Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Sports

2026 NFL combine results: Measurements, 40 times, biggest takeaways

Published

on

sonny-styles.jpg
USATSI

INDIANAPOLIS — It’s Thursday of NFL combine week, which means prospect measurements and on-field workouts are officially underway. The schedule is as follows:

  • Thursday: EDGE, DL and LB
  • Friday: TE and DB
  • Saturday: QB, RB and WR
  • Sunday: OL

In the morning, players will log official measurements, including height, weight, wingspan, arm length and hand size. In the afternoon, they’ll participate in on-field testing — including the 40-yard dash, vertical and broad jumps and bench press — before wrapping up with positional drills inside Lucas Oil Stadium.

As in past years, not every prospect will participate. Indiana QB Fernando Mendoza, widely viewed as the No. 1 pick in the 2026 NFL Draft, has already said he won’t throw in Indianapolis, opting instead to do so at Indiana’s pro day on April 1. Miami EDGE Rueben Bain Jr. — the No. 2 prospect in CBS Sports draft analyst Mike Renner’s rankings – also won’t work out, per Todd McShay.

There has been some positive news on the participation front, however. The following top prospects are expected to compete in some capacity: Ohio State EDGE Arvell Reese (No. 3 in Renner’s rankings), Ohio State LB Sonny Styles (No. 10), Notre Dame RB Jeremiyah Love (No. 16) and Texas Tech EDGE David Bailey (No. 19).

From arm length to 40 times, we’ve got you covered with every official measurement and testing number as they come in from Indianapolis.

EDGE measurements

Player School Height Weight Hand Arm Wingspan
Rueben Bain Jr. Miami 6-2 ¼ 263 9⅛ 30⅞ 77⅜
Arvell Reese Ohio State 6-4 ⅛ 241 32½ 79½
David Bailey Texas Tech 6-3 ½ 251 10¼ 33⅝ 79⅝
Cashius Howell Texas A&M 6-2 ½ 253 30¼ 74¼
Akheem Mesidor Miami 6-3 259 10 32⅛ 78⅝
R Mason Thomas Oklahoma 6-2 ¼ 241 8⅞ 31⅝ 78⅛
T.J. Parker Clemson 6-3 ½ 263 33⅛ 79
Anthony Lucas USC 6-5 ½ 256 10¼ 33⅜
Malachi Lawrence UCF 6-4 253 33⅝
Gabe Jacas Illinois 6-4 260 10 33
Joshua Josephs Tennessee 6-3 242 10 34¼
Zion Young Missouri 6-6 262 33
Romello Height Texas Tech 6-3 239 32¼
Keyron Crawford Auburn 6-4 253 9 32
Derrick Moore Michigan 6-4 255 9⅛ 33⅜
Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State 6-6 256 10⅛ 33⅜
Nadame Tucker Western Michigan 6-2 247 9 31⅜
Tyreak Sapp Florida 6-2 273 32
Wesley Williams Duke 6-4 256 31⅞
Caden Curry Ohio State 6-3 257 9⅜ 30⅛
Quintayvious Hutchins Boston College 6-3 233 32⅝
Trey Moore Texas 6-2 243 10½ 31⅝
Vincent Anthony Jr. Duke 6-6 258 10 34⅛
Logan Fano Utah 6-5 257 9⅜ 31⅜
Max Llewellyn Iowa 6-6 258 9 32¼
George Gumbs Jr. Florida 6-4 245 9 33⅝
Patrick Payton LSU 6-5 260 10 33⅜
Aidan Hubbard Northwestern 6-4 ⅝ 260 9⅛ 32
Jack Pyburn LSU 6-4 258 10 30⅞
Marvin Jones Jr. Oklahoma 6-5 245 33⅛
Nyjalik Kelly UCF 6-5 256 10⅜ 35⅛
Mason Reiger Wisconsin 6-5 251 10⅜ 32⅝

EDGE measurement takeaways

Concerns

Advertisement
  • We knew Rueben Bain Jr.’s arms were going to measure short, but his 30⅞-inch arms rank as the fourth-shortest among edge rushers since 1999, per MockDraftable. His 77⅜-inch wingspan isn’t ideal, either; only 19 edge rushers in the MockDraftable database (since 1999) have measured shorter. Bain will still be a first-round pick — likely in the top 10 — but teams with strict length thresholds could be wary of those numbers.
  • Cashius Howell, Mike Renner’s No. 24 prospect in this class, has even shorter arms than Bain at 30¼ inches — the shortest of any edge rusher since 1999, per MockDraftable. However, the reigning SEC Defensive Player of the Year doesn’t believe his historically short arms will prevent him from being productive in the NFL. “Those are just the cards that I’ve been dealt,” Howell said during Wednesday’s podium session. “I’m going to do everything in my power to perfect my technique and perfect my craft in whatever way possible.”


EDGE testing numbers

Name School 40-yard dash 10-yard split Vertical (in) Broad (in) 3-cone Shuttle Bench (reps)
Rueben Bain Jr. Miami (FL)
Arvell Reese Ohio State
David Bailey Texas Tech
Cashius Howell Texas A&M
Akheem Mesidor Miami (FL)
R Mason Thomas Oklahoma
T.J. Parker Clemson
Anthony Lucas USC
Malachi Lawrence UCF
Gabe Jacas Illinois
Joshua Josephs Tennessee
Zion Young Missouri
Romello Height Texas Tech
Keyron Crawford Auburn
Ethan Burke Texas
Derrick Moore Michigan
Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State
Nadame Tucker Western Michigan
Tyreak Sapp Florida
Wesley Williams Duke
Caden Curry Ohio State
Quintayvious Hutchins Boston College
Trey Moore Texas
Vincent Anthony Duke
Logan Fano Utah
Max Llewellyn Iowa
George Gumbs Florida
Patrick Payton LSU
Aidan Hubbard Northwestern
Jack Pyburn LSU
Marvin Jones Oklahoma
Nyjalik Kelly UCF
Mason Reiger Wisconsin

DL measurements

Player School Height Weight Hand Arm Wingspan
Peter Woods Clemson 6-2 ½ 298 9⅛ 31¼ 76⅝
Lee Hunter Texas Tech 6-3 ½ 318 33¼ 80⅝
Kayden McDonald Ohio State 6-2 ⅛ 326 9⅝ 32¼ 78⅛
Keldric Faulk Auburn 6-5 ⅞ 276 34⅜ 82¼
Christen Miller Georgia 6-3 ¾ 321 10 33 80⅛
Caleb Banks Florida 6-6 ¼ 327 10⅞ 35 85¾
Jaishawn Barham Michigan 6-3 ½ 240 10¼ 34⅛
Chris McClellan Missouri 6-4 313 11 34
Rayshaun Benny Michigan 6-3 298 33⅜
Domonique Orange Iowa State 6-2 322 10¼ 33⅜
Dontae Corleone Cincinnati 6-0 ⅝ 340 31⅞
Nick Barrett South Carolina 6-3 312 10 33⅜
Darrell Jackson Jr. Florida State 6-5 ⅝ 315 11 34¾
LT Overton Alabama 6-3 274 10⅝ 33¼
Kaleb Proctor Southeastern Louisiana 6-2 291 33
Tim Keenan Alabama 6-1 327 8⅝ 30½
Zxavian Harris Ole Miss 6-8 330 10 34⅝
Skyler Gill-Howard Texas Tech 6-1 280 30⅝
Gracen Halton Oklahoma 6-2 ⅝ 293 10 31⅛ 77¾
DeMonte Capehart Clemson 6-5 313 10¼ 33⅞
Albert Regis Texas A&M 6-1 295 9⅝ 31⅝
Tyler Onyedim Texas A&M 6-3 ½ 292 10⅛ 34⅛
Bryson Eason Tennessee 6-2 323 10 33⅛
David Gusta Kentucky 6-2 308 10 31⅛
Brandon Cleveland NC State 6-3 307 32⅜
Zane Durant Penn State 6-1 290 10⅝ 31⅞
Damonic Williams Oklahoma 6-2 305 10 33⅛
Gary Smith III UCLA 6-1 319 9⅝ 32⅝
Cameron Ball Arkansas 6-4 310 33
Bobby Jamison-Travis Auburn 6-3 328 9⅝ 34¼
Deven Eastern Minnesota 6-5 315 10 34
Jackie Marshall Baylor 6-2 ½ 293 32

DL testing numbers

Name School 40-yard dash 10-yard split Vertical (in) Broad (in) 3-cone Shuttle Bench (reps)
Peter Woods Clemson
Lee Hunter Texas Tech
Kayden McDonald Ohio State
Keldric Faulk Auburn
Christen Miller Georgia
Caleb Banks Florida
Jaishawn Barham Michigan
Chris McClellan Missouri
Rayshaun Benny Michigan
Domonique Orange Iowa State
Dontay Corleone Cincinnati
Nick Barrett South Carolina
Darrell Jackson Florida State
LT Overton Alabama
Kaleb Proctor SE Louisiana
Clay Patterson Stanford
Jordan van den Berg Georgia Tech
Tim Keenan Alabama
Zxavian Harris Ole Miss
Skyler Gill-Howard Texas Tech
Gracen Halton Oklahoma
DeMonte Capehart Clemson
Albert Regis Texas A&M
Tyler Onyedim Texas A&M
Bryson Eason Tennessee
Brandon Cleveland NC State
David Gusta Kentucky
Zane Durant Penn State
Damonic Williams Oklahoma
Gary Smith UCLA
Cameron Ball Arkansas
Bobby Jamison-Travis Auburn
Deven Eastern Minnesota
Jackie Marshall Baylor

LB measurements

Player School Height Weight Hand Arm Wingspan
Sonny Styles Ohio State 6-5 244 10 32⅞ 80⅞
Anthony Hill Texas 6-2 238 9⅝ 32⅜ 79
Jake Golday Cincinnati 6-4 ½ 239 31⅞ 76⅞
Josiah Trotter Missouri 6-2 237 10¼ 32¼
CJ Allen Georgia 6-0 ¾ 230 10⅛ 31½ 75½
Kyle Louis Pittsburgh 6-0 220 31¼
Jacob Rodriguez Texas Tech 6-1 231 30⅞
Lander Barton Utah 6-5 233 32¼
Harold Perkins Jr. LSU 6-1 223 8⅛ 31⅜
Red Murdock Buffalo 6-2 232 10⅜ 31
Keyshaun Elliott Arizona State 6-2 231 31¼
Deontae Lawson Alabama 6-3 226 31⅞
Bryce Boettcher Oregon 6-1 233 9 30⅝
Taurean York Texas A&M 5-11 226 8⅜ 30
Jimmy Rolder Michigan 6-2 ½ 238 9⅝ 30½
Aiden Fisher Indiana 6-1 232 31⅛
Wade Woodaz Clemson 6-3 236 10 32⅝
Jack Kelly BYU 6-2 240 9⅛ 31⅛
Kaleb Elarms-Orr TCU 6-2 234 9 31½
Scooby Williams Texas A&M 6-2 231 32
Justin Jefferson Alabama 6-0 223 10 31⅝
Xavian Sorey Arkansas 6-2 228 9⅝ 31⅝
Namdi Obiazor TCU 6-3 229 10½ 30⅝
Owen Heinecke Oklahoma 6-1 ½ 227 9⅝ 30⅛
Kendal Daniels Oklahoma 6-5 242 32⅝
Eric Gentry USC 6-7 221 10½ 35
Karson Sharar Iowa 6-1 ⅝ 231 10⅛ 31⅛
Wesley Bissainthe Miami 6-2 225 9⅝ 31⅞

LB testing numbers

Name School 40-yard dash 10-yard split Vertical (in) Broad (in) 3-cone Shuttle Bench (reps)
Sonny Styles Ohio State
Anthony Hill Texas
Jake Golday Cincinnati
Josiah Trotter Missouri
CJ Allen Georgia
Kyle Louis Pittsburgh
Jacob Rodriguez Texas Tech
Lander Barton Utah
Harold Perkins LSU
Arion Carter Tennessee
Red Murdock Buffalo
Cian Slone N.C. State
Keyshaun Elliott Arizona State
Deontae Lawson Alabama
Bryce Boettcher Oregon
Taurean York Texas A&M
Jimmy Rolder Michigan
Aiden Fisher Indiana
Wade Woodaz Clemson
Jack Kelly BYU
Kaleb Elarms-Orr TCU
Scooby Williams Texas A&M
Justin Jefferson Alabama
Xavian Sorey Arkansas
Namdi Obiazor TCU
Owen Heinecke Oklahoma
Kendal Daniels Oklahoma
Eric Gentry USC
Karson Sharar Iowa
Wesley Bissainthe Miami

Friday: TE and DB measurements and testing numbers

Results will be added here as testing begins.

Saturday: QB, RB and WR measurements and testing numbers

Results will be added here as testing begins.

Sunday: OL measurements and testing numbers

Results will be added here as testing begins.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

Canada’s Nick Taylor trending toward best majors finish at Masters

Published

on

AUGUSTA, Ga. — The theme of the week for Nick Taylor has been staying steady. Saturday at the Masters was another perfect example of that.

And now he’s trending toward recording his best career finish at a major championship.  

Taylor, who shot a 2-under 70 in the third round, made four birdies Saturday, including a solid one on the par-4 18th. He also hit his wedge approach on the par-5 15th to just a foot and rolled in an awfully slippery birdie effort on No. 9 from the back of the green towards the front.  

“They’re all slippery out here,” Taylor said with a smile.     

Advertisement

Taylor made two bogeys in the third round, the first coming on the par-3 12th after he was stymied in the front bunker, but said that was a great save.  

“Honestly, I really had no chance to hit the green. I was trying to bank it in the hill and pop it up. If it went through, it would be okay. If I left it in the bunker, I thought it was all right. You know, that was a big putt to kind of keep some momentum going to salvage a four, but just not a great 9-iron, and I guess not a great break, but it was more so a poor shot,” Taylor said.  

Much has been made about Taylor’s poor results in majors up until last year after he missed eight straight cuts, but he’s steadied himself on the game’s biggest stages of late — and now he’ll be playing in the late afternoon for the second time in the last three majors.   

The Masters is unique with everyone being present and engaged with the goings on — and of course, the Masters roars are iconic — and Taylor said, being in a late group, meant that he heard the moans when Rory McIlroy made a bogey on the first hole, and the huge ovation when Shane Lowry aced the par-3 6th.  

Advertisement

“It’s just fun being out there hearing that stuff. Happy to be up close to the lead to kind of experience all that,” Taylor said. “I think last year on the weekend at the U.S. Open (where Taylor recorded his best result at a major), I was in one of the final groups there, and I have enough to draw back on that, so today wasn’t anything overwhelming that way. 

“I think tomorrow will be exciting.” 

Taylor is tied for 21st heading into the final round at Augusta National.  

Corey Conners, meanwhile, will need a big final day if he wants to get into red figures for the week. The good news is that on Saturday, he proved he can still score his way around Augusta National — he’ll just need to minimize his mistakes for Sunday.  

Advertisement

Conners, who is tied for 44th, made six birdies in the third round but gave most of them back, with five bogeys sprinkled throughout the day.  

“I did a good job. On some of the holes I’ve given myself good looks — just too many mistakes to not have the round that I wanted,” Conners said.  

Conners hit his drive on No. 2 into the forest and then hit his approach on the par-5 13th into the creek in front of the green — both mishits leading to bogeys. He also missed a five-footer for par on his closing hole.  

“Felt like I played a lot of holes exactly how I wanted to and gave myself good chances that I was able to convert; few holes where not quite as planned,” Conners said.  

Advertisement

“I did roll in some nice putts. Couple tough misses on two and 11 that hit way too the left with the driver. Other than that, was really solid. And then, yeah, a lot of good putts. Just wasn’t really able to put a good round together.”  

Conners, emotionally, is ever steady. But he admitted he wasn’t thrilled with such an up-and-down scorecard in the third round. For Sunday, Conners said he simply wanted to build off “the good stuff.”  

“You can’t really force things around here, so (for Sunday) just try and play my game hopefully (be a) little more consistent and be steady and have some fun and they’ll result in some birdies,” Conners said.  

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Tyson Fury returns with vulnerability and teaches Anthony Joshua a valuable lesson

Published

on

Morning Headlines

Arslanbek Makhmudov recently caught the attention of the boxing world by wrestling a bear in Dagestan. And from the first round on Saturday night, he seemed to realise that wrestling Tyson Fury was a better option than boxing him. Yet on this occasion, that’s no comment on the wizardry that Fury can produce in the ring, but rather on Makhmudov’s flaws. The story of this fight was that, luckily for Fury, those flaws eclipsed the Briton’s own, increasingly apparent faults.

This wasn’t the triumphant return of the “Gypsy King”, see, but an underwhelming – perhaps even concerning – return to the ring from the former world heavyweight champion, as he emerged from his fifth retirement.

Sixteen months on from his second defeat by Oleksandr Usyk, Fury was back; three-and-a-half years after his last fight on home soil, he was back in Britain. The goal of this points win over Makhmudov was to set up a long-overdue duel with compatriot Anthony Joshua, who watched on from the front row, and while that contest still gets the juices flowing (just), Fury’s performance here did not.

Tyson Fury after beating Arslanbek Makhmudov on points
Tyson Fury after beating Arslanbek Makhmudov on points (Getty Images for Netflix)

In the cold shell of Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, before a smattering of empty seats, Makhmudov came forward in laboured movements, hurling overhands that Fury could see coming before his opponent had even dreamed them up.

Yet one early entry did trouble Fury enough to elicit an echoing “ooh!” from the stands, as a right hand connected over the top. Early in the second round, there was also a nervy movement for Fury, who was arguably backing up too frequently in a passive start. Maybe there was an element of the 37-year-old simply wishing to stay mobile and remote from Makhmudov in the earliest rounds, in which the Russian is at his most dangerous, but Fury was doing little besides throwing sporadic jabs to the body.

Perhaps they were an investment for the later rounds, though, and in any case, it didn’t take long for him to shift gears. But are there as many gears as before?

Advertisement

Fury began to let his hands go as round two neared its conclusion, and anticipation rose when he sidestepped Makhmudov and attacked with the 36-year-old trapped against the ropes. By the third round, a trend had emerged, with Fury able to slingshot himself off the ropes at just the right moment, getting close enough to force Makhmudov to overshoot with his right hand.

Still, after continually allowing the Russian to steer him towards the ropes, Fury was caught flush by a left hook, again stirring up some nervousness in round four. However, Makhmudov’s efforts to build on the attack were messy, and although he landed another left before long, Fury again turned him against the ropes and slid a cross onto his chin – which was slack amid another deep breath.

Fury went the distance with Makhmudov but was always a step or two ahead
Fury went the distance with Makhmudov but was always a step or two ahead (Getty Images for Netflix)
DAZN logo

Enjoy 185+ fights a year on DAZN, the Global Home of Boxing

Never miss a fight from top promoters. Watch on your devices anywhere, anytime.

Advertisement

Buy Now

ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.

DAZN logo

Enjoy 185+ fights a year on DAZN, the Global Home of Boxing

Never miss a fight from top promoters. Watch on your devices anywhere, anytime.

Buy Now

ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.

Advertisement

The rest of the round was back and forth, with both men taking a punch to land one, while a grappling-heavy round five sucked the atmosphere out of the stadium – a common feeling in Tottenham this season, courtesy of their Premier League travails. In round six, the most-interesting action was in the crowd, as a fight was broken up by security, though Fury did his best to put a dent in Makhmudov with hooks to the body.

The constant chatter in the stands was proof of a disinterested audience at this point, although two clean overhands from Makhmudov brought the fans to attention. Perhaps it was becoming clear, even this early, that Fury was not going to find a finish, despite trainer SugarHill Steward’s desperate pleas between rounds.

For as slow and one-dimensional as Makhmudov looked, Fury was off the pace as well. Two-dimensional, sure, with the occasional southpaw switch and the eventual, effective introduction of uppercuts, but not inventive enough to assert himself in the captivating manner of old – or not sprightly enough to act fully on his inventive impulses.

Fury looked somewhat close to finishing Makhmudov in the final rounds
Fury looked somewhat close to finishing Makhmudov in the final rounds (Getty Images for Netflix)

At one point in the ninth, Makhmudov was a sitting duck against the ropes, and rather than fire off shots at the Russian, Fury simply leaned on him. And while Fury’s uppercut started to serve him well in the later rounds, when he finally did look capable of a finish in the 11th, it appeared as much a result of Makhmudov’s tiredness as Fury’s power – or what’s left of it.

Of course, these faults in Fury could be down to ring rust. Yet they could be down to age and degradation.

Advertisement

The quirk is that this is okay, as long as he is paired with Joshua next. What Fury vs Joshua has always needed, as a match-up, is a sense of equality, or something close to it. Fury’s current form might just balance out with Joshua’s struggles in and out of the ring; as much as one feels guilty to factor “AJ”’s recent car crash into an evaluation of his chances in a super-fight, one also cannot ignore the grief of losing two of his teammates.

Joshua, 36, has had to reckon with the passings of Sina Ghami and Latif Ayodele in recent months, while his last three results read as such: a stoppage of a YouTuber-turned-boxer, a devastating defeat, and a KO of a mixed martial artist. Meanwhile, Fury laboured to victory here, after twice being outdone by Usyk.

Fury calling out Anthony Joshua after beating Makhmudov
Fury calling out Anthony Joshua after beating Makhmudov (Getty Images for Netflix)
Joshua (right) with Saudi boxing matchmaker Turki Alalshikh
Joshua (right) with Saudi boxing matchmaker Turki Alalshikh (Getty Images for Netflix)

Go back further, in Fury’s case, and he was lucky to outpoint the same mixed martial artist that Joshua destroyed, after beating Derek Chisora in an uneven fight the year before. So, in pursuit of Fury’s last clear win, you have to venture back to 2022, and even then it was not an especially impressive result.

At least Fury’s boxing tools worked better than the microphone that was handed to Joshua, after Fury had formally called him out. But even when AJ was given a working mic and hinted that he would face Fury next, there was some room for doubt. It was telling that, when boxing supremo Turki Alalshikh beckoned Joshua’s promoter into the ring, Eddie Hearn would not budge.

Fury vs Joshua is not a done deal, but it must be made immediately, before both boxers are done. Deal?

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Randers vs FC Copenhagen Prediction and Betting Tips

Published

on

Randers will entertain FC Copenhagen at Cepheus Park in the Danish Superliga on Sunday. Both teams are fighting to beat the drop and must finish in the top four of the relegation round to make it.

Randers vs FC Copenhagen Preview

Randers finished ninth in the regular season to qualify for the relegation round. Out of 22 matches, they won only seven, drew five times, and lost 10 matches, to end the regular season with 26 points. It was not an impressive campaign, but the hosts will be looking to conserve their place in the top flight.

Hestene had a better campaign last season, finishing fourth out of 12 teams and earning qualification to the championship round. However, they finished fourth on 48 points, 15 points shy of Copenhagen, who won the league. It has been rocky for the hosts, but they still have the chance to save their season.

FC Copenhagen are battling an underwhelming trend. More was expected from them than what they have shown so far this season, considering their impressive form last term. They finished seventh in the regular season, just below the qualification zone for the championship round.

Byens Hold are the most successful team in the league, having won the title a record 16 times, including their accolade last season. However, they will miss the opportunity to defend their title this time. Randers prevailed over FC Copenhagen 2-1 on the road in the sides’ last meeting.


Randers vs FC Copenhagen Head-to-Head and Key Numbers

  • Randers have won once and lost four times in their last five matches against Copenhagen.
  • Randers have won once and lost four times in their last five matches at home against Copenhagen.
  • Randers have won thrice and lost twice in their last five matches at home in all competitions.
  • FC Copenhagen have won once, drawn once, and lost thrice in their last five matches on the road.
  • Randers have won twice, drawn once, and lost twice in their last five matches, while FC Copenhagen have won twice and lost thrice. Form Guide: Randers D-L-W-W-L, FC Copenhagen -W-L-L-W-L.

Randers vs FC Copenhagen Prediction

Randers will be fighting to avoid dropping to the bottom two spots, which is synonymous with relegation to the First Division.

FC Copenhagen are eying a ticket to a European competition. If they finish atop the table, they could qualify for the European play-off match.

Advertisement

FC Copenhagen are the favorites to win this match based on experience and individuality.

Prediction: Randers 1-2 FC Copenhagen


Randers vs FC Copenhagen Betting Tips

Tip 1: Result – FC Copenhagen to win

Tip 2: Game to have over 2.5 goals – Yes

Advertisement

Tip 3: FC Copenhagen to score first – Yes

Tip 4: Randers to score – Yes