Though it seems to have divided critics, Toy Story 5 has proven an undeniable box office success. It’s achieved the franchise’s biggest ever opening weekend, raking in over £227 million in the two-day stretch.

We loved the new installment – entertainment editor Daniel Welsh described it as “a return to form for the beloved animated series [and] for Pixar in general, after a hit-and-miss run for the once-untouchable studio”.

And as ScreenRant pointed out, the movie should satisfy long-standing viewers on another front too: it addressed a decades-long plot hole.

Buzz Lightyear doesn’t know he’s a toy for much of the first 1995 Toy Story movie. He truly believes he’s a Space Ranger and tries to contact his Space Command.

But that leaves a problem fans have previously pointed out on sites like Reddit: if Buzz doesn’t think he’s a toy, why does he freeze when Andy (the human owner of the toys) enters a room he’s also in?

All the other toys stop moving and talking whenever a person can see them, presumably so they can keep up their secret activity unnoticed.

But, some fans have argued, if Buzz saw himself as another human, it didn’t make sense for him to maintain the illusion of inanimacy.

Toy Story 5 seems to have given us an answer.

The new movie begins with a batch of Buzz Lightyear toys, all of which (though they’d probably prefer “of whom”) think they’re real Rangers.

Like Andy’s Buzz Lightyear, they try to contact their Space Command and can’t get through. Instead, they end up in a shipping crate in a shipyard.

When a worker gets close to them, all of the toys freeze.

And once they come back to life, one of them asks: “Why did we freeeze?”

Nobody has an answer, though one Buzz muses: “fascinating”.

It doesn’t fully explain the plot hole. But it does address it, and it shows that freezing isn’t a conscious choice for the toys – meaning Buzz probably froxe because he didn’t have any other option.

Content note: the following contains sexually violent details.

The host of The Tonight Show brought McGregor on as a guest to discuss his return to UFC.

This comes two years after the fighter was found liable by 12 jurors in a civil case after Nikita Hand accused him of raping her in a Dublin hotel back in 2018.

He was ordered to pay £206,000 in damages, though McGregor denies that he raped Hand, saying they had “fully consensual sex”.

Before the civil case, Ireland’s Director of Public Prosecutions made the decision not to bring criminal charges to McGregor due to insufficient evidence. Two later appeals were dismissed.

Now, fans have noticed that no clips of the McGregor interview have appeared on Fallon’s Instagram page, even though it took place days ago.

A comment under the talk show host’s Instagram clip, which showed his interview with Beatles star Sir Paul McCartney, reads: “Don’t want to post McGregor @jimmyfallon? Why not?”

It has racked up over 13,000 likes as of the time of writing.

In fact, the entire comment section under the McCartney video is filled with references to the McGregor appearance.

“Rehabilitating McGregor. I hope you’re proud of yourself,” a comment reads.

“Jimmy Fallon supports [grape emoji]ists [calling someone a “grapist” is a way of alluding to rapists online] and then hides behind other guests when called out,” another said.

Still more simply wrote Nikita Hand’s name over and over.

Similar responses have been shared under his more recent Trump, “password” game, and Milly Alcock videos on social media.

“I’m struggling to find the clips of the predator on @jimmyfallon Was it deleted? It should be acknowledged and there should be an apology!” an Instagram user opined under his most recent Instagram upload.

Others say they used to be fans but have changed their mind since the McGregor interview.

“We loved you. We thought you were one of the good ones,” a former fan said.

Comments also included the mention of tampons – “Tampon. Surgically. Removed,” one reads.

During the 2024 trial, gynaecologist and forensic examiner, Dr Daniel Kane, said he had had to remove Hand’s “wedged” tampon with forceps.

HuffPost UK has reached out to The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon for comment.

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

Every now and again, I have to try things I don’t want to as a shopping writer. I might not want to, but I do it anyway in the name of good journalism; so you don’t have to.

This particular occasion wasn’t one of them. Without giving you TMI, there is a certain time of month where my craving for anything with even a sprinkling of sugar becomes almost unbearable.

Praise the lord, that coincided with M&S releasing its new sweet dips this month, and I made it my business to try them.

You’ll remember its viral strawberries and cream sando from last year; this year it’s made a comeback in the form of a pistachio, chocolate, and strawberries and cream sandwich.

Personally, that sounds like a bit much. But even better than that, I think, is the fact the brand has now released two new dips to make all your picky bits dreams come true.

And yep, they’re also as sweet and delicious as a girl could dream for.

One of said life-fulfilling moments is a strawberry and cream fruity dip, while the other is a velvety chocolate and pistachio number.

You might be wondering what on earth you’re supposed to dip into them. Well, worry not, dear friend, because M&S has that covered on the literal packaging, too: shortbread, or strawberries.

And dear lord, are both of them delicious. Overall, the strawberry dip is more likely to be a crowd pleaser, because it tastes exactly like light and zingy strawberry jam loaded on top of a cream scone. Mmmmm.

It was also equally as good with the shortbread as it was the strawberries, which was surprising considering that’s basically strawberry squared.

Meanwhile, the texture of the chocolate dip was wholly delightful, however it didn’t taste much of pistachio.

I’m not complaining (because what’s not to love about pure chocolate?!) and it wouldn’t put me off trying it again, but I imagine people who are expecting a full on Dubai chocolate experience might be a tad disappointed.

All in all, though, I’d rate the strawberry one a solid 4.5/5, and the chocolate one a 4/5, and I know I’ll be picking these up on the way to picnics all summer long.