house and her little dog ears and the nose, and that has its own humour.”
In his opinion, though, “what makes the scene is the fact that her housekeeper is the one filming it”.

DGP/imageSPACE/Shutterstock
“What we wanted to always find is the other layer of absurdity that we’re able to tie into it so that we’re not too inside of her fantasy or illusion,” he claimed. “The gag is to jump out, to break the wall.”
Levison added: “Some of these scenes we only lit with these ring lights that she would use
The Emmy nominee pointed out that Cassie’s ring light being the scene’s only light source had its own purpose.
“When you’re inside, it’s a beautiful, glowing front light,” he claimed. “But then you jump out of it and it’s just a pool of light and everything surrounding it is dark. It’s just gnarly and jarring.
“We wanted to capture what she’s trying to show the audience and be inside of it, but then also pull back wider and see how depressing it is.”
So far, Euphoria’s third season has received predominantly negative reviews, with many critics feeling the show has lost its way by aging up the characters we previously met as teenagers.
In between Euphoria’s second and third seasons, Sam Levison also helmed the TV series The Idol, which was similarly panned by critics.
-
Politics4 days agoUS brings back mandatory military draft registration
-
Sports4 days agoMan United discover Nico Schlotterbeck transfer fee as defender reaches Dortmund agreement
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Veronica Beard
-
Tech7 days agoHow Long Can You Drive With Expired Registration? What Florida Law Says
-
Politics4 days agoMalcolm In The Middle OG Turned Down ‘Buckets Of Money’ To Appear In Reboot
-
Politics2 days agoWorld Cup exit makes Italy enter crisis mode
-
Crypto World5 days agoCanary Capital Files SEC Registration for PEPE ETF
-
Business4 days agoTesla Model Y Tops China Auto Sales in March 2026 With 39,827 Registrations, Beating Cheaper EVs and Gas Cars
-
Fashion7 days agoLet’s Discuss: DEI in 2026
-
Crypto World19 hours agoThe SEC Conditionalises DeFi Platforms to Be Avoided for Broker Registration
-
Crypto World6 days agoBitcoin recovers as US and Iran Agree a Ceasefire Deal
-
Crypto World16 hours agoSEC Signals Exemption for Crypto Interfaces From Broker Registration
-
NewsBeat2 days agoPep Guardiola and Gary Neville agree over Arsenal title problem that benefits Man City
-
Business4 days agoOpenAI Halts Stargate UK Data Centre Project Over Energy Costs and Copyright Row
-
Business3 days agoIreland Fuel Protests Enter Day 5 as Blockades Spark Shortages and Government Prepares Support Package
-
Politics4 days agoLBC Presenter Mocks Trump Over Iran War Failures
-
Tech5 days agoA version of Windows 10 released a decade ago is now eligible for additional security patches
-
Crypto World4 days agoFederal judge blocks Arizona from bringing criminal charges against Kalshi
-
NewsBeat2 days agoJD Vance announces ‘no agreement’ with Iran over nuclear weapons fear
-
Business4 days agoIMF retains floor for precautionary balances at SDR 20 billion

You must be logged in to post a comment Login