Politics
Zack Polanski shows how responsible leadership should be done
Zack Polanski joined Laura Kuensberg to discuss the war of aggression instigated by the US and Israel. An illegal war which has seen Iran’s Supreme Leader assassinated alongside his family. This comes in stark contrast to the shameful ignorance shown by other public figures in the UK with their reluctance to call out the flagrant breaches of international law on clear display.
Nevertheless, many have welcomed Polanski’s perspective supporting the suggestion that the Green Party leader is far more in tune with ordinary people across the UK than most of our elected MPs. Polanski made clear the woefully apparent cowardice shown by the British government. Akin to their ignorance of Israeli crimes, they refuse to stand up to Trump despite his and Netanyahu’s illegal military campaign. A war of aggression that has resulted in 148 schoolgirls murdered through western bombs being dropped on a primary school in Minab, a southern province in Iran.
The school reportedly sheltered 170 at the time, showing the deplorable lack of morality in mainstream media who have refused to discuss it. Whilst highlighting the sheer devastation being dealt by the West against Iranian civilians.
.@ZackPolanski: The US & Israel attack is illegal and unprovoked, the defence secretary & the govt won’t condemn it, we have a PM who is incapable of standing up to Trump, and the worry is that we’ll be pulled into another illegal war.
Spot on. pic.twitter.com/EGFSnu0v1s
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) March 1, 2026
How diplomacy should be done: with a spine
UK officials would be wise to watch Polanski’s interview with Kuenssberg. Specifically taking note of his principled stance and refusal to kowtow to the genocidal state Israel and thug-bully US. After all, this attack on Iran is illegal, unprovoked, and has directly afforded Iran the right to defend itself from attacks on its sovereign territory. It must not be forgotten that these attacks came — once again — as negotiations were ongoing, reaching agreement on issues that had never seen that progress before. Such as a commitment to stockpile limit of zero, making Iran’s capability of building nuclear bombs impossible.
Once again, this exposes the excuse of stopping Iran having a nuclear bomb as a load of hogwash. Instead, it appears to be constructed in a ‘deja-vu’ to Iraq to further the colonialist and imperialist agenda of Israel and the Epstein-compromised US President Trump.
Kuenssberg, like any loyal client journalist to the establishment, refused to acknowledge that retaliatory strikes are a legal right under international law. On the contrary, she firmly lays all blame on Iran for threats to military bases in the region. Both the victim and the aggressor apparently:
.@ZackPolanski says the PM should condemn the strikes by the US/Israel as illegal & unprovoked#bbclaurak: but what about Irans retaliatory strikes, you’re not calling on them to de-escalate
Doesn’t LK know what retaliation means? Of course she does. Shes just doing her job pic.twitter.com/EI4flhG3gT
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) March 1, 2026
Zack Polanski astutely exposed just how ridiculous that wilful ignorance is:
.@ZackPolanski: “Its absolutely outrageous that they can be at the negotiating table & then our PM puts out a statement that actually condemns Iran for a retaliatory attack as opposed to Israel & America that started the bombing in the first place”🎯 pic.twitter.com/4QnNTGaDN8
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) March 1, 2026
Zack Polanski highlighted the fact that there is only one country in the region who has nuclear bombs. Making clear who she works for, Kuenssberg defends Israel as the only ‘democracy’:
.@ZackPolanski: “There is only one [country] in that area with a nuclear weapon, and that’s Israel”#bbclaurak: “but there is also only one democracy..”
Kuenssberg is defending a genocidal apartheid state that denies millions of people under its control their basic civic rights pic.twitter.com/AXwO15fMMK
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) March 1, 2026
This shouldn’t really need to be pointed out by Polanski, but recollection seems short lived in the West and common sense is second to self interest:
.@ZackPolanski: “I do know that there’s no example in history where you’ve bombed people to democracy.. airstrikes for regime change has never led [to] an example where a country is better off afterwards” 🎯 pic.twitter.com/03CojFCHVw
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) March 1, 2026
Justice must be necessary, not optional
The illegal war on Iraq killing millions is widely condemned. In fact, it is now widely recognised as having been instigated based on fearmongering lies and manipulations from US President Bush. However, the very fact that no one has been held responsible has long been a stain on our international rules-based order.
For instance, war criminal Tony Blair is seemingly protected from accountability under international law in the International Criminal Court (ICC), having never answered for his crimes against humanity. Instead, he was championed to sit on Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ painfully exposing the sham that that is.
Our own Joe Glenton wrote last year on the interconnected realities between Iraq and Israel’s genocide on Gaza. It is highly likely that Iran will soon be joining this list of victimised, terrorised sovereign states that never seem to see accountability. Joe Glenton wrote:
Now imagine a world in which Tony Blair simply never got a platform to advance his grandiose, yet inevitably ridiculous takes?
And imagine a world where the core values of Blairism – embodied today in the Magic Bank Manager Keir Starmer – had been consigned to the dustbin of history.
Sounds alright, doesn’t it?
Well one of the reasons that world doesn’t exist is that nobody was ever remotely held to account over the Iraq War.
The legacy media is a part of this. We shouldn’t be surprised that an industry dominated by Russell Group-educated Professional Managerial Class (PMC) losers would help recondition figures who represent their own values and ambitions.
Glenton was bang on and the theory is ongoing. If war criminals weren’t protected by power, with the rule of law having teeth of its own, our leaders would feel more uncomfortable about their prior, current and ongoing complicity in US-Israeli aggressions.
Nevertheless, it’s clear western leaders are less bothered about silly objective issues of legality. Instead, they have long been far more interested in keeping the big orange paedo-pal in the US happy. Zarah Sultana gave a damning rebuke to Tory Tom Tugendhat, the former security minister:
Tom, it’s interesting that you present yourself as the sole defender of Iranian lives when your record says otherwise:
You sit on the advisory board of United Against Nuclear Iran, a lobby group that supports punitive sanctions that hurt ordinary Iranians and has backed calls… https://t.co/7HVKVmqmfY
— Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) March 1, 2026
Her damning takedown of Tugendhat reads in full:
Tom, it’s interesting that you present yourself as the sole defender of Iranian lives when your record says otherwise:
You sit on the advisory board of United Against Nuclear Iran, a lobby group that supports punitive sanctions that hurt ordinary Iranians and has backed calls for US military action against Iran.
You’ve been paid by pro-Israel networks like YPO United Mosaic.
You criticised the UN Security Council for condemning illegal Israeli settlement expansion.
You described your participation in the illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq, which resulted in the deaths of over a million Iraqis, as “the naughtiest thing I have ever done.”
You condemned the “betrayal” of Afghanistan when Western forces withdrew in 2021, yet consistently supported the interventionist policies that helped produce that disaster.
Your government wanted to deny Iranian refugees the right to claim asylum in the UK and ship them to Rwanda.
And I’m still looking for your condemnation of Israel’s targeted strike on a girls’ school that killed over 100 Iranian children.
When you mount an attack, you need someone to watch your back.
Healey makes clear that this is Britain’s role – guarding the rear, while Israel and America go on a killing spree.
We are actively participating in an illegal, regime-change war – yet again. https://t.co/q4KpNjjZdK
— Steve Howell (@FromSteveHowell) March 1, 2026
Journalist Richard Sanders also exposed this double standard in a post on X, highlighting the selective nature of western condemnation:
The killing of dozens of girls at a primary school in Iran is not on the front page of a single British newspaper.
A simple test – imagine the reaction if they were Israelis.https://t.co/jvdHrLEMlB
— Richard Sanders (@PulaRJS) March 1, 2026
Mark Curtis of Declassified UK applauded Polanski’s ‘principled position’ on foreign policy, before warning that the threat he poses to the establishment will face concerted efforts to sabotage him as a result:
Many of Polanski’s positions on UK foreign policy are decent/principled and therefore a threat to the UK oligarchy. He’ll obviously be increasingly subject to the same kind of media campaign that helped remove J.Corbyn in 2015-19. We must monitor and raise awareness of it. https://t.co/RrUhAkOyR7
— Mark Curtis (@markcurtis30) March 1, 2026
Zack Polanski — potential future Prime Minister?
The principle and courage on show from Polanski to speak truth to power and put the interests of the majority over the interests of the powerful is earning respect across the country. It seems where other MPs choose to earn the favour of the US President, Polanski prefers to put the British public first.
In contrast to Starmer and the government’s abysmal approval ratings and failure to ‘read the room’ amongst the electorate, Polanski’s consistent show of principle is now earning calls for him to be PM.
With the recent astounding and overwhelming victory of the Green Party in Gorton and Denton, this might just be a glimpse of the future:
The Prime Minister this country needs: https://t.co/EHsHKZpKRj
— Sharmen Rahman (@sharmen_r) March 1, 2026
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
BBC Expert Explains Impact Of Rising Oil Prices On Trump
Soaring oil prices caused by the war in Iran are “going to hurt Donald Trump politically”, according to a BBC expert.
Jo Floto, the broadcaster’s Middle East bureau, said that explained why the US president has announced controversial plans to blockade Iranian ports.
Trump sparked confusion on Sunday when he said the US Navy would stop all ships going in and out of the Strait of Hormuz.
The US military later clarified that while it will blockade of Iranian ports from 2pm on Monday UK time, it will “not impede” ships using the strait to get to or from other countries.
Global oil prices once again rose in response to Trump’s announcement.
On Radio 4′s Today programme, Jo Floto said that was putting further pressure on American household budgets.
He said: “Despite Donald Trump’s knowledge of his own oil production – America is the biggest oil producer, doesn’t need this oil from the Gulf – but the prices are set globally and they’re affecting the pumps in America and that is going to hurt Donald Trump politically.”
Meanwhile, the UK government has confirmed it will not help America carry out its blockade.
A spokesperson said: “We continue to support freedom of navigation and the opening of the Strait of Hormuz, which is urgently needed to support the global economy and the cost of living back home.
“The Strait of Hormuz must not be subject to tolling. We are urgently working with France and other partners to put together a wide coalition to protect freedom of navigation.”
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Viktor Orbans Election Loss Sparks JD Vance Mockery
Viktor Orban’s crushing defeat in the Hungarian elections has triggered online mockery of JD Vance.
In a highly-controversial move, the US vice-president travelled to Budapest last week to give his support to Orban, the pro-Russia, right-wing nationalist who had been his country’s prime minister for 16 years.
Confirming the Trump administration’s backing for Orban, Vance said he was there “to help him in this campaign cycle”.
However, Orban lost in a landslide to his pro-EU rival Peter Magyar when Hungarians went to the polls on Sunday.
Magyar had said the election was “a choice between East or West, propaganda or honest public discourse, corruption or clean public life”.
His victory was quickly welcomed by politicians across the EU, as well as by Keir Starmer.
Posting on X, the prime minister said: “Congratulations Peter Magyar on your election victory. This is an historic moment, not only for Hungary, but for European democracy. I look forward to working with you for the security and prosperity of both our countries.”
European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said: “Hungary has chosen Europe. Europe has always chosen Hungary. A country reclaims its European path. The Union grows stronger.”
Other social media users, including Lib Dem leader Ed Davey, were quick to point out that Magyar’s victory was also a humiliation for JD Vance.
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Critics Damn Trump After ‘Unhinged’ Late-Night Attack On Pope
Critics have condemned President Donald Trump after he attacked Pope Leo XIV in a Sunday night rant.
In a lengthy Truth Social post that ran more than 300 words, Trump slammed the pope for being “WEAK on Crime, and terrible for Foreign Policy.”
“I don’t want a Pope who criticizes the President of the United States because I’m doing exactly what I was elected, IN A LANDSLIDE, to do, setting Record Low Numbers in Crime, and creating the Greatest Stock Market in History.”
Trump also took credit for the Chicago-born pope’s election, claiming the College of Cardinals selected the first-ever American pontiff last year because “they thought that would be the best way to deal with President Donald J. Trump.”

AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson
He repeated his grievances a little later when he spoke to reporters as he returned to Washington from Miami on Sunday night.
“I don’t think he’s doing a very good job,” Trump said. “He likes crime, I guess.”
He also called the pontiff “a very liberal person” and “a man that doesn’t believe in stopping crime.”
“I’m not a fan of Pope Leo,” he added.
Trump’s attack came after the pope repeatedly called for peace amid the ongoing war with Iran.
He did so again on Saturday.
“Enough of the idolatry of self and money!” Leo said during an evening prayer service, according to The Associated Press. “Enough of the display of power! Enough of war!”
The pope did not mention Trump by name as he described the “delusion of omnipotence” as a threat to global stability, but the comments apparently triggered the president.
Trump’s critics fired back on X:
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
What are the Prospects for the LibDems
The elections on 7th May could turn out to be seismic in their political consequences. They’re a mix of parliamentary elections in both Scotland and Wales, as well as in local councils and mayoralties all over England. In Scotland the conventional wisdom is that the SNP will win with Reform UK pipping Labour into second place. In Wales, Labour is expected to lose power for the first time ever, with Reform UK pipping Labour into second place and Plaid Cymru topping the polls. In England the main speculation is how badly Labour will lose, and will there be a subsequent leadership crisis. Both Reform UK and the Greens are expected to make spectacular gains, the with Conservatives not only failing to make many gains, but losing yet more seats. The polls show the LibDems languishing, but they always outperform the polls in local elections, so they will make gains in both councillors and councils that they control.
Tomorrow night at 7pm, I have the LibDem leader Sir Ed Davey on the show for an hour long-phone-in. There could also be consequences for his leadership, if things don’t go to plan. Some of his MPs don’t see a strategy and complain that there is no strategy coming from the centre. He will point to the fact that they were all elected under his leadership. MPs never look back, though. They always look forward and their thoughts are dominated by the prospects of re-election. And the fact is, many of those who won their seats in the south and south-west know that many of them only won because Reform took so many votes away from the Conservatives, rather than because of any massive increase in the LibDem vote. Now in theory, history may repeat itself, but with our politics so fluid at the moment, LibDem MPs would rather have a positive offering to the electorate rather than repeat the stuntfest of 2024. Tune in tomorrow at 7!
Politics
another right-wing Zionist has been elected
Right-wing extremist – and antisemitic friend of Israel – Viktor Orbán has conceded the Hungarian general election. With two-thirds of the vote counted, his right-wing rival Péter Magyar is on course for what the BBC describes as a “landslide” victory.
Hungarian elections: two cheeks… etc etc
The sudden concession has thrown UK state-corporate media into a spin, with some announcing it and the landslide while others, at the time of writing, say it’s still being fought and is close:
As the careful reader will have noted, both men are right-wingers. Quite hard right-wingers. But while Orbán is EU-phobic, Magyar has promised closer ties with the union. However, Magyar is not expected to change Hungary’s defence of Israel against any stray EU anti-genocide measures in any significant way.
Great. Another rigged ‘two cheeks of the same arse’ result while Israel continues to slaughter and destabilise.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Politics Home | Ed Davey: Hillary Clinton Told Me To “Stand Up To Bullies” Like Reform UK

9 min read
Former US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton privately urged Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey to “stand up to bullies” like Reform UK during a recent visit to London.
In an interview with PoliticsHome ahead of the 7 May local elections, Davey revealed that he had a “long chat” with the former US secretary of state when she spoke at a business reception in the capital late last year.
“We talked about how we need to fight Reform in the way they need to fight Donald Trump, and she gave me some choice advice, which I’m not going to repeat because that would be unfair on her,” he said.
When pressed, he added: “She said you have to be very strong and stand up to bullies and don’t cave in and cosy up to them. She didn’t say she was criticising Keir Starmer, but I think the approach we [the Lib Dems] have taken, and the approach that someone like the Liberal Prime Minister of Canada, Mark Carney, has taken, is the sort of approach she will endorse.”
He described Clinton as “very friendly and very warm”: “You could tell that she realised that we had shared values.”
Davey sat down with PoliticsHome a month out from voters going to the polls for highly-anticipated elections in Scotland, Wales and council areas across England.
Ahead of those elections, the Lib Dems have sought to frame themselves as part of the broader pushback against the rise of the populist right, taking strong positions against Trump and his actions in Iran, and calling on King Charles and Queen Camilla’s planned visit to the US to be cancelled over the US president’s treatment of the UK.
Speaking at the party’s local election campaign launch in Birmingham on Friday, Davey accused Nigel Farage’s Reform of “importing the divisive, nasty politics of Donald Trump into the UK”, adding: “This does not sit well with British values.”
The Lib Dem leader said he hopes that the Democratic Party defeats the Republicans in the US midterm elections in November, and while he joked that his party was “pretty busy in the UK at the moment”, he said they do have a “good relationship with a lot of Democrats”.
“We’ve helped Democrat politicians in the past,” he said.
“They have a good relationship with our party. We had a good relationship with a few Republicans, but I’m afraid lots of Republicans from that great party have now backed the MAGA movement and now support Donald Trump and some of his nasty, divisive, damaging policies.”
As well as Canadian Prime Minister Carney, Davey praised the “strong leadership” of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who on Wednesday issued a thinly veiled swipe at the Trump administration by saying Spain “will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket”.
With Trump continuing to be a deeply unpopular figure in the UK, Davey hopes that his party’s opposition to the US president will boost Lib Dem prospects on 7 May.
Last month, The Spectator obtained internal plans revealing a belief among Lib Dem strategists that their position on the Iran war will pay dividends at those elections, with a memo reading: “For the first time since the Iraq war… we have a chance to turn a distinctive and principled Liberal Democrat position on foreign affairs into significant election gains.”
However, despite leading the Liberal Democrats to their best general election result two years ago, Davey is heading next month’s locals under pressure from restless Lib Dem MPs who complain that the party is drifting and failing to capitalise on the 2024 success.
The polls are the polls, but the elections are the elections
Most opinion polls show that the Lib Dems have hovered around 12 per cent of the national vote since the 2024 general election, with no significant increase.
Last month, PoliticsHome reported concern within the party that a handful of Lib Dem MPs could be tempted to join Zack Polanski’s surging Greens.
“I’m restless like they are… I share their restlessness,” Davey told PoliticsHome, while stressing that his MPs and the party “work really well together”.
However, in a bid to face down his critics, the Lib Dem leader pointed to his electoral record.
“The polls are the polls, but the elections are the elections,” he told PoliticsHome.
“Winning elections is what we’ve done under my leadership. If we make net gains in May, it will be the eighth year in a row we’ve made net gains, the sixth under my leadership. It’s never happened before. That’s a continual increase, year on year.
“This year we could well beat Labour and the Tories for the number of councillors we elect for the second year in a row, and it’s never happened previously.”
He insisted that the Lib Dems are “still the most united parliamentary party” despite recent negative briefings.
“Labour could have a leadership election after May, the Tories could. They’re certainly losing MPs to Reform, and then Reform is losing those MPs on the other side. We haven’t, we won’t, and we will work really well together. I am determined to lead us into the next election and show that we have the ideas for our country,” he said.
One complaint among uneasy Lib Dems is that the party currently lacks a clear identity and target audience, having spent recent years focusing its electoral strategy on former Conservative voters in the south of England.
According to Davey, the party now has an opportunity to pick up former Green supporters who care deeply about the environment but are not as left-wing as the party’s self-described eco-populist leader, Zack Polanski.
“You’re going to see a fracturing of the Green Party in the sense that there’s a lot of the former Greens before this Corbynista push, who were much more middle of the road,” he said.
“Their focus was on the environment… The stuff that they [the Greens] are now talking about, they don’t really buy… they don’t like what they’re seeing.”
The discussion heading into 7 May has been dominated by the rise of the Greens and Reform, and their threat to the historic two-party dominance of Labour and the Conservatives.
However, the Lib Dems are hopeful of making gains across the country next month, including in East and West Surrey, Hampshire, Portsmouth, and some areas in the north of England, such as Stockport and Newcastle.
Asked what distinct message the Lib Dems are offering to voters, Davey told PoliticsHome they were positioning themselves as “local champions” who will fix church roofs – a deliberate echo of Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, who mockingly described a Lib Dem “somebody who is good at fixing their church roof” last year.
At the campaign launch on Friday, PoliticsHome spoke to Lib Dem councillors and candidates who felt that while it was unlikely they – or any party – would win outright control of Birmingham Council, the Lib Dems could be left in a good position to play a “leading role” in the administration after the elections.
The question of who Davey would be prepared to work with could be one he faces increasingly in the future, as the fragmentation of UK politics into a multi-party system shows no signs of going away.
Davey was clear that his party has ruled out working with Reform, and the leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats, Alex Cole-Hamilton, has ruled out entering a coalition with the Scottish National Party (SNP).
However, the party has not ruled out a coalition with Labour, the Green Party, independent candidates, or Plaid Cymru in Wales. Jane Dodds, the leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats and the only Lib Dem member of the Senedd, said this week that the Lib Dems would only work with Plaid Cymru if they “confirm that they will not spend a penny of government money on independence”.
Asked whether his party might enter an agreement with the Welsh nationalist party, Davey said he had not spoken to Dodds about it yet.
“I’d be really surprised, given our opposition to independence,” he said.
“You would have to speak to Alex Cole-Hamilton and Jane Dodds, because they will run those negotiations. They’re devolved administrations.”
Liberal Democrat MP Roz Savage told The House magazine in March that the party “needs a plan” for a coalition scenario after the next general election, having been “badly burned” by their experience sharing power with David Cameron’s Conservatives.
Asked whether any resulting coalitions from the May elections could provide test cases for where Lib Dems could work with other parties after a general election, Davey said: “Good question, but I am very focused on the local elections and the next general election, maximising Liberal Democrat victories.”
The challenge for Davey and his party, however, is that the 7 May elections are so unpredictable that they are struggling to predict where they might make the strongest gains.
“It’s complicated, because you’ve got the two old parties’ votes collapsing,” the former cabinet minister said.
“Where we’re strong, we’re big beneficiaries of that, but then there’s Reform coming in… And so we’re finding it quite difficult to read the canvassing, because the Reform vote is a little bit shy.”
Davey suggested the Lib Dems could cause “a bit of a surprise” in Birmingham, pointing to the fact that his party are fielding an expanded list of 101 candidates in the city and describing local campaigners as having “really gone for it”.
In the bid for attention in an increasingly fragmented political landscape, Davey intends to continue carrying out publicity stunts for the cameras. Most recently, he was pictured playing chess with Hull City Council leader Mike Ross at the Hull campaign launch last week.
Davey – similarly to Chancellor Rachel Reeves – played chess competitively until he was about 12 years old, though he said he would “not put myself up as a great chess player” anymore.
“Playing the long game, that’s the key thing in chess,” he said.
“You play all your moves, you don’t get worried if you make a sacrifice here, you work out where you’re going to go.”
Politics
Why Bonnie Blue is good for feminism, with Zoe Strimpel
The post Why Bonnie Blue is good for feminism, with Zoe Strimpel appeared first on spiked.
Politics
Iran ‘s anti-Trump videos mark YouTube ban with new release
The YouTube platform has (again) removed the account of Explosive Media, the makers of Iran’s ‘Lego’-style and intensely viral propaganda videos mocking Donald Trump, Benjamin Netanyahu and their failures.
Explosive Media announced the ban on X:
The group’s accounts on X, UpScrolled, Instagram and other platforms are so far unaffected. Explosive Media marked the occasion by releasing a new video, Loser 2 — described as a ‘banger’ — mocking Trump’s endless lies, his loss to Iran in his and Israel’s illegal war and his guilt in the crimes of serial child-rapist and Israeli spy Jeffrey Epstein. It also directly refers to Trump being behind the ban:
Iranians just published the new very banger LEGO AI movie that Trump almost wants to put onto agreement list to stop them.
Do whatever you need to do but don’t let Trump watch this 😭🤣😂 pic.twitter.com/y66Mr7Yadk
— Furkan Gözükara (@FurkanGozukara) April 11, 2026
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Reform candidate exposed as a horny nincompoop
Reform — There’s a genre of horny older men who don’t seem to understand that the internet is a place others inhabit — a place where people can see what they’re up to. These men often use their actual faces as their profile pictures; probably because they lack the wherewithal to realise they could not do that.
Despite their real names and faces being visible, these men will pepper sex workers with messages like ‘very big boobs‘ and ‘Yes I would love to have some fun‘.
When you see these wretched individuals online, you think to yourself ‘what on Earth do these people do in the real world‘? In the case of Stephen Hammond, the answer is ‘run to be a Reform UK councillor‘:
Married man too, tut tut.
— Reform Party UK Exposed 🇬🇧 (@reformexposed) April 11, 2026
Reform — Aroused ignoramus
If you can’t open the images above, know that Hammond was replying to a woman in her underwear who was asking:
Does this help you love me more
Hammond responded:
Yes I would love to have some fun
He’s not having fun now, clearly, as he’s deleted his Threads account.
From that same account, Hammond recently posted:
Hi all friends and family, just a quick note to inform you that I am now running for Councillor with the Reform UK party at the Holmewood and Brierly ward in Bradford district, we will be out and about in the ward very soon, and looking to get Labour out of the Bradford Council so we can start putting the good, if you are in the Ward please look out for us we will be only to [sic] glad to listen to any problems and try to solve them the best we can.
Good god, Stephen, are they rationing full stops in Bradford? No wonder you want to get rid of Labour if they are!
Punctuation aside, the above post reveals that Hammond uses his “friends and family” account for horny posting.
This is not good.
As reprehensible as many UK politicians are, they do at least have the self-preservation instincts needed to indulge themselves behind closed doors.
We’re not sure we want to live in a country in which public services are run by people with zero common sense and minus zero impulse control.
It gets worse
The good people at Reform Party UK Exposed posted some of Hammond’s other posts:
You know a culture is thriving when your list of things to be proud of includes ‘speak our own language‘.
Not to tell these dipshits how to make their rancid memes, but they should probably replace ‘pork’ with ‘bacon’. English people have never made a big deal out of eating pork; they’re just saying this because they think it will upset Muslims.
Your culture isn’t doing well when you do things to upset others rather than to enrich your own spirit!
Hammond also believed this eyesore of a meme “keeps getting deleted from the internet”:
According to Hammond, “genocide” is when someone moves into your area and opens a shop.
Also, remember in the last meme when Hammond was proud to “speak English”? Well now he’s worrying about “FOREIGN HOARDS”.
You mean “FOREIGN HORDES”, dipshit.
Aren’t you a ‘learn the language or get out‘ guy?
Further proving Hammond can’t speak the language he’s proud to speak:
We’d stick to the pork and beer if we were you, Stephen.
Local erections
Hammond is far from the only unseemly candidate that Reform have lined up for the local elections:
We keep thinking Reform can’t top themselves, and yet every day the candidates just get worse and worse.
Featured image via Stephen Hammond
Politics
Trans violence is out of control
Jolyon Maugham’s Good Law Project has lodged a complaint with the Information Commissioner about the gender-critical organisation, Protect and Teach, accusing it of failing to disclose ‘who they are or how they’re handling people’s data’. ‘If a group won’t say who they are’, the Good Law Project asserts, ‘it raises a vital question: what are they trying to hide? If your views are so toxic you won’t put your name to them, then maybe you shouldn’t be saying them at all.’
True or not, these pettifogging legal gripes entirely miss the point. The fact is that campaigners are concealing their identities not because of the supposed ‘toxicity’ of their beliefs, but because they are concerned about their safety and that of their families. For gender-critical feminists, speaking in public has become a very dangerous business.
The first hints of the current wave of violence began last year. Following the landmark judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd vs The Scottish Ministers, in which the Supreme Court confirmed that ‘sex’ in the Equality Act refers to biological sex, the women behind the campaign reported being inundated with death threats and misogynistic abuse. They also described the damage their views had caused to their employment and business interests.
Trans activists soon turned their attention to officials. The then chairwoman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), Baroness Falkner, told parliament’s Women and Equalities Committee that she had been forced to cancel a meeting after police warned of a ‘serious risk’ of violence. Trans activists had made it harder for her staff to come to work in safety, she told MPs, adding: ‘The level of agitation that they can cause in terms of personal attacks, libellous attacks, defamation, where our family members are affected – our intimate family members have to think about how they’re going about to their place of work – has got to stop.’
You don’t even have to be a gender-critical feminist to risk the wrath of activists. Sally Dunsmore, the director of the Oxford Literary Festival, last year dared to programme a discussion between gender-critical writers Julie Bindel and Helen Joyce. Several guests, including an Oxford lecturer in English, pulled out, while other activists threatened Dunsmore directly, telling her she would be ‘put in a box and burnt’.
Now, those threats are taking on a more explicitly criminal and violent form. A militant trans-activist group known as Bash Back has issued a ‘direct action’ guide urging members to identify ‘transphobic’ targets – including MPs – and ensure they are ‘hit repeatedly until they desist’ from their ‘transphobic’ activities. The guide admits Bash Back’s campaigning would be ‘rarely legal’, and warns participants that they could face charges including criminal damage, possession of an offensive weapon and aggravated trespass. An equipment section lists items such as a hammer and advises activists to clean tools with alcohol or dispose of them after use in ‘unsurveilled residential bins’.
They’re not mucking around. Bash Back has already claimed responsibility for attacks on the constituency office of health secretary Wes Streeting, and for hacking the website of the Free Speech Union. It also targeted the offices of the EHRC last year, smashing windows and spraying the building with pink paint.
Despite Maugham’s supposed opposition to ‘toxic’ attitudes, his own response to Bash Back’s activities was favourable. He described this campaign of violence and intimidation as ‘the inevitable, and I would say legitimate’ response to a society whose ‘politics and media systematically dehumanise trans people’.
Maugham’s hypocrisy highlights what has become a familiar defence of trans activism. Allowing a gender-critical feminist to speak is cast as an act of both real and symbolic violence, where every dissenting utterance becomes an attack on vulnerable gender-confused children. Like Maugham, they claim that the clock’s already struck midnight, and there’s no time for the weary conventions of civility, tolerance or open debate.
On campus, where the sort of people Bash Back is now urging activists to target are very often to be found, the implications of this rhetoric have already been severe. At the Committee for Academic Freedom, we regularly deal with cases involving gender-critical academics who are reluctant to take their concerns public for fear of reprisals.
This is reinforced by the government-commissioned review of data, statistics and research on sex and gender, led by Professor Alice Sullivan and published in 2024. It recorded not merely isolated complaints, but also a broader chilling effect: gender-critical academics describe moderating how they frame arguments, avoiding open discussion, narrowing what they were prepared to teach or research, and hesitating to pursue work touching on biological sex for fear of complaints, ostracism, managerial disapproval or damage to their careers.
If direct threats of violence are now being added to this already hostile climate, the reluctance to attach one’s name to advocacy concerning the importance of biological sex – or to pursue research on that topic, organise conferences, supervise PhDs or teach on it at all – begins to look less like evasion and more like self-defence.
The Good Law Project is free to campaign as it wishes, but it should at least be honest about where the ‘toxic’ climate it bemoans is actually coming from.
Freddie Attenborough is director of research for the Committee for Academic Freedom.
-
Politics3 days agoUS brings back mandatory military draft registration
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Veronica Beard
-
Sports3 days agoMan United discover Nico Schlotterbeck transfer fee as defender reaches Dortmund agreement
-
Tech5 days agoHow Long Can You Drive With Expired Registration? What Florida Law Says
-
Politics16 hours agoWorld Cup exit makes Italy enter crisis mode
-
Crypto World4 days agoCanary Capital Files SEC Registration for PEPE ETF
-
Fashion7 days agoMassimo Dutti Offers Inspiration for Your Summer Mood Board
-
Business2 days agoTesla Model Y Tops China Auto Sales in March 2026 With 39,827 Registrations, Beating Cheaper EVs and Gas Cars
-
Fashion6 days agoLet’s Discuss: DEI in 2026
-
Crypto World5 days agoBitcoin recovers as US and Iran Agree a Ceasefire Deal
-
Politics3 days agoMalcolm In The Middle OG Turned Down ‘Buckets Of Money’ To Appear In Reboot
-
NewsBeat8 hours agoPep Guardiola and Gary Neville agree over Arsenal title problem that benefits Man City
-
Business3 days agoOpenAI Halts Stargate UK Data Centre Project Over Energy Costs and Copyright Row
-
Business2 days agoIreland Fuel Protests Enter Day 5 as Blockades Spark Shortages and Government Prepares Support Package
-
Tech7 days agoItalian court says Netflix must refund customers up to $576 over price hikes
-
Tech7 days agoHaier is betting big that your next TV purchase will be one of these
-
Tech7 days agoGamer Restores the Original PlayStation Portal From Two Decades Ago
-
Tech7 days agoThe Xiaomi 17 Ultra has some impressive add-ons that make snapping photos really fun
-
Tech7 days agoSamsung just gave up on its own Messages app
-
Tech7 days agoSave $130 on the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic: rotating bezel, sleep coaching, and running coach for $369

You must be logged in to post a comment Login