Connect with us

Politics

The House Opinion Article | Who’s Behind The Wheel Of Self-Driving Taxis?

Published

on

Who's Behind The Wheel Of Self-Driving Taxis?
Who's Behind The Wheel Of Self-Driving Taxis?


7 min read

A security check on a fleet of new electric buses in Oslo late last year uncovered features that caused international alarm.

Advertisement

The 300 Yutong buses were sending data back to its manufacturers in China. The company insisted this flow was necessary to “optimise” their performance.

But Norway’s transport authorities moved to prevent access to data being sent to China. They also said they had mitigated any possibility of a ‘kill switch’ that could be activated by the manufacturer crippling the fleet from afar.

The incident brought into sharp relief the challenges the Chinese-dominated market in electric vehicles are posing western policymakers – made all the more acute with the advent of self-driving cars.

China dominates the global EV market, with its home-grown company BYD overtaking Tesla as the world’s largest electric carmaker last year. Amid reports that Chinese self-driving taxis could be trialled in the UK as soon as this year, MPs and peers from across the political spectrum are urging caution.

Advertisement

The BBC reported in December that Uber and Lyft had unveiled partnerships with Chinese tech giant Baidu to pilot these taxis in London, which Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander called a “vote of confidence in our plans for self-driving vehicles”.

But Alex Sobel, Labour MP for Leeds Central and Headingley, tells The House he is worried these partnerships – and others with Chinese firms – could open the door to major data vulnerabilities. Under Chinese law, companies operating within its national borders are required to hand over any data requested by the authorities in Beijing.

“I am concerned that people’s personal information potentially can be shared with the Chinese state and used for a variety of purposes, if you are particularly concerned for certain communities – for instance, from Hong Kong, from Tibet, Uyghurs, or Chinese who have a dissenting view from the Chinese government,” Sobel says.

Advertisement

Chinese activists defying their government don’t only face persecution at home. Beijing conducts an extensive campaign of transnational repression against dissidents and critics – such as posting bounties against high-profile Hong Kong democracy campaigners who fled to safety in the West.

“Transnational repression is becoming increasingly sophisticated,” Sobel says. “And I’m not just saying that about China or other countries as well, but other countries don’t have as much reach and penetration to the UK as China.”

Sobel adds that while he believes there should be a kill switch in any AI-powered devices as a failsafe mechanism, such switches should be in control of the country’s government in which the technology is operating.

“If the Chinese state decided, for whatever reason, they want to act in a hostile way towards the UK and kill all of these off at a point in time when there’s a deep penetration in the UK, obviously that would have a massive effect.”

Advertisement

North Durham Labour MP Luke Akehurst is another with concerns. He posed a written question to the Transport Secretary in January, asking her to assess the risk “that electric buses operating in the UK could be remotely rendered inoperable via their internet-connected systems by hostile state actors”.

Dr Alessandro Arduino, an affiliate lecturer at King’s College London, tells The House that robo-taxis and other self-driving vehicles offer a “revealing case study” in how new technology can sit on a fine line between fresh innovation and national security dangers.

He notes that these cars generate reams of data as they drive – from location information to citizen movement and urban layout. “Such data is invaluable not only for training artificial intelligence systems but also for forecasting and strategic analysis,” he says. “China’s own policy framework is explicit in treating data and AI as matters of state sovereignty and national security, and I do believe that context matters.”

Such a dramatic threat as a kill switch would not be the first order concern, he adds, saying that the most urgent consideration is whether operating companies can keep their data secure from malicious actors.

Advertisement

A Transport for London (TfL) spokesperson says: “Safety is our top priority, and we are interested in learning more about technologies that could potentially help deliver safety benefits for all road users.

“TfL recognises the challenge of legislating in response to changes in automated vehicle technology in a timely manner to ensure benefits are delivered and risks are mitigated.”

It is not the first time the use of Chinese tech in Britain’s infrastructure has faced fierce opposition over national security fears. In 2020, the government halted the use of Huawei equipment in Britain’s 5G network and ordered that existing tech be removed by the end of 2027.

But it comes at a time when Downing Street is seeking a reset in relations with China after a frosty few years. In January, the controversial Chinese new ‘mega-embassy’ in London was granted planning permission – despite repeated concerns over its proximity to crucial fibre-optic cables and potential for heightened espionage.

Keir Starmer has also now become the first British prime minister to visit Beijing in eight years, travelling along with a cohort of business leaders in a drive to reap the vaunted benefits of dealing with the world’s second-largest economy.

Advertisement

The Prime Minister’s visit saw the announcement of plans to allow British citizens visa-free travel to China and the lifting of sanctions on MPs who had blasted Beijing’s repression of Uyghur Muslims.

Former Conservative leader Iain Duncan Smith MP, a persistent China ‘hawk’, says he would like to see a pilot of self-driving taxis in the UK blocked if it uses Chinese technology. “They all basically data-harvest those who use them. It goes all the way down the line.”

Chinese companies such as Baidu have also long been criticised for their role in online censorship in the country, where the government maintains fiercely tight control over the information space.

Sam Goodman of China Strategic Risks Institute tells The House: “Given the integral role Baidu plays in internet censorship in China, and its legal requirement to share users’ data with China’s Ministry of State Security, it is hard to see how it can be trusted with the data security and personal safety of the British public.”

As AI technology, including that used in self-driving vehicles, continues to advance at breakneck pace, governments across the world have been left scrambling to find a policy answer on how best to regulate the sector and mitigate its risks without suffocating innovation.

Advertisement

Professor James Davenport of the University of Bath tells The House that lawmakers face grappling with both the novelty and broad range of AI technologies as they figure out effective regulation. “For example,” he explains, “the EU AI Act will impose the same requirements on self-driving taxis as on chatbots offering psychiatric advice. The alternative would be an enormous mass of detailed legislation and incredible turf wars.”

Liberal Democrat MP Wera Hobhouse, who was refused entry to Hong Kong last year, says the proposed pilot “fits a worrying pattern of the government growing far too cosy with Beijing”. Hobhouse is among the voices who believe the pilot should not go ahead until the government can categorically prove there would be no risk posed to national security or public safety.

She tells The House: “From approving a Chinese super-embassy in London to pushing ahead with closer economic ties despite repeated security warnings, the government are sending the wrong signal: that trade is being prioritised over security, human rights and the safety of those who have fled repression to build new lives in the UK.”

A government spokesperson tells The House: “Safety is central to our plans for automated-vehicle pilots. All proposed deployments will be subjected to rigorous safety and cyber-security assessments.”

Advertisement

Baidu did not respond to a request for comment. It has previously denied allegations of links to the Chinese state and military. An Uber spokesperson said: “No matter which country an AV partner is from, we only work with them if they can both meet Uber’s own high standards and fully comply with all applicable laws on safety, security, and privacy.” Lyft did not reply to requests for comment. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

The importance of medical signs for women’s health

Published

on

The importance of medical signs for women's health

Medical signs are signals sent by the body when something is wrong. Unlike symptoms, which we can feel ourselves, signs are usually seen or measured by a doctor. Together, they help us understand what is happening in the body and, if necessary, start treatment in time.

Medical signs are external and internal manifestations of changes in health status.

The female reproductive system consists of internal and external organs. The external organs are collectively called the vulva, and the internal organs are the vagina, uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries. Signs of organ dysfunction can manifest both externally and internally. External signs include redness of the skin, swelling, or fever. Internal signs are changes in organ function that cause significant discomfort, such as bleeding. By paying attention to these signals, you can get tested in time and prevent serious problems from developing.Medical signs are reflected in some of our most famous symbols and signs.

Signs related to the female reproductive system

It is especially important for women to monitor the condition of their reproductive system. Any changes, even minor ones, may be a sign that the body needs help or additional examination. These signals help to notice in time that something unusual is happening in the body and requires attention.

These signs include:

Advertisement
  1. Menstrual cycle disorders: too frequent or, conversely, infrequent menstruation. Sudden changes in the cycle and pain during menstruation indicate a problem.
  2. Unusual discharge. If vaginal discharge has a strange smell, colour or consistency, for example, if it has become too thick or watery, this may be a sign of infection or other disorders.
  3. Pain in the lower abdomen. Constant or acute pain in the lower abdomen may signal problems with the ovaries, uterus or other reproductive organs. Sometimes the pain is related to menstruation, but if it recurs frequently or intensifies, it is advisable to see a doctor and get tested.
  4. Difficulties with conception. If a woman is unable to conceive for a long time despite regular sexual intercourse without contraception, this may be a sign of reproductive system disorders. In such cases, it is also important to consult a specialist to understand the causes and, if necessary, begin treatment.
  5. Changes in the breasts. Pain, lumps or changes in the shape of the mammary glands can be associated with both the menstrual cycle and more serious diseases such as mastitis or cancer.

The above signs should not be ignored, as they are signals that something is wrong in the body. Regular check-ups with a gynaecologist and self-monitoring of your condition will help you notice changes in time and stay healthy.

Any type of pain (sharp, dull, aching) in the lower abdomen and lower back is a reason to see a doctor. Medical attention is required for uterine bleeding not related to menstruation, bloody discharge in the middle of the cycle, pain or discomfort during intercourse.

If your menstrual cycle has become too long or too short, the amount or consistency of your discharge has changed, or you have itching and burning in the genital area, make an appointment with your doctor. The sooner you get tested and diagnosed, the better your chances of preventing the development of serious diseases.

Medical signs in cancer prevention

Medical signs allow cancer to be diagnosed in women at the earliest stages, when treatment is most effective. Preventive visits to a gynaecologist, mammologist and other specialists allow for the timely detection of breast lumps and atypical changes in the cervix, as well as determining the nature of unusual discharge or bleeding, which can lead to more serious consequences.

Early detection of these signs often saves lives, because in the early stages, many types of cancer have virtually no symptoms. It is important not to ignore the slightest changes and to undergo regular examinations, even if everything seems to be fine.

Advertisement

Important! Ideally, every woman should have an annual check-up with a gynaecologist, or even better, visit this specialist every six months. Following this recommendation helps to diagnose and treat vaginal infections, inflammatory diseases and endometriosis in a timely manner.

Mental well-being and response to stress

Stress and psychological state also affect a woman’s health, including her risk of developing cancer. Chronic stress can disrupt hormonal balance, weaken the immune system and affect the reproductive system.

Medical signs are a kind of ‘signal’ from the body. Sometimes they manifest directly, and sometimes indirectly: for example, through menstrual cycle disorders, constant fatigue, frequent infections, or skin and hair problems. Pay attention to the signals your body sends you. Learn to take care of your mental health, notice problems in a timely manner, and reduce health risks.

Carefully monitor the condition of your reproductive system, which often signals possible disorders in the early stages, including serious diseases. Regular visits to the doctor for preventive examinations, attentive care for yourself, and timely response to any unusual changes significantly increase your chances of staying healthy. Don’t forget about your mental health: stress, fatigue and emotional tension have a negative effect on the body and can manifest themselves in different ways. Simply paying attention to yourself and taking a comprehensive approach to your health will help you live a full life and feel good.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The Comfiest Baby Carrier Celeb Parents Love

Published

on

The Comfiest Baby Carrier Celeb Parents Love

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI – prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

It’ll ensure movement is as simple as possible, too; it offers three ergonomic carrying positions, with adjusting sliders for the perfect mixture of flexibility and support.

Aside from being supremely comfortable and easy to use, the Easy Vol. 2 is also great-looking (who said you need to sacrifice style at the altar of practicality?).

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Tulip Siddiq faces possible Interpol intervention

Published

on

Tulip Siddiq faces possible Interpol intervention

In yet another Labour scandal, MP Tulip Siddiq is facing an Interpol red notice request from Bangladesh. A court has ordered authorities to seek her arrest on corruption charges related to a real estate project.

This follows three previous convictions in absentia sentencing her to six years in prison for separate corruption cases involving her aunt, former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.

The Guardian reported that:

Bangladesh’s anti-corruption commission has alleged Siddiq used her relationship with her aunt, the former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, to influence the allocation of a plot of state-owned land in Dhaka’s Gulshan district to a private company. Siddiq has rejected the claim as baseless and politically motivated.

Tulip Siddiq: web of deceit

Of course, Tulip Siddiq is another one of the many considered to be in Peter Mandelson’s circle. Siddiq received a donation of £35,835 from Global Counsel in November 2023. 

Advertisement

Mandelson co-owned Global Counsel, a lobbying company that helped corporations “see opportunities in politics, regulation and public policy.” It built “a lucrative business from his political contacts built up while a minister under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.”

Global Counsel went into administration following the latest Epstein revelations as host of household names — including Tesco, Bank of America, and Barclays fled the “Britain’s most influential public affairs agencies.”

Sharmen Rahman, Green Party spokesperson for Equalities & Diversity, shared the news quipping “Mandelson approved Quality candidates update.”

Seems like Mandelson’s clique can’t catch a break.

Greens have previously also questioned how much Starmer has known about the crimes of colleagues associated with Mandelson:

Bubbling scandal

Siddiq resigned as Treasury minister in January 2025 after Bangladesh’s anti-corruption commission filed a case against her and her family, investigating corruption and embezzlement under her aunt Sheikh Hasina’s ousted regime.

Advertisement

She also referred herself to the independent adviser on ministerial standards, Laurie Magnus, who found she had not breached the ministerial code. As it happens, Magnus is also the man Keir Starmer is calling on to “fast-track” an investigation into Josh Simons, who accidentally leaked to a WhatsApp group that he’s already been told he’s in the clear. Whoops.

So yes, Laurie Magnus will likely be back once again to ahem clear another Labour figure of wrongdoing.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Man Arrested After Churchill Statue Defaced

Published

on

Man Arrested After Churchill Statue Defaced

The Met Police has just announced a 38-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated criminal damage after graffiti was sprayed on the statue of Winston Churchill in Parliament Square.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Reform Chairman schools Labour on losing Gorton and Denton

Published

on

Reform Chairman schools Labour on losing Gorton and Denton

Reform UK’s chairman, David Bull, stated on Newsnight last night, 26 February, that Labour would have won the Gorton and Denton by-election, if only they fielded Andy Burnham in the first place.

Now, that looks a little odd, doesn’t it? The second-place party is giving tips to the third-place party on how to beat them. The Canary has written a great deal about Labour being Reform-lite, but surely giving each other a leg-up is a bit much?

Only, if you were to consider it from Reform’s perspective, it makes complete sense. See, in order for the left vote to split, Labour would actually have to field someone, you know… on the left (yeah yeah, disclaimers to come).

Reform knows that; Reform needs that. It can’t survive the immigrant-bashing right vote being shared between itself, Labour, the Conservatives, and whatever the fuck Rupert Lowe is doing at the time. Or, to put it another way:

Advertisement

Starmer can’t even gift a seat to the far-right on a silver platter without fucking it up.

‘You would have won’

After a by-election that even frothing lefty indie outlets thought was going to be a close-run thing, the Greens ended up taking it by a wide margin.

On Newsnight the night of the by-election, Reform UK’s David Bull said:

Having spoken to lots of Labour voters, if you had fielded Andy Burnham, you would have won. Full stop. But Kier Starmer didn’t want him on the pitch. This is all about the preservation of Kier Starmer. It was a very bad mistake by the Labour Party.

Burnham, the popular Labour mayor of Greater Manchester, announced his intention to run in Gorton and Denton back in January. However, he was swiftly blocked by his party’s ruling body.

Advertisement

Burnham is frequently perceived as a viable left-wing alternative to Starmer for the head of the Labour Party. However, his road to the top would be much easier with a seat in the Commons, rather than the mayorship.

As such, Starmer couldn’t allow him the opportunity of a win. Even, that is, if it meant potentially handing the seat to Reform. Better the far-right than the near-left, ay?

Caveat time

I promised you caveats, and there are of course caveats. Burnham’s credentials as ‘actually left wing’ are severely questionable. Your Party’s Zarah Sultana recently pointed out that:

Andy Burnham played a key role in privatising our NHS while serving as Health Secretary.

Andy Burnham voted for the 2003 Iraq War — an illegal invasion that led to the deaths of over a million Iraqis.

Advertisement

Andy Burnham was a member of Labour Friends of Israel, an apartheid state that has committed genocide against the Palestinian people.

Gorton and Denton deserves a genuinely socialist MP — one who doesn’t vote for illegal wars, stands in solidarity with Palestine and is proudly anti-Zionist.

It’s a mark of how far Labour has fallen that Burnham now represents the leftward section of the increasingly right-wing party. But hey ho.

By contrast, Starmer’s Gorton and Denton pick was councillor Angeliki Stogia. Stogia supports NHS privatisation through ‘Private Finance Initiatives’, and has acted as a corporate lobbyist. Plus, she had Starmer’s backing — basically the right-of-center’s kiss of death.

Advertisement

Stogia won just 25.4% of the vote, in what was once a Labour safe-seat.

‘People are sick of them’

When Newsnight’s presenter Paddy O’Connell asked Zack Polanski if he agreed with Bull’s assessment, the Green leader replied:

No I don’t agree, actually. I think Andy Burnham is still a Labour Party politician, and I think people are sick of them.

Some polling has indeed suggested that Burnham would have won the seat, if he was permitted to run. We can never know precisely how that would have shaken out in real life, because Starmer would clearly rather cut off his own nose than allow the Labour right to lose its stranglehold on the party.

I wrote this piece somewhat tongue-in-cheek, talking about Starmer trying to gift the seat to Reform.

Advertisement

However, on a more serious note, the Green’s Hannah Spencer ran a fantastic campaign, taking an incredible 40.7% of the vote. She deserved the win on her own merit, Burnham or no Burnham. And now, Gorton and Denton has the left-wing MP it deserves.

Meanwhile, as their chairman demonstrated, Reform has been left rattled by Labour’s competition on the right. Personally speaking, they can fucking eat each other as far as I care.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Yerin Ha Opens Up About Filming Bridgerton Season 4 Bathtub Sex Scene

Published

on

Luke Thompson and Yerin Ha having a laugh at a Bridgerton season four launch event

Yerin Ha has explained why one of fans’ most-anticipated scenes in Bridgerton’s fourth season wasn’t nearly as sexy to film as it was to watch.

The moment in question sees Yerin’s character, Sophie, enjoying a steamy encounter with Benedict, played by Luke Thompson, in a bathtub.

However when it came to filming this sequence, it turns out that languishing in warm water for hours on end to achieve the perfect sex scene comes with occupational hazards.

“Basically I put baby powder all on me because I was told it would help dry my skin to put the intimacy wear on with the tape,” Yerin recently told Capital Breakfast.

Advertisement

“And then basically the next day after the bathtub, I got hives all over my body, and I got folliculitis, so I needed steroid cream.”

She joked: “But I blame myself, because I think it was a combination of baby powder and the bath water. So it’s me, I’m a sensitive gal!”

Benedict chipped in to reveal that the scene took seven whole hours to film. Let it never be said that actors don’t suffer for their art…

Luke Thompson and Yerin Ha having a laugh at a Bridgerton season four launch event
Luke Thompson and Yerin Ha having a laugh at a Bridgerton season four launch event

The bathtub scene in question was included in the second batch of episodes for Bridgerton season four, which arrived on Netflix earlier this week to mixed reviews from the critics.

Part two follows the developing romance between second eldest Bridgerton son Benedict and maid Sophie, after a complicated road including a masquerade ball, a wicked stepmother, and an absolute misfire when Benedict asked Sophie to be his mistress during a pivotal cliffhanger.

Advertisement

While that’s it for season four, there are at least a couple more series of Bridgerton in the pipeline, as we wait to see which of the remaining siblings’ love story is next.

Showrunner Jess Brownell previously teased who will step up to the plate in seasons five and six of the Netflix Regency drama, leaving fans to guess between Eloise and Francesca, played by Claudia Jessie and Hannah Dodd, respectively.

Bridgerton season four is streaming on Netflix now.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Churchill statue painted red by Dutch activist group

Published

on

Churchill statue painted red by Dutch activist group

On the morning of 27 February, the statue of Winston Churchill at Parliament Square, London, was smeared with red paint:

Dutch group Free the Filton 24 NL claimed the action. It’s one of many international groups standing in solidarity with Palestine Action, especially with the 33 political prisoners. This is the first action this group has claimed on UK soil.

Advertisement

Hiding from accountability

In a public statement, Dutch activist Olax Outis, spoke on behalf of the group. He openly expressed his opinion of the British and Dutch governments, calling them:

a bunch of cowards hiding from accountability.

The antisemite Winston Churchill, responsible for implementing the Balfour Declaration that handed Palestine over to the Israeli occupier, gets his fair share of insults as well. Although Outis noted that if it existed, he would rather demolish a statue of current Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

This is Free the Filton 24 NL’s first action outside its own borders. But the group has stood in solidarity with the British resistance to genocide since its founding. The Dutch activists have joined the British people in their recent series of celebrations, but remind the still oppressed UK citizens:

We aren’t done yet. This isn’t over.

Like thousands of activists in dozens of countries across the world, Free the Filton 24 NL targeted the British Embassy in its country. It used daily noise protests, vandalism, blockades, and an envelope containing baby poo delivered to the mailbox. Largely ignored, which seems to be a very good representation by the embassy, the group demands the UK government to “Clean up your shit!”

Advertisement

Another target is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, because the human rights violations in the UK also affect the human rights of Dutch citizens. Fifteen Dutch citizens have been arrested a total of 40 times on suspicion of terrorism. Thirty-nine of these allegedly terrorist acts involved silently holding a sign that read:

I oppose genocide – I support Palestine Action

Churchill statue a listed sculpture

Outis is currently under arrest, and the Metropolitan police are investigating. Whether the statue of Winston Churchill can be restored is currently unclear. The statue is a so-called listed sculpture and is part of a group of statues of politicians, some of them not complicit in genocide.

Churchill is now considered by many Britons to be the most popular politician ever. But after world war two, the British people voted the wartime prime minister out of office as quickly as possible, making way for a progressive counter-narrative.

Free the Filton 24 NL calls him out for Zionist war crimes. And compares him to current war criminal Keir Starmer and human rights violator Yvette Cooper.

Advertisement

‘Actievoeren werkt!’ – ‘Action works!’

British activist groups and their international comrades have recently achieved several major victories. The ban on Palestine Action has been declared unlawful, the Filton 24 have all been acquited of aggravated burglary, and most of them have been released on bail.

The nearly 3,000 people arrested on terrorism charges since July have so overwhelmed the system that police seem to have given up the investigation entirely. Charges are met with mockery, suspects wear the terrorist label as a badge of honour.

The hunger strikes have been paused and the strikers appear to be largely recovering. All over the world, people are cheering for the victory of the British people over their deceitful rulers.

But in occupied Palestine, dozens of people are still being slaughtered by the Zionist occupier every day. Drones are still being manufactured in the UK, advertised at Dutch arms fairs as ‘field tested [on Palestinians]’.

Advertisement

The Netherlands and the UK are still investing tens of billions of euros and pounds in Israel. Outis stated:

We’re still dealing with two governments that have made it clear they would rather let their own citizens die than stop genocide. That is why we must continue to take action. We are not done yet.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Labour fall flat after ‘only we can beat Reform’ promise

Published

on

Labour fall flat after 'only we can beat Reform' promise

Labour had a clear message in the Gorton & Denton by-election, and that message was ‘only we can beat Reform‘. The problem, of course, is that they didn’t beat Reform.

Despite this, they’re still suggesting only they can can do what they just publicly did not:

Is it too much to ask that they offer voters something besides nonsensical slogans?

Advertisement

Just nationalise utilities and tax the rich, for god’s sake; it’s not rocket science!

The Failure Party

In case you missed the results, here they are – a staggering defeat for Labour:

As you can see, Labour didn’t even beat Reform to second place.

As Stats for Lefties added:

Advertisement

In the video at the top, Labour deputy leader Lucy Powell said:

I think what is really clear is that there is a big majority in this constituency that hasn’t voted for Reform, and on the day the Greens have managed to win that argument that they were best placed to do that.

But I’m not sure whether that would totally translate in a general election.

So Labour are transitioning from ‘only we can win in Gorton & Denton‘ to ‘only we can win in the general election‘. The more elections they lose, however, the harder it is to sell that message.

Advertisement

Oh, and it doesn’t help that Labour used so many dirty tricks in this by-election (including faking a tactical voting campaign):

Advertisement

Novara’s Aaron Bastani, meanwhile, suggested the following:

Historic loss

The Gorton and Denton constituency has only existed since 2024, but the areas covered by it have voted Labour for decades. In other words, Keir Starmer ended a streak which lasted for around half a century.

And it didn’t have to happen.

As we reported, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham wanted to run, and he’s incredibly popular. Starmer and his cronies blocked him, and now Labour have suffered a loss so great there will surely be a leadership challenge.

People pointed out that Starmer made a public show of banishing Labour progressives who wanted things like nationalisation and peace. Starmer referred to these people as “fleas”. Now, the fleas have come back to bite him in the Gorton & Dentons:

Advertisement

Despite his record-breaking unpopularity, Starmer actually travelled to Gorton & Denton to support his candidate. Describing this as a “kiss of death”, we wrote:

If it was a “smart move”, it will be Starmer’s first since he took office.

If it was a bad move, it will be far from his worst move over the past week.

As it turned out, it was a bad move.

Advertisement

Jokes

At this point, the idea that ‘only Labour can win‘ has literally become a joke:

The question is this: will Labour get some new material, or will they repeat the line until it’s not even funny anymore?

Advertisement

Featured image via Stats for Lefties

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Bridgerton’s Season 4 Post-Credits Scene Included A Very Sweet Easter Egg

Published

on

Zoom into Benedict's tie and you just might spot a reference to one of season four's most memorable scenes

This article contains major spoilers for the Bridgerton season four finale.

After debuting four brand new episodes of Bridgerton earlier this week, Netflix had a surprise in store for fans with an unexpected post-credits sequence.

Those patient viewers who watched the latest season finale all the way to the end were treated to one last scene depicting the wedding between Luke Thompson and Yerin Ha’s characters, Benedict and Sophie, after their love story dominated the period drama’s latest run.

In the sequence, Benedict and Sophie’s low-key wedding day saw them surrounded by their families, both biological and chosen.

Advertisement

“To watch the classes comingle like that, it felt so representative of the journey that these two have been on, and it really felt like the perfect mingling of fantasy and reality,” showrunner Jess Brownell told Tudum.

But eagle-eyed viewers may also have spotted a subtle detail in Benedict’s wedding outfit that nodded to his love story.

Zoom into Benedict's tie and you just might spot a reference to one of season four's most memorable scenes
Zoom into Benedict’s tie and you just might spot a reference to one of season four’s most memorable scenes

“I wear a little pin in my necktie, and it has a tiny kite painted on it,” Luke explained, referring to a scene earlier in the season that saw his and Yerin’s characters bonding.

He enthused: “It’s an amazing costume design, in terms of their story, because it feels like it really sums them up in a way.”

Benedict Bridgerton and Sophie Baek share a kiss on their wedding day
Benedict Bridgerton and Sophie Baek share a kiss on their wedding day

While Bridgerton is now over for another year, fans can at least breathe a sigh of relief that the show has been commissioned for at least two more seasons, with Jess previously claiming she wanted to adapt all eight instalments in Julia Quinn’s Bridgerton book series.

There’s still no confirmation over which Bridgerton sibling will be the focus of season five – expected to premiere in 2028 – but signs in the finale point to either Claudia Jessie’s Eloise or Hannah Dodd’s Francesca.

Advertisement

All four seasons of Bridgerton are now streaming on Netflix.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Gorton and Denton is now GREEN

Published

on

Gorton and Denton is now GREEN

It’s no secret that we here at the Canary believed the Green Party could win in Gorton & Denton:

While we thought they’d do well, however, we didn’t anticipate quite how well:

Advertisement

It’s like Labour and Reform weren’t even trying.

Advertisement

Victorious

The above results show the number of voters in comparison to the 2024 general; the following shows the percentile change. As you can see, this is an absolutely disastrous result for Labour in what should be a stronghold:

While ‘Gorton and Denton’ has only existed since 2024, it’s comprised of parts of constituencies which have voted Labour for decades, including Manchester Gorton, Manchester Withington, and Denton and Reddish.

Keir Starmer has ended a streak which lasted for around half a century.

Labour kept saying they were the only party which could beat Reform, but they didn’t even beat them to second place.

Labour have a new problem now too.

The seal has popped.

They can cry ‘only we can win‘ as much as they like, but people know that isn’t true now, and for many that was the last reason they had to vote Labour.

Excuses

The establishment said the Green Party couldn’t win, and look what happened.

Advertisement

We told you what’s possible, meanwhile, and we’ll continue to do so.

Congratulations to Hannah Spencer MP and to all those who believed that something better can come.

Oh, and be ready to hold your nerve moving forwards:

Featured image via Barold 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025