Beau Greaves returned to the PDC Women’s Series on Sunday 22 August and immediately re‑established her dominance. Producing back‑to‑back title wins to move within touching distance of her 60th crown on the circuit. After missing Saturday’s action, the Doncaster star arrived at the Matiolli Arena, Leicester with trademark precision. Bringing control and scoring power, collecting her 58th and 59th Women’s Series titles in a single afternoon.

Greaves, now firmly established as the standout force in the women’s game, wasted no time in setting the tone. Her morning campaign began with three consecutive whitewash victories, sweeping aside Jane Hawtin, Sue Lowther and Vicky Pruim without dropping a leg. The early rounds showcased the same ruthless efficiency that has defined her rise, with her scoring consistency and finishing accuracy immediately separating her from the field.

Fightback sparks title charge

Her run towards the Event 19 title was almost halted in the last‑16, where Gemma Hayter pushed her to the brink. Beau Greaves trailed 3‑2 and faced elimination, but the 22‑year‑old responded with the composure that has become her trademark. She reeled off the final legs to turn the match around and book her place in the quarter‑finals, keeping her hopes of a 58th title alive.

From there, she accelerated. Greaves overpowered Aileen de Graaf 5‑1 in the quarter‑finals, producing an average north of 96 and controlling the match from the opening visit. She then dispatched Kirsty Hutchinson 5‑2 in the semi‑finals, maintaining a steady scoring rhythm and leaving little room for resistance.

That set up a repeat of the 2025 Women’s World Matchplay semi‑final, as Greaves faced Lisa Ashton in the Event 19 final. Greaves’ afternoon campaign began in identical fashion. She opened Event 20 with back‑to‑back 4‑0 wins over Leanne Halls and Felicia Bay, once again asserting her authority with clean finishing and relentless scoring. The Doncaster star dropped just three legs across the entire event, underlining the gulf between her and the chasing pack.

Her momentum continued with consecutive 4‑1 victories over Louise Pearson and Rhian O’Sullivan. Both matches in which she controlled the pace and punished every loose visit. She then swept past Angela Kirkwood 5‑0 in the quarter‑finals, producing another display of near‑flawless consistency to reach the final four.

Whitewash seals title number 59

The final brought a rematch with Aileen de Graaf, but the Dutch player struggled to find her rhythm. Beau Greaves capitalised instantly, controlling every leg and producing an average above 91 to complete a 5‑0 whitewash. The victory secured her 59th Women’s Series title and capped a flawless Sunday in which she reasserted her position as the circuit’s dominant force.

Greaves’ ability to maintain high averages across multiple matches, combined with her finishing accuracy and tactical control, continues to set her apart. Her Sunday double not only strengthened her position at the top of the Women’s Series rankings but also moved her within one title of the landmark 60‑title milestone.

Beau Greaves remains firmly on top of the Women’s Series rankings, with Lisa Ashton and Fallon Sherrock occupying second and third place respectively. Gemma Hayter sits just behind them in fourth, currently holding the final qualification spot for the 2026/27 World Darts Championship.

The top three players from the final PDC Women’s Series rankings will qualify for the 2026/27 Paddy Power World Darts Championship, with the top‑ranked player also earning a place at the 2026 Mr Vegas Grand Slam of Darts. Greaves’ Sunday surge has strengthened her grip on both positions, and her form suggests she is well on course to secure both berths.

Beau Greaves: closing in on history

With 59 Women’s Series titles now to her name, Beau Greaves stands on the brink of another milestone. Her return on Sunday was a reminder of her ability to dominate fields with a blend of scoring power, finishing precision and tactical control. The Doncaster star continues to set the standard in the women’s game, and her march towards title number 60 looks increasingly inevitable.

Greaves’ Sunday double was not just a return. It was a statement. After missing Saturday’s action, she re‑entered the circuit with complete authority, sweeping through both events and reaffirming her status as the standout force in women’s darts. With major tournaments approaching and her form showing no sign of slowing, Greaves’ pursuit of further silverware looks set to continue.

Featured image courtesy of BBC Sports

By Faz Ali

Source link

Did you know that supermarkets often add a little-known “Julian date” to packs of fresh fruit and veg?

These usually tell suppliers and stores when the produce was packed and are different from consumer-facing “best before” and “use by” dates.

Some thought that a similar source of information might lie on the bottoms of our toothpaste packs, too.

In 2024, for instance, a viral podcast clip suggested that the little patch may reveal whether the ingredients in the tube are “natural” or “chemical” (though that distinction is impossible to make).

Advertisement

That misinformed claim has since been thoroughly debunked. But it leaves another question – what are the markers actually for, then?

Why are there coloured squares on my toothpaste pack?

According to dental health company Colgate, they’re used in the manufacturing process.

When factories produce packs of toothpaste, they fill the tubes’ contents at speeds as fast as 200 containers a minute. Machines fill the opened cylinders with exact gram amounts of the product.

Then, they need to be closed (usually by heat sealing) to prevent the toothpaste from leaking and to stop bacteria and air from entering the tube.

Advertisement

To do this efficiently, the machine that clamps the containers needs to be given a target.

Colgate explains that these tell “light sensors where the end of the tube is so that it can be cut and sealed properly”.

So… what about the ingredients in my toothpaste?

Again, these have nothing to do with the colour of your toothpaste tube (previous, disproven conspiracy theories suggested that green squares meant an “all-natural” product, while black supposedly revealed “pure chemical” options).

Advertisement

If you’re curious about the contents of your toothpaste, though, there’s a simpler option: look at the ingredients list on the pack.

The NHS does say we should keep an eye out for this section, but not to check the hue of the machine-friendly block.

Instead, the health service advises we check the packaging to find a product that contains at least 1,350 parts per million (ppm) fluoride.

This helps to fight decay and can keep your teeth healthier for longer.

Advertisement

Source link

Source link

On 23 August, academic Priyamvada Gopal who specialises in postcolonial studies (including race and Empire), posted the below, earning the following community note:

If you believe in the existence biological racial differences, you are a racist.

Hope that clears it up.

— Priyamvada Gopal © (@PriyamvadaGopal) August 23, 2026

Advertisement

Gopal has since disputed the validity of the community note. Self-described ‘race realists’, meanwhile, have freaked out over the initial comment. So what’s going on here?

Race

There are no doubt many who have no idea what Gopal is talking about nor what the community note is supposedly disputing. What it comes down to is the meaning of ‘race’.

The concept of ‘race’ is only applied to one species on this planet, and that’s human beings. The reason for this is that there’s no meaningful definition of ‘race’ (as opposed to terms like ‘species’ and ‘genus’). As the BBC reported in 2025:

When scientists unveiled the first draft of the Human Genome Project 25 years ago, it seemed to deliver the final word on some antiquated myths about race. It provided definitive evidence that racial groupings have no biological basis. In fact, there is more genetic variation within racial groups than between them. Race, it showed, is a social construct.

To clarify further, when we think of someone belonging to a ‘race’, we’re making assumptions based on skin colour and facial features. The thing is, skin colour and facial features don’t tell us anything about people besides what they look like. White skin is no indicator of fitness; black skin is no indicator of intelligence, and an eye with epicanthal folds is no indication of empathy. In other words, the signifiers of race don’t tell us anything interesting about biology, which is why race is not used as a biological distinction.

History

So – why is any of this important?

It’s important because there are those who claim that races are biologically distinct, and there are all manner of assumptions you can make about people based on their skin colour. These ‘race realists’ or ‘race scientists’ generally want to convince you that certain races are inferior – usually intellectually – and that other races are superior.

Ironically, these racial supremacists often look like this:

‘Race realist’ who launched Jason Arday hate campaign smears vigil

Explaining the origins of race science, the BBC note it was the Carl Linnaeus — the “father of modern biology” — who came up with the term. Linnaeus also created the terms ‘genus’ and ‘species’ which are still used today, and apply to all living beings. Linnaeus’s races included the following:

• Asiaticus – people with “yellow skin”, and straight black hair.
• Americanus – indigenous Americans, with “red skin” also with straight black hair.
• Africanus – “black skinned” people with tight curls in their hair.
• Europeaus – “white skinned” with blue eyes.

As the BBC added:

Even if this colour scheme were true, Linnaeus’ original descriptions only began with physical traits. What he included in later editions of Systemae Naturae, which became the basis for scientific racism, were portrayals of behaviours. Asiaticus were described as “haughty, greedy and ruled by opinions” while Americanus were labelled “stubborn, zealous, regulated by customs”. Africanus women were denoted as being “without shame” while both sexes were said to be “crafty, lazy, and governed by caprice”. He described Europaeus as “gentle, acute, inventive, governed by laws”.

By any definition in any age, these assertions are racist and entirely incorrect.

Advertisement

Retrograde

Giving you an idea of how the concept of biological race doesn’t hold up, this is one of the replies to Gopal:

The 100 fastest 10,000m runners were born here: https://t.co/S4lqcnuYU0 pic.twitter.com/n35k8efYML

— Adam Hibbert (@adhib) August 24, 2026

If race was a consistent indicator of other biological traits, the 100 fastest 10,000m runners would be evenly spread across the entire African continent – not tied to one corner of it. There are also several reasons why successful 10,000m runners come from the same region of Kenya — chief among them that the area is 8,000 feet above sea level, and high altitude training is ideal for long distance runners.

No one is arguing that it’s impossible for biological differences to manifest in distinct populations over time. This is why certain physical differences exist between ethnic groups after all. What scientists are saying is that these physical differences are no indicator of intelligence, fitness, or personality. And the people who claim otherwise are — as Gopal says — are the very definition of racist.

Featured image via the Canary

By Willem Moore

Source link

The Deauville Sports Images Festival has removed the work of a Palestinian photographer from Gaza; succumbing to pressure from the Israel lobby. The silencing of the people of Gaza continues unabated, it seems.

The truth must “offend”

The image they removed captures a football match in Gaza against the backdrop of the city’s apocalyptic cratered urban environment. Crumpled buildings and a haze of dust and smoke set the scene, contrasted against an astroturfed green football pitch. The photo was replaced by one showing European cycling.

The organisers hid behind the excuse of wanting to avoid “controversy or offend[ing] anyone”. They wouldn’t name those behind the pressure campaign.

Killing off Gaza

The image showed a February 2026 match between Gaza Sports Club and Egyptian team Al-Ahly. Israel has murdered around a thousand Palestinian sportspeople during the genocide since October 2023, including almost 600 footballers.

What is offensive is not showing the image and the reality behind it, particularly in a festival that boasts it offers different perspectives on sport.

Featured image via Jehad Alshrafi

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Source link

An Israeli military strike targeting a nearby building has destroyed a warehouse storing nutrition supplies intended for children, pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers in Gaza.

The strike happened overnight (24-25 August) in Deir Al Balah, central Gaza. The force of the explosion caused large sections of the building to collapse, including the roof and walls, completely burying supplies beneath the rubble.

The warehouse belongs to Ard El Insan (AEI), a local humanitarian organisation. It works in partnership with Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP) to provide nutritional support to women and children.

The warehouse contained nutritional supplements and supplies intended for malnourished children, pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers who are supported by around 60 medical points run by AEI and MAP.

The medical points support up to 100 women and children each day. AEI’s team confirmed that the explosion damaged the entire stock, rendering it unsuitable for human consumption.

Sahar Salem, AEI’s project coordinator, said:

Losing these quantities in their entirety is a major blow to our work and will undoubtedly affect our ability to reach the children and women who need these services, particularly given the conditions they continue to face in the aftermath of starvation.

Since the beginning of the genocide in Gaza, our work has never been easy. Two of our colleagues were killed and another was injured by Israeli military strikes. Every attack and interruption happens at a time when people are in desperate need of the services we provide.

Even with the ceasefire, conditions on the ground remain extremely challenging, and children and women still urgently need continued support. All we hope for is for conditions to become safer so that we can continue our work and reach those who need us. These children and women cannot wait.

Advertisement

Rowida Al-Sabbah, MAP’s nutrition programme lead, said:

When we talk about a warehouse being destroyed, we are not simply talking about a building or quantities of supplies being lost. We are talking about a service being disrupted, about nutritional supplements that were supposed to reach a child, a pregnant woman or a breastfeeding mother who relies on that support.

This is happening at a time when rates of malnutrition remain high, including among children aged five to 10, a group for whom we have seen increasing needs in recent months.

Unfortunately, in Gaza, even the simplest things we need to provide nutrition services are now vulnerable to being lost or disrupted.

Despite all these challenges, we remain determined to do everything we can to continue supporting children and mothers in these areas and to ensure that they do not lose access to a service they urgently need, particularly those who are most at risk.

Advertisement

Humanitarian workers, humanitarian facilities and the supplies that people depend on must be protected.

AEI’s team is currently assessing how to use supplies from other warehouses to ensure services can continue to serve those in need.

Malnutrition rampant in Gaza

The loss of these supplies comes at a time when nutritional needs in Gaza remain severe. A new UNICEF report this week has shown there are concerning rates of maternal and chronic malnutrition in Gaza and that humanitarian aid is vital to prevent further deterioration of people’s conditions.

More than 12% of children in Gaza have been assessed to be suffering from stunting and more than half of pregnant women suffer from severe anaemia driven by acute food insecurity and lack of basic nutrition.

Despite the so-called “ceasefire” agreement, Israeli military attacks in Gaza and forced displacement orders continue to intensify. Israel has killed more than 1,296 Palestinians since October 2025, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health.

In June 2026, the Independent UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israeli forces and authorities have continued to commit genocide, particularly through the targeting of Palestinian children.

MAP is calling for urgent action to ensure the ceasefire endures and becomes permanent. And it wants civilians protected in line with international humanitarian law.

Governments, including the UK, must maintain meaningful pressure on Israel to bring a permanent end to Israel’s genocide. This should include halting arms transfers and ensuring accountability for violations of international law.

Featured image supplied

By The Canary

Source link

Hannah Einbinder has thrown her support behind fellow actor Mark Ruffalo, after he was forced to deny allegations of antisemitism over his criticism of the alleged role that tech entrepreneur Larry Ellison’s Oracle played in the Israel-Gaza war.

Ruffalo has long been a vocal critic of the ongoing merger between the movie studios Warner Bros. and Paramount, and last week shared a clip to his Instagram account of former Oracle chief Safra Catz calling some of the company’s technology “profoundly scary” at the Israeli-American Council National Summit in 2024, specifically referencing the company’s tech in relation to the Israel-Gaza conflict.

Ruffalo also called the conflict a “genocide” that “was built on an apartheid system of oppression powered by Oracle”, the co-founder of which’s son, David Ellison, owns Paramount.

When Paramount responded to call the Marvel performer’s comments “antisemitic” – an accusation which he swiftly refuted – Ruffalo subsequently received the backing of Einbinder in an Instagram post.

Advertisement

“I’m so grateful that Mark Ruffalo drew a connection between the Ellisons providing military technology to Israel during a genocide and their unprecedented media takeover-and pointed out that this is a dangerous consolidation of power that could ultimately be used against us,” wrote Einbinder, who is Jewish, on Monday.

“The idea that he only said these things because the Ellisons are Jewish is ludicrous. Is it also antisemitic to point out that Safra Catz, the Oracle executive vice chair who boasted about the ‘profoundly scary technology’ provided to the IDF, also sits on Paramount’s board? Or that Larry Ellison has been buying favour with Trump by donating tens of millions to his political efforts for years? Or that he once offered Netanyahu a lucrative Oracle post?”

She continued: “This is criticism of RIGHT-WING technofeudalist oligarchs who are in the process of carrying out the largest media acquisition in history. Period end of story.

“People are not too stupid to see these obvious connections. If you want to make it about the Ellisons being Jewish, then you are the one being antisemitic.”

Advertisement

The Emmy winner added: “I’ll say it till I’m blue in the face: every time Zionists equate criticism of Israel, its genocide, or anyone who supports it to antisemitism, they rob the word of all of its meaning. For those of us who ACTUALLY care about Jewish safety, we want that word to mean something so that when Jews are actually in danger it’s taken seriously.

“And, as Mark has been saying for months, opposing this merger is also about fighting for the working class of Hollywood: the crews and other workers that we artists claim to care so much about, who could lose thousands of jobs if it goes through.”

Einbinder concluded: “All of us artists could stand to be more like Mark, willing to speak out for oppressed people everywhere, even when powerful people try to bully us into silence.

“Visibility is a responsibility. Those of us with a platform need to use our voices before speaking out is outlawed altogether.”

Advertisement

During an interview with HuffPost UK published over the weekend, Einbinder shared the importance of speaking out on issues close to her heart, including voicing her solidarity with Palestine in the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

“Unfortunately, I think we live in a culture that places a little too much – in fact, a lot too much – emphasis on celebrity,” she explained.

“And our voices are elevated – and people [pay more attention to] famous people than, frankly, people who deserve attention: academics and scientists and journalists and people who are screaming about the state of the world and not being heard.

“So, to me, it makes total and complete sense to try to work in messages that I think are important. I just think that there’s nothing more important than bringing awareness to the suffering in the world, and what we’re facing in America, and in the Middle East, and [globally] with the climate crisis.”

Einbinder added: “I really just hope that more people are vocal, because I see so many people with far more influence than I have, and I think of what they could do, and I think of the impact that it could have, and I just know that it would be so large and so appreciated by so many people.”

Advertisement

Ruffalo wrote on X over the weekend: “The accusation that I am antisemitic is appalling and fundamentally dishonest. Criticising the actions of the Israeli prime minister, a military technology contract or the executives who supply it is not the same as criticising Jewish people.

“This critical and necessary dialogue is then dishonestly framed as being anti-Israel. To be clear, my views come from my own political convictions and should never be interpreted as hostility toward Jewish people, for whom I have deep love and respect.”

Source link

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”6e665978-b313-461c-8ad8-494c1e830ad4″}).render(“6a8da26ee4b0c0b31a446c0d”);});

Source link

Source link