Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Sports

Updated All-Time AP Football Polls by Program and Year

Published

on


  By SuperWest Sports Staff


The Associated Press (AP) Football Poll has run continuously since 1936. Up to 1960, the poll ranked only 20 teams. From 1961 to 1967, it was reduced to just the Top 10.

The Poll returned to ranking the Top 20 teams in 1968, retaining that format through 1988. In 1989, it was expanded to the Top 25 and has not altered its count since.

Initially, AP did not conduct a preseason poll, adding it in 1950.

Advertisement

Through 1968, except for the 1965 poll, AP crowned its national football champion after the regular season, before the bowl games were played.

That changed in 1964, when the regular-season AP champ, Alabama, lost the Orange Bowl to Texas.

Consequently, the news organization made plans to hold its poll after the bowl season, beginning in 1967, to award its national title.

Below you will find tables for the top football programs in the West, including:

Advertisement
  • The years in which they have appeared in the AP Poll
  • The number of appearances for each season
  • The percentage of the season in which they were ranked
  • Their high and low rankings for each year
  • Their preseason and final rankings, if any

Following those lists is a table with the total number of polls each program has appeared in its history.

USC leads the way in that category, having missed just five of the 90 all-time polls (as of the 2025 Final Poll).

Air Force
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2023 3 19% NR 17 22 NR
2019 3 18% NR 22 25 22
2010 2 13% NR 23 25 NR
2002 3 17% NR 18 22 NR
1999 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
1998 8 50% NR 13 25 13
1997 6 33% NR 18 24 NR
1995 1 6% NR 21 21 NR
1991 1 6% NR 25 25 25
1989 4 24% NR 17 24 NR
1985 13 76% NR 4 19 8
1983 4 25% NR 13 18 13
1972 4 27% NR 16 19 NR
1971 2 13% NR 18 20 NR
1970 13 87% NR 7 20 16
1969 4 29% NR 19 20 NR
1959 5 38% 15 15 18 NR
1958 7 58% NR 6 14 6

*Air Force has been ranked in 18 out of 90 polls.


Arizona football Pac-12Arizona
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 2 12% NR 21 22 NR
2024 3 18% 21 20 21 NR
2023 6 38% NR 11 23 11
2017 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2015 4 25% 22 16 22 NR
2014 11 65% NR 8 21 19
2012 3 19% NR 22 24 NR
2010 11 69% NR 9 24 NR
2009 4 25% NR 18 23 NR
2000 3 18% NR 21 24 NR
1999 4 24% 4 4 19 NR
1998 16 100% 24 4 24 4
1995 5 29% 19 17 25 NR
1994 17 100% 7 6 20 20
1993 17 100% 14 7 19 10
1992 8 47% NR 9 23 NR
1990 7 44% NR 16 25 NR
1989 9 53% 18 15 25 25
1986 13 87% NR 10 17 11
1983 8 50% 14 3 19 NR
1975 15 100% 16 11 18 18
1974 9 60% 17 9 19 NR
1973 2 13% NR 19 19 NR
1968 1 7% NR 19 19 NR

*Arizona has been ranked in 24 out of 90 polls.


Arizona State
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 5 29% 11 11 25 NR
2024 5 29% NR 7 21 7
2021 5 31% 25 18 25 NR
2019 5 29% NR 17 24 NR
2018 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2015 1 6% 15 15 15 NR
2014 16 94% 19 7 20 12
2013 10 59% NR 11 25 20
2011 7 44% NR 18 25 NR
2008 3 18% 15 15 15 NR
2007 12 75% NR 6 23 16
2006 4 25% 24 22 25 NR
2005 6 38% 20 14 20 NR
2004 13 81% NR 15 23 19
2003 4 24% 22 16 22 NR
2002 3 17% NR 16 25 NR
1999 4 24% 25 22 25 NR
1998 2 13% 8 8 14 NR
1997 13 72% NR 12 25 14
1996 18 100% 20 2 20 4
1993 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
1991 2 13% NR 24 25 NR
1990 3 19% NR 21 25 NR
1987 7 44% 14 12 20 20
1986 13 87% NR 4 18 4
1984 2 13% 13 12 13 NR
1983 4 25% NR 13 20 NR
1982 16 100% 19 3 19 6
1981 13 87% 20 9 20 16
1980 1 6% NR 20 20 NR
1979 1 7% 18 18 18 NR
1978 2 13% NR 12 14 NR
1977 8 57% 17 12 20 18
1976 2 14% 3 3 18 NR
1975 13 87% NR 2 18 2
1974 10 67% 15 7 18 NR
1973 15 100% 14 8 14 9
1972 12 80% 12 10 19 13
1971 15 100% 14 8 16 8
1970 14 93% 19 6 20 6
1969 1 7% NR 18 18 NR
1968 5 36% 17 14 20 NR
1960 1 8% NR 18 18 NR
1957 3 25% NR 11 17 12

*Arizona State has been ranked in 44 out of 90 polls.


Boise State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 1 6% 25 25 25 NR
2024 13 76% NR 8 25 8
2020 2 12% NR 21 25 NR
2019 16 94% NR 14 24 23
2018 8 50% 22 17 23 23
2017 3 19% NR 22 25 22
2016 9 56% NR 13 24 NR
2015 4 25% 23 20 25 NR
2014 4 24% NR 16 25 16
2013 1 6% 19 19 19 NR
2012 10 63% 24 18 25 18
2011 16 100% 5 4 10 8
2010 16 100% 3 2 10 9
2009 16 100% 14 4 14 4
2008 13 76% NR 9 19 11
2007 8 50% 24 17 24 NR
2006 13 81% NR 5 25 5
2005 1 6% 18 18 18 NR
2004 14 88% NR 10 23 12
2003 6 35% NR 16 24 16
2002 5 28% NR 15 23 15

*Boise State has been ranked in 21 out of 90 polls.


BYU
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 13 76% NR 8 25 11
2024 13 76% NR 7 22 13
2022 6 38% 25 12 25 NR
2021 13 81% NR 10 25 19
2020 16 94% NR 8 22 11
2018 2 13% NR 20 25 NR
2015 2 13% NR 19 22 NR
2014 4 24% NR 18 25 NR
2012 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
2009 15 94% 20 7 25 12
2008 17 100% 16 8 25 25
2007 4 25% NR 14 23 14
2006 6 38% NR 16 25 16
2001 14 82% NR 8 25 25
1999 9 53% NR 15 25 NR
1997 6 33% 19 19 24 NR
1996 16 89% NR 5 24 5
1994 10 59% NR 18 25 18
1993 7 41% 19 19 21 NR
1992 5 29% 24 24 25 NR
1991 4 25% 19 19 25 23
1990 16 100% 16 4 22 22
1989 13 76% 19 18 25 22
1988 1 6% NR 20 20 NR
1986 3 20% 18 11 18 NR
1985 17 100% 10 7 18 16
1984 15 94% NR 1 13 1
1983 11 69% NR 7 20 7
1981 12 80% 16 8 18 13
1980 9 56% NR 12 19 12
1979 11 73% NR 9 20 13
1977 12 86% NR 13 20 20
1974 2 13% NR 17 20 NR

*BYU has been ranked in 33 out of 90 polls.


California
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2019 2 12% NR 15 23 NR
2018 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
2015 4 25% NR 20 24 NR
2009 8 50% 12 6 24 NR
2008 3 18% NR 21 25 NR
2007 10 63% 12 2 24 NR
2006 16 100% 9 8 22 14
2005 11 69% 19 10 25 25
2004 16 100% 12 4 12 9
2002 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
1996 2 11% NR 19 21 NR
1993 6 35% NR 16 25 25
1992 4 24% 20 17 24 NR
1991 13 81% NR 6 24 8
1977 5 36% NR 14 20 NR
1976 1 7% 15 15 15 NR
1975 6 40% NR 11 18 14
1974 4 27% NR 18 20 NR
1968 7 50% NR 8 18 NR
1958 3 25% NR 16 19 16
1954 3 25% 12 12 18 NR
1953 2 18% 14 14 16 NR
1952 6 55% 8 3 11 NR
1951 11 100% 5 1 19 12
1950 10 100% 14 4 14 5
1949 9 100% NA 2 10 3
1948 9 100% NA 4 9 4
1947 10 100% NA 4 15 15
1944 1 11% NA 12 12 NR
1943 1 11% NA 20 20 NR
1938 8 100% NA 3 14 14
1937 7 100% NA 1 2 2

*Cal has been ranked in 32 out of 90 polls.


Colorado
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2024 8 47% NR 16 25 25
2023 3 19% NR 18 22 NR
2020 1 6% NR 21 21 NR
2018 2 13% NR 19 21 NR
2016 9 56% NR 9 23 17
2005 3 19% NR 22 25 NR
2003 2 12% NR 17 24 NR
2002 14 78% 7 7 23 20
2001 11 65% NR 3 25 9
2000 2 12% 24 23 24 NR
1999 2 12% 15 14 15 NR
1998 8 50% NR 14 24 NR
1997 8 44% 8 8 24 NR
1996 18 100% 5 5 12 8
1995 17 100% 13 4 14 5
1994 17 100% 8 2 8 3
1993 17 100% 11 7 23 16
1992 17 100% 12 7 16 13
1991 16 100% 13 12 25 20
1990 16 100% 5 1 20 1
1989 17 100% 14 1 14 4
1988 1 6% NR 19 19 NR
1978 4 27% NR 13 19 NR
1977 8 57% 12 3 15 NR
1976 7 50% NR 12 19 16
1975 11 73% NR 9 19 16
1973 7 47% 11 10 19 NR
1972 15 100% 2 2 16 16
1971 14 93% NR 3 13 3
1970 6 40% NR 8 19 NR
1969 2 14% NR 16 18 16
1967 8 67% 10 3 10 NR
1961 8 67% NR 6 10 7
1960 1 8% NR 18 18 NR
1958 3 25% NR 9 19 NR
1957 1 8% NR 18 18 NR
1956 4 33% NR 18 20 20
1955 2 17% NR 14 20 NR
1954 2 17% NR 11 17 NR
1937 4 57% NA 16 17 17

*Colorado has been ranked in 40 out of 90 polls.

Colorado State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2014 3 18% NR 21 23 NR
2003 1 6% 23 23 23 NR
2002 11 61% NR 16 25 NR
2001 2 12% 24 24 24 NR
2000 3 18% NR 14 23 14
1999 2 12% NR 23 24 NR
1998 1 6% 15 15 15 NR
1997 8 44% NR 17 25 17
1994 12 71% NR 10 24 16

*Colorado State has been ranked in 9 out of 90 polls.


Fresno State
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2023 2 13% NR 24 25 NR
2022 1 6% NR 24 24 24
2021 3 19% NR 18 25 NR
2018 5 31% NR 16 25 18
2017 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
2013 12 71% NR 15 25 NR
2008 5 29% NR 21 25 NR
2005 10 63% 24 16 24 NR
2004 4 25% NR 17 22 22
2001 11 65% NR 8 23 NR
1993 2 12% NR 25 25 NR
1992 1 6% NR 24 24 24
1991 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1990 2 13% NR 24 24 NR
1989 3 18% NR 23 25 NR
1986 1 7% NR 19 19 NR
1942 1 13% NR 18 18 NR

*Fresno State has been ranked in 17 out of 90 polls.

Hawai’i
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2010 2 13% NR 24 25 NR
2007 16 100% 23 10 24 19
2006 2 13% NR 24 25 NR
1992 2 12% NR 20 24 20
1989 5 29% NR 23 25 NR
1981 1 7% NR 19 19 NR

*Hawai’i has been ranked in 6 out of 90 polls.

Nevada
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2010 10 63% NR 11 25 11
1948 6 67% N/A 10 19 NR

*Nevada has been ranked in 2 out of 90 polls.

New Mexico

No appearances.


Oregon Ducks Logo Pac-12Oregon
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 17 100% 7 2 8 4
2024 17 100% 3 1 9 3
2023 16 100% 15 5 15 6
2022 15 94% 11 6 25 15
2021 16 100% 11 3 22 22
2020 12 71% 9 9 25 NR
2019 17 100% 11 5 16 5
2018 9 56% 24 12 24 NR
2017 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
2016 3 19% 24 22 24 NR
2015 9 56% 7 7 23 19
2014 17 100% 3 2 12 2
2013 17 100% 3 2 12 9
2012 16 100% 5 1 6 2
2011 16 100% 3 3 13 4
2010 16 100% 11 1 11 3
2009 13 81% 16 7 16 11
2008 11 65% 21 10 24 10
2007 13 81% NR 2 23 23
2006 11 69% 21 11 25 NR
2005 12 75% NR 6 25 12
2004 2 13% 23 23 24 NR
2003 3 18% NR 10 22 NR
2002 13 72% 15 6 23 NR
2001 17 100% 7 2 11 2
2000 12 71% NR 5 20 7
1999 2 12% NR 19 25 19
1998 14 88% NR 11 24 NR
1996 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1995 15 88% NR 10 24 18
1994 7 41% NR 11 21 11
1990 5 31% NR 19 25 NR
1989 2 12% NR 22 23 NR
1988 3 18% NR 18 20 NR
1987 1 6% NR 16 16 NR
1970 2 13% NR 16 19 NR
1964 2 18% NR 7 10 NR
1960 1 8% NR 19 19 NR
1959 5 38% NR 11 16 NR
1958 2 17% NR 14 15 NR
1957 5 42% NR 13 18 NR
1956 1 8% NR 18 18 NR
1954 2 17% 18 16 18 NR
1948 6 67% NA 9 16 9
1946 1 11% NA 19 19 NR
1941 1 13% NA 16 16 NR
1939 1 11% NA 11 11 NR

*Oregon has been ranked in 47 out of 90 polls.


Oregon State
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2023 15 94% 18 10 21 NR
2022 6 38% NR 16 25 17
2013 1 6% 25 25 25 NR
2012 12 75% NR 7 20 20
2010 4 25% 24 24 25 NR
2009 4 25% NR 13 20 NR
2008 6 35% NR 17 25 18
2007 1 6% NR 25 25 25
2006 2 13% NR 21 24 21
2003 2 12% NR 22 24 NR
2002 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2001 5 29% 11 10 22 NR
2000 11 65% NR 4 23 4
1968 10 71% 6 6 20 15
1967 3 25% NR 7 8 7
1964 3 27% NR 8 8 8
1960 4 33% NR 10 18 NR
1958 1 8% 12 12 12 NR
1957 6 50% 13 7 19 NR
1956 6 50% NR 10 17 10
1955 1 8% NR 19 19 NR
1951 2 18% NR 15 18 NR
1941 5 63% NA 12 18 12
1940 2 25% NA 18 19 NR
1939 3 33% NA 11 19 NR

*Oregon State has been ranked in 25 out of 90 polls.


San Diego State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2021 8 50% NR 19 25 25
2019 2 12% NR 24 25 NR
2017 4 25% NR 19 22 NR
2016 4 25% NR 19 25 25
1995 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1992 2 12% NR 21 23 NR
1977 3 21% NR 16 16 16
1975 2 13% NR 13 18 NR
1974 1 7% NR 20 20 NR
1970 5 33% NR 14 17 NR

*San Diego State has been ranked in 10 out of 90 polls.

San Jose State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2020 3 18% NR 19 25 24
2012 2 13% NR 21 24 21
1975 1 7% NR 20 20 NR
1939 2 22% N/A 18 19 NR

*San Jose State has been ranked in 4 out of 90 polls.


Stanford
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2019 2 12% 25 23 25 NR
2018 7 44% 13 7 24 NR
2017 12 75% 14 14 23 20
2016 9 56% 8 7 17 12
2015 14 88% 21 3 21 3
2014 8 47% 11 11 25 NR
2013 17 100% 4 4 13 11
2012 16 100% 21 7 25 7
2011 16 100% 7 3 8 7
2010 15 94% NR 4 25 4
2009 4 25% NR 14 25 NR
2001 11 65% NR 10 23 16
1999 2 12% NR 22 22 NR
1997 9 50% 18 16 25 NR
1995 4 24% NR 16 23 NR
1994 2 12% NR 24 25 NR
1993 5 29% 15 15 23 NR
1992 17 100% 17 8 21 9
1991 5 31% NR 17 22 22
1986 5 33% NR 16 20 NR
1981 2 13% 18 18 19 NR
1980 6 38% 15 11 20 NR
1979 1 7% 13 13 13 NR
1978 4 27% NR 17 20 17
1977 1 7% NR 15 15 15
1975 2 13% 20 18 20 NR
1974 2 13% NR 19 20 NR
1972 7 47% 20 13 20 NR
1971 15 100% 19 10 19 10
1970 15 100% 10 3 13 8
1969 13 93% 16 13 19 19
1968 2 14% NR 14 18 NR
1957 2 17% NR 16 17 NR
1956 4 33% 14 10 20 NR
1955 4 33% NR 16 20 16
1954 1 8% NR 17 17 NR
1953 7 64% NR 11 20 19
1952 2 18% 13 13 13 NR
1951 9 82% NR 3 19 7
1950 4 40% 7 6 8 NR
1949 3 33% NA 12 17 NR
1946 1 11% NA 17 17 NR
1942 2 25% NA 12 12 12
1941 5 63% NA 6 19 NR
1940 8 100% NA 2 10 2
1937 1 14% NA 13 13 NR

*Stanford has been ranked in 46 out of 90 polls.

UNLV
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2024 6 35% NR 19 25 23

*UNLV has been ranked in 1 out of 90 polls.


UCLA
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2023 6 38% NR 18 25 NR
2022 11 69% NR 9 21 21
2021 4 25% NR 13 24 NR
2017 1 6% NR 16 25 NR
2016 1 6% 16 16 16 NR
2015 11 69% 13 7 24 NR
2014 16 94% 7 7 25 10
2013 17 100% 21 9 22 16
2012 9 56% NR 15 25 NR
2008 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2007 3 19% 14 11 14 NR
2005 13 81% NR 7 25 16
2002 3 17% NR 20 25 NR
2001 12 71% 17 4 20 NR
2000 7 41% NR 6 23 NR
1999 5 29% 16 14 21 NR
1998 16 100% 7 2 8 8
1997 14 78% NR 5 24 5
1995 7 41% 16 12 24 NR
1994 5 29% 14 13 18 NR
1993 11 65% NR 10 25 18
1992 7 41% 18 11 19 NR
1991 10 63% 24 19 25 19
1990 2 13% 19 19 19 NR
1989 6 35% 9 6 25 NR
1988 17 100% 5 1 9 6
1987 16 100% 3 3 13 9
1986 14 93% 4 4 19 14
1985 15 88% 20 7 20 7
1984 10 63% 5 4 19 9
1983 2 13% 20 17 20 17
1982 16 100% 20 5 20 5
1981 10 67% 13 6 19 NR
1980 13 81% NR 2 18 13
1979 2 13% NR 17 20 NR
1978 15 100% 12 8 18 14
1977 5 36% 11 11 20 NR
1976 14 100% 17 2 17 15
1975 13 87% 14 5 19 5
1974 4 27% 12 12 18 NR
1973 15 100% 10 8 18 12
1972 14 93% NR 6 15 15
1971 1 7% 15 15 15 NR
1970 10 67% 18 13 19 NR
1969 14 100% 17 6 17 13
1968 4 29% 16 8 16 NR
1967 11 92% 8 1 8 NR
1966 13 100% 4 2 8 5
1965 6 46% NR 4 8 4
1961 1 8% NR 9 9 NR
1960 8 67% NR 8 19 NR
1959 2 15% NR 17 20 NR
1957 2 17% NR 15 19 NR
1956 2 17% 17 17 19 NR
1955 12 100% 1 1 9 4
1954 12 100% 8 1 8 2
1953 11 100% 4 4 12 5
1952 11 100% 18 3 18 6
1951 3 27% NR 15 18 17
1950 4 40% NR 13 19 NR
1949 3 33% NA 13 20 NR
1947 6 60% NA 16 19 NR
1946 9 100% NA 4 5 4
1945 1 11% NA 12 12 NR
1942 7 88% NA 10 18 13
1939 7 78% NA 7 19 7

*UCLA has been ranked in 66 out of 90 polls.


usc logoUSC
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 11 65% NR 16 25 20
2024 6 35% 23 11 23 NR
2023 10 63% 6 5 24 NR
2022 16 100% 14 4 14 12
2021 2 13% 15 14 15 NR
2020 13 76% 17 13 25 21
2019 5 29% NR 21 25 NR
2018 3 19% 15 15 22 NR
2017 16 100% 4 4 21 12
2016 6 38% 20 3 20 3
2015 8 50% 8 6 24 NR
2014 11 65% 15 9 24 20
2013 5 29% 24 19 25 19
2012 12 75% 1 1 21 NR
2011 10 63% 25 5 25 6
2010 7 44% 14 14 24 NR
2009 15 94% 4 3 24 22
2008 17 100% 3 1 9 3
2007 16 100% 1 1 13 3
2006 16 100% 6 2 9 4
2005 16 100% 1 1 2 2
2004 16 100% 1 1 1 1
2003 17 100% 8 1 10 1
2002 18 100% 20 4 20 4
2000 7 41% 15 8 18 NR
1999 6 35% 19 16 22 NR
1998 5 31% NR 18 22 NR
1997 4 22% 22 22 23 NR
1996 7 39% 7 7 19 NR
1995 17 100% 7 5 18 12
1994 14 82% 17 13 25 13
1993 2 12% 18 18 22 NR
1992 12 71% NR 11 23 NR
1991 3 19% 16 16 22 NR
1990 16 100% 9 5 23 20
1989 17 100% 5 5 13 8
1988 17 100% 6 2 8 7
1987 5 31% 19 16 19 18
1986 9 60% NR 9 18 NR
1985 5 29% 6 3 18 NR
1984 11 69% NR 7 20 10
1983 4 25% 8 8 14 NR
1982 16 100% 10 10 19 15
1981 15 100% 5 1 14 14
1980 16 100% 4 2 17 11
1979 15 100% 1 1 4 2
1978 15 100% 9 2 9 2
1977 12 86% 4 1 20 13
1976 13 93% 8 2 19 2
1975 12 80% 5 3 17 17
1974 15 100% 5 2 18 2
1973 15 100% 1 1 9 8
1972 15 100% 8 1 8 1
1971 9 60% 5 5 20 20
1970 12 80% 3 3 18 15
1969 14 100% 5 3 7 3
1968 14 100% 2 1 4 4
1967 12 100% 7 1 7 1
1966 11 85% 9 5 10 NR
1965 11 85% 7 4 10 10
1964 2 18% NR 2 10 10
1963 4 31% 1 1 8 NR
1962 11 92% NR 1 9 1
1960 1 8% 6 6 6 NR
1959 12 92% NR 4 14 14
1957 1 8% 19 19 19 NR
1956 11 92% 15 6 20 18
1955 9 75% 13 9 16 13
1954 11 92% 17 7 17 17
1953 10 91% 8 7 20 NR
1952 11 100% 16 2 16 5
1951 8 73% NR 6 20 NR
1950 1 10% 12 12 12 NR
1949 6 67% NA 8 19 NR
1947 10 100% NA 3 20 8
1946 4 44% NA 10 16 NR
1945 5 56% NA 6 20 11
1944 7 78% NA 7 15 7
1943 6 67% NA 4 10 NR
1942 2 25% NA 14 16 NR
1940 2 25% NA 17 17 NR
1939 9 100% NA 1 8 3
1938 7 88% NA 7 19 7
1937 1 14% NA 11 11 NR
1936 4 57% NA 6 15 NR

*USC has been ranked in 85 out of 90 polls.


Utah
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 12 71% NR 13 25 14
2024 7 41% 12 10 18 NR
2023 12 75% 14 10 18 NR
2022 16 100% 7 7 20 10
2021 7 44% 24 10 24 12
2020 1 6% 22 22 22 NR
2019 17 100% 14 5 19 16
2018 6 38% NR 16 23 NR
2017 3 19% NR 20 23 NR
2016 11 69% NR 11 24 23
2015 14 88% NR 3 24 17
2014 10 59% NR 18 25 21
2010 14 88% NR 6 25 NR
2009 12 75% 19 16 24 18
2008 16 94% NR 2 22 2
2004 16 100% 20 4 20 4
2003 3 18% NR 21 25 21
1996 4 22% NR 20 24 NR
1994 11 65% NR 9 25 10
1947 1 10% NA 18 18 NR

*Utah has been ranked in 20 out of 90 polls.

Utah State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2021 1 6% NR 24 24 24
2018 5 31% NR 14 22 22
2012 4 25% NR 16 25 16
1961 1 8% NR 10 10 10
1960 2 17% NR 18 19 NR

*Utah State has been ranked in 5 out of 90 polls.


Washington football pac-12Washington
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
2023 16 100% 10 2 10 2
2022 9 56% NR 8 24 8
2021 1 6% 20 20 20 NR
2020 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2019 7 41% 13 13 25 NR
2018 15 94% 6 6 20 13
2017 16 100% 8 5 16 16
2016 16 100% 14 4 14 4
2014 1 6% 25 25 25 NR
2013 8 47% NR 15 25 25
2012 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2011 1 6% NR 22 22 NR
2009 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
2003 6 35% 17 17 22 NR
2002 9 50% 9 9 22 NR
2001 17 100% 15 8 21 19
2000 17 100% 13 3 15 3
1999 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
1998 5 31% 18 9 20 NR
1997 18 100% 4 2 21 18
1996 14 78% NR 12 25 16
1995 16 94% 24 15 24 NR
1994 13 76% 23 9 25 NR
1993 11 65% 12 12 25 NR
1992 17 100% 2 1 11 11
1991 16 100% 4 2 4 2
1990 16 100% 20 2 22 5
1989 4 24% NR 11 23 23
1988 7 41% NR 16 20 NR
1987 5 31% 13 10 18 NR
1986 15 100% 16 6 18 18
1985 2 12% 12 12 12 NR
1984 16 100% 18 1 19 2
1983 12 75% 18 9 20 NR
1982 16 100% 2 1 13 7
1981 11 73% 15 10 18 10
1980 10 63% 20 13 20 16
1979 15 100% 15 6 20 11
1978 5 33% 11 11 20 NR
1977 4 29% NR 10 19 10
1972 8 53% 9 9 18 NR
1971 10 67% NR 11 20 19
1970 1 7% NR 20 20 NR
1964 2 18% 7 7 10 NR
1963 1 8% 10 10 10 NR
1962 6 50% 10 7 10 NR
1960 12 100% 3 3 13 6
1959 8 62% NR 8 18 8
1955 4 33% NR 12 19 NR
1952 1 9% NR 17 17 NR
1951 3 27% 8 8 20 NR
1950 8 80% NR 10 19 11
1945 2 22% NA 18 18 NR
1943 7 78% NA 11 19 12
1941 1 13% NA 20 20 NR
1940 8 100% NA 10 17 10
1937 1 14% NA 13 13 NR
1936 7 100% NA 4 10 5

*Washington has been ranked in 59 out of 90 polls.


Washington State
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2024 4 24% NR 19 25 NR
2023 5 31% NR 13 23 NR
2019 4 24% 23 19 23 NR
2018 9 56% NR 7 25 10
2017 15 94% 24 8 25 NR
2016 4 25% NR 20 25 NR
2015 2 13% NR 20 24 NR
2006 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
2003 14 82% NR 6 24 9
2002 18 100% 11 3 17 10
2001 10 59% NR 9 19 10
1997 14 78% NR 8 19 9
1994 13 76% NR 16 24 21
1993 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1992 9 53% NR 13 25 15
1989 7 41% NR 15 23 NR
1988 6 35% NR 16 20 16
1981 7 47% NR 14 20 NR
1977 1 7% NR 15 15 NR
1972 5 33% NR 19 20 19
1958 1 8% NR 10 10 NR
1957 1 8% NR 19 19 NR
1952 1 9% 15 15 15 NR
1951 7 64% NR 16 18 18
1942 5 63% NA 10 17 17
1941 1 13% NA 19 19 19
1940 1 13% NA 19 19 NR
1936 4 57% NA 14 20 NR

*Washington State has been ranked in 28 out of 90 polls.

Wyoming
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
1998 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1996 12 67% NR 16 25 22
1993 2 12% NR 23 24 NR
1990 5 31% NR 18 25 NR
1988 11 65% NR 10 18 NR
1969 5 36% NR 15 19 NR
1968 4 29% NR 19 20 NR
1967 7 58% NR 6 10 6
1966 1 8% NR 10 10 NR
1959 2 15% NR 16 16 16
1956 1 8% NR 19 19 NR
1950 5 50% NR 12 18 12

*Wyoming has been ranked in 12 out of 90 polls.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

Champions League: Bayern win in Madrid and eye semifinal spot – Sports

Published

on

One of your browser extensions seems to be blocking the video player from loading. To watch this content, you may need to disable it on this site.

Bayern's Harry Kane, left, and teammate Joshua Kimmich look at the fans after the first leg of the Champions League quarter-final football match between Real Madrid and Bayern Munich in Madrid, Spain
Bayern’s Harry Kane, left, and teammate Joshua Kimmich look at the fans after the first leg of the Champions League quarter-final football match between Real Madrid and Bayern Munich in Madrid, Spain on Tuesday, April 7,2026. © Jose Breton, AP

From the show

Advertisement

Sports


Reading time
1 min

Bayern Munich won 2-1 away at Real Madrid in the first leg of the Champions League quarterfinals. The second leg will take place in Munich on April 15.

Arsenal won away at Sporting. Paul Seixas showed utter dominance in Tour of the Basque Country stage 2. In tennis, Gaël Monfils played his last game in Monte-Carlo tournament, while Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner made short work of their opponents.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Bettors backing Michigan on 2027 NCAA championship futures

Published

on

Now that I’ve had a little time to process Michigan beating UConn in the men’s national championship game Monday night, ending the Wolverines’ four-game skid in title games and giving the Big Ten its first championship since 2000, I can start to at least picture the 2026-27 season. And to no surprise in the NIL era, it is the wealthy blue-bloods like Duke and the Wolverines who have opened atop the BetMGM board.

Fans who want to wager on college basketball can check out the latest BetMGM promo code for the best offer.

Michigan was never close to an underdog in this this year’s tournament in becoming the first school all-time to start five transfers in a national title game. It was clearly the best team, finishing with a plus-114 point margin, the seventh-highest total ever by a national champion and sixth-best since the field expanded in 1985. 

Favorites went a whopping 49-18 SU in the dance (that’s NIL talking) — including one run of 22 straight wins — and 36-31 ATS. It finished as the highest-scoring tournament (averaged 149.7 PPG) since 1993 and featured the highest points-per-game differential (+14.4) since 1993. Freshmen totaled their most points ever.

Advertisement

Should Michigan return to the championship game on April 5, 2027, it would basically have home-court advantage because next year’s Final Four is at Ford Field in Detroit (though technically Michigan State is the host). The Spartans had been the last Big Ten school to win it all in men’s hoops, in 2000. How long ago was that? No current Michigan player was alive, and head coach Dusty May was Indiana’s student manager.

There already has been some decent futures movement at BetMGM even with the 2027 national championship odds not having been active long. Duke, the only non-Big Ten team to beat the Wolverines this season, opened +1100 but is now +800. So is Michigan, which was +1300 for next season entering the title game but has taken the most handle (34.3%) and tickets (14.9%) so far. Duke is second in both, with Florida third. 

I sure would have liked to have seen a Duke-Michigan rematch on Monday, but UConn of course staged that epic comeback in the Elite Eight. The transfer portal is currently open, so there’s not much point giving out any 2026-27 recommendations yet.

Fans who want to get in on college basketball action can check out the DraftKings promo code for a great offer.

Advertisement

I’ll also address the University of North Carolina, which hasn’t moved from its open of +2500 at BetMGM but is taking just 2.0% of tickets and 1.8% of handle. The Tar Heels were rejected by the likes of May, Arizona’s Tommy Lloyd and Iowa State’s TJ Otzelberger for their head coach opening, so perhaps school officials panicked a bit in hiring Michael Malone. He is UNC’s first hire outside of the Tar Heels “family” since Frank McGuire in 1952. 

Yes, Malone won the NBA championship with the Denver Nuggets in the 2022-23 season but was fired in 2024-25 and has never been a college head coach — and not even an assistant at that level since 2001 at Manhattan. Malone is well-respected for his X’s and O’s acumen and has spent the past 10-plus months as an ESPN analyst. Such a baffling hire, as Malone had no formal ties to North Carolina other than his daughter Bridget being a sophomore on UNC’s volleyball team.

Reportedly, the Heels felt they had to make a move quickly with the transfer portal opening and could not wait on a decision from Chicago Bulls coach Billy Donovan, a two-time national championship coach at Florida. Donovan wasn’t going to make a decision until the Bulls’ season ended on April 12, but the team just overhauled its front office so he likely leaves anyways.

Again, it’s not clear exactly what the Heels might look like next season with the portal currently open – a few UNC guys have already entered, led by former four-star freshman and starting point guard Derek Dixon. Malone has no modern-day recruiting experience (he does have a connection with prominent international agent Misko Raznatovic through Nuggets superstar Nikola Jokic), but UNC surely will be a preseason AP Top 25 club on name alone.

Advertisement

Superstar freshman Caleb Wilson is a goner as a top-10 NBA Draft pick, but 7-footer Henri Veesaar is an All-America-level player if Malone can keep him around. UNC’s current recruiting class sits 29th nationally on sister site 247Sports’ composite rankings, led by four-star guard Dylan Mingo, who is ranked as the No. 8 player in the country.

When looking at the below odds, again notice no West Coast teams among the favorites (with the Pac-12 coming back). We still haven’t had a team from out West win the dance since Arizona in 1997, although the UCLA women won their first crown Sunday. 

If you plan to bet on college basketball, check out our FanDuel promo code and get a great offer when you sign up.

BetMGM 2027 national championship favorites

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Vikings Eye Under-the-Radar Badgers Sleeper

Published

on

Advertisement

Badgers defender Mason Reiger against the Redhawks
Aug 28, 2025; Madison, Wisconsin, USA; Wisconsin Badgers linebacker Mason Reiger (22) celebrates a play during the game against the Miami (OH) RedHawks at Camp Randall Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Hanisch-Imagn Images

The NFL Draft is just about two weeks away for the Minnesota Vikings, and with nine picks, the club will hope to extract some prospects from later rounds to make up for mostly miserable drafts over the last four seasons. And if the team strikes gold, one of the draftees might be Wisconsin outside linebacker Mason Reiger.

Minnesota may have found another developmental front-seven option.

The Vikings spent a Top 30 visit on Reiger, usually a decent indicator that he could end up with the franchise in the draft’s late rounds or from undrafted free agency soon after.

Advertisement

A Wisconsin Sleeper Has Entered the Vikings’ Draft Orbit

Get to know some possible late-rounders.

Mason Reiger speaks to reporters at the NFL Scouting Combine. Mason Reiger Vikings.
Feb 25, 2026; Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Wisconsin defensive lineman Mason Reiger (DL58) addresses media members during the NFL Scouting Combine at the Indiana Convention Center, discussing his college career and draft outlook as teams evaluate prospects during one of the most important weeks on the pre-draft calendar. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images.

Reiger to Meet with MIN

Every team is allotted Top 30 visits, and the Vikings usually use them on players from all rounds, even if the player won’t be drafted.

Late last month, NFL draft insider Ryan Fowler tweeted, ‘Source: Wisconsin EDGE Mason Reiger has a 30 visit scheduled with the Minnesota Vikings. 6’5″, 250 lbs pass-rusher was named the Defensive MVP of the Shrine game after recording three sacks & a FF. Also had a private workout with New Orleans.”

Advertisement

The meeting turned heads because Minnesota could use some help at EDGE, especially youthful options, as Jonathan Greenard and Andrew Van Ginkel headline the position (both age 28 or older), with Dallas Turner (not old) at OLB3.

The Bio

Reiger is undersized as an outside linebacker but right on point as an off-ball linebacker. The kicker? He plays more with an EDGE’s skill set. His speed is phenomenal for his position, his length outstanding. The spin move is also there. It’s just that he’s not the best tackler in the Big Ten, and that will need significant refinement in the pros.

He logged 10 sacks in the last two years at Wisconsin and Louisville.

Advertisement

NFL Draft Buzz on Reiger: “The pass rush ability is real. His first step and closing burst are uncommon, and the inside spin move is already a weapon. When he’s operating as a designated rusher on third down, working off the ball in a two-point stance, he can collapse the pocket in a hurry.”

“The 45 pressures he racked up at Wisconsin, plus the Shrine Bowl destruction, tell a consistent story about a guy who can get after quarterbacks. His grade as a pass rusher backed that up all year, and the arc of his development from a mid-60s graded player in 2021-22 to an elite-level rusher by 2025 suggests a player who is still ascending.”

Reiger may look older for his age, but he’s still 23. A bit old — not ancient rookie age.

India Reed wears a custom jacket supporting Mason Reiger at Fan Fest. Mason Reiger Vikings.
Dec 2, 2023; Charlotte, North Carolina, USA; India Reed wears a custom jacket in support of Louisville defensive lineman Mason Reiger during Fan Fest ahead of the ACC Football Championship Game, drawing attention from fans while celebrating her boyfriend’s big stage opportunity during championship weekend festivities. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Faughender-Imagn Images.

NBD added, “The fit is clear: a 3-4 outside linebacker or a wide-nine edge rusher in a defense that can use him situationally as a rookie and gradually expand his role as he develops. Reiger is not a three-down starter on Day 1, but he absolutely can be a productive rotational rusher who gives offensive tackles a different look.”

“The former walk-on story, the injury comeback, the Shrine Bowl dominance, the steady improvement year over year, all of it paints a picture of a player who will maximize every opportunity he gets.”

Advertisement

Minnesota’s Current OLBs

The scouting report suggests Reiger would latch onto the back end of the Vikings’ EDGE depth chart, hoping to work his way up over the duration of a rookie contract.

With the draft 15 days away, here’s Minnesota’s OLB corps:

  • Jonathan Greenard
  • Andrew Van Ginkel
  • Dallas Turner
  • Bo Richter
  • Tyler Batty
  • Chazz Chambliss

NFL.com’s Lance Zierlein compared Reiger to former NFLer Kyler Fackrell and noted, “He doesn’t look like a pro pre-snap, but he certainly plays like one after the snap. He lacks the size/anchor to consistently set the edge and can be controlled when tackles latch on, but he’s unusually talented to work off contact for quick wins at the point of attack.”

Where in the Draft?

Advertisement

This is the fun part. The Vikings won’t have to spend precious draft capital to obtain Reiger. Right now, he’s listed at No. 219 on the Consensus Big Board, and conveniently, Minnesota has three 7th-Round draft picks in that territory.

Mason Reiger participates in drills at the NFL Scouting Combine. Mason Reiger Vikings.
Feb 26, 2026; Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Wisconsin defensive lineman Mason Reiger (DL58) participates in on-field drills at Lucas Oil Stadium during the NFL Scouting Combine, showcasing his strength, movement skills, and technique as evaluators from across the league observe closely ahead of the upcoming draft. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images.

It’s not unreasonable to assume that Minnesota will leave the draft with an extra EDGE rusher, and Reiger perfectly blends draft placement and a style that defensive coordinator Brian Flores might enjoy.

Former general manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah made a flurry of strange trades last summer. The 7th-Rounders on tap are a result.

The Vikings haven’t drafted a player from the University of Wisconsin in 21 years.


avatar
Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Chicago Bears Hall Of Famer Steve McMichael Had CTE, Researchers Say

Published

on




Hall of Famer Steve McMichael, a key member of the dominating defense that helped the 1985 Chicago Bears win the Super Bowl, has been diagnosed with chronic traumatic encephalopathy, the Concussion & CTE Foundation said. McMichael died last year at 67 after a five-year fight with ALS. “Too many NFL players are developing ALS during life and diagnosed with CTE after death,” his wife, Misty McMichael, said in a statement released by the foundation. “I donated Steve’s brain to inspire new research into the link between them.” CTE is a degenerative brain disease that has been found in athletes in contact sports, combat veterans and others exposed to repetitive head trauma. It has been known to cause violent mood swings, impulsive behavior and depression. It can only be diagnosed after death.

According to a 2021 study by the Harvard Medical School and the Boston University CTE Center, NFL players are more than four times more likely to develop ALS than other men. Dr. Ann McKee, director of the Boston University CTE Center, said about 6% of individuals with CTE in the brain bank also have ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease.

“There is strong evidence linking repetitive brain trauma and ALS,” McKee said.

Advertisement

A two-time All-Pro and 2024 Pro Football Hall of Fame inductee, McMichael was known as “Mongo” and “Ming The Merciless” while playing in a franchise-record 191 consecutive games from 1981-93. He ranks second to Richard Dent on the Bears’ career sacks list with 92 1/2.

McMichael played his final NFL season with Green Bay in 1994, and then went on to a career in pro wrestling.

In 2021, McMichael revealed he had ALS, which affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, causing loss of muscle control. He followed the research seeking a link between ALS and CTE and pledged his brain to be studied, according to Chris Nowinski, co-founder and CEO of the Concussion & CTE Foundation.

“Steve McMichael was known for his strength, toughness, and larger-than-life presence, but his final act was to give a piece of himself back to the sports community so that we might have a chance to save ourselves,” Nowinski said. “I appreciate all the former athletes, including many of Steve’s ’85 Bears teammates, who are raising funds and volunteering to participate in CTE research so we can create a brighter future for athletes everywhere.”

Advertisement


Featured Video Of The Day


IPL 2026 | Delhi Capitals Wins By 6 Wickets Against Mumbai Indians: Redemption For Sameer Rizvi

Topics mentioned in this article

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Hawks vs. Cavaliers prediction, odds, line, time: 2026 NBA picks for Wednesday, April 8

Published

on

Teams that have a good shot at meeting in the first round of the playoffs clash when the Atlanta Hawks take on the Cleveland Cavaliers on Wednesday night. Atlanta is coming off a 108-105 loss to the New York Knicks on Monday, while Cleveland downed the Memphis Grizzlies 142-126 that same night. The Hawks (45-34), who hold down the fifth seed in the Eastern Conference, are 22-17 on the road this season. The Cavaliers (50-29), who are the fourth seed in the East, are 25-14 on their home court.

Tipoff from Rocket Arena in Cleveland is set for 7 p.m. ET. The Hawks lead the all-time series 133-115, and have won four of the last six meetings. The Cavaliers are a 1.5-point favorite in the latest Hawks vs. Cavaliers odds, while the over/under for total points scored is 235.5. Before making any Hawks vs. Cavaliers picks, check out the Hawks vs. Cavaliers predictions from the SportsLine Projection Model.

Visit our DraftKings promo code review to see their latest offers and get started.

The SportsLine Projection Model simulates every NBA game 10,000 times and has returned well over $10,000 in betting profit for $100 players on its top-rated NBA picks over the past eight-plus seasons. The model entered Week 25 on a sizzling 47-20 roll on top-rated NBA spread picks dating back to last season. Anyone following its NBA betting advice at sportsbooks and on betting apps could have seen huge returns.

Advertisement

Now, the model has simulated Hawks vs. Cavaliers 10,000 times and just revealed its coveted NBA picks and betting predictions. You can head to SportsLine now to see the model’s picks. Here are several NBA odds and NBA betting lines for Cavaliers vs. Hawks:

Hawks vs. Cavaliers spread:    

Cleveland -1.5 at DraftKings    

Hawks vs. Cavaliers over/under:    

Advertisement

235.5 points

Hawks vs. Cavaliers money line:

Cleveland -121, Atlanta +101

Hawks vs. Cavaliers picks:    

Advertisement

See picks at SportsLine

Hawks vs. Cavaliers streaming:

Fubo (Try for free) 

New to sports betting? Visit our FanDuel promo code review to see their latest offers and get started. 

Advertisement

Top Hawks vs. Cavaliers predictions

After 10,000 simulations of Hawks vs. Cavaliers, SportsLine’s model is going Under on the total (235.5). The Under has hit in six of the last 10 head-to-head matchups. The Under has also hit in three of the past four Atlanta games, and in 40 of 79 games this season. The Under has also hit in 24 of Cleveland’s last 39 home games.

The SportsLine model is projecting the Hawks to have just two players scoring 18 or more points, led by Jalen Johnson’s 19.8 points. Donovan Mitchell, who is questionable with an ankle injury, is projected to lead the Cavaliers with 25.8 points scored, but only two other Cleveland players are projected to score more than 15 points. The teams are projected to combine for 235 total points, making the Under the value play. See the spread pick at SportsLine.

How to make Cavaliers vs. Hawks picks

After simulating each possession 10,000 times, the model also says one side of the spread hits well over 60% of the time. You can head to SportsLine to see the model’s NBA picks

So who wins Cavaliers vs. Hawks, and which side of the spread hits well over 60% of the time? Visit SportsLine now to see which side of the Hawks vs. Cavaliers spread to back, all from the model that has returned well over $10,000 on top-rated NBA picks, and find out.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

NBA roundup: Wolves down Pacers, subsequently clinch playoff berth

Published

on

NBA: Minnesota Timberwolves at Indiana PacersApr 7, 2026; Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Minnesota Timberwolves guard Ayo Dosunmu (13) shoots the ball while Indiana Pacers center Jay Huff (32) defends in the first half at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-Imagn Images

Ayo Dosunmu scored 24 points as the Minnesota Timberwolves snapped a three-game losing streak with a 124-104 win over the Indiana Pacers on Tuesday in Indianapolis.

Julius Randle and Bones Hyland added 19 apiece and Naz Reid contributed 17 for Minnesota (47-32), which sits in sixth place in the Western Conference. The Timberwolves finished the night clinching a playoff spot and avoiding the play-in after the Phoenix Suns fell to the Houston Rockets 119-105 later Tuesday.

Rookie Ethan Thompson posted 17 points for the Pacers (18-61), who took their third straight defeat. Obi Toppin and Jalen Slawson both had 14 points.

Indiana’s season-long injury crisis continued when forward Kobe Brown, who was in the starting five, was unable to play after halftime with lower back soreness.

Thunder 123, Lakers 87

Advertisement

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 25 points in 28 minutes as Oklahoma City demolished the Lakers for the second time in five days, prevailing in Los Angeles.

The Thunder, by earning their sixth consecutive win and their 18th in 19 games, moved within one win or one San Antonio Spurs loss of clinching the top spot in the Western Conference for the third consecutive season. Chet Holmgren had 15 points and 10 rebounds, while Isaiah Joe and Jared McCain added 18 and 15 points off the bench, respectively.

The Lakers fell a game behind the Denver Nuggets for the No. 3 spot in the West with their third consecutive loss. They are now tied with Houston after the Rockets beat the Suns. Rui Hachimura led Los Angeles with 15 points on 7-of-10 shooting. No other Los Angeles player scored more than 11.

Rockets 119, Suns 105

Advertisement

Kevin Durant had 24 points and five 3-pointers in his return to Phoenix and Houston overcame a 21-point deficit for its largest comeback of the season, producing a victory over the host Suns.

Amen Thompson logged 22 points, 11 rebounds and eight assists and Jabari Smith Jr. had 20 points and five 3-pointers for the Rockets, who have won seven in a row and nine of 11. The Rockets are tied with the Los Angeles Lakers for fourth place in the West and are one game behind the Denver Nuggets with three to play.

Devin Booker had 31 points and eight assists and Mark Williams contributed 19 points and eight rebounds for the Suns, who had a 24-0 run in the first quarter to build a 26-5 lead before fading.

Pelicans 156, Jazz 137

Advertisement

Jeremiah Fears scored a career-high and franchise-rookie-record 40 points and as New Orleans set a club record for points in a blowout of visiting Utah.

Jordan Poole added 34 points, Jordan Hawkins put up a season-high 25 and rookie Micah Peavy scored a career-high 20 as the Pelicans ended an eight-game losing streak.

Kennedy Chandler scored a career-high 31 points and rookie Bez Mbeng added a career-best 26 for the Jazz, who lost their 10th consecutive game.

Celtics 113, Hornets 102

Advertisement

Jaylen Brown scored 35 points and grabbed nine rebounds to propel Boston past visiting Charlotte.

The Celtics received 23 points from Jayson Tatum and 12 apiece from Neemias Queta, Derrick White and Payton Pritchard. Boston has won four straight and 11 of its past 13 games.

LaMelo Ball tossed in a game-high 36 points for the Hornets, but he failed to score in the fourth quarter. Charlotte was held to 15 points in the final period as its four-game winning streak ended.

Advertisement

Bulls 129, Wizards 98

Rob Dillingham’s career-high 26 points off the bench highlighted a balanced scoring effort as Chicago rolled past host Washington.

Chicago left little doubt on the way to snapping a seven-game losing streak, pouncing on Washington with a 9-0 run midway the first quarter. Tre Jones put up 20 points, his third effort of 19-plus points in his past five games, and he wound up one assist shy of his first double-double since January. Patrick Williams added 20 points, seven rebounds and six assists.

Bilal Coulibaly led the Wizards with 19 points. First-year forward Julian Reese posted his fourth double-double in his 10 NBA games, going for 17 points and 11 rebounds.

Advertisement

Nets 96, Bucks 90

E.J. Liddell scored 21 points to lead Brooklyn to a victory over visiting Milwaukee.

It was the second win in a row for Brooklyn and third in its last five contests. Ben Saraf added 19 points while Malachi Smith and Drake Powell each scored 11.

AJ Green led the Bucks with 20 points on six 3-pointers (6-for-12). Taurean Prince scored 16 points with 11 rebounds while Cormac Ryan added 14. Jericho Sims tallied 12 points, eight boards and six assists, and Ousmane Dieng had 10 points and seven rebounds.

Advertisement

Clippers 116, Mavericks 103

Kawhi Leonard scored 34 points and Darius Garland added 22 as Los Angeles improved its play-in tournament seeding possibilities with a victory over Dallas in Inglewood, Calif.

John Collins scored 12 points and Derrick Jones Jr. added 11 points with 10 rebounds as the eighth-place Clippers moved a full game ahead of the ninth-place Portland Trail Blazers. The Clippers and Blazers will meet Friday at Portland.

Cooper Flagg scored 25 points and Marvin Bagley III added 21 as the Mavericks fell to 2-9 since March 16. Flagg, 19, coming off consecutive games of 51 and 45 points.

Advertisement

Raptors 121, Heat 95

Scottie Barnes scored 25 points and Brandon Ingram added 23, leading Toronto to a victory over visiting Miami.

Jakob Poeltl had 17 points while RJ Barrett chipped in 16 for the Raptors, who pulled within a game of the fifth-place Atlanta Hawks in the Eastern Conference. Toronto had dropped three of its previous four games.

The Heat got 24 points from Andrew Wiggins and 14 points apiece from Tyler Herro and Norman Powell. Miami shot just 27.3% (12 of 44) on 3-point attempts while dropping its ninth game in 12 tries.

Advertisement

Warriors 110, Kings 105

Stephen Curry capped his 17-point performance with a game-tying 3-pointer, then turned his own miss into an offensive rebound and assist on Brandin Podziemski’s go-ahead trey as Golden State outlasted Sacramento in San Francisco.

De’Anthony Melton had a game-high 21 points and Podziemski finished with 20 for the Warriors, who ended a four-game losing streak while resting Kristaps Porzingis on the first night of a four-games-in-six-days sequence.

Killian Hayes led a balanced attack with 18 points off the bench for the Kings, who dropped their second in a row.

Advertisement

–Field Level Media

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

WSL academies: Can they improve to help homegrown talent?

Published

on

According to sources at WSL clubs, Bompastor’s comments are widely agreed with.

At the leading English clubs, players are developed by Professional Game Academies (PGA), funded and operated by the Football Association.

The FA first awarded 20 initial PGA licences to clubs in England’s two top tiers in 2023 as part of a major revamp.

From the 2028-29 season, WSL Football – the company that operates the Women’s Super League – will take over full responsibility.

Advertisement

As well as the PGAs, lower-tier clubs often create partnerships with schools and colleges to form a local talent pool. They can also set up their own youth teams and academies but would not be part of a professional league.

The FA has linked up with Women’s National League clubs – the third tier – to provide funds and resources for developing young talent, as well as building connections with WSL sides who want to loan players out to clubs at that level.

Some academies have also been involved in the Women’s National League Cup and Plate competitions, and they can enter local Senior County Cup tournaments.

The maximum number of matches teams can play in a PGA league – competitions set up for age groups up to Under-21 level – has increased from 19 to 27 in the past five seasons.

Advertisement

In summary, England’s youngsters are getting more game time and playing in a wider range of competitions – but it is not at the elite level.

There are gaps in the data but both the FA and WSL Football have confirmed the number of minutes played in the top tier by English academy graduates has dropped dramatically in recent seasons because of the increased competition for places.

Manchester City manager Andree Jeglertz told BBC Sport it is “the biggest step a young player will take” when they break into a WSL squad.

“I can only look at our own academy and it is a big step to go from there to being a senior player, especially for clubs like Chelsea and Manchester City – teams who want to be competing in Europe,” he added.

Advertisement

“What is the best solution to that? I don’t know. There definitely has to be some way to bridge that gap, whether that’s how they are training or [the] professional [environment].”

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Deontay Wilder offered immediate title shot after Chisora win: “We’re ready”

Published

on

Deontay Wilder re-established himself in the heavyweight division by outpointing Derek Chisora on Saturday night. Just days later, a route to becoming two-time world champion has presented itself.

In a hectic affair, two of the three judges ruled that ‘The Bronze Bomber’ had done enough to spoil Chisora’s farewell fight and pull off the upset, securing a first win on the world stage since losing his WBC heavyweight title to Tyson Fury in 2020.

Prior to the fight, Chisora was ranked as the IBF’s number 2 heavyweight contender and Wilder is expected to benefit from that rating, opening the door to a clash against the victor of Frank Sanchez and Richard Torrez Jr – who fight in a final eliminator next month.

Advertisement

However, it is with the WBA where Wilder could become a two-time titleholder, as he has been offered a fight by Al Siesta, promoter of WBA Regular heavyweight champion, Murat Gassiev, on X.

“Congratulations to our brother in IBA ‘The Bronze Bomber’ for his victory over the legend Chisora.

“Deontay you are a great champion and it would be our honour for you to compete for Murat Gassiev’s WBA title next. We are ready for anyone.”

Whilst Gassiev – who has also called out Moses Itauma – currently holds the WBA ‘Regular’ title and Oleksandr Usyk remains the recognised ‘Super’ champion, the situation within the sanctioning body could soon shift.

Unified champion Usyk is set to face former kickboxing champion Rico Verhoeven next month, with the WBC already confirming its belt will be on the line for that bout. However, as of writing, the WBA and IBF have yet to clarify their positions. Should either body refuse to sanction the fight, Usyk could be forced to vacate or be stripped of one or both titles.

Advertisement

That uncertainty is what makes the WBA route particularly relevant for Wilder. If Usyk relinquishes the belt – whether immediately or as part of his planned run of final fights – the ‘Regular’ title picture involving Gassiev could quickly be elevated, creating a clearer path to full championship status.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Liv Morgan and more WWE stars dress up in wild costumes for 18+ party hosted by Alexa Bliss and her husband

Published

on

Several WWE Superstars, including Liv Morgan, recently attended a wild costume party hosted by Alexa Bliss and her husband, Ryan Caberara. Little Miss Bliss’ friend and popular hair & makeup artist Ian Maxion posted about the party.

Both Alexa Bliss and Liv Morgan will be in action at WrestleMania 42. Little Miss Bliss is set to team up with Charlotte Flair to lock horns with The Irresistible Forces, The Bella Twins, and Bayley & Lyra Valkyria in a Fatal Four-Way Tag Team Match for the Women’s Tag Team Championship. Meanwhile, Morgan will face Stephanie Vaquer for the WWE Women’s World Championship.

Ahead of this year’s Show of Shows, Bliss and her husband, Ryan Cabrera, threw a wild 18+ costume party. Hair & makeup artist Ian Maxion recently took to Instagram to post a video of the party in which Liv Morgan, Raquel Rodriguez, Alexa Bliss, and CJ Perry were spotted dressed up as different characters. In the post’s caption, Maxion seemingly revealed the party’s name was “The Greatest Sh*t Show.”

Advertisement

“@alexa_bliss_wwe_ and @ryancabrera present ‘The Greatest Sh*t Show.’ And we got all dressed up for the circus! 🤡🎪🤹‍♂️,” he wrote.

Check out the Instagram post by clicking here.

Liv Morgan and CJ Perry reacted to his post by leaving comments on it. The Miracle Kid called the party “iconic,” and Perry wrote that she had a lot of fun.

“So iconic,” Morgan wrote.

Check out screenshots of their comments below:

Screenshots of Liv Morgan and CJ Perry's comments [Image via Instagram/@ianmaxion]Screenshots of Liv Morgan and CJ Perry's comments [Image via Instagram/@ianmaxion]
Screenshots of Liv Morgan and CJ Perry’s comments [Image via Instagram/@ianmaxion]

Liv Morgan could miss WrestleMania 42 after an injury on WWE RAW

On the latest edition of Monday Night RAW, Liv Morgan was shown talking to Roxanne Perez in a backstage segment before Stephanie Vaquer came out of nowhere to push Morgan into Perez. La Primera then threw The Miracle Kid onto a television. This spot has since been doing the rounds on social media, as Morgan and Perez’s heads collided, and both stars were put in a concussion protocol. The former WWE Women’s World Champion even got a nasty bump on her forehead.

Bryan Alvarez revealed on Wrestling Observer Live that Liv Morgan vs. Stephanie Vaquer could have been canceled if WrestleMania 42 was this weekend, but the match could take place as scheduled because there is still time in ‘Mania. However, this wasn’t a 100% guarantee at the moment, as it is a head injury.

Advertisement

“They were both put in concussion protocol. It’s wait and see. I was pretty much told, if WrestleMania was this weekend, that match probably ain’t happening. Two weeks from now, I guess we’ll see if it happens,” Alvarez said.

It remains to be seen if Liv Morgan and Stephanie Vaquer will lock horns for the WWE Women’s World Championship at WrestleMania 42 as scheduled.