Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

Real Madrid embroiled in yet another Islamophobia row

Published

on

Real Madrid embroiled in yet another Islamophobia row

Real Madrid is facing an unprecedented storm of controversy after a disastrous European night, both on and off the pitch, following their 2-1 defeat to Bayern Munich in the first leg of the 2025-2026 Champions League quarter-finals. The match not only complicated their continental campaign but also ignited a major crisis off the field.

On the pitch, the Royal Club appeared unable to keep up with Bayern’s pace, suffering a loss that foreshadows a disastrous end to the season and significantly diminishes their chances of competing for titles. This has led to harsh criticism directed at the players and coaching staff, making it one of the most frustrating nights for their fans.

But, their football is the least of their problems.

Real Madrid have an Islamophobia problem

But what happened in the stands was far more serious than the result itself, after videos surfaced showing shocking racist chants by some Real Madrid fans, directly targeting Muslims with the phrase: “Anyone who doesn’t jump is a Muslim.” This incident has brought back to the forefront one of the most sensitive issues in European football.

Advertisement

The same chant had previously caused a stir during a friendly match between Spain and Egypt, revealing a worrying pattern of recurring behavior, not just an isolated incident.

Spanish football under scrutiny

These developments come at a highly sensitive time, especially with FIFA’s move to open an official investigation into the previous incident during the friendly match against Egypt. This puts the reputation of Spanish football at stake and threatens repercussions that could extend beyond traditional sanctions, potentially impacting Spain’s hosting of the 2030 World Cup.

This latest incident is just the latest in a long series of racist abuse incidents within Spanish stadiums, the most prominent victims of which have been Brazilian star Vinicius Junior, along with other prominent names like Lamine Yamal, Kylian Mbappé, and Ansu Fati. This situation reflects a crisis that runs deeper than mere individual transgressions.

Advertisement

Amid this storm, Real Madrid finds itself compelled to act swiftly, cooperating with Spanish authorities to identify and hold accountable those involved, in an attempt to contain the fallout from the scandal. This is particularly important given that similar incidents in 2024 resulted in the arrest of several fans inside the Santiago Bernabéu stadium.

Between a loss that threatens its season and a scandal that tarnishes its global image, Real Madrid faces a true test, not only to salvage its European campaign but also to protect its reputation from further damage in a battle that now transcends the boundaries of football.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Horse death toll sparks renewed calls for Aintree boycott

Published

on

Horse death toll sparks renewed calls for Aintree boycott

National animal welfare charity the League Against Cruel Sports is calling for a boycott of the Aintree Festival and Grand National race. And it wants to see government intervention to tackle the terrible death toll of horses.

Animal Aid has compiled figures showing that 67 horses have died racing at the festival since the year 2000. 17 horses died after racing in centrepiece race the Grand National.

The League has criticised the British Horseracing Authority and Jockey Club for prioritising gambling profits over the lives of horses.

Emma Slawinski, League Against Cruel Sports chief executive, said:

Advertisement

We are calling on the public and businesses to boycott the Aintree Festival and Grand National, to avoid betting on the races and to switch off the ITV Coverage and advertising which glosses over the cruelty.

The government needs to step in and ensure the welfare of the horses is put before the profits of gambling companies and the horse racing industry.

The British Horseracing Authority is failing the horses used in racing and the death toll keeps on rising every year – I would be delighted but very surprised if we won’t be reporting on more deaths over the next three days of the festival.

Horses will be sacrificed for people’s entertainment, something that should repel a nation of animal lovers.

At 2025’s Aintree Festival, Willy De Houelle died on the first day of racing. Celebre D’Allen died two days after competing in the Grand National.

Advertisement

The League is also calling for a ban on the use of the whip in horse racing. Sweden implemented such a ban in 2022 over concerns for horse welfare.

Slawinski added:

There needs to be a ban on the whip which is being cruelly used to inflict pain and push horses beyond their capabilities.

Horses are being raced to their deaths. The government needs to step in and ensure that the welfare of horses becomes the number one priority and end the sickening death toll which grows ever higher each year the Aintree Festival is held.

Action needs to be taken to stop the British Horseracing Authority and the festival organisers from putting gambling profits before the welfare of the horses.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Israel intensifies attacks on Lebanon, striking children

Published

on

Israel intensifies attacks on Lebanon, striking children

Israel has stepped up its illegal attacks on civilian infrastructure in Lebanon, despite a ceasefire agreement which mediators from Pakistan say includes Lebanon.

Reports indicate that 50 Israeli fighter jets dropped 160 bombs on various parts of Lebanon, all within one minute.

Advertisement

Israel has not hit Lebanon this hard since 1982.

Israel also targeted an ambulance in Qlaileh, southern Lebanon. The attack killed four paramedics.

In Beirut alone, the death toll today has already risen to 500 after only half a day of the Zionists carpet-bombing the city.

Advertisement

The terrorist state even bombed a funeral. No amount of dead brown people will ever be enough for Israel.

Israel is murdering Lebanese people while they mourn.

Advertisement

False pretences

As usual, Israel’s standard excuse for bombing brown people is ‘defeating terrorists’. In this case, in Lebanon, it’s ‘defeating Hezbollah’. Of course, everyone with even half a working brain can see that’s bullshit.

Remember that Hezbollah, just like Hamas, would not exist if it weren’t for Israel’s illegal invasions.

Meanwhile, Israel bombs hospitals, ambulances, and other civilian infrastructure, in clear contravention of international law, and gets away with it.

Hezbollah was formed in 1982 after Israel illegally invaded Lebanon. Its main foundational goal was to fight the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon. The group’s resistance to Israeli occupation was instrumental in the IOF leaving Lebanon in 2000, after 18 years.

Armed resistance is not illegal under international law. A United Nations General Assembly resolution states:

The General Assembly,

Reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial domination, apartheid and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle;

Israel and the West have labelled both Hezbollah and Hamas as ‘terrorist groups’ and called for their disarmament – when they’re only defending the land they are native to.

Advertisement

Hezbollah abided by the ceasefire agreement, whilst the Zionist entity did not.

Senior Iranian officials have told Al Jazeera that it will ‘punish’ Israel for ‘crimes’ it has committed in Lebanon.

The Zionist entity is committing constant atrocities with zero consequences. As usual, the goal is to destroy any chances of a lasting ceasefire. Because that way, Israel’s ‘greater Israel‘ project becomes all the more realistic.

Advertisement

‘God’s chosen people’ are sure causing a lot of death and destruction, which seems a little bit like the opposite of what a loving god would want for its people. Either Israelis have a very weird definition of god, or they’re simply using their religion as an excuse to bomb the shit out of brown people.

Featured image via CNN-News18/YouTube

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Senedd candidate challenges rivals over disability cuts

Published

on

Senedd candidate challenges rivals over disability cuts

Plans to cut £200 a month from new Universal Credit claims for those unable to work came into force the start of April. This has sparked a fierce challenge from a Gŵyr Abertawe (Swansea West & Gower) Senedd candidate.

Ben Golightly, the lead candidate for the Welsh Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) and a disability activist, claims the outgoing Welsh government has allowed Westminster to “turn the clock back” on disability rights by failing to stand up for disabled people:

These cuts are biting now, and they were voted for by 25 out of 26 Welsh Labour MPs. It was not good enough for the first minister, as leader of the Welsh Labour party, to say ‘it’s up to them’. The next Welsh government must do better.

That inability to stand up to Keir Starmer undermines the outgoing Welsh government’s ambitions and achievements – some of it world-leading in fact, like the Disability Rights Taskforce – and turns the clock backwards on disabled people’s quality of life.

The TUSC candidate also exposed a “black hole” in local planning, citing documents presented to Swansea Council’s budget meeting last month. These reveal the authority had made “no provision” for:

Advertisement

any increased costs or reductions in income arising from changes to welfare reform.

Golightly explained that welfare cuts would lead to increasing demand for services, while simultaneously reducing the council’s ability to charge for them, as residents’ incomes tumble.

He concluded:

I challenged the councillors on this at public questions. Some of those councillors – who either voted in favour of the budget or merely abstained – are now Senedd candidates: Labour, Green and Lib-Dem. I am standing to hold their feet to the fire and keep the fight for disabled people’s rights firmly on the agenda as a socialist voice for the Senedd.

Featured image via Disabled People Against Cuts Cymru

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer Takes Thinly-Veiled Swipe At Donald Trump As Iran Ceasefire Begins

Published

on

Relations between the two men are at an all-time low.
Relations between the two men are at an all-time low.Relations between the two men are at an all-time low.

Keir Starmer has taken a thinly-veiled swipe at Donald Trump – but insisted the pair’s relationship is not “in tatters”.

The prime minister refused to directly respond to the US president after he compared him to Adolf Hitler appeaser Neville Chamberlain.

That came after Trump said Starmer was “not Winston Churchill” over his decision not to initially let US jets mount launch bombing raids on Iran from RAF bases.

The PM has also rejected the president’s calls for the UK to send warships to the Gulf to help re-open the Strait of Hormuz.

Starmer flew to Saudi Arabia in the immediate aftermath of a two-week ceasefire being agreed between Iran, America and Israel.

Advertisement

He is due to have talks with leaders in the region on re-opening the strait.

Asked by reporters if his relationship with Trump was now “in tatters”, the PM said it wasn’t.

But he insisted he was right to act “in the British national interest” by refusing to join a war that he believes breaks international law.

He said: “I’ve acted as you would expect of a British prime minister, which is by being absolutely focused on what is our national interest, and that’s why I’ve applied my principles and my values throughout.

Advertisement

“And my principles and values made sure that our decisions were that we wouldn’t get involved in the action without a lawful basis, without a viable, thought-through plan.

“That was the right position for the United Kingdom, and of course, that has included us taking action, collective self-defence.”

He added: “I’m the British prime minister. I act in the British national interest, but nothing, but nothing, is going to deflect me from that.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Everyone’ to defy UK government’s farcical ‘cat and mouse’ game of arrests

Published

on

'Everyone' to defy UK government’s farcical ‘cat and mouse’ game of arrests

On Saturday 11 April 2026, thousands of ordinary, peace-loving people will gather in Trafalgar Square, London. They’ll be there in open defiance of the UK government’s misguided crackdown on peaceful protest. This peaceful vigil, called ‘Everyone Day’, will demonstrate the unwaning resistance to the ban on Palestine Action. The UK government unlawfully proscribed this direct action movement as a ‘terrorist group’, paving the way for numerous arrests.

The action will be a peaceful vigil, with people sitting down holding their handwritten paper signs. The signs will carry the by now world-famous words:

I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action

Since July 2025, nearly 2,800 people have been arrested under terrorism legislation for holding these signs during peaceful vigils, as part of what was described as the “most widespread mass civil disobedience in modern UK history”.

In February, the High Court ruled that the government’s proscription of Palestine Action was unlawful and disproportionate. The effect of this judgment has been stayed to allow for the government to appeal.

Advertisement

The Met flip-flopping over arrests

Shortly after the ruling, the Metropolitan police issued a clear public statement that they would not arrest people for publicly displaying support for Palestine Action. Instead, the Met said that ‘gathering intelligence’ was the most proportionate action it could take. Only a few weeks later, the Met contradicted this public position by arresting a woman on a peaceful march.

In the weeks that followed, the Met issued a further statement marking a complete U-turn, saying that it would be arresting people after all. It is unclear what prompted this reassessment of proportionality other than correspondence from Defend Our Juries and the organisation of Everyone Day.

The Met’s U-Turn has come under fire, with leading law firm Hodge Jones & Allen arguing that any arrests would be unlawful. Nonetheless, a further 19 people have been arrested for showing support for Palestine Action since the policy change, with further arrests expected during Saturday’s action.

A spokesperson from Defend Our Juries said:

Advertisement

The protest against the proscription of Palestine Action has grown beyond a question of the right to protest. The actions of the UK government and police following the High Court’s ruling expose what many have long known: democracy in the UK is on its knees.

The government’s refusal to accept the judgment of the country’s highest court, coupled with inconsistent and opaque policing decisions, signals a troubling disregard for the rule of law. These are not the actions of institutions committed to protecting citizens, but of a state prioritising its own authority.

This campaign now extends far beyond Palestine Action, beyond Gaza, and beyond the principles of protest and free speech. It speaks to a fundamental erosion of the right to dissent and to hold power to account. This is no longer a marginal issue – it concerns everyone who values democratic freedoms.

Defend Our Juries reminds those planning to attend Everyone Day to read the Action Briefing in full before attending, which includes important legal information. It reminds participants to not have on their person any incriminating bits of paper, sharp items, valuables, drugs (except labelled prescription), phones with sensitive information, or items used to ‘lock on’.

Defend Our Juries gently reminds all attendees, whether sitting vigil participants or spectators, that this is a peaceful vigil and asks everyone to respect this.

Advertisement

Featured image via Defend Our Juries

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Israel are bloodthirsty – and mainstream media are backing them

Published

on

Israel are bloodthirsty - and mainstream media are backing them

The legacy media are fluffing their Israel reporting again. The Guardian reported on 8 March 2026 that “Israel hits Lebanon with massive wave of airstrikes amid ceasefire uncertainty”. This is, at best, a half truth.

There’s uncertainty about the ‘when’ of the tentative ceasefire between Iran and the US, sure. Not least on the ground in the affected countries. As Al Jazeera’s Heidi Pett reported:

The Israeli army launched what it said were 100 air strikes at multiple locations across Lebanon in a span of 10 minutes.

I am at the scene of one of them in central Beirut. The devastation is extraordinary. These strikes came without warning. They came at a moment of confusion across Lebanon as to whether the regional ceasefire applied here.

But the ‘what’ of Israel’s plans in Lebanon is as clear as day and at least as old as Israel itself: Zionism demands the settler-colonial state batters Lebanon into submission and colonises large swathes of it. How’s that for ‘uncertainty’?

Advertisement

And the current assault, it is being reported, rivals the 1982 war for violence:

Al Jazeera Arabic’s bureau chief in Lebanon, Mazen Ibrahim, says that many in the capital have been reminded today of Israel’s invasion of Beirut in 1982.

Israel, America’s attack dog in the region, could well wreck this fragile ceasefire. You can read our analysis of the scale and scope of the current attack here.

Israel: the ‘ceasefire’ terms are clear

The Iranian terms for a two week cessation of hostilities, which have been accepted by the US in a Pakistan-China brokered deal, contain a number of points. One of these is:

Halting the war on all resistance fronts, “including against the heroic Islamic resistance of Lebanon” (Hezbollah)

A later version of the demands reportedly expands this slightly:

Advertisement

The “necessity to end the war” against all Resistance axis factions – fronts listed in the document include Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen, Palestine (occupied territories) – described as the “historic defeat of the child-killing Israeli regime’s aggression”

Read for yourself:

Now, you can quibble over the wording but an end to Israel’s attack on Lebanon is a load-bearing strut in this ceasefire.

So what was Israel’s response to this chance for even a moment of respite? In the Israel Occupation Forces’ (IOF) own words:

Advertisement

the largest coordinated strike across Lebanon since the start of Operation Roaring Lion.

The fact that Israel remains the primary aggressor – even at the potential cost of wrecking a fragile ceasefire – should be central to ANY reportage. That Israel might wreck the tentative agreement intentionally is a whole other can of worms. One that we – and any media outlet worth its salt – should have the courage to crack open.

Advertisement

Israel’s ambition in Lebanon

Al-Jazeera reported on 8 March that Israeli military chief Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir said:

We will continue to strike the terrorist organisation Hezbollah and seize every opportunity.

We will not compromise on the security of the [Israeli] residents of the North. We will continue to attack without pause.

And Israeli Defense Minister Katz said:

Hundreds of Hezbollah terrorists were attacked in a surprise strike on headquarters across Lebanon in the largest concentrated blow Hezbollah has absorbed since Operation Buzzers… We warned Naim Qassem that Hezbollah will pay a very heavy price for attacking Israel on Iran’s behalf – and Naim Qassem’s personal turn will come too.

Underneath the usual reference to ‘terrorists’ and ‘security’ the same old colonial ambitions are what drives the Israeli state machine.

Advertisement

And within hours of the ceasefire plan being publicised, Iran – which had to some degree reopened the vital oil channel through the Straits of Hormuz – reportedly closed it in direct response to the Israeli attack on Lebanon:

Underpinning colonial ambitions

Israel are not getting it all their own way. As the Canary reported on 4 April, the settler-colonial state could still face humiliation:

Advertisement

Israel’s invasion and attempted annexation of southern Lebanon has been portrayed as a sideshow to the war in Iran. And legacy media coverage has tended to miss out details of stubborn resistance to the Israeli military campaign.

Meanwhile, Israel’s far-right finance minister Bezalel Smotrich made it very clear that the Israeli invasion has colonialist, expansionist aims.

Reuters reported on 23 March 2026:

Smotrich told an Israeli radio program that the military campaign in Lebanon “needs to end with a different reality entirely, both with the Hezbollah ​decision but also with the change of Israel’s borders.”

Smotrich added:

I say here definitively…in every room and in every discussion, too: the new Israeli border must be the Litani.

Smotrich is the leader of a small far-right party in a coalition government. He may not call all the shots with regard to Israeli strategy. He nevertheless represents a widely and deeply-held expansionist desire at the heart of Israel’s settler colonial polity. In Zionism’s ethno-nationalist fever-dream, Lebanon—and even lands far beyond it—are already part of Israel.

Foiled for the moment in the long-dreamed-of war with Iran it helped push the erratic US president into, Israel is still eager to pursue its ambitions in Lebanon – even at the risk of wrecking the ceasefire and re-igniting the hot war with Iran.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

FIFA opens investigation into racism against Muslims in Spain

Published

on

FIFA opens investigation into racism against Muslims in Spain

FIFA has opened an official investigation into the Royal Spanish Football Federation (RFEF).

The investigation follows racist chants during last week’s friendly match between Spain and Egypt in Barcelona, ​​as part of their preparations for the 2026 World Cup.

The incident sparked widespread controversy and condemnation in both the sporting and political spheres, at a time when international pressure is mounting to combat racism in football stadiums.

Disciplinary proceedings and official investigation

According to a report in the Athletic, FIFA confirmed it has opened disciplinary proceedings against the RFEF following the events that occurred during the friendly against Egypt, which took place during the international break.

Advertisement

The referee documented the racist chants in his official report, leading to the case being referred to FIFA’s Disciplinary Committee for review and appropriate action.

Offensive chants spark crisis

Racist chants, most notably ‘Anyone who doesn’t jump is a Muslim’, were heard in the stands of Barcelona’s RCDE Stadium, sparking widespread outrage and being considered a blatant violation of FIFA’s anti-discrimination regulations.

Potential sanctions without stadium closures

According to reports, the potential sanctions against the Spanish Football Federation could range from a fine to requiring them to display anti-racism awareness messages during upcoming matches.

However, the same source indicates that the sanctions are not expected to extend to closing stadiums to fans, despite the seriousness of the incident.

Advertisement

A sensitive test before the 2030 World Cup

These developments come at a sensitive time for Spain, which is preparing to co-host the 2030 World Cup with Morocco and Portugal, potentially placing it under international scrutiny regarding its anti-racism record.

FIFA continues to tighten its measures against racist behavior, having previously clearly supported Real Madrid star Vinicius Junior in his repeated stances against racist abuse in European stadiums.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Arsenal beat Sporting Lisbon 1-0 in first of CL tie

Published

on

Arsenal beat Sporting Lisbon 1-0 in first of CL tie

Kai Havertz scored in the 90th minute to give Arsenal a 1–0 win away to Sporting CP in the first leg of their Champions League quarterfinal in Lisbon. The result hands Arsenal a slender but valuable advantage heading to the second leg at the Emirates.

Early shock

In the sixth minute, Sporting displayed a leading stance when Maxi Araújo’s rising shot met a diagonal from Ousmane Diomande. David Raya pushed the ball onto the crossbar with a fingertip save. This early intervention proved empirical in keeping the score level (UEFA match analysis). After the game, Raya said:

Those saves give you confidence. We believe 100% that we can win it…If you don’t believe then you’re never going to win it.

Midfield chess — Arteta’s plan and its limits

Mikel Arteta started Martin Zubimendi alongside Declan Rice and Martin Ødegaard to win space in midfield. Zubimendi’s positioning allowed Rice to press forward and gave Ødegaard room to probe between Sporting’s lines. Yet Arsenal struggled to find a clean final pass. Gabriel Martinelli threatened down the left but had cutbacks blocked. Noni Madueke found Matheus Reis a tough matchup.

Sporting invited Arsenal to play and relied on counters. Viktor Gyökeres worked hard to bring teammates into the game, while Sporting’s best moments came from long range, a sign of Arsenal’s defensive discipline.

Advertisement

Momentum swings

Arsenal believed they had taken the lead in the 58th minute when Zubimendi finished a neat move. VAR intervened and ruled Viktor Gyökeres offside in the buildup, wiping the goal out. The emotional swing was sharp: Arsenal had to reset after the disallowed goal, and Sporting found fresh belief.

The match opened up after that. Trincão curled a shot wide and Geny Catamo forced another save from Raya. Arsenal pushed but could not break Sporting’s compact defence.

In the 76th minute Arteta brought on 16yearold Max Dowman for Zubimendi. Dowman became the youngest English player to appear in a Champions League knockout match. Arteta said of Dowman:

He’s ready. He’s shown it every day. Moments like this are part of his growth.

Havertz’s late moment of quality

As the match looked destined for a draw, Martinelli delivered the decisive pass in the 90th minute. He threaded a weighted ball between Diomande and Eduardo Quaresma; Havertz ghosted into the gap, took one touch and slotted the finish past Rui Silva. It was a composed, well-timed strike that broke the deadlock. After the goal, Havertz said:

Advertisement

It’s something very special that is happening at Arsenal. We believe until the last second.

What it means for the tie

Sporting leave Lisbon with pride intact. They matched Arsenal for long periods, created chances, and conceded only to a late lapse. Their compact, aggressive defensive shape gives them a platform for the return leg.

On the other hand, Arsenal controlled key phases, rode the VAR setback, and produced a decisive moment at the end. The tie is far from finished, but Arsenal will head to the Emirates in a stronger position.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Cyprus is being used as a British military base

Published

on

Cyprus is being used as a British military base

Anti-war activist group Genocide-Free Cyprus have warned that despite pressure the UK wants to keep its colonial presence on the island intact. The group are vocal opponents of the use of Cypriot bases for Israeli genocide and the US/Israeli war on Iran.

They said in a post on 7 March:

They previously warned on 3 April:

The UK government is actively ramping up personnel and military equipment at RAF Akrotiri as the US and ‘I$rael’ intensify their attacks on civilian infrastructure in Iran.

Increasing numbers of foreign military aircraft are now passing through the bases, with no transparency or public disclosure about their purpose.

Adding:

Advertisement

These bases in Cyprus are being exploited to enable and sustain military operations that are deepening suffering and devastation across the region.

Cyprus is a war base for Britain

Cyprus is a hub for British military flights over Gaza. The flights are suspected to be gathering intelligence for Israel.

A suspected Hezbollah drone of Iranian manufacture hit Cyprus on 2 March 2026. Locals have raised their concerns about British colonial bases:

The British military has openly stated it considers Cyprus to be an aircraft carrier to project military force, As the Canary reported on 17 March, the head of the military Sir Richard Knighton said:

Advertisement

We don’t need the carrier. We don’t need the Navy. We have an aircraft carrier – it’s called Cyprus.

Knighton was answering criticism that the UK was unprepared for war. But his attitude betrays the same old colonial arrogance.

Snowden leaks show the truth

And as reporter Matt Kennard said on 17 March the US also used the island as a colonial spy base:

The Snowden leak Kennard is referring to states:

Cyprus hosts a wide range of UK and US intelligence facilities.

Government spokesperson Konstantinos Letymbiotis said on 3 March:

Advertisement

Despite the assurances given in yesterday’s address by the prime minister of the United Kingdom, there was no clear clarification that the British bases in Cyprus would not under any circumstances be used for any reason other than humanitarian.

Adding:

The information we had, through many communications and at various levels, was clear, that the British bases would have a strictly humanitarian role.

Genocide-Free Cyprus clearly feel their country has been colonised. They’re well within their rights to say so. UK and US control of sovereign Cypriot territory should end. And the sooner the better.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer comes out of hiding to comment on Iran

Published

on

Starmer comes out of hiding to comment on Iran

Iran and the US have agreed to a two week ceasefire. Mostly, it appears, on Iran’s terms. Israel has said Lebanon is not included in the ceasefire deal. UK PM Keir Starmer effectively vanished from sight ahead of the deadline for US president Donald Trump’s genocidal threat to wipe out Iran at 8pm EDT on 7 March 2026.

Starmer nowhere to be seen

Starmer re-emerged at 7.10am on 8 March once the ceasefire was announced. His comments were typically milquetoast:

His only tweet on 7 March – commencement day of a potential genocide and nuclear war  – was in reference to far-right rapper Kanye West’s cancelled appearance at the Wireless festival:

Starmer’s absence at that critical moment in world affairs was so obvious that even right-wing TV fool Mike ‘Concrete Grows‘ Graham belittled the PM:

UK foreign secretary Yvette Cooper also released a statement:

It is vital that the proposed talks lead to a full end to the conflict and ensure that Iran does not continue to threaten the Strait or its neighbours. I also call for an urgent end to hostilities in Lebanon.

We will continue to work internationally to support this ceasefire, to promote progress on negotiations, and to restore and protect security and stability for the region, and freedom of navigation for the world.

Advertisement

And the BBC reported that Starmer would visit the region in light of the ceasefire. A move bound to lift the spirits of the embattled people of the Middle East…

Trump is still trying to claim a win

Trump, who started the war without provocation, said this was a day for world peace and the start of a “golden age” for the region:

US-Israel attacked Iran first on 28 February without provocation. Iran was offering unprecedented concessions in negotiations at the time. The Pentagon has since stated there was no imminent threat from Iran. And the UN’s atomic watchdog, the IAEA, has said there is no evidence Iran was developing a nuclear weapon.

The US has achieved none of its original war aims. Iran predictably closed the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil channel, once attacked – creating a global energy crisis. Far from being defeated, Iran has said the war will continue until “the enemy’s inevitable and permanent humiliation, disgrace, regret, and surrender”. Trump came to power on an anti-war ‘America First’ ticket. He now faces worldwide humiliation.

There is some confusion over the details and origin of the ten-point ceasefire deal. But there is a strong sense that Trump accepted Iran’s terms while trying to rehash them as his own for the benefit of less media savvy audiences:

You can read over the initial terms of the deal here:

Pakistan and China

Pakistan helped broker the deal. A last minute push from China appears to have gotten it over the line:

Associated Press (AP) reported on 8 March:

Advertisement

China, which is Tehran’s biggest trade partner, spoke with the Iranians to get them on board, according to two officials who were not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Chinese officials were in touch with Iranian officials to encourage Tehran to find a path to a ceasefire deal as the negotiations were evolving, the officials said.

Adding:

Beijing primarily had been working with intermediaries, including Pakistan, Turkey and Egypt, as it tried to use its influence, said one of the officials, who was not authorized to comment publicly on the diplomatic matter.

China’s foreign affairs spokesperson Mao Ning told AP:

All parties need to demonstrate sincerity and quickly end this war that should not have happened in the first place.

She said China was deeply worried:

Advertisement

about the impact the conflict has on the world economy and energy security.

Timing of ceasefire taking effect still unclear

Israel continues to attack Lebanon. In fact, strikes appeared to intensify:

Many strikes were focused on the capital Beirut:

And Clash Report claimed strikes were still underway inside Iran:

Open source accounts also said Lavan island, home to an oil refinery, had been hit. Neither the US or Israel commented:

Advertisement

As AP reported:

Neither Iran nor the United States has offered any time for the ceasefire to begin

But a U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military operations, said American forces had halted offensive operations.

And:

Advertisement

Iran continued to fire at Gulf Arab states and Israel, despite Pakistan saying the ceasefire had taken hold immediately.

Much remains unclear. No timeframe has been set of cessation of hostilities. Iran and the US are both claiming some form of victory. And Israel is still battering Lebanon despite cessation of Israeli attacks being a key point in the ceasefire plan. In the coming days the framework of the ceasefire may become clearer. But it is important to keep in mind that this is only a pause, not a long-term peace deal.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025