A Swiss Olympics commentator has done what no British counterpart will do – challenge why genocidal Israel is allowed to compete.

Stefan Renna, who works for Swiss Radio and Television (RTS), pointed out that bobsled racer Adam Edelman calls himself “Zionist to the core“. Edelman has also made numerous social media posts supporting Israel’s Gaza genocide. Renna even used the g-word – genocide – that terrifies UK corporate ‘journalists’, referring to the findings of the UN International Commission of Inquiry, adding:

I am familiar with this terminology. Edelman described Israel’s military intervention as the most moral and just war in history.

Renna reminded viewers that Ukrainian skeleton athlete Vladyslav Heraskevych had been banned from wearing a helmet featuring photos of those who died in the war in his country. And he even dared to point out the hypocrisy of the Olympics committee banning Russians who supported that country’s war in Ukraine – yet welcoming openly genocidal Israelis:

Renna’s point was well made, legally watertight, and morally flawless. So of course he has been viciously targeted by the Israel lobby for his ‘rant’. Oh for a fraction of his backbone among the cowardly and hypocritical UK ‘mainstream’ media.

Featured image via the Canary

Portugal has established itself as a frontrunner in sustainable tourism, blending its rich cultural heritage with eco-friendly practices. Many travellers appreciate the abundance of holiday villas in Portugal that align seamlessly with these initiatives, highlighting a commitment that sets a benchmark for other nations.

In recent years, Portugal has become synonymous with sustainable tourism, drawing visitors who value environmental stewardship. Enjoying Portugal villa holidays provides a way to protect the countries landscapes by engaging with responsible travel across various sectors. These holidays have gained popularity among those seeking an eco-conscious getaway. As you explore this picturesque country, you’ll discover how its green initiatives are transforming the travel experience while safeguarding its cherished ecosystems. For travellers seeking a villa in Portugal that embraces sustainability, the options continue to grow.

Why Portugal is a top holiday destination

Portugal consistently ranks as a top holiday destination due to its favourable climate, stunning coastline, rich gastronomy, and reputation for safety. The Algarve and Lisbon Coast are particularly renowned for their breathtaking beaches and vibrant cultural scenes. Additionally, the Portuguese countryside offers tranquil retreats with picturesque landscapes, making it ideal for travellers seeking both relaxation and adventure.

These regions provide diverse experiences that cater to different preferences, from exploring historic cities to enjoying outdoor activities like hiking and surfing. Portugal’s commitment to preserving its natural beauty while offering modern amenities enhances its appeal to tourists worldwide. This balance of tradition and innovation ensures that visitors can enjoy a memorable holiday experience in this captivating country. Booking holiday rentals in Portugal has become a preferred choice for those who appreciate both privacy and the chance to experience the local culture authentically.

Beyond its natural attractions, Portugal boasts a welcoming atmosphere that makes visitors feel at home from the moment they arrive. The Portuguese people are known for their warm hospitality and genuine friendliness, creating an inviting environment for international travellers. The country’s excellent infrastructure, including well-maintained roads, reliable public transportation, and modern airports, ensures seamless travel throughout the region. With its affordable cost of living compared to other Western European destinations, Portugal offers exceptional value without sacrificing quality, making it accessible to travellers with varying budgets.

Many visitors also opt for a holiday villa in Portugal when seeking more authentic experiences in smaller towns. Whether exploring coastal hotspots or venturing inland, a Villa holiday in Portugal provides exclusive comfort and opportunities for cultural immersion.

The benefits of holiday villas over hotels

Choosing a holiday villa in Portugal offers numerous advantages over traditional hotel stays. Villas provide more space, privacy, and flexibility, making them perfect for families and groups. Guests can enjoy private pools, expansive outdoor areas, and fully equipped kitchens, allowing for personalised experiences tailored to their needs.

Holiday villas also offer greater value by accommodating larger groups at a lower cost per person compared to hotels. This option allows travellers to enjoy luxurious amenities and scenic locations without compromising on budget. By opting for a Villa holiday in Portugal, visitors can immerse themselves in the local culture while enjoying the comforts of home.

Booking through specialists versus large platforms

Booking a holiday villa through trusted villa rental specialists in Portugal offers distinct advantages over using large platforms. Specialists provide personalised service and expert knowledge of the local area, ensuring guests find the perfect accommodation for their needs. They often manage professionally maintained villas, guaranteeing high standards of cleanliness and comfort. For travellers who prefer holiday villas in Portugal, specialized booking services frequently deliver unmatched value and peace of mind.

These specialists also offer exclusive access to unique properties and insider tips on local attractions and activities. By choosing a specialist, travellers benefit from a tailored experience that enhances their holiday, providing peace of mind and ensuring a memorable stay. Whether you seek a villa in Portugal near the coast or a quiet countryside retreat, these experts can match you with the ideal accommodation. This approach contrasts with the often impersonal experience of booking through large platforms, where customer service and local insights may be limited.

Portugal’s global leadership in sustainable tourism

Portugal’s comprehensive approach to sustainable tourism positions it as a global leader in balancing visitor satisfaction with environmental preservation. By integrating government policies with community-led initiatives, the country has created a blueprint for responsible travel that other nations can emulate. The success of Portugal villa holidays serves as a testament to the effectiveness of these strategies in attracting tourists while safeguarding natural resources.

The ongoing commitment to sustainability ensures that a holiday villa in Portugal remains an attractive option for discerning travellers who prioritise eco-friendly practices. As nations worldwide grapple with the challenges of balancing economic growth with environmental protection, Portugal stands out as an inspiring example of how thoughtful policies and community engagement can lead to lasting positive change.

5 min read19 min

When I stood for Parliament in 1997 my Conservative Party opponent put out leaflets claiming local young people would be in danger if “bent Ben” won.

I had expected my opponents to exploit the fact I was gay. Homophobia was still rampant in much of the media. Chris Smith was the lone openly gay man in Parliament. Gay people were still subject to a raft of discriminatory laws. 

This was the era of “Section 28”, the law passed by the Thatcher Government in 1988 banning the “promotion of homosexuality’. It originated from a backlash against the growing visibility of gay and lesbian people that followed the decriminalisation of homosexuality in 1967. Stonewall was founded to campaign to repeal Section 28 and to pursue LGBT rights more generally.

I had been lucky to enjoy an easy coming out for someone of my generation when I was 18. My family and friends were supportive, and I was convinced the public was further ahead on LGBT rights than the media or the political parties. 

This seemed borne out when I won Exeter from the Conservatives with the biggest swing in southwest England and became the first person selected and elected to Parliament as openly gay. 

This was a hopeful time for LGBT people. The new Labour Government had a modest but encouraging set of proposals for reform, including the repeal of Section 28.

By the end of its time in office, it had scrapped Section 28, equalised the age of consent, ended the ban on gays in the military, approved gay adoption, banned discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, introduced Civil Partnerships and passed the Gender Recognition and Equality Acts. 

All these reforms were hard fought, and the Government had to resort to the rarely used Parliament Act to force the equal age of consent through the House of Lords. Stonewall’s pragmatic but principled campaigning was key to achieving all these reforms.

Prejudice did not disappear overnight. I struggled for some time to get a parliamentary “spouses pass” for my husband, so we could have the occasional dinner together during late night sittings. Colleagues received invitations to events for their wives and husbands, while the gay MPs didn’t, and when the MPs’ expenses scandal broke, a newspaper carried a full page of outrage at the fact that MPs in same sex partnerships were subject to the same rules as straight ones. 

But protection and equality under the law were preconditions for the rapid improvement in media and public attitudes. When I became the first Minister to have a civil partnership in 2006, there was hardly a ripple of hostility; instead, an outpouring of love and good wishes. 

When David Cameron took up the cause of LGBT equality and then legislated for Equal Marriage, it seemed progress was secure and a broad political consensus had been achieved. 

But, as we come together again to mark LGBT history month in 2026, it is clear that confidence was misplaced.

Hard-won rights are under threat of being rolled back and some already have been. The UK has fallen from the top position it enjoyed in the European LGBT Equality Index in 2015 years to 22nd today. Social media has often provided a platform for bigotry and abuse that we’d hoped had become a thing of the past. 

The ban against conversion practices has been promised for seven years, by four Prime Ministers but has yet to materialise. This Government has promised time and time again; it will be delivered by the end of this parliamentary session.

Hate crime affecting LGBT people is rising again and trans people are feeling particularly vulnerable after last year’s Supreme Court ruling and the uncertainly that continues in its wake, as we await the statutory guidance from an EHRC that has deeply damaged its relationship with the public.

Many of the current tropes peddled about trans people remind me of those spread about gay people in the 1980s. That they are a “threat” to women or young people, or that giving them same rights as everyone else, simply to be themselves, diminishes everyone else’s rights. 

The changes put forward this month by Government to change the law and put LGBTQ+ hate crime on an equal footing with racial and religious hate crime, although long overdue, is another step forward on the journey to equality that Stonewall has campaigned for relentlessly. An appropriate way to mark LGBT History month, it will be the first legislative change since Same Sex marriage was passed, and is another important step in the journey to LGBTQ+ equality.

Generations of queer people, like me, have benefitted from the work of Stonewall and other human rights and equality organisations. With our freedoms and protections under threat, it is now time to give something back. 

That is why I am delighted to have joined the Stonewall Board. The arguments we thought we had had, need making afresh and winning again. 

Stonewall’s task is to once again turn this tide of hate, defend our rights and secure those not yet won for the generations to come. 

Sir Ben Bradshaw is a former Labour Minister and current Stonewall Trustee

Illustration by: Tracy Worrall

12 min read9 min

None of this is new. Nearly two decades ago the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB)  expressed concern that MPs’ “casework appears to be growing inexorably”.

At the time MPs’ offices were complaining that they were dealing with a few hundred letters a week, as well as phone calls and the occasional, still relatively novel, email. Today MPs routinely post casework figures on their social media that imply they are dealing with tens of thousands of cases a year.

Some of the drivers are well understood: public services in decline, the pandemic, and technology that eases communication. But also at the heart of the ever-expanding workload is a deep confusion over what MPs, shared in no little measure by the members themselves, are actually for.

The absence of reliable data on casework illustrates the point. Speak to somebody in an MP’s office and they can give you figures on their caseload, now usually drawn from the casework management software that many use.

But – because MPs are effectively treated like 650 small businesses – nobody sees it as their job to collect and collate this data. This makes it difficult to avoid over-generalising about their experiences, especially given that constituencies can vary considerably, as can MPs’ own approaches to their work: some still have earnings from employment outside of the Commons, although the nature of this work varies as well.

Necessary caveats aside, it is clear that many MPs, irrespective of party, are experiencing high workloads that have sharply increased even in the last few years.

When Hollie Wickens first began working for a Labour MP in the late 2010s, the office might expect to receive around 1,000 emails per month. Her current MP’s office, she says, can now receive double that. Ben Lake, the Plaid Cymru MP for Ceredigion Preseli, has likewise noticed an increase. In 2017, when he was first elected to Parliament, he might open 40 new cases per month – compared to 150 per month now. While numbers have been steadily on the rise for decades, “Covid changed everything,” says Lake. Initially, many MPs thought that the rise in casework during the pandemic would eventually subside. But it never has.

Demand has not only increased: it has done so more consistently across the year. The dips in casework that used to happen over the summer have faded, meaning that there is less chance to catch up. “We’re just keeping our noses above water most of the year,” says Charlotte Nichols, Labour MP for Warrington. Estelle Warhurst, an MP office manager with over 20 years’ experience, uses strikingly similar language: “There’s no downtime any more. No chance to catch up. We’re fighting to keep our head above water.”

Within these numbers are two main categories of correspondence: casework, and policy and campaign enquiries. Though they can entail different amounts of work, both are on the rise.

Policy and campaign enquiries – which can range from specific questions about an MP’s stance on a particular issue to mass-generated campaign emails – tend to make up a larger share of the inbox than casework.

Although casework may be a smaller part of the inbox, it usually entails more work. Some pieces of casework can be straightforward to deal with, while others are much more complicated. And it isn’t always easy to initially judge what work will be required. Warhurst points out that the issue a constituent presents with may only be the tip of the iceberg. One piece of casework could generate several email chains, as well as calls and meetings. And it can involve working with government departments, local councils, NHS trusts, or even private companies providing public services. Navigating this is a skill, and some MPs seek out staff with experience in addressing the kinds of issues that crop up time and again in their casework, for example SEND.

Because both casework and policy enquiries are growing so much, MPs must prioritise. Generally – and unsurprisingly – those wanting specific and sometimes urgent help tend to get dealt with first. When it comes to dealing with policy and campaign enquiries, approaches vary. Some MPs will try and write individual responses where they can, especially to specific policy enquiries (rather than mass campaign emails). Lizzi Collinge, who represents Morecambe and Lunesdale for Labour, points out that this is often a helpful way of thinking through policy issues. But, Collinge says, it takes time.

The trade-offs are often not understood by the public. This can drive frustration. Sometimes people assume that they’ve received a “boilerplate” response that has actually been specifically written for them.

Put together, all this can exert a toll on both MPs and staff – even if most will say it can be rewarding. In a 2025 staff survey, more than half agreed it could be “emotionally draining”. Laura Gherman, who previously worked for a senior Conservative MP, says burnout is a growing problem. “Nothing we do ever feels good enough,” adds Wickens. MPs are not immune to this either. It is “relentless”, to the extent that you can begin to question whether you’re doing a good enough job, says Nichols, who estimates that she can have 400 outstanding emails at any one time.

Then there is the nature of some of the work. Warhurst is aware that staff can sometimes find themselves dealing with constituents in the midst of severe mental health crises to the point of being suicidal. This is not the kind of thing that can simply be forgotten about at the end of the working day.

Beyond the impact on staff is the deeper issue of what this rising tide of work is doing to MPs’ abilities to do other work. Almost two decades ago, the SSRB fretted that casework “detracts from [MPs’] other roles of scrutinising legislation and holding the executive to account”. Scepticism about MPs’ roles as ‘super-councillors’ has persisted for years, but have we normalised something that should be aberrant?

Casework has “taken over MPs’ offices”, says Gherman, to the extent that it can make it hard to deal with anything else. Lake agrees that “MPs cannot be omnicompetent”, arguing that “we need more MPs with a bit of bandwidth to think” about legislation, as well as big policy challenges.

Government and public services are often a confusing patchwork… But everybody knows that they have an MP

Advertisement

The plain truth is that the way that many MPs perform their roles is shaped more by facts on the ground –  in particular, rising casework – than by a broader society-wide debate about what the purpose of MPs is.

Marcial Boo, who headed Ipsa (Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority), for six years, says “every MP has their own view on what should change”. That no one body speaks for MPs makes it difficult to reach agreement – even if one was possible.

Some want more resource, others more flexibility. Others focus on increasing staff pay bands and giving more opportunities for progression in an effort to boost retention. AI might help to some degree – but even if MPs were able to agree on what steps to take, many of these things would only help to manage the growing caseload and its effects, rather than deal with the factors driving it. As Dr Rebecca McKee, an expert on MPs’ staffing arrangements, wrote in a 2019 report, changes “have offered relatively short-term solutions and the evolution of staff funding has lacked an explicit overarching vision of the role of an MP, what support they need, and how it can most effectively be delivered”. A more sustainable approach would be to ask some fundamental questions about what is driving rising caseloads and what this means for MPs.

A key driver of rising caseloads is what the mySociety researcher Alex Parsons calls “failure management”, in which MPs are increasingly first and last resort for constituents experiencing problems from across bits of the state. One MP echoed this, reflecting that their inbox indicates “everybody seems to be under an inordinate amount of pressure” and often deals with people “who have been badly let down” by other services, that are themselves overstretched.

This highlights another driver of ever-higher caseloads: confusion about which bits of the state do what, and where to go to get issues dealt with. Government and public services are often a confusing patchwork in the UK, meaning it is hard to know who has primary responsibility for a particular issue or the power to solve it. But everybody knows that they have an MP. Many of the issues that come up in inboxes, like potholes or planning, are somebody else’s responsibility.

Constituents can think that MPs have more power than they do. Hollie Wickens found when she first began working for an MP that “people think they are Batman and can go and solve any problem”.

These factors are underpinned by the incentives that many MPs face. Clearly, many parliamentarians have a strong incentive to try and help constituents because they went into politics to try and help people – and casework is a direct, tangible way of doing that. This incentive is even stronger given the very difficult situations that can arrive in the inbox. “MPs think they can do everything and want to do everything,” says Gherman.

Alex Parsons has another take on this. He suggests that the ability of the average backbencher to make policy or legislative change is constrained to the extent that it can be more rewarding for them to focus on helping individual constituents. Because there aren’t good mechanisms in place for many MPs to aggregate their casework and use it to bring about broader change, they instead pursue casework as a sort of “fragmented ombudsman” in which they “are poking the big state when it goes wrong, but not doing it in a joined up way”.

But there are also political incentives. Being regarded as a responsive and engaged MP that is active in the constituency can clearly have electoral benefits. The SSRB suggested as much in 2007, stating that “some MPs appear to welcome or accept [rising casework], at least in part because of the opportunity it offers for them to raise their profile with their constituents”. It is hardly surprising that MPs respond to this – but it goes to show once more how important public views and expectations are about what their elected representatives should do. As Lizzi Collinge puts it, an MP is likely “to receive more praise for spending an hour in a church hall than an hour in a select committee”.

There are no easy ways to unravel these problems. If it is hard to get agreement from MPs on practical steps to address the pressures many of them face, then it is likely to be even harder to reach a consensus on how to tackle the underlying causes of those pressures. That doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t try. And much of this is about more than the views of MPs and their staff, though those matter: it’s about what the public wants, expects and needs.

A recent experiment by Ipsa provides one potential starting point for these overdue public debates. In the autumn of 2025, Ipsa ran its first ever citizens’ forum on MPs’ pay and funding, bringing together 23 members of the public to hear from a range of experts about the workings of MPs and Parliament. At the end of the programme, members of the forum published a statement. “We were surprised to learn of the amount that goes on behind the scenes,” it read. “An important lesson… is that, for many people, what MPs do on a daily basis is not at all clear, and this needs to be the starting place for meaningful discussion on MPs’ role, pay and funding.” This was not the first attempt to understand what the public want from their representatives. Several years previously, in 2022, a citizens’ assembly on democracy, run by the Constitution Unit and Involve, recommended that Parliament play a stronger role in scrutinising government policy and legislation. It remains to be seen what effect, if any, these kinds of efforts will have. But both the citizens’ assembly on democracy and Ipsa’s citizens’ forum highlighted the way that better public awareness of what their elected representatives are doing can start to generate useful discussions.

None of this may feel much like a priority when there are so many other urgent challenges to deal with. But we have to question whether a system which often leaves the public frustrated, and is leaving many MPs and staff exhausted and struggling, is serving anybody in the way that they want. As Marcial Boo puts it, “We could carry on like this for decades. But should we?”

Calculating Casework

With the absence of  any consistent data on workload, a more creative approach is required to find hard numbers. One way of getting a sense of the scale of the issue is to trawl MPs’ social media accounts, which many use to provide updates on casework. 

At the end of 2025, for example, some MPs used Facebook posts to sum up their year in casework. Stuart Anderson, the Conservative MP for South Shropshire, posted that he had dealt with over 9,500 cases during 2025. Up in Halifax, Labour’s Kate Dearden wrote that she had resolved 8,925 cases and responded to 16,764 emails. Dearden’s colleague in Portsmouth South, Stephen Morgan, posted that he’d responded to 21,142 inquiries and handled 11,000 cases. Over in St Albans, the Lib Dems’ Daisy Cooper had resolved over 9,630 cases; Andrew Pakes, Labour (Co-op) MP for Peterborough, over 8,200; and the Conservative James Wild, in North West Norfolk, 6,825. 

These were all figures for just one year. Over the course of an MPs’ time in office, the numbers can be eye watering: Luke Evans posted in February 2025 that he had dealt with over 32,500 enquiries since he was first elected Tory MP for Hinckley and Bosworth some 1,900 days before.

Alice Lilly is a senior researcher at The Institute for Government

(Alamy)

1 min read38 min

The Reform leader unveiled four Reform figures for the “great offices of state” at a press conference in London.

Farage on Monday said he believed it was time to move away from the “potential criticism” that the party was just about him. Jenrick, a former minister, who defected to the party in January will be Farage’s economic spokesperson and will take charge of the Treasury if Reform win the next general election.

Zia Yusuf, Reform’s head of policy, was announced as the party’s shadow home secretary. He promised to stop the Channel crossings and derogate from any international treaty which frustrates or upends deportations.

Farage announced that Richard Tice will be deputy prime minister and secretary for business, trade and energy.

Suella Braverman was appointed Reform UK’s new shadow secretary of state for education and skills, completing his shadow cabinet appointments. Braverman will also be tasked on taking on the “world of DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion]” in her new brief. Lee Anderson, who was the first Tory MP to defect to Reform, will remain as the party’s chief whip.

Reform MPs Danny Kruger, Andrew Rosindell, Sarah Pochin are yet to receive official roles.

Outrage is rightly growing at the decision of the UK government to award a huge NHS contract to genocide-collaborating US software firm Palantir. The company’s CEO Alex Karp is just one of its unhinged top executives – but he’s way (way, way, way) out there. And he’s perfectly prepared to say out loud that there are few, if any, tactics he’s not ready to resort to. Including spraying piss laced with a deadly drug onto journalists he doesn’t like:

Karp: “You need a higher purpose, and I think you often need a lower purpose.”

Andrew Sorkin: “What’s your lower purpose?”

Karp: “I love the idea of getting a drone and having light fentanyl-laced urine spraying on analysts that tried to screw us.”

Fentanyl is a deadly opioid drug 50-100 times stronger than heroin. US president Donald Trump uses fake claims of shipping it as an excuse to murder fishermen and kidnap Venezuela’s president – with the help of Karp’s company. Dealing in fentanyl is terrorism, according to Trump. Karp, however, wants to spray it on innocent critics – but clearly that’s ok because he’s a Trump backer.

It ought to be unbelievable, but isn’t, that this isn’t an aberration for Karp – or even his wildest comment. In 2025, he boasted of how his company kills people for profit. He is also a fan of genocide who has claimed that the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians Palantir helped Israel murder in Gaza are “mostly terrorists”:

Palantir shouldn’t be anywhere near the NHS. It should be banned altogether in the UK and in a sane world Karp should be on trial for genocide.

Featured image via the Canary