Connect with us

Politics

UAE denies attacking Iran, slams Israel’s lies

Published

on

UAE

UAE

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) government has furiously denied any role in an attack on an Iranian water desalination plant on Sunday 8 March 2026 — and has slammed Israel’s attempts to claim that the UAE committed the attack.

A UAE government source said that the government is:

struggling to understand Israeli conduct and the nature of briefings coming out of Jerusalem.

It is not appropriate for what is described as a ‘senior Israeli source’ to speak on our behalf or spread rumors about the actions of another sovereign state. This is a sovereign state that makes its decisions independently.

Israel has reportedly conducted a number of ‘false flag’ attacks on water and oil facilities of Arab states in the region in an attempt to force them and western nations to enter direct action against Iran. The occupation colony has a long and well-documented record of using such attacks for political ends. Saudi Arabia and Qatar arrested Mossad spies shortly after bombings of their facilities.

Advertisement

Iranian drones and missiles have struck US bases in various Arab states around the region since the illegal US-Israeli ‘Epstein class’ attack that murdered Iranian political and spiritual leaders, slaughtered more than 160 schoolgirls and destroyed at least six Iranian hospitals.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Politics Home Article | UK “Stands Ready” To Support Emergency International Energy Reserves

Published

on

UK 'Stands Ready' To Support Emergency International Energy Reserves
UK 'Stands Ready' To Support Emergency International Energy Reserves

Chancellor Rachel Reeves joined a virtual meeting with G7 finance ministers to discuss the situation in the Middle East (Alamy)


3 min read

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has confirmed the UK is ready to back a coordinated release of International Energy Agency oil reserves to help stabilise fuel prices, as the Middle East conflict continues.

Advertisement

Reeves gave a statement to the House of Commons after meeting with G7 finance ministers on Monday afternoon, as part of wider efforts to coordinate an international economic response to the Iran conflict’s impact on global energy security and markets.

The Chancellor said that in the meeting, she emphasised the need for “immediate de-escalation” of the conflict and a return to the diplomatic process. 

She sought to reassure the public as the UK braces for further energy price shocks and market volatility. Oil prices have spiked in the Middle East, and oil shipping routes have been disrupted as the conflict between Iran, the US and Israel continues.

Advertisement

“I know that families and businesses will be concerned about the impact of this conflict on them,” Reeves said, before confirming that the UK is ready to support a coordinated release of collective International Energy Agency oil reserves.

Reeves said she has explicitly asked the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to be vigilant across energy prices, including essentials like road fuel and heating oil, stressing she will “not tolerate any company exploiting the current crisis to make excess benefits at consumers’ expense”.

The move is intended to reassure motorists and households that the government is monitoring supply‑chain pricing and looking to prevent opportunistic price gouging at a time of heightened energy insecurity.

Advertisement

The Chancellor also announced that the Treasury has approved Ministry of Defence (MoD) access to the Treasury’s special reserve to fund additional military capabilities in the Middle East.

She said this would ensure that “no net additional costs of these operations will be funded by the MoD, but instead will be funded by the Treasury”.

Reeves said the UK will also play its part as the global hub of maritime insurance, and is due to meet with the chair of Lloyds of London later on Monday to discuss how to support the continued passage of maritime trade.

Highlighting the importance of boosting domestic energy resilience, Reeves confirmed that the government will publish its response “in the coming days” to the Fingleton review of nuclear regulation, a key step she said will help “build nuclear power more quickly”.

Advertisement

Reeves said inflation was likely to rise in the coming months, but financial markets were continuing to function normally. In response to her statement, Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride said: “These are very serious and concerning times, and the developments in the Middle East are already having profound consequences for our economy.

“Oil prices have surged above $100 a barrel for the first time since the 2022 energy crisis. That alone is enough to have huge knock-on effects for households and businesses.”

He accused the government of making the economy “weaker” and pointed out that inflation remains elevated.

“That is far from ideal, given the threat of a significant further spike in energy prices,” he continued.

Advertisement

“And of course, extraordinarily, the Chancellor has just now reconfirmed that the government will press ahead with a rise in fuel duty later this year, and borrowing is running higher than was forecast when the government took office.”

 

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Private dentists becoming only option

Published

on

Private dentists becoming only option

The number of people in hardship who are having to pay for private dentists has almost doubled in two years, according to new research by Healthwatch England.

A survey commissioned by the independent health watchdog found 27% of people who described themselves as ‘struggling financially’ had used a private dentist in 2025 compared to 14% in 2023.

A lack of dentists offering NHS appointments, particularly in more deprived areas, and there being no guaranteed right to care from an NHS dentist are fueling the rise in people going private.

Rebecca Curtayne, acting head of policy, public affairs and research at Healthwatch England, said:

Advertisement

Our findings are a warning that for some people, there’s only one tier dental care — private. And it’s the most vulnerable people in our society who bear the brunt of the ongoing shortage of NHS dental appointments.

The government won’t end health inequalities until it fixes NHS dentistry. Too many people on low incomes are being forced into private care they struggle to afford, or are going without treatment altogether. The system is failing those who need it most.

Use of private dentists up since 2023

People living in deprived areas who can’t find an NHS dentist, and feel they have no choice but to pay for private dental care, are potentially penalised twice, the report highlights.

They must pay significantly more for the same treatment, up to £75 for a routine examination that costs £27.40 via the NHS, and patients who are exempt from NHS dental charges, such as pregnant people, will lose the benefit of the exemption.

The data is from Healthwatch’s upcoming report, The public’s perspective: The state of health and social care, and based on a poll of nearly 2,600 adults in England last year.

Advertisement

It shows the number of adults who have sought private dentistry increased by 10 percentage points to almost a third (32%).

Between 2023 and 2025, the share of people who consider themselves ‘financially comfortable’ who reported using private dentistry also rose from 30% to 36%.

Financially comfortable households are still more likely to use private care, but the gap between the two groups has narrowed sharply.

Curtayne continued:

Advertisement

It’s positive to see that public’s confidence in NHS dentistry has increased slightly. The government needs to build on this, by improving access to NHS dentistry especially in rural and more deprived areas, and setting out its plans for fundamental reform of the NHS dental contract.

These plans should aim to give everyone the right to a permanent NHS dentist, in the same way people get a local NHS GP care who is there for both new and urgent problems.

Healthwatch England is calling for the government to introduce a legal right for people to register with an NHS dentist for life, similarly to their GP, and to review NHS dental charges amongst other reforms to help improve access to dental care.

Featured image via Pixabay

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Bridgerton Cast Try NOT to Fail A Regency Trivia Quiz

Published

on

Bridgerton Cast Try NOT to Fail A Regency Trivia Quiz

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”567053a0-c86a-4707-b2f4-65c4e0d1c1af”}).render(“69aed53de4b06c543ae38ab7”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Camilla meets Gisele Pelicot in hypocritical move

Published

on

Camilla meets Gisele Pelicot in hypocritical move

Sky News reported that Queen Camilla has met with courageous Gisèle Pelicot and was apparently left “speechless” after reading the memoir penned by the French rape survivor. Pelicot had been touring the UK to promote her book ‘Hymn to Life: Shame Has To Change Sides’ at the time and joined Camilla at Clarence House. Pelicot has received widespread support and respect for her courage in exposing the extensive, sinister abuse she endured at the hands of her husband and his sick pals.

Her case made shockwaves across the world as victims and survivors of sexual abuse drew strength from her bravery. Pelicot waived her anonymity at the time of trial so that the offences and those involved would become public knowledge. Like the title of her book, she intends to ensure that shame is felt by the abusers and not their victims.

Camilla and hypocrisy

However, the hypocrisy at play is difficult to ignore. Camilla has made little effort to centre the victims connected to the so-called Epstein files or to address the role powerful men played in perpetrating such traumatic abuse against young girls and women. Perhaps she will draw inspiration from the courage of Gisèle Pelicot and begin speaking truth to powerful men while prioritising the suffering of their victims.

After all, both cases involve networks of men who believed they had the right to do whatever they wanted to their victims. The case draws clear parallels with the thousands of pages connected to the Epstein network of elites, which included her brother-in-law, the disgraced former prince Andrew.

Advertisement

On the other hand, she will likely just continue prioritising the comfort of those powerful men whilst being careful to maintain public appearances.

Parallels between Pelicot’s case and the Epstein Files

The optics here are, at best, disingenuous and, at worst, a sucker punch to victims and survivors of the sinister web of sexual abuse and rape linked to Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump and their associates. The extraordinary bravery of Gisèle Pelicot led to 50 men being convicted of rape or sexual offences, exposing a horrifying network in which her husband repeatedly drugged her unconscious and allowed other men to assault her.

The so-called ‘Epstein files’ similarly revealed a web of powerful men exploiting women and girls to satisfy their own fantasies. At the same time, the abuse appears to have served as a double-edged weapon: by creating compromising situations and images involving influential figures, those involved could wield power on a far more lucrative and political scale.

Advertisement

We have written extensively on the revelations borne from the release of the Epstein Files.

Speaking about the Royal Family’s failure to recognise victims of abuse in connection to Epstein and arrogant paedo-prince Andrew, the Canary wrote:

Undoubtedly, the Royal Family feel discomfort around this issue. But that discomfort pales in comparison to the serious trauma experienced by victims of sexual abuse. Shamefully, the monarchy deepens that trauma by showing palpable disinterest in the harm powerful men cause.

Another reminder that they will never be on our side.

Stop pretending you care and ACTUALLY do something

Powerful white women have much to answer for in British society. If they prioritised solidarity with victims over solidarity with the powerful, we would make far greater progress in holding those men accountable for the harm they have inflicted.

Sexual fantasies should never take precedence over the victims who must live with that trauma for the rest of their lives. Gisèle Pelicot’s advocacy and determination cannot have been easy; women who have suffered such violations rarely find it easy to expose that depth of pain. Nevertheless, she has spoken out to raise awareness about the disturbing realities of abuse and to show how even those we trust most can commit some of the worst assaults.

Therefore, this should have been an opportunity for Camilla to raise the need for thorough investigations into powerful men in the UK, who sit in positions of trust and responsibility. Instead, she has continued to look away, just like the rest of the royal family, when the call is very much coming from inside the house.

Until the royals actually engage with the implications of the Epstein files for Andrew’s behaviour, it’s hard to take platitudes from them about violence against women remotely seriously.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

HuffPost Headlines 3-9

Published

on

HuffPost Headlines 3-9

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”5d031407-17c9-42cd-8e8f-162817d7c409″}).render(“69aef22ee4b0fe5c2e75e721”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Covid day of reflection sees Lisa Nandy skewered

Published

on

Covid day of reflection sees Lisa Nandy skewered

Lisa Nandy shared some trite words on the government’s Covid-19 Day of Reflection. And rightly, disabled people ripped her to fucking shreds.

Covid Day of Reflection: lockdown through rose-tinted specs

According to the government, on March 8:

the nation will reflect and come together to remember those that lost their lives and to honour the tireless work and acts of kindness shown by many during the pandemic.

Of course, what actually happened was a few bullshit words and brushing the fact that COVID-19 still exists under the carpet.

Case in point, Lisa Nandy tweeted:

Advertisement

Today marks the national Covid-19 Day of Reflection.

Every one of us was impacted. My thoughts are with people who experienced loss and still carry the effects of the pandemic.

We also honour the dedication of our NHS staff, key workers and volunteers who helped us through.

Every March now, disabled people experience untold anger at the way “the pandemic years” are portrayed through rose-tinted glasses by politicians, the media, and even a lot of the general public.

They reminisce about banging pots and pans for the NHS instead of the government actually giving healthcare workers extra funding.

Advertisement

They laugh over socially distanced street parties while families couldn’t even hug at funerals. And get misty-eyed over Zoom games nights, talking about being “trapped” indoors.

When disabled people, who were actually abandoned in their homes, are ignored and still to this day derided.

Even though we know just how many of our community died and how many more disabled people Covid-19 is still creating.

Lisa Nandy ripped to shreds

A lot of hatred was rightly heaped onto the Tories for their handling of 2020, but it’s the way Labour is treating disabled people now that should also be in the spotlight.

Advertisement

Which is why Lisa Nandy’s tweet hit a nerve:

She’s correct in saying every one of us was impacted, but some of us far more than others. Nandy’s vast, wide-ranging hypocrisy was swiftly pointed out in the quote tweets.

Nandy turned off comments. Judging by the amount of anti-vaxxers in the quotes, this almost makes sense. But it also sent a clear message to disabled people that Labour don’t want your outlook either.

Some pointed out that COVID has not gone away, and Labour are doing nothing to stop it

But others, angry at the Labour planned cuts, pointed out just how dangerous Nandy’s party are for disabled people since COVID-19 started

This, from a former NHS key worker, is heartbreaking:

This is who the Labour Party really is

For all their platitudes about ‘honouring’ key workers and protecting people, they don’t give a fuck about disabled people. If they did, the DWP wouldn’t be trying to make it harder to claim PIP and slashing Universal Credit for new claimants.

At the end of the day, if successive governments hadn’t spent years demonising disabled people, it wouldn’t have been so easy for people to accept so many disabled deaths by COVID-19.

Advertisement

And that is the uncomfortable truth Labour needs to live with. Enough of the bullshit, politicians caused all these deaths. Now they get to have them on their conscience.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

G7 Decides Against Deploying Emergency Oil Reserves

Published

on

G7 Decides Against Deploying Emergency Oil Reserves

The G7 will not dip into its stockpiles of oil and gas after a call between its constituent nations’ finance ministers, according to French Finance Minister Roland Lescure. They spoke – including Reeves – in the past hour to discuss the possibility… The International Energy Agency co-ordinates activity of the G7 Strategic Petroleum Reserve. During…

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Why Trump’s War In Iran Is Set To Make Us All Worse Off

Published

on

Fire and a plume of smoke is visible after, according to authorities, debris of an Iranian intercepted drone hit the Fujairah oil facility, in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, March 3, 2026.

Donald Trump’s war in Iran is set to have a trickle-down effect on prices around the world – meaning we could all end up worse off as a result.

The US president caused international chaos after he decided to work with Israel to launch strikes against Iran more than a week ago.

In retaliation, Tehran released missiles and drones on the neighbouring Gulf countries which are home to various US military bases.

It also effectively closed the Straits of Hormuz – the narrow stretch of water between the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman – by attacking the ships which travel through it.

Advertisement

About 20 million barrels of oil moves through the strait each day. That’s around a fifth of the world’s supply.

With the oil industry under threat, the global energy market is on unsteady ground – meaning everyone’s pockets are about to be hit.

Here’s what you need to know.

Petrol Prices Set To Go Up

Advertisement

The disruption in the Middle East is already sending the cost of Brent crude oil up.

It exceeded $105 (£78) a barrel on Monday, which is its highest price point in almost two years.

Gas has not increased in price this quickly since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, a time when the west tried to rapidly wean itself off Moscow’s cheap oil exports.

Higher wholesale energy prices result in higher prices at the petrol pumps.

Advertisement

The average cost of a litre of unleaded petrol was at 137.51p on Monday, while diesel cost 150.97p, according to the automotive services RAC – but both prices are expected to rise.

However, motorists have been urged not to panic-buy as this could be short-lived.

RAC’s head of policy Simon Williams told The Times: “We really shouldn’t see a shock jump in prices because wholesale fuel costs have only been rising gradually.

“Even though the price of Brent crude has risen, the impact of this shouldn’t be felt for more than a week.”

Advertisement

Still, he predicted that unleaded would reach an average of 140p in the next week or so while diesel may go up to 160p.

Meanwhile, the Petrol Retailers Association has already written to chancellor Rachel Reeves requesting she drops plans to hike fuel duty later this year.

Trump – who is a multi-billionaire – has tried to downplay the impact of rising oil prices.

He wrote on TruthSocial: “Short term oil prices, which will drop rapidly when the destruction of the Iran nuclear threat is over, is a very small price to pay for USA, and World, Safety and Peace.”

Advertisement

Energy Bills Expected To Rise

Changes in the oil market will hit energy bills too, as so many businesses and households are reliant on fossil fuels.

Wholesale gas prices in the UK have already increased by as much as 50% after Qatar stopped producing liquified natural gas as a result of the conflict.

The UK is more reliant on gas than many of its European allies though it has been moving towards renewable energy since the Ukraine invasion.

Advertisement

It produces less than half of the gas it needs and imports the rest, meaning UK bills will still be impacted.

The good news is these higher wholesale costs will not trickle down to household budgets until July.

Energy regulator Ofgem controls how much companies can charge customers who are on standard variable tariffs for each unit of gas and electricity with a new amount every three months.

The cap has already been confirmed for April to June – £1,641 per year, for homes which use both oil and gas.

Advertisement

However, the investment firm Stifel has warned that European wholesale gas prices could triple if the Strait of Hormuz closes for more than six weeks.

That would take the cap to £2,500 a year.

Fire and a plume of smoke is visible after, according to authorities, debris of an Iranian intercepted drone hit the Fujairah oil facility, in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, March 3, 2026.
Fire and a plume of smoke is visible after, according to authorities, debris of an Iranian intercepted drone hit the Fujairah oil facility, in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, March 3, 2026.

Interest Rates Expected To Go Up

Approximately 1.2 million borrowers will have their fixed mortgage deals end between now and September, meaning they will be looking to take out a new agreement with the bank.

Mortgage rates were declining and the Bank of England was expected to cut its base rate of interest from 3.75%.

Advertisement

But, the conflict in the Middle East means rates are now likely to go up.

Since Trump first initiated attacks on Iran, swap rates – the rate of interest lenders pay to institutions in return for fixed funding – went up by 0.2 percentage points.

That’s a cost which is likely to be passed onto homeowners.

For savers, a hike in interest rates is normally a positive as it means they get more returns on their savings.

Advertisement

The stock market has stumbled in recent days but investing usually helps to defy the impact of high inflation rates.

Yet, the FTSE 100 – the Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 Index – fell nearly 200 points at one point on Monday, though it has already slightly improved.

Overall Economic Impact

Prominent economist Paul Johnson told Times Radio that the Iran war will likely take “at least half a point off growth” within the economy this year, if the conflict continues.

Advertisement

He said: “That doesn’t sound like much, but that is quite a lot.

“That’s going to create problems for the public finances, and it’s going to make us all worse off.”

He added: “If energy prices are up, the UK and other countries dependent on energy will just be worse off, at least for the period that they’re higher.”

Johnson said the damage could be quite reduced if the war concludes quickly – but if it doesn’t, we could be in for “another couple of slightly miserable years.”

Advertisement

Prime minister Keir Starmer also warned on Monday “that the longer this goes on, the more likely the potential for an impact on our economy, impact into the lives and households of everybody and every business”.

Even before the Iran war, the UK economy was already looking rather sluggish at the end of last year, with GDP going up by 0.1% between October and December.

Labour has been promising to improve the UK’s economic growth and address the rising cost of living for years.

But, the longer the conflict goes on, the worse it looks for the government’s plan to implement real change.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Mary Beard: a feminist for Islam?

Published

on

Mary Beard: a feminist for Islam?

Feminists for Islam are strange creatures. Like Queers for Palestine, they are neither fish nor fowl, though they are often very foul indeed. One can imagine these rare beings, after extinction, being commented on with whispering, quizzical solemnity by some future David Attenborough: ‘And then, when they reached their desired destination… they disappeared.’ Kind of like salmon expiring when they finally reach their happy spawning time – except we’re not allowed to eat Queers for Palestine, rendering them neither use nor ornament.

Feminists for Islam are perhaps even odder, like those weird women who write love letters to serial killers. It’s a parody of a ghastly, abusive romantic relationship – suicidal empathy turned ideology, with a soupçon of exceptionalism: ‘Oh, he’d never hurt me!’ But very few of these strange beasts get to write their love letters over several thousand words in the London Review of Books, where in October 2001, the classics professor turned TV pundit, Dame Mary Beard, wrote of the dreadful events of 9/11 that the US ‘had it coming’. ‘World bullies, even if their heart is in the right place, will in the end pay the price… [for their] refusal to listen to what the “terrorists” have to say.’ She also called what al-Qaeda did an ‘extraordinary act of bravery’.

Two-thousand, nine-hundred and seventy-seven people were murdered on 9/11, including more than 400 first responders (among them 343 firefighters and paramedics) and hundreds of plane passengers. Many more have since died due to illnesses linked to toxic exposure at the site of the Twin Towers. They came from 77 different countries – truly ‘diverse’, as opposed to their 19 killers. Colm Tóibín wrote an excellent letter to the LRB about Beard’s essay:

Advertisement

‘Over the past 25 years in Ireland I have made a point of asking anyone who was at school with members of the IRA, the INLA, the UDA and the UVF what these people were like at the age of 10. All have agreed that each child displayed a nasty early sign of terrorism long before he had a “cause”. Had a cause not come their way, these people would have beaten their dogs or their wives and children, attacked one another at hurling matches or taken out their resentment on a long back garden. Would Mary Beard refer to these actions as “extraordinary acts of bravery”?’

As if it couldn’t get worse, AI tells me that Beard is ‘celebrated for her sharp insights, especially on Roman life, women in history and bringing classical studies into mainstream culture, making her a “national treasure”’. Of course she is. The watchwords of NT-ism are ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusivity’ – but the approved views on everything from breakfast to Brexitpenises on women to Palestine, must be held. NTs are the cuddly face of the enemy within, part of the never-ending war against anyone who dares think differently from their betters and wetters. Many are little more than peppy propagandists, there to make us swallow through the medium of sport and entertainment what we have already choked on and vomited up when it was fed to us straight. The UK National Treasure gang can easily embrace a woman who, if she saw her best female friend being ‘done’ by a member of Hamas at one end and a member of Hezbollah at the other, would probably ask the poor woman what she said to provoke them.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

Beard is still writing pash-notes to Islam, but in somewhat shorter form these days, posting on X this week: ‘On the question of whether churches should be allowed to become mosques, let’s remember that the Parthenon was originally a “pagan” temple, then was converted into a Christian church, then became a mosque. This kind of conversion is not historically unusual.’

An X-er calling himself Roman Helmet Guy had a good comeback:

‘Hi, I’m Mary Beard. You should be okay with your churches becoming mosques. Why? Because the Turks once violently conquered the Greeks, then converted their churches into mosques. Were the Greeks okay with that? No, millions died to stop it. But you should be. Trust me, I’m a scholar.’

Advertisement

Does Beard really believe that Islam is having an entirely benign effect on British society, even without turning churches into mosques? What does she think about the status of women in Muslim enclaves? Or about ‘family voting’ (Which makes it sound so cosy, like a ‘family-size’ bag of sweets)? The rape gangs? The petulant complaints about and violent attacks on Christian street preachers? The unparalleled violence and intimidation of our tiny Jewish community? Does she have that miraculous ability, like so many of her Lady Muck type, to only take in the information she wants to take in and dismiss opposing views as simply the great unwashed being silly? Or does a tiny part of her understand that Islam conquers by force – and secretly like the idea?

I’ve reached a stage in life when the extraordinary way some people get their kicks rarely surprises me. But if there’s no masochistic kink involved, the naivety Beard displays is extraordinary in one so lengthily and expensively educated.

Advertisement

Even when, in 2012, she was picked on by the ghastly AA Gill, I found it hard to care, though naturally I’d normally stand up for a woman called ‘too ugly for television’ by a puppet-faced monkey-killer. Referring to Channel 4’s The Undateables, in which various disabled and disfigured people sought love, Gill opined that Beard was ‘this far from being the subject of a Channel 4 dating documentary’ and should be ‘kept away from cameras altogether’. But even to this her response was annoying, whining ‘I was a bit hurt’ and ‘I felt stunned, as if someone had punched me’. Such pearl-clutching, from someone who considered that thousands of innocent people murdered by terrorists ‘had it coming’.

I thought I knew every awful thing about Beard, but in the course of writing this, I’ve discovered a new one. In 2018, after it was reported that Oxfam employees had been sexually exploiting impoverished girls and women, Beard tweeted: ‘Of course one can’t condone the (alleged) behaviour of Oxfam staff in Haiti and elsewhere. But I do wonder how hard it must be to sustain “civilised” values in a disaster zone.’ Unsurprisingly, this led many to respond with revulsion. The wimp then posted a photograph of herself crying, complaining that, ‘I find it hard to imagine that anyone out there could possibly think that I am wanting to turn a blind eye to the abuse of women and children’.

‘I actually can’t understand what it would be to be a woman without being a feminist’, this preposterous woman once said, rather incredibly in the light of her apparent sympathy for male violence over the years. Next time you’re tempted to tweet in support of various vile men, Dame Mary, try taking a look in the mirror first. And brush your hair, while you’re at it.

Advertisement

Julie Burchill is a spiked columnist. Follow her Substack, ‘Notes from the Naughty Step’, here.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

How To Make Perfect Medium-Rare Steaks Every Time

Published

on

How To Make Perfect Medium-Rare Steaks Every Time

Most of us have a Gordon Ramsay-style idea of how to cook a steak: take it out of the fridge, salt it, wait a little, and fry it in a sizzling pan, basting it in butter. Then let it rest.

Hey, I’m not against that. I’ve tried his method and loved it.

But according to some culinary experts, there’s a counterintuitive way to cook a perfectly medium-rare steak that’s got a rich brown crust from edge to juicy edge. And it’s known as “reverse searing”.

What is reverse searing?

Advertisement

When cooking steak, most people expect to sear the protein at the start, when it comes into contact with a very hot pan. The rest of the cooking is done at a lower temperature to allow the meat to actually cook.

But “reverse searing”, well, reverses that.

You slowly, gently cook the steak at first, then sear it at the end. The idea is to avoid that brown-outside, raw-middle problem that happens all too often with “regular” searing.

It also ensures the middle is evenly cooked. And because a nearly-cooked steak is drier than a raw one, reverse-seared steaks have less moisture, according to chef and food writer J Kenji López-Alt, which means that achieving a satisfying crust is much easier.

Advertisement

And lastly, as the enzymes that have been paralysed by your fridge have had a chance to get back into play by the time you’re ready to sizzle your “reverse-seared” steak, it’ll likely turn out more tender.

Does it work for all steaks?

Reverse searing works best for thick steaks. “Ribeye, New York, and filet mignon are great cuts that would provide great results in reverse searing,” chef Sam Shafer told The Takeout.

And writing for Serious Eats, López-Alt wrote that the method is best used on steaks thicker than 3.8-5 cm.

Advertisement

Reverse-searing steak recipe

The steps are pretty simple.

  • Take your steak out of the fridge, season it, and put it in the oven at anywhere from 93-135°C. The higher the temp, the more “done” your steak will be.
  • Wait ’til it’s just under your ideal temperature (54°C for a medium-rare steak, and 60°C for a medium steak). The time this takes will depend on the thickness of your steak; it can be 20-40 minutes.
  • Take it out of the oven and put it into a ripping hot pan with oil. Cook until seared all over.

Another bonus? You don’t have to rest reverse-seared steaks (I’m sold).

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025