Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Why does the first lady of Sierra Leone have a council flat in London?

Published

on

Why does the first lady of Sierra Leone have a council flat in London?

Politics

Team Trump Stumps Against Massie

Published

on

Team Trump Stumps Against Massie

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”89b72e0d-e555-4664-bd4c-d2101580409e”}).render(“6a0c74d4e4b0d1a142e1414f”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Emma Willis, Josh Widdicombe And Johannes Radebe Are New Strictly Hosts

Published

on

Emma Willis, Josh Widdicombe And Johannes Radebe Are New Strictly Hosts

The worst-kept secret in showbiz is finally out: Strictly Come Dancing finally has its new hosts.

On Tuesday, the BBC announced in an Instagram post that Emma Willis, Josh Widdicombe and Johannes Radebe would be stepping into the ballroom as the new hosts of Strictly when the show returns to our screens later this year.

Emma said: “It’s no secret that I’m a huge fan of Strictly – I’ve cheered and danced along from my sofa for years – so to be stepping into the Strictly ballroom is something I can’t quite comprehend.”

“It’s impossible to fill the shoes that Tess and Claudia have left behind – two wonderful, iconic women who have been the beating heart of Strictly for so long,” she continued. “I can only hope that we are able to help to steer the ship as beautifully as they have, into this new chapter.

Advertisement

“I can’t wait to spend my weekends with Josh and Jojo, the incredible dancers and the judges. Fingers crossed for a 10 from them!”

Johannes also enthused: “To be returning to Strictly Come Dancing in this new role is beyond anything I ever imagined. This show has always stood for joy, heart, and togetherness, and I feel deeply honoured to now help carry that magic forward.

“To do it alongside the formidable Emma Willis and the utterly brilliant Josh Widdicombe makes it even more special. I’m ready-sequins, nerves, and all… please bear with me.”

Referencing his brief stint in the ballroom two years ago, Josh said: ”“Dancing the Charleston dressed as a penguin for the 2024 Christmas Special of Strictly remains my career high point, so I am giddy with excitement, honoured and a little overawed to be given the chance to step into the biggest shoes in television.”

Advertisement

He added: “I adore Emma and Jojo and can’t wait to spend my weekends with them. I’ll dust off the penguin costume.”

During last year’s series of Strictly, long-term hosts Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman announced they’d both be stepping down as its presenters at the end of the season.

In the months since, there has been widespread speculation in the media about who would be replacing the pair, with The Sun reporting in mid-May that Emma, Josh and Johannes would make up the new presenting team, now confirmed to be the case.

Before her exit in 2025, Tess had been the host of Strictly since it launched in 2004, first co-presenting with Sir Bruce Forsyth and later with Claudia, who took over as its permanent full-time host in 2014.

Advertisement

Notably, this marked the first time in history that a presenting team made up of two women had fronted a live primetime show together.

Tess said last year: “This isn’t a goodbye to glitter, sequins, or Saturday night sparkle (I could never say goodbye to those!). Strictly will forever hold a special place in my heart – but it does feel like the right time to hand over the reins.”

Claudia also issued her own statement, in which she remarked: “Strictly is a magical, glittery, fake-tanned train and it’s been a privilege to be a tiny part of it. The extraordinary talent of the dancers, the band, the hair and makeup and costume teams, the unbelievable production crew and creatives – all utterly amazing.

“I’ve always believed it’s best to leave a party before you’re fully ready to go and I know the new hosts will be magnificent, I look forward to watching them take Strictly to new heights.

Advertisement

“As for Tess – I’m so, so lucky I got to stand next to you. You’re funny, kind, whip smart and a true friend and I love you.”

In addition to its shiny new hosts, it seems the upcoming series of Strictly Come Dancing is going to look markedly different, with a slew of the show’s resident professional dancers confirming they will not be back on the show in 2026.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Mike Newton: The markets will force Labour back into line, or the IMF will

Published

on

Mike Newton was Conservative parliamentary candidate for Wolverhampton West, and worked for the Bank of England during his career in the financial markets. 

My plan for Saturday afternoon was to lounge on the sofa with our bulldog Albert and watch Celtic and Hearts slug it out, but it was interrupted by a call from a distinguished central banker. He has been a guiding force behind his own country’s financial stability for decades and not a worrier for its own sake. But he was seriously concerned about developments in the gilt and sterling markets.   

On Friday, as markets woke up to the full gravity of the political crisis and a potential Leftist Burnham government, the benchmark ten-year gilt increased by 18bp to its highest level since 2007. The pound was hammered versus every other currency.   

‘What is the right price for gilts now?’ my caller asked. That is a very good question, and the problem for Labour is that no one in the markets seems to really know the answer.   

Advertisement

The implications of that are extremely serious. The post-1970s consensus on fiscal stability has completely broken down and no one knows what is coming next other than much higher volatility. 

The foundations are in very poor shape. What is known professionally as the UK’s ‘fiscal metrics’ (its capability to issue and pay debt) have moved adversely for some time now.   

These include factors such as sovereign debt to GDP ratio (93 per cent of GDP), economic growth (1.4 per cent in 2025 dropping to 0.6 per cent in the first quarter) and the highest weighted average debt maturity in the G7 (fourteen years), which effectively means that when bond markets come under pressure, the UK is hit harder than anywhere else.   

It is also worth noting that 25 per cent of total outstanding debt is linked to inflation (if inflation moves higher this debt becomes more expensive to service). Again, this is the highest in the G7. 

Advertisement

Perhaps none of this would matter if Labour was a centrist government committed to fiscal responsibility, and allowing the private sector to get in with the job of creating wealth and employment. It would also matter a lot less if inflation was low and stable.   

Labour’s policies on employment, energy and regulation have put a structural premium on UK inflation at a time when it is going up globally. The markets have also greatly reduced confidence in the Bank of England to control inflation.   

The value of the pound is perhaps a bit less important than the situation in gilts, but the two are linked as a collapse in the pound would have very serious implications for the cost of borrowing, given its impact on inflation and the value of gilts for foreign investors who ultimately need to repatriate profits (or losses) into their home currency. 

The pound has now started to sell off as global investors internalise the seriousness of the situation, and the implications of the closure of the North Sea to new drilling as announced in the King’s Speech. Sterling has now become a ‘reverse petrocurrency’ at a time when it has never been more important to be one.   

Advertisement

So what happens next? Well markets never travel in a straight line, but the broad direction looks set: higher gilt yields and a weaker pound. But are we heading for a real crisis or just volatility? 

I think crisis: and I sense we are in one now. Labour is going to lurch to the left whatever happens, and Burnham’s lack of respect for the bond market is being imitated now by Streeting, and of course Miliband and Rayner are already fully signed up members of that club.   

Rather than arguing why gilts should yield 6 or 7 per cent, I think it is now more of a case of saying ‘why shouldn’t they? The burden of proof has shifted. 

Burnham’s plans to have a separate class of gilt for defence, infrastructure and the NHS is particularly insane, as the idea that different types of expenditure can be ringfenced has been proven over the years to be a complete non-starter. The markets set a price for debt based on how much there is, not what the proceeds are used for.   

Advertisement

It is frightening ignorance. If it was a workable fix, believe me it would already be done by every government in the world. 

There is no handbrake from Labour’s MPs or grandees for any of this. When Liz Truss made her mistakes, the Tory machine stopped her. The Labour Party is the other way round on this. It actively wants the mistakes to be made! 

Labour blowing up the gilt market will go one of two ways: interest rates on gilts rising to such highs that new issuance becomes so expensive it is unsustainable and reverses course, or it runs the car off the road and must ask for an IMF loan.   

The latter would of course come with very stringent conditions, and given that the US effectively runs the IMF, the terms that the Trump Administration would offer a Socialist Britain would be eyewatering. It might even be the case that the UK Treasury instead asks for help from the European Central Bank and tried to peg sterling to the Euro, which would suit the Rejoiner motivations of Labour’s elite very nicely. 

Advertisement

As Conservatives, we need to have a stringent alternative, and that is to structurally stabilise the public finances through a smaller state. I believe philosophically that government exists primarily to facilitate individual opportunity, and the state should not, and cannot, be involved in our lives to the extent it is. And now it cannot be afforded either.   

Andrew Griffith MP wrote here last week that ‘the solution has to be a Conservative one…built on the hard truth that no government has run a fiscal surplus since 2001.’   

Andrew is dead right. In addition to a radical re-examination of what the state pays for, there needs to be very serious consideration of the introduction of something like the German debt brake (die Schuldenbremse) through legislation, which limits the government’s ability to take unnecessary risks with the public’s money.   

While we continue to rebuild trust under Kemi, we should be mindful that we are going to have to provide clear and hard headed solutions for the problems Labour has created, and the solvency of the country unfortunately looks to be top on the to-do list. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Katie Price Blasts Critics Branding Husband Going Missing A ‘Publicity Stunt’

Published

on

Katie Price Blasts Critics Branding Husband Going Missing A 'Publicity Stunt'

Katie Price has issued an update after sharing that her husband is “missing”.

The reality star announced earlier this year that she had married the Dubai-based entrepreneur Lee Andrews around a week after meeting him in real life, having already struck up a relationship on social media.

Last week, Lee was due to fly to the UK to join Katie for a joint appearance on Good Morning Britain, though he ultimately didn’t turn up.

Over the weekend, the Celebrity Big Brother winner shared a video on YouTube claiming that Lee had been “missing” in Dubai for the last three days, his location services had been switched off his phone and that when they’d last spoken via video-chat, he was in the back of a van wearing a hood with his hands bound.

Advertisement

Katie has since posted another video onto her YouTube channel, in which she criticised those who have made light of the story, and questioned whether it may even have been a publicity stunt.

“This is a really difficult time for me at the moment,” she began. “It’s been five days now since I’ve heard anything from Lee. None of his family have [heard] anything from Lee. His dad is out is Dubai, he’s heard nothing, and the rest of his family is in the UK, and obviously [so am I].

“We have reported him to the British embassy as a missing person, he’s been reported in Dubai as a missing person, I just don’t know what to say.”

Advertisement

Disclosing that her “anxiety levels are sky high”, Katie continued: “I know there’s going to be stories coming out now because it’s a hot topic. But, at the end of the day, guys, I have feelings – and people disrespect that. It’s really not nice for me to be going through all of this, at all.”

“I am only human,” she noted. “I am a tough girl, I’m a survivor, but I’ve never been in a situation like this – I don’t think many people have been in a situation like this where all of a sudden the last message you get [is] a FaceTime from your husband in the back of a dirty old van.”

Responding to “TikToks”, “Instagrams”, “media speculation” and “lots of things flying about” with regards to her husband’s whereabouts, she added: “What everyone has to remember, as much as everyone’s trying to take the piss out of everything and speculate this and speculate that, this isn’t a game. This is real life. This is a serious situation for me.

“So, everyone trying to speculate, take the piss, make jokes, just think of other people’s feelings here.”

Advertisement

“This isn’t a ‘scandal’, this is something that’s really happening, and there are real feelings involved here,” she insisted, before stating: “I want to make it clear, again, everyone. This is not a publicity stunt. This is real. And anyone who thinks that I’m part of this is disgusting.”

Katie concluded by urging anyone with information to “come to me, or come to the newspapers, and we can find him”.

In her previous video, Katie expressed concern that Lee may have been kidnapped or held ransom, but clarified in her latest update that if that were the case, she’d not received any ransom note.

Katie and Lee’s first wedding service took place in Dubai in January, with the pair formally registering their marriage the following month.

Advertisement

The former glamour model has now been married four times, first to pop singer Peter Andre, who she met while they were both competing on I’m A Celebrity in the early 2000s, and with whom she shares two grown-up children, Junior and Princess.

Katie was then married to ex-cage fighter Alex Reid for one year, and builder and former stripper Kieran Hayler for eight years. Kieran is the father of Katie’s youngest son and daughter, Jett and Bunny, and she also has a grown-up son, Harvey, from a past relationship with footballer Dwight Yorke.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Government Accused Of ‘Cover-Up’ Over Redactions In Mandelson Files

Published

on

Government Accused Of 'Cover-Up' Over Redactions In Mandelson Files

The government has been accused of a “cover-up” after fighting to keep some details of its files on Peter Mandelson redacted.

The second batch of files related to the vetting, hiring and subsequent firing of the ex-ambassador to the US are due to be released in June.

The former Labour peer was sacked in September when the depth of his friendship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein was uncovered.

But questions over how – and why – he got the job in the first place remain, as his Epstein association was already in the public domain when he was hired.

Advertisement

The government has also been scrutinised after it emerged Mandelson failed security vetting but still got the job.

The government has been forced to publish its internal documents around the decision to hire Mandelson by the Conservatives using a parliamentary procedure called a Humble Address.

The Intelligence and Security Committee of MPs is overseeing the documents’ release and has raised concerns over the “broad” redactions within the files.

The ISC has tabled an Urgent Question – a debate – in the Commons on Tuesday to suggest ministers have been unfairly holding back information and are not abiding by the terms of the Humble Address.

Advertisement

The Tories’ shadow policy renewal minister Neil O’Brien said the ISC’s concerns are “an extremely serious matter that completely undermines what this House agrees”.

“There may be legitimate reasons the government doesn’t want to place certain things in the public domain, but if the Humble Address motion doesn’t allow for redactions on those grounds, the government can’t just unilaterally decide to ignore the will of this House.”

He then accused Labour MPs of voting for “a cover-up when they voted against referring the prime minister to the privileges committee” over Starmer’s past comments on Mandelson.

“This House and the people of this country deserve better than yet another cover-up,” O’Brien claimed.

Advertisement

But cabinet office minister Darren Jones said the government “takes these matter very seriously”.

He told the Commons: “I would not for one instance countenance the idea that there is, as loud as you’d like to shout it, a cover-up.

“If there was any suggestion of the cover-up, I would not be standing at this despatch box, I would resign.”

Jones, the chief secretary to the prime minister, also confirmed the next tranche of documents’ release date had been pushed back from this Thursday until June.

Advertisement

He said that would be “inappropriate” to release the lengthy publication as MPs are set to rise for recess on the same day.

“Given the House is due to rise on Thursday, and given the length of the publication, the second tranche will now be published after the Whitsun recess to give the House sufficient time to review the material and to be able to ask me and the government questions,” the minister told MPs.

“It could have been published this Thursday, but I felt that the House would deem that to be inappropriate, given it will be such a significant publication.”

“This will be the largest publication, other than the Chilcot Inquiry report, ever published to the House,” he said, referring to the official probe into the UK’s involvement in the Iraq war which covered almost a decade of decision-making.

Advertisement

The first batch of documents, released in March, showed Keir Starmer was give plenty of warnings not to make Mandelson the UK’s ambassador to Washington, but went ahead with it anyway.

The files showed the disgraced peer also wanted a pay-off of more than half a million pounds for the job he was sacked from, though he ended up with £75,000.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Waking Up At Night? Sleep Experts Explain How Many Times It’s Normal To Be Awake

Published

on

Waking Up At Night? Sleep Experts Explain How Many Times It's Normal To Be Awake

Did you know that getting up at night to pee has a name (nocturia)?

Not only that, but it turns out there are “normal” amounts of midnight number ones to expect by age, too. Younger people usually get up to urinate once a night, while those in their 90s may still be in the “usual” range if they make four trips in the wee hours.

But not all nocturnal disruptions are to do with the loo. According to a 2010 study, just under a third of us wake up in the middle of the night at least three times a week; while older research found 23% of us get up a minimum of once a night.

And according to experts at the Sleep Foundation, those numbers might be affected by age, as after 60, they say, our circadian rhythm changes.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

UK Gardeners Told To Place Common Household Item On Their Lawns

Published

on

Though it was a good year for strawberry growers, 2025′s weird weather gave gardeners much to reconsider.

Backyard-proud Brits have been asked to check for footprints on their lawn, place a pan of water on their grass, move their potted plants, and even shuffle some stones around to ensure their greenery is properly hydrated.

But speaking to HuffPost UK, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) points out that your garden isn’t just made up of plants.

Birds, whose population has been slashed by as much as 50% over the past 50 years, are just one member of a key ecosystem that helps our gardens to thrive (if you need any more motivation, they’re a natural pest control for slugs, chafer grubs, and other unwelcome visitors).

Advertisement

One way to help them in this dry spell involves placing an old washing-up bowl or sink in your garden or even balcony, the experts say.

It can create a “mini pond”

Katie Nethercoat, a member of RSPB’s Wildlife Team, says that the simple gesture can go further than you might think.

“Lack of rain, hardened ground and rising temperatures can all bring in challenges for our birds,” she says.

Advertisement

“Providing fresh, clean bathing and drinking water is a simple but hugely effective way to help wildlife, as well as leaving areas of damp ground and soil.”

That’s partly because slick mud is key for ground-feeding birds like blackbirds and dunnocks, who need to eat invertebrates like worms.

“Piles of twigs, leaves and branches in a corner of a garden help keep areas damp for invertebrates,” Nethercoat continues, “our summer visitors, the house martin, also rely heavily on mud to build their nests.

“By keeping an area of wet mud available to them, this can mean they are able to build but also restore nest sites. This also lowers the risk of their nests drying out and falling to the ground.”

Advertisement

One way to keep these all-important mud patches moist is by building a “mini pond,” the expert adds.

It can “seem like a huge task, but a mini-pond is a great addition to a garden or even a balcony.

“Using an old washing-up bowl or sink can provide valuable access for wildlife. If the edges are level with the ground, more creatures can get in and out.”

If the edges reach above ground, provide ramps with logs, bricks, or rocks.

Advertisement
Making a mini pond, completed pond, Potton lower school, Bedfordshire, England, March 2015

Nick CunardNick Cunard / NCSM Media / RSPB

Making a mini pond, completed pond, Potton lower school, Bedfordshire, England, March 2015

Birds are far from the only beneficiaries

Hedgehogs, frogs, and a wide range of other animals will be thankful for the mini oasis.

“Even a mini pond in a pot will benefit wildlife,” the Royal Horticultural Society says.

This is a key step as our wildlife is desperately struggling in the UK.

Advertisement

The RSPB have full instructions on building a mini-pond on their site.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Streeting only backed by 4% of members showing the public see he is bad for UK

Published

on

wes streeting

wes streeting

Wes Streeting had been the first to go public with his ambitious desire to be Labour leader in an upcoming battle to replace PM Keir Starmer. However, his confidenceor arrogance – about how worthy he is for the top job will likely take a significant hit as polls show only 4% of Labour members ranking him as their first choice for Labour leader. 

Despite the mainstream media portraying him as the ‘golden boy’ of the Labour Party, this measly 4% is hardly enough to give him a fighting chance against Burnham or Rayner.

This is hardly surprising, however, as we have reported multiple times – Wes Streeting is a snake who has been dismantling the NHS for private interests. As this polling indicates, people have finally seen through his duplicitous nonsense in the nick of time.

Advertisement

Streeting – 4% support is just humiliating

It is undeniable that this polling should destroy any hopes that Wes Streeting – and his billionaire donors – have about the likelihood of him ever becoming the UK’s PM. In fact, even the publicly despised Keir Starmer flounces Streeting with 32% of members behind him remaining in post. Moreover, Burnham appears to be the front runner with 48% – but still, nobody is managing to command a majority of support even within their own party.

So, why don’t we remind ourselves why Streeting should never be allowed anywhere near a decision-making position ever again.

He is a duplicitous snake who will say whatever the public want to hear to get in power – then he will sell that very same public out.

Advertisement

We wrote about how Streeting’s own words in 2023 to slam Rishi Sunak’s response to NHS strikes were exposed in their blatant hypocrisy with his own behaviour in post. Given he is throwing the word ‘progressive around’, this is a significant alarm bell for voters to pay attention to:

NHS GP Neena Jha has taken apart Wes Streeting with his own words from 2023 over an upcoming resident doctors strike. It’s yet another indication that Tory and Labour politicians merely cosplay as caring opposition until they themselves enter government. Then, they backtrack and carry on the same neoliberal agenda they previously criticised.

Adding:

In 2023, Streeting said:

“Now we know why Rishi Sunak refuses to negotiate with NHS staff. He wants the strikes to go ahead, so he can blame doctors and nurses for his failure.”

The thing is, the health secretary has now himself refused to negotiate on pay restoration for doctors. This prompted Jha to take down Streeting “by his own admission”, replacing Sunak’s name with his own:

Advertisement

“Now we know why Wes Streeting refuses to negotiate with NHS staff. He wants the strikes to go ahead, so he can blame doctors and nurses for his failure.”

It is the Labour continuation of austerity and privatisation that is failing the NHS – not doctors.

He is giving our data away to dangerous billionaires

Streeting is giving our data to Palantir: a murderous, billionaire-interested spy tech firm which makes no secret of its disdain for ordinary people. Despite his promises that he intends to fix the NHS, the reality is that he intends to make it work for billionaires – whilst ordinary people have no say in the use of their personal health data.

Speaking of the astronomical wealth accrued from contracts effectively just given to Palantir, we wrote:

Advertisement

The spy-tech firm won the NHS contract for £1 in 2020 which is now worth a lucrative £400 million for Thiel and co.

It is worth noting that this kind of wealth appreciation has become pretty commonplace for the world’s richest whilst ordinary people increasingly suffer.

As a result, calls are being made to rip up this contract to prevent the inevitable exploitation of data for the financial gain of billionaires.

Considering Palantir’s proven involvement in the genocide on Gaza, this really should not be a hard fight to win.

3. He is the establishment’s ‘pick’ which should underscore how little ‘change’ this corrupted politician could ever deliver.

Advertisement

Discussing Labour MP John McDonnell’s astute takedown of Streeting in which he theorised the whole bid is a revenge plot by Epstein-pal Mandelson and dodgy McSweeney, we wrote:

He’s alleged revenge by Starmer’s former handlers Morgan McSweeney and his mentor and child-rapist fan Peter Mandelson. Both men were sacked or resigned over the scandal of Starmer’s appointment of Mandelson as ambassador to the US. Starmer has tried desperately to distance himself from Mandelson – completely unsuccessfully – and McDonnell says they’re now collecting payback.

Finishing:

Whether McDonnell is right or wrong, Streeting in Number 10 would be just as appalling news for the many as Starmer has been. Has-been… – that seems very appropriate. If only both of them were ‘never-was’s.

Streeting is (at best) a continuation, but he could be even worse

The Labour-right know that progressive, socialist policies are the only way they can differentiate themselves from right-wing Starmer. They are also the only hope of repair to our crumbling state. As a result, we have seen Streeting label himself as ‘progressive’ and once again, attempt to hoodwink the masses.

However, his 4% polling signifies that members are waking up and will not be fooled again.

Advertisement

Nevertheless, the media clearly worship him and will push him down our throats regardless.

Therefore, it is crucial that we do not forget who this man truly is – before it is far too late to do anything about it.

Featured image via Getty Images/WPA Pool

By Maddison Wheeldon

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Death penalty law targeting Palestinians consolidates Israel’s apartheid system

Published

on

A protester against Israel's death penalty law holds a placard showing a noose crossed out

A protester against Israel's death penalty law holds a placard showing a noose crossed out

Israel’s death penalty law for Palestinian prisoners in the occupied West Bank has now gone into effect after an Israeli army commander signed a military order. It follows the 30 March vote in the Knesset. National security minister Itamar Ben Gvir’s far-right Otzma Yehudit party initiated the vote but it received overwhelming cross-party support.

Following the passing of the bill, the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians (ICJP) submitted a sanctions recommendation to the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office. It called for the sanction of sixty-two Israeli Knesset members responsible for passing and adopting the law.

This law consolidates more clearly than ever before the extent of Israel’s apartheid judicial system, whereby Palestinians can be sentenced to death and Israelis convicted of the same crime cannot.

It is an entrenchment of Israel’s genocidal policies that are prevalent not just in Gaza, but across the occupied Palestinian territory. Once again, Israel’s unchecked impunity after years of genocide has allowed it to continue to violate international norms.

Advertisement

The law means that there is now a mandatory death penalty for ‘terrorist acts’, that does not require judicial unanimity, with executions to be carried out by hanging within 90 days of confirmation by the Israeli Prison Service.

Individuals sentenced to death will be held in a separate facility with no visits except from authorised personnel, with legal consultations conducted only by video link. Harrowingly, many Israeli parliamentarians including Ben Gvir wore noose-shaped lapel badges during the campaign to get the bill passed, and celebrated with bottles of champagne in the Knesset.

Death penalty based on citizenship, not offence

This law only applies to military courts, which only deal with West Bank Palestinians, who are not Israeli citizens. This means the law will be used to kill Palestinians, but Israelis who commit terrorist acts would not be held to the same legal standards, and would not face the death penalty.

This is especially noteworthy, considering the current Israeli finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, was previously arrested on suspicion of attempting to blow up a highway in Israel with 700 litres of gasoline. Meanwhile, Ben Gvir himself has been convicted of supporting Israeli terrorist organisations and having a portrait of an Israeli terrorist in his office, Baruch Goldstein.

Advertisement

While some Western governments have expressed their ‘deep concern’ over the bill, the response remains perfunctory. Countries including the UK did not use diplomatic levers to influence Israel robustly and the result is an apartheid law of unimaginable bias and cruelty.

Jonathan Purcell, ICJP’s head of public affairs and communications, said:

Israel is a rogue, pariah state. We’ve been saying this for literally years now, but the more the UK government wrings its hands, the further Israel will entrench its apartheid and genocidal practices. We called on the UK government to sanction the Israeli lawmakers responsible for passing this death penalty law and yet they did nothing.

Now, a law exists where 100% of people killed will be Palestinian, mirroring apartheid South Africa where 95% of those killed were Black. It is very clear that the UK government and others standing idly by are on the wrong side of history.

Featured image via Erik Marmor / Getty Images

Advertisement

By The Canary

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Corporate parasites use socialist saviour myth to try blackmail Thames Water

Published

on

Thames Water logo in the background, sinking into the ocean. In the foreground is Andy Burnham looking upset and next to him is the Canary logo

Thames Water logo in the background, sinking into the ocean. In the foreground is Andy Burnham looking upset and next to him is the Canary logo

Corporate parasites are weaponing manufactured fear to try to force a bailout of Thames Water onto an even more weakened Labour government. Potential investors are claiming that Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham could, rightly, push to bring utilities into public ownership. The Guardian reported this corporate leak, and said:

.Potential investors fear Andy Burnham could push to bring utility companies into public ownership

The establishment media portraits Burnham as some kind of big socialist threat to private equity. But we know he’s not the saviour some people like to think he is as his political history tells an entirely different story.

Thames Water cesspit

A bunch of creditors led by US investment firm Elliott Management is negotiating a shitty takeover deal for the collapsing water company. Private investors want tens of millions in environment fines written off. They also demand a reduction in environmental infrastructure investment until 2023. Because of course these vultures do.

Corporate ghouls are now using the threat of possible Burnham leadership bid to scare prime minister Keir Starmer into signing the ridiculous deal. And let’s be honest, Starmer’s spine bends to corporations at the slightest bit of pressure.

Advertisement

These corporate parasites claim special administration would create unnecessary instability for the supply chain. In short, the public get the shitty end of the stick. But this panic is entirely artificial because Burnham is far from the socialist saviour that the mainstream media wants you to think.

Thames Water is suffocating under £17.6bn worth of debt which the company has accumulated since it was privatised. The company is drowning in debt, yet previous owners and capitalists have sucked billions out of it in dividends. Private shareholders got fat on massive payouts whilst leaving us to inherit a dried out husk and polluted waterways.

He’s not a saviour, he’s a very naughty boy

The media and capitalist parasites are trying to paint Burnham as some kind of ‘socialist saviour’ but nothing could be further from the truth. Canary author Willem Moore highlights the difficult yet ambitious path Burnham will have to travel in order to be selected for the upcoming Makerfield byelection. Once securely in his Westminster seat, Burnham can challenge Starmer for leadership of the Labour Party.

Advertisement

He has used the success of his public-owned Bee Network buses in Manchester to build a political case for wider nationalisation. On Saturday we publicly argued that the UK must put utilities back under stronger public control. It sounds like a dream, doesn’t it? But don’t believe everything you hear…

But, Burnham has already stated he will not pursue proportional representation, and has fallen short of calling for full re-nationalisation of our utilities. Yes, we would have stronger control over them, but they would not be entirely ours.

His own parliamentary voting record tells a story of soft-left politics that prioritises establishment compliance. And definitely not that of a radical overhaul the public so desperately needs. Burnham consistently voted for the Iraq war between 2002 and 2003. And of course, he then voted against investigations into the disastrous conflict.

Tellingly, in 2015, Burnham chose to abstain on the cruel Tory Welfare Reform Bill, which drove hundreds of thousands of people into poverty.

Advertisement

So, don’t believe the corporate fear-mongering you’re seeing in the mainstream media. Burnham may pay a good game publicly, but his voting record and actions show historically, he has always batted for the corporate team.

We, the public, need to reject corporate blackmail and the false promises of wannabe Labour leader Burnham. The UK needs real, full, collective ownership. We need a real leader who will tell these corporate parasites to get their teeth out of our utilities.

Featured image via the Canary

By Antifabot

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025