Politics
Newslinks for Tuesday 17th February 2026
Under pressure Starmer U-turns again. Reform celebrate and Badenoch brands Labour a ‘zombie government’
“Sir Keir Starmer has scrapped plans to delay elections for 4.5 million voters after being warned by government lawyers that the move could be ruled illegal. The prime minister was forced into his 14th U-turn after ditching the policy in the face of a legal challenge from Reform UK. The move increases the political jeopardy for Starmer before May’s elections amid dire poll ratings and continued threats to his leadership. Of the 30 areas where elections had been due to be suspended, 21 are controlled by Labour. Several of these are Reform targets, including Thurrock and Basildon councils in Essex… Labour had announced plans to cancel elections in 30 areas this year to free “capacity” for an overhaul of English council structures over the next three years. Ministers argued that the delays were necessary so councils could save money and officials’ time on holding elections, focusing instead on reorganisation. But the government dropped the plan after receiving ‘new legal advice’” – The Times
- Starmer U-turns on cancelled elections – Daily Telegraph
- Starmer cancels plans to delay 30 local council elections in England – FT
- Humiliated Starmer is forced to face the wrath of voters: In 14th major U-turn of his torrid time in office, PM has to abandon plans to cancel local elections for millions… so will you get to vote on his performance on May 7? – Daily Mail
- Labour now faces local election wipeout. This data proves it – Daily Telegraph
- Starmer abandons plans to delay local elections in England in latest U-turn – Guardian
- When will Starmer’s U-turns end? Council election about-face farce is number 14 for the PM in just 19 months in office – Daily Mail
- The councils thrown into needless chaos by Starmer’s U-turn – Daily Telegraph
- Why has government reversed its decision to postpone 30 local polls across England? – Guardian
- By-election disaster could trigger Starmer resignation, insiders believe – The i
- Starmer U-turns on cancelled local elections: 5 things you need to know – Daily Express
- Keir flip farce. Starmer performs 15th chaotic U-turn in Downing Street climbdown over scrapped council election delay – The Sun
- Keir Starmer’s U-turns so far — from welfare to winter fuel – The Times
- Why Starmer’s latest U-turn over local elections could be a gift for Reform – Guardian
- Farage hails ‘win for democracy’ after PM forced into another U-turn as local elections back on. – The Sun
- English councils face ‘race against time’ to arrange elections, leaders say – Guardian
- ‘It’s game over’: Why Starmer’s fightback looks doomed to fail – The i
Editorial
Comment
- Starmer’s local election rebuff benefits Reform – James Heale, Spectator
- Can anyone govern Britain? – Tim Knox, CapX
Today
Starmer wants to spend £13bn on preparing for war but is told he can’t afford it
“Sir Keir Starmer is planning to ramp up the UK’s military spending but is unlikely to hit a benchmark to spend 3 per cent of national income on defence by 2029, The i Paper understands. Talks are taking place in Whitehall aimed at accelerating a funding uplift for the Ministry of Defence (MoD), but there are concerns in Government about how it will be paid for. On Monday, the BBC reported that Downing Street is considering spending 3 per cent of GDP on defence during the current Parliament, which is due to end in 2029. This compares to a plan set out by Starmer last year to spend 2.6 per cent of GDP by 2027, and 3 per cent by the end of the next parliament in 2034. The accelerated funding has been prompted by increasing Russian aggression and concerns that the US is now a less reliable ally under Donald Trump. Government insiders confirmed …that No 10, the Treasury and the MoD are holding talks to bring forward the spending, with a long-delayed “defence investment plan” the vehicle to announce the uplift. However, the insiders said that it was unlikely that the 3 per cent target would be achieved during this Parliament.” – The i
- PM ready to pay £390m for access to EU’s Ukraine arms fund – The Times
- Starmer set to fast-track defence spending boost – Daily Telegraph
- Keir Starmer says Britain needs to ‘go faster’ on defence spending – FT
- Royal Navy misses £500m of submarine maintenance – The Times
Labour think tank accused of attempting to smear journalists investigating them
“A close ally of the prime minister faces an investigation over allegations he paid a PR firm to investigate two Sunday Times journalists. Josh Simons, the digital government minister in the science department, is accused of paying Apco Worldwide, a US-owned PR firm, to look into journalists reporting on undeclared funding by Labour Together, where he was formerly director. Sir Keir Starmer said the Cabinet Office was investigating the conduct of the think tank after it paid £36,000 to Apco to examine the “backgrounds and motivations” of journalists behind a story before the general election in 2024. The Sunday Times reported that the group had failed to declare £730,000 of donations between 2017 and 2020. The Electoral Commission found the group guilty of 20 breaches of campaign finance laws and issued a fine in 2021.” – The Times
- Dirty dossier. Another blow for Keir Starmer as PM forced to launch probe into Labour think tank accused of smearing journalists – The Sun
- How Labour Together tried to smear Fleet Street – Daily Telegraph
- Cabinet Office to investigate claims a Labour-linked think tank paid for probe into journalists reporting on its ‘secret donations’ – Daily Mail
- Bullying claims against Antonia Romeo ‘covered up’ – The Times
Editorial
- So much for Starmer’s ‘gentler’ politics – latest Labour scandal could be straight from Kremlin dirty tricks department – The Sun
Miliband lambasted by Trump and Tories for ‘inappropriate’ energy deal
“Donald Trump last night tore into Ed Miliband over an “inappropriate” green deal with a Democrat governor. In London, the Energy Secretary and California’s Gavin Newsom signed a “memorandum of understanding” to work together on eco-tech such as offshore wind. Hitting out at the move, the President blasted: “The UK’s got enough trouble without getting involved with Gavin Newscum. Gavin is a loser. Everything he’s touched turns to garbage. His state has gone to hell, and his environmental work is a disaster.” Mr Newsom, a champion of green initiatives, could be the Democrats’ contender at the next US election. Mr Trump warned that “if they did to the UK what he did to California, this will not be a successful venture”. Meanwhile, the Tories accused Net Zero zealot Mr Miliband of double standards over his green deals. Shadow Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho noted the Cabinet Minister published details of the California agreement, but refused to do the same for a similar deal struck with China. She said: “This time, he’s published the full text of the deal online. …but the deal he signed with China remains a secret.” – The Sun
- Trump attacks Miliband over green energy deal with ‘loser’ Newsom – Daily Telegraph
- Ed Miliband strikes clean energy deal with California’s Gavin Newsom – FT
- Trump makes scathing swipe against Ed Miliband’s climate pact with US – Daily Express
- Trump criticises Ed Miliband’s ‘inappropriate’ green deal with California – The Times
Farage set to make Jenrick his Chancellor in waiting
“Nigel Farage is set to confirm his pick for Reform UK’s shadow Chancellor [today] and the choice may come as a surprise to some. The insurgent party leader is set to announce recent defector Robert Jenrick as his new man to take the fight to Rachel Reeves. The news may ruffle the feathers of deputy leader Richard Tice, and head of policy Zia Yusuf, both of whom had been seen as also in the running for the top job. The briefing comes ahead of Mr Farage’s press conference, where he will unveil most of his shadow cabinet. It will be a deliberate move to take on claims that Reform UK is a ‘one man band’ and prove he now has enough top team talent to form a Government after the next election.” – Daily Express
- Money Moves. Jenrick ‘to be Reform’s pick for Chancellor’ as Farage ‘set to announce his key appointments’ – The Sun
- Robert Jenrick to be Reform’s pick for chancellor – The Times
News in Brief
- We all pay for Westminster’s cultural decay – Lawrence Newport, CapX
- Rubio’s charm conceals a brutal truth. Europe’s on its own -Wolfgang Munchau, Unherd
- The “No Debate” dodos – Helen Joyce, The Critic
- Why Russia used poison to kill Navalny – Mark Galeotti, Spectator
Politics
Trans culture war: Stormont minister wades in
LGBTQIA+ advocacy group The Rainbow Project (TRP) have “unequivocally” condemned Northern Ireland Executive health minister Mike Nesbitt’s decision to further perpetuate the discrimination of trans people. Nesbitt has chosen to suspend the region’s participation in a clinical trial of puberty blockers.
This decision runs contrary to the Executive’s stated agreement to participate in this trial, and demonstrates that the apparent need for evidence-gathering and more research are being abandoned in favour of political game-playing and culture wars.
TRP’s Policy Campaigns & Communications Manager Alexa Moore added:
The Executive claimed that its ban on puberty blockers was based on evidence: this decision is very clearly based on politics. This clinical trial was held up by Executive parties across the board as a means by which to gather the evidence for the use of blockers, assess their safety and efficacy, and make a decision on their use on that basis.
Trans communities are bearing the brunt of a political culture that views us as a stick with which to beat political opponents, not as real people with real lives and real healthcare needs. This decision demonstrates that no amount of evidence, no amount of research, no amount of suffering within trans communities will trump the need for politicians to score political points against each other at our expense.
Puberty blockers are, as the name suggests, are a class of drugs that can delay the onset of puberty. They can be used by transgender youth as a means of ensuring their physical characteristics match their gender identity. Their use for under-18s is currently banned in Britain and the North of Ireland. The clinical trial underway across Britain will ostensibly allow further insight into their efficacy.
Nesbitt driven by hatred against trans people rather than evidence
First minister Michelle O’Neill also characterised Nesbitt’s move as political, saying it is “more about inter-unionist rivalry”, and describing it as “disgraceful”. It should be noted that O’Neill’s party Sinn Féin are little better, however. They backed the 2024 outlawing of puberty blockers. That move resulted in various Pride events banning the party, along with others who voted the same way. Criticism of Nesbitt’s latest move is absent from the well populated news feed on the Sinn Féin website, and from O’Neill’s social media feeds.
Nonetheless, there’s little doubt Nesbitt’s move is politically motivated. The health minister is an MLA for the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP). The post on the party’s Facebook page announcing the u-turn clearly indicates the political manoeuvring behind the decision to throw trans people under the bus.
The graphic shown twice mentions the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), seemingly contrasting the UUP’s latest assault on trans rights with a supposedly liberal approach of the DUP. The post singles out the latter for their previous work developing gender health services for children, before going on to boast of the UUP’s move to ban sale and supply of puberty blockers. In reality the DUP are not at all friends of the trans community, and regularly use them as playthings for a pathetic culture war.
The political nature of Nesbitt’s move was further revealed by the nonsensical answers he gave in the Assembly chamber on Monday February 16. He repeatedly claimed to be following the science and expert opinion. If that is the case, why cease a trial that would enable proper scientific conclusions?
He also asserted that his move was to ward off the:
…issue developing into another executive row.
It has now become just that, as opposition parties denounced Nesbitt for his u-turn. People Before Profit’s Gerry Carroll described the suspension as:
…a decision motivated by moral panic and transphobic politicking – not the interests of young people.
Lack of proper care causing suicides among transgender youth
The health minister’s rash decision comes in the aftermath of fresh evidence about the harms of denying young transgender people proper healthcare. A freedom of information (FOI) request by the Good Law Project (GLP) found that:
…in 2021-2022 suicides of trans children in England surged to 22, a marked increase from 5 and 4 the previous two years. This spike follows the decision by NHS England to pull down the shutters on gender affirming healthcare for young trans people following detransitioner Keira Bell’s case against the Tavistock.
Tavistock was a centre for providing healthcare catering to trans people. The GLP previously reported on how minutes from Tavistock’s board meetings indicated they withheld information on deaths “due to reputational impact”. It is illegal to refuse a freedom of information request on these grounds. Whistleblowers who wanted to reveal the spike in suicides were threatened with disciplinary action by Tavistock management.
Health secretary Wes Streeting’s response has been a policy of shooting the messenger. He has attacked those reporting on the way his health service fails transgender youth, rather than fixing the problem.
Streeting is no doubt concerned about attacks from the right should he advocate on behalf of trans people. His Stormont counterpart is the same, driven by fear of the DUP and Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV). Their cravenness will only spell more hardship for an already maligned and marginalised community.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Francesca Albanese further hounded by Zionists
The fake video a number of European governments are using to demand the resignation of Palestinian rights champion Francesca Albanese was created by a UN-accredited Israel lobby group.
The Orwellian-named ‘UN Watch’ claims to exist to hold the UN to its charter. In fact, it is an outright Israel lobby group – but one with access to the corridors of the UN in Geneva. It has unequivocal anti-Albanese form – it tried and failed in 2025 to prevent her re-accreditation as UN special rapporteur for occupied Palestine.
Having failed via the open route to oust Albanese, it is now accused – with evidence – of trying to do it by creating a fake video of her. The video supposedly showed Albanese describing Israel as the ‘common enemy of the world’. This would have been accurate, but was not actually what she had said in her speech.
As former UN human rights commissioner Craig Mokhiber observed, the “despicable” UN Watch has decades of form and has no place anywhere near the UN, but is also invited by US politicians to address them. Mokhiber demanded the withdrawal of its UN credentials:
Notorious Israel regime proxy group, “UN Watch”, set up in the 1990s by former Israel lobbyist and US ambassador Morris Abrams to harass and smear UN human rights defenders on behalf of the regime, is reported (below) to be behind the fabricated video used to attack UN Rapporteur… https://t.co/sFVADfatdI
— Craig Mokhiber (@CraigMokhiber) February 14, 2026
Notorious Israel regime proxy group, “UN Watch”, set up in the 1990s by former Israel lobbyist and US ambassador Morris Abrams to harass and smear UN human rights defenders on behalf of the regime, is reported (below) to be behind the fabricated video used to attack UN Rapporteur
@FranceskAlbs.This despicable group has carried out such dirty tricks at the UN on behalf of the regime for decades with absolute impunity. It perfidiously poses variously as a “watch dog” or human rights group, spreads lies, and smears all critics of the Israeli regime as “antisemites.” And still the UN grants it “ECOSOC consultative status” credentials that allow it UN access to harass and smear UN personnel and disrupt UN proceedings. Like the regime itself, the impunity of this harassment cell has been secured through the active support of the US government (missions) in Geneva and New York.
And Israel lobby-corrupted members of Congress periodically allow them to brief US congressional committees where they regularly slander UN personnel and processes. Its UN credentials must be withdrawn and its impunity must end now. Defenders of colonialism, apartheid, and genocide and serial harassers of UN personnel have no place in the corridors of the UN.
And the evidence appears strong that the lobby group is the origin of the fake video. As policy expert Martin Konečný pointed out, the first appearance of the video online appears to have been in a post by UN Watch director and Israel propagandist Hillel Neuer:
Time to ask who is the original source of the manipulated video of @FranceskAlbs that several European governments jumped on to demand her resignation?
It appears to come from pro-Israel propagandist @HillelNeuer, executive director of @UNWatch. (Says also Grok.👇) https://t.co/fOPgeCoeO9 pic.twitter.com/4LpeqeMS0T
— Martin Konečný (@MartinKonecny) February 14, 2026
To their shame, a number of Western governments have continued to target Francesca Albanese as if the video wasn’t fake, despite knowing it was. Their removal is as essential as that of friends-of-genocide group ‘UN Watch’.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
The Simpsons Boss Names Will Ferrell As Dream Guest Star
Over the years, The Simpsons has welcomed Oscar-winning actors, celebrated music icons, legendary sports stars and even world leaders to the hallowed streets of Springfield.
But after 37 years and 800 episodes, showrunner Matt Selman has admitted there’s one A-lister the team has never quite managed to nab for a Simpsons guest role.
Asked to name his most sought-after guest star during a recent interview with People magazine, the long-running show’s executive producer offered two words: “Will Ferrell.”
“Come on, Will. We keep writing great stuff for you,” Selman then urged the Anchorman star.
The Simpsons started life as a series of short cartoons on Tracey Ullman’s US variety show in the 1980s, before landing its own stand-alone series in 1989.
It has gone on to become the longest-running scripted primetime series in American TV history, celebrating its 800th episode airing earlier this year.
Over the years, guest stars have included everyone from Meryl Streep, Sir Paul McCartney and Johnny Cash to Britney Spears, Angela Bassett and former UK prime minister Tony Blair.
Dustin Hoffman made a memorable guest appearance early on in the show’s run under a pseudonym, while Ricky Gervais guest starred in an episode that he’d written himself.
Back in 2012, Lady Gaga also played herself in an episode centred around the Bad Romance singer paying a visit to Springfield.
Meanwhile, the current season alone is due to feature guest appearances from Lindsay Lohan, Oscar winners Viola Davis and Kieran Culkin, Tony winner Cole Escola and Simpsons regular Albert Brooks.
Last year, it was confirmed that a second spin-off Simpsons film would be hitting cinemas in the summer of 2027, 20 years after the first movie premiered.
The first 36 seasons of The Simpsons are available to stream now on Disney+, with new episodes in the 37th run premiering on the platform weekly.
Politics
Minister Torched By Broadcasters Over Labour’s Latest U-Turn
Broadcasters were exasperated by minister Stephen Kinnock’s explanations for the government’s latest U-turn on local elections this morning.
Labour announced on Monday that “in light of new legal advice” it would no longer be delaying polling day for 30 local authorities.
The government had planned to postpone some votes while reorganising local government structures, insisting this would prevent “zombie” councils.
Critics claimed it was a political move designed to stop Labour losing in the local elections.
However, a legal challenge from Reform UK pushed the government to drop its plans and agreed to shell out for the claimant’s legal fees.
The reverse-ferret means Labour has made more than a dozen U-turns since getting into power less than two years ago.
On BBC Radio 4′s Today programme, host Nick Robinson pondered whether Labour are “blaming the lawyers” as he tore into Kinnock over this latest disaster.
Robinson said: “How on earth is it in the best interest of the British taxpayer to pay for Nigel Farage’s legal bills, because you did something that was going to be judged illegal in court?”
“I’m definitely not pretending that the change in the legal position is ideal,” Kinnock replied. “We hold our hands up and recognise that we had a piece of legal advice and then things have changed.”
“So are politicians blaming the lawyers?” Robinson asked.
“No, not at all. We had a process that we went through and then that changed,” the care minister said.
The presenter hit back: “Doesn’t it insult our listeners’ intelligence to pretend this is anything other than what it was – an attempt by Labour ministers to postpone inconvenient elections that you looked set to lose because the opinion polls are against you?”
“No it was a consultation with local authorities who said they were really going to struggle to make this happen,” the minister said. “That’s why we’ve made £63 million available to actually facilitate that and enable those changes to take place.”
Kinnock sparked similar frustration on Sky News when he tried to say it’s a mixture of parties would have been impacted by the delay to the local elections.
But presenter Kamali Melbourne corrected him: “The majority are Labour.”
He added: “Sorry, Mr Kinnock, with all due respect we know the argument. I’m asking you why you changed your mind at the last minute yesterday?
“What was different between the legal advice you got then versus previously? Because you must have got legal advice before.”
“I’m a minister in the Department of Health and Social Care. I’m not a minister in the ministry of Housing and Local Government,” Kinnock replied, as Melbourne sighed loudly.
Kinnock continued: “So I haven’t seen the advice itself you’d need to talk to one of my ministerial colleagues in MHCLG on that.”
“It seems perfectly reasonable that you got legal advice, you got new legal advice, you changed your mind,” Melbourne said. “But when it is the 15th time you have changed your mind on something, it starts to seem a bit unreasonable, it seems like you don’t quite know what you’re doing as you’re going forward, leading this country.”
And on ITV’s Good Morning Britain, presenter Richard Madeley took a wider approach about Starmer’s authority.
He said: “How confident are you this morning in your party leader? In the prime minister? He nearly went down for the third time last week, it was very, very close.”
He pointed out that Starmer had suggested to BBC Radio 2′s Jeremy Vine that he would not do any more U-turns hours before the announcement came in.
Kinnock simply insisted that changing leaders “every five minutes” is not good for the country and it’s “terrible” for the economy and investment.
Politics
Olivia Blake: ‘Can climate adaptation strengthen UK national security?’
We are at a critical juncture marked by growing global uncertainty. The institutions and mechanisms that once sustained the post war era are being weakened or dismantled, with consequences that are no longer distant or abstract but increasingly felt by our constituents here at home.
But responding to this upheaval means recognising that today’s national security threats are deeply intertwined with climate change and ecosystem breakdown. As the world moves closer to dangerous tipping points, the risks of food insecurity, conflict and resource scarcity grow, further destabilising the international system and feeding directly into the pressures communities are already experiencing.
These pressures are compounded by president Trump’s withdrawal from key climate agreements, with the fracturing of international cooperation now accelerating the destruction of the ecosystems that sustain us all here in the UK.
As the government’s own national security assessment warned, every global critical ecosystem we depend on is now on a path towards collapse. This would mean failing crops, soaring food bills, economic insecurity, and a much higher risk of pandemics. The threat is not limited to countries: the recent IPBES assessment in Manchester found that every business relies on nature’s services and faces existential risk if it does not actively protect and restore ecosystems.
MDU warns Chancellor clinical negligence system ‘not fit for purpose’
Northern Ireland RE curriculum is ‘indoctrination’ – Supreme Court
It’s this impact of ecosystem breakdown on UK security and prosperity that means we must urgently raise our ambition to protect our constituents’ homes, livelihoods and finances. Preparedness must be built into policy from the outset, recognising the climate impacts we will be facing in the future, not just today, and enabling nature-based solutions and restoration to be delivered at a far greater pace and scale, as one of our most powerful tools for protecting people.
This does not replace our ambitious mitigation goals and our clean energy superpower mission; instead it recognises today’s realities and our responsibility to safeguard the public and the economy. As former senior military commander Lieutenant General Richard Nugee recently observed at the national emergency Briefing, we must confront threats as they are, not as we wish them to be.
Increasing our ambition on adaptation faces this threat, but it is also an opportunity to define a clear mission that delivers tangible benefits for communities across the UK and demonstrates the capacity to act decisively. We know that responding to the climate and nature crises has huge economic benefits, but at a time of eroding trust and rising public demand for change, rolling out adaptation measures is among the most powerful ways to improve people’s everyday lives here and now.
From keeping local sports pitches playable and safeguarding commuter routes, to supporting farmers’ livelihoods while easing the food inflation that has strained household budgets. These are the changes that can make a meaningful difference for millions across Britain. They shift the focus away from abstract growth figures and towards the everyday. Adaptation measures may sound technical, but simply put, they will help to lower household costs, protect communities from extreme weather and limit the disruption to people’s lives.
This is also a depolarising approach to climate and nature action. Every one of us here in parliament represents communities already experiencing the effects of extreme weather, and protecting the people we serve must rise above party politics. As polling consistently shows, we are a nature-proud nation and by restoring our natural environment, we not only reduce the risk of climate shocks but also safeguard the places we proudly call home.
As chair of the newly formed Climate and Nature Crisis Caucus, I am determined that climate adaptation is firmly on the political agenda. This is not a battle between mitigation or adaptation, it is recognising that they must be done together, as the impacts of extreme weather are happening now and will get worse, whether we like it or not.
The government should show bold leadership and make this case, confronting the opposition head on. The future security and prosperity of the UK is at stake. We must call out those who seek to delay or distract, those who are sowing division for personal gain rather than protecting and bringing our communities together.
We are fortunate that the British public strongly support action on climate and nature, often more than we in parliament realise. We must not take that support for granted. To ensure that climate denialism does not take root in our politics, the benefits of addressing climate change and biodiversity loss must be tangible – and felt quickly. Adaptation is the key: safeguarding communities, restoring trust, and securing our future.
Politics.co.uk is the UK’s leading digital-only political website. Subscribe to our daily newsletter for all the latest news and analysis.
Politics
Eurovision Announces UK Act For 2026 Song Contest
Eurovision commentator Graham NortonThe experimental singer-songwriter Sam Battle – better known by the stage name Look Mum No Computer – will be representing the UK at Eurovision in 2026.
Look Mum No Computer will be performing on behalf of the United Kingdom in Vienna in May, where the annual Song Contest will return following JJ’s victory in last year’s live final.
His competing song will be unveiled at a later date.
It's official! LOOK MUM NO COMPUTER will represent the United Kingdom at the Eurovision Song Contest 2026
Learn more ➡️ https://t.co/ZcbBNWiPDjpic.twitter.com/CVmodB3qcp— BBC Press Office (@bbcpress) February 17, 2026
In an official statement on Tuesday morning, he said: “I find it completely bonkers to be jumping on this wonderful and wild journey. I have always been a massive Eurovision fan, and I love the magical joy it brings to millions of people every year, so getting to join that legacy and fly the flag for the UK is an absolute honour that I am taking very seriously.
“I’ve been working a long-time creating, writing, and producing my own visions from scratch, and documenting my process. I will be bringing every ounce of my creativity to my performances, and I can’t wait for everyone to hear and see what we’ve created. I hope Eurovision is ready to get synthesised!”
More to follow.
Politics
America’s Next Top Model Documentary Producer Addresses Tyra Banks’ Involvement
The team behind the new documentary Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model have opened up about Tyra Banks’ participation.
Premiering on Monday, the three-part series charts the rise of America’s Next Top Model in the 2000s, as well as tackling some of its thornier and more controversial moments.
Many were surprised to see that Tyra agreed to be interviewed for the series, facing questions about her role as the host, head judge and executive producer of America’s Next Top Model, as well as her involvement in some of the show’s more shocking moments.
And in case there was any doubt, executive producer Vanessa Golembewski has now clarified that Tyra was not given any special treatment as an interviewee.
“From the beginning, this documentary took an incredible amount of trust,” Golembewski told Tudum.
“Tyra’s perspective was always important to the series, but it was just as important that her involvement was as an interview subject only. She afforded us the same level of trust as everyone else who participates in the documentary.
“She never asked to have any creative input or control, and she’s seeing the footage for the first time alongside the rest of the world.”
Reality Check, the much-hyped Top Model documentary, has received generally positive reviews from critics, although most were also in agreement that producers could have been more forensic in their questioning, especially when it came to Tyra.
The former supermodel executive produced all 24 seasons of America’s Next Top Model, and hosted all but one, with Rita Ora filling in for her as host and head judge on one cycle in the mid-2010s.
Near the end of Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model, Tyra teased that a new season of the divisive reality show is in the works, telling viewers: “I feel like my work is not done.
“You have no idea what we have planned for Cycle 25.”
Politics
Trump’s Latest Epstein Denial Has Critics Asking New Questions
President Donald Trump’s critics aren’t buying his latest claim about the files related to his former friend, the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
“I have nothing to hide. I’ve been exonerated. I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Monday evening. “They went in hoping that they’d find it and found just the opposite. I’ve been totally exonerated.”
He used the phrase “totally exonerated” at least two more times during the exchange.
The files do not offer new evidence of wrongdoing by Trump. However, Trump – who was once close to Epstein – is mentioned frequently, and the documents are so heavily redacted that critics say many questions remain.
Representative Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) last week said he searched the unredacted files available to lawmakers for “Don,” “Donald” and “Trump” and received more than 1 million results.
Trump on Monday also insisted that ”[Bill and Hillary] Clinton and many other Democrats have been pulled in” by the documents.
However, those same documents have also raised new questions about members of his own administration and inner circle.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services administrator Mehmet Oz and former White House strategist Steve Bannon have all been named in the documents, often suggesting closer ties to Epstein than previously known.
Several other prominent members of the administration also appear in the files.
One of Trump’s fellow Republicans, Representative Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), on Sunday even gave the Trump administration a new name as a result.
“This is the Epstein administration,” Massie said on This Week as he accused Trump and Trump’s allies of working to protect the names in the files instead of seeking justice for the victims.
Trump’s critics on X also didn’t buy his “totally exonerated” claim:
Politics
Harry Enten Hits Trump With Brutal Warning Ahead Of Midterms
CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten said on Monday he usually compares President Donald Trump’s underwater approval ratings to Olympic divers such as Greg Louganis.
But in the latest polls, Trump has taken such a deep plunge that Enten said he is at a loss.
“I don’t really know who to even compare Donald Trump to because he’s just so low,” Enten said. “And he’s so low with the center of the electorate.”
Enten pointed out that Trump is now 27 points underwater among independents, according to one new poll, compared to 17 below at this point in his first term.
“When you lose the centre of the electorate, you lose the American people,” Enten said.
He warned Trump that this could spell disaster for Republicans in November’s midterm elections, when control of the House and possibly even the Senate ― both currently under Republican control ― will be at stake.
“I don’t understand how this works out well for the president of the United States,” he said. “When you are 27 points below water, underwater, with the center of the electorate, with independents, you lose. Your party loses.”
The latest numbers also led Enten to a key question about Trump’s approval ratings.
“There’s this question that folks keep asking: Where is the floor for Donald Trump?” he said. “And I’m not sure there is a floor, because if there is one, Donald Trump, at least in term number two, has just fallen through it to another low level.”
Enten displayed the latest results from four different pollsters showing Trump ranging from 19 points underwater all the way to 26 points below water in his approval ratings.
Trump, he said, is now 22 points underwater on average ― well beneath the -17 from the same point in his first term, and the -13 that Joe Biden had at this point in his presidency.
“So the bottom line is this: Donald Trump is setting new records for himself in term number two,” he said. “And he’s doing worse than Joe Biden, which is, of course the comparison that Donald Trump does not want to be, because we all know what happened to Joe Biden.”
Biden’s unpopularity cost his party control of Congress in the 2022 midterm elections, and he eventually had to drop his reelection bid.
Check out his full segment below:
Politics
Can Starmer ever get it right first time in his U-turn administration?
At the election, Sir Keir Starmer promised change. It was the front page of his Labour Party’s manifesto. A massive photo of him with ‘Change’ emblazoned over it. He has proven good at one form of change; changing his mind.
On the radio yesterday morning Sir Keir Starmer was asked about the number of U-turns his government had made. At that time he had racked up 13. It is worth seeing the full scale written down to understand the real impact: Digital ID cards; Pub’s business rates; Farm tax; Income tax hike; NICS increase; Waspi women compensation; Winter Fuel payments; Benefits cuts; Two child benefit cap; Grooming gangs inquiry; Trans rights defenition; Day-one workers rights; Debt fiscal rules.
He boasted that the reason behind them is because “I am a pragmatist. I am a common-sense merchant”. Would he stick to his course, Starmer was asked: “Absolutely. I know exactly why I was elected in with a five-year mandate to change this country for the better, and that’s what I intend to do.” Rather hilariously when his interview was finished on BBC 2, they played a song by Duffy: ‘Mercy.’
Starmer will be begging for it because just an hour and forty minutes later, he had got to U-turn number 14 – and one of the biggest of them all. Showing he’s not just struggling to control the steering, he has fallen asleep at the wheel. The government threw in the towel under legal threat and restored plans for their cancelled local elections.
“Predictable chaos from a useless government that cannot make basic decisions,” posted Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader. “This is a zombie government. U-turn after U-turn after U-turn.”
After spending all the political capital and energy on Labour’s decision to cancel elections to around 30 councils in England and deny some 4.5 million people their vote in May, yet another U-turn took place, leaving local councils having to work against constrained timetables, political parties scrambling for candidates and more government spending wasted first on cancelling them and now hurriedly rescheduling them (the BBC reports £63m put aside to help councils with additional costs). Oh and that is not the end of the extent money has been wasted – the government is now having to pay the legal fees of their challenger: Reform UK.
So ahead of major local elections and an upcoming byelection in what should be Labour heartland, in Manchester’s Gorton and Denton, the Labour government have been forced to U-turn and pay out to one of their political rivals.
Reform’s legal appeal saw lawyers proposing to argue the Government was misusing powers under the Local Government Act 2000 never intended to allow for the postponement of elections, other than in exceptional circumstances. But if there were always legal problems as this lawsuit revealed, it needs to be explained how this got through government processes in the first place. That is something the Tories have already called on.
Shadow housing secretary James Cleverly, amidst calling for Steve Reed’s resignation, wrote to the Local Government Secretary: “What new factors were considered in the re-decision that led to a different conclusion being drawn? (In both cases, whilst the Government does not normally disclose its legal advice, there is a strong public interest for the rationale for the decision-making to be made clear).”
Reed had been defending his decision up until recently as Labour claimed that the looming reorganisation of local authorities would make elections expensive, complicated and unnecessary. But, in a letter published yesterday, he said that he was withdrawing his decision “in the light of recent legal advice”.
With thousands of lawyers at their disposal, we are somehow expected to believe none of them ever raised an issue to Reed’s department that would have prevented it from getting this far. It would have saved a lot of time and money had he sought their advice to begin with. Or, of course, perhaps there is a world where this was a political decision to hide the Labour government’s blushes amid poor results, no matter the legal position, and previous legal advice was ignored.
Polling had shown 10 Labour authorities would be wiped out if the elections were to go ahead.
As the shadow Attorney General questioned: “It’s hard to see what has changed as a matter of law.”
According to The Guardian, government sources say Reed was warned the delays could lead to a legal challenge, but that it only became clear once a review had been lodged by Nigel Farage that the government was likely to lose it. How embarrassing.
For how long Labour insisted it was a decision based on local choice, to succumb to a legal threat shows their claims of regard for local democracy were pure tosh. Labour MPs were right in telling Starmer, these U-turns (and often the policy positions in the first place) do make them look “really stupid”.
-
Sports5 days agoBig Tech enters cricket ecosystem as ICC partners Google ahead of T20 WC | T20 World Cup 2026
-
Tech6 days agoSpaceX’s mighty Starship rocket enters final testing for 12th flight
-
Video18 hours agoBitcoin: We’re Entering The Most Dangerous Phase
-
Tech2 days agoLuxman Enters Its Second Century with the D-100 SACD Player and L-100 Integrated Amplifier
-
Video4 days agoThe Final Warning: XRP Is Entering The Chaos Zone
-
Tech6 hours agoThe Music Industry Enters Its Less-Is-More Era
-
Crypto World7 days agoBlockchain.com wins UK registration nearly four years after abandoning FCA process
-
Crypto World3 days agoBhutan’s Bitcoin sales enter third straight week with $6.7M BTC offload
-
Crypto World5 days agoPippin (PIPPIN) Enters Crypto’s Top 100 Club After Soaring 30% in a Day: More Room for Growth?
-
Video5 days agoPrepare: We Are Entering Phase 3 Of The Investing Cycle
-
NewsBeat2 days agoThe strange Cambridgeshire cemetery that forbade church rectors from entering
-
Business5 days agoBarbeques Galore Enters Voluntary Administration
-
Crypto World6 days agoCrypto Speculation Era Ending As Institutions Enter Market
-
Crypto World5 days agoEthereum Price Struggles Below $2,000 Despite Entering Buy Zone
-
Politics7 days agoWhy was a dog-humping paedo treated like a saint?
-
NewsBeat2 days agoMan dies after entering floodwater during police pursuit
-
Crypto World3 days agoBlackRock Enters DeFi Via UniSwap, Bitcoin Stages Modest Recovery
-
NewsBeat3 days agoUK construction company enters administration, records show
-
Sports6 days agoWinter Olympics 2026: Australian snowboarder Cam Bolton breaks neck in Winter Olympics training crash
-
Crypto World4 days agoKalshi enters $9B sports insurance market with new brokerage deal
