Politics
Miriam Margolyes’ Comments About Andi Peters’ Skin Colour Face Backlash
Miriam Margolyes is facing criticism over comments she made to Andi Peters during her latest appearance on This Morning.
On Thursday morning, the Bafta was interviewed by Andi and co-host Christine Lampard live on the ITV daytime show about her new book Miriam’s Full English, in which she reflects on modern-day British culture.
During the conversation, Miriam began imitating Christine’s Northern Irish lilt, before turning to Andi and asking: “What accent would be normal for you? What are you?”
“What am I?” Andi responded, to which Miriam said: “Well, you’re a mix, aren’t you? You’ve got a Black daddy and a white mummy?”
“No, no, both my parents are Black,” he then clarified, with Miriam going on to comment more on his skin colour.
Making light of the situation, Andi questioned whether the show’s make-up team had made him a “lighter shade than normal”, before the Harry Potter star remarked: “I think you’re what I would call ‘high yella’. That’s what they call it in America when someone isn’t deeply Black.”
“High yellow” – described by Merriam Webster as a “dated” and “often offensive” term – was historically used to refer to Black people who had a lighter complexion.
When Andi commented that he “didn’t even know there were shades”, Miriam told him: “There are shades. And this is what we have to incorporate…”

Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock
Andi then interrupted to say that the producers in his earpiece were “getting nervous now”, but Miriam then said: “Don’t be nervous. We [in Britain] welcome everybody. And that’s what I want to write about in my book!”
This uncomfortable exchange didn’t sit well with many viewers, some of whom claimed that the exchange was removed from the conversation when the broadcast was made available to watch on ITV’s catch-up services.
HuffPost UK has contacted representatives for Miriam Margolyes, Andi Peters and This Morning for comment.
Over the years, Miriam has become known for candid and unfiltered approach in interviews.
However, this has led to controversy on some occasions, including back in 2024, when she, again, asked an interviewer “what are you?” while speaking live on an Australian panel show.
This Morning airs every weekday from 10am on ITV1 and ITVX.
Politics
33 Cosy Autumn Home Decor Ideas: Blankets, Pumpkin Decorations, And Candles
It’s cosy season. Finally! After a long and hot summer, the collective urge for a little chill in the air has been palpable.
Instead of sweating through your daily commute, you’ll be wrapped in cosy argyle jumpers, sipping on autumn-inspired hot coffees, and bundling up in scarves and hats.
September might be the start to the school year, but who’s to say it can’t usher in a new mindset for adults too?
One of the best ways to embrace the new season – I think – is to decorate your home.
It’s where you’ll be spending most of your time for the foreseeable, so you might as well deck it out in the full works: browns and plaids, pumpkins, and fluffy textured blankets.
If you’re as ready to cuddle up on the sofa as I am, I’ve rounded up the best cosy and cute autumn home decorations – including candles, blankets, pumpkin trinket bowls, and an adorable hedgehog doorstop.
Politics
Nigel Farage Insists Reform Has Done ‘Nothing Wrong’ Amid Sting Operation
Nigel Farage has insisted Reform UK has done “nothing wrong” after a sting operation raised questions over the party’s foreign donations.
Speaking just as Reform’s annual conference begins in Birmingham, the party leader tried to shrug off an explosive undercover report from Channel 4 News which has already caused two of his aides to step down.
Investigative journalists from Verbatim have accused the party of allegedly taking funding from a US company to commission three supposedly independent polls at £32,500 earlier this year.
Reform’s head of policy James Orr and Farage’s close aide Dan Jukes organised the donation. They were unaware the donors were actually undercover reporters from the investigative group Verbatim.
The journalists, posing as an American father and his British son “William Lockwood”, also suggested donating £500,000 to Reform UK.
British electoral law says political donations can only be made by someone eligible to vote in the UK or a UK-registered company.
Jukes allegedly proposed a way for them to work around the law by sending the US funds via the British son.
Farage spoke out for the first time about the investigation on Friday morning, telling LBC’s Nick Ferrari at Breakfast: “The party has broken no laws. The party has not taken any dodgy money or anything like that whatsoever.”
He accused the reporters of “entrapment” after getting “a couple of our contractors to say things that perhaps should not have been said”.
The Clacton MP admitted: “I’m not happy about it.”
He also defended the polls themselves, saying: “There’s no question of illegality over the polling whatsoever.
“Whilst the poll benefited Reform, it wasn’t commissioned by Reform. It had nothing to do with Reform.”
He also claimed “the polling is not even an issue”, adding: “The party has not done anything wrong, but entrapped conversations don’t look good, and that’s why we’ve taken the action we have.”
On his top allies stepping down, Farage added: “The issue is when they talked about putting money in that might have come originally from America… But on the face of it, they said things that shouldn’t have been said.”
Reform UK has launched an internal investigation over the incident.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Will There Be A Practical Magic 3? Sandra Bullock Already Has Ideas
Practical Magic 2 hasn’t even hit cinemas yet, but Sandra Bullock already has an idea for a third instalment.
The cult classic film’s star alluded to the possibility of a Practical Magic 3 in a new interview with Vanity Fair.
“We’ll do a number three if this takes off,” Sandra said, claiming a third movie would “pass the torch to the girls”, referencing her on-screen daughters Joey King and Maisie Williams, who play Kylie and Antonia Owens in the upcoming sequel.
Practical Magic 2, the follow-up to the 1998 autumnal favourite, brings back Sandra and Nicole Kidman as the magical Owens sisters, with Stockard Channing and Dianne Wiest also returning as the guiding aunts who raised them.
However, this time around, Nicole and Sandra step into the role of advisers, with an official synopsis for the film teasing: “A multi-generational family of witches, cursed to be loveless for centuries, attempts to break the spell by confronting dark secrets and sacrificing for each other.”
Practical Magic 2 centres on Kylie and Antonia after they inherit the family’s magical legacy, unaware of the curse that comes with someone falling in love with them.
Sandra told People earlier this week that honouring generations of women inspired her and Nicole to return to the Owens’ family story.
“We forget that our mothers and grandmothers were young women with dreams and hopes and desires as well. And we never looked at them as human beings like that,” the Oscar winner explained.
“They were just Mom and Grandma. So in this, we get to look behind the curtain and go, ‘I didn’t know you felt that way, I didn’t know you were longing’.”
Sandra’s comments about any upcoming film focusing on the next generation come days after the original film’s Kylie Owens, Evan Rachel Wood, spoke out about being replaced by Joey King without being notified.
“I really appreciated Joey King reaching out to me, because no one who worked on the original film did,” Evan said in an Instagram story earlier this week. “She’s a sweetheart.”
Director Susanne Bier told Variety at the premiere earlier this week that replacing Evan with Joey wasn’t “a personal thing”.
“It was that the kids in the story are right out of college, and so it wasn’t really a question, you know? We had to recast,” she explained.
Practical Magic 2 releases in cinemas on 11 September
Politics
How To Keep Spiders Away: Best Natural Spider Deterrents For Autumn
I don’t know about you but I’ve noticed a lot of spiders indoors of late – from the bulbous ones making Halloween-esque webs in my garage, to the smaller ones gracing each and every window frame, to the spindly lass who decided to have a billion babies in a suitcase under my bed (not a fun find).
Autumn is typically deemed peak spider season in the UK – that is, the time when spiders head indoors to find a mate and we see a lot more of them. But are there more this year? And did spider season happen upon us earlier than usual?
Professor Adam Hart, an ecologist, conservation scientist and entomologist at the University of Gloucestershire, told HuffPost UK: “There does seem to be a perception that ‘spider season’ has started slightly earlier this year, and anecdotally I’ve noticed house spiders appearing a little earlier myself.
“I’ve seen several over the last couple of weeks, whereas I’d normally expect them to become particularly noticeable around the beginning to middle of September.”
That said, he doesn’t think it’s “dramatically early” for them to be making an appearance in people’s homes.
“The spiders haven’t suddenly appeared or necessarily come into the house because autumn has arrived,” he added.
“Many house spiders live in and around our homes throughout the year. What changes in late summer and autumn is that adult males become much more mobile as they wander around looking for females, which is why we suddenly see these large spiders running across floors or becoming trapped in baths.”
We’ve also had a pretty hot summer which means windows will have been left open on repeat, giving spiders a free pass to head inside. Another reason why you might be seeing a lot more of them than usual.

How to keep spiders away from your home
Prof Hart noted preventing spiders is “much easier than trying to repel spiders once they’re inside”.
That said, he’s pretty sceptical of some of the more traditional spider deterrents (think conkers and peppermint oil) as there “isn’t convincing evidence that putting these around the home provides reliable protection against spiders”.
So, how can you prevent them from coming inside then? “If people really don’t want spiders entering the house, the most useful measures are physical ones: insect screens on open windows and doors, sealing obvious gaps around windows, doors and pipes, and using draught excluders where appropriate,” he said.
But it’s also worth remembering that spiders are beneficial predators. “They feed on flies and many of the other small invertebrates that share our homes, so if a spider is living unobtrusively somewhere, leaving it alone is often the easiest option,” he added.
The best way to get rid of spiders if they’re freaking you out
Not everyone is enthralled by the prospect of sharing their home with spiders, so if you do spot one, the best way to get it outside again is with a glass and a piece of card.
“Put a glass or other container gently over the spider, slide a piece of reasonably stiff card underneath and carry it somewhere suitable,” said Prof Hart.
“There are also some useful spider-removal products you can buy and their long handles often make them easier to use if you really aren’t keen on spiders.”
If you spot a big old house spider in your home, he suggests popping it in a shed, garage or other sheltered location “because these spiders are strongly associated with buildings and sheltered environments”.
And if you find one in your bath, it’s not necessarily because it’s climbed up your plughole Incy Wincy-style. “Spiders generally fall into baths and then can’t climb the smooth sides. You can remove it with a glass and card, or simply provide something such as a towel over the side that it can climb up,” added the expert.
If your home is particularly appealing to spiders, you might spot the odd egg sac knocking around too. “Firstly, don’t panic. An egg sac doesn’t necessarily mean you’re about to have hundreds of large spiders running around the house,” continued Prof Hart.
“Different species have very different reproductive cycles and the spiderlings that emerge are tiny and disperse.”
If the sac is somewhere unobtrusive, he suggests there’s no need to do anything with it. But if you genuinely don’t want it inside, he recommends “carefully moving it, ideally with the female if she is obviously guarding it, to a sheltered location such as a shed, garage or outbuilding, rather than destroying it”.
Politics
Politics Home Article | Senior Reform UK Aides Step Down After Undercover Report On Donations

Nigel Farage (Alamy)
3 min read
Two of Nigel Farage’s closest allies have stepped down pending the outcome of an internal party investigation after a report broadcast by Channel 4 alleged that the pair arranged party donations that breached UK electoral rules.
On Thursday, Verbatim and Channel 4 aired an investigation appearing to show senior officials James Orr and Dan Jukes arranging for polls commissioned by the party to be paid with money from an American company.
Over the course of a year, Verbatim used an undercover reporter to investigate whether Reform UK was using foreign donations to fund the party’s activities. The reporter posed as the British-born son of a wealthy American businessman who was looking to give money to Farage’s party.
The donations totalled more than £32,000. Under UK electoral law, foreign companies are not permitted to fund party activities.
Reform UK is currently holding its annual conference in Birmingham, where the party had hoped to regain some of the momentum lost over the past year. Farage is currently under investigation over an undeclared £5m gift he received before becoming an MP.
In the investigation, footage filmed across several meetings appears to show the undercover reporter discussing and agreeing the funding with both Orr, Reform’s head of policy, and Jukes, a senior aide.
While Orr originally claimed that Farage would not be involved, a meeting with the party leader and the undercover reporter in Clacton this summer appeared to show the leader was aware of the transactions, apparently calling the deal “bang for buck”.
On Thursday evening, a spokesperson for Reform UK said the party had been the target of a “hoax” and denied any wrongdoing.
On Friday morning, Reform UK issued another statement, saying that the party had launched an investigation following the broadcast.
The spokesperson said: “Reform UK has launched an investigation following the broadcast of a Channel 4 News programme.
“Both individuals involved have stepped down from their respective positions pending the outcome of the investigation.
“The party believes it is important that the investigation is allowed to proceed independently and without prejudice. No further comment will be made while the investigation is ongoing.”
Reform MP and chairman Lee Anderson has said the party has been advised by a KC that it did not break the law.
But he also told Sky News on Friday morning that there was “no chance” of Orr and Jukes returning to their positions. This was later contradicted by deputy leader Richard Tice who said the possibility of their return was yet to be determined.
Orr said: “I have agreed to step down from my current role at Reform UK pending the outcome of the party’s internal investigation into the conduct of the program, with which I will cooperate fully.”
Since Verbatim and Channel 4 published the investigation on Thursday evening, Labour and the Liberal Democrats have reported the allegations to the Metropolitan police.
A spokesperson for the force said: “We’re aware of media reporting on Thursday, 3 September involving political party donations and an alleged breach of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 relating to polling.
“We will assess this matter and any information provided to us.”
Politics
A new European chapter for Gibraltar
Jamie Trinidad KC explains how the implementation of the UK-EU Agreement in respect of Gibraltar agreed by the UK and EU will affect both Gibraltar and Spain and the border between the two.
Brexit was widely regarded as a disaster in Gibraltar. In the 2016 referendum, 96% of Gibraltarian voters chose Remain, on a turnout of 84%. Gibraltar is British by political choice, but it is geographically and culturally European. Communities on both sides of the Gibraltar-Spain border – now an external border of the EU – depend on its fluidity for their livelihoods. This is not just a question of economics – many families and friendships straddle the border. Brexit therefore posed a unique set of problems, and there was little point viewing them through the ideological prisms of Westminster politics.
Gibraltar was excluded from the scope of the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement. A ‘Proposed Framework’ agreement concluded by the UK, Gibraltar and Spain on New Year’s Eve of 2020, hours before the end of the Brexit transition period, sketched the outlines of a post-Brexit settlement. However, converting that political understanding into a binding agreement between the UK and EU has taken several years of complex negotiations. The resulting UK-EU Agreement in respect of Gibraltar was signed in Brussels on 14 July 2026 and was applied provisionally (pending ratification) from the following day.
The Treaty contains hundreds of pages of dense legal text, but its central bargain is easy to understand. The physical barriers and routine immigration checks at the Gibraltar–Spain land border disappear, allowing people and goods to move across it far more easily. In return, Gibraltar (or, formally, ‘the UK, in respect of Gibraltar’) accepts substantial regulatory alignment with the EU. This includes rules protecting the integrity of the Schengen Area, and a customs union with the EU. Gibraltar’s services-based economy depends on some 15,000 frontier workers, most of whom are EU nationals, so the removal of restrictions at the border is a ‘win-win’.
Historically, the status of the border has dominated life in Gibraltar, shaping Gibraltarian identity itself. Spain, which has often used border restrictions as a political stick, closed the crossing completely in 1969. It was during the difficult closed-border years that Gibraltar joined the EEC with the UK in 1973, on special terms that excluded Gibraltar from, among other things, the Customs Union, VAT and the Common Agricultural and Fisheries Policies. The border reopened gradually between 1982 and 1985, shortly before Spain joined the EEC. For Gibraltarians who remember the years of enforced isolation, questions concerning border arrangements have profound emotional as well as economic significance.
The most controversial aspect of the Treaty settlement is the issue of EU (i.e. Spanish) officials conducting Schengen-facing border controls on persons who arrive in Gibraltar by air and sea. With the physical infrastructure of the border disappearing, the integrity of the Schengen area had to be protected at Gibraltar’s external points of entry. Under the Treaty, passengers arriving at the Gibraltar airport and port must therefore undergo both Gibraltar checks and Spanish Schengen checks. Maritime passenger volumes (excluding cruise passengers, who are generally exempt from Schengen checks) are tiny, so port arrivals are bussed to the airport border checkpoint.
The presence of Spanish officials exercising regulatory functions at the airport, while Spain continues to claim sovereignty over Gibraltar, is a bitter pill to swallow for many Gibraltarians, and prominent UK Brexiteers have described it as a ‘betrayal’. However, the Treaty expressly states that nothing in it affects the UK or Spanish legal positions on sovereignty or jurisdiction. Spanish and British border officers will perform their respective functions within a small ‘Joint Facility’ attached to the airport and located equidistantly in Gibraltar and Spain. Gibraltar remains outside both the EU and Schengen, so EU law is not directly applicable in Gibraltar. Where alignment is required, Gibraltar gives effect to the relevant rules through its own legal order, and the CJEU has no enforcement jurisdiction.
The Treaty arrangements differ radically from the status quo ante. Before Brexit, Gibraltar was inside the EU but outside the customs union and Schengen; now it is outside the EU but in a customs union with it and applying Schengen border rules. Gibraltar has lost valuable aspects of EU membership, such as participation in the single market for services. However, the Treaty offers new opportunities. Beyond the benefits of a free-flowing border, the Treaty opens the possibility of direct air links between Gibraltar and EU destinations, and provides a framework for cooperation in areas such as policing and the environment.
Neither Gibraltar nor Spain is a party to the Treaty, but both have played important roles in bringing it to fruition. A UK–Gibraltar Concordat records that the UK entered into its Treaty obligations with the Gibraltar government’s consent and following its ‘full participation’ in the negotiations. Gibraltar will carry much of the burden of implementation. And although the UK remains responsible for Gibraltar’s international relations, it has undertaken (‘other than in the most exceptional circumstances’) not to terminate the Treaty without either a three-quarters majority in Gibraltar’s Parliament or majority support in a Gibraltar referendum.
Regardless of the Concordat, democrats across the UK political spectrum ought to respect Gibraltar’s wishes regarding the continuing application of the Treaty, in line with the current UK government’s commitment to Gibraltar of ‘nothing about you without you’.
The fate of the Treaty also depends on Spanish cooperation and goodwill. Within four years of ratification, a committee appointed under the Treaty will submit a report evaluating its implementation, and if Spain asks the EU to terminate the Treaty in the light of that report, the EU must ‘take the necessary steps’ towards termination, ‘in accordance with its internal procedures’.
The success of this Treaty should be judged from the perspective of the people who are most affected by it. Gibraltar did not vote for Brexit, and its interests differ from those of the UK. Considering the actual choices available to Gibraltar – i.e. a hard external Schengen border, or a negotiated accommodation with its European neighbours – the Treaty settlement, for all its compromises, is vastly preferable to a no-deal scenario.
Ultimately, the Treaty does not restore what Gibraltar lost as a result of Brexit, but it does provide a solid foundation for Gibraltar’s future as an open, prosperous, European democracy.
By Professor Jamie Trinidad KC, Fellow of Wolfson College, University of Cambridge. He has advised the Gibraltar Government on aspects of the Treaty, but the views expressed here are personal.
Politics
2 Reform Officials Step Down After Undercover Sting Operation
Two Reform UK officials have stepped down after an undercover sting operation raised questions over foreign donations, according to Lee Anderson.
The party chair told Sky News that Reform’s head of policy James Orr and Nigel Farage’s close aide Dan Jukes have both quit following an explosive report from Verbatim.
As first reported by Channel 4 News, Farage’s party took funding from a US company to commission three supposedly independent polls at £32,500 earlier this year.
Orr and Jukes organised the donation. They were not aware the donors were actually undercover reporters from the investigative group Verbatim.
The reporters, posing as an American father and his British son “William Lockwood”, also suggested donating £500,000 to Reform UK.
British electoral law says political donations can only be made by someone eligible to vote in the UK or a UK-registered company.
The party denied any wrongdoing and called the whole operation a “hoax”.
The incident has been reported to the Metropolitan Police who are assessing the reports.
Anderson told Sky News: “The two men involved, James Orr and Dan Jukes, they’ve stepped down from their roles, they’ve stepped away. It’s only fair now we launch a full internal investigation.”
He said the party would remain “fair, open and transparent” while looking into what happened.
“It’s right to get rid of this distraction straight away,” Anderson added, as Reform prepares to open its annual party conference in Birmingham today.
He added that there was “no chance” of the two men coming back as Reform is a “serious party”.
When asked if more senior staff, such as party leader Farage, should take responsibility, Anderson said it “wouldn’t be fair” for him to comment until “the investigation is completely over”.
However, the party chair was unable to say who is leading the internal probe when speaking to other broadcasters.
He also told BBC Breakfast: “We have spoken to our KC which advised no laws have been broken.
“Reform UK has launched an internal investigation to see what we can only describe as far left agitators have got that close to the party to make this documentary.
“One of the other questions we are asking is how is this funded?”
Verbatim, founded by the Centre for Climate Reporting and is funded out of the United States.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Tom Hardy Will Return For MobLand Season 3 After Behind-The-Scenes Drama Rumours
Despite no end of speculation as to whether or not he’d be returning, it’s now been confirmed that Tom Hardy will, in fact, be appearing in the forthcoming third season of MobLand after all.
Last year, Tom made his debut as fixer Harry Da Souza in the Paramount+ crime drama, sharing the screen with Dame Helen Mirren and Pierce Brosnan.
However, in the lead-up to season two’s release, it was initially reported over the summer that the Oscar nominee had parted ways with the show, amid supposed behind-the-scenes tension.
Following this, conflicting reports downplayed this speculation, with bosses finally confirming on Thursday evening that season three will be moving forward – with Tom still part of the cast.
Dame Helen had previously defended her co-star, insisting she’d work with him again in a “heartbeat” despite their “different” creative “processes” on set.
She enthused: “I love Tom. I think he’s the most amazing actor.”

Before the wheels start turning on season three, though, there’s MobLand’s second offering to get out of the way first.
The next episodes of the popular gangster series will begin streaming on Paramount+ later this month, with an official synopsis teasing: “In season two, the Harrigans struggle to show a unified front as rising rivals threaten their fractured criminal empire – and Harry Da Souza, their street-smart and formidable ‘fixer,’ must walk a dangerous tightrope when tensions within the family intensify.
“As violence spills into every corner of their lives, loyalties snap, safety proves temporary, and the battle for power leaves no room for mercy.”
Janet McTeer, Joanne Froggatt, Johnny Flynn, Mandeep Dhillon, Paddy Considine and Toby Jones are among the actors who will also be making appearances in season two.
Take a look at the trailer for MobLand season two – which will premiere on Friday 18 September – below:
Politics
Why Zack Polanski has gambled on Holborn and St Pancras
Keir Starmer’s resignation as an MP, delivered mere hours before his successor first appeared at the despatch box as prime minister, sets up the sixth by-election of 2026 and the seventh of this parliament.
The coming contest in Holborn and St Pancras follows a series of by-elections of varying significance, including Nigel Farage’s recent brush with self-styled “intergalactic space warrior” and satirical candidate Count Binface. The stakes were undoubtedly higher in Makerfield, which returned Andy Burnham to parliament after years in the relative wilderness. Burnham’s Makerfield victory set in train the sequence of events that led to Starmer’s twin resignations – first as prime minister, then as an MP – and therefore this latest by-election.
Future chroniclers of Starmer’s downfall will also consider the February 2026 contest in Gorton and Denton. Here, the decision by the Labour National Executive Committee (NEC) to block Burnham’s candidacy provided a crucial boost to the Green campaign. Hannah Spencer was elected as the MP for Gorton and Denton, becoming her party’s first parliamentarian to represent a constituency in the north of England. The Green rout in Gorton and Denton set the scene for the May 2026 elections and the Labour leadership crisis that followed.
Taken together, recent by-election results – from Runcorn and Helsby in May 2025 (Reform gain) to Makerfield and Clacton – form a pretty complete narrative of the development of British politics. At the same time, the signals sent by these contests have proved strikingly consistent. Voters used each by-election as a means of registering dissatisfaction with the status quo.
MDU warns Chancellor clinical negligence system ‘not fit for purpose’
Northern Ireland RE curriculum is ‘indoctrination’ – Supreme Court
The lessons of recent contests remain after Starmer’s resignation, but the landscape has changed. Burnham’s succession has translated into polling gains for Labour; Politico’s poll-of-polls metric has Labour tied with Reform UK, while a series of recent surveys have placed the party in the lead.
This “Burnham bounce” is now set for its first real test in Holborn and St Pancras – provided by Zack Polanski.
Starmer’s resignation immediately prompted speculation that Polanski could stand to succeed him. The Green leader chose not to contest Gorton and Denton, instead signalling an interest in standing in a future London seat should one become available. Starmer’s resignation created that opening, and so Polanski has confirmed his intentions. Speaking to the Camden New Journal, Polanski said he was “excited by the prospect of representing this place in parliament.” Only local members stand between the Green leader and his party’s candidacy in Holborn and St Pancras.
Polanski’s declaration changes the shape of the race.
Firstly, his candidacy will ensure a more competitive contest. In Makerfield, we saw how Burnham’s status and strategy transformed the campaign, dispelling initial concerns that the constituency was prime Reform territory.
Labour’s victory in Holborn and St Pancras in 2024 was comfortable but complicated. Andrew Feinstein, the activist and former member of the South African National Assembly, ran in the then-Labour leader’s constituency on a pro-Palestine, anti-austerity platform, placing second with 7,312 votes (18.9%). The Green Party candidate, David Stansell, came third on 4,030 votes (10.4%). Overall, Starmer dropped 17 points on his 2019 result. These totals point to the existence of a meaningful base of support in the constituency to the left of Labour, which could be energised by a high-stakes campaign fronted by Polanski.
Holborn and St Pancras will be the third by-election in a row contested by a leader of a national party or a de facto leadership candidate. Polanski’s status – leader of the Greens since September 2025 – will ensure stronger cut-through and motivate his supporters. His challenge is to construct a progressive coalition in the constituency, consolidating the left-of-Labour vote.
Polanski’s prominence also strengthens the Green pitch. His central message will be that, while voters may like Burnham or at least prefer him to Starmer, his election would maintain pressure on the government to pursue a progressive agenda. According to this framing, the choice in Holborn and St Pancras is not simply Green versus Labour, or even Polanski versus Burnham – but between placing a prominent progressive voice in parliament or increasing Labour’s substantial majority by one.
Labour will plan to continue the momentum of the Makerfield insurgency. The campaign could point to Burnham’s progressive pedigree and even the criticisms he made of Starmer during his long leadership campaign. Labour will want to secure an endorsement for Burnham’s approach to government, treating the campaign as a de facto vote of confidence.
The Holborn and St Pancras by-election will ultimately be shaped by the tension between Labour’s strengthened national position under Burnham and Polanski’s capacity to consolidate and mobilise the constituency’s progressive base.
Above all, Polanski’s challenge means that the outcome will be of immense national significance, whichever party prevails.
For the Green leader, the contest offers a chance to arrest his party’s recent decline and atone for his own missteps. For the prime minister – whose path to power was shaped by the rise of a credible challenger on Starmer’s left – it presents an opportunity to seize on recent polling gains and inflict a significant setback on the Greens, triggering deeper disillusionment within their ranks.
Victory for Labour would also represent a second by-election triumph for Burnham since June: one in a Reform-facing constituency and the other in Green target territory.
A significant loss for Polanski would surely weaken his hold on the Green Party and risk exposing internal tensions. It would undoubtedly reinforce the prevailing narrative that his standing has waned in recent months, and further complicate claims that the Greens are a genuine rival to Labour’s historic dominance of progressive politics.
But the greatest risk for Polanski would have been not standing at all. That decision would have been treated as unequivocal evidence of both his and his party’s relative decline in recent months.
In Holborn and St Pancras, Polanski has placed himself at the centre of British politics again. He stands ready to reap the rewards or suffer the consequences.
Politics
JD Vance Wants Everyone To Know He Has Friends
Vice President JD Vance spent part of a Thursday press briefing reminding everyone he definitely has friends.
Asked about the departure of Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, who held the role for 18 months, Vance sidelined the question to talk about friendship.
“Dan is obviously a very good friend of mine,” Vance said. “I think he was a great secretary of the Army.”
But Driscoll’s not his only friend!
“Pete [Hegseth] is also a very good friend of mine, and I think he’s an amazing secretary of war, and fundamentally, there are a lot of issues where I agree with Pete on. The issue where I’m in the most strident agreement with Pete is that we needed to have a culture shift at the Department of War,” Vance elaborated.
Asked later in the briefing about his relationship with conservative pundit Tucker Carlson ― who has called for US President Donald Trump to be removed from office — Vance jumped at the opportunity to extol the power of friendship.
“What a travesty it is, that in the United States of America, we let our political disagreements define who our friends are going to be and not going to be,” Vance said. “So yeah, Tucker is a friend of mine. Tucker is a friend, despite the fact that we disagree on a number of things, and I’m not going to play the game where I throw friends under the bus because I disagree with them.”
Asked about news anchor Maria Bartiromo’s sudden departure from Fox News on Thursday, Vance jumped at the opportunity to name another friend.
“She’s a very, very dear friend,” Vance said. “I haven’t even talked to her, so I don’t know the backstory about why she’s decided to leave Fox News.”
But of all Vance’s friends, Secretary of State Marco Rubio is his number one buddy.
“Marco is my best friend in the administration, and he and I work a lot together,” Vance said during a 2025 podcast.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
-
Fashion7 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Maeve – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World1 day agoCLARITY Act could advance within weeks, Atkins says
-
Business6 days agoOnto Innovation Stock: AI’s Next Bottleneck Is Yield (NYSE:ONTO)
-
Crypto World2 days agoElon Musk Says Grok 4.7 Lands in 10 Days and Will Beat Every Model
-
Crypto World6 days agoBitcoin price tests $82K resistance as Brandt stays long
-
Tech5 days agoHugging Face built a $4.5 billion empire on free AI models. Now Nvidia is buying it for $12.9 billion
-
Business7 days agoiPhone 18 Pro Pre-Orders Could Shift to Saturday as Apple Reportedly Avoids September 11 Anniversary
-
Entertainment7 days ago‘Adults’ Creators Break Down Season 2’s Most Shocking Moments and Tease a Potential Season 3
-
Tech6 days agoPaperCut releases second emergency patch for exploited flaws
-
News Videos5 days agoCharlie Munger on Robinhood: No one should believe that Robinhood’s trades are free
-
Crypto World1 day agoKalshi seeks CFTC approval for WTI perpetual
-
Tech5 days agoAs the influencer economy drives retail sales, Seattle startup raises $22M to play matchmaker
-
Crypto World2 days agoBitcoin slips below $77.5K as macro pressure offsets ETF inflows
-
Tech5 days agoTamagotchi Ring Takes the 30-Year Digital Pet and Places it on Your Finger
-
Business2 days agoOil Price Today (September 2): Crude oil nears $97 as war tensions escalate. Will it hit $100 again?
-
Entertainment4 days agoTaylor Swift Reportedly ‘Frustrated’ With Travis Kelce After ‘Short’ Honeymoon
-
Business7 days agoApple Confirms September 9 iPhone Launch Event as Tim Cook Prepares to Hand CEO Reins to John Ternus
-
News Videos5 days agoNews kii Crypto ugu danbeeyey & Suuqa oo dhaqaaqey
-
NewsBeat5 days agoTrump posts AI video of ‘Lake America’ being protected by an army of bequiffed ‘Donald Ducks’
-
Entertainment6 days agoKendall Jenner’s Circle Concerned About Jacob Elordi Romance

You must be logged in to post a comment Login