After four ambulances owned by Jewish charity Hatzola were set on fire, Israel lobbyists – including Nigel Farage – were quick to claim an ‘Iranian terror cell’ was responsible. The lobby said this was clear proof of Iranian hostile acts on UK soil and demanded a terror ban on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The lobby’s media allies, naturally, amplified the claim.

None of the ‘mainstream’ media, of course, bothered to wonder why a crack ‘Iranian terror cell’ would choose four nearly-defunct ambulances as their first target. But others did:

Suspect

The supposed ‘terror cell’ behind the 23 March 2026 attack had never been heard of before March 2026. Its emblem spells ‘Islamic’ wrong in Arabic. Its statement claiming credit for the attack mentioned the “Land of Israel”, a phrase no Islamic group would use.

The language of the group’s statements is also, according to Amsterdam’s VU university’s political anthropologist Younes Saramifar, a weird mix completely inconsistent with people as familiar with Arabic as religious Muslim Iranians would be. Saramifar concluded that:

The language of announcements shows a clear lack of fluency in Arabic. The language is generated by an AI tool. Furthermore, the electronic device on which the new video was edited does not have Arabic or English as its native language in its operating system. This is clear from where the colon and the exclamation mark are placed in the sentence. This shows that the group is neither native Arabic nor English speakers. Native speakers are habituated to managing these technical glitches. Based on their language use, I don’t think they are a direct proxy or a sleeper cell associated with the Axis of Resistance.

It seems the courts and Crown Prosecution Service agree, as the suspects have been released on bail this morning, 26 March 2026. As Irish comedian and political activist Tadgh Hickey pointed out, this “weirdly lenient” decision doesn’t really fit with the idea of a ‘terror cell’:

That’s a weirdly lenient way to deal with members of a new bloodthirsty Iran sponsored Shia terrorist cell 🤔 pic.twitter.com/8nwTWhqPNO

— Tehran Tadhg (@TadhgHickey) March 26, 2026

Israel has a long and well-documented history of ‘false-flag’ attacks to achieve political ends, including in London.

Featured image via the Canary

What are the new screen time rules?

What else does the guidance say?

A resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly declared the transatlantic slave trade and the associated system of racialised chattel enslavement to be the gravest crime against humanity, a text that saw the UK and Ukraine abstain alongside 51 other nations, mostly European countries, as the measure passed with 123 votes in favour and only three countries, Argentina, Israel, and the United States, voting against.

The resolution emphasised that “claims for reparations represent a concrete step toward remedy.”

Funny how the UK, which got rich off the whole operation, suddenly found itself unable to pick a side, except to side with silence.

Of course, the US, Israel, and Argentina voted no — they are shameless. The shameless Americans also said the UN “was not founded to advance narrow specific interests and agendas” while arguing that reparations for historical wrongs are not legally owed because such crimes “were not illegal under international law at the time they occurred.”

He has also recently contributed to five case studies covering damages from slavery, conflict-related sexual violence, climate change, racial injustice, and structural adjustment.

As we reported, Starmer’s former chief of staff Morgan McSweeney claimed his phone was stolen in October last year. This caused controversy, with many accusing McSweeney of faking the theft to destroy WhatsApp messages between himself and Peter Mandelson. Lending further credence to these suspicions, the Times has now revealed that the government hasn’t asked Mandelson to hand over his personal devices:

Exclusive:

Lord Mandelson has not been asked to hand over WhatsApp messages or texts from his personal phone amid mounting concern about the limited nature of the government’s disclosures

The peer handed over his work mobile when he was sacked as ambassador to the US because of…

— Steven Swinford (@Steven_Swinford) March 26, 2026

Advertisement

Shocking

The Mandelson scandal exposed that many people in Starmer’s government like to play fast and loose with the truth, including Mandelson himself. Given this, it should be a given that all of Mandelson’s devices need to be searched — not just the ones he was supposed to be using. If the man was willing to lie about his connections to Jeffrey Epstein, we can assume he was equally comfortable sending official messages from an unofficial device.

Times political editor Swinford said that Mandelson:

handed over his work mobile when he was sacked as ambassador to the US because of his friendship with the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein

But he has not been asked by the Cabinet Office for any of the messages on his personal device

It has been left to a group of a dozen officials to attempt to “reconstruct” the contents of Mandelson’s phone by asking ministers and officials for their correspondence with the peer

Advertisement

This sounds like a truly nightmarish way of conducting an investigation. It’s like they’re trying to put pieces of shredded paper together despite knowing where the original document is.

Swinford continued:

The Times has been told that the Cabinet Office was so concerned about the limited nature of the disclosures that it has asked people for messages from their personal devices

It is also now asking people for group WhatsApp messages that involved Mandelson, having initially refrained from doing so

Why refrain from asking people for messages? And why not just ask Mandelson? To be fair, they should definitely do both, because there’s every reason to suspect Mandelson would delete any evidence. After all, this is the guy the authorities suspected of being a legitimate flight risk following his arrest.

Swinford further said:

Mandelson used his personal mobile in the run-up to his appointment as ambassador before switching over to a work mobile just under a month into the role. He resumed using his personal mobile on his return to the UK after he was sacked in September

Oh, okay, so it’s confirmed; he did use his personal phone for work business.

What on Earth is going on?

It’s so bad that even the Tories are looking less sleazy than Labour, as Swinford noted:

The Tories said that under the terms of the “humble address”, a parliamentary mechanism that forces the government to disclose information, the Cabinet Office should have requested the messages from Mandelson.

They said that the failure to do so “risks putting the government in contempt of parliament”

Mandelson exceptionalism

This is how Swinford ends his post:

Mandelson could not be compelled to hand it over, but others who used to work for government have been asked for messages from their personal devices

In other words, they’re allowed to ask, but those being investigated are under no obligation to comply.

It’s funny, isn’t it, because they almost certainly would have to comply if they were normal people who’d stolen a loaf of bread. That’s a proper crime, though, isn’t it — not like sharing state secrets with the 20th century’s most notorious paedophile.

Featured image via UKinUSA

As highlighted by Big Brother Watch, iPhone users will soon need to prove their age to maintain internet access. It’s the latest in a line of changes which have come in the wake of the Online Safety Act:

🚨NEWS: UK iPhone users must now prove their age or lose full internet access

“It is absolutely outrageous that, overnight, Apple has put a chokehold on Britons’ freedom to search the internet, access information and use apps unless they provide sensitive ID documents.

This… pic.twitter.com/GNuCsihcDD

— Big Brother Watch (@BigBrotherWatch) March 25, 2026

Advertisement

iPhone changes: “draconian”

Silkie Carlo (Big Brother Watch Director) said in full:

It is absolutely outrageous that, overnight, Apple has put a chokehold on Britons’ freedom to search the internet, access information and use apps unless they provide sensitive ID documents.

This means 35 million Brits who have paid hundreds or even thousands of pounds for Apple tech suddenly now have a child’s device unless they comply with invasive demands for personal information that go far beyond what UK law requires.

Apple has crossed the Rubicon with this software update which is more like ransomware, holding customers hostage to ID demands that are invasive, exclusionary and unnecessary.

Children’s online safety is vital but requires better parental controls and thoughtful tech responsibility – not sweeping, draconian, shock demands by foreign companies for all of our IDs and credit cards.

Advertisement

Owners will have to verify their age after accepting the iOS 26.6 software update, according to the BBC. Anyone who refuses to verify their age will be treated like a child on a tablet with parental controls. Ofcom have described this as a “real win for children and families”, even though the move goes beyond what is legally required.

People have responded as follows:

Age verification is a Trojan horse for total control over the internet, your devices, and your entire digital life.

Not a single child will be protected by this.

If people don’t wake up and protest, your country is going to be next. https://t.co/BiH4F0cs7j

Advertisement

— calle (@callebtc) March 25, 2026

Apple just turned 35 million UK iPhones into identity checkpoints. Apple has, without warning, placed a gatekeeper on the devices of 35 million UK users who paid good money for full-featured smartphones and now find themselves holding something closer to a supervised children’s… https://t.co/5qTTHn18uQ

— Reclaim The Net (@ReclaimTheNetHQ) March 25, 2026

It looks like Reddit may be the next platform to introduce mandatory age checks:

‼️ BREAKING: Reddit’s CEO announced he is forcing human verification on the platform.

He will force users to verify through biometrics on their device, a third party, or government ID.

Advertisement

Every single option compromises your anonymity. On a platform built on anonymity. pic.twitter.com/HlpTWU95g7

— International Cyber Digest (@IntCyberDigest) March 26, 2026

Experiments

The BBC also reported:

Apple’s move follows a wider debate in the industry over how to keep young people away from harmful content online and the impact social media can have on children.

The UK government is trialling a test which will see 300 teens have their social apps disabled entirely, blocked overnight or capped to one hour’s use – with some also seeing no such changes at all – in order to compare their experiences.

Advertisement

The test will run alongside the government’s consultation asking whether the UK should follow in Australia’s footsteps by making it illegal for under-16s to have access to many social media sites.

As we’ve covered, there are reasons to be concerned about the impacts of social media. At the same time, establishment forces are using these concerns to push for an end to online anonymity. The solution to all of these issues begins with wrestling control of the internet back from the US tech monopolies who control 99% of our digital lives.

Featured image via Apple

Surprising no one, a Minister attached to a review on foreign interference has failed to declare his affiliation with Labour Friends of Israel (LFI):

The group has been linked to the Israeli government and been at the centre of a high-profile instance of “improper interference in our democratic politics” in recent years.

Weird not to mention it, no?https://t.co/0zj9KJiNs8

— Laura Webster (@LauraEWebsterr) March 26, 2026

Labour — foreign interference

The minister in question is housing secretary Steve Reed. Reed is linked to Labour Together (LT), which is the group that pushed Keir Starmer into 10 Downing Street. LT also maneuvered Peter Mandelson back into government, despite Mandelson’s ties to the dead paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Many suspected that Epstein worked for Israel’s Mossad; at the very least, he was a big supporter of what Israel were up to:

New photo emerges of Jeffrey Epstein on his private jet wearing an IDF (Israel Defense Forces) sweat shirt. The photo was supplied by Epstein’s butler (on the right) to the Telegraph (UK). pic.twitter.com/6pit5iovSX

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) August 9, 2025

So either Israel has secretly joined the United Kingdom or we’re all being scammed.

Featured image via Twitter

Yesterday, 24 March, Health Secretary Wes Streeting announced the offer of four replacement ambulances to Hatzolah, the Jewish-run charity ambulance service which suffered an arson attack on the morning of 23 March.

Since the attack, politicians across the political spectrum have voiced their condemnation of antisemitism. Predictably, some have also taken the opportunity to attack Muslims and migrants — without evidence that the attackers were either.

In Streeting’s case, both his words and his offer of tangible support are a clear demonstration of the energy we need when tackling bigotry in the UK. The problem is, this only makes his careless attitude to Islamophobia in his own NHS all the more egregious when we contrast the two.

Streeting — ‘Despicable act of evil’

In his statement, Streeting was unequivocal in his condemnation of antisemitism:

This shocking, cowardly, and despicable act of evil was not only an attack on London’s Jewish community, but on an ambulance service whose sole purpose is to save lives and care for others.

There is no doubt this attack was designed to strike fear into the heart of Jewish people in Golders Green and across the country. And, as a Member of Parliament who represents a significant Jewish community further east in London, I know what’s happened will be felt painfully and acutely by all Jewish people across our country.

Likewise, he also went on to praise Hatzolah, and offered his practical support:

Hatzola’s volunteers represent the very best of public service, providing rapid, life-saving care to anyone in need, and it is appalling that such a service has been targeted in this way.

Of course, the best form of solidarity is practical solidarity, which is why today, our London Ambulance Service colleagues are providing support to the team in Golders Green to make sure that we don’t skip a beat when it comes to responding to emergency call-outs. We will also be providing four replacement ambulances, initially on loan until we can provide permanent replacements. The Jewish community should not bear the cost of this hatred.

This moment demands more than practical support. The Jewish community will not stand alone – the government and this entire country stand with them.

Advertisement

We’re not going to argue with any of this. It’s the exact kind of response we should expect in the face of rising antisemitism in the UK. The problem is that, for Streeting and much of the Labour Party, that attitude clearly doesn’t extend to all forms of racism.

Streeting’s ‘Lack of urgency and movement’

As a case in point, late last year the British Islamic Medical Association (BIMA) wrote a letter to Streeting and other senior figures in UK healthcare. The missive urged action against a pattern of Islamophobic attacks on Muslim staff and patients in the NHS.

On 4 December, BIMA president Dr. Sahira Dar wrote a letter to Streeting which stated:

I am writing to express our growing concern that we have still not received a response to our previous correspondence on 20th October 2025 or our meeting on 9th September regarding the safety, fair treatment and freedom of expression of Muslim healthcare workers. This lack of urgency and movement is increasingly difficult to reconcile with, especially in light of a serious Islamophobic incident reported at Leeds Teaching Hospitals, where a copy of the Qur’an was desecrated on NHS premises.

In another letter, BIMA reminded Streeting that:

The NHS constitution commits the service and its leaders to uphold respect, dignity, inclusion and safety for all staff. Ensuring that Muslim workers and patients can engage with the NHS without fear, while trusting that discriminatory behaviour will be taken seriously and responded to transparently is fundamental to these values.

It also reiterated the organisation’s desire to meet with the health secretary to continue their discussions. Likewise, it expressed its extreme disappointment with the lack of communication from Streeting over the months.

‘Embarking on wholesale repression’

At the time, I wrote that this apparent lack of concern for Islamophobia is particularly galling, given that Labour recently launched an investigation into racism in the NHS which appears to privilege antisemitism over other forms of racism.

The government outlined these plans in a press release issued in October. Egregiously, the proposals introduce a blanket ban on expressions or symbols of solidarity with Palestinians.

The plan also advises the NHS to adopt the definition of antisemitism used by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). The organisation places Israel beyond reproach, and frequently conflates anti-Zionism with antisemitism.

In reaction, a coalition of 23 groups — including trade unions and Jewish organisations — undersigned a joint statement penned by Doctors in Unite (DiU) criticising the proposals.

Dr Coral Jones, chair of Doctors in Unite, said:

The government is embarking on wholesale repression within the NHS to try to silence health workers from speaking out against the bombing of hospitals and the detention, torture, and killing of our Palestinian colleagues in Gaza.

They accused Labour of elevating antisemitism above other forms of racism, and pointed to the Forde Report of 2022, which highlighted the hierarchy of racism within the Labour Party.

Streeting’s reaction to the attack on Hatzolah clearly demonstrates that he knows what a useful and constructive reaction to discrimination looks like. However, as the letters from BIMA and DiU show, the health secretary doesn’t extend that same care to all.

Labour published the final version of the Forde Report in 2022. However, it remains depressingly obvious that the hierarchy of racism is still deeply entrenched within the PLP.

Featured image via the Canary

Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP is chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Afrikan Reparations. (The spelling with a “k” is deliberate.) On 25 March, the UN International Day for the Remembrance of Victims of the Transatlantic Slave Trade, she presented a petition in Parliament. It calls for an apology for the UK’s role in African chattel slavery and colonialism.

Ribeiro-Addy’s petition hand-in comes as UN delegates vote on a historic motion, tabled by Ghana, which would recognise the trafficking and enslavement of Africans as a crime against humanity. The UK government has not indicated whether it will support this motion.

The petition calls on MPs to push for a state apology on behalf of the government and the monarchy for the UK’s role in the slavery and colonisation of African people.

It also asks parliamentarians to establish an All-Party Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry for Truth and Reparatory Justice. This would examine the legacy of these crimes and propose concrete steps to address their lasting damage.

It notes that there has never been:

a genuine apology for the enslavement, trafficking, genocide, and exploitation committed under British authority.

Ribeiro-Addy said:

To this day, our country has never provided a genuine apology for the crimes of British Empire or the Transatlantic slave trade.

Rather than acknowledging these historical injustices and how they have shaped the world we live in today, our institutions have sought to sweep them under the carpet.

So many of the intersecting global challenges we now face are rooted in the legacies of enslavement and empire: from geopolitical instability to racism, inequality, underdevelopment and climate breakdown.

Advertisement

To truly confront these issues, we must acknowledge where they come from. An apology could be a meaningful basis for action, signalling our country’s commitment not simply to righting historic wrongs but to tackling ongoing issues they have created and exacerbated.

Featured image via the Canary

PM Keir Starmer has introduced landmark legislation that will significantly change how politics operates in the UK. While MPs must still approve it, Cabinet Minister Steve Reed has confirmed that the government will apply it retrospectively. Bad news for Farage and Reform.

Justifying this move to backdate this policy, Reed cited the urgent need to protect the country’s democracy.

The proposed changes follow an independent review by Sir Philip Rycroft which explored the influence of political donations on British political parties. Rycroft’s review follows significant concerns surrounding foreign influence on domestic politics. Naming Iran, Russia, China and the US, the review put forward a further 15 recommendations to the Starmer government.

Nevertheless, Israel should also be included, given the scale of pro-Israel donations to the Labour Party ahead of the 2024 General Election.

It seems some foreign influence continues to operate largely out of sight in British politics.

In today’s London Influence:

😱 There’s more in the Rycroft review than the Farage-baiting crypto donation ban.
📈 Some new stats suggest we aren’t very good at policing election bad actors.
💼 We have loads of job moves for you to feast on.

Dig in 👇https://t.co/2vMKYlfFCR

— POLITICOEurope (@POLITICOEurope) March 26, 2026

Advertisement

Back to the drawing board for Farage

This news comes as little surprise. A month ago, the Guardian reported that a national security committee warned UK elections were “dangerously exposed” to foreign money and recommended implementing stronger safeguards to counter the risk.

Subsequently, this legislation appears to seek to do just that. Limiting donations from Brits abroad to £100,000 and banning cryptocurrency donations entirely will drastically impact the level of donations political parties can obtain.

It also works to reduce the unwelcome and disproportionate influence that super-rich donors have on policy decisions made by elected leaders. Nevertheless, these proposed changes are likely to impact some more than others. Reform UK has received £12m just in the last year from Christopher Harborne, an overseas investor based in Thailand.

When this legislation kicks in, Harborne’s donations will stop filling Reform UK’s coffers, and the crypto ban will hit Farage and his team — since they’re the only party openly taking cryptocurrency.

Reform deputy leader Richard Tice remains defiant, stating to GB News:

The reality is everything they’re trying to do is to stop the incredible progress of Reform, and cryptocurrencies are a perfectly legitimate way of investing, of earning within the law.

Once again, they’re putting a cap on donations from overseas electors, stopping crypto donations. We’ve got nothing to hide. It’s quite clear they’re absolutely petrified, terrified of the progress of Reform.

This X post highlights how big an impact these caps and bans will be on Reform’s super-privileged donations:

3️⃣ 🇬🇧 UK BANS CRYPTO POLITICAL DONATIONS — NIGEL FARAGE IN THE CROSSHAIRS
The UK just announced it will ban cryptocurrency donations to political parties and cap overseas donations at £100K/year.
Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party accepted Bitcoin donations and sourced two-thirds of…

— Joshua (@JoshOnTheMoney) March 26, 2026

Advertisement

‘The Sanctuary’ for the far-right

A recent investigation carried out by HOPE Not Hate and the Guardian unearthed troubling details surrounding the Sanctuary in London. Set up by British crypto billionaire Ben Delo, it offers financial support, free meeting rooms, podcast spaces and catered events to ‘hardline activists’. The investigation describes the set-up as a:

start-up accelerator for political initiatives, some of which are far right, like Rupert Lowe’s Restore Britain and the race science magazine Aporia.

Delo is reported to be ‘anti-woke,’ believing it to be an “existential threat to Western civilisation”. Beauty may be in the eye of the beholder, but most see the super-rich as the ultimate threat to peace and stability.

Something this new legislation from Starmer’s government reaffirms.

The Sanctuary appears to go to great lengths to avoid public attention. For instance, it requires organisations that use its spaces not to mention it online. Moreover, it has hosted high-profile figures, including far-right MP Rupert Lowe. Despite this, however, the media had not reported on it until now.

HOPE not hate and the Guardian draw attention to an ‘ecosystem’ purposed to support more extreme right-wing views in British politics, with Lowe being one of their biggest beneficiaries. Since his very public fallout with Nigel Farage, Lowe has used the Sanctuary as the base for his pressure group, Restore Britain, which he has now launched as a political party.

Speaking to the influence of Delo on the kind of politics that will come out of the Sanctuary, the investigation wrote:

We can reveal that much of Restore Britain’s social media content is produced directly inside The Sanctuary. In November 2025, Lowe used the offices to promote a policy paper on implementing mass deportations. Inspired by the USA’s “Operation Wetback” of the 1950s, Lowe’s paper called for “forced removals and subtler tactics for making residence in Britain unliveable for those with no right to be here”. Lowe has been holding his “rape gang inquiry” at The Sanctuary.

Restore Britain’s website demands immigrants be detained in “deliberately austere” camps. Lowe has elsewhere called for a ban on kosher and halal meat, which would make life for many British Jews and Muslims impossible.

The list of privileged, self-interested and ego-driven pundits doesn’t end there; the guest list includes race scientists and anti-abortion agitators, according to the in-depth investigation.

The names of former prime minister Boris Johnson and Tory party leader Kemi Badenoch are in there, having filmed episodes of Triggernometry, an anti-woke podcast, in The Sanctuary. The podcast, which has 1.7 million subscribers, uses Delo’s facilities free of charge.

The GB News presenter Andrew Doyle and the Peep Show actress Sophie Winkleman have also signed the book, as have the far-right activists Charlie Downes and Connor Tomlinson.

It’s about bloody time!

Public concern around donations from the super-rich to political parties has grown rapidly over recent years. This comes as the sheer scale of donations have surpassed levels seen in previous years, marking an escalation in the influence of billionaires. For instance, Quadrature Capital made the biggest political donation ever received by the Labour Party after donating £4m to Starmer’s campaign.

Funnily enough, the government then decided to scale back its commitment to a new green economic plan which ended up directly benefiting Quadrature. This followed Starmer’s choice to divert those funds to an increase in defence spending of £3.5bn which coincidentally increased the asset value of the hedge fund.

Therefore, this move by the government is crucial and necessary to safeguard our democracy. Their unparalleled ability to secure advantageous policies benefitting the richest in society will deepen inequality and hurt the majority of hard-working British people.

However, Starmer must go further than simply trying to undercut Reform’s advantage — he must also ban pro-Israel donations.

Featured image via the Canary