Politics
How To Keep Blood Sugar Under Control As You Age
Two health factors could play an important part in keeping cognitive decline at bay as you age.
New research from the University of Texas at San Antonio found physical activity and controlling blood sugar in midlife were linked to a “significantly slower rate of cognitive decline” later in life.
This adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that modifiable risk factors contribute substantially to cognitive decline and dementia.
What exactly did the new study find?
A total of 402 people were followed for the study – 52% were Hispanic and the rest were non-Hispanic white older adults, mostly in their late 50s.
Each participant was assessed using LS7 scores, a metric of cardiovascular health. The framework included three behavioural factors (healthy diet, non-smoking and physical activity) and four health factors (blood pressure, body mass index, total cholesterol and fasting blood glucose).
Researchers measured cognition up to four times using the Mini-Mental State Examination, an accepted 11-question screening test used to check memory, attention and thinking skills.
They then adjusted for age, sex, income and education to relate heart health factors to brain changes.
There were two key findings
Researchers found any physical activity was linked to slower cognitive decline in older Hispanic adults. The results are published in the journal Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Behavior & Socioeconomics of Aging.
Another significant factor was fasting glucose levels (the amount of sugar in the bloodstream after an eight- to 12-hour fast). The study’s authors said lower blood sugar readings were associated with slower cognitive decline among non-Hispanic white adults.
“Our findings suggest that engaging in any level of physical activity and potentially maintaining optimal fasting blood glucose levels in midlife are associated with a significantly slower rate of cognitive decline in late life,” said Janette Vazquez, first author of the study and a senior postdoctoral research fellow at the Glenn Biggs Institute, UT Health San Antonio.
As the results differed by ethnicity, further research is needed to explore whether these differences occur in larger samples, the authors said.
The best exercises to prevent cognitive decline
Aerobic exercise in particular has been linked to a reduced risk of dementia.
According to the Alzheimer’s Society, aerobic activities worth considering include: brisk walking, swimming, water aerobics, hiking, dancing, cycling, tennis, gardening (ie. pushing a lawnmower) and decorating.
How to keep blood sugar levels under control
Other studies have also found a link between higher blood sugar levels and an increased risk of dementia – even in those who aren’t diabetic.
Blurred vision, increased thirst, frequent peeing (especially at night), unexpected weight loss and recurring infections like thrush can all be signs of underlying high blood sugar.
Per Dr Sonya Khan, of healthcare provider UT MD Anderson, the issue can be caused by a range of factors including diabetes, eating too many refined carbohydrates and processed foods, some cancer therapies, infections, extreme stress and severe pain.
Here are some ways to keep your blood sugar under control as you age:
- Manage diabetes if you have it.
- Avoid eating too much sugary or starchy food and instead opt for more vegetables, fruits, and whole grains.
- Drink more water. “When your blood sugar is high, your kidneys filter out the excess sugar through urine,” said Dr Khan. “Making sure you’re adequately hydrated helps support this filtration process.”
- Manage stress.
- Exercise regularly.
Politics
Wings Over Scotland | The Land Of Do-As-You-Please
The contempt for the Scottish public now being openly shown by public servants paid from the public purse to answer to the public has at this point reached such endemic levels that we’re not sure an acceptable level of trust can ever be salvaged.
The reply above is not just evasive, not even just pathetic, it’s insulting – not just to us, but to every citizen of Scotland.
The letter we sent on 15 July has simply been ignored.
There is no attempt whatsoever to engage with the Dean of Faculty’s analysis, which clearly finds unarguable evidence of a crime. It merely repeats Police Scotland’s fobbing off of the decision to the Crown Office, who to date have also refused to offer the public any explanation why nobody has been prosecuted for a serious criminal offence committed by the governing party of the country.
It does fit a pattern, though.
Time and again in recent years, the SNP government has demonstrated its utter contempt for the law of the land, spending millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money fighting hopeless court cases, losing them, and then refusing to implement the courts’ rulings. It has to be dragged kicking and screaming into eventual compliance, often having deliberately caused delays of several years.
It does so secure in the knowledge that the establishment – and in particular the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, whose head, the Lord Advocate, is also a government minister answerable to the First Minister – will protect it at every turn.
(Click image above for the full, deeply troubling article.)
The kindest thing we can say about the latest non-response from DCC Houston is that it continues to focus attention on the festering cancer at the heart of the Scottish judicial system – the Crown Office, where justice goes to die. But if Police Scotland want to avoid being tarred with the same brush, they’re going to have to start doing a lot better than this.
Wings will take advice from its legal team on where we can go from here, but there are numerous possible options. We continue to await a response from Police Scotland to a Freedom Of Information request on the matter from last month, which has now passed the deadline.
It joins another FOI request, this one from early June, which is now more than a month overdue and which we’ve filed an official complaint over.
Police Scotland are usually very quick with FOI responses, in stark contrast to almost any other public body in Scotland, so one can only speculate as to what could be taking so long with these ones, neither of which is very complex or difficult.
But as regards the reply we started this article with, we’re struggling to imagine what “new evidence” the Deputy Chief Constable could require. A crime has demonstrably taken place, which was initially indignantly denied by the SNP, only to be subsequently publicly admitted by the First Minister AFTER the police investigation had concluded.
An admission after the investigation is plainly new evidence – indeed, it’s far more than mere evidence. You don’t need to investigate any more if a representative of the perpetrators has admitted to the crime.
Whether it was Police Scotland or COPFS who determined that embezzlement had not taken place, that decision has now been clearly exposed as wrong by John Swinney’s admission. All that remains to be established is who specifically was responsible, and that one isn’t hard to figure out – it was whoever was running the SNP at the time. The party leader is responsible for the executive decisions of the party.
A great deal now rests on the answers to those two FOIs. We have a degree of confidence that we’ll get answers, because the Information Commissioner is just about the only public servant in Scotland still committed to doing his job with decency, competence, integrity and professionalism.
It matters because as it stands, the grim truth is that the idea of Scotland being in a fit state to become an independent nation again is a child’s fantasy.
If you don’t have justice as a cornerstone of your society, and especially if those in power are completely above/in control of the law, you have nothing worth fighting for.
Politics
Mrs Brown’s Boys Christmas And New Year Specials Cancelled For 2026
Mrs Brown’s Boys creator Brendan O’Carroll has announced he will be unable to go ahead with this year’s festive specials on medical grounds.
Traditionally, the divisive comedy airs over both Christmas and New Year, but on Monday morning, Brendan shared that this would not be the case in 2026.
“It is with sincere regret I must announce that due to an unexpected medical issue I will have to cancel the recordings of the 2026 Mrs Brown’s Boys Christmas and New Year’s Specials,” he wrote on Facebook.
“Following a CT Scan, it was found that I had two fractures in my mandible (jaw) which require immediate surgery and a few months recovery.”
He continued: “I am talking with the BBC about getting Mrs Brown’s Boys back on the screen in 2027.
“I will sadly have to postpone both the 3 Arena Dublin and Gleneagle Arena shows Mrs Brown’s Boys D’Panto, which were scheduled for later this year. We are currently working with MCD to try to reschedule these shows for 2027. I would like to thank MCD and the BBC for their support and understanding at this difficult time.”

BBC Studios / BOC / Graeme Hunter
He added: “This decision has not been taken lightly and has been made on medical advice from my consultant. To say I am heartbroken is an absolute understatement. I would like to sincerely apologise to all our fans who were looking forward to seeing the shows and for any disappointment caused.
“I now need to focus on getting myself back to full health, and I genuinely cannot wait to see you all again in 2027. Our fans mean the world to us, thank you from the bottom of my heart for your love and support and trust me, Agnes Brown and her family will be back!”
Mrs Brown’s Boys specials have been airing annually on the BBC since 2011, the year the sitcom launched.
Since then, it has also inspired a spin-off talk show, All Round To Mrs Brown’s, and two films, including a cross-over with Tyler Perry’s character Medea.
Back in 2024, the show landed in hot water when rehearsals for one Christmas special were briefly paused due to an “implied” racist term.
“At a read-through of the Mrs Brown’s Boys Christmas specials, there was a clumsy attempt at a joke, in the character of Agnes, where a racial term was implied,” O’Carroll said at the time.
“It backfired and caused offence which I deeply regret and for which I have apologised.”
Politics
Police Begin Investigation Into Hayden Panettiere’s Death
Police officers in Greenville, South Carolina, are currently looking into the death of actor Hayden Panettiere.
On Sunday night, the Nashville star’s family confirmed in a statement that she had died at the age of 36.
Since then, a rep for Greenville Police has told NBC News that the Golden Globe nominee had been found at an apartment block in the South Carolina city on Sunday night, after a call was made to emergency services by an “acquaintance”.
“Upon arrival, medical assistance was administered; however, the individual, later identified as Hayden Panettiere, was pronounced deceased at the scene,” they said.
Their statement also explained: “The case is under investigation by the Greenville Police Department in conjunction with the Greenville County Coroner’s Office. The preliminary investigation has not indicated any signs of foul play or suspicious circumstances.
“An acquaintance of Ms Panettiere placed the 911 call.”
Hayden began her professional acting career at the age of five, and later became known for her work in shows like Heroes and Nashville, as well as the Scream film franchise.
She also appeared in Malcolm In The Middle, Ally McBeal and lent her voice to the films Dinosaur and A Bug’s Life, as well as the Kingdom Hearts video game series.
Her father Skip Panettiere issued a statement following the news of the late star’s death on Sunday, which read: “It is with profound sadness that we share the tragic passing of our beloved Hayden.
“She was an incredible light and a force of nature who brought immeasurable love and joy to all who knew her and to the millions who watched her onscreen.”
Last year, Hayden published her memoir This Is Me: A Reckoning, in which she opened up about the highs and lows she’s experienced during her time in the spotlight, including abuse, addiction and struggles with her mental health.
Hayden is survived by her 11-year-old daughter, Kaya.
Politics
Madonna Won’t Headline Glastonbury 2027, But Bosses Hint Taylor Swift Could
We’re afraid there’s been a disappointing update for anyone hoping to see Madonna making her Pyramid Stage debut next year.
Back in June, ahead of the release of her latest hit album Confessions II, the Queen of Pop sat down for a chat with presenter (and superfan!) Graham Norton for a one-off BBC special.
During their conversation, Madonna sparked rumours that she could be performing at Glastonbury when it returns next year, teasing: “I think I’ll do promo tours for a while. Then, in the summertime, something bigger.”
When Graham questioned whether it was something “in this country”, referring to the UK, she added cryptically: “It could be. Why do I have to tell you everything?”
At the time, many interpreted this as a nod to a future Worthy Farm performance, though Glastonbury organiser Emily Eavis has now poured water on this speculation.

Speaking to Radio 4, Emily said that while she can’t disclose who will be headlining in 2027, “it’s definitely not Madonna, I’ll tell you that”.
“We have got three headliners and we’re very excited about it – it’s all coming together really well,” she added.
Emily was then asked whether Taylor Swift was one of them, at which point she laughed off the question and said she wanted to change the subject.
Taylor was originally supposed to make her Glastonbury debut in 2020, following the release of her Lover album, but the festival was eventually cancelled that year due to the Covid pandemic.
Since then, the Grammy winner has released five studio albums, racked up six more UK number one singles and embarked on her record-breaking Eras Tour, but has yet to book another spot on the Glastonbury line-up.
Recent Pyramid Stage headliners have included modern chart-toppers Billie Eilish, Olivia Rodrigo, Dua Lipa and Kendrick Lamar, as well as acts like Coldplay, The Cure, Sir Elton John and Sir Paul McCartney.
Meanwhile, The Sun claimed last month that Madonna had “cooled on the idea” of performing at Glastonbury, and would instead book three nights at the British Summer Time festival at London’s Hyde Park for 2027 instead.
Politics
Nigella Lawson Joins Great British Bake Off Co-Stars In First-Look Photo
With mere weeks to go until we can tuck into the main delicacy that is Nigella Lawson’s Great British Bake Off debut, bosses have given us a little amuse bouche to tide us over until then.
On Monday morning, producers shared a first-look photo of Bake Off’s new family together for the first time, ahead of the show’s return to our screens, which is expected to take place next month.
“Life is about to get sweeter,” they teased, alongside the picture of Nigella with her new colleagues Paul Hollywood, Alison Hammond and Noel Fielding.
“Bake Off is coming soon…”
Although an exact return date for Bake Off is still being kept under wraps for now, the show’s launch has taken place in early September since 2020, so it’s a fair bet that this year will follow suit.
The new season will be Nigella’s first since taking over from long-serving judge Prue Leith.
Nigella said when the news was confirmed in January: “I’m uncharacteristically rather lost for words right now!” she enthused.
“Of course it’s daunting to be following in the footsteps of Prue Leith and Mary Berry before her, great dames both, but I’m also bubbling with excitement.”
She continued: “The Great British Bake Off is more than a television programme, it’s a National Treasure – and it’s a huge honour to be entrusted with it.
“I’m just thrilled to be joining the team and all the new bakers to come, I wish the marvellous Prue all the best, and am giddily grateful for the opportunity!”
Last month, the Daily Mail alleged that Nigella and Paul were “not really getting on too well” behind the scenes of Bake Off, claiming that the former was finding the latter’s somewhat ostentatious conduct “rather cringe”.
Reps for Channel 4 and Paul Hollywood did not respond to HuffPost UK’s request for comment at the time, while Nigella’s team declined to comment.
Politics
A suicide is not a lynching
Just when you thought the discussion about Jason Arday’s death couldn’t get anymore ghoulish, here come the ‘lynching’ wailers. This was a lynching carried out by a media industry drunk on racial hatred, they say. In this historically illiterate morality tale, Arday is the innocent black man and the reporters who queried his CV are his hooded killers. ‘The media lynched Jason Arday’, says Ibram X Kendi. Rarely has the soul-sucking relativism of wokeness been on such stark, sick display.
I have long been sceptical of the bourgeois misanthropy that dresses itself up as ‘anti-racism’. Yet even I am shocked by this hijacking of the bloody legacy of racial terror to score cheap moral points in 2026. Even I am astounded at the use and abuse of real anti-black terror as cheap fuel for modern grievance culture. I understand everyone craves clicks, but to liken the entirely legitimate questioning of a black professor’s claims with the dragging of a black innocent to a tree to be hanged for the delectation of a baying mob – this is truly beyond the pale.
Kendi was first out of the gates of shamelessness. He’s the African-American author of How To Be An Antiracist who achieved global fame in 2020 as the ideological feeder of rich whites consumed by historical self-loathing. If you are a ‘prominent black scholar’, they will ‘hunt you like a lynch mob’, he wrote. And that’s what they did to Arday. The ‘white-owned, mainstream media’ circled round him like vultures, ‘[piling] on and on and on and on’.
And they killed him. They lynched him. Of course they will never admit their part in this racial murder – ‘if you die from all the attacks, the media still calls the attacks on you “accusations” to wash their hands of the blood’, says Kendi. And that’s the sickest thing about these neo-lynchings, he says – ‘your lynchers announce your death as if they had no role in your lynching’. Thus all those headlines saying ‘Jason Arday found dead’, written by white scum who were as responsible for his demise as were those Klansmen who weaved the noose around the necks of their black quarry.
Kendi is not alone in marshalling past horrors as a kind of exclamation mark to his own privileged rage in the present. This was a ‘culture-war lynching’, said Black Lives Matter UK of Arday’s death. Columnist Karen Attiah, until recently of the Washington Post, called his demise a ‘death by media mob’ that brings to mind ‘the old machinery of anti-black terror’. In real time, on the digital highway rather than an Alabama dirt track, ‘Jason Arday was being lynched’, said British academic Kehinde Andrews.
Where to begin with such self-serving moral hyperbole? The first and saddest point to make is that only one person bears responsibility for Jason Arday’s death, and that is Jason Arday. He and he alone was the author of his untimely demise. To call his death murder, far less a lynching, is a crime against truth. It robs Arday himself of moral agency. There is inverted racial bigotry here, the presumption being that a black man could not possibly have authored his own destruction. No, those all-powerful whites, that ‘white supremacy in academic drag’, must be the true architects of his ruin. I don’t know what we should call such black infantilisation and white demonisation, but I know it’s not ‘anti-racism’.
Then there’s the patrician washing away of Arday’s own moral wrongs. In depicting him as an unblemished innocent, hounded by vindictive whites, his posthumous defenders strip his life of its complexities. The truth is that Arday was a man who made very bad choices. He appears to have plagiarised the work of others and to have engaged in giddy fabulism to make his life appear tougher and more fascinating than it was. To scrub such truths from the record is not ‘pro-black’ – it is a nauseating crusade of condescension that reduces blacks to blameless entities undeserving of the scrutiny that other ‘races’ receive.
To liken a suicide to a lynching is to fully abandon truth, meaning and moral intention. If you cannot see the difference between those bedraggled black men dragged against their will to the hanging tree and a privileged black man choosing to end his own life, then you are beyond help. Argument – words themselves – will not rescue you from the cesspit of cultural relativism in which you have chosen to make your moral home.
For me (perhaps because I’m white – forgive me – and I wrote critically about Arday), the grossest thing in the ‘lynching’ lie is the implicit suggestion that reportage is murder. That digging for the truth is a potential death sentence for the vulnerable. That saying untoward things about a professor who happens to be black is by definition racist, and possibly even KKK in its consequences. This is a grotesque slander against journalists whose only intention was to uncover the truth about Arday and the powerful institutions that employed and flattered him.
To call these people ‘lynchers’ is repulsive beyond belief. Every journalist I know who queried Arday’s rise to professorial power was motored by a thirst for truth. Skin colour was immaterial to them. They only wanted to know whether Arday had been honest, and what it says about Cambridge, the BBC and the other institutions that fell at his feet that not one of them asked that simple question. Calling journalism murderous, equating the asking of questions with the prepping of nooses, is tyrannical. It is right out of the Stalinist playbook to accuse dissenting scribes of endangering life with their pesky, lowlife questions. ‘Shut up or people will die’ – that’s what the lynching hysterics are saying.
It is their destruction of truth that truly jars. To call the self-authored death of Arday a ‘lynching’ is an appalling act of historical desecration. A lynching is not a literary device. It is not a shrill synonym for perfectly normal journalistic scrutiny. A lynching is the real, brutal robbing of a life. To jealously snatch that word and stretch it so thinly over a modern media firestorm is an insult to every black man who was dragged from his bed. What a testament to the suffocating self-pity of the woke that they see media inquiries as tantamount to extrajudicial execution. Their vanity is the enemy of history.
Politics
Trump Proudly Showed Off A Glowing Headline. There Was Just 1 Awkward Catch.
Donald Trump and the White House’s weekend boasts to reporters about the lowering of prescription medication prices somewhat backfired.
He encouraged photographers to snap images of him proudly holding up the story, making sure they got the shot.
“And I told you that was going to happen,” Trump bragged, before moving onto hyping other positive headlines about himself.
However, there was one problem.
As The Guardian pointed out, The Post’s article stated that although “the White House took credit for the good news,” it also actually noted further down in the story how “some experts said a Biden-era policy that requires Medicare to negotiate prices for some popular prescription drugs is more likely to be driving down costs,” and went on to cite those experts.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Pirates Of The Caribbean Boss Says Johnny Depp Return Talks Continue
Pirates Of The Caribbean producer Jerry Bruckheimer has claimed that he is currently in negotiations with Johnny Depp to get him to return to the franchise.
Over the weekend, Bruckheimer appeared at Disney’s annual D23 fan event, where updates are given about the company’s films, theme parks and other major projects.
During the event, Pirates Of The Caribbean’s lead producer confirmed to Deadline that he was “talking with Johnny” about getting him to play the role of Captain Jack Sparrow again.
“We’re working on a screenplay, and hopefully we can get this done,” he added.
HuffPost UK has contacted Johnny Depp’s team for comment.
Last year, Bruckheimer made similar claims, telling Entertainment Weekly that he’d been in contact with Depp about coming back as Jack Sparrow.
“If he likes the way the part’s written, I think he would do it,” he said, adding: “It’s a reboot, but if it was up to me, he would be in it. I love him. He’s a good friend.”
“He created Captain Jack,” Bruckheimer added at the time. “That was not on the page; that was him doing a little Pepé Le Pew and Keith Richards. That was his interpretation of Jack Sparrow.”
It should be noted, though, that after testifying in his infamous 2022 court case, Depp insisted he would not even accept an offer of “$300 million and a million alpacas” to reprise his role in a future Pirates Of The Caribbean film, after claiming Disney had dropped him from the franchise years earlier.
Depp has been a controversial figure ever since 2016, when his ex-wife Amber Heard alleged during their divorce proceedings that he had been abusive towards her in their marriage, which he denied at the time.
The two later reached a settlement and issued a joint statement, which read: “Our relationship was intensely passionate and at times volatile, but always bound by love. Neither party has made false accusations for financial gain. There was never any intent of physical or emotional harm.”
In 2019, Depp took legal action against Heard, accusing her of defamation after she penned an opinion piece claiming that she had been a victim of domestic abuse, without mentioning anyone, including her famous ex-husband, by name.
After a very public court battle, a jury eventually found in 2022 that Heard had defamed Depp with the statements in her opinion piece.
Two years before that, Depp had also sued the publishers of The Sun newspaper over a piece describing him as a “wife-beater”.
However, the UK’s High Court Of Justice eventually ruled that the “great majority” of Heard’s allegations of abuse could be proven to the civil standard, and as a result The Sun’s description was “substantially true”.
Depp appealed this verdict, but the request was eventually denied.
While he has been largely out of the spotlight in recent history, he is due to take the lead in Ti West’s A Christmas Carol reimagining Ebeneezer later this year, co-starring Oscar nominee Andrea Riseborough, Harry Potter’s Rupert Grint, Emmy winner Tramell Tillman and acting legend Sir Ian McKellen.
Politics
Trump Does Kim Jong Un A Favour
President Donald Trump said on Sunday that he has ordered the Pentagon to scale back the joint military exercises with South Korea that began this week.
In a Truth Social post, the president said his decision was based on his “very good relationship with Kim Jong Un,” and described North Korea as “unthreatening and respectful.” He also condemned South Korea for declining to help the US de-nuclearise Iran.
The joint exercises were expected to last 11 days and involve 18,000 South Korean soldiers, The Associated Press reported. In a statement carried by state media Friday, North Korea described the training as “a rehearsal for an aggressive war.”
Trump said that he sees the exercises as “hostile” to North Korea and costly for the US, but because it was too late to cancel them, he had ordered a reduction instead.
On Saturday, Trump posted a photo of himself standing next to the North Korean dictator and said the two get along well “despite the unfriendly look on this particular picture.”
It wasn’t immediately clear what scaling back the exercises would entail. South Korea’s Defense Ministry told AP that the drills had started on Monday local time as planned.
According to The New York Times, the two countries have conducted joint military exercises for over 70 years. Such exercises have been dedicated to honing the readiness of US and South Korean troops so they’re prepared to respond to North Korea’s military and weapons capabilities.
Historically, North Korean leaders have criticized the exercises while finding ways to capitalize on them. Experts told The AP that North Korea has used the exercises as a “pretext” to do its own weapons testing and curry goodwill for Kim. Just last week, North Korea fired a ballistic missile toward the sea ahead of the start of the drills.

Photo by Jung Yeon-je / AFP via Getty Images
It’s also not the first time that Trump has sought to curtail the exercises. He suspended the exercises in 2018 as part of denuclearization talks with North Korea, BBC News reported.
Critics of Trump’s announcement on Sunday emphasized that the move essentially aligned the US president with an authoritarian leader, while undermining America’s long relationship with South Korea.
“Our ability to help defend our ally against the North Koreans is because our forces are well trained and able to coordinate with the South Koreans,” Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) wrote on X. “Hollowing out these joint exercises is shortsighted and a mistake.”
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Trump: ‘The Woke Will Become Woke Again’
President Donald Trump shared an oddly lyrical prediction about the future of “the woke” on Friday.
Fox News’ Alexis McAdams and the president were discussing a viral interview in which Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Democrat, New York) joked about political discourse in the early 2020s. In it, the progressive lawmaker quoted New York City council member Chi Ossé’s quip that “Woke 1 was crazy.”
On Friday, Trump characterised Ocasio-Cortez’s comments as an example of Democrats trying to “disavow” previously held opinions on issues like crime.
McAdams asked, “Democrats are trying to back away from those woke thoughts before the midterms. How can you remind people of that?”
“They’re going to be reminded anyway, and you don’t have to remember too much,” Trump replied. “You know, you’re talking about elections that if you win by 10%, it’s supposed to be a landslide, right? So you don’t have to remember too much.”
That’s when he delivered his wokeness prophecy.
“People know the woke,” he said. “I mean, they know the woke. And the woke will become woke again, as soon as they get elected.”
Watch McAdams’ interview with Trump below:
Though Ocasio-Cortez distanced herself from some of the “rhetoric” of the COVID-19 pandemic-era, she added that many of the period’s conversations around social issues like crime were “quite fruitful.”
“I think that when we talk about crime today, it’s fundamentally different than the way we talked about crime, and bringing crime down, right?” she said. “And I think that we all share in the goals of having as low a crime rate as possible. I think, that, you know, during lockdown of course, rhetoric in that time is not rhetoric that we would use today.”
When asked if Ocasio-Cortez was going to run for president, Trump had a swift answer.
“I think so,” he said.
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Ann Taylor
-
NewsBeat5 days agoCommunication cards help banking customers access services or report scams
-
Business6 days agoOil Price Today (August 11): Crude oil rises to $88 after Trump’s compensation demand dents Hormuz opening. Here’s why
-
Crypto World6 days agoRevolut wins French banking licence, creates second EU banking hub
-
Sports3 days agoThis U.S. Amateur is a glimpse into golf’s future in more ways than you think
-
Crypto World7 days agoWhy Did Nvidia Stock Fall on Monday Despite a $500 Billion Wall Street AI Deal?
-
Sports2 days agoBirmingham 2026: Day 6 Timetable for Irish Athletes
-
NewsBeat2 days agoMyanmar says over 300,000 Rohingya refugees verified for repatriation as exodus enters ninth year
-
Politics2 days agoSEQ Code: The Three Letter Boarding Pass Code That Could Give You The Worst Seat
-
Entertainment5 days agoKeke Palmer Subtly Hints At Sean Evans Drama With Cryptic Post
-
Crypto World7 days agoGrayscale quietly drops Cardano, Polkadot and Hedera ETF plans
-
Fashion7 days agoCan You Wear Double Cloth Gauze Clothing To Your Office?
-
Fashion6 days agoCoffee Break: The Fonteyn Jane Flat
-
Crypto World6 days agoBitcoin's BIP Editors Remove Luke Dashjr Two Days After BIP-110 Fork Stalled
-
Entertainment6 days ago57 Years Later, the Best Sitcom Ever Made Still Deserves a Reboot
-
Tech6 days agoZoom Screen-Sharing Bug Let People Fully Take Over Other Devices On A Call
-
Crypto World7 days agoHormuz Nerves Cost Bitcoin $65,000 Mark Despite Solid Institutional Flows
-
Fashion6 days agoClaire Life: Kicking Off MVAAFF With the C Suite Luncheon Featuring Phylicia Rashad, Letoya Luckett, and More!
-
Fashion6 days agoShould you refinance your debt? Pros, cons, and real numbers
-
Crypto World5 days agoXRP bridge drained after software mistook fake deposits for real ones



















You must be logged in to post a comment Login