Connect with us

Sports

Updated All-Time AP Football Polls by Program and Year

Published

on


  By SuperWest Sports Staff


The Associated Press (AP) Football Poll has run continuously since 1936. Up to 1960, the poll ranked only 20 teams. From 1961 to 1967, it was reduced to just the Top 10.

The Poll returned to ranking the Top 20 teams in 1968, retaining that format through 1988. In 1989, it was expanded to the Top 25 and has not altered its count since.

Initially, AP did not conduct a preseason poll, adding it in 1950.

Advertisement

Through 1968, except for the 1965 poll, AP crowned its national football champion after the regular season, before the bowl games were played.

That changed in 1964, when the regular-season AP champ, Alabama, lost the Orange Bowl to Texas.

Consequently, the news organization made plans to hold its poll after the bowl season, beginning in 1967, to award its national title.

Below you will find tables for the top football programs in the West, including:

Advertisement
  • The years in which they have appeared in the AP Poll
  • The number of appearances for each season
  • The percentage of the season in which they were ranked
  • Their high and low rankings for each year
  • Their preseason and final rankings, if any

Following those lists is a table with the total number of polls each program has appeared in its history.

USC leads the way in that category, having missed just five of the 90 all-time polls (as of the 2025 Final Poll).

Air Force
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2023 3 19% NR 17 22 NR
2019 3 18% NR 22 25 22
2010 2 13% NR 23 25 NR
2002 3 17% NR 18 22 NR
1999 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
1998 8 50% NR 13 25 13
1997 6 33% NR 18 24 NR
1995 1 6% NR 21 21 NR
1991 1 6% NR 25 25 25
1989 4 24% NR 17 24 NR
1985 13 76% NR 4 19 8
1983 4 25% NR 13 18 13
1972 4 27% NR 16 19 NR
1971 2 13% NR 18 20 NR
1970 13 87% NR 7 20 16
1969 4 29% NR 19 20 NR
1959 5 38% 15 15 18 NR
1958 7 58% NR 6 14 6

*Air Force has been ranked in 18 out of 90 polls.


Arizona football Pac-12Arizona
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 2 12% NR 21 22 NR
2024 3 18% 21 20 21 NR
2023 6 38% NR 11 23 11
2017 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2015 4 25% 22 16 22 NR
2014 11 65% NR 8 21 19
2012 3 19% NR 22 24 NR
2010 11 69% NR 9 24 NR
2009 4 25% NR 18 23 NR
2000 3 18% NR 21 24 NR
1999 4 24% 4 4 19 NR
1998 16 100% 24 4 24 4
1995 5 29% 19 17 25 NR
1994 17 100% 7 6 20 20
1993 17 100% 14 7 19 10
1992 8 47% NR 9 23 NR
1990 7 44% NR 16 25 NR
1989 9 53% 18 15 25 25
1986 13 87% NR 10 17 11
1983 8 50% 14 3 19 NR
1975 15 100% 16 11 18 18
1974 9 60% 17 9 19 NR
1973 2 13% NR 19 19 NR
1968 1 7% NR 19 19 NR

*Arizona has been ranked in 24 out of 90 polls.


Arizona State
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 5 29% 11 11 25 NR
2024 5 29% NR 7 21 7
2021 5 31% 25 18 25 NR
2019 5 29% NR 17 24 NR
2018 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2015 1 6% 15 15 15 NR
2014 16 94% 19 7 20 12
2013 10 59% NR 11 25 20
2011 7 44% NR 18 25 NR
2008 3 18% 15 15 15 NR
2007 12 75% NR 6 23 16
2006 4 25% 24 22 25 NR
2005 6 38% 20 14 20 NR
2004 13 81% NR 15 23 19
2003 4 24% 22 16 22 NR
2002 3 17% NR 16 25 NR
1999 4 24% 25 22 25 NR
1998 2 13% 8 8 14 NR
1997 13 72% NR 12 25 14
1996 18 100% 20 2 20 4
1993 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
1991 2 13% NR 24 25 NR
1990 3 19% NR 21 25 NR
1987 7 44% 14 12 20 20
1986 13 87% NR 4 18 4
1984 2 13% 13 12 13 NR
1983 4 25% NR 13 20 NR
1982 16 100% 19 3 19 6
1981 13 87% 20 9 20 16
1980 1 6% NR 20 20 NR
1979 1 7% 18 18 18 NR
1978 2 13% NR 12 14 NR
1977 8 57% 17 12 20 18
1976 2 14% 3 3 18 NR
1975 13 87% NR 2 18 2
1974 10 67% 15 7 18 NR
1973 15 100% 14 8 14 9
1972 12 80% 12 10 19 13
1971 15 100% 14 8 16 8
1970 14 93% 19 6 20 6
1969 1 7% NR 18 18 NR
1968 5 36% 17 14 20 NR
1960 1 8% NR 18 18 NR
1957 3 25% NR 11 17 12

*Arizona State has been ranked in 44 out of 90 polls.


Boise State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 1 6% 25 25 25 NR
2024 13 76% NR 8 25 8
2020 2 12% NR 21 25 NR
2019 16 94% NR 14 24 23
2018 8 50% 22 17 23 23
2017 3 19% NR 22 25 22
2016 9 56% NR 13 24 NR
2015 4 25% 23 20 25 NR
2014 4 24% NR 16 25 16
2013 1 6% 19 19 19 NR
2012 10 63% 24 18 25 18
2011 16 100% 5 4 10 8
2010 16 100% 3 2 10 9
2009 16 100% 14 4 14 4
2008 13 76% NR 9 19 11
2007 8 50% 24 17 24 NR
2006 13 81% NR 5 25 5
2005 1 6% 18 18 18 NR
2004 14 88% NR 10 23 12
2003 6 35% NR 16 24 16
2002 5 28% NR 15 23 15

*Boise State has been ranked in 21 out of 90 polls.


BYU
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 13 76% NR 8 25 11
2024 13 76% NR 7 22 13
2022 6 38% 25 12 25 NR
2021 13 81% NR 10 25 19
2020 16 94% NR 8 22 11
2018 2 13% NR 20 25 NR
2015 2 13% NR 19 22 NR
2014 4 24% NR 18 25 NR
2012 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
2009 15 94% 20 7 25 12
2008 17 100% 16 8 25 25
2007 4 25% NR 14 23 14
2006 6 38% NR 16 25 16
2001 14 82% NR 8 25 25
1999 9 53% NR 15 25 NR
1997 6 33% 19 19 24 NR
1996 16 89% NR 5 24 5
1994 10 59% NR 18 25 18
1993 7 41% 19 19 21 NR
1992 5 29% 24 24 25 NR
1991 4 25% 19 19 25 23
1990 16 100% 16 4 22 22
1989 13 76% 19 18 25 22
1988 1 6% NR 20 20 NR
1986 3 20% 18 11 18 NR
1985 17 100% 10 7 18 16
1984 15 94% NR 1 13 1
1983 11 69% NR 7 20 7
1981 12 80% 16 8 18 13
1980 9 56% NR 12 19 12
1979 11 73% NR 9 20 13
1977 12 86% NR 13 20 20
1974 2 13% NR 17 20 NR

*BYU has been ranked in 33 out of 90 polls.


California
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2019 2 12% NR 15 23 NR
2018 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
2015 4 25% NR 20 24 NR
2009 8 50% 12 6 24 NR
2008 3 18% NR 21 25 NR
2007 10 63% 12 2 24 NR
2006 16 100% 9 8 22 14
2005 11 69% 19 10 25 25
2004 16 100% 12 4 12 9
2002 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
1996 2 11% NR 19 21 NR
1993 6 35% NR 16 25 25
1992 4 24% 20 17 24 NR
1991 13 81% NR 6 24 8
1977 5 36% NR 14 20 NR
1976 1 7% 15 15 15 NR
1975 6 40% NR 11 18 14
1974 4 27% NR 18 20 NR
1968 7 50% NR 8 18 NR
1958 3 25% NR 16 19 16
1954 3 25% 12 12 18 NR
1953 2 18% 14 14 16 NR
1952 6 55% 8 3 11 NR
1951 11 100% 5 1 19 12
1950 10 100% 14 4 14 5
1949 9 100% NA 2 10 3
1948 9 100% NA 4 9 4
1947 10 100% NA 4 15 15
1944 1 11% NA 12 12 NR
1943 1 11% NA 20 20 NR
1938 8 100% NA 3 14 14
1937 7 100% NA 1 2 2

*Cal has been ranked in 32 out of 90 polls.


Colorado
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2024 8 47% NR 16 25 25
2023 3 19% NR 18 22 NR
2020 1 6% NR 21 21 NR
2018 2 13% NR 19 21 NR
2016 9 56% NR 9 23 17
2005 3 19% NR 22 25 NR
2003 2 12% NR 17 24 NR
2002 14 78% 7 7 23 20
2001 11 65% NR 3 25 9
2000 2 12% 24 23 24 NR
1999 2 12% 15 14 15 NR
1998 8 50% NR 14 24 NR
1997 8 44% 8 8 24 NR
1996 18 100% 5 5 12 8
1995 17 100% 13 4 14 5
1994 17 100% 8 2 8 3
1993 17 100% 11 7 23 16
1992 17 100% 12 7 16 13
1991 16 100% 13 12 25 20
1990 16 100% 5 1 20 1
1989 17 100% 14 1 14 4
1988 1 6% NR 19 19 NR
1978 4 27% NR 13 19 NR
1977 8 57% 12 3 15 NR
1976 7 50% NR 12 19 16
1975 11 73% NR 9 19 16
1973 7 47% 11 10 19 NR
1972 15 100% 2 2 16 16
1971 14 93% NR 3 13 3
1970 6 40% NR 8 19 NR
1969 2 14% NR 16 18 16
1967 8 67% 10 3 10 NR
1961 8 67% NR 6 10 7
1960 1 8% NR 18 18 NR
1958 3 25% NR 9 19 NR
1957 1 8% NR 18 18 NR
1956 4 33% NR 18 20 20
1955 2 17% NR 14 20 NR
1954 2 17% NR 11 17 NR
1937 4 57% NA 16 17 17

*Colorado has been ranked in 40 out of 90 polls.

Colorado State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2014 3 18% NR 21 23 NR
2003 1 6% 23 23 23 NR
2002 11 61% NR 16 25 NR
2001 2 12% 24 24 24 NR
2000 3 18% NR 14 23 14
1999 2 12% NR 23 24 NR
1998 1 6% 15 15 15 NR
1997 8 44% NR 17 25 17
1994 12 71% NR 10 24 16

*Colorado State has been ranked in 9 out of 90 polls.


Fresno State
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2023 2 13% NR 24 25 NR
2022 1 6% NR 24 24 24
2021 3 19% NR 18 25 NR
2018 5 31% NR 16 25 18
2017 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
2013 12 71% NR 15 25 NR
2008 5 29% NR 21 25 NR
2005 10 63% 24 16 24 NR
2004 4 25% NR 17 22 22
2001 11 65% NR 8 23 NR
1993 2 12% NR 25 25 NR
1992 1 6% NR 24 24 24
1991 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1990 2 13% NR 24 24 NR
1989 3 18% NR 23 25 NR
1986 1 7% NR 19 19 NR
1942 1 13% NR 18 18 NR

*Fresno State has been ranked in 17 out of 90 polls.

Hawai’i
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2010 2 13% NR 24 25 NR
2007 16 100% 23 10 24 19
2006 2 13% NR 24 25 NR
1992 2 12% NR 20 24 20
1989 5 29% NR 23 25 NR
1981 1 7% NR 19 19 NR

*Hawai’i has been ranked in 6 out of 90 polls.

Nevada
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2010 10 63% NR 11 25 11
1948 6 67% N/A 10 19 NR

*Nevada has been ranked in 2 out of 90 polls.

New Mexico

No appearances.


Oregon Ducks Logo Pac-12Oregon
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 17 100% 7 2 8 4
2024 17 100% 3 1 9 3
2023 16 100% 15 5 15 6
2022 15 94% 11 6 25 15
2021 16 100% 11 3 22 22
2020 12 71% 9 9 25 NR
2019 17 100% 11 5 16 5
2018 9 56% 24 12 24 NR
2017 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
2016 3 19% 24 22 24 NR
2015 9 56% 7 7 23 19
2014 17 100% 3 2 12 2
2013 17 100% 3 2 12 9
2012 16 100% 5 1 6 2
2011 16 100% 3 3 13 4
2010 16 100% 11 1 11 3
2009 13 81% 16 7 16 11
2008 11 65% 21 10 24 10
2007 13 81% NR 2 23 23
2006 11 69% 21 11 25 NR
2005 12 75% NR 6 25 12
2004 2 13% 23 23 24 NR
2003 3 18% NR 10 22 NR
2002 13 72% 15 6 23 NR
2001 17 100% 7 2 11 2
2000 12 71% NR 5 20 7
1999 2 12% NR 19 25 19
1998 14 88% NR 11 24 NR
1996 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1995 15 88% NR 10 24 18
1994 7 41% NR 11 21 11
1990 5 31% NR 19 25 NR
1989 2 12% NR 22 23 NR
1988 3 18% NR 18 20 NR
1987 1 6% NR 16 16 NR
1970 2 13% NR 16 19 NR
1964 2 18% NR 7 10 NR
1960 1 8% NR 19 19 NR
1959 5 38% NR 11 16 NR
1958 2 17% NR 14 15 NR
1957 5 42% NR 13 18 NR
1956 1 8% NR 18 18 NR
1954 2 17% 18 16 18 NR
1948 6 67% NA 9 16 9
1946 1 11% NA 19 19 NR
1941 1 13% NA 16 16 NR
1939 1 11% NA 11 11 NR

*Oregon has been ranked in 47 out of 90 polls.


Oregon State
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2023 15 94% 18 10 21 NR
2022 6 38% NR 16 25 17
2013 1 6% 25 25 25 NR
2012 12 75% NR 7 20 20
2010 4 25% 24 24 25 NR
2009 4 25% NR 13 20 NR
2008 6 35% NR 17 25 18
2007 1 6% NR 25 25 25
2006 2 13% NR 21 24 21
2003 2 12% NR 22 24 NR
2002 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2001 5 29% 11 10 22 NR
2000 11 65% NR 4 23 4
1968 10 71% 6 6 20 15
1967 3 25% NR 7 8 7
1964 3 27% NR 8 8 8
1960 4 33% NR 10 18 NR
1958 1 8% 12 12 12 NR
1957 6 50% 13 7 19 NR
1956 6 50% NR 10 17 10
1955 1 8% NR 19 19 NR
1951 2 18% NR 15 18 NR
1941 5 63% NA 12 18 12
1940 2 25% NA 18 19 NR
1939 3 33% NA 11 19 NR

*Oregon State has been ranked in 25 out of 90 polls.


San Diego State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2021 8 50% NR 19 25 25
2019 2 12% NR 24 25 NR
2017 4 25% NR 19 22 NR
2016 4 25% NR 19 25 25
1995 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1992 2 12% NR 21 23 NR
1977 3 21% NR 16 16 16
1975 2 13% NR 13 18 NR
1974 1 7% NR 20 20 NR
1970 5 33% NR 14 17 NR

*San Diego State has been ranked in 10 out of 90 polls.

San Jose State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2020 3 18% NR 19 25 24
2012 2 13% NR 21 24 21
1975 1 7% NR 20 20 NR
1939 2 22% N/A 18 19 NR

*San Jose State has been ranked in 4 out of 90 polls.


Stanford
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2019 2 12% 25 23 25 NR
2018 7 44% 13 7 24 NR
2017 12 75% 14 14 23 20
2016 9 56% 8 7 17 12
2015 14 88% 21 3 21 3
2014 8 47% 11 11 25 NR
2013 17 100% 4 4 13 11
2012 16 100% 21 7 25 7
2011 16 100% 7 3 8 7
2010 15 94% NR 4 25 4
2009 4 25% NR 14 25 NR
2001 11 65% NR 10 23 16
1999 2 12% NR 22 22 NR
1997 9 50% 18 16 25 NR
1995 4 24% NR 16 23 NR
1994 2 12% NR 24 25 NR
1993 5 29% 15 15 23 NR
1992 17 100% 17 8 21 9
1991 5 31% NR 17 22 22
1986 5 33% NR 16 20 NR
1981 2 13% 18 18 19 NR
1980 6 38% 15 11 20 NR
1979 1 7% 13 13 13 NR
1978 4 27% NR 17 20 17
1977 1 7% NR 15 15 15
1975 2 13% 20 18 20 NR
1974 2 13% NR 19 20 NR
1972 7 47% 20 13 20 NR
1971 15 100% 19 10 19 10
1970 15 100% 10 3 13 8
1969 13 93% 16 13 19 19
1968 2 14% NR 14 18 NR
1957 2 17% NR 16 17 NR
1956 4 33% 14 10 20 NR
1955 4 33% NR 16 20 16
1954 1 8% NR 17 17 NR
1953 7 64% NR 11 20 19
1952 2 18% 13 13 13 NR
1951 9 82% NR 3 19 7
1950 4 40% 7 6 8 NR
1949 3 33% NA 12 17 NR
1946 1 11% NA 17 17 NR
1942 2 25% NA 12 12 12
1941 5 63% NA 6 19 NR
1940 8 100% NA 2 10 2
1937 1 14% NA 13 13 NR

*Stanford has been ranked in 46 out of 90 polls.

UNLV
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2024 6 35% NR 19 25 23

*UNLV has been ranked in 1 out of 90 polls.


UCLA
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2023 6 38% NR 18 25 NR
2022 11 69% NR 9 21 21
2021 4 25% NR 13 24 NR
2017 1 6% NR 16 25 NR
2016 1 6% 16 16 16 NR
2015 11 69% 13 7 24 NR
2014 16 94% 7 7 25 10
2013 17 100% 21 9 22 16
2012 9 56% NR 15 25 NR
2008 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2007 3 19% 14 11 14 NR
2005 13 81% NR 7 25 16
2002 3 17% NR 20 25 NR
2001 12 71% 17 4 20 NR
2000 7 41% NR 6 23 NR
1999 5 29% 16 14 21 NR
1998 16 100% 7 2 8 8
1997 14 78% NR 5 24 5
1995 7 41% 16 12 24 NR
1994 5 29% 14 13 18 NR
1993 11 65% NR 10 25 18
1992 7 41% 18 11 19 NR
1991 10 63% 24 19 25 19
1990 2 13% 19 19 19 NR
1989 6 35% 9 6 25 NR
1988 17 100% 5 1 9 6
1987 16 100% 3 3 13 9
1986 14 93% 4 4 19 14
1985 15 88% 20 7 20 7
1984 10 63% 5 4 19 9
1983 2 13% 20 17 20 17
1982 16 100% 20 5 20 5
1981 10 67% 13 6 19 NR
1980 13 81% NR 2 18 13
1979 2 13% NR 17 20 NR
1978 15 100% 12 8 18 14
1977 5 36% 11 11 20 NR
1976 14 100% 17 2 17 15
1975 13 87% 14 5 19 5
1974 4 27% 12 12 18 NR
1973 15 100% 10 8 18 12
1972 14 93% NR 6 15 15
1971 1 7% 15 15 15 NR
1970 10 67% 18 13 19 NR
1969 14 100% 17 6 17 13
1968 4 29% 16 8 16 NR
1967 11 92% 8 1 8 NR
1966 13 100% 4 2 8 5
1965 6 46% NR 4 8 4
1961 1 8% NR 9 9 NR
1960 8 67% NR 8 19 NR
1959 2 15% NR 17 20 NR
1957 2 17% NR 15 19 NR
1956 2 17% 17 17 19 NR
1955 12 100% 1 1 9 4
1954 12 100% 8 1 8 2
1953 11 100% 4 4 12 5
1952 11 100% 18 3 18 6
1951 3 27% NR 15 18 17
1950 4 40% NR 13 19 NR
1949 3 33% NA 13 20 NR
1947 6 60% NA 16 19 NR
1946 9 100% NA 4 5 4
1945 1 11% NA 12 12 NR
1942 7 88% NA 10 18 13
1939 7 78% NA 7 19 7

*UCLA has been ranked in 66 out of 90 polls.


usc logoUSC
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 11 65% NR 16 25 20
2024 6 35% 23 11 23 NR
2023 10 63% 6 5 24 NR
2022 16 100% 14 4 14 12
2021 2 13% 15 14 15 NR
2020 13 76% 17 13 25 21
2019 5 29% NR 21 25 NR
2018 3 19% 15 15 22 NR
2017 16 100% 4 4 21 12
2016 6 38% 20 3 20 3
2015 8 50% 8 6 24 NR
2014 11 65% 15 9 24 20
2013 5 29% 24 19 25 19
2012 12 75% 1 1 21 NR
2011 10 63% 25 5 25 6
2010 7 44% 14 14 24 NR
2009 15 94% 4 3 24 22
2008 17 100% 3 1 9 3
2007 16 100% 1 1 13 3
2006 16 100% 6 2 9 4
2005 16 100% 1 1 2 2
2004 16 100% 1 1 1 1
2003 17 100% 8 1 10 1
2002 18 100% 20 4 20 4
2000 7 41% 15 8 18 NR
1999 6 35% 19 16 22 NR
1998 5 31% NR 18 22 NR
1997 4 22% 22 22 23 NR
1996 7 39% 7 7 19 NR
1995 17 100% 7 5 18 12
1994 14 82% 17 13 25 13
1993 2 12% 18 18 22 NR
1992 12 71% NR 11 23 NR
1991 3 19% 16 16 22 NR
1990 16 100% 9 5 23 20
1989 17 100% 5 5 13 8
1988 17 100% 6 2 8 7
1987 5 31% 19 16 19 18
1986 9 60% NR 9 18 NR
1985 5 29% 6 3 18 NR
1984 11 69% NR 7 20 10
1983 4 25% 8 8 14 NR
1982 16 100% 10 10 19 15
1981 15 100% 5 1 14 14
1980 16 100% 4 2 17 11
1979 15 100% 1 1 4 2
1978 15 100% 9 2 9 2
1977 12 86% 4 1 20 13
1976 13 93% 8 2 19 2
1975 12 80% 5 3 17 17
1974 15 100% 5 2 18 2
1973 15 100% 1 1 9 8
1972 15 100% 8 1 8 1
1971 9 60% 5 5 20 20
1970 12 80% 3 3 18 15
1969 14 100% 5 3 7 3
1968 14 100% 2 1 4 4
1967 12 100% 7 1 7 1
1966 11 85% 9 5 10 NR
1965 11 85% 7 4 10 10
1964 2 18% NR 2 10 10
1963 4 31% 1 1 8 NR
1962 11 92% NR 1 9 1
1960 1 8% 6 6 6 NR
1959 12 92% NR 4 14 14
1957 1 8% 19 19 19 NR
1956 11 92% 15 6 20 18
1955 9 75% 13 9 16 13
1954 11 92% 17 7 17 17
1953 10 91% 8 7 20 NR
1952 11 100% 16 2 16 5
1951 8 73% NR 6 20 NR
1950 1 10% 12 12 12 NR
1949 6 67% NA 8 19 NR
1947 10 100% NA 3 20 8
1946 4 44% NA 10 16 NR
1945 5 56% NA 6 20 11
1944 7 78% NA 7 15 7
1943 6 67% NA 4 10 NR
1942 2 25% NA 14 16 NR
1940 2 25% NA 17 17 NR
1939 9 100% NA 1 8 3
1938 7 88% NA 7 19 7
1937 1 14% NA 11 11 NR
1936 4 57% NA 6 15 NR

*USC has been ranked in 85 out of 90 polls.


Utah
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 12 71% NR 13 25 14
2024 7 41% 12 10 18 NR
2023 12 75% 14 10 18 NR
2022 16 100% 7 7 20 10
2021 7 44% 24 10 24 12
2020 1 6% 22 22 22 NR
2019 17 100% 14 5 19 16
2018 6 38% NR 16 23 NR
2017 3 19% NR 20 23 NR
2016 11 69% NR 11 24 23
2015 14 88% NR 3 24 17
2014 10 59% NR 18 25 21
2010 14 88% NR 6 25 NR
2009 12 75% 19 16 24 18
2008 16 94% NR 2 22 2
2004 16 100% 20 4 20 4
2003 3 18% NR 21 25 21
1996 4 22% NR 20 24 NR
1994 11 65% NR 9 25 10
1947 1 10% NA 18 18 NR

*Utah has been ranked in 20 out of 90 polls.

Utah State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2021 1 6% NR 24 24 24
2018 5 31% NR 14 22 22
2012 4 25% NR 16 25 16
1961 1 8% NR 10 10 10
1960 2 17% NR 18 19 NR

*Utah State has been ranked in 5 out of 90 polls.


Washington football pac-12Washington
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
2023 16 100% 10 2 10 2
2022 9 56% NR 8 24 8
2021 1 6% 20 20 20 NR
2020 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2019 7 41% 13 13 25 NR
2018 15 94% 6 6 20 13
2017 16 100% 8 5 16 16
2016 16 100% 14 4 14 4
2014 1 6% 25 25 25 NR
2013 8 47% NR 15 25 25
2012 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2011 1 6% NR 22 22 NR
2009 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
2003 6 35% 17 17 22 NR
2002 9 50% 9 9 22 NR
2001 17 100% 15 8 21 19
2000 17 100% 13 3 15 3
1999 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
1998 5 31% 18 9 20 NR
1997 18 100% 4 2 21 18
1996 14 78% NR 12 25 16
1995 16 94% 24 15 24 NR
1994 13 76% 23 9 25 NR
1993 11 65% 12 12 25 NR
1992 17 100% 2 1 11 11
1991 16 100% 4 2 4 2
1990 16 100% 20 2 22 5
1989 4 24% NR 11 23 23
1988 7 41% NR 16 20 NR
1987 5 31% 13 10 18 NR
1986 15 100% 16 6 18 18
1985 2 12% 12 12 12 NR
1984 16 100% 18 1 19 2
1983 12 75% 18 9 20 NR
1982 16 100% 2 1 13 7
1981 11 73% 15 10 18 10
1980 10 63% 20 13 20 16
1979 15 100% 15 6 20 11
1978 5 33% 11 11 20 NR
1977 4 29% NR 10 19 10
1972 8 53% 9 9 18 NR
1971 10 67% NR 11 20 19
1970 1 7% NR 20 20 NR
1964 2 18% 7 7 10 NR
1963 1 8% 10 10 10 NR
1962 6 50% 10 7 10 NR
1960 12 100% 3 3 13 6
1959 8 62% NR 8 18 8
1955 4 33% NR 12 19 NR
1952 1 9% NR 17 17 NR
1951 3 27% 8 8 20 NR
1950 8 80% NR 10 19 11
1945 2 22% NA 18 18 NR
1943 7 78% NA 11 19 12
1941 1 13% NA 20 20 NR
1940 8 100% NA 10 17 10
1937 1 14% NA 13 13 NR
1936 7 100% NA 4 10 5

*Washington has been ranked in 59 out of 90 polls.


Washington State
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2024 4 24% NR 19 25 NR
2023 5 31% NR 13 23 NR
2019 4 24% 23 19 23 NR
2018 9 56% NR 7 25 10
2017 15 94% 24 8 25 NR
2016 4 25% NR 20 25 NR
2015 2 13% NR 20 24 NR
2006 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
2003 14 82% NR 6 24 9
2002 18 100% 11 3 17 10
2001 10 59% NR 9 19 10
1997 14 78% NR 8 19 9
1994 13 76% NR 16 24 21
1993 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1992 9 53% NR 13 25 15
1989 7 41% NR 15 23 NR
1988 6 35% NR 16 20 16
1981 7 47% NR 14 20 NR
1977 1 7% NR 15 15 NR
1972 5 33% NR 19 20 19
1958 1 8% NR 10 10 NR
1957 1 8% NR 19 19 NR
1952 1 9% 15 15 15 NR
1951 7 64% NR 16 18 18
1942 5 63% NA 10 17 17
1941 1 13% NA 19 19 19
1940 1 13% NA 19 19 NR
1936 4 57% NA 14 20 NR

*Washington State has been ranked in 28 out of 90 polls.

Wyoming
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
1998 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1996 12 67% NR 16 25 22
1993 2 12% NR 23 24 NR
1990 5 31% NR 18 25 NR
1988 11 65% NR 10 18 NR
1969 5 36% NR 15 19 NR
1968 4 29% NR 19 20 NR
1967 7 58% NR 6 10 6
1966 1 8% NR 10 10 NR
1959 2 15% NR 16 16 16
1956 1 8% NR 19 19 NR
1950 5 50% NR 12 18 12

*Wyoming has been ranked in 12 out of 90 polls.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

The Vikings’ Most Compelling Trade Offer for QB1 Joe Burrow

Published

on

Advertisement

Vikings head coach Kevin O'Connell in Dallas in Week 15 of 2025
Dec 14, 2025; Arlington, Texas, USA; Minnesota Vikings head coach Kevin O’Connell before a game against the Dallas Cowboys at AT&T Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kevin Jairaj-Imagn Images.

If, in the end, the new leadership group wants to go for it all, then landing an elite QB via trade could be the path forward (as difficult as that is to pull off). The Vikings’ most compelling offer may not get the job done, but it’s nevertheless something that’s worth exploring.

During the most recent regular season, Joe Burrow was in the headlines due to his public reflections on not enjoying football (who would over in Cincinnati?). Past iterations of quarterback speculation have involved Justin Herbert, Kyler Murray, and Lamar Jackson. Of that trio, only Jackson is elite and only Murray appears to be available. If, however, Burrow did become available, how formidable would the Vikings’ offer be?

The Vikings’ Most Compelling Trade Offer for Joe Burrow

Journeying into speculative rumors becomes easier when at least a portion of the discussion remains rooted in reality. As a result, consider an actual NFL trade for a franchise quarterback. Matthew Stafford is a nice comparable.

Advertisement

Check it out:

The LA Rams Receive The Detroit Lions Receive
QB Matthew Stafford QB Jared Goff
3rd-Round Pick in 2021
1st-Round Pick in 2022
1st-Round Pick in 2023

Okay, some details to pry away from the chart. Landing Mr. Stafford — a high-end passer who was 32 at the time of the trade — cost a starting level passer, a pair of 1st-Round selections, and a 3rd. Not cheap, but a deal the Rams would do again without any hesitance. Worth noting, too, that the Lions didn’t do too poorly, either.

NFL: Super Bowl LVI-Los Angeles Rams at Cincinnati Bengals
Robert Hanashiro-Imagn Images

Looking at the Stafford deals clarifies that the Vikings would need to begin any conversation with the Bengals with a pair of 1st-Round selections. The No. 18 pick in the 2026 NFL Draft alongside the top pick for 2027 (wherever it happens to land). Beginning to talk without that being the starting point means the phone line goes dead very quickly.

There would then need to be considerably more added into the mix.

Advertisement

Presumably, J.J. McCarthy would be part of the offer. The Bengals could therefore look to build around a young passer alongside whatever draft picks get added to the haul. So, the tally would be sitting at Mr. McCarthy — the No. 10 selection from 2024 who does have a ton of ability — alongside a pair of 1sts.

There would then need to be more added. Think something within the range of some Day 2 selections — 2nd and/or 3rd Round — or possibly even another 1st. Star edge rusher Trey Hendrickson is soon to leave Cincinnati behind. Would the Bengals desire Dallas Turner to build around at edge rusher?

If Cincinnati demanded two 1st-Round selections, a 2nd, J.J. McCarthy, and Dallas Turner, the Vikings should agree to the trade to bring Joe Burrow to the Twin Cities.

Joe Burrow warming up on the field at Paycor Stadium.
Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow goes through his pregame routine, loosening up and throwing on the field as teammates filter out for warmups. The image was taken Dec 14, 2025, at Paycor Stadium in Cincinnati, where anticipation built ahead of a divisional matchup with Baltimore under late-season stakes. Mandatory Credit: Joseph Maiorana-Imagn Images.

Why would the Bengals make the move? Consider some reasons:

  • Joe Burrow has publicly opened the door to that possibility with his comments.
  • The past trio of seasons have involved finishing 9-8, 9-8, and 6-11. All three years involved missing the playoffs, suggesting the current plan isn’t working particularly well.
  • On a personal level, Burrow may welcome the move due to playing with Justin Jefferson and for ownership that isn’t stingy.
  • Building up a deep collection of young players and draft assets could actually be wise.
  • Offloading Burrow’s contract would save money and cap space long term.

Oh, and another thing. A pair of high-profile quarterbacks who have been traded recently — Deshaun Watson and Russell Wilson — involved the acquiring team — Cleveland and Denver — almost instantly regretting the swap.

Admittedly, Joe Burrow is better than both of those players, but the idea can nevertheless be made that sending over a ton for a quarterback isn’t guaranteed to succeed. The Texans and Seahawks are pleased to have moved on from their former top passers. Goodness, Seattle is back in the Super Bowl and Houston is a great team.

Advertisement

In December, Joe Burrow will turn 30. He has suffered some bad injuries since turning pro in 2020. He has also established himself as being among the game’s top-five passers. Working under the tutelage of Kevin O’Connell would mean shredding the NFL.

Back in 2023, Burrow put pen to paper on a five-year extension that tips the scales at $275 million. Any trade would likely need to involve massaging the money no matter the acquiring team. As a result, Burrow’s desire to get traded to a specific location — such as Minnesota — would be vital since he would need to agree to a new deal, lowering his cap charge in the immediate.

Dec 28, 2025; Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow (9) calls signals during the second half against the Arizona Cardinals at Paycor Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Katie Stratman-Imagn Images

In 2025, Joe Burrow had to work through an injury that kept him out for a good portion of the season. He went 5-3 in his starts, completing 66.8% of his passes for 1,809 yards, 17 touchdowns, and 5 interceptions.

Burrow and Jefferson won a National Championship while playing college ball at LSU.


avatar

Senior Editor for Vikings Territory & PurplePTSD . Twitter & Bluesky: @VikingsGazette. Email: k.joudry[at]vikingsterritory[dot]com. Canadian. Jude 1:24-25.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Ex champion who fought Crawford, Haney and Davis announces fighting return after 4 years out

Published

on

A former rival of Terence Crawford, Devin Haney and Gervonta Davis is set to make a surprise return to competitive action after four years away.

Yuriorkis Gamboa was tipped by many for huge things in the sport, but came up short in his three battles with the aforementioned trio of Crawford, Haney and Davis, and last competed back in April 2022 in a loss to Isaac Cruz.

The Olympic Gold Medalist held the WBA featherweight title and the WBA interim lightweight title during his campaign, but came up short in winning a full version of a belt at 135lbs when he stepped up to challenge Crawford, before further bids at lightweight were foiled in the battles with Haney and ‘Tank.’

Advertisement

Gamboa will now attempt to find success in a new discipline altogether, after it was announced that the 44-year-old from Cuba will make the switch to BKB Bare Knuckle Boxing, much to his delight.

“Bare knuckle boxing is the oldest form of boxing. After winning an Olympic gold medal, world championships in boxing, now I’m focused and excited to become BKB Bare Knuckle World Champion. I’m going to showcase my skills and show why I belong at the very top of this sport.”

BKB Bare Knuckle founder Mike Vasquez also commented on the signing of Gamboa.

“It’s an honour to welcome Yurorkis to bare knuckle, and I can’t wait to see his skills and pedigree on display in the trigon. We’ve got some incredible Cuban fighters on our roster, including our heavyweight world champion. This year we’re going to see more and more elite fighters join our global roster of over 200 fighters from over 30 countries.”

Gamboa’s debut in the promotion is expected to be announced soon.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Pinnick Reveals Why Eberechi Eze Missed Out on Super Eagles Switch

Published

on

Former Nigeria Football Federation president Amaju Pinnick has explained why Arsenal attacking midfielder Eberechi Eze did not end up playing for the Super Eagles.

Eze, who came through the Queens Park Rangers academy, is now fully tied to England and was part of the Three Lions squad at the 2024 European Championship.

Nigeria first made a move for the talented midfielder in March 2017, when he was invited to train with the Super Eagles ahead of a friendly match against Burkina Faso. However, the game was later cancelled, denying Nigeria the chance to hand him a competitive appearance.

  • Eric Chelle at the Press Conference after Nigeria Super Eagles B loss to SudanEric Chelle at the Press Conference after Nigeria Super Eagles B loss to Sudan

Advertisement

During his time as NFF president, Pinnick actively pushed for the recruitment of players with dual nationality. His efforts helped convince players such as Alex Iwobi, Ola Aina, Joe Aribo, Semi Ajayi and Josh Maja to choose Nigeria over England.

Pinnick said his interest in Eze grew stronger ahead of Nigeria’s 2022 World Cup play-off against Ghana. He revealed that he held a private meeting with the Crystal Palace star at his home in London to discuss a possible switch.

According to Pinnick, Eze was close to committing his international future to Nigeria before changes within the football federation disrupted the process. He said talks had progressed well and involved detailed discussions with the player and his family.

Advertisement

Pinnick explained that Eze, alongside his father and sister who manages his career, had agreed in principle, but asked for time as administrative changes and elections at the NFF took place. Soon after, Pinnick left office and the move did not progress further.

He added that Eze has a strong affection for Nigeria and was positive about representing the country.

Since making his senior debut for England in a European Championship qualifier against Malta, Eze has scored three goals in 16 appearances for the national team.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Hamilton Tiger-Cats sign veteran middle linebacker Wynton McManis

Published

on

Wynton McManis wasn’t unemployed long.

The Hamilton Tiger-Cats signed the veteran middle linebacker on Wednesday, a day after he was released by the Toronto Argonauts. McManis joining the Ticats wasn’t much of a surprise, though, as he lives in Toronto year-round and has a daughter and son.

His arrival also fills a need for Hamilton after Canadian middle linebacker Devin Veresuk signed this off-season with the NFL’s Indianapolis Colts.

McManis had 62 tackles, four sacks, two interceptions and a forced fumble in 15 regular-season games last season.

Advertisement

The Memphis, Tenn., native spent four CFL campaigns with the Argos (2022-25), helping them win Grey Cups in 2022 and 2024.

The six-foot, 220-pound McManis began his CFL career with Calgary (2017-19), winning his first Grey Cup with the Stampeders in 2018.

“Wynton is one of the premier defenders in our league,” Hamilton head coach Scott Milanovich said in a statement. “He plays the game the right way — with physicality, intelligence, and a relentless motor. 

“Beyond what he brings on the field, his experience as a Grey Cup champion and his leadership in the locker room are invaluable, and we’re excited to welcome him to our organization.”

Advertisement

McManis has 390 tackles, 52 special-teams tackles, 16 sacks, nine interceptions and four forced fumbles while scoring three defensive touchdowns in 100 career regular-season CFL games.

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

How Much Do 2026 Super Bowl Tickets Cost? A Guide to Purchasing a Coveted Seat

Published

on

NEED TO KNOW

  • The New England Patriots and the Seattle Seahawks will face off in the 2026 Super on Feb. 8

  • Fans can still purchase tickets to the Super Bowl via various resale sites, though they should prepare to pay thousands of dollars to attend the big event

  • Some of the cheapest tickets currently available cost nearly $5,000

The stakes for Super Bowl LX may be high, but ticket prices are even higher.

There’s less than a week to go until the main event, which kicks off at 6:30 p.m. ET on Feb. 8 at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, Calif.

Advertisement

However, Super Bowl tickets are not released to the general public, which means that unless you’re in the NFL, a season ticket holder or an NFL partner, sponsor, or committee host, you’ll likely be shelling out top dollar for resale tickets to see the New England Patriots play the Seattle Seahawks, with prices skyrocketing in recent years.

Advertisement

It’s a big change for Super Bowl fans like Dan Crisman, who has attended every Super Bowl since the game’s 1967 inception. “I think the first Super Bowl [ticket] was $12 and now they’re in four figures,” he told PEOPLE in 2024.

He added, “It seemed like the average person could attend back in those first 20 years.”

Keep reading to find out how much a ticket to the 2026 Super Bowl will cost you, and how it compares to recent years.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Where can I buy Super Bowl tickets?

Ty Okada #39 of the Seattle Seahawks reacts after a play during the NFC Championship NFL football game against the Los Angeles Rams at Lumen Field on January 25, 2026. Kevin Sabitus/Getty
Ty Okada #39 of the Seattle Seahawks reacts after a play during the NFC Championship NFL football game against the Los Angeles Rams at Lumen Field on January 25, 2026.

Kevin Sabitus/Getty

Super Bowl tickets cannot be purchased directly by the general public.

However, resale tickets are available on Ticketmaster, which is the NFL’s official ticketing partner.

Tickets are also available on alternate resale sites, such as Stubhub, SeatGeek and Vivid Seats.

Advertisement

On Location Experiences, a.k.a. the Super Bowl’s “official hospitality provider,” is also offering NFL Super Bowl packages starting at $6,000 per person, which include an official ticket to the game, an open bar and takeout menu, “NFL Legend” appearances and live music.

What’s the cheapest Super Bowl ticket?

Garrett Bradbury #65 of the New England Patriots runs out of the tunnel prior to the AFC Championship NFL football game against the Denver Broncos at Empower Field At Mile High on January 25, 2026. Cooper Neill/Getty
Garrett Bradbury #65 of the New England Patriots runs out of the tunnel prior to the AFC Championship NFL football game against the Denver Broncos at Empower Field At Mile High on January 25, 2026.

Cooper Neill/Getty

As of Feb. 3, one of the cheapest single Super Bowl tickets available is in section 420 for $4,836 on Vivid Seats.

Advertisement

Advertisement

What’s the most expensive Super Bowl ticket?

Fireworks explode over Raymond James Stadium at half time during Super Bowl LV between the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Kansas City Chiefs on February 07, 2021. Douglas P. DeFelice/Getty
Fireworks explode over Raymond James Stadium at half time during Super Bowl LV between the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Kansas City Chiefs on February 07, 2021.

Douglas P. DeFelice/Getty

As of Feb. 3, one of the most expensive single Super Bowl tickets currently up for grabs is a VIP seat in section 139, which has an eyeline view of the field, priced at $59,290 on Ticketmaster.

Do Super Bowl tickets get cheaper closer to the game?

Julian Love #20 of the Seattle Seahawks tackles Antonio Gibson #4 of the New England Patriots at Gillette Stadium on September 15, 2024. Adam Glanzman/Getty
Julian Love #20 of the Seattle Seahawks tackles Antonio Gibson #4 of the New England Patriots at Gillette Stadium on September 15, 2024.

Adam Glanzman/Getty

According to data from more than 900,000 aftermarket NFL ticket compiled by SeatData.io and analyzed by Finance Buzz in September 2025, NFL tickets are less expensive closer to kickoff time during the regular season, though not by much, with an average of $20 in savings when purchased during game week. By contrast, fans who purchased their tickets three weeks or more in advance paid 3% more than the average ticket price.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Prices for the 2026 Super Bowl have already begun to drop, per TickPick, with the average price per ticket at nearly $10,000 10 days before the game, compared to about $6,400 six days before.

According to the NFL, tickets will be available for resale on the NFL Ticket Exchange up to 60 minutes after kickoff.

Are Super Bowl tickets more expensive this year than normal?

Jabrill Peppers #5 of the New England Patriots tackles Jaxon Smith-Njigba #11 of the Seattle Seahawks during the game at Gillette Stadium on September 15, 2024. Adam Glanzman/Getty
Jabrill Peppers #5 of the New England Patriots tackles Jaxon Smith-Njigba #11 of the Seattle Seahawks during the game at Gillette Stadium on September 15, 2024.

Adam Glanzman/Getty

Advertisement

As of Feb. 4, 2-26 Super Bowl ticket prices are pacing above the average prices paid in 2025 to see the Kansas City Chiefs lose to the Philadelphia Eagles.

CBS reported that the cost of Super Bowl 2025 tickets ranged from roughly $3,000 to roughly $5,000.

Advertisement

They aren’t the highest Super Bowl prices in history, however: 2024 set the record, with an average ticket price of $9,800, per CNN.

Advertisement

How much were Super Bowl tickets in the recent years?

Zach Charbonnet #26 of the Seattle Seahawks runs with the ball as Marcus Jones #25 of the New England Patriots looks for the tackle during a game at Gillette Stadium on September 15, 2024. Jaiden Tripi/Getty
Zach Charbonnet #26 of the Seattle Seahawks runs with the ball as Marcus Jones #25 of the New England Patriots looks for the tackle during a game at Gillette Stadium on September 15, 2024.

Jaiden Tripi/Getty

Super Bowl ticket prices have fluctuated in recent years, though average ticket costs have typically trended upward, peaking in 2024.

Below are the average Super Bowl ticket prices seven days before the game from 2022 and 2025, according to TickPick.

2022

Teams: Los Angeles Rams vs. Cincinnati Bengals

Advertisement

Average ticket price: $6,565

2023

Teams: Kansas City Chiefs vs. Philadelphia Eagles

Average ticket price: $7,121

2024

Teams: Kansas City Chiefs vs. San Francisco 49ers

Advertisement

Advertisement

Average ticket price: $9,014

2025

Teams: Kansas City Chiefs vs. Philadelphia Eagles

Average ticket price: $5,753

Advertisement

Read the original article on People

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Great team with a great history

Published

on

Karim Benzema has likened his new team, Al-Hilal, to his former employers, Real Madrid, saying the Saudi Pro League side reminds him of Los Blancos in terms of rich history.

The Frenchman on Monday completed a shock deadline day move from Al-Ittihad to Al-Hilal on a free transfer. Benzema’s contract with Al-Ittihad was due to run out in June, but negotiations over renewal collapsed, and Al-Hilal took full advantage of the situation, signing the 38-year-old on a one-and-a-half-year deal.

Speaking to Al-Hilal media after his first training session in the blue jersey, Benzema was asked what he knows about the club.

Advertisement

“It’s a great team with a great history,” he said. “They won a lot of trophies. It’s like similar, like Real Madrid here in Asia, you know. Everything is good, the fans are good, they play well, they have good players, and they have a good mentality, they have a good process. So I liked this team before, I used to play against them with Madrid, it was not an easy game, it was a good game, so I have good memories, and today I’m happy because now I’m playing for Al-Hilal.”

Al-Hilal and Real Madrid share the same history as the most successful team in their respective division. The Blue Waves are Saudi Arabia’s most successful team, with 21 league titles and four Asian Championships. Similarly, Los Blancos have won the most league titles in the Spanish division, winning it a record 36 times.

The 2022 Ballon d’Or winner guided Al-Ittihad to the league and King’s Cup glory last season. With Al-Hilal sitting atop the league table, they will be keen to leverage the forward’s experience to guide them to their 22nd league title.

Karim Benzema hungry for more silverware after Al-Hilal switch

Amid the controversy surrounding his move to Al-Hilal, Karim Benzema expressed his desire to win more trophies with the Riyadh-based club. Joining Al-Ittihad in 2023, Benzema went trophyless in his debut season but responded with a domestic double in his second campaign.

Regarding his ambitions at Al-Hilal, the 38-year-old stated:

Advertisement

“Clear message, you know, my mentality. I have a lot of ambition. I will work, I will give everything in the pitch, I will help this team, and Inshallah bring trophies, because for me it’s more important to bring trophies, and we have, what I said before, good team, good fans, so together, Inshallah, we will do it.”

The striker has scored eight goals in 14 league appearances this season and is expected to make his Al-Hilal debut on Thursday against Al Okhdood.