Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Three Months Into A War, Trump Can’t Solve The Iran Uranium Problem He Himself Created

Published

on

In this photo released by Tasnim News Agency, a Revolutionary Guard Navy (IRGC) speedboat approaches the cargo ship Epaminondas during what state media described as the seizure of one of two vessels accused of violations in the Strait of Hormuz on April 21.

WASHINGTON — Three months into his “four to five week” war, President Donald Trump appears no closer to solving his purported goal of forcing Iran to give up its highly enriched uranium, a problem he himself created when he withdrew from the nuclear agreement negotiated by predecessor Barack Obama.

“They want very much to make a deal,” Trump said again at a White House Cabinet meeting photo opportunity on Wednesday. “But their navy is gone, as I’ve said a thousand times, their navy is gone, their air force is gone, everything’s gone, and they’re negotiating on fumes. But we’ll see what happens. Maybe we have to go back and finish it.”

Wednesday’s remarks came just four days after Trump claimed an agreement had been “largely negotiated” and that “final aspects and details of the deal are currently being discussed, and will be announced shortly.” While Trump and Iranian leadership both are unreliable narrators, reporting indicated Iran would only agree to “talks” about handing over its uranium.

Trump has repeatedly declared that the goal of the now 88-day-old war, which he began without consulting Congress or America’s traditional allies, is to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and there’s little indication Iran plans on giving ground on its HEU stockpile. What he neglects to mention is that Iran created every ounce of that material only after Trump tore up Obama’s Iran agreement.

Advertisement
In this photo released by Tasnim News Agency, a Revolutionary Guard Navy (IRGC) speedboat approaches the cargo ship Epaminondas during what state media described as the seizure of one of two vessels accused of violations in the Strait of Hormuz on April 21.
In this photo released by Tasnim News Agency, a Revolutionary Guard Navy (IRGC) speedboat approaches the cargo ship Epaminondas during what state media described as the seizure of one of two vessels accused of violations in the Strait of Hormuz on April 21.

Ever since the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the agreement was known, was signed in 2015 after two years of negotiations, Trump has falsely claimed that it actually gave Iran the permission and means to build nuclear weapons. He repeated that lie Wednesday: “It was the path for Iran to have a nuclear weapon very quickly. Years ago, they would have had a nuclear weapon.”

In fact, Obama’s agreement strictly limited Iran’s ability to enrich uranium and introduced an intrusive system of outside inspectors to monitor.

Iran’s leaders, who were eager for sanctions relief provided in return, were honoring the enrichment prohibition, something Trump’s first-term administration freely admitted. Trump, nonetheless, scrapped the agreement in 2018.

“The State Department and intelligence community had repeatedly confirmed that Iran was complying with the terms of the JCPOA when Trump unilaterally withdrew from it,” said Ned Price, a former CIA officer and a State Department official under former President Joe Biden.

Trump has claimed ever since he pulled out of the JCPOA that Iran wanted to make a “deal” with him. As he ran for reelection in 2020, he said repeatedly that Iran wanted one badly but was waiting for the start of his second term.

Advertisement

Then, as he ran to regain the White House after his Jan. 6, 2021, coup attempt failed, he claimed that he would strike a deal with Iran quickly after returning to office.

Instead, Trump attacked Iran twice, first in June 2025, and then on Feb. 28 — both times as productive negotiations were supposedly underway.

Now, almost three months into a war that has damaged the global and US economies, has spiked oil and gas prices, has increased inflation, and has left 13 Americans and at least 1,500 Iranians dead, Trump continues to claim that Iran badly wants “a deal,” even as its leaders appear to stall and drag things out.

“There’s a tendency, especially when it comes to the Middle East, to be dismissive of American diplomacy and to assume that most problems require the use of military force. Many critics of the JCPOA were under the misimpression that the Iranian nuclear challenge would melt away once we struck its nuclear sites,” Price said. “Trump’s decision to test that proposition has proven that this was always pure folly and, ironically, underlined the enduring advantage of a diplomatic resolution.”

Advertisement

Robert Kagan, a top State Department official in Ronald Reagan’s administration and now a foreign policy analyst at the Brookings Institution, said Trump’s repeated false claims that a deal was close only serve to hide the truth of the war, noting Iran engaged US forces on Monday.

“The fact that the Iranians felt emboldened to target American ships shows they are not afraid of a resumption of war because they know Trump has no good military options and that he wants out,” he said. “The war was over in March. The US lost. Everything since then has been aimed at covering this up.”

He said the worst outcome of the war will be Iran’s newfound control over the Strait of Hormuz and one-fifth of the world’s oil traffic.

“Iran was deterred from closing the strait by fear it would invite this kind of attack which could pose a threat to the regime’s very existence,” he said. “Now they have proven they can survive an extended bombing campaign and still do unacceptable damage to the region, including control of the strait. Having driven Iran to prove this, we are now living in that world and there can be no return to the status quo ante.”

Advertisement

As for the enriched uranium, Iran can win on that point, as well, said John Bolton, one of Trump’s first-term national security advisers and a longtime advocate for attacking Iran to change its regime.

“Iran is playing for time. Trump is still desperate for a way to claim victory. Most importantly, there’s no real deal, just an extension of the cease fire and opening the strait,” he said. “Iran wins by kicking the nuclear issue down the road.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Fans React To Susan Boyle’s ‘New Era’ Glamorous Photo-Shoot Tease

Published

on

Fans React To Susan Boyle's 'New Era' Glamorous Photo-Shoot Tease

Susan Boyle has really captured people’s attention with an intriguing new social media post.

After wiping her entire Instagram feed, she shared some fabulous new pictures of herself in a full-length fur coat (not the ideal attire for a heatwave, let’s be honest), expensive-looking sunnies and a blunt blonde bob, walking down the street, sitting in the back of a car and, crucially, recording at London’s Metropolis Studios.

She also teased that a “new era starts tomorrow” (adding a cryptic “#ad” in the comments too).

The Grammy nominee’s glamorous new look and tease about her “new era” have already got people’s imaginations running wild, not to mention sparking plenty of chat over on social media.

Advertisement

As long-time Susan devotees, we’ll be keeping a close eye on this one…

Susan, of course, first shot to fame as a contestant on Britain’s Got Talent, with her original audition inadvertently sparking an international viral sensation.

Eventually, Susan finished in second place in the contest behind dance troupe, but still went on to sign with Simon Cowell’s record label, releasing seven studio albums (including four UK number ones), landing two Grammy nominations and setting a new record for first-week sales for a debut album.

“I’m so excited for the year ahead and everything that’s to come. I can’t wait to share it all with you,” she said last month after celebrating her 65th birthday.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Cynthia Erivo Recalls Scrutiny She And Ariana Grande Faced Promoting Wicked

Published

on

Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande promoting the second Wicked movie in London in 2025

Cynthia Erivo is reflecting on the infamous press tour she and her Wicked co-star Ariana Grande took part in to promote the hit film.

Back in 2024, Wicked’s two lead stars went into full-blown promo mode to help plug the movie musical, which led to a string of viral moments and, indeed, a number of tearful interviews.

Reflecting on the last four years, Cynthia told Variety as part of a new interview: “We were holding on by threads, and we were really trying to take care of each other.”

The British performer noted that she and Ariana made a “really conscious decision” early on in the process of making Wicked to have one another’s backs, but during the promotion of the film, the sincerity of their friendship was called into question once or twice.

Advertisement

“It’s very interesting, watching what people’s perception is versus what the reality actually is,” she recalled of the period she and Ariana were being dissected on social media.

“[There were] lots of psychologists seated at home deciding who we were, what we were going through, what we were doing and why.”

Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande promoting the second Wicked movie in London in 2025
Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande promoting the second Wicked movie in London in 2025

“I think that people didn’t really believe that we were actually friends, but that’s also because people don’t know me very well,” Cynthia added, noting that she and Ariana still text one another most days, even with Wicked behind them.

She added: “ I think sometimes, if I’m honest, people thought I was being myself, even though I was green.”

Towards the end of the interview, Cynthia was also asked if she’d ever consider going back to play Elphaba in a third Wicked movie, admitting that she probably didn’t have enough distance from the first two to really offer an answer.

Advertisement

She did, however, claim that it would “take a lot” for her to return to Oz, and that the project would have to “make sense”.

Back in 2024, Cynthia defended the emotional interviews she and Ariana had given while promoting Wicked.

Pointing out that, at that point, the films had taken up “almost three years of our lives”, she told BuzzFeed UK: “We’re still processing everything – and this tour has been a wonderful opportunity to talk about the experience of making it, and the experiences we had together, and the experience of coming out of it.”

“So, yeah, we’ve definitely been emotional, because we’re still deeply connected to it. And I think we’ll always be connected to these roles, these women that we got to play, who I don’t think have completely left, or will ever leave, because they were such a large part of our lives.”

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Streeting Slams Blair For Failing To Acknowledge Inequality

Published

on

Streeting Slams Blair For Failing To Acknowledge Inequality

Wes Streeting has joined Andy Burnham in accusing Tony Blair of not acknowledging the inequality in the UK.

The ex-prime minister tore into Labour in a 5,600 word essay this week, saying the current shadow leadership contest is futile until the party reassesses its policies.

His warning came as Greater Manchester mayor Burnham is contesting the Makerfield by-election in the hope he can get a seat in parliament, where he is expected to challenge Keir Starmer’s premiership.

Streeting, who quit as health secretary earlier this month, has made it clear he intends to join any leadership challenge.

Advertisement

But Blair urged the party to resist drifting further leftward, and called out both politicians. He wrote: “Wes Streeting is a huge political talent and Andy Burnham was an outstanding member of my government.

“But this leadership debate has an extraordinarily retro 20th-century feel to it. Like most politicians, they’re anxious to distance themselves from the ‘Westminster bubble’.”

Speaking after Labour’s thrashing in the May elections, Blair said Labour’s declining popularity stems from a lack of “worked-out, coherent plan”, and urged the party to govern from the “radical centre”.

Streeting, often described as a Blairite though he rejects the term, wrote in the Guardian that there was a “striking weakness at the heart of Tony Blair’s intervention”.

Advertisement

He said: “Across thousands of words about technology, geopolitics and political strategy, the defining issue of our age is barely confronted at all.

“Inequality – the economic, social and democratic fracture running through modern Britain – is treated as peripheral rather than fundamental.

“But inequality, rather than being incidental to the crises reshaping western democracies, is actually their cause.”

Streeting also pushed back on Blair’s call for the UK to retain close ties with the US, despite the conflict with the Trump administration.

Advertisement

“When US presidents flirt with authoritarian leaders, undermine international law or pursue reckless military adventurism, Britain must have the confidence to act independently.

“We learned at terrible cost in Iraq what happens when loyalty replaces judgement. Britain’s long-term future lies in Europe,” the Labour MP for Ilford North wrote.

He also rejected the suggestion that Labour’s answer comes in longing for the 70s or the 90s.

Meanwhile Burnham told the Observer on Wednesday: “The last 40 years has given us wide inequality – that’s what’s responsible for the abandonment of the centre.

Advertisement

“People don’t think the centre has delivered for them in terms of their lives, therefore they’ve gone further to the extremes.”

Burnham, known for being on the soft left of the party, tore into Blair’s vision of what the UK should look like.

“He doesn’t mention inequality once,” he said. “If you don’t get how that’s driving politics now, if you are not rooting your analysis in the fact that people are unable to live and that things that were taken for granted are no longer affordable, then you are not understanding what’s going on.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Fox News Anchor Highlights Trump’s Recent Threat

Published

on

Fox News Anchor Highlights Trump's Recent Threat

Fox News is … sounding the alarm?

Shortly after the conclusion of a Cabinet meeting Q&A at the White House on Tuesday, Fox News anchor John Roberts decided to zero in on one very disturbing thing President Donald Trump did: casually threaten to blow up Oman.

During the Q&A, Trump rejected a plan to have Oman and Iran jointly control the Strait of Hormuz.

“The Strait is going to be open to everybody. It’s international waters,” Trump said. “We’ll watch over it, but nobody’s going to control it. Oman will behave like everybody else or we’ll have to blow them up. They understand that. They’ll be fine.”

Advertisement

“In the middle of all that — and it really kind of went unnoticed by the reporters,” the visibly flummoxed anchor said. “President Trump became the first American president that I know of to ever threaten to take military action against Oman, saying that they have to behave like everyone else or we’re going to blow them up. I’m not quite sure what that was all about.”

“Let’s go to our senior White House correspondent, Peter Doocy, at the White House. Peter, what were your takeaways from this, other than that not-so-veiled threat against the country of Oman, with which the United States has had a traditionally peaceful relationship?”

Doocy went on to highlight other moments from the meeting, but Roberts seemed to still be reeling.

Advertisement

“Well, there’s no question there is something going on in this town. For sure,” Roberts said.

The State Department seemed to double down on Trump’s remarks about Oman — a Middle Eastern country the US has shared a friendly relationship with for two centuries — by publishing a clip of his remarks on X Tuesday (below). You know, just so the threat doesn’t slip through the cracks.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Brags If Iran Doesn’t Give Him What He Wants, Hegseth Will ‘Finish ‘Em Off’

Published

on

Trump Brags If Iran Doesn’t Give Him What He Wants, Hegseth Will ‘Finish ‘Em Off’

President Donald Trump bragged that if Iran doesn’t give the US what it wants amid negotiations for a potential agreement to end hostilities — then Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is going to “finish ’em off.”

Trump made the remark during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on Wednesday after a reporter asked him to describe where the talks with Iran are at in football terms, asking him, “What yard line would you be on?”

Opting to skip the football analogies, the president responded, “They are starting to give us the things that they have to give us, and if they do, that’s great. And if they won’t, then the man on my left is gonna finish ’em off.”

Trump was referring to Hegseth, who was seated on his left.

Advertisement

“Is there a time frame in your mind?” the reporter followed up.

Noting that it “happens quickly,” Trump said, “The problem is, every time I mention a time frame — for instance … we’ve been doing this for a few months. Vietnam lasted 19 years. Korea lasted eight years. Afghanistan lasted many years. They were all many, many years. And we’re into it for a few months.”

Trump then referenced the American troops who were killed during Operation Epic Fury in Iran and across the broader Middle East.

“We lost 13 souls, 13 great people. [I] met the parents, great people. It’s a terrible thing, but 13. If you look at the war casualties and the deaths and wars for Vietnam and all that, they lost hundreds of thousands of people in numerous of these wars.”

Advertisement

Trump added, “We’re very cognizant of that. We want to lose very few, we want very few to be injured. We’re very careful, but war is war. War is dangerous.”

Elsewhere in the meeting, the president said that he is “not satisfied” yet with the terms of the deal being negotiated with Iran. Claiming that Tehran is “very much intent” on reaching an agreement to end the conflict, he added, “So far, they haven’t gotten there.”

Listen to Trump’s remarks from the Cabinet meeting below (skip to the 1:08:57 mark.)

Advertisement

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

I’m a liberal, metropolitan Remainer. So why am I warming to Reform?

Published

on

I’m a liberal, metropolitan Remainer. So why am I warming to Reform?

In January 2025, I signed with Swift Press, a great independent publishing house, to write a book called The Rise of Reform. It would be an examination of Nigel Farage’s upstart party and how it might grow from where it was already into an organisation capable of governing Britain. I was excited to take it on. However, there were several immediate issues I faced after signing the agreement: for a start, I didn’t have a single contact within Reform UK.

The other dilemma was that I am a very liberal sort of person who lives in London and would ideally like it if the United Kingdom rejoined the European Union. In other words, I am not someone who you would have pegged as a possible Reform convert. Yet I was determined not only to get under the skin of the party, but also to report back on it in the most objective way possible. I vowed to simply write about whatever I found out there, beyond the M25, in the most honest way I could.

I got lucky and landed some interviews with high-ranking Reform people, right off the bat. Richard Tice agreed to speak to me; I thought I would get 20 minutes tops with him, and then he gave me an hour and a half of his time. It was a fantastic interview as well, with some great anecdotes sprinkled in.

Advertisement

Yet the real eye-opener in my research was speaking to the party’s footsoldiers, the Reform activists on the ground in places like Hartlepool, Lincoln and Runcorn. Those who were standing locally for the party, or if not, giving up their weekends to knock on doors or deliver Reform leaflets. And these people were nothing like what I expected. Nothing at all.

I will admit that my liberal, metropolitan assumptions made me feel certain that I would meet a lot of racists (closeted or otherwise), conspiracy-theory nuts and just general far-right yobs when seeking out the Reform Party in the wild. Yet I found none of those things while meeting and chatting with Reform activists in places like Bootle or Spalding. What I found, every time, were groups of very normal, down-to-earth, mostly working-class British people who felt let down by a system that frankly, it was easy to see why they felt let down by. I heard nothing racist or homophobic or fascistic in all my travels around the country, speaking with hundreds of Reform candidates and activists. In one sense, they were all disappointingly well-behaved and lovely.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

I even met some ethnic-minority Reform candidates, some of whom were immigrants. One who sticks out for me was Ahmed Ibrahim, a man who had come to Britain from Egypt 17 years ago. He was standing for Reform in Tower Hamlets. I asked Ahmed what attracted him to the party. He told me:

‘For me, in my mind at the time, there was no way to be with Nigel Farage. But then I said, okay, why don’t I listen to the guy? I was just rejecting him because of assumptions. Then, I listen, and Nigel makes sense… I attended a couple of branch meetings here in Tower Hamlets. And I didn’t see any racism at all. Like normal people, yes, some of them, they have a stronger view. But I’m telling you, I have stronger views than them, even on immigration!’

Advertisement

The best anecdotes from my travels in Reform-land came via the great British public, those people I encountered while watching Reform activists knocking on constituents’ doors. That experience gave me a whole new insight into the country on its own.

The folks who answered their doors to Reform activists broadly fell into one of three categories. The first were those who were either enthusiastically going to vote Reform or were at the very least heavily leaning towards Farage’s crew. Some of you reading this may be sad to note that I encountered a hell of a lot of people who fit into this group out there.

The second bunch were those who would rather drink sulphuric acid than even consider voting Reform.

Advertisement

The final category involved those I found most depressing – the people who said they weren’t voting at all. They had decided they weren’t going to take part in any elections, not in a resigned or embarrassed way – no, these people were not going to be voting for anyone as a statement of intent. They were proud to be non-voters. Their non-voting was a political statement, ironically enough.

‘They are all crap, all the parties, total crap’, a man told the Reform activists I was with on his doorstep one afternoon. I stepped in and asked him, ‘Okay, but if you had to pick one party that you thought was the most crap of them all, which one would it be?’. He looked intrigued by the question and took a moment to think before answering. ‘Wouldn’t choose between them, they are all the same.’

A lot of people said things so negative (and possibly libellous) about Keir Starmer, I couldn’t possibly reprint any of them here. ‘Starmer should be in prison for what he’s done to this country already!’, which I heard from a man in north Wales, was probably the most vanilla. There was also a lot of anger directed at the Labour Party more generally. ‘I was a proud trade-union member before I retired’, said one man in an impoverished part of north-west England to the Reform canvassers who had knocked on his door. ‘I have voted Labour all my life. But couldn’t do it again. They aren’t the same party now.’

Advertisement

Almost no one, in any of the places I visited, mentioned the Conservatives – at all. It was like they didn’t exist, even in places where they had been dominant for decades.

Of course, the people who hated Reform really, really hated Reform, often expressed with a viciousness that was shocking. The way that Reform activists dealt with these outbursts made me like them even more. ‘Thank you for time, have a good rest of the day’, they would say to someone who had just called them a fascist and told them to ‘fuck off and die’ for good measure. The way Reform activists behaved in these situations was always reassuringly British to me.

Whether you agree with Reform UK on policy or not (and I still have many reservations in this department myself), you shouldn’t confuse that with your feelings about the party’s activists. Calling them fascists and racists simply doesn’t work for liberals, as May’s election results clearly demonstrate. This assertion about them just isn’t true either, as I found out for myself.

Advertisement

Now that I have finished writing The Rise of Reform – due for release in September – it makes me feel a little sad that I have no more cause to spend time with groups of Reform activists, in a pub after a day of canvassing, somewhere in the north of England or the Midlands. I will miss them.

That’s why I am hoping Restore does not spoil things for Reform in the upcoming Makerfield by-election. Here is a chance for a true working-class movement to bring down the Labour Party, an organisation established to represent the working class in Britain that has clearly lost its way. A lot depends upon Reform winning this by-election. I wish them the best of luck.

Nick Tyrone is the author of The Rise of Reform, published by Swift in September 2026.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Chickenpox, Impetigo Or Hand, Foot And Mouth: How To Spot Difference

Published

on

Chickenpox, Impetigo Or Hand, Foot And Mouth: How To Spot Difference

This article features expert advice from Dr Bisola Laguda, a paediatric dermatologist and spokesperson for the Skin Health Alliance.

With kids now getting extra protection against chickenpox as part of their routine childhood immunisations, it’s hoped fewer kids will end up struggling with the worst effects of the illness.

That said, kids might still catch it – albeit a milder version – and those who aren’t vaccinated against it (either because they’re too young or their parents opted out) will also be at risk.

But spotting chickenpox can be tricky, especially as the telltale sign is a rash – and other childhood illnesses like impetigo and hand, foot and mouth can look pretty similar.

Advertisement

To try and get some clarity on how to tell it apart from other illnesses, which is important so you know how to treat it (and how long they’ll need off school or childcare), we spoke to Dr Bisola Laguda, a paediatric dermatologist and spokesperson for the Skin Health Alliance.

What are the signs of chickenpox parents need to know?

Chickenpox is a very contagious infection caused by the varicella zoster virus. Data indicates that half of children will contract chickenpox by the age of four, and 90% by the age of 10.

Kids might initially experience flu-like symptoms, such as a high temperature and feeling sick and/or achy, said Dr Laguda.

Advertisement

“When the rash does manifest, it’ll be in the form of small red spots that blister and can become very itchy,” she said.

“These spots can appear in clusters anywhere on the body, but are commonly found on the arms, legs, chest and stomach, as well as the face, scalp and ears.”

It’s worth bearing in mind that new spots can appear around three to five days after the initial rash begins, too.

After a day or two, the blisters begin to burst and dry out, “with the crusting skin naturally falling off within two weeks”.

Advertisement

The dermatologist noted that whilst chickenpox can cause a lot of frustration and upset, children’s symptoms will often resolve themselves naturally.

But if the skin around the blisters becomes hot, red or painful; the blisters themselves get infected; or your child develops other symptoms such as dehydration, chest pain, or difficulty breathing, she said it’s best to contact your GP.

Never give ibuprofen to kids with chickenpox (unless told to by a doctor). Pharmacists can provide antihistamine medicine to try and ease any itching, while paracetamol can help with pain or discomfort.

How does chickenpox differ to hand, foot and mouth disease?

Advertisement

Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is another unpleasant illness kids tend to pick up in the early years.

The first stage of symptoms typically involves a sore throat, high temperature and not wanting to eat. A few days later, kids develop a raised rash of spots and/or mouth ulcers.

There are some key distinctions that can help parents tell the two viral infections apart, said Dr Laguda.

“Both manifest in rashes, but appear on different areas of the body and have visual discrepancies,” she explained.

Advertisement

“Where chickenpox can appear anywhere, HFMD rash patterns are most commonly found on the palms of the hands, soles of the feet and inside the mouth – though it is true that we are seeing more cases of HFMD around the face and genitalia, so worth keeping an eye on these areas too.

“Also, chickenpox rashes appear as small, itchy blisters, whereas HFMD is usually characterised by flat, red spots.”

The illness usually gets better on its own. If symptoms don’t go after seven to 10 days, speak to your GP.

And how does it differ from impetigo?

Advertisement

Impetigo is another contagious illness you probably won’t have heard of until your kids get it (I certainly hadn’t).

The skin infection starts off as red sores or blisters, which can then burst leaving crusty, almost cornflake-like golden brown patches. These can be itchy and/or painful.

Dr Laguda said it’s “important to be able to distinguish chickenpox from impetigo”.

“While impetigo is a bacterial infection and chickenpox is viral, both can cause itchy, blistery rashes. However, where chickenpox rashes are fluid-filled blisters potentially found across the entire body, impetigo appears as yellow-ish, crusty patches around the nose, mouth and limbs.

Advertisement

“It’s worth noting impetigo can develop secondary to chickenpox if blisters become infected after being scratched.”

Treatment typically involves hydrogen peroxide cream or antibiotic cream/tablets, so a trip to the pharmacist or your GP is warranted.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

England World Cup training camp security revealed

Published

on

A general view of the preparations around Met Life Stadium as the signage is transitioned to become New York New Jersey Stadium ahead of the FIFA World Cup 2026 on May 26, 2026 in East Rutherford, New Jersey.

A general view of the preparations around Met Life Stadium as the signage is transitioned to become New York New Jersey Stadium ahead of the FIFA World Cup 2026 on May 26, 2026 in East Rutherford, New Jersey.

England’s World Cup training camp will be subject to unprecedented security measures in the US amid growing fears of drone spying operations or sabotage attempts aimed at players and fans.

The US authorities and the FA have decided to turn the squad’s camp in Kansas City into something resembling a fortified base, the Sun reported.

The daily newspaper revealed that specialised “hunter-catcher” aircraft, which are anti-drone aircraft capable of shooting down any unlicensed aircraft through special nets, in addition to electronic jamming devices and advanced monitoring systems, will be deployed.

England players protected by systems able to disable drones

It’s alleged that police will establish ‘no-fly zones’ over the England team’s headquarters at the Swap Soccer Village base. They will also provide security units with systems capable of disabling drone control signals or forcing them to land in specific locations, in anticipation of any attempts to breach the airspace during training or matches.

Advertisement

Security experts believe that drones have become one of the most prominent threats associated with major sporting events, given their low cost and the difficulty of detecting them compared to traditional threat methods.

The Sun quoted former FBI drone countermeasures expert, Tom Adams, as saying that the biggest challenge is not just detecting drones but quickly determining their intentions, whether for sabotage, political, or even sports espionage purposes.

Adams stressed that the security system adopted to protect the England team will be similar to the technologies used during the American Super Bowl.

British concern over potential espionage

This month, the Guardian revealed that German coach, Thomas Tuchel, had expressed concerns about the possibility of “football espionage”.

Advertisement

The newspaper also confirmed that the FA is working to enhance the privacy of England’s World Cup training camp to prevent rival teams, the media, or any external parties from monitoring training sessions or picking up tactical information that could give England’s opponents an advantage.

Warnings about security concerns during the 2026 World Cup highlighted the potential targeting of transportation networks, disrupting infrastructure, or using drones near fan zones and stadiums.

$14 million to enhance World Cup security systems

As part of the extensive preparations for the 2026 World Cup, US authorities have allocated huge security funding to Kansas City to develop anti-drone systems and secure the airspace during the tournament.

Missouri has received more than $14 million to enhance protection systems related to the World Cup.

Advertisement

These moves reflect the seriousness of the security threat surrounding the upcoming football tournament, which will be held for the first time in three countries: the US, Canada and Mexico.

Organisers expect record crowd attendance and the largest security monitoring in the tournament’s history.

Featured image via Rob Carr/ Getty Images

By Alaa Shamali

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump's Latest Troll Will Probably Offend Both Americans And Israelis

Published

on

President Donald Trump speaks about prescription drug prices in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House campus, Monday, May 18, 2026, in Washington
President Donald Trump speaks about prescription drug prices in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House campus, Monday, May 18, 2026, in WashingtonPresident Donald Trump speaks about prescription drug prices in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House campus, Monday, May 18, 2026, in Washington

Although Donald Trump has previously hinted about running for an unconstitutional third presidential term in the United States, he suggested on Wednesday that he had another job in mind: prime minister of Israel.

Trump made the trollish suggestion during a Wednesday press gaggle after a reporter asked him what he’d said toIsrael’s current prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahuabout holding off on strikes on Iran.

“He’s fine,” Trump said. “He’ll do whatever I want him to do. He’s a very good man. Uh, he’ll do whatever I want him to do. And he’s a great guy. To me, he’s a great guy. Don’t forget: He was a wartime prime minister, and he’s not treated right in Israel, in my opinion.”

Trump then inexplicably pivoted from praising Netanyahu to suggesting that Israelis might prefer him as their leader.

“I’m right now at 99% in Israel. I could run for prime minister, so maybe after I do this, I’ll go to Israel and run for prime minister,” Trump said. “I had a poll this morning — I’m [at] 99%, so that’s good.”

Advertisement

HuffPost attempted to find the poll that cited Trump’s whopping popularity in Israel, but was unsuccessful. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for the poll Trump cited.

A Jerusalem Post poll from February says 73% of Israelis consider Trump a better-than-average US president where Israel is concerned, and 49% call him one of the best in history for Israel.

Although Trump was likely not making a serious suggestion, he’s blustered about leading other foreign nations before.

Last month, he suggested that he might run for president in Venezuela after toppling the country’s leader, dubiously claiming he was “polling higher than anybody has ever polled” there.

Advertisement

Trump isn’t currently eligible to be Israel’s prime minister anyway: Israeli law requires a prime minister to be, among other things, a member of the country’s parliament, and citizenship is required for that.

Still, lots of people encouraged Trump to pursue the idea.

Others claimed the idea would be a mere formality.

And some people were just flabbergasted that a US president would even make such a comment.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Harry Styles Announces Tweaks To His Latest Live Show After Fans' Complaints

Published

on

Harry Styles on stage in Amsterdam last week
Harry Styles on stage in Amsterdam last weekHarry Styles on stage in Amsterdam last week

Harry Styles has confirmed his team is currently in the process of making tweaks to his current tour after fans complained about not being able to see him.

Last week, the Aperture singer kicked off his Together, Together world tour with the first series of shows in his 10-night residency at Amsterdam’s Johan Cruijff Arena.

Unfortunately, once the concerts got underway, many fans standing on the floor felt that the layout of the elaborate stage meant that, for much of the show, they weren’t able to see Harry or his opening act, Robyn.

On Wednesday afternoon, Harry released a statement which read: “We’ve heard concerns from some fans regarding sightline obstructions on the floor. We want every person in the room to have the best experience possible, and we are actively working on making adjustments to improve visibility, while keeping everyone’s safety a priority.”

Addressing the planned changes more specifically, the statement continued: “Beginning Friday, the front bridges will be altered in Amsterdam and London. For future venues, we are working as quickly as possible to make adjustments that also fit within safety code and local compliance.

Advertisement

“In the meantime, temporary barricade adjustments have been made to the left and right front [general admission] puts for [Wednesday’s] show to improve stage visibility.”

“Thank you for your patience, understanding and for being part of the Together, Together tour with us,” the statement concluded. “We love dancing with all our friends.”

Harry’s latest tour is in support of his fourth album Kiss All The Time. Disco, Occasionally, which reached number one on both sides of the Atlantic earlier this year.

Advertisement

The world jaunt consists of longer residencies at select venues around the globe, including 12 nights at London’s Wembley Stadium and a staggering 30 dates at New York’s iconic Madison Square Garden spread out across August and October.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025