Connect with us

Politics

What Different Fart Smells (And Sensations) Can Tell You About Your Health

Published

on

What Different Fart Smells (And Sensations) Can Tell You About Your Health

Even if you won’t admit it to yourself, we all love the smell of our own farts. In fact, back in 2014, ScienceAlert revealed that we find our farts more appealing than the smell of others. However, do you ever find that your farts even disgust you?

Or that what you thought would be a subtle, silent fart is actually silent-but-violent?

Well, according to NHS Surgeon and health communicator Dr Karan Rajan, we could actually learn a lot about our health and what we’re missing in our diets just by how our farts smell and feel.

What your farts reveal about your health

Advertisement

Silent-but-deadly

In an Instagram post, Dr Rajan says: “If your farts are silent but deadly, you might not be eating enough fibre.”

If this sounds familiar, you’re not alone.

The British Heart Foundation advises: “In the UK, the government recommends adults eat 30g of fibre per day, but most of us fall short, averaging around 17g a day.”

Advertisement

Loud-but-odourless

Ever do an absolute arse trumpet of a fart, expecting to clear the room but actually, there’s no smell? Dr Rajan says this means that your gut bacteria have been “fermenting fibre”.

He explains: “When your gut bacteria have plenty of fibre, that’s what they eat first. Fermenting fibre makes carbon dioxide, hydrogen and methane and none of these gases smell.”

Warm or burning

Advertisement

All of this gassy talk had me wondering about warm or burning farts. These are usually experienced when feeling quite under the weather, so I wondered what caused the change-up.

Healthline explains: “Having less gas to pass may make toots seem hotter. That’s because when gas is expelled with a bit of force — that is, you have more to pass — it clears your rectum quickly. You don’t typically feel the air warm up around your anus.

“If you have less gas, however, the gas may move slower with less force. In that case, the air may linger right around your bum, heating up the skin slightly.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

God I love it when virtue-signalling goes wrong

Published

on

God I love it when virtue-signalling goes wrong

Don’t you love it when virtue-signalling goes wrong? When some progressive ponce gets so tangled in the weeds of woke jargon that they end up spouting pure shite? We’ve had not one but two such delicious moral implosions this past week, and even better they’ve involved two of the most insufferable women to ever draw breath. Buckle in.

First up was Miriam Margolyes, the Harry Potter actor turned chat-show parasite who never shuts the fuck up. She’s on my TV so often that I’ve seriously considered taking out a restraining order. She titillates the Radio 4 classes by saying ‘front bottom’ and recounting how she once wanked off a man in a bush in Edinburgh. Last week, finally, her ceaseless yapping landed her in hot water.

She was on This Morning, oozing smugness from every orifice, displaying her rectitude as usual. Put it away, ma’am! Everyone’s welcome in Britain, she was saying, regardless of their origins, yada yada. Then she turned to the host, poor old Andi Peters, who’s black. ‘What are you?’, she demanded. ‘You’re a mix, aren’t you?’, she said, no doubt causing mass wincing among the jobless hordes who watch this cursed show. Then came her killer question: ‘You’ve got a black daddy and a white mummy?’

Advertisement

Peters looked bamboozled, as well he might: he probably hasn’t been so crassly interrogated about his racial pedigree since the school playground. ‘Both my parents are black’, he awkwardly chuckled. But Margolyes wasn’t done. You’re not ‘deeply black’, she insisted. ‘You’re what I would call high yella.’ Jesus Christ, Miriam. Using a racial term described by the OED as ‘offensive’ and ‘outdated’ on daytime TV? Couldn’t you just have talked about your front bottom again?

My point, she said, is that ‘we welcome everybody’. Even high yellas! One envisions the producers whispering ‘Wrap this shit up’ in Andi’s ear lest Margolyes start prattling about mulattos. It could happen to any of us, I guess. One minute you’re breathlessly broadcasting your anti-racist credentials, the next you’re badgering a black man on live TV about his exact concentrations of melanin. Easy mistake. Margolyes hilariously made matters worse when she addressed the ‘race controversy’. I’m just ‘interested in how black people, fat people and cripples feel about who they are’, she said. Strewth. And what about spastics, Miriam?

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

Even among damp liberals who are usually tickled pink by Margolyes’ court-jester eccentricities, there’s been discomfort with her racial blather. Funny these folk weren’t likewise perturbed when she said ‘Hitler has won’ and turned Jews from ‘compassionate’ people into ‘vicious, genocidal’ warmongers. Oh sorry, I forgot: they don’t give a shit about Jews. Yet to my mind there’s a perverse logic to Margolyes’ televised racialism. It’s the bloody afterbirth of a cult of identity that instructs us not to ignore race but to see it.

A couple of generations ago, the virtuous thing was to approach individuals as just that – individuals, not proxies for their race. Now the ‘virtuous’ thing is to wang on about ‘white privilege’ and ‘black oppression’ and to treat everyone you meet as a bundle of pigment requiring either reprimand or pity. The end result of such cloying racial grandstanding is a foghorn celeb going on TV and basically saying: ‘You’re half black and half white and I DON’T CARE!’ Character, Miriam, not colour.

Advertisement

Next up was Stella Creasy, the Member of Parliament for Stella Creasy. Roll up, roll up and hear about how a ‘proud feminist’ ended up running cover for a regressive religious festival at which unholy women were segregated from men!

Yesterday, Creasy took to X, where she lives, to say what a hoot she was having at Walthamstow’s Milad Al Nabi march to celebrate Muhammad’s birthday. But eagle-eyed X users noticed something missing from her fawning, slack-jawed video clips. ‘Where are the women, Stella?’, asked Times columnist Jenni Russell.

Then the funniest thing happened. Ms Creasy posted a follow-up video of herself gurning in front of a tiny assembly of black-clad Muslim women. Some had their faces covered in the fashion of Islamic obscurantism. One pictures poor Stella meekly making her way through the mob of Islamo blokes, crying ‘Ladies? Ladies?’ in a desperate effort to locate the fairer sex amid the misogyny of it all. But it was too late to hide the truth: this preening self-styled feminist had whooped for a festival and a religion in which women are treated as second-class citizens, their sinful flesh cloaked, their blabbing mouths gagged.

Advertisement

This is the same Stella Creasy who protested against London’s blokes-only Garrick Club. As the Spectator quipped, at the Garrick ‘male-only membership was misogyny’, while at an Islamo-festival ‘male-only marching is multiculturalism’. Honestly, is there anything more tragic than white liberal women obsequiously rubbing shoulders with Islam, a religion that would happily put them in a black sack? Creasy bows to the religion of transgenderism, too. I hope she’s explained to her Muslim mates that you can have a schlong and be a woman and thus Friday prayers segregation is a transphobic obscenity that denies the fluidity of gender. I’m sure they’ll update their policies accordingly.

In her attempt to prove she’s not racist, Margolyes asked a black man how black he is. In her bid to prove she’s not ‘Islamophobic’ – and to keep winning Muslim votes – Creasy cheered a gathering that she would have damned as sexist in every other circumstance. That’s virtue-signalling for you. One minute you’re yapping about ‘justice’, the next you’re cheering the placing of rapists in women’s jails. One minute you’re saying racism stinks, the next you’re saying ‘high yella’ to a black man on TV. One minute you’re a feminist, the next you’re making excuses for a religious ideology that treats women like shit. If this is virtue, what the hell is vice?

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Politics Home | UK To Officially Recognise Israel’s Occupation Of West Bank As Unlawful

Published

on

UK To Officially Recognise Israel's Occupation Of West Bank As Unlawful
UK To Officially Recognise Israel's Occupation Of West Bank As Unlawful

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband announced the UK government’s “new approach” to Israel in the House of Commons on Tuesday. (Alamy


3 min read

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband told MPs the UK will treat Israel’s occupation of the West Bank as unlawful under international law, saying that the government will take a “new approach” to dealing with the state.

Advertisement

In a House of Commons statement on Tuesday, Miliband said there was a “deeply painful contrast” between the UK government’s commitment to a two-state solution in the Middle East, and “the reality on the ground in Gaza and the West Bank” as he announced a major reset in the UK’s relationship with Israel. 

The most significant elements of Miliband’s announcements included the UK government recognising that Israel’s occupation of the West Bank was unlawful; an import ban from illegal settlements in the West Bank; and a ban on arms licenses that “materially contribute” to Israel’s illegal occupation of the West Bank. 

Other announcements included sanctions against those those financing or building illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank; a ban on advertising illegal settlement properties; and further sanctions for individuals involved in promoting settler violence in the West Bank. 

Advertisement

The decision to end the trade of goods from Israeli settlements in the West Bank joins similiar action from around a dozen Western countries including France, Spain and Ireland. 

Miliband said it was the position of the British government that “there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank” and that it was being “perpetrated by settler terrorists”. He stopped short of calling Israel’s actions in Gaza a genocide, stating “we support legal processes to determine this”. 

Miliband, who Prime Minister Andy Burnham appointed Foreign Secretary when he entered No 10 in July, said was “no contradiction” between his support of an Israeli state, a Palestinian state, and his own Jewishness as the son of Holocaust survivors.

Advertisement

He added that the Labour government’s disagreement is with the Israeli government led by Benjamin Netanyahu, and not with the people of Israel. 

“My parents came here as Jewish refugees and found sanctuary and a country that stood up for the rule of law, freedom, and self-determination,” Miliband told MPs.

“Those are the values this government is standing up for today, and I truly believe that the vast majority of the British people, including in our communities with ties to the region, are united in their desire to see humanitarian suffering end and all sides commit to a durable peace process.

“And just as we want Israelis and Palestinians to live side by side, so… we have to live out those values in Britain.”

Advertisement

He added that there will never be “stability in the Middle East without a two-state solution”, and that if the UK fails to “stand up for the values that this country has long held and fought for, we lose credibility and influence in the world”. 

 

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Ed Miliband Accuses Israeli Settlers Of ‘Ethnic Cleansing’

Published

on

Ed Miliband Accuses Israeli Settlers Of 'Ethnic Cleansing'

Ed Miliband has accused the Israeli settlers in the West Bank of “ethnic cleansing” as he unveiled a fresh set of sanctions.

The foreign secretary has announced his plan to ban trade from Israeli settlements in the illegally occupied Palestinian territory as part of his attempt to “reset” relations with Israel.

He said the UK will “take action” against those who provide services including construction, finance and real-estate for settlement expansion.

He said he hoped to roll out the legislation in six to nine months.

Advertisement

It comes after Israel unveiled plans to extend developments in the West Bank, which would disrupt the idea of a Palestinian state.

Tensions in the West Bank have spiked in recent months as violent disputes have erupted between Israeli settlers and Palestinians.

Israel has built about 160 settlements housing 700,00 Jews since it first occupied the West Bank and East Jerusalem during the 1967 war.

Approximately 3.3 million Palestinians are estimated to live among them.

Advertisement

While making a statement to MPs in the Commons, Miliband noted that the government’s argument is “not with the people of Israel, with whom the UK has unshakeable bonds” but “with the conduct of its government.”

He said the Israeli settlements in the West Bank – illegal under international law – have expanded more rapidly under the last four years of this Israeli government than in the previous 20 years.

The cabinet minister continued: “Ethnic cleansing is defined by the UN as ‘a purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent and terror-inspiring means the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic areas’.

“The British government agrees that there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank – perpetrated by settler terrorists.

Advertisement

“And all too often, the Israeli government has turned a blind eye to this and worse, members of it have made statements and taken actions to support the forced displacement of Palestinians.”

France, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden have all joined the UK is slapping sanctions on Israeli settlers today.

In a joint statement, the countries confirmed this action follows steps already taken by Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands, Norway and Belgium.

Miliband also turned his attention to Gaza, where he said Britain supports the legal processes to determine if Israel has committed genocide.

Advertisement

He added that the UK will do “everything we can to provide all the humanitarian support possible to help the people of Gaza”.

“Our extension of the global human rights sanctions regime will enable us to target those responsible for violations of international humanitarian law, whether in Gaza or anywhere else in the world,” the foreign secretary said.

Miliband’s announcement has already put a strain on Britain’s relations with the US and with Israel.

The US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, accused the government of “discrimination against Jews”.

Advertisement

US president Donald Trump is yet to publicly respond to the sanctions package.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

What Your Penis Reveals About Your Health From Head To Toe

Published

on

What Your Penis Reveals About Your Health From Head To Toe

As a person with a penis, you would be forgiven for thinking everything “down there” is fine if your penis hasn’t shown any physical changes or been generally uncomfortable. However, according to Dr Babak Ashrafi, GP at Superdrug Online Doctor, you can actually tell a lot about your physical health just from examining your penis.

He shares: “Your penis is one of the few parts of the body that relies on healthy blood vessels, healthy nerves, balanced hormones and good psychological wellbeing all working together.

“If something changes, it doesn’t always mean there’s a serious problem, but it can sometimes be the body’s way of flagging that something else deserves attention.”

What a neat little system.

Advertisement

What your penis can teach you about your health

Erectile dysfunction

According to The Urology Foundation, erectile dysfunction (ED) affects around 4.3 million men in the UK and is very common in men over the age of 40.

“Many men think of erectile dysfunction as a condition in itself, but it’s often a symptom rather than the underlying cause,” says Dr Babak Ashrafi. “An erection relies on healthy blood vessels, nerves, hormones and psychological wellbeing all working together. If something is disrupting one of those systems, the penis can sometimes be one of the first places it becomes noticeable.”

Advertisement

Dr Ashrafi adds that persistent erectile dysfunction can sometimes be an early warning sign of wider health conditions, including high blood pressure, high cholesterol, cardiovascular disease and diabetes.

High blood pressure

Often referred to as a ‘silent killer’, high blood pressure unfortunately rarely causes obvious symptoms. However, it can damage blood vessels throughout the body over time. Dr Ashrafi says: “If blood vessels begin to narrow or lose their elasticity because of high blood pressure, some men may notice changes to their erections before they experience any other symptoms. That’s why persistent changes shouldn’t simply be put down to age.”

Diabetes

Advertisement

Diabetes impacts more than just blood sugar. It can also damage nerves and blood vessels which are essential for healthy sexual function.

Ashrafi urges: “For some men, changes in erections are one of the first things that prompts them to seek medical advice.

“If these changes are accompanied by increased thirst, frequent urination, blurred vision or unexplained fatigue, diabetes is one of the conditions we would want to rule out.”

Early diagnosis can also reduce the risk of complications affecting the heart, kidneys, eyes and nerves.

Advertisement

High cholesterol

High cholesterol often develops silently, but over time it can reduce blood flow by causing fatty deposits to build up inside arteries.

“Because the arteries supplying the penis are particularly narrow, they may be affected earlier than larger arteries elsewhere in the body,” says Dr Babak Ashrafi. “For some men, changes in erectile function can be an early clue that it’s time to have their cholesterol checked.”

Low testosterone

Advertisement

Changes aren’t always related to blood flow, Dr Ashrafi explains.

“If you’re experiencing a reduced sex drive alongside persistent tiredness, low mood, reduced muscle strength or fewer spontaneous erections, hormones could be playing a role,

“Low testosterone can affect both sexual desire and sexual function, so it’s important to look at the wider picture rather than focusing on one symptom alone.”

Insomnia

Advertisement

A poor night’s sleep could be affecting more than just your energy levels, particularly if it’s happening often.

“Sleep plays an important role in hormone production, cardiovascular health and sexual function,” says Dr Ashrafi.

“If someone notices changes in their erections alongside loud snoring, excessive daytime tiredness or poor quality sleep, it may be worth investigating whether an underlying sleep disorder could be contributing.”

Improving sleep can have benefits for overall health as well as sexual wellbeing.

Advertisement

If you are concerned about your health, speak to your GP.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Tom Jones Claims The Voice UK ‘Fired’ Him From Coach Role

Published

on

Tom Jones Claims The Voice UK 'Fired' Him From Coach Role

However, it was suggested that he would remain with the show albeit in a different role, with a show source claiming: “ITV absolutely loves working with Sir Tom. They are in talks with him and are hopeful he will return to the series.”

Sir Tom then shared his side of the story in a social media post on Tuesday afternoon.

“To be clear, I did not want to leave The Voice as I love the show and really appreciate the audience,” he insisted. “ITV made this decision – obviously a while ago, and I was told just recently.”

He claimed: “The reason given is because of a financial difficulty with insurance. They now say in the press they wanted to ‘refresh’ the show, and with a new coaching line-up there wouldn’t be a chair for me.

Advertisement

“They are offering a much-reduced role where I would make an appearance but without being actually involved from the start, and I’m not thrilled about that.

“So, the only thing I know right now, is that there’s never a good time to fire an 86-year-old who’s still pretty good at his job.”

HuffPost UK has contacted ITV for additional comment.

The Delilah singer was part of the original The Voice UK line-up, and was part of it for four seasons until he was dropped, and later reinstated when it made the jump from the BBC to ITV.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Danny Boyle’s Use Of AI In New Film Ink ‘Disappoints’ Fans

Published

on

Danny Boyle's Use Of AI In New Film Ink 'Disappoints' Fans

Oscar-winning filmmaker Danny Boyle has sparked a lot of conversation on social media after admitting that his new film Ink makes use of generative AI.

During a recent interview with Variety, the 28 Years Later director was asked for how he feels about the increasing use of artificial intelligence in the film industry, to which he responded: “It doesn’t really matter what I think about AI. It matters what 20-year-olds think about it, [that’s] the honest truth.

“My opinion of it is that it’s a very useful tool, in many ways, provided you use it respectfully, and provided you pay actors, if you’re going to replace them with some kind of AI embodiments or something like that – just like with any animation project or just as part of the VFX toolbox.”

He then shared that there’s “about 30 seconds” of AI-generated content in his new film, Ink, which he and his team used to “animate a couple of photographs”.

Advertisement

“Oh! And there are some [AI-generated] mice,” he added. “[AI is] very good for animals.

“I got in trouble with [the animal rights organisation] PETA – we had some chimps at the beginning of 28 Days Later, and they wrote to me and said, ‘you must never do that again’. And I haven’t.

“And ever since, I’ve tried to use, you know, [CGI] animals. But AI is very, very good at creating animals, and we’ve got some mice in this one that run around The Sun newsroom.”

Over the last few years, AI has become an increasingly polarising issue in the entertainment industry, as it has in many other fields, with the subject being a major factor in the Hollywood strikes of 2023.

Advertisement

As a result, as you might imagine, Danny’s comments have generated a lot of debate on social media.

In particular, many have pointed out that just days earlier, Danny had been vocal against the threat posed to AI within the journalism world, in which his new movie is set.

“The danger is that the tech giants and their AI will be able to replace journalism,” he told reporters at the Venice Film Festival last week. “They’ll be able to have an AI journalist who’s much more efficient, cheaper.

“Will that AI journalist speak truth to that power that’s created it? That’s going to be very tough and interesting.”

He continued: “Teachers are another one of those tentpoles that hold up our society, and teachers can be replaced as well by AI. It’s insane what we’re doing.

“Where’s the village that we all need? And within that village, there are truth tellers who aren’t popular sometimes because what they say is unpopular. I hope Ink throws up questions like that about the future, what we’re ploughing into.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The Inbetweeners 3 Teaser Released As Netflix Confirms Film Is In Production

Published

on

The stars of The Inbetweeners pictured during the show’s original run

Netflix has finally confirmed that the wheels are in motion on a new instalment of The Inbetweeners.

Rumours had been circulating for the past month that the cult Channel 4 comedy was being revived by the streaming giant, and on Monday morning, they confirmed their plans in a fitting fashion.

In a 40-second teaser, the four original cast members – Simon Bird, Joe Thomas, James Buckley and Blake Harrison – were seen clambering into the iconic yellow car from the original series, with Netflix announcing that a third movie is now “in production”.

Last year, a deal was struck between the production company Banijay UK and The Inbetweeners’ creators Damon Beesley and Iain Morris, which at the time was reported to have “paved the way for the return of the hit comedy title”.

Advertisement

The pair said that they were “incredibly excited” to be “plotting more adventures for our four favourite friends”.

Naturally, they then added: “Ooh friends…”

Both Damon and Iain have written and directed the next offering from The Inbetweeners, saying in a new statement: “It’s been super-fun hanging out with our friends again, and we’re going to work hard every week to ensure there are no problemos making this new film for humans.”

The stars of The Inbetweeners pictured during the show’s original run
The stars of The Inbetweeners pictured during the show’s original run

The Inbetweeners originally ran for three seasons between 2008 and 2010, centring around a group of misfit sixth formers navigating all the awkwardness that teenage life had to throw at them.

During its time on the air, it earned a loyal following and won numerous awards, including three British Comedy Awards and a National Television Award, as well as being nominated for a TV Bafta.

Advertisement

It also spawned two spin-off films, released in 2011 and 2014, both of which revolved around chaotic and cringe-worthy lads’ holidays.

The Inbetweeners and its two spin-off movies are currently streaming on Channel 4.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Capturing the essence of its subject: Gordon McKee reviews ‘Tony’

Published

on

A film which captures the essence of its subject: Gordon McKee reviews 'Tony'
A film which captures the essence of its subject: Gordon McKee reviews 'Tony'

Michael Jibrin as Tyrone, Dominic Sessa as Anthony Bourdain, Antonio Banderas as Ciro and Stavros Halkias as Dimitri | Image by: Seacia Pavao / © A24 / Courtesy Everett Collection / Alamy


4 min read

Less about the taste of the food than the warmth of the kitchen, ‘Tony’ succeeds in illuminating more about Anthony Bourdain’s character than any gastronomical analysis ever could

Advertisement

The concept of a celebrity chef is, when you peel the layers away from it, a bit strange. They have become a mainstay of our culture despite almost none of us having eaten a meal actually prepared by one.

These people exist in our public consciousness not so much because of their culinary skill (though clearly that is a prerequisite) but because a handful of them have become chroniclers of the human condition.

No chef better fits that description than Anthony Bourdain, the subject of Tony.

Advertisement

The film wisely avoids trying to grapple with Bourdain’s life story.

Instead, it focuses on a summer in which he matures from delinquent boyhood, finds a passion within him and moves from an aspiring writer to a trainee chef.

You might imagine therefore that your cinema ticket would admit you to watch a portrait depicting a love affair with food.To Tony’s credit, it doesn’t.

It isn’t until near the end of the film before you get the first full sight of a carefully prepared meal. More time is spent washing dishes than plating up.

Advertisement
Tony and Sal
Tony and Sal: Dominic Sessa and Leo Woodall | Image by: FlixPix / Alamy

The film shows a young Anthony Bourdain falling in love with the kitchen not because of the contents of the stove but the melting pot of personnel preparing it.

Community, the sense of human togetherness that food brings, runs through the film’s 106 minutes.

From the traditional family meal to the band of chefs dining on the day’s leftovers, Tony captures the ability of a meal to bring people together.

In doing so, it illuminates more about Anthony Bourdain than any gastronomical analysis ever could.

Advertisement

He was a man who thrived on interrogating the human spirit, something I discovered soon after I was elected, while preparing my maiden speech. Bourdain summarised my own city of Glasgow as the most bullshit-free place on earth, unapologetically working-class and attitude-free.

It is typical of his observations – spotting the character of the people, not the place.

Humanity is, of course, not all lobster soufflé and white wine.

The movie offers up more violence than viewers might expect from a chef’s biopic

Advertisement

In The New Yorker essay that shot him to fame, Bourdain observed the “powerful strain of criminality” in the restaurant business.

There is nothing more antithetical to community than crime, and Tony displays the tug of war between those opposite colours of humanity.

The movie offers up more violence than viewers might expect from a chef’s biopic and references Bourdain’s struggle with drug abuse through his relationship with the chef Sal, played by Leo Woodall.

Advertisement

Bourdain famously wrote in Kitchen Confidential that “there is no lying in the kitchen”, referring to a cook’s ability under pressure, but there is plenty of lying in Provincetown, the film’s setting.

Nancy Putkoski is portrayed well by Emilia Jones, although if I’m honest the love interest is the one part of the film that feels slightly flat. But that slightly inconsistent side does little to dampen the experience.

The idyllic setting of Cape Cod adds to the nostalgic feeling of an adolescent summer – the period when the adult you are going to become first begins to emerge.

Tony posterThat is why Tony works so well. It’s not a film about a young man discovering food but one about a young man discovering people: their camaraderie and cruelty; appetites and addictions; honesty and deceit.

In a way, it encapsulates the essence of a celebrity chef. Almost none of us have ever tasted anything cooked by Anthony Bourdain. That’s not why he captivated millions around the world.

Advertisement

We watched Bourdain because he understood the most interesting thing about a meal is usually not what is on the plate but the people sitting around the table. Tony understands that too.

Gordon McKee is Labour MP for Glasgow South

Tony

Directed by: Matt Johnson

Venue: General cinema release

 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Critics Rip Trump After He Revives His Most Dubious 9/11 Claim

Published

on

Trump also visited the New York Stock Exchange in lower Manhattan a week after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Donald Trump claimed he and his workers helped at ground zero the day after the 9/11 terrorist attacks ― a claim he’s made before, despite no evidence that he or his employees were doing so.

“I went down. I was building a building in New York and I had a lot of construction workers,” Trump told Fox News host Trey Gowdy. “And I went down there very shortly thereafter ― the following day, you couldn’t go down the same day, but like the following day, very very quickly afterwards ― and we worked long and hard.

“But it was just so terrible and so hopeless, it was so hopeless, such a terrible thing.”

Trump has made variations on this claim many times over the years, but there’s no evidence he worked at ground zero or provided hundreds of his own workers to the efforts there.

“Everyone who helped clear the rubble — and I was there, and I watched, and I helped a little bit,” he claimed in 2016.

In 2019, while speaking to first responders, he also recalled working at the scene.

“I was down there also, but I’m not considering myself a first responder,” he said. “But I was down there. I spent a lot of time down there with you.”

Advertisement

Trump did visit the site two days after the attack on September 13, but it’s not clear what, if anything, he did.

In an article published a day later, Newsday described Trump at the scene with “every hair in place and impeccably dressed in a black suit, pressed white shirt and red tie, walking into the plaza with his cellular phone to his ear.”

The reporter even picked up what he was saying into his phone: “No, no. The building’s gone.”

In an interview that same day with a German TV station a few blocks away, Trump claimed he had a “couple of hundred people” either at the scene or on their way.

Advertisement
Trump also visited the New York Stock Exchange in lower Manhattan a week after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Trump also visited the New York Stock Exchange in lower Manhattan a week after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Todd Maisel/NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images

He’s also shared a meme claiming he was there “with hundreds of workers that he paid out of his own pocket.”

But that’s never been corroborated, and those who were on the scene have doubts.

Richard Alles, a retired New York City Fire Department deputy chief, told Snopes he never saw Trump or Trump employees on the scene.

“This is the first I’m hearing of it,” Alles told the website in 2018. “There would have been no need for that. Between police, fire and the construction crews, we had it all covered.”

Advertisement

He said construction crews came from the trade unions, not Trump.

And that’s just one of the many unsubstantiated claims he’s made about 9/11 over the years.

He’s claimed he lost “hundreds” of friends that day, but never named any. Shortly after the towers fell, he bragged that he now owned the tallest building in lower Manhattan, which was both insensitive and untrue. He’s said he witnessed people jump from the Twin Towers from the windows in his apartment in Trump Tower, which was four miles away. And he has insisted ― falsely ― that he saw “thousands” of Muslims “cheering” the attacks in Jersey City, New Jersey.

Critics on X hit back at his latest claim that he brought workers to help at ground zero shortly after the attacks:

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Susan Sarandon Claims She Lost Film Work Due To Her Support For Palestine

Published

on

Susan Sarandon Claims She Lost Film Work Due To Her Support For Palestine

Susan Sarandon has alleged that she has missed out on multiple work opportunities due to her staunch support of Palestine.

Over the weekend, the Oscar winner took part in a Q&A at the Venice Film Festival, where she is promoting her new movie The Echo Chamber.

During the conversation, Susan – a long-time advocate for Palestine and its people amid the ongoing conflict in the Middle East – suggested that there’s been something of a sea change in recent times on this issue, particularly in the United States.

“I think that the narrative has completely changed in terms of historical relevance of Palestine and the ties of Zionists with America and our politics,” she claimed (as reported by The Guardian).

Advertisement

“That has been a major revelation for people. How much money the United States gives to Israel, nobody really understood that.”

However, she added that she’s “still had movies taken away recently” due to what she referred to as “agencies that are telling people not to hire me still”.

“But that’s the power structure,” Susan added. “I think within the people – certainly internationally – I feel welcome.”

Susan’s comments come less than two weeks after Mark Ruffalo was forced to deny what he described as “appalling” allegations of antisemitism against him, following his criticism of the proposed merger between Warner Bros. and Paramount. The Marvel star had pointed out the latter studio is owned by the family of Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, whose company has ties to the Israeli military.

Advertisement

“Criticising the actions of the Israeli prime minister, a military technology contract or the executives who supply it is not the same as criticising Jewish people,” he said.

More recently, George Clooney was also asked about the public furore during his own interview in Venice, insisting he is in favour of “Mark Ruffalo’s ability to speak freely”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025