Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Keir Starmer’s sickening libels against the British people

Published

on

Keir Starmer’s sickening libels against the British people

Something truly callous happened in London on Saturday. Shortly before the grieving mother of a young woman who was murdered by an illegal immigrant was about to go on stage and share her heartbreak, activists flashed the slogan ‘Immigration makes Britain brilliant’ on a huge screen. As the mum was no doubt going over her notes, steeling herself for her nervous speech about the horrors inflicted on her daughter, ‘progressives’ decided to remind her and her dumb admirers that actually immigration is fab. And there it was: the iron fist of cruelty in the velvet glove of ‘Be Kind’.

The mum was Siobhan Whyte, mother of Rhiannon. In 2024, Rhiannon was murdered by an ‘asylum seeker’ from Sudan called Deng Majek. She had been working at the very migrant hotel where Majek was staying. One evening, after she finished another day’s graft of cooking for Majek and the others, he followed her to the railway station and stabbed her 23 times with a screwdriver. He then danced with glee over her bleeding body. Siobhan, in her speech at Saturday’s Unite the Kingdom rally, fumed against the politicians who have let our borders go to rack and ruin. Keir Starmer is an ‘abhorrent excuse of a leader’, she said. He has ‘failed us’.

The ‘progressives’ who intruded into the Unite the Kingdom rally with their pro-immigration taunting were from Led By Donkeys, the turbo-smug, craft-beer tosser collective that was born from the middle classes’ imperious disgust with the vote for Brexit. As Siobhan and thousands of others made their way to Parliament Square, Led By Donkeys carried out one of their cunning stunts, flashing their ‘brilliant immigration’ slogan on a digital billboard by the roadside. The bourgeois press lapped it up, loving this vision of graduate leftists from leafy London ripping the piss out of the gammon-hued working classes who dumbly worry about our broken borders.

Advertisement

The rest of us, though, those of us whose moral compasses are not yet cracked, were left with two striking images from Saturday. On one side, a shattered mum giving a faltering address on the awful fallout from unchecked immigration, and on the other, well-fed Guardianista wankers saying immigration is the best. On the stage, a harrowing tale of working-class suffering at the hands of a cruel man and an apathetic establishment – in the crowd, the digital scoffing of a privileged middle class that thinks riff-raff whining about immigration is basically fascism. Working-class pain and bourgeois jeers – rarely has our moral divide, our moral chasm, been so grimly on display.

These are the battlelines in modern Britain. There are the cold, insular elites for whom mass immigration is a source of moral virtue and cheap labour – and there are the concerned communities who worry that our withered sovereignty is undermining the sanctity of the nation and the security of its people. There are the chattering classes who have made being ‘pro-immigration’ into a cheap pose designed to demonstrate one’s moral fitness for high society – and there are the working classes who must live with the consequences of this sacrifice of our territorial integrity at the altar of bourgeois virtue. People like Siobhan Whyte, whose daughter’s precious life was lost to the post-sovereignty mania of her supposed betters.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

Saturday really did shine a light on The Two Britains. There were two protests in London. There was Unite the Kingdom, called by Tommy Robinson, at which a mostly working-class audience waved the Union flag and aired their grievances over the slow death of British identity. And there was the ‘Nakba Day’ protest, at which a mostly middle-class audience waved the Palestine flag and aired their fury against the world’s only Jewish nation. One gathering wanted to repair a kingdom, the other dreamt of destroying one – the Jewish one. ‘From the river to the sea’, they chanted, and we know what that means: erase the Jewish State, every last inch, all the way from the river to the sea.

The Palestine demo was an orgy of bigotry dolled up as virtue. It was proof that the middle-class left, bereft of ideas for Britain itself, now derives its sense of meaning almost entirely from hating Israel. Masked in their culturally appropriated keffiyehs, they barked for the globalisation of the intifada and wrung their untoiled hands over that sneaky, bloodlusting ‘Zionist entity’. The vibe at Unite the Kingdom could not have been more different. It was more mellow, more serious, more devoted to fixing the land in which we live rather than annihilating the land in which the Jews live. One side cried out for the restoration of
Britain, the other for the obliteration of Israel.

Advertisement

And yet it was Unite the Kingdom that was tarred as fascistic and dangerous, including by Keir Starmer himself. Was there bigotry in some of the speeches at Unite the Kingdom? Unquestionably. There were flashes of anti-Semitism at the rally, too, with one white-supremacist banner calling for an end to ‘the Zionist occupation of Britain’. Yet as the Campaign Against Antisemitism says, that vile far-right hate was ‘absolutely dwarfed by the anti-Jewish hatred [on the Palestine march]’. ‘Hang every ZOG pedo cunt’, said a placard on that ‘kind’ demo, ZOG meaning ‘Zionist Occupied Government’. The Palestine demo was infused with dreams of anti-Jewish violence (intifada) and a longing for the vaporisation of the Jewish State.

On what planet is it the grandmothers with St George’s flags who are the Nazis, while the masked mobs hollering for apocalyptic violence against the Jewish nation are ‘progressives’? In what moral universe does it make sense to denounce proud working-class Britons as fascist scum, while letting the lowlife celebrators of the 7 October pogrom pose as good guys? This is moral inversion of the most staggering kind. It is a crime against truth. If you’re working class and want to live in a safer, happier nation, you’re scum; if you’re a keffiyeh loudmouth who thinks the rape and murder of Jews is ‘resistance’, you’re good. Future historians will marvel at the lies and sheer moral bankruptcy of our times.

Starmer’s televised address on Friday, in which he railed against Unite the Kingdom as if it were the second coming of the Luftwaffe, was the most shaming moment of his premiership. The vast majority on that rally were good people who just want proper working borders, a tougher clampdown on Islamist extremism, and a tad more national pride. For Starmer to defame them as a threat to the nation, as a ‘stark reminder of exactly what we are up against’, is repulsive. We now have a prime minister who defines himself in opposition to his own people, like some mad, drunk monarch marooned in his remote tower. Those chanters on Saturday were right: ‘Keir Starmer’s a wanker.’

Advertisement

Brendan O’Neill is spiked’s chief political writer and host of the spiked podcast, The Brendan O’Neill Show. Subscribe to the podcast here. His latest book – After the Pogrom: 7 October, Israel and the Crisis of Civilisation – is available to order on Amazon UK and Amazon US now. And find Brendan on Instagram: @burntoakboy.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

The House | The new Single Patient Record will be a game-changer for clinicians and patients

Published

on

The new Single Patient Record will be a game-changer for clinicians and patients
The new Single Patient Record will be a game-changer for clinicians and patients


4 min read

If we get these reforms right, the impact could be transformational.

Advertisement

The NHS is at its best when you don’t notice the gaps. When you have no sense of delay, no concerns you’ve been misunderstood, misdirected or forgotten.

When a clinician already knows your history, when you don’t have to repeat the same story over and over again, and when test results, medications and treatment plans are available, whenever and wherever you receive care, that’s when you know the health system is working.

Yet for too many patients, that still isn’t the reality.

Despite huge advances in technology over recent decades, records sit in different systems, medical teams do not always have access to the information they need, and patients are left carrying the unreasonable burden of joining the dots themselves.

Advertisement

I know personally how important joined-up care can be.

Eighteen years ago, the NHS came to my rescue when I was diagnosed with a serious and rare neurological condition that threatened my ability to run, write and speak. Thanks to the extraordinary care I received from my consultant and his team at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in Queen Square, I am now symptom-free.

My experiences of multi-disciplinary care and support left me with immense gratitude for our health service. It also reinforced a simple truth: the best care depends on clinicians having the fullest possible understanding of the person in front of them.

Advertisement

That is why the Health Bill, recently introduced to Parliament, provides for a Single Patient Record. All your medical records in one place.

At its heart, the Single Patient Record is not about technology. It is about patients and the power of clinicians to collaborate and deliver seamless care.

It will facilitate health and care information being brought together so that authorised professionals involved in a person’s care have access to all the information they need, when they need it. Rather than replacing existing GP or hospital records, it will connect them, helping create a clearer and more complete picture of a patient’s needs.

The benefits for patients are enormous.

Advertisement

For a pregnant woman attending appointments across different services, it could mean midwives and clinicians having immediate access to relevant medical history, reducing duplication, and supporting safer decisions.

For a frail older person living with long-term conditions, it could mean GPs, hospitals, community teams and social care services working from the same information, spotting problems earlier and intervening before a crisis develops.

The benefits for clinicians are just as significant.

Today, doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals often have to waste considerable, precious time locating information that already exists elsewhere.

Advertisement

By bringing this information together, the Single Patient Record is expected to save around 500,000 hours of doctors’ time each year. Estimates suggest the programme could also help prevent up to 20,000 A&E attendances and 6,000 hospital admissions annually by supporting earlier intervention and better coordinated care.

Of course, none of this can happen without public confidence. People are right to expect their medical information to be protected.

That is why strong safeguards, rigorous cybersecurity and strict controls over access to patient information are fundamental to the design of the Single Patient Record. 

The Single Patient Record will be delivered through contracts with multiple suppliers, with no single supplier dominating. Joining up data across the system. Patients will also have greater visibility of their own information through the NHS App, helping them play a more active role in managing their health.

Advertisement

If we get this right, patients will spend less time repeating their stories, clinicians will spend less time chasing information, and the NHS will be better equipped to provide the joined-up care people deserve.

This is not simply a technological upgrade; this is patient care reform for the generations.

 

James Murray is the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Sara Cox To Launch Radio 2 Breakfast Show With Tom Hanks

Published

on

Sara Cox To Launch Radio 2 Breakfast Show With Tom Hanks

Sara Cox is pulling out all the stops to get her new Radio 2 show off to a flying start.

On Monday morning, Sara announced that her first Radio 2 breakfast show broadcast would be airing on Monday 6 July – as well as unveiling the A-lister of all A-listers as her inaugural guest.

For her first show, the presenter will be joined in the studio by two-time Oscar winner Tom Hanks, where he’ll be discussing the latest addition in the Toy Story franchise.

“Roll on the 6 July!” she enthused. “For generations to come people will (probably) say ‘where were YOU when the Sara Cox Breakfast Show was launched on Radio 2 featuring the legendary Tom Hanks?’ (and hopefully they’ll reply ‘listening and laughing along with a nice brew’).”

Advertisement

Back in April, it was announced that Sara would be taking over at the helm of the Radio 2 breakfast show, following the abrupt firing of its previous host Scott Mills.

At the time, Sara said she was “ecstatic, honoured and incredibly chuffed” to be taking on the role, which she said had been her “dream” since joining Radio 2.

“It feels like a bit of a full circle for me,” she admitted.

Sara previously hosted the Radio 1 breakfast show between 2000 and 2003, and had been Radio 2′s teatime host since 2019 before her latest appointment.

Advertisement

“I’ve had the most glorious seven years of my career on teatime so thank you to my brilliant teatime listeners who hopefully will join me at breakfast for excellent music and all my usual nonsense plus some superstar guests,” she added, noting that she “can’t wait to wake the nation up with the biggest most fun breakfast show ever”.

Since Scott Mills’ sudden exit, Gary Davies has been filling in on the Radio 2 breakfast show.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Harry Styles Delivers David Hockney Tribute During Wembley Stadium Show

Published

on

David Hockney

Harry Styles took a moment to share a powerful tribute to the late artist David Hockney on the first night of his 12-show Wembley residency.

Before Harry performed his single Aperture to a packed Wembley Stadium on Friday night, a quote from Hockney appeared on the screens.

“What an artist is trying to do for people is bring them closer to something, because of course art is about sharing,” read the quote, which was met with rapturous applause from the audience.

“You wouldn’t be an artist unless you wanted to share an experience, a thought.”

Advertisement

The pioneering British painter and photographer David Hockney died last week, at the age of 88.

Over the course of his career, he had become known as one of the most prolific and beloved artists of his generation.

In May 2022, the former One Direction star sat for Hockney, travelling to his Normandy studio to be painted by the legendary artist.

The resulting artwork was one of more than 30 new portraits displayed for the first time in the National Portrait Gallery’s exhibit David Hockney: Drawing From Life in 2023.

Advertisement
David Hockney

In the portrait, the Watermelon Sugar singer is depicted wearing an orange and red cardigan, with a pearl necklace and blue jeans.

Harry was a big fan of the Yorkshire-born artist, telling Vogue in 2023: “David Hockney has been reinventing the way we look at the world for decades. It was a complete privilege to be painted by him.”

David was less of a fan of Harry – in fact he had no idea who the Grammy winner was before he arrived for his portrait session.

“I wasn’t really aware of his celebrity then,” Hockney admitted. “He was just another person who came to the studio.”

David Hockney's portrait of Harry Styles on display in 2023
David Hockney’s portrait of Harry Styles on display in 2023

ANDY RAIN/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

Friday saw Harry open the first night of his record-breaking residency at Wembley Stadium.

Advertisement

The chart-topper will play the London stadium for 12 nights – breaking records previously held by Coldplay and Taylor Swift.

During the show, he also paid tribute to his X Factor days, recalling how his sister took him to Wembley Arena for his first audition.

“My sister is here tonight,” he said to the adoring crowd. “I want to thank her. I love you and I appreciate you.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Why London Is Using Beavers To Protect A Tube Station From Floods

Published

on

Why London Is Using Beavers To Protect A Tube Station From Floods

The animals of Ealing’s Paradise Fields have some unexpected new neighbours.

For the last couple of years, beavers have been making an enclosed 10-hectare site their watery home – and since more or less their 2023 arrival, a London Underground ticket office that used to be plagued by flooding has remained dry.

The city’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, has praised Ealing’s beavers for putting an end to soggy conditions in parts of nearby Greenford Tube station on Instagram.

“Beavers are nature’s engineers – we just didn’t realise how efficient they could be,” Khan said in his post, adding, “These incredible creatures have already stepped up to stop flooding at a Tube station and restore local habitats”.

Advertisement

We spoke to Elliot Newton, the director of rewilding at Citizen Zoo, which worked with the Ealing Beaver Project to reintroduce the animals, about why they were brought back to the West London site and how they might help us humans.

Where have beavers been reintroduced to the UK?

It’s not just London. In recent years, beavers have been released across the UK, including other parts of England like Somerset and Cornwall. Scotland has kept the wild beavers spotted as early as the 2000s, the Natural History Museum said, with planned releases in the Glen Affric Nature Reserve and River Beauty set for 2026.

Wales seems keen on bringing beavers back, too. Northern Ireland hasn’t expressed interest yet, but the animals were probably never native there, unlike the rest of the UK.

Advertisement

“The Eurasian beaver is a native British species that was hunted to extinction around 400 years ago (and likely disappeared from London much earlier),” Newton told us.

“Over the past two decades, there has been a growing movement to restore beavers across Great Britain.”

And while the expert argued there’s a strong case for bringing all kinds of native species back to boost our ecosystem – including those we might not love the idea of, like the rat-sized, fish-eating fen raft spider – “beavers also deliver significant practical benefits”.

He continued, “As ecosystem engineers, they create and maintain wetlands that can reduce flood risk, improve water quality, increase drought resilience, and support a huge range of wildlife”.

Advertisement

Why might beavers help to prevent flooding in the UK?

Newton said that flood mitigation was one of the main reasons they secured funding for this project.

That’s because beavers (famously) build dams which stop the rapid flow of water down rivers during, e.g., periods of extreme rainfall. They also form ponds and mini “canals” that can create absorbent wetlands.

“Through building dams and creating wetland habitat, the beavers have increased the site’s capacity to store water and slow flows during heavy rainfall events, helping reduce downstream flood pressure. Interestingly, since the beavers arrived, the local train station ticket hall, which had previously experienced flooding, has not flooded,” Newton said.

Advertisement

“While more research is needed, this is an encouraging example of the potential for nature-based solutions to support climate resilience in urban areas.”

Other benefits people involved in the Ealing Beaver Project have noted include increased biodiversity, better community engagement (leading to a reduction in antisocial behaviour), and a more climate-change-resistant environment.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The Strange Therapy Exercise That Changed How I Date

Published

on

The author is now working to show up authentically in relationships of all kinds.

When I was 41, my therapist handed me photos of every boy in my fourth grade class and instructed me to condemn each one to the paper shredder. It was my first experience of truly being in the driver’s seat, and I felt giddy with control.

From an early age, I’ve carried an acute fear of rejection and abandonment. This has made dating challenging, to say the least. My typical dating pattern used to be the following: I’d meet someone I liked, become enamoured, only to find myself spiralling into persistent anxiety, worried about when and how the relationship would end.

That sense of unease began in middle school.

The night my friend revealed she had a boyfriend, we were bundled in sleeping bags on chalet bunks, up past curfew during our eighth grade ski trip. She was the first in our group to date.

Advertisement

As the girls clamoured for details (“What does he look like? What school does he go to?”), I should have known something was off when the only question I thought to ask was, “Aren’t you terrified that he’s going to break up with you?”

Although it would be years before I experienced romantic heartbreak firsthand, I now realise that even then, I was already bracing for the worst.

By the time I was older, like anyone who frequents pop psychology circles, I was aware of attachment styles and how early childhood experiences can shape adult relationships. Yet, I grew up in a safe, stable home with parents who didn’t always get along but loved and supported me unconditionally, so I never really understood where this anxiety came from.

This confusion persisted until 2021, when a session with my therapist changed everything.

Advertisement

At that time, I’d booked an appointment because I had just started seeing someone new. It was the first person I’d liked since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, and I’d noticed my usual pattern taking hold again. I was overcome with anxiety over whether things would work out, and it was keeping me up at night and distracting me at work. This time, though, I felt exhausted. I was ready for a change.

“I don’t want to feel this way anymore,” I told my therapist.

Her first question was to think back to my childhood and pinpoint when this fear of rejection might have started. One incident immediately stood out.

In fourth grade, we had our first sex education class. Not long after, the boys in my class lined all the girls up against the exterior wall of our school and took turns rating each of our bodies – hot, not or disgusting. Some of the boys took it a step further and pointed out who was “flat as a board.” It was most of us; we were barely 10 years old.

Advertisement

It was such a humiliating and disorienting experience. I don’t remember how each of the boys rated me – not that it mattered – but I felt disgusting.

At that age, I was still very much a kid and hadn’t even started liking boys. My favourite book was Harriet the Spy, and I loved taking ballet classes, reading books and playing with Barbies with my three best friends. I also thought I was pretty cool, being the proud owner of sparkly jelly shoes and an impressive sticker collection.

Suddenly, it was like none of that mattered, and I was now hyperaware of my body and how it was perceived by boys.

Part of my childhood died that day. The message was clear: it doesn’t matter how you feel about yourself; what matters is being chosen and that boys choose you, not the other way around.

Advertisement

For years, I dismissed this firing squad of tween-age rejection as just another weird story from adolescence. But when my therapist prompted me to recall the memory, I finally understood how deeply it fuelled both my fear of rejection and the perfectionism I carried into my romantic relationships.

When I started dating in my late teens and early 20s, I was focused on making myself as likeable as possible, and I became really good at it. I shape-shifted myself into the ultimate “cool girl”. I never asked for too much from my partners out of fear they’d reject me. Instead, I swallowed my feelings and discomfort, shrugging off subpar treatment from the people I dated.

You don’t want to commit, but still want me to act like your girlfriend? That’s OK. I’m the cool girl! I’ll bring you homemade soup when you’re feeling sick, even though I’m not sure you even know my last name.

I felt like I was always proving myself, and being chosen was the reward. It’s only now that I can see I spent years so focused on being what my partners wanted that I rarely stopped to ask whether they were enough for me.

Advertisement

Even in the relationships where I felt safe to show up authentically, I struggled to express my needs. There was always a little voice warning that if I revealed too much of myself, I would be deemed “disgusting” all over again.

Sharing this with my therapist, she helped me realise that my fear of rejection was only part of it. What I struggled with was people-pleasing. In pursuit of being liked by other people, I abandoned myself.

It was time to stop the cycle. My therapist decided on an unconventional approach: reject the boys once and for all.

The author is now working to show up authentically in relationships of all kinds.

Photo Courtesy Of Simone Paget

The author is now working to show up authentically in relationships of all kinds.

As homework, she had me print photos of each of the boys who’d participated in the “lineup” in middle school – an easy task since I grew up in a close-knit community, and I’m still in touch with many of the people I went to school with on Facebook.

Advertisement

When I arrived at her office the following week, photos in hand, we spread them on the floor.

Seeing all of the boys’ photos – now middle-aged men with grey hair and receding hairlines – and rejecting them, out loud, was unexpectedly powerful.

I was finally able to see my tormentors for who they are: a bunch of guys I wouldn’t want to date anyway. In fact, most of them are married, and I’m queer and currently much more interested in dating women.

My therapist had me face each man and reject them one by one.

Advertisement

“Are you ready for the fun part?” my therapist asked.

She led me over to her desk, and together we eviscerated the photos in the paper shredder.

My therapist’s exercise might seem out of the box, maybe even a little mean to some, but it did exactly what she had hoped: it set me free.

It made me realise that I no longer have to play by a middle school rulebook that never served me. I don’t have to wait to be chosen; I can practice discernment and actively choose myself instead.

Advertisement

Unlearning a lifetime of people-pleasing is an ongoing, tricky process. At our core, I think most of us want to be liked and loved by others. It’s why rejection stings.

While I still fear rejection sometimes – I get anxious when I see those three blinking dots after I’ve sent a text to someone I like – I’ve stopped basing my self-worth on what other people think of me.

The author today.

Photo Courtesy Of Simone Paget

The author today.

Instead, I’ve made it a habit to boldly show up as myself in my friendships and the communities I frequent. I’m learning that by sharing and being honest about the parts of me that I used to worry were “disgusting” (for example, that I am not cool and detached, but rather sensitive and have very big feelings), the right people are actually drawn to me rather than repelled.

I’ve also gained clarity about what I actually need from a relationship, such as steadiness, consistency and emotional safety, which has made it easier for me to spot when a connection isn’t aligned. As a result, it takes me much longer to get into relationships than it did in the past – and I’m OK with that.

Advertisement

Rejecting people who aren’t a good fit still feels uncomfortable sometimes, but I see it as a form of self-care, like I’m sticking up for that little girl version of me who felt so disempowered.

Now, when I meet someone new, I don’t wonder if they’ll choose me. I ask a different question: Do I even like them? And I let the answer guide me.

Simone is a writer and host of the podcast “We’re Never Doing This Again.” She is a nationally syndicated relationship columnist for the Toronto Sun, and her words and photographs have appeared in Apartment Therapy, Business Insider, The New York Times, The Washington Post and more. You can follow her on X and Instagram at @simone_paget.

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

JD Vance Hit With Community Note Over WW 2 Claim

Published

on

JD Vance Hit With Community Note Over WW 2 Claim

JD Vance has been hit with an epic community note on X after claiming World War 2 ended with a negotiated peace agreement.

The US president made the bizarre claim as he defended his administration’s attempts to end the Iran war.

Vance said: “This is how wars ultimately get settled. If you go back to World War 2, if you go back to World War 1, if you go back to every major conflict in human history, they all end with some kind of negotiation.”

But a community note on X pointed out that World War 2 ended “with unconditional surrenders by Germany on May 8, 1945, and Japan on September 2, 1945, rather than negotiation.”

Advertisement

Social media users were just as unforgiving about the vice-president’s historical gaffe.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Councillor Who Defected To Reform Laments Joining Farage Party

Published

on

Councillor Who Defected To Reform Laments Joining Farage Party

A councillor who left the Conservatives to join Reform UK has called his own defection “the biggest mistake of my life”.

Robbie Lammas, elected as a Medway councillor in 2021, joined Reform in October 2025 – and is already planning to quit Nigel Farage’s party.

“I’m going to leave Reform, I’ve had enough, it’s not what I signed up to, and I feel I’ve been misled,” he told the BBC. “Yeah, I am embarrassed about it. It was a huge mistake.

“Lots of others from Reform have told me they too feel it was a mistake to defect but they’re not in a position to publicly admit it, but for me I’m happy to admit I’ve made a big mistake.”

Advertisement

He said the move was the “biggest mistake of his life”, adding: “I think at the time I was used for a news story.”

Reform announced 20 Conservative councillors had joined its ranks last autumn on the penultimate day of the Tory party conference.

Lammas, who now sits as an independent councillor, said: “I find with Reform they’re good at spin, but struggle with good governance.”

A Reform UK source said: “We rejected him for a job multiple times – a failed Tory is no loss to the party.”

Advertisement

The right-wing party only has eight MPs, but it has frequently pointed to its victories in local elections as proof of its growing popularity.

Reform won the largest number of seats in England in May 2025, securing 41% of all local authority seats (677 in total) being contested at the time.

The party also picked up more than 1,450 council seats this year.

But 21 councillors have been kicked out of Reform since winning their seats, while 33 others have defected, seven have been suspended and one disqualified.

Advertisement

A further 47 have resigned and five have lost their seats.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Mary Trump Flips The ‘Masculinity’ Script On Her Uncle Donald Trump

Published

on

Mary Trump Flips The 'Masculinity' Script On Her Uncle Donald Trump

The clinical psychologist slammed her relative in the latest edition of her Substack newsletter while responding to Sen. Ted Cruz’s (Republican, Texas) questioning of the masculinity of Texas US Senate candidate James Talarico.

“Apparently we are supposed to believe Ted Cruz is now the nation’s foremost authority on masculinity,” she wrote. “Personally, I do not care. It seems like an odd qualification for public office. What are they going to do? Arm wrestle? Challenge each other to duels?”

“Fight in a cage match on the White House lawn?” she added, a sarcastic nod to the controversial UFC fight card that the president hosted on his 80th birthday on Sunday.

“But if we are defining masculinity, I would have thought one basic requirement would be defending your spouse when another man publicly attacks her,” Mary Trump continued, a nod to her uncle’s personal attacks on Cruz’s wife, Heidi, during the 2016 presidential election and the senator’s subsequent endorsement of his onetime rival.

Advertisement

She then delivered a pointed swipe at the president.

“What do I know?” wrote Mary Trump, a fierce critic of the president. “I grew up in a family with Donald Trump, who knows absolutely nothing about being a real man.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nigel Farage Compared To Enoch Powell Over Discrimination Claims

Published

on

Nigel Farage Compared To Enoch Powell Over Discrimination Claims

Nigel Farage has been dubbed “the Enoch Powell of the social media age” after he said that Britain was now a “two tier state against white people”.

The Reform UK leader made the incendiary claim in the first of a series of essays he plans to publish on Substack.

He said he had decided to start using the platform because “the mainstream media constantly distorts what I say”.

In the essay, published on Sunday morning, said the “British state is no longer working for everyone in this country”.

Advertisement

That was in reference to the murder of Henry Nowak, who was arrested and handcuffed by police as he lay dying after being wrongly accused of racism by his killer, Vickrum Digwa.

“There is nothing fair about the way white people have been treated by their governments,” he said.

Housing, healthcare, education, policing, the military and the workplace are all listed as being adversely affected by what he describes as “deeply anti-white racism”.

“Anything which is seen to disadvantage a minority group is cracked down on,” he said.

Advertisement

“Anything which benefits a minority and damages the White British is likely to be left alone.”

On housing, he said that during the last century, “rules which gave priority to local people and ties to the area were stripped away”.

Farage said that under a Reform government, foreign nationals living in social housing would be given a three-month grace period to relocate to private rented accommodation, or face deportation.

But Lib Dem leader Ed Davey accused the Reform leader of “pushing the politics of grievance and division”.

Advertisement

He said: “Nigel Farage has turned into the Enoch Powell of the social media age.

“He’s trying to excuse racist disorder and violence against police officers. He’s pushing the politics of grievance and division that goes totally against our fundamental British values of tolerance and decency.

“Farage is desperate to turn our United Kingdom into his version of Trump’s America. We can’t let him.”

Enooch Powell was a Tory minister who sparked outrage with his infamous 1968 speech warning of “rivers of blood” due to mass immigration.

Advertisement

Former defence minister Al Carns, who resigned in protest at the government’s spending plans for the armed forces, said Farage was “a race-baiter in a Barbour jacket”.

Culture secretary Lisa Nandy told Sky News that Farage “should take his nasty hate and anger and division somewhere else”.

“I think people want hope,” she said. “They don’t want more anger, they don’t want more division, they don’t want more hate, and I wish he’d just take it somewhere else.”

Posting on X, Tory MP Ben Obese-Jecty also rejected Farage’s claims.

Advertisement

“Trying to whip up the politics of grievance will be a genie that’s difficult to put back into the bottle,” he said. “Nigel Farage isn’t stupid. He knows that.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

10 Worst Jobs For ‘Sunday Scaries’ In The UK

Published

on

10 Worst Jobs For 'Sunday Scaries' In The UK

Sunday scaries – or feelings of dread and anxiety that build before the working week – are believed to affect as many as 67% of UK workers.

Psychologist Kia-Rai Prewitt told Cleveland Clinic it’s an “anticipatory anxiety”, meaning it has to do with your expectations of coming stress in the work week.

We’ve written before at HuffPost UK about signs your Sunday scaries may be more than normal work dread. And new research from travel agent SpaSeekers has sought to find the jobs that make us stress the most before Monday even hits.

Workers are losing days of their lives to Sunday scaries

Advertisement

The SpaSeekers study, which polled 1,000 UK workers, found that people spend an average of 2.5 hours a week worrying about their work on the weekend. That amounts to 200 days over a lifetime (woah).

Just over a quarter (26%) of employed adults surveyed said that the Sunday scaries make them lose sleep, while 21% shared it means they can’t enjoy the last day of the weekend at all.

Work stress and busyness are the most common sources of anxiety (29%), while a heavy workload affects 23% of employees.

“Imposter syndrome”, or feelings that you’re not good enough, and worries about being asked to come into the office more often, affected 11% of respondents each.

Advertisement

Which jobs are the worst for Sunday scaries?

Per this survey, the worst jobs for Sunday scaries were revealed as being:

1) Finance
The Sunday scaries were found to regularly affect 95% of those in this category.

2) Human resources (HR)
Affects: 91%

Advertisement

3) Manufacturing
Affects: 87%

5) IT and telecoms
Affects: 84%

8) Healthcare
Affects: 83%

9) Arts and culture
Affects: 82%

Advertisement

10) Building and construction
Affects: 76%.

Don’t ignore your Sunday scaries

Kerry Sutcliffe, a corporate and individual coach at Kerry Sutcliffe Coaching, said: “The Sunday Scaries could be described as a physical alarm bell, telling you that something is not right. It’s a sign, a flashing red light and something you should listen to, pay attention to, and take action on.”

That might include planning your week ahead of Sunday, she added. “I recommend doing this on a Friday afternoon… Once done, you can close the laptop and enjoy your weekend, knowing you’re all set for Monday morning,” she advised.

Advertisement

“Get all of those unhelpful thoughts out of your head and down on paper!”

The NHS suggests you should see a GP about anxiety if you’re struggling to cope with fear and panic, and/or if lifestyle changes like getting enough sleep and exercising don’t help.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025