Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Sports

How do World Cup playoffs work? Explaining format, pathway for teams and more for UEFA, intercontinental versions

Published

on

How do World Cup playoffs work? Explaining format, pathway for teams and more for UEFA, intercontinental versions originally appeared on The Sporting News. Add The Sporting News as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

JUMP TO:

As countries all around the world hope to be amongst the 48 nations participating in the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the final spots in the tournament field are being filled.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Now that the World Cup draw has been completed and 42 of the 48 nations have cemented their places at the final tournament, there are just the six playoff participants yet to be determined to fill out the field.

Those places will be filled by the UEFA and intercontinental playoffs, which take place just three months before the World Cup commences in the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

The Sporting News details all you need to know about the playoffs, including who will participate, how they qualified, and the format by which the competition will be contested.

2026 WORLD CUP HQ:Latest World Cup news | Full World Cup schedule | Buy World Cup tickets

Advertisement

Advertisement

What are the World Cup playoffs?

The World Cup playoffs are two mini-tournaments that offer certain teams another route into the finals if they failed to qualify automatically.

There are two different World Cup playoffs: one for European (UEFA) teams, and another comprising nations from different confederations (the intercontinental playoffs).

Since UEFA gets 16 spots at the newly expanded 48-team FIFA World Cup, they have their own playoff tournament for the last of those four places. The rest of the world, meanwhile, contests an inter-confederation playoff to determine the final two participants at the tournament.

Advertisement

Advertisement

The winners of the six different playoff pathways were assigned to Pot 4 for the World Cup group-stage draw in December, meaning they can expect to face a more difficult tournament than if they had qualified automatically.

UEFA playoffs

In UEFA World Cup qualifying for 2026, there were 54 participants hoping to secure one of Europe’s 16 places at the competition.

Those 54 nations were spread out between 12 groups. While the group winner advanced to the World Cup automatically, the runners-up were placed in a knockout bracket along with a few UEFA Nations League qualifiers to determine four more participants.

Advertisement

Advertisement

FIFA intercontinental playoffs

The intercontinental playoffs, officially known as either the inter-confederation playoffs or the World Cup playoff tournament, is the final pathway for teams hoping to qualify for the World Cup.

Started in 1998 as a one-off matchup between an Asian and Oceania qualifier, it has grown gradually into the six-team tournament it is today. The 2026 edition comprises one nation from the AFC, CAF, CONMEBOL and OFC confederations, and two from CONCACAF.

Each four-year cycle, as the format of World Cup qualification shifts with the times, the intercontinental playoffs also change slightly to fit the back-end of the qualifying system.

Advertisement

Advertisement

How do the playoffs work?

The UEFA and intercontinental editions have different entry methods, and the European version has a larger field, but each is essentially the same format: a single-elimination tournament in which teams will compete to reach a final, the winners of which will qualify for the World Cup.

2026 UEFA playoffs format

The second-place teams in each of the 16 UEFA qualifying groups advance to the playoffs, along with the four best-ranked group winners from the latest UEFA Nations League who failed to qualify automatically for the World Cup.

The teams are split into four pathways, each with four teams, contesting a four-team mini-bracket to determine the final qualifiers.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Both semifinals and finals are single-elimination matches, with extra time and penalties used if necessary to determine a winner. The host of each path’s final was chosen by a random draw. The seeded teams play their semifinals at home.

Pathway 1

Semifinal

Date

Advertisement

Time (ET)

Match

Location

March 26

Advertisement

2:45 p.m.

Italy vs. Northern Ireland

New Balance Arena (Bergamo, Italy)

March 26

Advertisement

2:45 p.m.

Wales vs. Bosnia & Herzegovina

Cardiff City Stadium (Cardiff, Wales)

Final

Advertisement

Date

Time (ET)

Match

Location

Advertisement

March 31

2:45 p.m.

Wales/Bosnia & Herzegovina vs. Italy/N. Ireland

TBD (Wales/Bosnia & Herzegovina winner host)

Advertisement

Pathway 2

Semifinal

Date

Time (ET)

Match

Advertisement

Location

March 26

2:45 p.m.

Ukraine vs. Sweden

Advertisement

Estadi Ciutat de Valencia (Valencia, Spain)

March 26

2:45 p.m.

Poland vs. Albania

Advertisement

PGE Narodowy (Warsaw, Poland)

Final

Date

Time (ET)

Advertisement

Match

Location

March 31

2:45 p.m.

Advertisement

Ukraine/Sweden vs. Poland/Albania

TBD (Ukraine/Sweden winner host)

Pathway 3

Semifinal

Date

Advertisement

Time (ET)

Match

Location

March 26

Advertisement

12 p.m.

Turkey vs. Romania

Besiktas Stadyumu (Istanbul, Turkey)

March 26

Advertisement

2:45 p.m.

Slovakia vs. Kosovo

Tehelne pole (Bratislava, Slovakia)

Final

Advertisement

Date

Time (ET)

Match

Location

Advertisement

March 31

2:45 p.m.

Slovakia/Kosovo vs. Turkey/Romania

TBD (Slovakia/Kosovo winner host)

Advertisement

Pathway 4

Semifinal

Date

Time (ET)

Match

Advertisement

Location

March 26

2:45 p.m.

Denmark vs. North Macedonia

Advertisement

Parken (Copenhagen, Denmark)

March 26

2:45 p.m.

Czechia vs. Rep. of Ireland

Advertisement

Fortuna Arena (Prague-Vrsovice, Czechia)

Final

Date

Time (ET)

Advertisement

Match

Location

March 31

2:45 p.m.

Advertisement

Czechia/Rep. of Ireland vs. Denmark/N. Macedonia

TBD (Czechia/Rep. of Ireland winner host)

2026 intercontinental playoffs format

The six participants were broken into two three-team brackets, with each bracket producing one qualifier.

The brackets were filled out by the draw, which took place on November 20 at the FIFA headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland.

Advertisement

Teams were seeded based on FIFA ranking, with the top two seeds earning a bye to their bracket’s final, while the other four teams contest the semifinals.

Advertisement

Pathway 1

Semifinal

Date

Advertisement

Time (ET)

Match

Location

March 26

Advertisement

7 p.m.

New Caledonia vs. Jamaica

Estadio Akron (Guadalajara)

Final

Advertisement

Date

Time (ET)

Match

Location

Advertisement

March 31

2 p.m.

DR Congo vs. Semifinal winner

Estadio Akron (Guadalajara)

Advertisement

Pathway 2

Semifinal

Date

Time (ET)

Match

Advertisement

Location

March 26

1 p.m.

Bolivia vs. Suriname

Advertisement

Estadio BBVA (Monterrey)

Final

Date

Time (ET)

Advertisement

Match

Location

March 31

8 p.m.

Advertisement

Iraq vs. Semifinal winner

Estadio BBVA (Monterrey)

Which teams are playing in the World Cup playoffs?

Six teams will contest the 2026 FIFA intercontinental playoff, producing the final two World Cup participants. In the UEFA edition, 16 teams will compete for another two spots in the tournament proper.

Teams in UEFA playoffs

In the UEFA playoffs, the 12 group runners-up are joined by four qualifiers from the UEFA Nations League.

Advertisement

First up are the highest-ranked group winners yet to qualify, from League A all the way down to League D. If there are fewer than four of those remaining yet to qualify, they move to the highest-ranked group runners-up from the Nations League.

Nation

Qualified via

FIFA rank

Advertisement

Slovakia

Group A runner-up

44

Kosovo

Advertisement

Group B runner-up

79

Denmark

Group C runner-up

Advertisement

21

Ukraine

Group D runner-up

30

Advertisement

Turkey

Group E runner-up

25

Rep. of Ireland

Advertisement

Group F runner-up

59

Poland

Group G runner-up

Advertisement

34

Bosnia & Herzegovina

Group H runner-up

71

Advertisement

Italy

Group I runner-up

13

Wales

Advertisement

Group J runner-up

35

Albania

Group K runner-up

Advertisement

63

Czechia

Group L runner-up

43

Advertisement

Romania

UEFA Nations League

49

Sweden

Advertisement

UEFA Nations League

42

Northern Ireland

UEFA Nations League

Advertisement

69

North Macedonia

UEFA Nations League

65

Advertisement

Teams in intercontinental playoffs

Each confederation will produce one participant, while CONCACAF will have two. The below table details how they qualified for this phase.

Nation

Confederation

Qualified via

Advertisement

FIFA rank

Iraq

AFC

AFC playoff winner

Advertisement

58

DR Congo

CAF

CAF playoff winner

Advertisement

48

Jamaica

CONCACAF

Highest-ranking group runner-up

Advertisement

70

Suriname

CONCACAF

Second highest-ranking group runner-up

Advertisement

123

Bolivia

CONMEBOL

Seventh-place finisher

Advertisement

76

New Caledonia

OFC

Qualifying tournament runner-up

Advertisement

150

When are the World Cup playoffs?

Both the UEFA and intercontinental playoffs will be contested in the March FIFA international window.

Advertisement

All semifinals are on March 26, with the finals on March 31.

Advertisement

At the conclusion of these events, all 48 World Cup participants for the 2026 tournament will be confirmed.

Where are the World Cup playoffs played?

In the UEFA playoffs, the seeded teams play their semifinals at home. The home teams for the finalists are determined by a draw conducted in advance.

This is different to how the inter-confederation playoffs are staged.

Traditionally, the FIFA intercontinental playoffs are hosted by the same host nation that the coming World Cup will be contested in.

Advertisement

With the 2026 World Cup set to be played across three countries (USA, Canada, and Mexico), FIFA confirmed what the governor of Mexican province Nuevo Leon, Samuel Garcia gave away a month prior — that the intercontinental playoffs will be held in Mexico.

Advertisement

Two venues will hold two matches each — Estadio Akron in Guadalajara, and Estadio BBVA in Monterrey.

Where will the playoff winners be drawn at the World Cup?

The 2026 FIFA World Cup draw on December 6, 2025 set the matchups for the 2026 tournament.

Advertisement

With the playoff participants not yet known at the time of the draw, all playoff winners were entered into Pot 4 and drawn accordingly.

The UEFA playoff winners were drawn into groups A, B, D, and F. The intercontinental playoff winners were drawn into groups I and K.

Group A table

Pos

Team

Advertisement

PTS

GP

W

L

Advertisement

D

GF

GA

GD

Advertisement

1.

Mexico

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

2.

South Africa

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

3.

South Korea

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

4.

UEFA Playoff D

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

The UEFA Playoff D qualifier will be either Czechia, Republic of Ireland, Denmark, or North Macedonia

Advertisement

Group A fixtures

Date

Time (ET)

Advertisement

Match

Location

Thu, Jun. 11

3 p.m.

Advertisement

Mexico vs. South Africa

Mexico City Stadium (Mexico City, MEX)

Thu, Jun. 11

10 p.m.

Advertisement

South Korea vs. UEFA Playoff D winner

Estadio Guadalajara (Guadalajara, MEX)

Thu, Jun. 18

12 p.m.

Advertisement

UEFA Playoff D winner vs. South Africa

Mercedes-Benz Stadium (Atlanta, GA)

Thu, Jun. 18

9 p.m.

Advertisement

Mexico vs. South Korea

Estadio Guadalajara (Guadalajara, MEX)

Wed, Jun. 24

9 p.m.

Advertisement

UEFA Playoff D winner vs. Mexico

Mexico City Stadium (Mexico City, MEX)

Wed, Jun. 24

9 p.m.

Advertisement

South Africa vs. South Korea

Estadio Monterrey (Monterrey, MEX)

STADIUM GUIDES:Estadio Azteca | Estadio Akron | Mercedes-Benz Stadium | Estadio BBVA

Group B table

Pos

Advertisement

Team

PTS

GP

W

Advertisement

L

D

GF

GA

Advertisement

GD

1.

Canada

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

2.

Advertisement

UEFA Playoff A

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

3.

Qatar

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

4.

Advertisement

Switzerland

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

The UEFA Playoff A qualifier will be either Italy, Wales, Northern Ireland, or Bosnia & Herzegovina

Group B fixtures

Date

Time (ET)

Advertisement

Match

Location

Fri, Jun. 12

3 p.m.

Advertisement

Canada vs. UEFA Playoff A winner

BMO Field (Toronto, CAN)

Sat, Jun. 13

3 p.m.

Advertisement

Qatar vs. Switzerland

Levi’s Stadium (San Francisco, CA)

Thu, Jun. 18

3 p.m.

Advertisement

UEFA Playoff A winner vs. Switzerland

SoFi Stadium (Inglewood, CA)

Thu, Jun. 18

6 p.m.

Advertisement

Canada vs. Qatar

BC Place (Vancouver, CAN)

Wed, Jun. 24

3 p.m.

Advertisement

Switzerland vs. Canada

BC Place (Vancouver, CAN)

Wed, Jun. 24

3 p.m.

Advertisement

UEFA Playoff A winner vs. Qatar

Lumen Field (Seattle, WA)

STADIUM GUIDES:BMO Field | Levi’s Stadium | SoFi Stadium | BC Place | Lumen Field

Group D table

Pos

Advertisement

Team

PTS

GP

W

Advertisement

L

D

GF

GA

Advertisement

GD

1.

United States

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

2.

Advertisement

Paraguay

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

3.

Australia

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

4.

Advertisement

UEFA Playoff C

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

The UEFA Playoff C qualifier will be either Slovakia, Turkey, Kosovo, or Romania

Group D fixtures

Date

Time (ET)

Advertisement

Match

Location

Fri, Jun. 12

9 p.m.

Advertisement

United States vs. Paraguay

SoFi Stadium (Inglewood, CA)

Sat, Jun. 13

12 a.m.

Advertisement

Australia vs. UEFA Playoff C Winner

BC Place (Vancouver, CAN)

Sat, Jun. 20

12 a.m.

Advertisement

UEFA Playoff C Winner vs. Paraguay

Levi’s Stadium (Santa Clara, CA)

Fri, Jun. 19

3 p.m.

Advertisement

United States vs. Australia

Lumen Field (Seattle, WA)

Thu, Jun. 25

10 p.m.

Advertisement

UEFA Playoff C Winner vs. United States

SoFi Stadium (Inglewood, CA)

Thu, Jun. 25

10 p.m.

Advertisement

Paraguay vs. Australia

Levi’s Stadium (Santa Clara, CA)

STADIUM GUIDES:SoFi Stadium | BC Place | Levi’s Stadium | Lumen Field

Advertisement

Advertisement

Group F table

Pos

Team

PTS

GP

Advertisement

W

L

D

GF

Advertisement

GA

GD

1.

Netherlands

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

2.

Japan

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

3.

UEFA Playoff B

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

4.

Tunisia

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

The UEFA Playoff B qualifier will be either Ukraine, Sweden, Poland, or Albania

Group F fixtures

Date

Advertisement

Time (ET)

Match

Location

Sun, Jun. 14

Advertisement

4 p.m.

Netherlands vs. Japan

AT&T Stadium (Arlington, TX)

Sun, Jun. 14

Advertisement

10 p.m.

UEFA Playoff B Winner vs. Tunisia

Estadio BBVA (Monterrey, MEX)

Sat, Jun. 20

Advertisement

1 p.m.

Tunisia vs. Japan

Estadio BBVA (Monterrey, MEX)

Sat, Jun. 20

Advertisement

12 a.m.

Netherlands vs. UEFA Playoff B Winner

NRG Stadium (Houston, TX)

Thu, Jun. 25

Advertisement

7 p.m.

Tunisia vs. Netherlands

AT&T Stadium (Arlington, TX)

Thu, Jun. 25

Advertisement

7 p.m.

Japan vs. UEFA Playoff B Winner

Arrowhead Stadium (Kansas City, MO)

Group I table

Pos

Advertisement

Team

PTS

GP

W

Advertisement

L

D

GF

GA

Advertisement

GD

1.

France

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

2.

Advertisement

Senegal

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

3.

FIFA Playoff 2

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

4.

Advertisement

Norway

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

The FIFA Intercontinental Playoff 2 qualifier will be either Iraq, Bolivia, or Suriname.

Group I fixtures

Date

Time (ET)

Advertisement

Match

Location

Tue, Jun. 16

3 p.m.

Advertisement

France vs. Senegal

MetLife Stadium (East Rutherford, NJ)

Tue, Jun. 16

6 p.m.

Advertisement

FIFA Playoff 2 Winner vs. Norway

Gillette Stadium (Foxborough, MA)

Mon, Jun. 22

5 p.m.

Advertisement

France vs. Playoff 2 Winner

Lincoln Financial Field (Philadelphia, PA)

Mon, Jun. 22

8 p.m.

Advertisement

Norway vs. Senegal

MetLife Stadium (East Rutherford, NJ)

Fri, Jun. 26

3 p.m.

Advertisement

Norway vs. France

Gillette Stadium (Foxborough, MA)

Fri, Jun. 26

3 p.m.

Advertisement

Senegal vs. FIFA Playoff 2 Winner

BMO Field (Toronto, CAN)

Group K table

Pos

Team

Advertisement

PTS

GP

W

L

Advertisement

D

GF

GA

GD

Advertisement

1.

Portugal

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

2.

FIFA Playoff 1

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

3.

Uzbekistan

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

4.

Colombia

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

0

0

0

0

Advertisement

The FIFA Intercontinental Playoff 1 qualifier will be either DR Congo, Jamaica, or New Caledonia.

Group K fixtures

Date

Time (ET)

Match

Advertisement

Location

Fri, Jun. 17

1 p.m.

Portugal vs. TBD

Advertisement

NRG Stadium (Houston, TX)

Fri, Jun. 17

10 p.m.

Uzbekistan vs. Colombia

Advertisement

Estadio Azteca (Mexico City, MEX)

Tue, Jun. 23

1 p.m.

Portugal vs. Uzbekistan

Advertisement

NRG Stadium (Houston, TX)

Tue, Jun. 23

10 p.m.

Colombia vs. TBD

Advertisement

Estadio Akron (Guadalajara, MEX)

Sat, Jun. 27

7:30 p.m.

Colombia vs. Portugal

Advertisement

Hard Rock Stadium (Miami, FL)

Sat, Jun. 27

7:30 p.m.

TBD vs. Uzbekistan

Advertisement

Mercedes-Benz Stadium (Atlanta, GA)

World Cup playoff history, past results

UEFA playoffs

UEFA has been using a playoff system since 2010, when they were removed from contention at the intercontinental playoff and broken off into their own system.

In the first iteration of the UEFA playoff, eight teams qualified and were matched up by random draw in four two-legged pairings to determine the four qualifiers. It remained this way until the 2022 cycle when it was changed to the current format.

Advertisement

Advertisement

While there were only three playoff qualifiers at in 2022, that has been moved to four with the expansion to 48 teams for the 2026 competition.

Year

Qualifier

Defeated in Final

Advertisement

2010

France

Rep. of Ireland

Portugal

Advertisement

Bosnia & Herzegovina

Greece

Ukraine

Slovenia

Advertisement

Russia

2014

Portugal

Sweden

Advertisement

France

Ukraine

Greece

Romania

Advertisement

Croatia

Iceland

2018

Switzerland

Advertisement

Northern Ireland

Croatia

Greece

Denmark

Advertisement

Rep. of Ireland

Sweden

Italy

2022

Advertisement

Wales

Ukraine

Poland

Sweden

Advertisement

Portugal

North Macedonia

Intercontinental playoffs

This is the first year that six teams will participate in the intercontinental playoff.

The first edition of the intercontinental playoff was just two teams, as Iran and Australia matched up for a two-legged playoff to determine the final World Cup participant.

Advertisement

From 2002 all the way until 2022, the intercontinental playoff saw four teams participate, pushing for two qualifying spots.

Year

Qualifier

Confederation

Advertisement

1998

Iran*

AFC

2002

Advertisement

Rep. of Ireland

UEFA

Uruguay

CONMEBOL

Advertisement

2006

Trinidad & Tobago

CONCACAF

Australia

Advertisement

OFC

2010

New Zealand

OFC

Advertisement

Uruguay

CONMEBOL

2014

Uruguay

Advertisement

CONMEBOL

Mexico

CONCACAF

2018

Advertisement

Australia

AFC

Peru

CONMEBOL

Advertisement

2022

Australia

AFC

Costa Rica

Advertisement

CONCACAF

* Progressed via away goals rule after 3-3 aggregate draw

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

Ex-Cowboys player Melvin Foster dead at 59

Published

on

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Melvin Foster, a former college football star who later became a sheriff’s deputy in Texas, has died, according to an online obituary. He was 59.

Foster was a standout linebacker with the Iowa Hawkeyes. He was on the team that won a Big Ten Championship and made a Rose Bowl appearance. He led the team in tackles during his junior and senior seasons.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Advertisement
Melvin Foster was a Harris County, Texas, sheriff's deputy for 15 years.

Melvin Foster was a Harris County, Texas, sheriff’s deputy for 15 years. (Ed Gonzalez/@SheriffEd_HCSO/X)

After his collegiate career was over, he had a brief stint with the Dallas Cowboys.

He later joined the Harris County, Texas, Sheriff’s Office as a deputy sheriff and a field training officer. He was with the department for more than a decade.

Harris County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez described Foster’s death as “unexpected.”

MICHIGAN COACH KYLE WHITTINGHAM: BRYCE UNDERWOOD IS ‘OUR CLEAR NO. 1’ QB 

Advertisement
An Iowa Hawkeyes football helmet

An Iowa Hawkeyes helmet lays on the field before a football game against the Indiana Hoosiers Sept. 27, 2025 at Kinnick Stadium in Iowa City, Iowa. (Julia Hansen/Iowa City Press-Citizen / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images)

“We’re saddened by the recent and unexpected passing of our teammate, @HCSOTexas Deputy Melvin Foster,” Gonzalez wrote on X. “Melvin was an incredible man and public servant. He leaves behind a strong legacy. He served Harris County for almost 15 years.

“Melvin played for @JackYatesHigh, Class of 1986. He played linebacker for the football team and participated in a state championship in 1985. He played college football for the @IowaFootball Hawkeyes and appeared in the Rose Bowl in 1991. He was awarded @USATODAY All-American, All-State honors.  He was a member of the @dallascowboys in 1992. He was inducted in the @HC_HSA Hall of Fame.

“He was an impactful leader and was beloved by his teammates. We extend our deepest condolences to his family. Melvin will be missed and never forgotten.”

Iowa decal in the end zone

A general view of the stadium before the ReliaQuest Bowl between the Iowa Hawkeyes and the Vanderbilt Commodores at Raymond James Stadium on Dec. 31, 2025.  (Nathan Ray Seebeck/Imagn Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Foster was remembered in his obituary as a “giving man with a big heart.”

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

WNBA, CBS Sports reach long-term media rights deal: 20 regular-season games to air during 2026 season

Published

on

reese-blackmon-getty.png
Getty Images

The WNBA and CBS Sports announced a new long-term agreement on Wednesday that expands their partnership and will feature up to 20 regular-season games annually on the CBS Television Network and Paramount+. CBS Sports will air 20 games during the upcoming 2026 season, the most ever WNBA games for the network on broadcast television. 

The deal also includes an expanded pregame, halftime and postgame show featuring Naismith Basketball Hall of Famer Lisa Leslie, former WNBA All-Star Renee Montgomery and CBS Sports reporter Jenny Dell. 

“The WNBA’s growth and cultural impact have never been stronger, and CBS Sports is proud to deepen our longstanding partnership with a league that continues to drive the evolution of women’s sports,” Dan Weinberg, the executive vice president of programming at CBS Sports, said in a statement. “With our entire schedule of games on broadcast television, we are broadening the league’s reach and amplifying the WNBA’s momentum with best-in-class coverage that reflects the excellence of its athletes and resonates with fans.”

Jordan Kent (play-by-play), Isis “Ice” Young (analyst) and Tiffany Blackmon (sideline) will return as the WNBA on CBS’s lead broadcast team. 

“The WNBA Tip Off Show,” led by Leslie, Montgomery and Dell, will expand to support 10 games, including six shows on CBS and Paramount+ and four digital-exclusive editions on CBS Sports HQ

Advertisement

The full 2026 WNBA on CBS schedule will be announced at a later date.

The 2026 WNBA season will proceed as scheduled after the league and the Women’s National Basketball Players Association came to terms on a new collective bargaining agreement earlier this month. The term sheet was recently ratified by both the WNBA’s board of governors and the players’ union. 

Advertisement

The 2026 WNBA season will begin May 8, and the 44-game regular season will run through Sept. 24, with a late-season break for the 2026 FIBA Women’s World Cup from Sept. 1-16. The 2026 playoffs will begin on Sept. 27. Two new expansion franchises, the Portland Fire and Toronto Tempo, will join the league this year, bringing the total number of teams to 15. 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Darius Acuff Jr. is dominating March but NBA Draft questions remain

Published

on

Darius Acuff Jr. is no stranger to making history. This season, the 19-year-old Arkansas point guard became the first player to lead the SEC in both points and assists since Pete Maravich in 1970, and third to win both freshman and player of the year. 

Indeed, pretty much everything about Acuff screams superstar. He’s more than an electric basketball player. There’s an icy cool charisma to him — the kind Reebok believes is ready to be the face of a franchise, as the company announced on Tuesday that it has signed Acuff to a signature shoe deal (meaning he will have his own shoe when he takes the court for his first NBA game), marking the first time that has ever happened for a male athlete that is still in college. 

Anyone who gets the “HIM” endorsement from Allen Iverson is true-hooper stamped, but a necessary caveat is that it is Iverson’s jojb to sell the world on Acuff’s impending stardom. He’s Reebok’s vice president of basketball. For now, this is just marketing. There are no guarantees. What kind of actual NBA player Acuff turns out to be, both in the short and long term, remains to be seen. 

And that’s where this gets interesting. Or, if you’re the team that ends up drafting Acuff with a top-five pick, potentially dangerous. Acuff represents what has become the league’s most precarious positional archetype: The small, score-first point guard who can’t defend. 

Advertisement

Now, before we go any further, a couple disclaimers. First, Acuff isn’t that small. He’s listed anywhere from 6-foot-2 to 6-foot-3, and at 190 pounds he’s built like an old-school SEC running back — his sturdy frame and straight-line strength is actually one of his most devastating attributes, at least against college players. Yes, he’ll be undersized in a lot of NBA point guard matchups, but so is Jalen Brunson, who one league scout told CBS Sports is one of Acuff’s better NBA comps. 

“If you’re going with the more high-end outcomes [for Acuff’s career], I suppose there’s some Damian Lillard in there. Maybe a bigger, stronger Keyonte George on a little bit of the lower end,” the Western Conference scout said, noting the “natural fade” to a lot of Acuff’s midrange pull-ups that remind him of George. 

“But yeah, I think Brunson is a probably a good example [of what Acuff can become], just with the way they use their leverage; they get you on their hip, get that shoulder into you, and from there you can’t get them off their line. … Remember, nobody projected Brunson to become what he has. We said the same things, right? Too small. How’s he gonna guard? But there’s no backdown in that guy. … It’s hard to go wrong betting on those kinds of guys.”

Indeed, Brunson is an interesting comp for Acuff — not just for the size and skill similarities (Acuff is a better athlete) but through the prism of defensive deficiency. Even as great as Brunson is offensively, there’s still a question as to whether he can be the best player on a championship team as a weak-link defender, even as the Knicks have tried to insulate him with long wings and rim protection. 

Which brings us to the second disclaimer: we don’t know that Acuff can’t defend. We only know that he hasn’t chosen to yet. 

Advertisement

It’s partly, if not largely, an awareness issue on tape — he can look like a chicken with his head cut off away from the ball. But in theory, he has the athleticism and physicality to pull his weight. Maybe he’ll figure it out in the NBA. So far, the evidence is not terribly encouraging. 

Last Saturday, Acuff had absolutely no chance of staying in front of High Point point guard Rob Martin, but neither did anyone else. Martin is a human bullet. You give that guy a head of steam and 90% of defenders, even NBA ones, are going to become a billboard on an F1 track. 

Again, it was the effort and focus lapses that stood out. Acuff’s screen navigation is a real problem. The want-to just isn’t there. He’s too content to fall out of the play, which wouldn’t seem to be in keeping with all the “tough competitor” praise he gets. Watch here as he takes the scenic route around two picks on which he isn’t even touched, just to lazily trail from behind as Martin cruises in for a layup. 

Even when Acuff did manage to stay attached to Martin, he still got powered through at the rim by a guy who is generously listed at 5-foot-10 and 170 pounds. 

Advertisement

The flip side to this, of course, is that like Brunson, Acuff gives it right back to you — and then some — on the offensive end. He put 36 on High Point. Scored 12 of Arkansas’ final 15 points. Turned a tie game with three minutes to play into a 90-83 lead with a personal 7-0 run. The clutch gene is evident. You can’t teach it. Acuff has it. 

Through two NCAA tournament games, Acuff has racked up 60 points and 13 assists. Chris Paul is the only other freshman since 1973 to open his NCAA Tournament career with consecutive 20-point/5-assist games. There would appear to be almost no doubt that Acuff is going to be an offensive weapon at the next level, perhaps even a deadly one. 

🏀 Darius Acuff Jr.’s sizzling NCAA Tournament

Stat / Feat Context
36 points vs. High Point Second-most by a frosh in NCAA tourney history (De’Aaron Fox, 39)
60 points through first two NCAA Tournament games Most ever by a freshman through two tournament games
30+ PPG, 5+ APG through two games First player to hit those marks since Jimmer Fredette in 2011
Multiple 20+ point, 5+ assist games Joins Chris Paul (2004) and Derrick Rose (08) as only frosh to do it

The NBA, generally speaking, does not value this type of one-way player — particularly as the face of a franchise — the way it did even five years ago. Trae Young’s outsized salary just got dumped. Nobody wants to touch Ja Morant. It’s hard to imagine any team paying Tyler Herro $130 million today, but in 2022 the Heat did. 

Advertisement

Even closer to the roster margins, teams are largely moving away from one-way scorers who bring little else to the table. Cam Thomas is a walking bucket and he just got waived by the Bucks. Jordan Poole has averaged 20 points per game over a season two times and is basically a castoff. Jonathan Kuminga dominated playoff games as a scorer, yet could hardly crack Steve Kerr’s rotation before he was shipped to the Hawks. Collin Sexton was an elite scorer in college and has remained a very good one in the NBA, and nobody is handing him the keys to their team. 

There are exceptions. If your name is Luka Dončić, Stephen Curry, Donovan Mitchell, prime James Harden or Lillard, or certainly the aforementioned Brunson, a lot of these size and/or defensive flaws will be tolerated. It begs the question: Is Acuff’s offense that great? 

“[It] has a chance to be, in my opinion,” a separate scout told CBS Sports. “It’s not just because of what he does with the ball, but he can [play] off it, too. That’s become so important. I mean look around, how many teams do you see playing that Luka style anymore, where you’re just giving it to one guy and letting him play pick and roll all game long? It’s not many.”

It’s true. Context matters. You’re a lot more exposed as a defensive liability when you’re the face of a team, especially right out of the gate. Keyonte George has it easier than Trae Young did in Atlanta. George isn’t the best player in Utah. At best, he’ll be the third-best player next year. Plus, the Jazz have built their roster to insulate him with bigs everywhere, trading for Jaren Jackson Jr. to put alongside Walker Kessler and Lauri Markannen. And George, an electric scorer, still might be a problem when they start trying to win games. Maybe we’ll find out next year. It’s an interesting litmus test. 

Advertisement

For Acuff, a situation like Dallas would be perfect. He wouldn’t be the best player on the team (that would be Cooper Flagg), and Kyrie Irving would allow him to ease into his career in the same way that De’Aaron Fox is doing for Dylan Harper, the second overall pick in 2025, in San Antonio. 

CBS Sports lead draft scout Adam Finkelstein has Acuff going in the six to eight range, which is Jazz/Mavericks/Grizzlies/Hawks territory. Would the Jazz put Acuff alongside George, or take him with the plan to move George? The Hawks have a good shot at a mid-lottery pick, too (via New Orleans’ or Milwaukee’s pick), but would they make another bet on a player like Acuff after just having punted on Young? Maybe. Maybe not. Every organization is looking out a different window. 

“You try not to put a lot of stock in these generic prototypes, as far as where the league is going or what kinds of players are en vogue at whatever moment,” one Western Conference exec told CBS Sports. “It wasn’t that long ago that centers were supposed to be dying. Everyone was going small. Now everyone is looking for size again. … You really have to just go case by case. What’s good for one team might not be a fit for another. Do the strengths outweigh the weaknesses? And then, can the weaknesses be improved?”

Ah, the improvement card. It’s always a popular one to play around draft time. If you took a shot of tequila every time some analyst said the words “he needs to improve his shooting” on draft night, you’d be in the back of an ambulance before the end of the first round. 

For years this led teams to use lottery picks on the likes of Michael Carter-Williams, Elfrid Payton, Kris Dunn, Emmanuel Mudiay, Ricky Rubio, Dante Exum and Frank Ntilikina — all on the assumption that their shooting would meaningfully improve. Not one of them ever made an All-Star team. 

Advertisement
Acuff’s lack of defensive want-to is excusable in college, but will he be pressed to change in the NBA?
Getty Images

It’s not to say improvement can’t happen. Of course it can. In this regard, defense, to whatever degree your size allows, is no different than any other skill. Ben Simmons didn’t give a damn about defense in college, but in the NBA he became the portrait of modern versatility before flaming out of the league for just about every reason other than defense. 

Go talk to Darren Erman about Klay Thompson. Erman was an assistant with the Warriors when Thompson came up, and he’ll tell you all the stories you want about Thompson going into the gym and working out for hours without a ball, working on his defense, his movement, his technique, anything and everything until he became one of the league’s best perimeter defenders. 

Acuff doesn’t have the size of a Simmons or Thompson, but he can get better if he wants to. Curry did it. You better believe a lot of GMs are trying to make as educated a guess as possible as to whether Acuff will do the same. Like us, they’ll be watching closely when Acuff squares up against top-seeded Arizona, which has NBA players all over, in the Sweet Sixteen on Thursday night. 

If his defense is a wreck and the Razorbacks get spanked, will it hurt his draft stock? If he balls out and leads Arkansas into the Elite Eight, will it rise even more than it already has? It’s easy to say teams evaluate the big picture over a small sample of big-stage showings, but evidence often speaks to the contrary. Showing out in the tourney can, and does, influence even the most unemotional of evaluators. 

Advertisement

Acuff dropped 36 on High Point, second-most by a freshman in NCAA Tournament history. 
Getty Images

Sometimes knocking a your marquee audition out of the park proves to be a predictor of NBA success, as was the case with Curry and Brunson, even a Kemba Walker, to name a few tournament darlings. But for every one of those guys, there’s a Trey Burke. A Shabazz Napier. Small guys who were big-time college point guards and showed out in the tourney but never panned out in the NBA. 

Acuff is almost certainly going to pan out on some level. It’s impossible to imagine him being a full-on bust. But we’re talking degrees here. He’s probably going to go in the top 10, with the expectation that he will someday soon be not just a statistical darling but an actual star who can influence winning. Those are two very different things and the league is now starkly differentiating between the two. 

Which one will Acuff become? Who knows. He’s only 19-years-old. Everything is on the table. His lack of interest in playing defense is a red flag. Ultimately he will have to either fix it or find a way to be so great on offense that the defense does not matter. One team this June is going to make a huge bet Acuff can swing one of the two outcomes. It would be a lot of fun if he could do both. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Shubman Gill joins criticism of Impact Player rule, says ‘It takes the skill out’ | Cricket News

Published

on

Shubman Gill joins criticism of Impact Player rule, says ‘It takes the skill out’
Gujarat Titans’ captain Shubman Gill (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki)

Gujarat Titans captain Shubman Gill has joined the growing list of Indian players voicing concerns over the Impact Player rule in the Indian Premier League, stating that it “takes the skill out of the game.” Gill’s remarks come shortly after similar criticism from players like Rohit Sharma, Hardik Pandya and Axar Patel. During the IPL captains’ meeting held in Mumbai, a majority of team leaders, including Gill, reportedly pushed for a review of the rule, which was first introduced by the BCCI in 2023 and has since been extended until at least 2027. Speaking a day after the meeting, Gill was clear in his stance against the regulation, which allows teams to introduce an extra batter or bowler at any point during a match. “Personally for me, I don’t think there should be an impact player. I think cricket in general is an 11 players’ game and on wickets where we play on the grounds that we play, adding an extra batsman is I think it takes the skill out of the game,” Gill said. He further explained that the traditional balance of the sport is being affected, especially in pressure situations where teams are expected to adapt with limited resources. “There’s a certain skill in the game that you need to have. When you have a certain amount of batters and if a couple of your batters get out, there’s an amount of skill that you need to have to still get the scoreboard moving and get your team to a good score.” Gill also argued that the rule is making matches more predictable and less competitive, particularly on batting-friendly surfaces. “With that one extra player, it’s making the game more one-dimensional and it’s taking a little bit of the skill out of the game. Chasing 180 on a challenging wicket or 160 on a challenging wicket is for me, it’s personally way more exciting than chasing 220 on a flat wicket,” he added. Despite the criticism from several players, the rule is set to remain in place for the foreseeable future, with any potential review expected only after the 2027 season. “It’s gonna be there till 2027. It’s something that we also spoke about in the captain’s meeting yesterday. I understand it makes the game a bit more entertaining, but let’s see. It’s there. It’s up to them what the BCCI is going to do, they’re gonna take their decision, but personally I don’t like it,” Gill said.

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

MLB news: Yankees’ José Caballero makes history with first-ever ABS challenge

Published

on

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

New York Yankees shortstop José Caballero made MLB history Wednesday: He became the first player to use the Automated Ball-Strike System (ABS).

During the fourth inning of the Yankees’ 7-0 Opening Day win over the San Francisco Giants at Oracle Park, Caballero challenged home plate umpire Bill Miller’s strike call after Giants starting pitcher Logan Webb threw a sinker at the top of the zone.

Caballero, 29, tapped his head to initiate the challenge and appeal the strike call, but lost the challenge. The 12 Hawk-Eye cameras of the Automated Ball-Strike System displayed that Webb’s 90.7 mph sinker was in the zone.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

José Caballero runs to first base

José Caballero (72) of the New York Yankees runs to first after hitting a one-run double in the second inning during the game between the New York Yankees and the San Francisco Giants at Oracle Park in San Francisco, California, on March 25, 2026. (Mary DeCicco/MLB Photos via Getty Images)

Despite losing the challenge, he had conviction in his decision.

“Nope, I wanted to go for it,” Caballero said.

Caballero thought it was a little higher than what was shown, but he is a fan of the ABS system despite his unsuccessful appeal.

Advertisement

“I think it’s really good, keep everyone accountable,” he added. “It gives us a chance to really see how good (we are) with the zone or not. I wish it was the other way around, I’m trying to get the overturn call but this time I didn’t.”

BASEBALL HALL OF FAME PITCHER GOES IN DEPTH HOW ABS SYSTEM WILL IMPROVE OFFENSE, HOW ARMS HAVE TO ADJUST

José Caballero celebrates run

Jazz Chisholm Jr., left, and José Caballero, right, of the New York Yankees are congratulated by Austin Wells (28) after both scored on Ryan McMahon’s two-run single against the San Francisco Giants during the second inning of a baseball game in San Francisco, California, on March 25, 2026. (Jeff Chiu/AP Photo)

Caballero’s challenge was the lone one of the game. The Yankees were up 5-0 at the time of the challenge.

Yankees manager Aaron Boone said he has tried to be direct with the feedback he has given to players regarding their challenges.

Advertisement

“We’ve had a lot of dialogue at it. It’s something that we’ve poured a lot into, I’ve certainly,” Boone said. “It’s become one of the things I’ve kind of tried to lead the charge on a little bit. Another kind of end-of-spring meeting with all the position players and catchers at the end just kind of running through different ones that came up and give my feedback on it. I’ve been very direct with them during spring as far as after the fact if I thought one was really good or conversely if one was terrible.”

“I’ve tried to be real direct with them and why,” he said. “I feel like we’re going to be good at it, that’s the expectation. I’m sure we’ll continue to evolve with it.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

José Caballero throws to first

New York Yankees shortstop José Caballero (72) throws the ball to first to record an out against the San Francisco Giants in the ninth inning at Oracle Park in San Francisco, California, on March 25, 2026. (Cary Edmondson/Imagn Images)

Teams are given two challenges a game, but if they successfully challenge a call, they retain it. But if the challenge is unsuccessful, you lose it. So, the Yankees were down to one challenge for the rest of game after Caballero’s unsuccessful attempt in the fourth inning.

Advertisement

Caballero, who went 1 for 4 with an RBI and a run scored, drove in the first run of the 2026 MLB season with a single that scored Giancarlo Stanton in the second inning.

The Yankees (1-0) will look to continue their hot start when they take on the Giants (0-1) on Friday at 4:35 p.m. ET.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Women’s Olympic sports limited to biological females from 2028 – IOC

Published

on

In recent years a growing number of sports federations, including World Aquatics and World Athletics, have barred athletes who have undergone male puberty from competing in elite female competition amid concerns over fairness and safety.

Last May the Football Association and England and Wales Cricket Board were among a number of British sports bodies to follow suit after the UK Supreme Court’s ruling that the legal definition of a woman was based on biological sex.

The moves have been opposed by trans rights campaigners who argue they could violate human rights, and insist inclusion should be prioritised.

However, this year US President Donald Trump signed an executive order that prevents transgender women from competing in female categories.

Advertisement

He said it would include the 2028 Olympics and that he would deny visas for transgender athletes trying to visit the US to compete at the Games.

New Zealand’s Laurel Hubbard became the first openly transgender women to compete at an Olympics after being selected for the women’s weightlifting team at Tokyo 2020.

The Paris 2024 Olympics were engulfed in controversy after Algeria’s Imane Khelif won the women’s welterweight boxing gold medal, a year after being disqualified from the World Championships for reportedly failing a gender eligibility test.

The IOC cleared the 25-year-old to compete, along with Taiwan’s Lin Yu-ting, who was also banned by the suspended International Boxing Association (IBA).

Advertisement

The IOC said competitors were eligible for the women’s division if their passports said they were female.

Some reports took the IBA saying Khelif has XY chromosomes to speculate that the fighter might have DSD. However, the BBC was not able to confirm whether this was or was not the case.

Last week it was announced that Lin could return to women’s sport after passing a sex test.

At the 2016 Olympics in Rio, all three medallists in the women’s 800m, including winner Semenya, were DSD athletes, intensifying calls for tighter rules.

Advertisement

World Athletics then insisted that for track events from 400m up to the mile, DSD athletes must reduce their testosterone levels in order to be eligible.

Semenya refused, arguing it was an infringement of her human rights and discriminatory.

Amid a long legal battle, World Athletics’ made its rules stricter in 2023.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Transgender women athletes banned from Olympics by new IOC policy

Published

on

GENEVA — Transgender women athletes are now excluded from women’s events at the Olympics after the IOC agreed to a new eligibility policy on Thursday which aligns with U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive order on sports ahead of the 2028 Los Angeles Games.

“Eligibility for any female category event at the Olympic Games or any other IOC event, including individual and team sports, is now limited to biological females,” the International Olympic Committee said, to be determined by a mandatory gene test once in an athlete’s career.

It is unclear how many, if any, transgender women are competing at an Olympic level. No woman who transitioned from being born male competed at the 2024 Paris Summer Games, though weightlifter Laurel Hubbard did at the Tokyo Olympics in 2021 without winning a medal. 

The eligibility policy that will apply from the LA Olympics in July 2028 “protects fairness, safety and integrity in the female category,” the IOC said.

Advertisement

“It is not retroactive and does not apply to any grassroots or recreational sports programs,” said the IOC, whose Olympic Charter states that access to play sport is a human right.

After an executive board meeting, the International Olympic Committee published a 10-page policy document which also restricts female athletes such as two-time Olympic champion runner Caster Semenya with medical conditions known as differences in sex development, or DSD. 

The IOC and its president, Kirsty Coventry, have wanted a clear policy instead of continuing to advise sports’ governing bodies who previously have drafted their own rules.

“At the Olympic Games, even the smallest margins can be the difference between victory and defeat,” Coventry, a two-time Olympic gold medalist in swimming, said in a statement. “So, it is absolutely clear that it would not be fair for biological males to compete in the female category.”

Advertisement

She set up a review of “protecting the female category” as one of her first big decisions last June as the first woman to lead the Olympic body in its 132-year history.

Female eligibility was a strong theme in a seven-candidate IOC election last year — held after a furor around women’s boxing in Paris — when Coventry’s main rivals pledged a stronger policy to leading on the issue.

Before the 2024 Paris Olympics, three top-tier sports — track and field, swimming and cycling — excluded transgender women who had been through male puberty. Semenya, who was assigned female at birth in South Africa and has high natural testosterone levels, won a European Court of Human Rights judgment in her years-long legal challenge to track and field’s rules which did not overturn them.

The IOC document details its research that being born male gives physical advantages that a working group of experts believes are retained.

Advertisement

“Males experience three significant testosterone peaks: In utero, in mini-puberty of infancy and beginning in adolescent puberty through adulthood,” the document said.

It added this gives males “individual sex-based performance advantages in sports and events that rely on strength, power and/or endurance.”

The IOC said its expert group agreed the current gene test is “the most accurate and least intrusive method currently available.” It screened for “the SRY gene, a segment of DNA typically found on the Y chromosome that initiates male sex development in utero and indicates the presence of testes/testicles.”

Still, the mandatory gender screening — already conducted by the governing bodies of track and field, skiing and boxing — is likely to be criticized by human rights experts and activist groups.

Advertisement

One of the two women’s boxing gold medalists at the center of the gender controversy in Paris, Lin Yu-ting of Taiwan, has passed her gene test and can return to competition, the World Boxing governing body said last week.

In the U.S., President Trump signed the executive order “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports” in February last year, and pledged to deny visas to some athletes attempting to compete at the L.A Olympics. The order also threatened to “rescind all funds” from organizations that allowed transgender athletes to take part in women’s sports.

Within months the U.S. Olympic body updated its guidance to national sports bodies citing an obligation to comply with the White House.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Bencic dominates Anisimova to reach Miami Quarterfinal

Published

on

Belinda Bencic delivered a commanding performance at the Miami Open 2026, defeating Amanda Anisimova 6–2, 6–2 to reach the quarterfinals.

It is her second Miami quarterfinal appearance and her first since 2022.

Bencic controlled the match from start to finish, using precise groundstrokes to take time away from one of the tour’s most powerful hitters.

  • Gauff’s Tweet tactic sparks Sabalenka reactionGauff’s Tweet tactic sparks Sabalenka reaction

Advertisement

The win also marks:
her 41st career Top 10 victory
her third Top 10 win of the 2026 season

She continues to build strong form as the tournament progresses.

Off the court, Bencic also shared a lighter moment with Jannik Sinner, who was playing football with her daughter:

Advertisement

“It was so sweet. Jannik is very sweet to her. She’s very skeptical of everyone. I hope later she can realize who was talking to her.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

McLaughlin: Outlook for coaches at Utah, BYU & Colorado

Published

on

Big Ten logo

Indiana should go into the 2026 season as the preseason No. 1 team in college football after landing QB Josh Hoover out of the portal from TCU.

Plus, Curt Cignetti still has the best staff in the country.

On today’s episode of Locked On College Football, Spencer McLaughlin and ‘Locked On Bama’ host Luke Robinson discuss the Crimson Tide’s ongoing QB battle in Tuscaloosa.

Does Austin Mack have a built-in advantage over Keelon Russell?

Advertisement

Colorado Buffaloes logoColorado enters 2026 with some pressure on Deion Sanders to win, aided by new OC Brennan Marion.

‘Locked On Buffs’ host Kevin Borba shares thoughts on his conversation with Colorado’s new playcaller.

05:42 Hoover’s Potential and Playoff Expectations
06:44 “Josh Hoover Stands Out
17:34 Alabama QB Battle Breakdown
22:32 Patience Pays Off in Football
28:34 Deion Sanders & Colorado’s Future
30:35 Coach Criticized for Job Success
33:45 Utah, BYU, Colorado Coaching Outlook

/ @lockedoncollegefootball  

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Jonah Coleman Enters the Chat for Vikings

Published

on

Advertisement

Jonah Coleman runs with the ball during a game against the Maryland Terrapins.
Washington Huskies running back Jonah Coleman (1) carries the ball through traffic, pushing upfield against the Maryland defense on Oct. 4, 2025, at SECU Stadium in College Park as the Huskies leaned on their ground game during a competitive matchup. Mandatory Credit: Jamie Sabau-Imagn Images.

Are you ready for the Minnesota Vikings to draft a dynamic young running back for the first time in eons? The club took a step in the right direction this week, meeting with rookie tailback Jonah Coleman.

The Vikings keep doing homework on this deep 2026 running back class, and that is excellent.

Coleman is considered the third- or fourth-best running back in this year’s class, and there’s a small chance that he transfers his purple uniform from Washington to Minnesota.

Advertisement

Coleman Fits Minnesota’s Search for Backfield Juice

The Vikings have nine draft picks in 2026.

Jonah Coleman runs with the ball during a game against the Maryland Terrapins. Jonah Coleman Vikings
Washington Huskies running back Jonah Coleman (1) carries the ball through the defense, working upfield against Maryland on Oct. 4, 2025, at SECU Stadium in College Park as the Huskies leaned on their rushing attack during a competitive road matchup. Mandatory Credit: Jamie Sabau-Imagn Images.

Vikings Meet with Coleman

In all likelihood, the Vikings will draft a halfback somewhere in April’s draft, and the franchise now has a meeting with Coleman on record.

SI.com‘s Will Ragatz wrote this week, “The Vikings will host Coleman on a Top 30 visit, per Arye Pulli. The former Arizona and Washington standout has recorded over 1,100 yards from scrimmage in each of the last three seasons and scored 27 touchdowns in 25 games for the Huskies.”

Advertisement

“He’s been an efficient college runner who can also catch the ball (87 career receptions) and pass protect. There’s a lot to like about Coleman, but he’s also undersized at 5’9″ and isn’t particularly explosive.”

At the moment, Coleman is projected as a 3rd-Round pick, and Minnesota has two of those in the chamber.

A Superb Landing Spot

In Minnesota — if the Vikings press the button on Coleman — he’ll strut into a wonderful situation, not oozing with the pressure of an immediate RB1. The Vikings have Jordan Mason and Aaron Jones back in 2026, and they figure to take the bulk of rushing attempts next year if healthy.

Advertisement

With a man like Coleman, he can mature for a season as the RB3, be promoted to RB2 if an injury emerges — it probably will — or win the RB1 job outright if he’s that damn effective at training camp and in the preseason.

Coleman will also have offensive teammates as weapons, including Kyler Murray, Justin Jefferson, Jordan Addison, T.J. Hockenson, and the aforementioned running backs. The spot is ideal for Coleman, and he might be ideal for the Vikings.

The Green Bay Packers could give Coleman a peek, as well.

Zone Coverage‘s Mitch Widmeier on Coleman to Green Bay: “A true three-down back with the Huskies, Coleman could be an every-down back if he reaches his ceiling in the NFL. For Green Bay specifically, two things stand out. Coleman had a grand total of two fumbles in 551 career rushing attempts. That covers two years with Arizona and another two with Washington. Coleman protects the football as well as any college running back has in the last four years.”

Advertisement

“If you want to play running back in Green Bay, you need to protect the rock, have some capability to pass block, and possess a certain level of character. Check, check, and check. Coleman could be selected as early as Round 2, or he could fall into Round 4. If nobody selects him in the second round, he will be an awfully tempting option for Green Bay.

Coleman’s Scouting Report

Coleman is 5’8″, 220 pounds, has 4.5 speed, and has a style similar to Ray Rice from the Baltimore Ravens (without the spotty reputation) 15 years ago. He can catch the ball out of the backfield, and he scored 27 touchdowns at Washington in the last two years.

NFL Draft Buzz on Coleman’s rookie profile: “Coleman is not going to test his way into a higher draft slot, and his game does not need him to. His vision between the tackles finds creases before they fully develop, and his patience within zone schemes lets linemen finish their work before he commits.”

Advertisement

“He averaged over five yards per carry in 2024 behind an offensive line ranked 105th nationally in run-blocking grade, which speaks louder than any combine drill. Zone-heavy offenses are the natural fit. Where Coleman separates from other power backs in this class is ball security paired with receiving ability. One fumble across 396 career touches keeps you on the field in December.”

Jonah Coleman walks toward the locker room after a game against UC Davis. Jonah Coleman Vikings
Washington Huskies running back Jonah Coleman (1) heads toward the locker room after the final whistle, leaving the field following a win over UC Davis on Sep. 6, 2025, at Husky Stadium in Seattle as Washington wrapped up its opening-week victory. Mandatory Credit: Joe Nicholson-Imagn Images.

Power backs who can act as receivers are somewhat rare.

NDB added, “He caught 31 passes for 354 yards in 2025 and looked comfortable on underneath routes, giving coordinators the option of leaving him in on passing downs. Pass protection needs refinement; he brings effort against blitzers but his technique is still developing.”

“His floor is a reliable early-down grinder who handles 15 to 20 touches and controls tempo without putting the ball on the ground. His ceiling is a three-down back in a system that values patience over home-run speed.”

The Alternatives

Advertisement

Assume the Vikings want a rookie running back, Notre Dame’s Jeremiyah Love isn’t available, and a different team picks Coleman. These would be the options before the end of Round 5:

  • Jadarian Price (Notre Dame)
  • Mike Washington Jr. (Arkansas)
  • Emmett Johnson (Nebraska)
  • Nick Singleton (Penn State)
  • Kaytron Allen (Penn State)
  • Demond Claiborne (Wake Forest)
Jonah Coleman rushes with the ball during a game against UC Davis. Jonah Coleman Vikings
Washington Huskies running back Jonah Coleman (1) takes a handoff and pushes forward during first-quarter action, attacking the defense against UC Davis on Sep. 6, 2025, at Husky Stadium in Seattle as Washington established its ground game early. Mandatory Credit: Joe Nicholson-Imagn Images.

The Vikings have also formally met with Johnson from Nebraska and Claiborne of Wake Forest.

Coleman will turn 23 in August. Minnesota hasn’t drafted a game-changing running back since Dalvin Cook, and that was nine years ago.


avatar

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025