Connect with us

Politics

House Of The Dragon Season 3 Finale’s Major Change From Book Explained

Published

on

House Of The Dragon Season 3 Finale's Major Change From Book Explained

This article contains major spoilers for the latest episode of House Of The Dragon.

House Of The Dragon showrunner Ryan Condal has opened up about the decision to deviate from the show’s source material in its latest season finale.

Monday’s instalment of the Game Of Thrones prequel saw Emma D’Arcy’s Rhaenyra Targaryen not just delivering a rousing speech to the masses of King’s Landing, but also revealing the Prince That Was Promised prophecy (and how it relates to her) out in the open.

None of this featured in author George R R Martin’s books, on which House Of The Dragon was based, which Condal spoke about at a press conference coinciding with the finale.

Advertisement

“It’s not in the book and it’s not in the history,” he explained (as reported by IGN). “But there is a bunch of talk about how Rhaenyra became very despotic and became a tyrant at the end and was very unpopular with the people.

“So we saw it as ‘this could just be something that happened and there was disagreement over exactly what it was’, so it didn’t make the historical record.”

He quipped: “But my glib sort of toss-off from the historians is, ‘Oh, well, Targaryens say crazy shit all the time’.”

Condal continued: “So much of [the Targaryens’ existence] is this self-aggrandisement. And for the stone masons standing there in the crowd just looking up at this, it could just sound like somebody trying to make something of themselves because they have no idea of all the ‘real history’ that went into Rhaenyra making that speech.

Advertisement

“But we wanted something that felt like a real seismic change, a sea change in Rhaenyra’s relationship to her people. She’s seen the death of their religious leader. She’s standing outside of the church of the faith of most of the people standing there, as a member of a totally different faith.

“This old Valyrian faith of dragons and fire gods and blood magic, and pronouncing herself the chosen one, the leader that is going to take them through the fire and out of the darkness.”

“And so tremendously, virtuosically performed by the great Emma D’Arcy,” he enthused.

Back in January, US broadcaster HBO confirmed that the upcoming fourth season of House Of The Dragon will be the show’s last.

Advertisement

Condal, according to Variety, told the press conference that he’d been “taking time off” from the fantasy world of Westeros while season three was airing, as he “needed to step away from all of this”.

However, he noted that he’s already handed a first draft of a new episode in to HBO, insisting: “We have an incredible season coming. As crazy and big as season three was, I think season four is going to be even bigger.”

All three seasons of House Of The Dragon are now streaming on Now, Sky and HBO Max in the UK.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Burnham’s latest cost of living plan is textbook tinkering around the edges

Published

on

Prime Minister Andy Burnham meets apprentices as he visits Submarine Academy for Skills and Knowledge (SASK) at BAE Systems, on July 30, 2026 in Barrow in Furness, United Kingdom. Both he and the apprentice are in workshop goggles.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham meets apprentices as he visits Submarine Academy for Skills and Knowledge (SASK) at BAE Systems, on July 30, 2026 in Barrow in Furness, United Kingdom. Both he and the apprentice are in workshop goggles.

Writing in the Guardian, Prime Minister Andy Burnham has released his latest plan for driving down the cost of living crisis. While the things he’s proposing aren’t objectionable, they are yet another example of tinkering around the edges.

Burnham reflects on modern life

Burnham’s piece opens as follows:

Advertisement

It’s remarkable how much of modern life can seem designed to wear us down. Every “sale” seems to come with an asterisk. Consumer contracts often find a way of costing more than you expected. And too many companies want you to sign up in seconds, but then make it feel impossible to leave. It’s exhausting.

They might not be the issues that keep you up at night. But they’re often the reason you go to bed ticked off. Westminster has got used to telling people that these everyday hassles are just part of life. The response has too often been a shrug of the shoulders or just calling it bad luck.

I don’t think that’s right. Because these everyday hassles affect millions of people. And they add up. Every single one is an unnecessary cost. And when the cost of living continues to weigh heavily on so many people’s lives, we need to be pulling every single lever we can to help ease that.

Burnham continues to make the same point for successive paragraphs, suggesting they didn’t have much meat on this bone.

The ‘cost-saving’ measures proposed

Our new prime minister isn’t wrong that these things are annoying, and he highlights the following issues specifically:

Advertisement

First, we are putting an end to phoney bargains. We are taking on poor practices that make people’s lives harder. If something is advertised as half price, it should actually be half price. We will make sure that when families snatch a deal, they can be confident they’re actually saving. That’s the least they deserve when budgets are so tight.

Second, we are making it as easy to leave a subscription as it is to join, and businesses won’t be able to renew a subscription without notifying you. New rules will come into force in January 2027, in time for when people often start new subscriptions, or cancel the ones they have, for the year ahead.

While the first is nice, it won’t necessarily save you any money. If companies can’t lie about how big a saving is, they will presumably just be honest about the percentage of the discount rather than knocking more money off.

The second is great for the many people who forget to cancel subscriptions. Given that there are numerous apps which cater to this audience, that’s presumably a decent number of people.

Every little helps?

Obviously these ideas won’t produce big savings, but Burnham argues his government will ‘pull every single lever we can’ to ease the cost of living crisis (also known as the ‘cost of greed’ crisis). According to him, this will all have a cumulative effect:

Advertisement

These are just a couple of our everyday fixes. There will be more to come over the next few months and bigger plans to make life easier and fairer for people over the longer term.

Each everyday fix will be designed to put a bit more money back into people’s pockets, to make daily life a little fairer and to give people a bit more hope that politics really can work for them again.

So on the one hand, Burnham is doing many little things which could save us small amounts of money in the future. On the other, he’s doing a number of big things which will make us much, much poorer in the long run. This latter category of decisions includes:

Easy wins

It seems likely that Burnham’s latest proposals will resonate with voters. Honestly, it says a lot about the state of recent governments that he has so many easy wins to choose from. His ideas won’t make a meaningful difference, though, and sooner or later voters are going to realise that.

Featured image via Christopher Furlong/ Getty Images

By Willem Moore

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Whoopi Goldberg Says Ghost Role Didn’t Come Easily

Published

on

Whoopi Goldberg in Sister Act

Between her work as an actor, comedian and presenter, Whoopi Goldberg is one of the most celebrated stars in Hollywood today – and she’s got the EGOT to prove it.

The “O” part of that coveted accolade came in the early 90s, when she picked up the Best Supporting Actress prize at the Oscars for her work in Ghost.

However, during an interview on the podcast Baby, This Is Keke Palmer, Whoopi opened up about how the role of conwoman-turned-psychic-medium Oda Mae Brown in the hit romance drama didn’t come easy.

Initially, she recalled that “every Black woman and their mama” had been called upon to audition for the role of Oda Mae but her, quipping: “They got women out the grave to come audition for this – and I hadn’t gotten a call.”

Advertisement

When she enquired with her agent as to why this was, her team claimed: “[We] suggested you [for the part]. They didn’t want you, because they felt people would take you out of the movie. I said how would I take them out of the movie? I don’t understand!”

Apparently, the film’s casting director had been advocating for Whoopi to land the part, and when Patrick Swayze was cast as Ghost’s leading man, he also said he wanted her to play Oda Mae.

Eventually, this was enough to get the film’s male lead and director on a plane to visit her in Alabama, where she was shooting Long Walk Home.

“Patrick and I hit it off right away, because he was just a really funny, wonderful man,” she recalled. “They literally flew in, we had some fun and did some improv, and the next day, they offered me the part.

Advertisement

“And [Patrick] kept saying, ‘why haven’t you called her? Did she turn it down? Did she not want to do it?’. And they finally had to say to him, ‘no, we thought it’d be too much, and [she would] just weigh [the film] down in a way we didn’t want’.”

Host Keke then suggested to Whoopi this was a case of her successfully “advocating for yourself”, after which the View panellist opened up about some more of her biggest roles – and how few of them were actually written with her in mind.

“They wrote [Sister Act] for Bette Midler,” Whoopi said. “That wasn’t mine. I was looking for work [and] apparently I’m Black! And I guess I didn’t realise it! So, every time I went looking for [a role] they were like, ‘oh, no, no, no, this isn’t for you’.

“So, I started saying to my agents, ‘give me all the stuff that people have turned down’. So, I got that Burglar that way, that was Bruce Willis’ movie. Jumpin’ Jack Flash was Shelley Long’s movie. There’s several! A whole bunch of movies! Because I felt like people really wanted to make those movies, and then the person they wanted said no. Let me see what I could do!”

Advertisement
Whoopi Goldberg in Sister Act
Whoopi Goldberg in Sister Act

Suzanne Hanover/Touchstone Pictures/THA/Shutterstock

“People 30 years ago or 40 years ago had a limited idea what could be done, and had a limited idea of what I could do, because clearly they hadn’t seen my show – so they didn’t know,” she continued.

“So, I did [those films]! And you know, listen, they didn’t always work at the box office. But when they got on television, people lost their minds. And that’s how a lot of my movies have become these kind of classics.”

Although these days, Whoopi’s time is often spent offering her hot takes on The View, she made a big return to the acting world in the 2020s.

Advertisement

Her recent credits have included the historical drama Till, the dramedy Ezra and the Western Outlaw Posse.

She also made a cameo in the 2023 musical The Color Purple, having previously starred as Celie Harris-Johnson in the 1985 original, earning her the first of her two Oscar nominations.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The Items Firefighters Say To Keep Off Windowsills In Summer

Published

on

The Items Firefighters Say To Keep Off Windowsills In Summer

Parts of the UK seem set for their fifth heatwave of the year, with no significant rainfall set to take place in parts of the south this month.

Claire Belcher, an Exeter University professor, told the BBC the risk of wildfires has “never been so high”. And firefighters warn that the risk of house fires rises in drier, sunnier conditions, too.

Speaking to the MK Citizen after a run of “near disasters” in Milton Keynes, a spokesperson for Bucks Fire and Rescue said: “As the bright weather continues, we’d like to remind everyone of an often unconsidered fire risk within homes.”

Watch out for glass items on windowsills

Advertisement

Multiple windowsill fires have broken out over the years due to glass items left in direct sunlight.

They’ve created blazes in places like Essex, Northamptonshire, Dorset and Wiltshire, Norfolk, Merseyside, Milton Keynes, and more.

The Bucks Fire and Rescue spokesperson said: “Recent incidents have highlighted that reflected sunlight can become concentrated enough to generate significant heat, resulting in marks, smouldering materials and, in some cases, fire.”

Which items should I keep out of sunlight?

Advertisement

Northamptonshire Fire and Rescue Service said to keep crystals; mirrors, especially magnifying ones; and glass ornaments off windowsills and out of direct sunlight in the summer.

The firefighters added you shouldn’t keep them near curtains or bedsheets in the heat either.

Other risky items include:

In general, Dorset and Wiltshire Fire and Rescue explained, any glass ornament or object that’s curved can work as a lens, intensifying the sun’s heat.

Advertisement

“The principle is the same as using a magnifying glass to start a fire. It does depend on the angle of the sun, but any mirror or glass ornament with a curve in it should never be left on a windowsill or by a window,” their site reads.

A Bucks Fire and Rescue spokesperson added: “If you notice a bright spot of reflected sunlight inside your home, move the object immediately or close curtains or blinds.

“Check around windows regularly to ensure decorative items are not creating focused beams of light.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Ex-Defence Secretary Fires Back After Zia Yusuf Dubs Former Tory MP ‘A Traitor To Britain’

Published

on

Ex-Defence Secretary Fires Back After Zia Yusuf Dubs Former Tory MP 'A Traitor To Britain'

Ben Wallace has hit back at Zia Yusuf after the Reform home affairs spokesperson called the ex-defence secretary a “traitor to Britain”.

Their social media row began when Wallace, who stood down as a Conservative MP in 2024, criticised Reform UK’s plan to fix the shortage of prison spaces by sending foreign criminals abroad.

The right-wing party has proposed deporting those with non-custodial sentences to their country of origin if they ever get into government.

Those with custodial sentences would either be forced to go home or to a third country, like El Salvador.

Advertisement

But Wallace, a former Tory cabinet minister, tore into the proposal while also accusing Yusuf of “making policy and facts up”.

He wrote on X: “If memory serves me right the top foreign nationalities in UK prisons are Irish, Polish, Romanian, Albanian and Baltics. Total number of foreign offenders always hovered around 10-11k.

“ Reform have to answer a.) how they will force those countries to take these offenders. For decades they have refused to.

“b.) If they won’t and then deport them but they are released how will that sit with their victims? And the Irish offenders will find it easy to return.”

Advertisement

Yusuf soon hit back by calling Wallace, who headed up the defence department for four years, a “moron”.

He wrote on X: “Incredible that this moron was defence secretary.

“Our policy today is in direct response to your government’s failures.

“If their home countries won’t take back, their citizens that are languishing in our jails, we are renting spaces in countries like El Salvador to put them.

Advertisement

“They will serve their full jail terms there, and will be banned from ever coming back to Britain.

“They may well include some of the thousands of Afghans you imported, including those who had not been vetted properly and including Taliban fighters (!).

“You know, the ones you took a super injunction out to keep secret from the British people? That’s why I call you a traitor to Britain. You fit the dictionary definition.”

But Wallace hit back: “Oh look a lesson from a man who never put a uniform on…just worked at bank.

Advertisement

“A man who is literally making policy and facts up.

“A man who cant even get his own party to pick him as an MP ( tell us why please?).

“When Reform stop taking £5m bungs and start being honest with people then people might take you seriously.

“No one is saying don’t send prisoners back when you can but don’t lie to the public you can do it with a magic wand. You guys are getting desperate. After all you recruited Suella!”

Advertisement

Suella Braverman worked in the Tory cabinet at the same time as Wallace but defected to Reform earlier this year.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

UEFA considers probe into ex-gen sec Infantino for relationship scandal

Published

on

Infantino

Gianni Infantino speaks to press holding microphones at a press conference situation

FIFA president Gianni Infantino is facing a new crisis that could lead to a fresh investigation into his conduct during the 16 years he spent at UEFA, amid allegations concerning an alleged relationship with a former employee, who received a six-figure financial settlement.

The Telegraph has revealed how prominent figures within UEFA want to know whether the alleged relationship influenced decisions relating to the employee or others during Infantino’s tenure as general secretary.

UEFA circa Infantino: A brief history

Infantino joined UEFA in 2000 and rose through the ranks before taking up the post of general secretary. He stayed at UEFA until 2016, when he became FIFA president, succeeding Joseph Blatter.

When at UEFA, it was reported that a female employee started out in an entry-level role before quickly moving into a more lucrative managerial position. She allegedly received a pay rise of about 30%, which caused discontent within the organisation, according to sources quoted by the Telegraph.

Advertisement

Apparently, Infantino was not supposed to approve the staff member’s severance package due to an alleged conflict of interest.

Meanwhile, sources indicated that Michel Platini, who was head of UEFA at the time, confronted Infantino over the alleged relationship, before an agreement was reached about the staff member’s departure and financial compensation.

The information also revealed that once the employee left, UEFA financially supported her Master’s degree in business administration.

Platini declined to comment to the Telegraph.

Advertisement

UEFA defends itself, FIFA denies allegations

For its part, UEFA confirmed that the sum received by the employee was “in line with the regulations in force” at the time, noting that the organisation had subsequently tightened its rules regarding staff and remuneration policies, in line with modern standards for international organisations.

However, FIFA described the allegations levelled at its president, calling them “categorically untrue” and said any suggestion of inappropriate behaviour or a breach of regulations constitutes defamation. The football body also confirmed it had not received any complaints from staff at UEFA or FIFA regarding Infantino’s conduct.

FIFA emphasised that all measures relating to staff, including severance packages and compensation, had been approved by the relevant officials in accordance with the regulations in force at the time.

In a further escalation, FIFA has accused certain parties of launching a “coordinated and sustained effort” aimed at undermining the organisation and Infantino.

Advertisement

Things keep getting worse for Gianni

This issue comes at an extremely sensitive time for Infantino. He is facing one of his biggest political crises since taking over as FIFA president, against the backdrop of an escalating dispute with UEFA over a proposed plan to finance the World Cup, which would have granted a group of investors extensive influence over the tournament’s commercial interests.

UEFA had announced that it lost confidence in Infantino, while the European football associations voted unanimously to boycott the upcoming World Cup, pending assurances that the controversial funding plan had been definitively scrapped.

This crisis coincided with other controversies surrounding Infantino’s presidency, including the row over the high ticket prices for World Cup matches, as well as the infamous U-turn of US striker Fularin Balogun’s suspension, following intervention from President Donald Trump.

However, despite mounting pressure, Infantino remains determined to stand in the FIFA presidential election scheduled for next March, in a bid to secure a fourth and final term.

Advertisement

In North and Central America and the Caribbean, the CONCACAF federations have joined UEFA in criticising the funding plan, whilst Mexico has broken ranks with the majority and announced its support for Infantino — a move that has raised questions, particularly as the country is bidding to host the Club World Cup in 2029.

Featured image via the Canary

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

What are the legal implications of the mass border crossing in Ceuta?

Published

on

What are the legal implications of the mass border crossing in Ceuta?

Carherine Barnard considers three legal issues which have arisen as a result of the mass border crossing from Morocco to the Spanish territory of Ceuta in July.

Spain and the EU were caught off guard when, on 30 July 2026, tens of thousands of people crossed the border between Morocco and the Spanish territory of Ceuta. Migrants came on foot or they swam. Over 100 migrants died in the attempt. Government responses were instant – and nationalistic. Spain, facing an incursion into its territory, sent in police and military reinforcements. Within 48 hours the vast majority of migrants had returned to Morocco. Nevertheless, Italy said that Spain should be removed from Schengen, the borderless travel area in the EU, and when that proved not possible, it imposed travel restrictions on those coming from Spain. Denmark and Finland threatened to do the same.

The aim of this blog is to focus on three legal issues which have arisen as a result of this mass border crossing.

First, the immediate Italian response. Under the Schengen rules, it’s not possible to remove another state from the Schengen zone. All states can do in times of crisis is to impose temporary measures. For example, under Article 25 of the Schengen Borders Code (SBC), where ‘there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security in a Member State’, that state may ‘exceptionally reintroduce border control’ for a limited period of up to 30 days, possibly longer, depending on the foreseeable duration of the serious threat. Further, the reintroduction of border control must be proportionate (i.e. it shall ‘not exceed what is strictly necessary to respond to the serious threat’) and must be ‘a last resort’. There are also various procedural requirements to be satisfied, including notification to the other member states and the Commission. It is not clear that any of the Article 25 criteria have been satisfied.

Advertisement

Moreover, those who entered Ceuta did not enter the Schengen borderless travel zone. Article 41 of the SBC makes specific – and unique – provision for Ceuta and Melilla (another Spanish territory in north Africa). As the Spanish government explains, ‘Schengen checks are carried out on exit by sea or air, the only two routes available. Therefore, no one can travel from Ceuta or Melilla to mainland Spain without being identified by the National Police at the port or the airport.’

Nevertheless, Italy has continued to impose border controls against Spain and now Spain has retaliated by introducing reciprocal controls on arrivals from Italy, again with little evidence of the terms of Article 25 being respected. Where is the European Commission, the guardian of the treaties, in all of this? The response ‘it’s August’ does not suggest a Commission fulfilling its legal duties.

Second, the attitude of Italy, Finland and Denmark to the Ceuta situation and the Spanish response raises a further issue: EU solidarity – or rather lack of it – in the face of a crisis. The principle of solidarity between the EU and member states runs through the EU treaties like writing through a stick of rock (see e.g. Article 24(2) of the Treaty on European Union: ‘the Union shall conduct, define and implement a common foreign and security policy, based on the development of mutual political solidarity among Member States … and the achievement of an ever-increasing degree of convergence of Member States’ actions’).

Yet the initial response from the Commission, condemning as ‘unacceptable’ the images coming from Ceuta, offered little signs of solidarity with Spain. Meanwhile, a letter, initiated by Italy and Denmark but signed by 22 member states, blamed Spain for the crisis due to its amnesty policy. Spain has recently offered amnesty to over 500,000 illegal residents. This gives them the right to reside, but not citizenship, but they had to have arrived in Spain before 1 January 2026.

Advertisement

Spain responded robustly, lamenting the lack of EU solidarity. An emergency meeting of interior and justice ministers hosted by the Commission and the Irish Presidency on 4 August tried to restore some degree of unity. The current spat between Spain and Italy over the SBC and the lack of Commission response suggests the continued lack of solidarity.

Third, there was another dog that didn’t bark: the new EU migration pact, in force on 1 July 2026, described as an ‘Effective system of solidarity and responsibility for managing asylum and migration in the EU’. The Pact contains a new Crisis and force majeure Regulation which ‘addresses situations of crisis, including instrumentalisation, and force majeure, and provides for derogations and solidarity measures for Member States’. This Regulation was introduced following the instrumentalisation of migration by Belarus against Poland, Lithuania and Latvia in 2021 when it sent thousands of mainly Iraqis to the Polish border with the ‘false promise of easy entry to the EU’. Some argue that the recent incursion into Ceuta was prompted by the Moroccan government using migration as a way of putting pressure on Spain after Pedro Sanchez, the Spanish Prime Minister, following a thawing of Spanish-Algerian relations.

Yet Spain does not appear to have made, as the new Regulation allows for, ‘a reasoned request to the Commission, in order to benefit from solidarity measures allowing for the proper management of that situation’. Nor does the Commission appear to have considered the application of the regulation. As Alberto Alemanno suggests, because Spain needs the cooperation of Morocco for managing its border, pulling the trigger of the regulation may have been too politically toxic. But this undermines the utility of a key pillar of the EU’s flagship migration programme.

All of this continues to be highly relevant. There are rumours that people smugglers are going to try another attempt on the Morocco/Ceuta border on 15 August. Spain has already lamented how smugglers have used social media to take advantage of (and provide misinformation about), Spain’s relatively liberal immigration laws, including a ruling of the Supreme Court which prohibited ‘hot returns’ to Morocco (ie returns without legal process)  for those arriving in Ceuta by swimming (they can still be returned after due process).

Advertisement

Spain’s border with Morocco thus looks set to remain a sensitive issue. The divided response by the EU and the member states helps those trying gain access to the EU illegally and strengthens the hand of those wishing to instrumentalise migration.

By Professor Catherine Barnard, Senior Fellow, UK in a Changing Europe & Professor of EU Law and Employment Law, University of Cambridge

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

What Is The Difference Between Sweet Potatoes And Yams? We Explain The Key Distinctions

Published

on

What's The Difference Between Sweet Potatoes And Yams?

Maybe it’s part of the current 2016 nostalgia, but I’ve been seeing a lot more sweet potato content recently.

There’s the classic orange fare, this time caramelised to crispy perfection – but in 2026, Japanese sweet potatoes (perfect for dessert) are all over my feed as well.

So, too, is the increasingly popular ube, a yam key to Filipino cuisine. It’s also sometimes called a “purple yam”, “water yam”, or “violet yam”.

But what’s the difference between a sweet potato and a yam to begin with?

Advertisement

Sweet potatoes vs yams: differences explained

1) They’re from different families

Sweet potatoes – which aren’t actually that closely related to “normal” spuds – are from the Convolvulaceae family, while yams belong to the Dioscoreaceae family.

Yams are quite closely related to lilies and grasses.

Advertisement

2) They’re different parts of their respective plants

Yams are tubers, while sweet potatoes are technically roots.

3) They can look very different

Sweet potatoes usually have thin, papery skin and a yellow or orange-ish inside. Sometimes they can have purple flesh too.

Advertisement

Yams have tougher, more “scaly” skin and can weigh as much as 45kg in extreme cases. They’re more cylindrical and sometimes have protrusions called “toes”.

4) They’re often grown in different places

Yams are common in parts of Africa and Asia, with about 95% of the plants being grown in Africa. It can be hard to find true yams in mainstream Western supermarkets.

Sweet potatoes are predominantly grown in China, India, and some African countries. They’re native to Central and South America and are more common in Western stores.

Advertisement

5) They taste different

Yams are starchier and “not nearly as sweet as sweet potatoes,” America’s Test Kitchen said.

Sweet potatoes’ flesh is softer and fluffier when cooked, meanwhile, and can be creamier and more moist than yams.

6) They’re nutritionally different

Advertisement

Sweet potatoes have ever so slightly more protein than yams, while yams are considerably higher in carbohydrates.

Yams have slightly more vitamin C, potassium, vitamin B6, and iron, while sweet potatoes are higher in sugars, fat (though neither has much at all), beta-carotene, and calcium.

But, Healthline notes, both are rich in nutrients, fibre, and vitamins.

7) They’re cooked differently

Advertisement

Usually, yams are boiled, roasted, or fried.

Sweet potatoes are often baked, roasted, fried, pureed, or mashed.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Farage Admits Small Boat Crossings Drop Despite Out Of Control Claims

Published

on

Farage Admits Small Boat Crossings Drop Despite Out Of Control Claims

Nigel Farage has admitted that the number of small boats coming across the English Channel is falling – but still insisted the migrant crisis is “completely out of control”.

The Reform UK leader vowed last week to use the British Royal Navy to return small boats to France if his party ever got into power.

This proposal triggered a row with the French authorities who called it a breach of international and maritime law.

The number of crossings has fallen this year overall, but the controversial topic resurfaced this week after a record 230 people arrived in the UK on just one large dinghy.

Advertisement

Farage said Britain is evidently heading towards the kind of migrant crisis seen in the Mediterranean during a press conference on Monday.

But, Sky News reporter Rob Powell hit back: “Yes this is the largest number of people arriving in one boat but overall numbers are down quite significantly, 42% down on last year.”

He asked if Farage would acknowledge numbers are falling, adding: “Are you being straight with the British public when you suggest this is an issue that is getting worse?”

The Reform leader replied insisting he “always” thought the boats would get bigger.

Advertisement

“The overall numbers are down,” he admitted. “But they’re still horrendous.”

“Whether we have fewer bad people thus far than last year, the situation is desperate, it should be declared a national security emergency,” Farage said.

“Yes, we have managed to stop some of the dinghies.

“But it doesn’t stop the problem. It doesn’t go away. It is completely out of control.”

Advertisement

He added: “The idea that we should be celebrating that numbers are not as extreme as they were is for the birds.”

Responding to concerns over the mega-dingy, prime minister’s spokesperson told reporters on Monday: “We’ve seen today some appalling images of young babies being put into these unseaworthy craft, and they’re shocking images, and they show the reality behind the ruthless smuggling gangs that are prepared to risk human lives for profit.

“That’s exactly why the government has signed a new payment-by-results deal with the French to prevent these perilous journeys from happening in the first place.”

He said the government was “not complacent” and noted how joint action with the French since the general election had prevented 47,000 crossings.

Advertisement

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

How To Save Your Sex Life When You Have A ‘Dead Bedroom’

Published

on

“One of our biggest mistakes was pretending everything was fine for far too long,” said Lisa Opel, a sex educator.

A “dead bedroom” sounds final. Case closed – or in this case, the bedroom door closed to a cold bed. For many couples, a prolonged period without sex can feel like the beginning of the end.

“A difficult sexual phase can expose things a couple has avoided: resentment, loneliness, fear of rejection, body insecurity, different needs or the sheer impact of everyday life,” said Lisa Opel, the in-house sex educator at JOYclub. “That can be painful, but being able to see the problem also creates the possibility of responding to it.”

Opel, who once navigated a dead bedroom in her own marriage, said rebuilding a sex life does not necessarily mean returning to the way things were before.

“Bodies change, people change and relationships change. The goal may be to create a new form of intimacy that is more honest and better suited to who you are now,” she said.

Advertisement
“One of our biggest mistakes was pretending everything was fine for far too long,” said Lisa Opel, a sex educator.

skynesher via Getty Images

“One of our biggest mistakes was pretending everything was fine for far too long,” said Lisa Opel, a sex educator.

Kiki Maree, a queer-inclusive somatic sexologist and intimacy educator, doesn’t use the phrase “dead bedroom” in her work because “I think it can feel quite hopeless and often misses what’s actually happening underneath. I prefer to think about it as a period of sexual disconnection.”

Maree has also experienced sexual disconnection with her partner, “but the relationship itself was never ‘dead.’”

“There was still love, care and commitment,” Maree said. “What had become difficult was the pathway back to intimacy.”

Both experts say finding their way back wasn’t about forcing desire or chasing a perfect solution. Instead, it required understanding what had created the distance in the first place, and learning how to reconnect with their partners without blame, pressure or expectations.

Advertisement

They stopped pretending nothing was wrong.

For Opel, one of the biggest obstacles wasn’t a lack of sex – it was the lack of talking about sex.

“One of our biggest mistakes was pretending everything was fine for far too long,” she said. “I think I was scared that saying, ‘I don’t really want sex anymore’ might break something, so instead I said nothing and hoped the problem would sort itself out.”

Instead, the silence gave hurt, confusion and feelings of rejection more room to grow until the lack of intimacy became “a large, silent third person in the relationship,” she said.

Advertisement

What helped was finally talking about it.

“Then, once we finally started talking, we made the very human mistake of hoping there might be one conversation, one technique or one gloriously sexy breakthrough that would fix the whole thing. There wasn’t,” Opel said.

“Rebuilding intimacy was much less cinematic: lots of talking, trying something, realizing it did not work, talking again and slowly becoming more honest.”

They realised neither partner was the problem.

Advertisement

Both experts say one of the biggest mindset shifts was moving away from blame and toward curiosity. For Maree, that meant recognising that both partners were often suffering in different ways.

“One partner often feels rejected, lonely or undesirable, while the other often feels pressure, guilt or like they’re constantly letting the relationship down,” she said. “Once we stopped seeing each other as the problem and started seeing the dynamic as the problem, everything became much more collaborative.”

Opel says couples often get stuck when they treat low desire as one person’s failure, asking questions like, “What’s wrong with you?” or “Why don’t you want me?”

“Being treated as the faulty part of the relationship is rarely an aphrodisiac,” she said.

Advertisement

Instead, both experts say couples need to look beyond the lack of sex itself and understand what is happening underneath it.

“Low desire is often a symptom rather than the problem itself,” Maree said. “Stress, exhaustion, resentment, body image concerns, parenting, medical issues, performance anxiety, mismatched desire styles or years of pressure can all contribute. Understanding the function of the disconnection is usually far more productive than simply trying to increase frequency [of sex].”

Opel added: “The bedroom is often just where the consequences appear.”

Taking sex off the table helped bring intimacy back.

Advertisement

Perhaps the most surprising strategy both experts recommend is temporarily removing the expectation of sex altogether.

“We actually banned sex for a while,” Opel said. “Which sounds like a slightly ridiculous solution to not having enough sex, but it helped enormously.”

Before that decision, she’d started avoiding even innocent affection because she worried every intimate interaction would eventually lead to sex she wasn’t ready for.

“I had started to avoid kisses and cuddles because I worried they would lead somewhere and I would eventually have to say no,” she said. “Once sex was officially off the table, I could relax into touch again. We could kiss, lie together or stroke each other without silently wondering what was expected next. It made affection feel like affection again instead of the first stage of a test I might fail.”

Advertisement

Maree often suggests something similar to the couples she works with.

“I usually suggest taking penetrative sex off the table temporarily – not because sex is bad, but because removing the expectation can dramatically reduce pressure.”

Rather than having couples try to manufacture desire, she encourages them to rebuild positive physical experiences through cuddling, massage, kissing, showering together or simply holding each other, instead of them trying to manufacture desire.

“Small, consistently positive experiences often rebuild trust more effectively than trying to engineer one perfect sexual encounter,” she said.

Advertisement
A shared bath could be on an expanded “intimacy menu.”
A shared bath could be on an expanded “intimacy menu.”

They expanded what intimacy could look like.

Both experts say reconnecting required letting go of the idea that intimacy had to lead to sex, or that rebuilding a sex life simply meant having more sex.

Opel encourages couples to create what she calls an “intimacy menu,” which might include kissing, massage, lying naked together, sharing fantasies, reading something erotic or simply spending uninterrupted time together.

Maree and her partner created something similar: a “pleasure menu” they could use to choose forms of intimacy based on how they were feeling in the moment.

“We also had to let go of the idea that fixing our sex life meant simply having more sex,” Maree said. “Instead, we became curious about what had made sex feel difficult in the first place and focused on creating experiences that felt emotionally and physically safe enough for desire to return naturally.”

Advertisement

She says the menu helped them reconnect without pressure.

“We used it to see what each of us were feeling like in our shared intimacy,” she said. “It included activities ranging from cuddling to mutual masturbation.”

By creating more ways to be physically close, both experts say couples can reduce the stress around sex and make affection feel enjoyable again rather than like an expectation.

There was hope because they never stopped caring.

Advertisement

Neither Opel nor Maree believes a prolonged period without sex automatically means a relationship is beyond saving.

For Opel, one of the clearest signs that her marriage could recover was that she and her husband still wanted a future together, even when they were questioning whether they could fix their intimacy.

“We did talk about divorce, but neither of us was calmly saying, ‘This relationship is over,’” she said. “We still laughed, parented well together and cared how the other person felt. We were upset because we missed each other, not because we had stopped caring.”

Maree says that’s often what gives her hope when working with couples experiencing sexual disconnection.

Advertisement

“I’ve worked with many couples who believed they would never reconnect sexually and later described their relationship as stronger than it had ever been,” she said. “Not because they found a magic technique, but because they stopped seeing each other as opponents and began working as teammates against the problem itself.”

Opel added: “Not every relationship should continue, and nobody should remain in a situation involving fear, coercion or persistent disrespect. But a quiet bedroom is not automatically a doomed relationship. Sometimes it is a signal that two people need to stop measuring what is missing and start listening to what has been neglected.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

People Are Learning Why Marshmallows Were Invited

Published

on

People Are Learning Why Marshmallows Were Invited

Dr Pepsi’s name isn’t just catchy: originally called Brad’s Drink, the newer name reportedly “derived from dyspepsia (ie. indigestion), which the beverage was supposed to assuage”.

A 1907 ad describes the drink as “an absolutely pure combination of pepsin – for the ingestion – acid phosphate and the juices of fresh fruits”.

And yes, digestive biscuits were originally meant to aid digestion too (seems our modern gut health obsession is nothing new).

But marshmallows, which were apparently eaten by the Ancient Egyptians many moons ago, “originated as a versatile medicinal syrup and ointment,” Britannica explained.

Advertisement

We don’t know for sure that Ancient Egyptians definitely used them for health reasons, though they appeared to have been reserved for nobility.

It does seem, however, that Ancient Greeks were using marshmallows for everything from wound-healing to sore throats by the 9th Century BCE.

There is some evidence to suggest the original versions may actually have helped with everything from coughs to skin irritation, too.

Marshmallows used to contain, well, marsh mallow

Advertisement

“Marsh mallow” is a herbaceous plant from eastern Europe and northern Africa. The root of this plant was used to make medicinal “marshmallows” in the past.

According to the National Confectioners’ Association (NCA), Ancient Egyptians “squeezed sap from the mallow plant and mixed it with nuts and honey”.

We don’t know what this tasted like, but we do know that in the 19th century, the plant was introduced to France.

At this point, “owners of small candy stores whipped sap from the mallow root into a fluffy candy mould,” the NCA said.

Advertisement

This was a very long and labour-intensive process, and confectioners struggled to keep up with demand.

It took until later in the century for marshmallow makers to substitute marshmallow root for gelatin, which is still a standard ingredient in the no-longer-medicinal modern versions.

So… what did original marshmallows taste like?

You can still get marsh mallow root tea, which contains the old-school sweet’s star ingredient. Its flavour is described as “earthy”, but obviously, that’s before it’s mixed with other ingredients.

Advertisement

Creator Phoenix Ross, who makes difficult, rarely spotlighted, and unlikely foods (including a giant potato smiley and fizzy grapes) by hand, recently tried an old-school marshmallow recipe, which included the root.

Noting the “snotty” texture it created when soaked (which was responsible for traditional marshmallows’ signature spring), he said the flavour was mostly “swamp”.

He added, “I think there’s a reason we’ve moved on from this”. I’ll take his word for it.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025