India vs England, 2nd ODI Live Streaming: Skipper Shubman Gill proved his leadership credentials while Axar Patel showed his all-round skills as India recovered from a morale-shattering T20I series loss against England to win the first ODI. As the focus shifts to the second ODI, fans are keeping their fingers crossed, hoping to see Gill feature in the XI in Cardiff. The captain was retired hurt in the ODI series opener but is expected to be available for Thursday’s match. Gurnoor Brar was another player who had some fitness-related struggles in the last game, but India have Prince Yadav as backup if he is unavailable. The primary focus, however, would remain on the veteran duo of Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli, who failed to fire in the first ODI.

When will the India vs England, 2nd ODI be played?

The India vs England, 2nd ODI will be played on Tuesday, July 16.

Where will the India vs England, 2nd ODI be played?

The India vs England, 2nd ODI will be played at the Sophia Gardens, Cardiff

What time will the India vs England, 2nd ODI start?

The India vs England, 2nd ODI will start at 5:30 PM IST. The toss will take place 30 minutes before.

Which TV channels will telecast the India vs England, 2nd ODI?

The India vs England, 2nd ODI will be aired live on the Sony Sports Network.

Where to follow the live streaming of the India vs England, 2nd ODI?

The India vs England, 2nd ODI will be streamed live on the JioHotstar app.

(All the details are as per the information provided by the broadcaster)

Featured Video Of The Day

France vs Morocco Highlights | Mbappé Inspires France to FIFA World Cup Semifinal Victory

For the players contesting the Fifa World Cup final, half-time is usually a tightly managed 15-minute race against the clock.

There is little room for ceremony. Players must leave the field, recover physically, receive tactical instructions, undergo treatment, change equipment when required and return in time for the second half.

At MetLife Stadium on Sunday, that familiar routine could be disrupted by something unprecedented at a World Cup: a full-scale half-time performance staged on the pitch.

Fifa is targeting an interval of around 20 minutes for the final, with an 11-minute show curated by Coldplay frontman Chris Martin. The line-up is expected to include Justin Bieber, Shakira, BTS, Madonna, Burna Boy, conductor Gustavo Dudamel and the PS22 Chorus, along with characters from Sesame Street and The Muppets.

Yet, behind the scale and spectacle lies an important sporting question: can football’s biggest match absorb an extended entertainment break without losing its rhythm?

The proposed interval would be only about five minutes longer than the standard break allowed under the Laws of the Game. But the challenge is not merely the duration of the performance. A stage must be erected on the pitch, the artists must perform, the equipment must be removed and the playing surface must be cleared before the teams can return.

In a match in which momentum, concentration and physical readiness could determine the world champion, those additional minutes may carry greater significance than they appear to on paper.

What do football’s rules say about half-time?

The International Football Association Board (Ifab), which writes the game’s laws, states that the half-time interval must not exceed 15 minutes.

The duration may be changed only with the referee’s permission.

That provision gives the match officials some flexibility, but an extension remains highly unusual in elite football. Players, coaching staff and match-day operations are all conditioned around the traditional 15-minute interval.

For the World Cup final, Fifa has said the performance itself will last 11 minutes but has not officially confirmed the total break. Multiple sources have indicated that organisers are working towards a restart within approximately 20 minutes.

That would require a tightly choreographed operation.

If the show uses all 11 minutes, only around nine minutes would remain for constructing and dismantling the stage, moving performers and equipment, checking the pitch and positioning both teams for the restart.

Any delay in one part of the operation could push the interval beyond the intended target.

Why five extra minutes could matter

A five-minute extension may appear modest compared with the prolonged intervals seen in American football. The difference lies in how the two sports operate.

NFL players are accustomed to frequent stoppages, specialist substitutions and segmented periods of action. The Super Bowl’s extended half-time show has also become an established part of the event.

An extended pause could affect players in different ways.

A team controlling the match before half-time may feel that its momentum has been interrupted. A side under pressure could benefit from additional time to recover and reorganise. Players carrying minor injuries may welcome the longer treatment window, while others could find it harder to maintain physical sharpness.

Coaching staffs may have to introduce more detailed re-warm-up routines inside the dressing room or near the tunnel. Players are likely to remain active rather than seated for the entire interval, particularly if the restart is delayed beyond 20 minutes.

The challenge becomes greater because teams may not know exactly when they will be called back to the pitch. A normal half-time countdown is predictable. A live performance involving multiple artists and temporary infrastructure creates more variables. 

  A World Cup first, but not Fifa’s first experiment

The final will be the first World Cup match to feature a formal half-time show, but Fifa tested the concept at the 2025 Club World Cup final between Chelsea and Paris Saint-Germain.

That match was also held at MetLife Stadium.

Tems, J Balvin and Doja Cat performed during an interval that lasted slightly more than 24 minutes. Importantly, the stage was positioned high in the stands rather than on the playing surface.

That reduced the logistical burden around the pitch. There was no need to build and remove a major platform from the field before the players could return.

The World Cup final plan is more ambitious.

By placing the stage on the pitch, Fifa can create a more visually powerful performance for the stadium audience and global television coverage. It also introduces concerns around construction time, equipment movement and the condition of the playing surface.

MetLife Stadium’s previous experience gives organisers a useful operational template, but the stakes will be considerably higher. The Club World Cup final was a major match; the World Cup final is the most watched and scrutinised fixture in international football.

What happened during Shakira’s Copa America show?

The most relevant football precedent came during the 2024 Copa America final between Argentina and Colombia at Hard Rock Stadium.

Shakira performed at half-time, extending the interval to around 26 minutes before the second half began.

The decision attracted attention because the tournament had otherwise enforced the standard interval. Coaches and players were required to wait significantly longer than usual, and the extended pause became part of the discussion surrounding the final.

The incident demonstrated the central challenge of combining football with a major entertainment production: the advertised length of the musical performance does not represent the full interruption.

Artists must enter and leave, sound and lighting systems must be positioned, the stage must be prepared and the pitch must be cleared. Even a tightly produced show can add several minutes beyond its running time.

The Copa America final also showed that football authorities are willing to alter established match routines for commercial and entertainment purposes during showpiece events.

Fifa’s reported 20-minute target suggests it wants to avoid a repeat of the longer Copa America delay. Whether that target is realistic will depend on how quickly the temporary stage can be assembled and removed.

Why the Super Bowl model cannot simply be copied

The Super Bowl has made the half-time show one of the most valuable entertainment slots in global broadcasting.

Its performances routinely involve elaborate staging, complex lighting, large groups of dancers and headline artists. NFL players commonly remain off the field for between 20 and 30 minutes during the show, far longer than the strict 13-minute interval used during the regular season.

But the extended break is expected.

Teams know before the match that the interval will be prolonged. Coaches build it into their preparation, while players conduct structured warm-ups before returning.

The football World Cup has no such tradition.

The players in Sunday’s final will have spent their careers treating the half-time interval as a short tactical and recovery window. Even with advance warning, the change presents an unfamiliar competitive condition in the most important match of their lives.

There is also a difference in playing surfaces. A football pitch must remain clear and consistent for a game involving continuous ball movement. Temporary platforms, equipment and large production teams must be removed without damaging the turf or leaving debris.

The Super Bowl shows that an extended interval can become an accepted part of a major sporting event. It does not prove that the same format can be inserted into football without consequences. 

Can the performance fit into 20 minutes?

The planned 11-minute performance leaves organisers with a demanding timetable.

The stage must be moved into position immediately after the first-half whistle. Performers and technical personnel must enter, the show must begin on schedule and all equipment must be removed quickly afterwards.

The process must also account for television requirements, safety checks and communication between match officials, broadcasters and the two teams.

A delay of only two or three minutes at any stage could stretch the break closer to the 24-minute interval seen at the Club World Cup final.

Fifa’s task is further complicated by the size of the announced line-up. Bringing together global pop stars, musicians, a children’s chorus and television characters within an 11-minute production will require rapid transitions.

The show may use pre-positioned elements or a compact stage design to save time. Even then, taking the structure off the field may be more difficult than bringing it on.

The referee will ultimately need confirmation that the pitch is safe and both teams are ready before restarting the game.

Will one team benefit more?

The effect of an extended break may depend on the first-half score and pattern.

A team leading comfortably could use the additional time to recover and reinforce its defensive plan. It could also lose the intensity that allowed it to dominate.

A side trailing at half-time would gain extra minutes for tactical adjustments, treatment and emotional recovery. Coaches could analyse the opposition’s structure in greater detail and communicate more changes than the standard interval allows.

The longer pause may therefore act as an unintended competitive variable.

Suppose one finalist finishes the first half applying sustained pressure. The show could interrupt that momentum and allow the opponent to reset. Conversely, a team physically exhausted by pressing may receive a valuable recovery period.

Neither effect would automatically make the format unfair because both sides would receive the same interval. Yet equal time does not necessarily produce an equal sporting impact.

Football’s momentum is shaped by circumstances. The state of the match at the interval will determine whether the extra minutes feel like an advantage or an obstacle.

The commercial logic behind the spectacle

The planned show reflects Fifa’s effort to turn the World Cup final into an entertainment event extending beyond the match itself.

Coldplay’s Martin has curated a line-up designed to reach audiences across continents and musical genres. The inclusion of Bieber, Shakira, BTS, Madonna and Burna Boy gives the programme enormous global appeal.

The event is being produced by Global Citizen. Artists are reportedly not receiving performance fees.

The show is also tied to the Global Citizen Education Fund, which aims to raise $100 million to expand access to education and football opportunities for children worldwide.

This gives the ceremony a philanthropic purpose alongside its commercial and broadcasting value.

For Fifa, the attraction is clear. The Super Bowl has demonstrated how a half-time performance can become a cultural event in its own right, drawing viewers who may not otherwise watch the match.

The risk is that the entertainment becomes more intrusive than complementary.

A test that could reshape future World Cups

Sunday’s half-time show will be judged on two separate standards.

As an entertainment production, it will be measured by its scale, performances and global audience. As part of a football match, it will be assessed by whether the second half begins smoothly and whether players or coaches feel the extended interval affected the contest.

A 20-minute break completed without operational problems could encourage Fifa to repeat the concept at future tournaments.

A prolonged delay, damaged pitch or visible loss of player readiness could strengthen arguments that football’s traditional interval should remain untouched.

The governing body is trying to insert a Super Bowl-style spectacle into a sport whose rhythm has developed around a short and predictable break.

That collision between tradition and entertainment will play out on the biggest possible stage.

The artists will have 11 minutes to deliver the show. Fifa may have only a few additional minutes to prove that the World Cup final can accommodate it without changing the match itself.

England might have gone out of the World Cup with the kind of performance that would cause deep introspection in other countries, but there was none of it from the Football Association.

After a bland public statement about how “the players and Thomas gave it everything”, there were strong private indications that no consideration was being given to change – or much else.

The FA are all in, even more assured that Tuchel is the manager to finally guide England to victory at a home Euro 2028.

The deeper arguments about the future are for another day but, even in this moment, there is actually a real danger in Tuchel’s spell being broken with the players.

He was specifically appointed because of his reputation as a tactical genius who is a “winner”, well versed in getting teams over the line. And yet here were the most rudimentary tactics possible, that have cost the players a chance at history, amid inferred criticism about their “belief”.

It isn’t exactly hard to see how this could go wrong.

For now, those around the England camp are left to lament what happened at this World Cup. Some are even feeling a sense of cosmic injustice, that it will simply never be them, that it’s somehow going to go at least 62 years without a major trophy.

That failure represents almost a reverse alchemy, especially when the FA invested so much money. And yet that is precisely why there is actually a football justice to this outcome.

This will be hard for many England fans to hear but some – especially in the FA – arguably need to.

It is probably a good thing for international football that one of the wealthiest countries – already blessed with so many advantages – do not win just because they can afford to appoint the most expensive coach available.

What, after all, would the message be? What would the lesson be? That wealth is enough? That you can just bolt on a “winner” if you have enough money?

There’s already too much of that in the club game. It is a good thing that it doesn’t infect international level in the same way, that deeper ideas are needed, and it would actually be a better thing for the FA if they were forced to properly think about this.

But will they?

The response so far suggests not.

The greater frustration is that they’ve done most of the work.

English football has used its immense wealth to create a talent production system that is the envy of most of the world. There is a conveyor belt of players, especially in certain positions. The Elite Player Performance Plan has worked.

It is still a plan, however, that is not really within a bigger idea.

This is where the very appointment of Tuchel is central to a wider debate, and why it is arguably just that the FA fail – for now.

What they should actually be thinking about is what they want the English team to look like; about what the identity of the national team should be.

What are the cultural football qualities they want to enhance and build on, within a coaching framework that fits with the modern game?

The only person that actually seemed to be thinking about that, for his part, was Tuchel. He at least talked a good game about wanting England to play with “a Premier League style”. In other words, the kind of intensity that does actually fit with some of the more positive attributes of the English game.

The reality was just completely different, something that does happen with Tuchel a bit. He may have talked a good game but, outside 15 minutes against Croatia, he didn’t play one.

Rather than performing with a Premier League style, his very appointment just reflected another model of Premier League thinking.

If you have an issue, just buy your way out of it. Don’t think it through.

It is damning, if possibly inevitable, that the FA have pursued that same approach in the same era when they have institutional freedom from the Premier League.

And, to also make some allowances for Tuchel, it’s impossible not to link at least some of his performances to these wider issues.

England still don’t produce that key type of midfield controller, which may well be connected to this argument that the team still didn’t have the belief; that there’s something tactically shallow about the game intelligence of English teams.

It really is incredible how we’re back here again, as if it was 2016 or 2010 or 1998: England unable to control a game and losing to the first proper team they play.

That may sound harsh when they were on the brink of a second successive major tournament final and third in four, but that’s exactly where the line lies between success and failure.

English football is so wealthy that it can of course produce the critical mass of quality players that get you so far. But to go the distance? That rightly requires something deeper.

By the same token, this came very close to being the fourth successive year where Spain met England in major tournament finals – a women’s World Cup, a men’s Euros, a women’s Euros and now not, ultimately, a men’s World Cup.

And for all that some will bristle at the idea of including the women’s game with the men’s, it is acutely relevant here because of how they speak to the football cultures.

All three of those games followed exactly the same pattern, and this alternative World Cup final would have been the exact same: Spain dominating, England scrabbling around the edges and trying to force any response.

England did win one under Sarina Wiegman, but that was largely down to her in-game acumen, a lot of luck and the strength in depth that came from substitutes.

Again, it doesn’t exactly say much for England as an idea of play.

By contrast, consider the two managers to now have knocked England out of the most recent men’s competitions, who also happen to be those in the final. They are two classic national federation men: Lionel Scaloni and Luis de la Fuente.

In other words, the kind of coaches that the FA wouldn’t dream of looking at. Where is their Champions League, after all?

The FA are actually correct not to look at them, but only because their actual value comes from knowing their own football cultures so well. De la Fuente has worked with the majority of the Spanish players as kids.

He fits an idea that England don’t have.

And while it is also correct that the English system isn’t producing coaches in the same way it is producing players, there is talent coming through. England arguably even have their own De la Fuente in Lee Carsley. His six matches ended up producing a better idea of football more frequently than Tuchel.

And for all that it may seem preposterous for England to appoint such a lowly name, this was exactly the reaction others had when Scaloni and De la Fuente were appointed, respectively.

There is one final point worth repeating in all of this.

This is absolutely nothing to do with Tuchel being a German, or any other nationality.

It is about the national game’s authorities not having a proper idea about what it is to be an English team.

For Livvy Dunne, watching her boyfriend, Pittsburgh Pirates ace Paul Skenes, is not easy.

Dunne, 23, said watching Skenes pitch is harder than competing as a gymnast at LSU and that she goes through a whirlwind of emotions during his starts.

“Obviously, I think I got put on blast a few times while watching him,” Dunne said during an appearance on MLB Network with Skenes. “I get nervous because I obviously want him to do his best. I love him. He usually pops out, does his thing, does amazing. But I feel every emotion while he’s out there doing his thing.”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Paul Skenes poses for a photo with Olivia Dunne during the red carpet photoshoot at Loews Philadelphia in Philadelphia, Pa., on Tuesday, July 14, 2026. (Rob Tringali/MLB Photos via Getty Images)

“It’s completely out of my control, which is really hard because while I was competing, I mean, I was in control of my own destiny. Now I just need to sit back, relax and trust him.”

Dunne went viral earlier this season when she was seen mouthing “F—” after Skenes gave up a home run to Toronto Blue Jays star George Springer. The former LSU star attends many of the games Skenes pitches and is an ardent supporter of her boyfriend and the Pirates.

Dunne has gotten a firsthand look at Skenes’ stuff as she stepped into the batter’s box before the Pirates ace left for spring training.

ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!

Pittsburgh Pirates pitcher Paul Skenes and Livvy Dunne walk the red carpet for the MLB All-Star Game on July 14, 2026, in Philadelphia. (Chris Szagola/AP Photo)

“I think all offseason Paul wanted me to stand in while he was pitching. I’ve been procrastinating all offseason because it’s scary and everybody told me it would be very scary,” Dunne said.

“It was the last day of the offseason before he went to spring training and he was like, ‘Nope, come. You’re going to stand there.’ And I thought he was joking, and I stood and I was frozen.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Pittsburgh Pirates pitcher Paul Skenes walks to the dugout after handing the ball to manager Don Kelly during the sixth inning of a game against the Milwaukee Brewers in Pittsburgh on Sunday, July 12, 2026. (Gene J. Puskar/AP)

Skenes said he buzzed her tower, meaning he threw high and inside to his girlfriend.

“She had been asking me, too. She wanted to see it, or she said she wanted to see it, and then time comes, we got to see if you’re about it,” Skenes said.

The reigning NL Cy Young winner has an 8-8 record and a 3.57 ERA this season, and has been an anchor for a Pirates team that is in the thick of the National League Wild Card race at 50-47.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Build a Soccer Squad codes provide rewards that can help you build a better soccer team. When redeemed, they grant you Rerolls and Refreshes, both of which can help you get better soccer players for your team. These codes are particularly helpful for beginners, as they can provide them with the resources necessary to make the best possible team composition.

This article includes every active code for Build a Soccer Squad, along with a short guide on how to redeem them.

Bookmark this article to access the latest Roblox game codes in Build a Soccer Squad. We’ll keep updating the page whenever new codes for Build a Soccer Squad are issued.

Active Build a Soccer Squad codes

The table below includes all active codes for Build a Soccer Squad.

How to redeem active Build a Soccer Squad codes

The steps below outline how to redeem codes in Build a Soccer Squad:

• Launch Build a Soccer Squad on the Roblox Player app.
• Use the Codes button on the right to access the code box.
• Type in an active code in the code box and hit the Enter button to redeem the associated prizes.
• Repeat for all active codes.

Build a Soccer Squad code rewards importance

Upon redeeming codes in Build a Soccer Squad, you will receive Rerolls and Refreshes. Rerolls can be used while building a team to reroll the selection of players you receive upon first hitting the Roll button. This is particularly important if you’re looking to get players for a specific position on the field.

If you’re looking for players from a specific country, then that’s where you can use Refreshes. For example, if your regular rolls give you a selection of players from Argentina, you can use a Refresh to see if you can get Messi in the rerolled pool.

Both of these resources can be used strategically to make a team with a high median score, which will allow you to earn more money.

Also read: Unique Roblox username ideas for new players

Inactive Build a Soccer Squad codes

Currently, there are no inactive codes for Build a Soccer Squad. Since all Roblox codes eventually expire, there’s a chance the currently active ones will become unusable in the future. When that happens, we will update this section accordingly.

Where to find new Build a Soccer Squad codes

New codes are revealed in-game via an on-screen notification, which you can then enter in the Codes menu for rewards. You can also find new codes on the game’s official Roblox page. Additionally, you can keep a close eye on this page for updates to the title’s code list.

FAQs on Build a Soccer Squad codes

What are the latest codes for Build a Soccer Squad?

The latest code for Build a Soccer Squad is “CONSOLE”.

What are the rewards for redeeming codes in Build a Soccer Squad?

Upon redeeming codes in this title, you can get Refreshes and Rerolls as rewards.

Are the codes in Build a Soccer Squad case-sensitive?

No, the codes in this experience are not case-sensitive, so you don’t have to keep the letter case in mind while redeeming them.