Gautam Gambhir and Harshit Rana (Agency Image)

Former India wicketkeeper-batter Dinesh Karthik questioned the Gautam Gambhir-led team management after pacer Harshit Rana was promoted ahead of Shivam Dube during India’s disastrous batting collapse in the third T20I against England at Trent Bridge. India’s chase of 202 unravelled rapidly after Axar Patel was dismissed off the final ball of the fifth over, leaving the visitors reeling at 52/5. Instead of sending in Dube, the team management opted to promote Harshit Rana, a move that left Karthik stunned while on commentary. “Are you serious? Harshit Rana ahead of Shivam Dube? You can’t be serious,” Karthik said on air. Dube eventually came to the crease two overs later but failed to rescue the innings, scoring just two runs from four deliveries before being dismissed by Josh Tongue. Karthik admitted he could not understand the decision to delay Dube’s arrival, suggesting it raised questions over the team’s confidence in the all-rounder. “Do they (the team management) not trust Dube enough to send him in at this stage? Instead, they’ve promoted Harshit Rana ahead of him. I’m not sure that’s the right way to go about it,” he added. The selection call came during one of India’s worst-ever batting performances in the format. England piled up 201/7 after Phil Salt led the way with a blistering 70 off 44 balls, while Sam Curran chipped in with 41 from just 24 deliveries on a challenging Trent Bridge surface. India’s reply never gained momentum despite Vaibhav Sooryavanshi hitting two early sixes in his 13 off five balls. The visitors collapsed from 23/0 to 76 all out in just 11.4 overs, with Josh Tongue claiming 4/28 and Jofra Archer picking up 3/29. The 125-run defeat was India’s biggest by runs in T20 internationals, surpassing their previous heaviest loss of 80 runs against New Zealand in 2019. It also marked India’s second-lowest all-out total in the format. The defeat handed England a 2-0 lead in the five-match series after the opening match had been washed out. India have now lost their last four completed T20Is, following a 2-0 series defeat in Ireland. Captain Shreyas Iyer described the performance as “atrocious” after the match and admitted his side needed to “completely go back to the drawing board.” England captain Harry Brook praised his team’s all-round display, saying, “We adapted well with the bat. To carry that into the bowling was awesome.” India must now win the remaining two matches to avoid losing the T20I series.

After a month of shocks, late goals, penalty shootouts and political noise, the Fifa World Cup 2026 has reached its last-eight stage. The co-hosts are gone. Brazil are out. Portugal have departed. The United States’ exit was wrapped in controversy. Yet the holders remain alive, France still look like the team to beat, and Erling Haaland has turned Norway’s surprise run into one of the stories of the tournament.

The tournament has narrowed, but the narratives have multiplied.

France vs Morocco: favourites face their first big test

But Morocco are not just a romantic story. They are organised, disciplined and technically secure in midfield. Their 3-0 win over Canada was ruthless, and they have lost only once in 90 minutes across their last 50 matches. Noussair Mazraoui gives them defensive security, while Azzedine Ounahi’s two goals against Canada were a reminder of his ability to float through tight spaces.

• 
  Players to watch: Kylian Mbappe, Michael Olise, Azzedine Ounahi, Noussair Mazraoui
• 
  Prediction: France to advance

Spain vs Belgium: control meets tactical revival

  Spain have moved through the tournament with less noise than France, Argentina or England, but their defensive record is extraordinary. They have not conceded a goal and have stretched their World Cup clean-sheet run to 609 minutes, a record that goes back to Qatar.

Belgium, meanwhile, produced one of the performances of the Round of 16. Amid the fallout from Fifa’s decision to suspend Folarin Balogun’s ban, Belgium dismantled the United States 4-1 in Seattle. Rudi Garcia’s decision to bench Romelu Lukaku, Kevin De Bruyne and Jeremy Doku was bold, and it worked. Charles De Ketelaere was involved in three goals, while Leandro Trossard has been one of the tournament’s most creative players.

• 
  Players to watch: Rodri, Lamine Yamal, Aymeric Laporte, Charles De Ketelaere, Leandro Trossard
• 
  Prediction: Spain to advance

Norway vs England: Haaland, Kane and a proper team test

Norway vs England is the most eagerly awaited tie of the round, not only because of Erling Haaland against Harry Kane, but because both sides have shown different forms of strength.

Norway’s 2-1 win over Brazil was not a smash-and-grab. It was proof that they are more than a well-organised side with Haaland up front. Brazil were restricted to 34 per cent possession, their lowest in a World Cup match, and Norway looked surprisingly comfortable in the knockout spotlight despite being absent from the tournament for 28 years.

England, however, produced their own statement at the Azteca. To beat Mexico 3-2 with 10 men for the last half-hour showed adaptability and resilience. Jude Bellingham scored twice, covered huge ground, and made a decisive defensive intervention. Jordan Pickford’s first-half saves kept England alive before the chaos took over.

This is not merely Haaland vs England. Norway’s midfield of Martin Odegaard, Sander Berge and Patrick Berg gives them structure, intelligence and control. But England’s tournament muscle, Bellingham’s timing and Kane’s experience may still tilt the tie.

Players to watch: Erling Haaland, Martin Odegaard, Sander Berge, Jude Bellingham, Harry Kane, Jordan Pickford

Argentina vs Switzerland: Messi’s chaos meets Swiss discipline

Argentina are still here, but they have not travelled smoothly. They needed extra time to beat Cape Verde and then produced a stunning comeback from 2-0 down against Egypt. Lionel Messi dragged them back in Atlanta, but the match was also clouded by VAR controversy, Egyptian fury and questions over Argentina’s vulnerability.

Messi leads the Golden Boot race with eight goals, one ahead of Haaland and Mbappe. Yet Argentina’s biggest strength may not be structure. It is emotion. Lionel Scaloni’s side have repeatedly shown a strange ability to survive matches that appear to be slipping away.

They have finally broken their Round of 16 wall after exits in 2006, 2014, 2018 and 2022. Against Argentina, they will compress space, slow the rhythm and trust their defensive shape. If Johan Manzambi returns from injury, they will have more attacking threat. Without him, they may struggle to hurt Argentina often enough.

Players to watch: Lionel Messi, Lautaro Martinez, Enzo Fernandez, Gregor Kobel, Ruben Vargas, Breel Embolo

Players who could define the quarterfinals

  Haaland is the most obvious name. His goals against Brazil changed the way Norway are being viewed, from surprise package to genuine threat. He has become the central figure in the tournament’s most intriguing quarterfinal.

Bellingham is England’s emotional and tactical engine. His performance against Mexico was not just about goals. It was about timing, running, defensive recovery and presence in a hostile stadium.

Mbappe remains France’s greatest weapon. Even when he is not dominating possession, he bends the opposition’s structure around him. If Morocco leave space, he can end the contest quickly.

De Ketelaere has become Belgium’s quiet disruptor. His movement, size and elegance make him hard to track, and his role in dismantling the USMNT should not be underestimated.

Pickford and Orjan Nyland could also shape the England-Norway tie. Pickford remains one of the world’s best tournament goalkeepers, while Nyland’s performance against Brazil was central to Norway’s progress.

The under-the-radar names

  Not every quarterfinal story will be written by the scorers. Laporte has been central to Spain’s defensive record. Trossard has created more chances than any other player at the tournament so far. Sander Berge rarely gives the ball away and has become crucial to Norway’s balance. Patrick Berg’s intelligence has helped knit Norway’s midfield together.

Dayot Upamecano has been quietly excellent for France, bringing calm to a player once associated with high-profile errors. For Argentina, Lautaro Martinez’s bench impact against Egypt showed why Scaloni’s squad depth matters. For Switzerland, Kobel may again have to be the difference if they are to take Argentina deep.

Semifinalist predictions

  The most likely semifinal line-up is France, Spain, England and Argentina.

France remain the strongest all-round side and still appear to have another attacking gear. Spain’s defensive record makes them Belgium’s toughest possible opponent. England’s win in Mexico City suggested they have found new ways to suffer and survive. Argentina may not be fully convincing, but Messi and Scaloni’s side keep finding answers in chaos.

There are obvious upset routes. Morocco can frustrate France and force penalties. Belgium have shown tactical flexibility and could punish Spain if the game opens up. Norway can beat England if Haaland is fed early and Odegaard controls the tempo. Switzerland can drag Argentina into another uncomfortable night.

Are France still favourites?

  Yes, but not without caveats.

France have the deepest attacking unit, tournament experience and the ability to win different types of games. They can overwhelm teams with speed, or grind through tight matches. That combination is why they remain favourites.

Spain are the biggest threat because of their control and defensive record. If they reach a semifinal against France, that may decide the eventual champion. Argentina have Messi and belief, but also defensive cracks. England have resilience and Bellingham, but must first survive Haaland. Norway have the tournament’s most compelling striker-led surge, but the last eight will test whether their collective structure can hold under English pressure.

The World Cup has reached the point where favourites matter less than moments. A Kobel save, a Haaland run, a Bellingham header, a Messi pass, a Mbappe acceleration — any one of them can redraw the bracket.

For now, France remain the team to beat. But this World Cup has already made a habit of turning certainty into chaos.

Tennessee Bound, an undefeated mare, would likely be considered a strong favourite for the Caulfield race she is entered for. However, trainer Ciaron Maher is adopting a cautious strategy, preferring to gradually step up her competition.

As a result, the four-year-old is most likely to be seen next in Wednesday’s 1200-metre Evergreen Turf Handicap at Sandown.

The 78-rated mare is nominated for Saturday’s $150,000 benchmark 78 race over 1100m at Caulfield. However, she will compete in Wednesday’s $50,000 BM74 event carrying 59kg, with the advantage of Jabez Johnstone’s 3kg claim, a factor that Maher’s assistant trainer Jack Turnbull found too good to pass up.

“We won’t try to jump too many bars in a row with her, we’ll just go up in slight increments,” Turnbull said.

“She’s done nothing wrong since the last win. She’s an exciting prospect, she had a nice gallop away last week with Blake Shinn on, and he was very fond of her.

“She looks like she’s improved. We could have gone to Saturday, but the programming allowed us to hopefully notch another win before going to an 84.”

Tennessee Bound, a daughter of Written Tycoon and carrying the distinctive Limerick Lane colours of Gerry Ryan, is aiming to extend her winning streak to five races at the start of her career.

She progressed from a maiden win at Kyneton to a Caulfield Heath BM66 in her first preparation, also winning a BM62 race at Cranbourne, before her first-up victory in benchmark 70 grade on Caulfield’s Heath track.

Tennessee Bound has drawn barrier three for Wednesday’s 14-horse race, for which she was the $1.85 favourite on Tuesday morning.

Another daughter of Written Tycoon that the Maher stable is likely to select an easier option for is Signature Scent, who is poised to make her first start since Anzac Day at Caulfield.

The three-year-old filly is entered for the $200,000 Group 3 Sir John Monash Stakes (1100m), but is more likely to be seen in the $150,000 fillies handicap over 1100m.

Following three starts in Adelaide, Signature Scent was freshened. In Adelaide, she won at restricted level, achieved a Listed third placing in the Redelva Stakes (1100m), and finished fifth in the Group 2 Tobin Bronze Stakes (1200m).

“The addition of blinkers was a huge help in Adelaide, got her back to being competitive at Stakes level,” Turnbull said.

“She only had two weeks off, so she’s got a lot of residual (fitness), been in training not so long and she’s just had that one jumpout last week, so she’s in good order.”

Secure your bets on the upcoming races with the best Australian betting sites.

England survived a ​spirited Mexico fightback to secure a 3-2 win on Sunday and book their place in the World Cup quarter-finals, ending ⁠the co-hosts’ deepest run at the tournament in 40 years despite playing most of the second half with 10 men at the Azteca Stadium.

Jude Bellingham put England ​ahead, ⁠striking twice in the space of a minute, finishing a Bukayo Saka ⁠cross before tapping in Harry Kane‘s pass ​to ⁠stun the home crowd.

Advertisement

Mexico’s Julian Quinones pulled one back before half-time, reacting quickest to a loose ball in ‌the box to fire into ‌the roof of the net and revive the co-hosts’ hopes.

England were reduced to 10 men in ⁠the second half after Jarell Quansah was sent off following a VAR review, but Harry Kane restored England’s two-goal lead with a penalty after goalkeeper Raul Rangel fouled Anthony Gordon.

Mexico’s Raul Jimenez reduced the deficit with ‌another penalty after a VAR review ​confirmed a foul from Kane on ‌Brian Gutierrez.

The match ⁠was delayed by one hour due ⁠to adverse weather conditions around the Azteca Stadium.

Advertisement

England will ‌face Norway ​in the last eight ‌in Miami on Saturday.

England’s possible route to World Cup final:

Group fixtures

17 June: England 4-2 Croatia | AT&T Stadium, Arlington

23 June: England 0-0 Ghana | Gillette Stadium, Foxborough

27 June: England 2-0 Panama | MetLife Stadium, New Jersey

Round of 32

1 July: England 2-1 DR Congo | Mercedes-Benz Stadium, Atlanta

Round of 16

5 July: England 3-2 Mexico | Estadio Azteca, Mexico City

Quarter-final

11 July: England vs Norway | Hard Rock Stadium, Miami

Semi-final

15 July: England vs Argentina or Switzerland | Mercedes-Benz Stadium, Atlanta

Final:

19 July: England vs France (most likely opponents by ranking) | MetLife Stadium, New Jersey

Trainer Craig Carmody, who previously conditioned Sir Les’ dam, Everage, to stakes success, is dedicating significant effort to refining the promising three-year-old gelding’s natural capabilities.

The All Too Hard colt demonstrated considerable promise in his first two starts, followed by a close fifth in a benchmark 72 Midway race at Rosehill Gardens on May 30th.

Carmody has opted to provide ample spacing between Sir Les’ runs, a strategy aimed at improving his ability to settle, a quality he anticipates will be on display in a three-year-old benchmark 72 race over 1100m at his home track, Royal Randwick, this Saturday.

“He’s going well,” Carmody confirmed.

“He’s had a bit of time in between runs because I just wanted to work a bit on his ability to sort of respond to pressure. He’s been sort of wanting to charge through pressure, as you’ve probably realised when he’s raced, just going a little bit hard.”

“I’ve worked really hard trying to get that going a bit better and I feel as though Chad (Lever) might get a little bit better response on Saturday from him.”

Having secured victories in his first two starts over 1000m, the 1100m distance in town will be a key indicator for Sir Les, though Carmody envisions him developing into a reliable sprinter for many seasons.

“I really needed the last month just to work on getting that response going a little bit better,” Carmody elaborated.

“And look, I’m optimistic that I’m winning that battle, so I’d love to for him to show that on Saturday that he’s listening to the bridle a bit better.”

“I trained the mother, she was a very handy two-year-old, she won what is now the Percy Sykes, formerly the Keith Mackay, we only paid twenty thousand for her and that sparked the interest in Sir Les.”

“He’s only young so I’m in no hurry to race him often, I just want to want to get some lessons into him, get some experience into him, because I think he’s going to be a very handy four-and-five-year-old sprinter.”

Consider the available racing odds for Saturday’s feature race at Royal Randwick through various online bookmakers.

Like this article? Keep independent journalism alive. Support HuffPost.

Norway coach Stale Solbakken said some of his players have been feeling under the weather ahead of their World Cup quarter-final against England on Saturday, as a month of travel, training and high-pressure games begins to take its toll on the squad.

Advertisement

Striker Jorgen Strand Larsen is one of those dealing with health issues, Solbakken added.

“We’ve really only had Jorgen who has had a fever, but then there’s been a bit of coughing and rasping scattered throughout,” Solbakken told reporters. “But there’s air conditioning, flights, changing rooms and all that. There’s 50 people (in Norway’s travelling party), so it would be strange if something or other didn’t crop up.”

Marcus Holmgren Pedersen missed the 2-1 win over Brazil in the round of 16 due to illness, though Solbakken thought the pressure of the World Cup experience may also have affected the 25-year-old.

“I think, without being a doctor, that it’s a combination of the boy being young, he’s come to the World Cup and thought, ‘I’m going to be a backup for Julian (Ryerson)’, he’s had two games and played great,” Solbakken explained.

“He’s got a lot of stimulation, his head is full, his body is full of impressions, and then the system collapses a bit.”

Read the original on HuffPost

FIFA issued suspensions to at least two key members of the U.S. Soccer Federation ahead of Monday’s World Cup matchup with Belgium, according to multiple reports.

ESPN reported that team manager Sam Zapatka and U.S. Soccer Federation Vice President of Security Frank Pannell were the two staff members barred from the match. The U.S. went on to suffer a 4-1 loss to Belgium, ending its 2026 World Cup run.

The tournament’s governing body did not provide a reason for the suspensions.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

A detailed view of the United States Soccer Federation crest logo is seen in the player and team tunnel in game action during an International friendly match between the United States and the Ecuador men’s national teams on March 21, 2019 at Orlando City Stadium in Orlando, Florida. (Robin Alam/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

ESPN, citing sources, also reported that the suspensions were likely tied to incidents that occurred during Team USA’s victory over Bosnia and Herzegovina last week in the Round of 32. The alleged violations involved FIFA match protocols and individuals possibly entering restricted areas. There were no known physical altercations.

USA ADVANCES IN WORLD CUP AFTER CONTROVERSIAL RED CARD VS BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

After joining the U.S. Soccer Federation in 2015, Zapatka was named team administrative manager in 2020.

While U.S. Soccer did not reveal why the suspensions were imposed, it stressed Tuesday that they were not connected to the appeal process surrounding star striker Folarin Balogun’s one-match red-card suspension.

Preparations are made to Soccer House ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup at Venice Beach, on June 06, 2026 in Los Angeles, California. (Robert Cianflone/Getty Images)

Belgium challenged FIFA’s decision to lift Balogun’s suspension, but the governing body ultimately stood by its original ruling, allowing Team USA’s forward to take the field.

President Donald Trump said Monday that he watched the controversial play and later called FIFA President Gianni Infantino to discuss the red card.

“I spoke with Gianni,” Trump told reporters at the White House.

United States men’s national team forward Folarin Balogun is shown a red card by referee Raphael Claus in Santa Clara, California, July 1, 2026. (Phil Noble/Reuters via Imagn Images)

“All I did was, I asked for a review, because I didn’t think it was a foul,” the president said. “And again, I’m good at this stuff. I didn’t think it was a foul. I thought it was two great athletes who crashed into each other and got entangled.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

With the victory over the U.S., Belgium advanced to the quarterfinals and will face Spain on Friday at Los Angeles Stadium.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Barry Lockwood initially expressed that there wasn’t much to report regarding his filly Extreme Taste “because she hasn’t won yet.” However, after further discussion, he’s much more optimistic about her potential to break through at Ipswich on Wednesday.

Extreme Taste, a maiden after three career starts, is scheduled to run in the Ipswich Party Hire Fillies and Mares Maiden (1200m) second-up this campaign. She will jump from barrier nine, having previously finished third at Doomben in maiden company over 1110m on May 24.

“The only thing that will stop her is the wide gate,” Lockwood stated. “She’s ready to win but just needs a bit of luck and I think it was a bit of pilot error as the rider gave away the run to the winner. Going four-deep on the corner and staying there didn’t help. She did a lot of work and the wider the rail is and the wider you are, the worse it gets.”

The filly is now the $2.80 favourite for the race. Benjamin Osmond, a two-kilo claiming apprentice, will take the reins, as Damien Boche is currently sidelined with an injury sustained in a recent fall at Gold Coast.

“If she gets a nice run from the barrier, she’ll be very hard to beat,” veteran trainer Lockwood added. He is enjoying the experience of his training partnership with Emma-Jane Vincent, which was formalised late last year.

The progeny of Extreme Choice and out of the American-bred mare Leamington, Extreme Taste has a notable pedigree, with five of her seven siblings having recorded multiple victories.

Betting sites are offering competitive odds on this Ipswich race.

Atlanta did not merely stage a World Cup knockout match. It staged a trial by noise, heat, suspicion and late Argentine theatre.

Argentina’s 3-2 comeback win over Egypt had everything a classic needs: a two-goal deficit, a desperate champion, Lionel Messi refusing to let the story end, and Enzo Fernandez arriving in stoppage time to complete the escape. But this Round of 16 tie will be remembered as much for Egypt’s rage as for Argentina’s rescue.

By full-time, Egypt were not just beaten. They felt wronged. The technical area had turned into a second battlefield, the referee was surrounded by questions, and Egyptian players and staff left convinced that the world champions had been helped through.

Mostafa Ziko, one of Egypt’s goalscorers, put that anger in its most explosive form.

“It was the referee. The cup is directed towards Argentina,” he said.

That sentence turned a breathless comeback into something larger: a debate about VAR, fairness, Messi’s global pull and whether football’s biggest stars are allowed to survive nights that might have buried others.

A classic comeback drowned by controversy

On paper, Argentina’s win looked like the sort of result champions produce. They trailed 2-0, absorbed the shock, found a way back, and struck the decisive blow in stoppage time. Cristian Romero began the recovery, Messi equalised, and Fernandez finished it.

But this was not clean champion theatre. It was messy, disputed and furious.

Egypt head coach Hossam Hassan said his team had been denied justice. He claimed Egypt should have had a second goal when leading 1-0, only for Ziko’s 67th-minute effort to be disallowed after a VAR review. He also argued Egypt should have been awarded a stoppage-time penalty for an incident involving Mohamed Salah shortly before Argentina broke away and scored the winner.

The sequence made the defeat feel unbearable for Egypt. A goal ruled out. A late penalty appeal ignored. A winner conceded almost immediately after. Then cards shown to the Egyptian bench as protests boiled over.

This was the chaos of Atlanta: Egypt crying foul, Argentina escaping, and Messi’s World Cup still alive.

Egypt’s anger: ‘There’s no justice in this competition’

Hassan’s post-match reaction was not a routine complaint about marginal calls. It was a full denunciation of the match’s direction.

“We haven’t seen respect or fair play,” he said, pointing towards referee Francois Letexier and Argentina’s players.

Hassan accused Argentina of pressuring the referee and suggested that pressure influenced the outcome. To him, the disputed decisions did not feel isolated. The disallowed goal, the late penalty appeal, the stoppage-time winner and the cards to his bench became part of one larger grievance.

“Life is unfair. The world is unfair. OK, but why isn’t there any fairness in sports?” Hassan said.

Later, he went further. “Perhaps they wanted to keep the world champions in the competition? Perhaps they wanted Messi to stay in the running?” he said.

Scott said the decision to rule out Egypt’s goal was incorrect because Attia’s challenge on Lisandro Martinez in the build-up was “normal contact” rather than a foul. The incident had also taken place nearly 100 yards from Argentina’s goal, giving the world champions enough time and bodies to regroup defensively.

In Scott’s view, VAR had gone too far by returning to a marginal incident so early in the move. He described the intervention as a “massive overreach” of a system meant to correct only “clear and obvious errors”.

The former referee noted that although there was slight foot-on-foot contact and a brief shirt pull, neither action was serious enough to cancel a goal after such a long attacking sequence.

That distinction made Egypt’s grievance more layered: the disallowed goal appeared to be a major VAR mistake, but the stoppage-time penalty claim was far less convincing. 

Why the VAR call hurt Egypt so deeply

  Some decisions wound teams more than others. A tight offside is painful, but objective. A handball in the box can be disputed, but at least it is close to the scoring action. Egypt’s frustration came from the feeling that VAR had reached too far back into the move.

The disallowed goal was not caused by an obvious foul in the penalty area. It did not come after a clear push before the finish. It came after a challenge far away from the eventual shot, in a phase from which Argentina still had time to defend.

For Egypt, this was the moment the match changed shape.

Salah penalty appeal: Egypt’s weaker case

  If Egypt had a strong argument over the disallowed goal, their late penalty appeal was less convincing.

Hassan insisted Salah should have been awarded a penalty shortly before Fernandez’s winner. Egypt saw contact and demanded intervention. In the heat of the moment, the non-call felt like another injustice in a match they believed had already turned against them.

But not every appeal carries the same weight. The contact on Salah appeared minor, and the claim did not look strong enough to demand a VAR overturn.  However, former referee Scott did not support this Egypt’s complaints. He said the late penalty appeal involving Mohamed Salah, shortly before Enzo Fernandez’s winner, was rightly dismissed. There was contact on Salah’s boot, but not enough, in his assessment, to award a penalty.

That does not erase Egypt’s anger. It does, however, show why this match will be debated in layers rather than reduced to one call.

Why Egypt’s bench was shown cards

The late drama also raised another question for many watching: can support staff receive yellow and red cards?

Yes, they can.

Football’s Laws of the Game allow referees to caution or dismiss team officials for misconduct. This includes not only the head coach but also assistant coaches, goalkeeping coaches, fitness trainers, analysts, doctors, physiotherapists and other accredited members of the technical area.

The rule exists because the modern bench is no longer passive. Coaches and staff constantly instruct players, challenge decisions, speak to substitutes and place pressure on the fourth official. When that behaviour crosses the line, referees can use cards to discipline them.

A yellow card can be shown for dissent, repeatedly leaving the technical area, delaying restarts, sarcastic gestures, provoking opponents or ignoring instructions from officials. A red card can be shown for offensive or abusive language, threatening behaviour, confronting match officials, entering the field to interfere with play, throwing objects or violent conduct.

In Atlanta, the rule became part of the spectacle because Egypt’s anger was no longer limited to the players. The bench itself had become a participant in the storm.

Touchline fury becomes part of the match

As Egypt protested Fernandez’s stoppage-time winner and the earlier non-call on Salah, Letexier showed a red card to a member of Egypt’s coaching staff. Hassan was cautioned. Goalkeeper Mostafa Shobeir was also shown a yellow card.

For Egypt, those cards felt like punishment for outrage. For the referee, they were a response to a technical area that had boiled over.

The truth is that both things can coexist. Egypt’s anger had context, especially after the disallowed Ziko goal. But referees are also expected to control the bench once protests become persistent, aggressive or disruptive.

Hassan’s scheduling complaint adds another layer

Hassan’s frustration did not stop with VAR or refereeing. He also criticised the timing of the match.

“Whoever schedules these matches is someone who has never played football. You never schedule a football match at 12 noon,” he said.

That complaint widened Egypt’s grievance. Hassan was not only arguing that decisions went against his team. He was arguing that the conditions of the match were wrong too.

To him, the scheduling, the VAR call, the late penalty appeal and the touchline punishments became part of a broader unfairness. Whether everyone accepts that framing is another matter, but it explains why Egypt’s reaction after the match was so fierce.

Hassan did not see one bad decision. He saw a night tilted away from his team.

Messi’s shadow over every decision

No Argentina World Cup match exists outside Lionel Messi’s orbit.

That is what made Hassan’s comments so pointed. When he asked whether there was a desire to keep Messi in the tournament, he touched a nerve that often follows global icons. The bigger the player, the louder the suspicion when close calls appear to benefit his team.

Egypt will see it differently. For them, Messi’s presence made the night feel more loaded. When football’s most marketable figure survives a scare through a disputed comeback, suspicion comes easily to the defeated side.

That does not prove Egypt’s strongest claims. But it explains why the defeat felt larger than a football match.

Messi’s magic, in this case, arrived wrapped in controversy.

Argentina’s escape: Character or fortune?

Argentina will not apologise for surviving.

World Cup knockout football rarely rewards purity. It rewards nerve, endurance and decisive moments. Argentina were in danger, but they did not collapse. They dragged themselves back into the contest and struck late.

That is the version they will carry forward: the world champions passed through fire and lived.

But Atlanta also exposed them. A side that falls 2-0 behind in a Round of 16 match has been vulnerable.  

Argentina’s aura remains, but it is no longer spotless.

Their quarter-final opponents will have seen both sides: the fragility that let Egypt dream, and the champion instinct that crushed that dream in the final minutes.

Egypt’s exit will not fade quickly

Ziko’s immediate reaction captured the emotional wreckage.

“We are so sorry,” he said to the people of Egypt. “We wanted to make you all happy.”

Then came the accusation that will follow this match.

“The cup is directed towards Argentina.”

Those words will be debated, dismissed, amplified and replayed. For Egypt, they will become shorthand for a night when a historic opportunity seemed within reach and then disappeared in a blur of VAR, protests and late Argentine punishment.

Hassan’s declaration that he would “never watch the World Cup again” may have come from the rawness of defeat, but it revealed how deeply the match had cut.

Egypt did not leave Atlanta feeling they had lost only to Argentina. They left feeling beaten by the event itself.