Manchester United secured a 3-2 win over Liverpool last week, with Howard Webb giving his take on a particularly controversial goal
Howard Webb has clarified that VAR’s choice not to chalk off Benjamin Sesko’s controversial ‘handball’ goal against Liverpool was based on insufficient evidence to overturn the decision. United secured a 3-2 win over their bitter rivals earlier this month to stamp their place in Europe for the new season.
Matheus Cunha broke the deadlock at Old Trafford just six minutes in, before Sesko added a second merely eight minutes later. While United went into the interval with a comfortable lead, Liverpool demonstrated resilience to restore parity early in the second-half – Dominik Szoboszlai and Cody Gakpo bringing the scores level.
A draw for Arne Slot’s outfit might have been a respectable outcome given United’s recent form, but fortune dictated otherwise. Kobbie Mainoo netted the winner with only 13 minutes of regulation time left to guarantee all three points stayed in Greater Manchester.
Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our United WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. You can also join our United Facebook page by clicking HERE and don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.
Yet some Liverpool supporters will have felt aggrieved, particularly given the controversy surrounding Sesko’s strike. Luke Shaw whipped the ball into the penalty area, with Bruno Fernandes nodding it back across goal towards the Slovenian forward.
While Freddie Woodman managed to get a hand to it and disrupt its path, the ball eventually ricocheted off Sesko’s torso and over the line. Close-up footage appeared to show the ball brushing Sesko’s fingertips before crossing the goal line, with VAR analysing whether a handball had occurred.
Following a significant delay, play continued with United leading Liverpool 2-0, much to the frustration of Reds players and supporters watching on. Webb has since explained that VAR were correct to permit the goal, given the lack of conclusive evidence that an infringement had occurred.
Speaking on Match Officials Mic’d Up, the 54-year-old said: “I think the clip kind of speaks for itself, doesn’t it, really? I’m pretty much with you. I think it probably does hit the hand. But of course, the VARs need that conclusivity. They need to be absolutely certain that it does.
FOLLOW OUR MAN UNITED FB PAGE! Latest news and analysis via the MEN’s Manchester United Facebook page
Sky Sports, HBO Max, Netflix and Disney+ with Ultimate TV package

Sky has upgraded its Ultimate TV and Sky Sports bundle to now include HBO Max, Netflix, Disney+, discovery+ and Hayu, as well as 135 channels and full Sky coverage of the Premier League and EFL.
Sky broadcasts more than 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more with at least 215 live from the top flight alongside Formula 1, darts and golf.
“And it doesn’t matter what we think, does it? It matters what they think. And we do ask them to be sure that something needs acting upon. Clearly, Sesko doesn’t deliberately handle this. He doesn’t make himself bigger. It’s all very natural.
“But, of course, the Laws of the Game require any goal that comes off the hand immediately, or where the player scores immediately after hitting the arm, then it has to be disallowed, and that means the VAR has no option but to start looking for that.
“Sometimes it looks like they’re being a bit too forensic, and you hear, in this situation, the VAR looking from various angles. They want to get it right.
“If it does conclusively come off the arm, but they don’t get to that level of certainty, they probably think it probably does as well, but they need to be absolutely categorical to get involved, and they weren’t able to find it, and hence the reason that the on-field decision stood.”





Texas Tech is likely to have the best defense in the Big 12 again in 2026, along with BYU.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login