In less than four weeks, Derek Chisora and Deontay Wilder will step into the ring for their landmark 50th professional bouts.

Ahead of the fight, Tony Bellew has provided his prediction, where he believes one man will go through the other ‘like a knife through butter’.

A two-time world title challenger, Chisora’s recent string of victories has seen him rise the rankings and and come close to a possible third shot at the heavyweight crown, with belts expected to soon fragment.

Yet, Chisora has maintained that he will retire after his showdown with ‘The Bronze Bomber’ next month, promising to hang up the gloves after a near two-decade long career.

Although, in an interview with First Round Boxing, Chisora’s good friend and fellow British boxing fan-favourite, Bellew, believes ‘Del Boy’ will not walk away from the sport following his dust-up with Wilder.

“No, I don’t think it is [his last fight]. I don’t think that he will ever retire from boxing. Boxing will retire that lunatic, he won’t retire from boxing, which is sad.”

As for the fight itself, Bellew admitted that he would have been concerned if the fight was made a few years prior, but that he now favours Chisora over the American, due to his superior hunger and will to win.

“If this fight would have been made three or four years ago, it would have probably caused murder.

But, at this stage now, I think that he [Derek] will come through a few dodgy moments in the first couple of rounds and then he will go right through him [Wilder], like a knife through butter, in the second half of the fight.

Advertisement

“Wilder is always going to have that punch, but I just don’t believe that he actually wants it, the way that Del wants it. I think that has been apparent in his last few fights.”

Wilder-Chisora takes place on Saturday, April 4, at the O2 Arena in London, and will be available to watch live on DAZN PPV.

Scottie Scheffler has a little reminder for those who might be worried about his slow starts.

But before we get to that, here’s a refresher: Scheffler, the top golfer on the planet, has a victory and finished in the top 12 in all four of his starts this season. That’s pretty good for anyone, but what’s peculiar for him is that, save for his victory at the American Express in his first start of the year, he’s opened the last three tournaments with 74, 72 and 73 in the first rounds.

Very un-Scottie Scheffler-like. And those rough opening rounds have been just enough to keep him out of the winner’s circle. He’s tied for 117th in first-round scoring average this season (70.50), trailing Chris Gotterup by about five full shots (65.80).

This week, Scheffler is back at Bay Hill Club & Lodge in Orlando, Fla., for the Arnold Palmer Invitational, a tournament he’s won twice and never finished worse than 15th. On Wednesday, he was asked about those slow starts and if there’s anything he might do differently pre-round to fix them. This is where he offered a reality check.

“Last year on Tour I led the Tour in first-round, second-round, third-round and fourth-round scoring,” he said. “So I’m not too concerned over a very small sample size.”

He’s right! How quickly we forget.

In fact, Scheffler’s opening rounds have been where he’s at his best. His scoring average in the first round last year (67.45) was better than his Tour-leading averages in the second (68.0), third (68.40) and fourth (68.10) rounds.

Go back another season and he led the Tour in scoring average in the first (67.84) and second (67.53) rounds in 2024. And then turn back the clock one more year, to 2023, and his 67.91 first-round scoring average also led the Tour.

So to recap: should we really worry about the guy who has played better opening rounds than anyone else in each of the past three years? Probably not.

“When you look at the body of work for me this year, I played four tournaments, so that’s 16 rounds,” Scheffler said. “And I’ve always been a guy that’s been really good at staying in the present, doing what I need to do in order to go out and play well. And so at 16 rounds I’ve had 13 that have been really solid and three that haven’t been as good. So I’m still batting at a pretty nice percentage. And so if I wanted to dig deep into it I could completely change how I approach tournaments, but I don’t think that would be very wise.”

Scheffler begins his opening round at 10:20 a.m. ET on Thursday alongside Russell Henley, meaning we are less than 24 hours away from finding out if Scheffler is about to ditch the trend he’s really not worried about in the first place.

Team India at Wankhede stadium (PTI Photo)

NEW DELHI: The defending champions India take on England at Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai on Thursday in the second semi-final of the ongoing ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026. The winner of the contest will then face New Zealand in the summit clash in Ahmedabad on Sunday, after the Kiwis defeated South Africa by nine wickets in the first semi-final in Kolkata on Wednesday.Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW!While the weather forecast currently looks clear, fans remain cautious after two earlier matches in the tournament were washed out due to rain, raising concerns about what could happen if the weather disrupts the knockout match.

To prevent chaos in the crucial stage, the International Cricket Council has scheduled a reserve day for both semi-finals. If rain or bad weather stops play on the scheduled day, the match will either continue or restart on the following day, ensuring that every effort is made to produce a result.There is also additional time built into the playing schedule. The semi-finals have up to 90 minutes of extra time on the main day, while the reserve day allows up to 120 minutes of extra play if required. For the final, both the main day and the reserve day have 120 minutes of additional time available to complete the match.

Mumbai Weather Forecast at Match Time Today

For a valid result to be declared, each team must bat at least 10 overs. If rain prevents that from happening on the main day, the match will resume on the reserve day from the exact point where it stopped rather than starting from scratch.However, if the game still cannot be completed even after the reserve day, the rules favour the team that finished higher in the Super 8 stage. This scenario could prove tricky for India. India finished second in their Super 8 group, while England topped theirs with three wins.That means if the India versus England semi-final is completely washed out, England would advance to the final. The tournament final is scheduled for March 8 in Ahmedabad, with March 9 kept as the reserve day.

Mandatory testing introduced last year to verify the sex of track and field athletes has been branded a “backwards step” and a “harmful anachronism” by a group of academics.

World Athletics implemented testing for the SRY gene last September, a measure designed to ensure that only biologically female athletes can compete in the female category at the elite level.

The governing body’s president, Sebastian Coe, stated at the time that the decision was taken to “protect and promote the integrity of women’s sport”.

However, 34 academics have now sharply criticised the testing in a report submitted to the British Journal of Sports Medicine and shared with the Press Association.

open image in gallery

Advertisement

The group, which includes Professor Alun Williams from the Manchester Metropolitan University Institute for Performance Research, argues that the testing violates athletes’ human rights and risks creating significant stigma and psychological distress.

“These new regulations are an anachronism, and a harmful one,” the report authors wrote.

“They are a simplistic way of reducing a characteristic to a single gene, which does not reflect the complex nature of sex, and is couched in narratives of protecting the sanctity of fair competition in the women’s category that are not based in science and need to be challenged.”

The report further highlights an absence of robust data demonstrating that the presence of the SRY gene in individuals with a difference in sexual development (DSD) directly correlates with athletic performance advantages.

Professor Williams added separately: “There are already stigma and shame to people both inside and outside of sport arising from these regulations, and these consequences cannot be considered proportionate to the objective pursued by World Athletics.

“The longevity of the new regulations will probably be determined in court, but not before subjecting women and girl athletes to foreseeable and unjustifiable harm.”

The report also challenges World Athletics’ implication that genetic tests are straightforward, easy to administer, preserve dignity and privacy, and maintain confidentiality.

“These ostensibly reassuring words ignore the practical challenges, legal constraints, and huge ethical problems of implementing such tests across 214 member federations,” the report concluded.

In response, a spokesperson for World Athletics defended the policy, stating: “Biological men competing against biological women violates the human rights of thousands of female athletes who have the right to compete on a fair and level playing field. The expansive research on the performance advantage of biological men in sport is unequivocal.”

open image in gallery

They added: “All athletes competing in the female category at the World Athletics Championships in Tokyo last year successfully took a once-in-a-lifetime low-invasive SRY test – an excellent example of global co-operation among our 214 member federations and World Athletics to ensure the protection of the female category.

“Our thanks go to them for having the passion and determination to make this happen.

“Clear and comprehensive communication, counselling if requested, complete confidentiality, and robust follow-up processes if test results are inconclusive are a critical and core part of World Athletics’ implementation of this test designed to protect and promote the integrity of women’s sport.”

The International Olympic Committee is expected to issue a consensus statement on how it believes the female category could be best protected in the first quarter of this year, according to its president Kirsty Coventry.

Sanju Samson (Pic credit: BCCI)

NEW DELHI: Speculation surfaced on social media after India’s win over West Indies that Sanju Samson could face disciplinary action — or even a ban — for his emotional on-field celebration in Kolkata. The rumours claimed that the Indian batter might miss the upcoming T20 World Cup 2026 semi-final against England on Thursday because he dropped his helmet to the ground after hitting the match-winning boundary.Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW!The moment came at the end of a tense chase when Samson sealed India’s victory with a boundary. As the ball raced away, the right-handed batter removed his helmet and dropped it onto the ground before falling to his knees and offering a prayer. The emotional celebration quickly went viral, with some observers suggesting the act might fall under the International Cricket Council’s Code of Conduct related to equipment abuse.

Sanju Samson’s possible ban: What do the ICC rules say?

A closer look at the rules suggests that the fears of a suspension are largely misplaced. Under Article 2.2 of the ICC Code of Conduct, players can be penalised for “abuse of cricket equipment,” which includes actions such as throwing or striking items like helmets, bats, or stumps in frustration. The rule also covers deliberate damage to advertising boards, boundary fences, or dressing room fixtures.Even if Samson’s act were to be reviewed under this provision, it would most likely fall under a Level 1 offence — the lowest category of disciplinary breaches. Level 1 incidents typically attract fines or demerit points rather than suspensions.Former international umpire Anil Chaudhary also dismissed the speculation, explaining that Samson’s gesture appeared to be an emotional celebration rather than an act of anger or protest. According to him, such moments are common in high-pressure matches and are rarely treated as serious offences.Recent examples support this interpretation. Scotland’s George Munsey received only one demerit point earlier in the tournament after throwing his helmet in frustration following his dismissal.As things stand, there has been no official charge or complaint against Samson from match officials. India are scheduled to face England in the semi-final at Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai on March 5, and the wicketkeeper-batter remains fully eligible to play.

India and England will face off in the semifinal of the T20 World Cup 2026 on Thursday, March 5. The Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai will play host to this contest.

India finished at the top of Group A in the initial round. In the Super 8s, they finished second in Group 1 and qualified for the semifinal. The Men in Blue made it to the top four for the sixth time in the history of the tournament.

On the other hand, England finished second in Group C to advance to the Super 8s. In the Super 8, they topped Group 2 and remained unbeaten. This is also England’s sixth semifinal appearance in the T20 World Cup.

While the Men in Blue are the defending champions, having won the previous edition in 2024, England won the tournament in the 2022 edition.

On that note, let us take a look at three players who could score the most runs in today’s clash between India and England.

#3 Jos Buttler

England opener and senior pro Jos Buttler has had a tournament to forget so far. Despite his experience, he has failed to get going at the top. In seven games, he has scored just 62 runs at an average of 8.85 and a strike rate of 106.89.

That said, England will back Buttler in a knockout game and expect him to come good under pressure. He is due for a big score and would like to deliver in the semifinal.

Buttler has played 27 T20Is against India and has scored 644 runs at an average of 32.30 and a strike rate of 143.75. Moreover, having played for the Mumbai Indians (MI) and a lot of IPL cricket, he will be aware of the conditions at the Wankhede Stadium as well. In 24 IPL games at the venue, he has scored 761 runs at an average of 34.59 and a strike rate of 141.19.

#2 Harry Brook

England captain Harry Brook has been in solid form for them in the tournament so far. He is their leading run-getter with 228 runs from seven games at an average of 32.57 and a strike rate of161.70 with a century and a half-century.

Brook has a decent record against India. In 10 T20Is, he has scored 171 runs at a strike rate of 140.16. In India, he has scored 179 runs from nine T20Is at a strike rate of 147.93 with two half-centuries.

At the Wankhede Stadium, Brook has played three T20Is, scoring 72 runs at a strike rate of 144.00 with a half-century. The England skipper will aim to lead from the front with the bat in a crucial game.

#1 Suryakumar Yadav

India skipper Suryakumar Yadav‘s form has been hot and cold in the tournament. He began on a brilliant note with an unbeaten 84 against the USA, but has not gotten a big score after that. However, he has been batting well, scoring 231 runs from seven games at an average of 38.50 and a strike rate of 135.88.

Against England, Suryakumar has scored 349 runs from 13 games at a strike rate of 171.92. In three T20Is at the Wankhede, he has scored 93 runs at an average of 43.50 and a strike rate of 150. Moreover, he has played 39 IPL games at the venue, piling on 1394 runs at an average of 43.56 and a strike rate of 165.36.

Playing domestic cricket for Mumbai and IPL for the Mumbai Indians (MI), he will be expected to do well with the bat in familiar conditions.