Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Sports

NBA playoffs winners, losers: Embiid’s gutsy effort leads 76ers, Brunson takes over for Knicks

Published

on

The Philadelphia 76ers kept their season alive Tuesday night with a gutty road win over the Boston Celtics. On the heels of an ugly Game 4 loss at home, Philadelphia responded with a dominant second half — particularly from Joel Embiid in his second game back after an emergency appendectomy. 

Elsewhere in the East, the New York Knicks took control of their series with the Atlanta Hawks with a commanding 126-97 win over the Atlanta Hawks at home. Now up 3-2, the Knicks have rebounded with back-to-back wins after falling behind 2-1 and can advance with a win in Game 6 in Atlanta on Thursday. 

Later on, the San Antonio Spurs became the second team in the West to advance to Round 2 by taking care of business against the Portland Trail Blazers in Game 5. 

Here are the biggest winners and losers of Tuesday night’s action.

Advertisement

Loser: Appendicitis (in its showdown vs. Joel Embiid)

Joel Embiid had an appendectomy 19 days ago. That he’s playing basketball is remarkable. That he’s able to cook the Celtics and absolutely take over the second half of a playoff game is incredible.

Embiid was the driving force behind the Sixers’ Game 5 victory. In 39 minutes, he scored 33 points (12-23 FG) and dished out eight assists. Imagine the numbers he could have put up if he hadn’t gotten off to such a rough start!

It was ancient history by the time Philadelphia was cruising to a comfortable win, but Embiid missed six of his first seven shots on Tuesday. Four of those misses were 3s. When those weren’t going in, he decided to change his approach.

“I started going inside and found some luck,” Embiid told ESPN’s Lisa Salters in his walkoff interview.

Advertisement

After halftime, Embiid scored 18 points on 7-for-10 shooting and didn’t take a single 3. I’m normally not a “bigs belong on the block!” guy, but it was exhilarating to watch him bully Nikola Vučević and make the Celtics look stupid for trying to front him. He hit a few vintage pull-ups and turnarounds — you know, the stuff that makes him an impossible matchup — in isolation, too. A truly superb showing.

A couple of weeks ago, it was fair to assume that appendicitis had effectively ended Embiid’s (and Philadelphia’s) season. Considering all of the other things his body has been through, maybe appendicitis never stood a chance. — James Herbert

Winner: Jalen Brunson

This hasn’t been the best series for Jalen Brunson. He hasn’t shot the ball that well. His defensive vulnerabilities — and the Hawks’ ability to aggressively and successfully expose them — have been well chronicled. But he remains a top-shelf scorer and he reminded everyone of that in Game 5 with 39 points and eight assists in the biggest game of New York’s season. 

Brunson scored 22 points in the second half (17 in the fourth quarter) and went on a run of 10 straight, which included this nasty old-fashioned 3-point play:

Advertisement

Followed by this deep pull-up on the ensuing possession:

Brunson came into Game 5 averaging 25.5 points per game in the series; not his best, but good enough. The problem was the efficiency — just 41% from the floor. In Game 5, he finished 15 of 23 overall and 3 of 5 from 3. He committed just one turnover and was in total control throughout. 

OG Anunoby and Karl-Anthony Towns were great. Jose Alvarado had his best game of the series in still pretty low minutes. New York’s defense was fantastic. The bench came to play. They dominated the points in the paint and doubled up Atlanta’s free-throw attempts, a credit to their physical advantage throughout the game. These were all factors in New York’s win. 

But all that said, Brunson has to be awesome for this team to legitimately compete with the top contenders. He was all of that and more on Tuesday. — Brad Botkin

Advertisement

Loser: CJ McCollum

McCollum entered Game 5 averaging nearly 25 points per game in this series. He took over Madison Square Garden and was winning the one-on-one matchup with Brunson somewhat decidedly. In Atlanta’s two wins, he went for 55 points. On Tuesday, he scored just six. 

Josh Hart was all over McCollum, but it was also a group effort. New York ramped up its defense in Game 4 and it continued into Game 5. The rotations, the physicality, the urgency. They fought the screens, and every corner McCollum tried to turn was cut off by layers of help.

Towns cut off his penetration and blocked his 3-point attempt on one possession, and stepped up to contest a floater in the lane on another. It was a group effort, and McCollum found the sledding to be far tougher than it had been through the first four games of this series.

For Atlanta to win Game 6 back home, McCollum probably has to have another big game, but it’s a fine line in putting the ball in his hands too much and allowing New York’s defense to narrow its focus. Atlanta probably needs to put McCollum in better positions to create secondarily rather than always as the focal point, but of course, that requires other guys to get it going.

Advertisement

Jonathan Kuminga is my Game 6 X-factor. He’s the ultimate wild card. If he can get it going, he can open a lot up for McCollum with the home crowd behind them. — Brad Botkin

Winner: Grit and Grimes

Shoutout to Quentin Grimes

The 3 to put Philadelphia up six was big, but please focus on the grimy one-on-one defense against Jaylen Brown on the possession that followed:

That is exactly the kind of effort that the Sixers needed with their season on the line against the Celtics. 

Advertisement

Grimes was plus-17 in 28 minutes on Tuesday. He finished with 18 points, and it was an awesome time to have a hot shooting night (5-8 FG, 4-7 3PT, 4-4 FT). Plays like the above defensive stand, though, had as much to do with Philly’s victory as its offensive efficiency did. (Grimes rejected Jayson Tatum from behind on a fast break, too.)

When the Sixers trailed by 13 a couple of minutes into the second half, they could have packed it in. Instead, they dug in. Philadelphia responded with a 15-3 run, patiently finding high-quality looks on just about every offensive possession and nudging the Celtics toward their worst habits on the other end. The Sixers then dominated the fourth, holding Boston without a bucket for almost five minutes and earning their gutsiest win of the season. — James Herbert

Winner: Victor Wembanyama

Was it an especially glamorous victory for Victor Wembanyama? No. If you’re looking for one of those, Game 1 of this series more than sufficed. The numbers were subtle by Wemby’s standards — 17 points, 14 rebounds, six blocks. The glory was shared. This was a team victory. Five Spurs scored at least 15 points, but none topped 21.

But Wembanyama is the sort of player for whom any box checked is a memorable one, and he’s checked quite a few of them lately. A unanimous Defensive Player of the Year trophy, for instance, and that Game 1 “first playoff victory.” It was relatively tame, especially since he missed Game 3, but for the rest of his career, this series will always be a trivia question. 

Advertisement

The first series Wembanyama won came against Portland. He overcame a concussion and overwhelmed a lower-seeded opponent as we expect him to do many, many more times in his career. — Sam Quinn

Loser: Donovan Clingan

As one highly drafted center rises, another stumbles. It’s only Year 2 for Donovan Clingan, and he’s playing on a flawed roster. Still, it’s hard not to be a little concerned with what we just watched. Centers shouldn’t ever shoot 14-for-46 from the field in a series. Portland was outscored by 47 points in Clingan’s minutes during the series. He was too slow defensively. He didn’t look ready for the moment.

Again, he’s 22. We don’t need to get carried away. But Portland won Robert Williams III’s minutes in this series, and while Williams is a very effective player in smaller doses, he’s not exactly a superstar. Portland has a lot staked on its young center, and his sophomore season was by and large a success. But this series wasn’t, and that’s part of why Portland’s season is now over. — Sam Quinn

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

What We Would Have Done with Every Vikings Draft Pick

Published

on

Advertisement

USC WR Makai Lemon at the NFL Combine in 2026
USC wide receiver Makai Lemon gazed into the camera and delivers a highly awkward speech in front of reporters at the 2026 NFL Combine. Lemon was later selected by the Philadelphia Eagles in the 2026 NFL Draft. Mandatory Credit: YouTube

VikingsTerritory piloted a new exercise in 2026: selecting Minnesota Vikings draft picks in real-time as if we were the general manager. It’s not necessarily a “mock” draft; it’s a “what we would have done in the heat of the moment” alternate draft.

VT’s version of the Vikings’ draft is a completely different animal.

For example, we would not have drafted Caleb Banks in Round 1; instead, we would have embraced, in our estimation, the best player available on the board.

Advertisement

Our Alternate Vikings Draft Class Is Here. Hold Us Accountable.

Important note: for the purposes of this exercise, we ignore who and what the Vikings drafted. For instance, the Vikings drafted a DT in Round 1; we did not. Our draft or roster still needed a DT. The Vikings did not.

And one more caveat: we would not have traded Jonathan Greenard to the Philadelphia Eagles. It’s hard to understand how a team that is paying its starting quarterback $1.3 million has such profound salary cap trouble. Finally, you will notice this draft does not have defensive tackles: we would’ve signed Christian Wilkins, who has ties to Brian Flores, in post-draft free agency.

Makai Lemon returns a kickoff against Michigan at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. Vikings draft picks
USC Trojans wide receiver Makai Lemon (6) fields a kickoff and advances upfield during second-half action against the Michigan Wolverines at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, with Oct. 11, 2025 capturing the return moment. Lemon accelerates through coverage lanes as USC looks to flip field position in a tightly contested matchup. Mandatory Credit: Jayne Kamin-Oncea-Imagn Images.

R1: Makai Lemon (WR)
Who the Vikings Picked: Caleb Banks (DT)

We — and the rest of the NFL world — were shocked that Lemon slid to the Vikings’ spot, ultimately landing with the Philadelphia Eagles. To us, he was the best player available at No. 18. Done. Pick the best football player.

Advertisement

Justin Jefferson, in theory, could request a trade next offseason if the Vikings don’t reach the playoffs in 2026, and Jordan Addison is one incident away from a suspension or outright roster release.

This one was not complicated for us: Lemon was the VikingsTerritoryGM selection. By a mile.

R2: Emmanuel McNeil-Warren (S)
Who the Vikings Picked: Jake Golday (LB)

If you followed the pre-draft cycle intently, it was actually astonishing that McNeil-Warren slid to Minnesota’s spot at No. 49.

Advertisement

And then, of course, they didn’t pick him. He went to the Cleveland Browns. In our after-the-fact draft, this was the biggest no-brainer of them all. Easy peasy — get EMW on the team.

R3: Jaishawn Barham (EDGE)
Who the Vikings Picked: Domonique Orange (DT)

The Greenard trade went down — for better or worse — on Friday night, and it’s not reversible. We decided to leave the knowledge of the real-life trade intact and pick Barham from Michigan as a stab at a competent replacement plan.

Barham landed in Dallas.

Advertisement

We do, however, love the Orange pick.

R3: Connor Lew (C)
Who the Vikings Picked: Caleb Tiernan (OT)

Lew is 20 and could have sat for a year behind Blake Brandel if necessary. Instead, Minnesota evidently had a keen eye for little-known Gavin Gerhardt, who would be chosen in Round 7.

The Auburn product Lew landed with the Bengals and will eventually battle Ted Karras for the starting job. He also plays next to former Vikings guard Dalton Risner.

Advertisement

R3: Jonah Coleman (RB)
Who the Vikings Picked: Jakobe Thomas (S)

We pounded the table and then some for Minnesota to draft a serious running back this cycle, and in fact, we’ve been asking for that since the 2023 NFL Draft. They never listen.

Jonah Coleman runs through defenders during a game against Maryland at SECU Stadium. Vikings draft picks
Washington Huskies running back Jonah Coleman (1) carries the ball through traffic against the Maryland defense at SECU Stadium, with Oct. 4, 2025 marking the in-game sequence. Coleman drives forward with power as Washington leans on its rushing attack, absorbing contact while pushing for extra yardage in a competitive road matchup. Mandatory Credit: Jamie Sabau-Imagn Images.

Demond Claiborne might turn into the next De’Von Achane, but we preferred Coleman, who wound up with Sean Payton in Denver inside the largest RB committee of them all.

R5: Chandler Rivers (CB)
Who the Vikings Picked: Max Bredeson (FB)

Rivers is going to be a baller, but Kevin O’Connell wanted a fullback. Because Byron Murphy Jr. and Isaiah Rodgers remained 100% healthy in 2025, we fear the injury bill is coming due. So, Rivers was the pick to prepare that grim prediction.

Advertisement

Rivers is a Raven — he’ll probably cook there.

R5: Taurean York (LB)
Who the Vikings Picked: Charles Demmings (CB)

Perhaps our most significant (only?) gaffe: we would’ve taken York in real time, but he ended up not getting drafted by anybody and was signed by the Denver Broncos in undrafted free agency. If we have a big miss in this exercise, it might be this guy.

R6: Domani Jackson (CB)
Who the Vikings Picked: Demond Claiborne (RB)

Advertisement
Domani Jackson intercepts a pass during a game at Bryant-Denny Stadium against South Carolina. Vikings draft picks
Alabama Crimson Tide defensive back Domani Jackson (1) intercepts a pass during fourth-quarter action against the South Carolina Gamecocks at Bryant-Denny Stadium, with Oct. 12, 2024 capturing the decisive play. Jackson secures possession while protecting Alabama’s lead late in the game. Mandatory Credit: Will McLelland-Imagn Images.

Speaking of needing cornerbacks, we doubled up. The Green Bay Packers — yes, them — took Jackson in Round 6, so it will be easy for Vikings fans to determine if our website nailed this hypothetical pick. If Jackson earns playing time, the Vikings will see him twice per year.

R7: Aamil Wagner (OT)
Who the Vikings Picked: Gavin Gerhardt (OL)

Finally, for offensive line depth, we did not invest a 3rd-Rounder in Tiernan; we figured the combo platter of Walter Rouse, Ryan Van Demark, Blake Brandel, and Wagner would be enough.

How’d we do overall? That can be answered in 2028 or 2029 when rookies show their true colors and staying power.


avatar
Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Oilers’ experience pays off in Game 5 win to save season

Published

on

EDMONTON — It’s still unknown whether the Edmonton Oilers have two more wins over these Anaheim Ducks in them this spring. But the Oilers couldn’t settle this series on Tuesday night anyhow.

They just had to win one to stay alive, and darned if a veteran team didn’t muster up its best game of the series in a tidy 4-1 win on home ice. The win earns Edmonton one more flight to California and one more chance to skirt extinction, down 3-2 to the Ducks in Round 1 of these National Hockey League playoffs, with Game 6 set for The Pond on Thursday night (10 p.m. ET/ 8 p.m. MT on Sportsnet).

“I don’t know what it is with us,” said Oilers defenceman Evan Bouchard after a three-assist night. “When our backs are against the wall, we play good hockey, and we did that tonight.

“It shows we’re a good team,” he added. “We know that and we proved it tonight. Good teams find a way to do it multiple times in a row.”

Advertisement

By the 10:13 mark of the opening period Tuesday, the Oilers had scored three times and sent Anaheim starter Lukas Dostal to the showers. And even though the Ducks outshot them handily the rest of the way, an Anaheim team that averaged five goals a game through the opening four games of the series only put one puck behind goalie Connor Ingram, who got his net back after Tristan Jarry got the nod in Game 4.

“(The coaches) let me know what was going on. I had no problem with it,” Ingram said of losing his gig for a game. “I was frustrated after Game 3, just with myself and what was going on (allowing six goals). So to give myself a little break mentally and physically was huge.”

Ingram made a few game-preserving saves, thwarting Leo Carlsson on a partial breakaway late in Period 1 that held the score at 3-0. A late Ducks goal would have been invaluable heading into the intermission, but instead Ingram gave the Oilers the save that makes a real difference in a game like this one.

“(Ingram) was timely,” said Connor McDavid. “He didn’t face many shots in the first, so that was a huge save at a big moment. Goaltending, as I’ve said before, is not about saving them all. It’s about saving the right ones, and that was the right one.”

Advertisement

An Edmonton team that gets goaltending it can believe in is an entirely different animal, one we’ve seldom seen. They’ll need two more of these to have any chance of coming all the way back from a 3-1 series deficit.

But this was an impressive first step, one that reminded the Ducks who they’re messing with, after a loosely played opening four games.

“They went to two Cup Finals for a reason: They’re a good hockey team,” said Anaheim winger Troy Terry. “We believe in this room, but we knew they were going to push.

“I didn’t think we weren’t ready. I just felt like we weren’t necessarily as physical and maybe just executing early. And they played hard.”

Advertisement

There were positives in this for Edmonton. Many of them, actually.

After playing less than 20 minutes and visibly limping through Game 4, McDavid played 24:09 in Game 5 and looked a tad healthier. He’s still not at the top of his form, but had two assists and said there “was never a doubt” that he’d play Tuesday.

For the first time this series, Anaheim scored less than three goals — and none at even strength. That’s a place to start for an Oilers team that’s been on a season-long search for a defensive game it can be proud of.

Vasily Podkolzin was a juggernaut, scoring the game’s first goal and showing up in a big game with an effort that said to his teammates, “Follow me.” And after breaking up the line of Leon Draisaitl, Podkolzin and Kasperi Kapanen — Edmonton’s best unit thus far in the series — to put McDavid and Draisaitl together, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins centred a line with Podkolzin and Zach Hyman that produced the first two goals of the game.

Advertisement

Depth scoring, a power play that answered right after Anaheim had made the score 3-1, and only two Ducks power plays allowed are all things that Edmonton requires for success.

Now, they have to do it again in Anaheim, where the young feisty Ducks will try to close this series out on Thursday.

“It will take a big effort. A really, really big effort,” McDavid said. “We’re still in a tough, tough spot. A really tough spot. We’ve got to find a way to win in a tough building.

“I thought we were right there in Game 4 and will have another great opportunity in Game 6.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Donald Trump interrupts speech to praise Rory McIlroy’s ‘unconquerable courage’

Published

on

US President Donald Trump interrupted his speech during a White House banquet to ask Rory McIlroy to stand and praised the golfer for his “unconquerable courage”.

The president was speaking during a state visit by the King and Queen and broke off to address McIlroy, who was one of those in attendance at the dinner.

McIlroy successfully defended his Masters title earlier in April, becoming only the fourth man to win back-to-back at Augusta, as he sealed a one-shot victory.

Trump said: “The entire world has been uplifted by this distinct and special character we share. This unstoppable daring, this unconquerable courage. It really is, it’s unconquerable.

“Speaking of that, where’s Rory McIlroy? Can you stand up Rory, will you, please?

Advertisement

“That was unconquerable courage. That was very good Rory. I don’t know if that helps him talking about how wonderful the speech… but I had to interrupt my speech because I watched that man win a tournament that was a tough one.

“Congratulations, very proud of you.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Jalen Brunson pours in 39 as Knicks go up 3-2 on Hawks

Published

on

NBA: Playoffs-Atlanta Hawks at New York KnicksApr 28, 2026; New York, New York, USA; New York Knicks guard Jalen Brunson (11) controls the ball against Atlanta Hawks guard CJ McCollum (3) during the first quarter of game five of the first round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-Imagn Images

Jalen Brunson scored 39 points to lift the host New York Knicks to a 126-97 victory over the Atlanta Hawks on Tuesday in Game 5 of an Eastern Conference first-round series.

New York holds a 3-2 lead in the best-of-seven series. The Knicks will look to advance to the conference semifinals on Thursday when they play Game 6 in Atlanta.

Brunson made 15 of 23 shots from the floor and added eight assists against one turnover for New York, which shot a robust 57% from the field.

OG Anunoby contributed 17 points and 10 rebounds for the Knicks, who held a decisive 48-27 edge on the boards and a 60-42 advantage in points in the paint.

New York’s Karl-Anthony Towns collected 16 points, 14 rebounds and six assists on the heels of recording 20, 10 and 10, respectively, in the Knicks’ 114-98 victory at Atlanta in Game 4 on Saturday.

Advertisement

Jose Alvarado added 12 points off the bench for the Knicks.

Atlanta’s Jalen Johnson recorded 18 points, 10 rebounds and six assists.

Dyson Daniels had 17 points and Onyeka Okongwu and Nickeil Alexander-Walker each had 16 for the Hawks, who shot 31% (13 of 42) from 3-point range and were limited to just four fastbreak points.

Advertisement

Atlanta’s CJ McCollum continued to struggle after playing the role of hero in Games 2 and 3. He followed up his 17-point performance in Game 4 with just six points on 3-of-10 shooting from the floor on Tuesday.

Johnson’s dunk pulled Atlanta within 23-20 before New York went on a 12-2 run to end the first quarter. The Hawks didn’t do themselves any favors by making just 1 of 8 attempts from 3-point range in the opening period.

The Knicks extended their lead to 59-37 after Anunoby’s steal led to Brunson’s layup with 3:08 remaining in the second quarter. The Hawks, however, closed the quarter on an 11-5 run to get within 64-48 at halftime.

New York led by 18 points in the third quarter while giving Brunson and Towns a breather. Brunson, however, scored eight points during a 12-0 Knicks run during the fourth quarter that effectively ended any faint hopes Atlanta had for a comeback.

Advertisement

–Field Level Media

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Maybe slide Suryakumar down to five

Published

on

Former New Zealand and Mumbai Indians (MI) seamer Mitchell McClenaghan believes the franchise’s top order could undergo a reshuffle against SunRisers Hyderabad (SRH), with Suryakumar Yadav potentially dropping to No. 5. The two sides will clash in Game 41 of IPL 2026 on Wednesday, April 29 at the Wankhede Stadium.

Speaking during the Star Sports segment ‘Game Plan,’ the 39-year-old said MI will need to put up a strong batting performance against SRH and suggested that Will Jacks could slot into the top four, which might push Suryakumar down the order. He said:

“They need to score runs against SRH. That’s what it is. It’s going to be a batting shootout, and they need to make sure they have enough batting. So Will Jacks adds into that. It’s just how do you fix the order? Does Will Jacks go up to the top? And then you might look at a different top four and have the ability to maybe slide Suryakumar down to five.”

Advertisement

He further noted that Danish Malewar did not utilise his opportunity in the absence of Rohit Sharma, managing just two runs in as many games. McClenaghan stated that if Rohit returns to the side, having missed the last three games due to a hamstring injury, it would solidify the top order.

MI could then open with him alongside Quinton de Kock or Ryan Rickelton, followed by Will Jacks and Naman Dhir, while players like Hardik Pandya and Suryakumar Yadav handle the finishing duties. He said:

“I think the big dip in that has been that they’ve lost Rohit Sharma, and Danish has come in and, unfortunately for the young fella, it hasn’t worked out for him. But if Rohit Sharma is available again, then that solidifies your top order. So you’ve got the ability to either go with Quinton or Rickleton at the top with Rohit Sharma, and then Will Jacks comes into that fixture as well. So that gives you a very aggressive top three.

“And then that’s where I’d consider maybe even playing Naman Dhir at four, just to be able to give yourself the ability to take on that powerplay when the conditions are best for you to score some runs, and then you set yourself up for your experienced players like Sherfane Rutherford, Suryakumar Yadav, and Hardik Pandya to be able to finish the innings,” he added.

MI have not endured the best of seasons so far, sitting ninth with two wins from seven games.


“If he works a little more on his footwork, it will definitely help” – Cheteshwar Pujara’s big remark on MI’s star batter

In the same discussion, former India batter Cheteshwar Pujara stated that if Suryakumar Yadav works a bit on his footwork, it will help the right-hander. Pujara also added that, at times, Suryakumar has tried to play too many shots early on and should allow himself a little more time before accelerating. He said:

Advertisement

“I can’t pinpoint one thing, but I remember his (Suryakumar Yadav) dismissals against Rabada where there was enough gap between bat and pad. I think if he works a little more on his footwork, it will definitely help him. But it’s just about having that positive mindset because he is a player who knows how to play in the T20 format. It’s just about having one big knock.

“Sometimes he is also trying to play too many shots early on. That’s why he has gotten out in a couple of games where he was just looking to strike the ball in the first three or four deliveries. If he allows himself a little more time, because he is another player who, after 10-15 deliveries, can always bring that strike rate up,” he added.

Across seven innings, Suryakumar has scored 157 runs at an average of 22.42 and a strike rate of 142.72, including one fifty.