By SuperWest Sports Staff
Sports
Updated All-Time AP Football Polls by Program and Year
The Associated Press (AP) Football Poll has run continuously since 1936. Up to 1960, the poll ranked only 20 teams. From 1961 to 1967, it was reduced to just the Top 10.
The Poll returned to ranking the Top 20 teams in 1968, retaining that format through 1988. In 1989, it was expanded to the Top 25 and has not altered its count since.
Initially, AP did not conduct a preseason poll, adding it in 1950.
Through 1968, except for the 1965 poll, AP crowned its national football champion after the regular season, before the bowl games were played.
That changed in 1964, when the regular-season AP champ, Alabama, lost the Orange Bowl to Texas.
Consequently, the news organization made plans to hold its poll after the bowl season, beginning in 1967, to award its national title.
Below you will find tables for the top football programs in the West, including:
- The years in which they have appeared in the AP Poll
- The number of appearances for each season
- The percentage of the season in which they were ranked
- Their high and low rankings for each year
- Their preseason and final rankings, if any
Following those lists is a table with the total number of polls each program has appeared in its history.
USC leads the way in that category, having missed just five of the 90 all-time polls (as of the 2025 Final Poll).
Air Force
| Season | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 19% | NR | 17 | 22 | NR |
| 2019 | 3 | 18% | NR | 22 | 25 | 22 |
| 2010 | 2 | 13% | NR | 23 | 25 | NR |
| 2002 | 3 | 17% | NR | 18 | 22 | NR |
| 1999 | 1 | 6% | NR | 24 | 24 | NR |
| 1998 | 8 | 50% | NR | 13 | 25 | 13 |
| 1997 | 6 | 33% | NR | 18 | 24 | NR |
| 1995 | 1 | 6% | NR | 21 | 21 | NR |
| 1991 | 1 | 6% | NR | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| 1989 | 4 | 24% | NR | 17 | 24 | NR |
| 1985 | 13 | 76% | NR | 4 | 19 | 8 |
| 1983 | 4 | 25% | NR | 13 | 18 | 13 |
| 1972 | 4 | 27% | NR | 16 | 19 | NR |
| 1971 | 2 | 13% | NR | 18 | 20 | NR |
| 1970 | 13 | 87% | NR | 7 | 20 | 16 |
| 1969 | 4 | 29% | NR | 19 | 20 | NR |
| 1959 | 5 | 38% | 15 | 15 | 18 | NR |
| 1958 | 7 | 58% | NR | 6 | 14 | 6 |
*Air Force has been ranked in 18 out of 90 polls.
Arizona
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2 | 12% | NR | 21 | 22 | NR |
| 2024 | 3 | 18% | 21 | 20 | 21 | NR |
| 2023 | 6 | 38% | NR | 11 | 23 | 11 |
| 2017 | 1 | 6% | NR | 23 | 23 | NR |
| 2015 | 4 | 25% | 22 | 16 | 22 | NR |
| 2014 | 11 | 65% | NR | 8 | 21 | 19 |
| 2012 | 3 | 19% | NR | 22 | 24 | NR |
| 2010 | 11 | 69% | NR | 9 | 24 | NR |
| 2009 | 4 | 25% | NR | 18 | 23 | NR |
| 2000 | 3 | 18% | NR | 21 | 24 | NR |
| 1999 | 4 | 24% | 4 | 4 | 19 | NR |
| 1998 | 16 | 100% | 24 | 4 | 24 | 4 |
| 1995 | 5 | 29% | 19 | 17 | 25 | NR |
| 1994 | 17 | 100% | 7 | 6 | 20 | 20 |
| 1993 | 17 | 100% | 14 | 7 | 19 | 10 |
| 1992 | 8 | 47% | NR | 9 | 23 | NR |
| 1990 | 7 | 44% | NR | 16 | 25 | NR |
| 1989 | 9 | 53% | 18 | 15 | 25 | 25 |
| 1986 | 13 | 87% | NR | 10 | 17 | 11 |
| 1983 | 8 | 50% | 14 | 3 | 19 | NR |
| 1975 | 15 | 100% | 16 | 11 | 18 | 18 |
| 1974 | 9 | 60% | 17 | 9 | 19 | NR |
| 1973 | 2 | 13% | NR | 19 | 19 | NR |
| 1968 | 1 | 7% | NR | 19 | 19 | NR |
*Arizona has been ranked in 24 out of 90 polls.
Arizona State
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5 | 29% | 11 | 11 | 25 | NR |
| 2024 | 5 | 29% | NR | 7 | 21 | 7 |
| 2021 | 5 | 31% | 25 | 18 | 25 | NR |
| 2019 | 5 | 29% | NR | 17 | 24 | NR |
| 2018 | 1 | 6% | NR | 23 | 23 | NR |
| 2015 | 1 | 6% | 15 | 15 | 15 | NR |
| 2014 | 16 | 94% | 19 | 7 | 20 | 12 |
| 2013 | 10 | 59% | NR | 11 | 25 | 20 |
| 2011 | 7 | 44% | NR | 18 | 25 | NR |
| 2008 | 3 | 18% | 15 | 15 | 15 | NR |
| 2007 | 12 | 75% | NR | 6 | 23 | 16 |
| 2006 | 4 | 25% | 24 | 22 | 25 | NR |
| 2005 | 6 | 38% | 20 | 14 | 20 | NR |
| 2004 | 13 | 81% | NR | 15 | 23 | 19 |
| 2003 | 4 | 24% | 22 | 16 | 22 | NR |
| 2002 | 3 | 17% | NR | 16 | 25 | NR |
| 1999 | 4 | 24% | 25 | 22 | 25 | NR |
| 1998 | 2 | 13% | 8 | 8 | 14 | NR |
| 1997 | 13 | 72% | NR | 12 | 25 | 14 |
| 1996 | 18 | 100% | 20 | 2 | 20 | 4 |
| 1993 | 1 | 6% | NR | 23 | 23 | NR |
| 1991 | 2 | 13% | NR | 24 | 25 | NR |
| 1990 | 3 | 19% | NR | 21 | 25 | NR |
| 1987 | 7 | 44% | 14 | 12 | 20 | 20 |
| 1986 | 13 | 87% | NR | 4 | 18 | 4 |
| 1984 | 2 | 13% | 13 | 12 | 13 | NR |
| 1983 | 4 | 25% | NR | 13 | 20 | NR |
| 1982 | 16 | 100% | 19 | 3 | 19 | 6 |
| 1981 | 13 | 87% | 20 | 9 | 20 | 16 |
| 1980 | 1 | 6% | NR | 20 | 20 | NR |
| 1979 | 1 | 7% | 18 | 18 | 18 | NR |
| 1978 | 2 | 13% | NR | 12 | 14 | NR |
| 1977 | 8 | 57% | 17 | 12 | 20 | 18 |
| 1976 | 2 | 14% | 3 | 3 | 18 | NR |
| 1975 | 13 | 87% | NR | 2 | 18 | 2 |
| 1974 | 10 | 67% | 15 | 7 | 18 | NR |
| 1973 | 15 | 100% | 14 | 8 | 14 | 9 |
| 1972 | 12 | 80% | 12 | 10 | 19 | 13 |
| 1971 | 15 | 100% | 14 | 8 | 16 | 8 |
| 1970 | 14 | 93% | 19 | 6 | 20 | 6 |
| 1969 | 1 | 7% | NR | 18 | 18 | NR |
| 1968 | 5 | 36% | 17 | 14 | 20 | NR |
| 1960 | 1 | 8% | NR | 18 | 18 | NR |
| 1957 | 3 | 25% | NR | 11 | 17 | 12 |
*Arizona State has been ranked in 44 out of 90 polls.
Boise State
| Season | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 | 6% | 25 | 25 | 25 | NR |
| 2024 | 13 | 76% | NR | 8 | 25 | 8 |
| 2020 | 2 | 12% | NR | 21 | 25 | NR |
| 2019 | 16 | 94% | NR | 14 | 24 | 23 |
| 2018 | 8 | 50% | 22 | 17 | 23 | 23 |
| 2017 | 3 | 19% | NR | 22 | 25 | 22 |
| 2016 | 9 | 56% | NR | 13 | 24 | NR |
| 2015 | 4 | 25% | 23 | 20 | 25 | NR |
| 2014 | 4 | 24% | NR | 16 | 25 | 16 |
| 2013 | 1 | 6% | 19 | 19 | 19 | NR |
| 2012 | 10 | 63% | 24 | 18 | 25 | 18 |
| 2011 | 16 | 100% | 5 | 4 | 10 | 8 |
| 2010 | 16 | 100% | 3 | 2 | 10 | 9 |
| 2009 | 16 | 100% | 14 | 4 | 14 | 4 |
| 2008 | 13 | 76% | NR | 9 | 19 | 11 |
| 2007 | 8 | 50% | 24 | 17 | 24 | NR |
| 2006 | 13 | 81% | NR | 5 | 25 | 5 |
| 2005 | 1 | 6% | 18 | 18 | 18 | NR |
| 2004 | 14 | 88% | NR | 10 | 23 | 12 |
| 2003 | 6 | 35% | NR | 16 | 24 | 16 |
| 2002 | 5 | 28% | NR | 15 | 23 | 15 |
*Boise State has been ranked in 21 out of 90 polls.
BYU
| Season | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 13 | 76% | NR | 8 | 25 | 11 |
| 2024 | 13 | 76% | NR | 7 | 22 | 13 |
| 2022 | 6 | 38% | 25 | 12 | 25 | NR |
| 2021 | 13 | 81% | NR | 10 | 25 | 19 |
| 2020 | 16 | 94% | NR | 8 | 22 | 11 |
| 2018 | 2 | 13% | NR | 20 | 25 | NR |
| 2015 | 2 | 13% | NR | 19 | 22 | NR |
| 2014 | 4 | 24% | NR | 18 | 25 | NR |
| 2012 | 1 | 6% | NR | 25 | 25 | NR |
| 2009 | 15 | 94% | 20 | 7 | 25 | 12 |
| 2008 | 17 | 100% | 16 | 8 | 25 | 25 |
| 2007 | 4 | 25% | NR | 14 | 23 | 14 |
| 2006 | 6 | 38% | NR | 16 | 25 | 16 |
| 2001 | 14 | 82% | NR | 8 | 25 | 25 |
| 1999 | 9 | 53% | NR | 15 | 25 | NR |
| 1997 | 6 | 33% | 19 | 19 | 24 | NR |
| 1996 | 16 | 89% | NR | 5 | 24 | 5 |
| 1994 | 10 | 59% | NR | 18 | 25 | 18 |
| 1993 | 7 | 41% | 19 | 19 | 21 | NR |
| 1992 | 5 | 29% | 24 | 24 | 25 | NR |
| 1991 | 4 | 25% | 19 | 19 | 25 | 23 |
| 1990 | 16 | 100% | 16 | 4 | 22 | 22 |
| 1989 | 13 | 76% | 19 | 18 | 25 | 22 |
| 1988 | 1 | 6% | NR | 20 | 20 | NR |
| 1986 | 3 | 20% | 18 | 11 | 18 | NR |
| 1985 | 17 | 100% | 10 | 7 | 18 | 16 |
| 1984 | 15 | 94% | NR | 1 | 13 | 1 |
| 1983 | 11 | 69% | NR | 7 | 20 | 7 |
| 1981 | 12 | 80% | 16 | 8 | 18 | 13 |
| 1980 | 9 | 56% | NR | 12 | 19 | 12 |
| 1979 | 11 | 73% | NR | 9 | 20 | 13 |
| 1977 | 12 | 86% | NR | 13 | 20 | 20 |
| 1974 | 2 | 13% | NR | 17 | 20 | NR |
*BYU has been ranked in 33 out of 90 polls.
California
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 12% | NR | 15 | 23 | NR |
| 2018 | 1 | 6% | NR | 24 | 24 | NR |
| 2015 | 4 | 25% | NR | 20 | 24 | NR |
| 2009 | 8 | 50% | 12 | 6 | 24 | NR |
| 2008 | 3 | 18% | NR | 21 | 25 | NR |
| 2007 | 10 | 63% | 12 | 2 | 24 | NR |
| 2006 | 16 | 100% | 9 | 8 | 22 | 14 |
| 2005 | 11 | 69% | 19 | 10 | 25 | 25 |
| 2004 | 16 | 100% | 12 | 4 | 12 | 9 |
| 2002 | 1 | 6% | NR | 23 | 23 | NR |
| 1996 | 2 | 11% | NR | 19 | 21 | NR |
| 1993 | 6 | 35% | NR | 16 | 25 | 25 |
| 1992 | 4 | 24% | 20 | 17 | 24 | NR |
| 1991 | 13 | 81% | NR | 6 | 24 | 8 |
| 1977 | 5 | 36% | NR | 14 | 20 | NR |
| 1976 | 1 | 7% | 15 | 15 | 15 | NR |
| 1975 | 6 | 40% | NR | 11 | 18 | 14 |
| 1974 | 4 | 27% | NR | 18 | 20 | NR |
| 1968 | 7 | 50% | NR | 8 | 18 | NR |
| 1958 | 3 | 25% | NR | 16 | 19 | 16 |
| 1954 | 3 | 25% | 12 | 12 | 18 | NR |
| 1953 | 2 | 18% | 14 | 14 | 16 | NR |
| 1952 | 6 | 55% | 8 | 3 | 11 | NR |
| 1951 | 11 | 100% | 5 | 1 | 19 | 12 |
| 1950 | 10 | 100% | 14 | 4 | 14 | 5 |
| 1949 | 9 | 100% | NA | 2 | 10 | 3 |
| 1948 | 9 | 100% | NA | 4 | 9 | 4 |
| 1947 | 10 | 100% | NA | 4 | 15 | 15 |
| 1944 | 1 | 11% | NA | 12 | 12 | NR |
| 1943 | 1 | 11% | NA | 20 | 20 | NR |
| 1938 | 8 | 100% | NA | 3 | 14 | 14 |
| 1937 | 7 | 100% | NA | 1 | 2 | 2 |
*Cal has been ranked in 32 out of 90 polls.
Colorado
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8 | 47% | NR | 16 | 25 | 25 |
| 2023 | 3 | 19% | NR | 18 | 22 | NR |
| 2020 | 1 | 6% | NR | 21 | 21 | NR |
| 2018 | 2 | 13% | NR | 19 | 21 | NR |
| 2016 | 9 | 56% | NR | 9 | 23 | 17 |
| 2005 | 3 | 19% | NR | 22 | 25 | NR |
| 2003 | 2 | 12% | NR | 17 | 24 | NR |
| 2002 | 14 | 78% | 7 | 7 | 23 | 20 |
| 2001 | 11 | 65% | NR | 3 | 25 | 9 |
| 2000 | 2 | 12% | 24 | 23 | 24 | NR |
| 1999 | 2 | 12% | 15 | 14 | 15 | NR |
| 1998 | 8 | 50% | NR | 14 | 24 | NR |
| 1997 | 8 | 44% | 8 | 8 | 24 | NR |
| 1996 | 18 | 100% | 5 | 5 | 12 | 8 |
| 1995 | 17 | 100% | 13 | 4 | 14 | 5 |
| 1994 | 17 | 100% | 8 | 2 | 8 | 3 |
| 1993 | 17 | 100% | 11 | 7 | 23 | 16 |
| 1992 | 17 | 100% | 12 | 7 | 16 | 13 |
| 1991 | 16 | 100% | 13 | 12 | 25 | 20 |
| 1990 | 16 | 100% | 5 | 1 | 20 | 1 |
| 1989 | 17 | 100% | 14 | 1 | 14 | 4 |
| 1988 | 1 | 6% | NR | 19 | 19 | NR |
| 1978 | 4 | 27% | NR | 13 | 19 | NR |
| 1977 | 8 | 57% | 12 | 3 | 15 | NR |
| 1976 | 7 | 50% | NR | 12 | 19 | 16 |
| 1975 | 11 | 73% | NR | 9 | 19 | 16 |
| 1973 | 7 | 47% | 11 | 10 | 19 | NR |
| 1972 | 15 | 100% | 2 | 2 | 16 | 16 |
| 1971 | 14 | 93% | NR | 3 | 13 | 3 |
| 1970 | 6 | 40% | NR | 8 | 19 | NR |
| 1969 | 2 | 14% | NR | 16 | 18 | 16 |
| 1967 | 8 | 67% | 10 | 3 | 10 | NR |
| 1961 | 8 | 67% | NR | 6 | 10 | 7 |
| 1960 | 1 | 8% | NR | 18 | 18 | NR |
| 1958 | 3 | 25% | NR | 9 | 19 | NR |
| 1957 | 1 | 8% | NR | 18 | 18 | NR |
| 1956 | 4 | 33% | NR | 18 | 20 | 20 |
| 1955 | 2 | 17% | NR | 14 | 20 | NR |
| 1954 | 2 | 17% | NR | 11 | 17 | NR |
| 1937 | 4 | 57% | NA | 16 | 17 | 17 |
*Colorado has been ranked in 40 out of 90 polls.
Colorado State
| Season | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 3 | 18% | NR | 21 | 23 | NR |
| 2003 | 1 | 6% | 23 | 23 | 23 | NR |
| 2002 | 11 | 61% | NR | 16 | 25 | NR |
| 2001 | 2 | 12% | 24 | 24 | 24 | NR |
| 2000 | 3 | 18% | NR | 14 | 23 | 14 |
| 1999 | 2 | 12% | NR | 23 | 24 | NR |
| 1998 | 1 | 6% | 15 | 15 | 15 | NR |
| 1997 | 8 | 44% | NR | 17 | 25 | 17 |
| 1994 | 12 | 71% | NR | 10 | 24 | 16 |
*Colorado State has been ranked in 9 out of 90 polls.
Fresno State
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 13% | NR | 24 | 25 | NR |
| 2022 | 1 | 6% | NR | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| 2021 | 3 | 19% | NR | 18 | 25 | NR |
| 2018 | 5 | 31% | NR | 16 | 25 | 18 |
| 2017 | 1 | 6% | NR | 25 | 25 | NR |
| 2013 | 12 | 71% | NR | 15 | 25 | NR |
| 2008 | 5 | 29% | NR | 21 | 25 | NR |
| 2005 | 10 | 63% | 24 | 16 | 24 | NR |
| 2004 | 4 | 25% | NR | 17 | 22 | 22 |
| 2001 | 11 | 65% | NR | 8 | 23 | NR |
| 1993 | 2 | 12% | NR | 25 | 25 | NR |
| 1992 | 1 | 6% | NR | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| 1991 | 1 | 6% | NR | 25 | 25 | NR |
| 1990 | 2 | 13% | NR | 24 | 24 | NR |
| 1989 | 3 | 18% | NR | 23 | 25 | NR |
| 1986 | 1 | 7% | NR | 19 | 19 | NR |
| 1942 | 1 | 13% | NR | 18 | 18 | NR |
*Fresno State has been ranked in 17 out of 90 polls.
Hawai’i
| Season | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2 | 13% | NR | 24 | 25 | NR |
| 2007 | 16 | 100% | 23 | 10 | 24 | 19 |
| 2006 | 2 | 13% | NR | 24 | 25 | NR |
| 1992 | 2 | 12% | NR | 20 | 24 | 20 |
| 1989 | 5 | 29% | NR | 23 | 25 | NR |
| 1981 | 1 | 7% | NR | 19 | 19 | NR |
*Hawai’i has been ranked in 6 out of 90 polls.
Nevada
| Season | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 10 | 63% | NR | 11 | 25 | 11 |
| 1948 | 6 | 67% | N/A | 10 | 19 | NR |
*Nevada has been ranked in 2 out of 90 polls.
New Mexico
No appearances.
Oregon
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17 | 100% | 7 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
| 2024 | 17 | 100% | 3 | 1 | 9 | 3 |
| 2023 | 16 | 100% | 15 | 5 | 15 | 6 |
| 2022 | 15 | 94% | 11 | 6 | 25 | 15 |
| 2021 | 16 | 100% | 11 | 3 | 22 | 22 |
| 2020 | 12 | 71% | 9 | 9 | 25 | NR |
| 2019 | 17 | 100% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 5 |
| 2018 | 9 | 56% | 24 | 12 | 24 | NR |
| 2017 | 1 | 6% | NR | 24 | 24 | NR |
| 2016 | 3 | 19% | 24 | 22 | 24 | NR |
| 2015 | 9 | 56% | 7 | 7 | 23 | 19 |
| 2014 | 17 | 100% | 3 | 2 | 12 | 2 |
| 2013 | 17 | 100% | 3 | 2 | 12 | 9 |
| 2012 | 16 | 100% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 2 |
| 2011 | 16 | 100% | 3 | 3 | 13 | 4 |
| 2010 | 16 | 100% | 11 | 1 | 11 | 3 |
| 2009 | 13 | 81% | 16 | 7 | 16 | 11 |
| 2008 | 11 | 65% | 21 | 10 | 24 | 10 |
| 2007 | 13 | 81% | NR | 2 | 23 | 23 |
| 2006 | 11 | 69% | 21 | 11 | 25 | NR |
| 2005 | 12 | 75% | NR | 6 | 25 | 12 |
| 2004 | 2 | 13% | 23 | 23 | 24 | NR |
| 2003 | 3 | 18% | NR | 10 | 22 | NR |
| 2002 | 13 | 72% | 15 | 6 | 23 | NR |
| 2001 | 17 | 100% | 7 | 2 | 11 | 2 |
| 2000 | 12 | 71% | NR | 5 | 20 | 7 |
| 1999 | 2 | 12% | NR | 19 | 25 | 19 |
| 1998 | 14 | 88% | NR | 11 | 24 | NR |
| 1996 | 1 | 6% | NR | 25 | 25 | NR |
| 1995 | 15 | 88% | NR | 10 | 24 | 18 |
| 1994 | 7 | 41% | NR | 11 | 21 | 11 |
| 1990 | 5 | 31% | NR | 19 | 25 | NR |
| 1989 | 2 | 12% | NR | 22 | 23 | NR |
| 1988 | 3 | 18% | NR | 18 | 20 | NR |
| 1987 | 1 | 6% | NR | 16 | 16 | NR |
| 1970 | 2 | 13% | NR | 16 | 19 | NR |
| 1964 | 2 | 18% | NR | 7 | 10 | NR |
| 1960 | 1 | 8% | NR | 19 | 19 | NR |
| 1959 | 5 | 38% | NR | 11 | 16 | NR |
| 1958 | 2 | 17% | NR | 14 | 15 | NR |
| 1957 | 5 | 42% | NR | 13 | 18 | NR |
| 1956 | 1 | 8% | NR | 18 | 18 | NR |
| 1954 | 2 | 17% | 18 | 16 | 18 | NR |
| 1948 | 6 | 67% | NA | 9 | 16 | 9 |
| 1946 | 1 | 11% | NA | 19 | 19 | NR |
| 1941 | 1 | 13% | NA | 16 | 16 | NR |
| 1939 | 1 | 11% | NA | 11 | 11 | NR |
*Oregon has been ranked in 47 out of 90 polls.
Oregon State
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 15 | 94% | 18 | 10 | 21 | NR |
| 2022 | 6 | 38% | NR | 16 | 25 | 17 |
| 2013 | 1 | 6% | 25 | 25 | 25 | NR |
| 2012 | 12 | 75% | NR | 7 | 20 | 20 |
| 2010 | 4 | 25% | 24 | 24 | 25 | NR |
| 2009 | 4 | 25% | NR | 13 | 20 | NR |
| 2008 | 6 | 35% | NR | 17 | 25 | 18 |
| 2007 | 1 | 6% | NR | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| 2006 | 2 | 13% | NR | 21 | 24 | 21 |
| 2003 | 2 | 12% | NR | 22 | 24 | NR |
| 2002 | 1 | 6% | NR | 23 | 23 | NR |
| 2001 | 5 | 29% | 11 | 10 | 22 | NR |
| 2000 | 11 | 65% | NR | 4 | 23 | 4 |
| 1968 | 10 | 71% | 6 | 6 | 20 | 15 |
| 1967 | 3 | 25% | NR | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| 1964 | 3 | 27% | NR | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| 1960 | 4 | 33% | NR | 10 | 18 | NR |
| 1958 | 1 | 8% | 12 | 12 | 12 | NR |
| 1957 | 6 | 50% | 13 | 7 | 19 | NR |
| 1956 | 6 | 50% | NR | 10 | 17 | 10 |
| 1955 | 1 | 8% | NR | 19 | 19 | NR |
| 1951 | 2 | 18% | NR | 15 | 18 | NR |
| 1941 | 5 | 63% | NA | 12 | 18 | 12 |
| 1940 | 2 | 25% | NA | 18 | 19 | NR |
| 1939 | 3 | 33% | NA | 11 | 19 | NR |
*Oregon State has been ranked in 25 out of 90 polls.
San Diego State
| Season | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 8 | 50% | NR | 19 | 25 | 25 |
| 2019 | 2 | 12% | NR | 24 | 25 | NR |
| 2017 | 4 | 25% | NR | 19 | 22 | NR |
| 2016 | 4 | 25% | NR | 19 | 25 | 25 |
| 1995 | 1 | 6% | NR | 25 | 25 | NR |
| 1992 | 2 | 12% | NR | 21 | 23 | NR |
| 1977 | 3 | 21% | NR | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| 1975 | 2 | 13% | NR | 13 | 18 | NR |
| 1974 | 1 | 7% | NR | 20 | 20 | NR |
| 1970 | 5 | 33% | NR | 14 | 17 | NR |
*San Diego State has been ranked in 10 out of 90 polls.
San Jose State
| Season | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3 | 18% | NR | 19 | 25 | 24 |
| 2012 | 2 | 13% | NR | 21 | 24 | 21 |
| 1975 | 1 | 7% | NR | 20 | 20 | NR |
| 1939 | 2 | 22% | N/A | 18 | 19 | NR |
*San Jose State has been ranked in 4 out of 90 polls.
Stanford
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 12% | 25 | 23 | 25 | NR |
| 2018 | 7 | 44% | 13 | 7 | 24 | NR |
| 2017 | 12 | 75% | 14 | 14 | 23 | 20 |
| 2016 | 9 | 56% | 8 | 7 | 17 | 12 |
| 2015 | 14 | 88% | 21 | 3 | 21 | 3 |
| 2014 | 8 | 47% | 11 | 11 | 25 | NR |
| 2013 | 17 | 100% | 4 | 4 | 13 | 11 |
| 2012 | 16 | 100% | 21 | 7 | 25 | 7 |
| 2011 | 16 | 100% | 7 | 3 | 8 | 7 |
| 2010 | 15 | 94% | NR | 4 | 25 | 4 |
| 2009 | 4 | 25% | NR | 14 | 25 | NR |
| 2001 | 11 | 65% | NR | 10 | 23 | 16 |
| 1999 | 2 | 12% | NR | 22 | 22 | NR |
| 1997 | 9 | 50% | 18 | 16 | 25 | NR |
| 1995 | 4 | 24% | NR | 16 | 23 | NR |
| 1994 | 2 | 12% | NR | 24 | 25 | NR |
| 1993 | 5 | 29% | 15 | 15 | 23 | NR |
| 1992 | 17 | 100% | 17 | 8 | 21 | 9 |
| 1991 | 5 | 31% | NR | 17 | 22 | 22 |
| 1986 | 5 | 33% | NR | 16 | 20 | NR |
| 1981 | 2 | 13% | 18 | 18 | 19 | NR |
| 1980 | 6 | 38% | 15 | 11 | 20 | NR |
| 1979 | 1 | 7% | 13 | 13 | 13 | NR |
| 1978 | 4 | 27% | NR | 17 | 20 | 17 |
| 1977 | 1 | 7% | NR | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 1975 | 2 | 13% | 20 | 18 | 20 | NR |
| 1974 | 2 | 13% | NR | 19 | 20 | NR |
| 1972 | 7 | 47% | 20 | 13 | 20 | NR |
| 1971 | 15 | 100% | 19 | 10 | 19 | 10 |
| 1970 | 15 | 100% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 8 |
| 1969 | 13 | 93% | 16 | 13 | 19 | 19 |
| 1968 | 2 | 14% | NR | 14 | 18 | NR |
| 1957 | 2 | 17% | NR | 16 | 17 | NR |
| 1956 | 4 | 33% | 14 | 10 | 20 | NR |
| 1955 | 4 | 33% | NR | 16 | 20 | 16 |
| 1954 | 1 | 8% | NR | 17 | 17 | NR |
| 1953 | 7 | 64% | NR | 11 | 20 | 19 |
| 1952 | 2 | 18% | 13 | 13 | 13 | NR |
| 1951 | 9 | 82% | NR | 3 | 19 | 7 |
| 1950 | 4 | 40% | 7 | 6 | 8 | NR |
| 1949 | 3 | 33% | NA | 12 | 17 | NR |
| 1946 | 1 | 11% | NA | 17 | 17 | NR |
| 1942 | 2 | 25% | NA | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| 1941 | 5 | 63% | NA | 6 | 19 | NR |
| 1940 | 8 | 100% | NA | 2 | 10 | 2 |
| 1937 | 1 | 14% | NA | 13 | 13 | NR |
*Stanford has been ranked in 46 out of 90 polls.
UNLV
| Season | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | 35% | NR | 19 | 25 | 23 |
*UNLV has been ranked in 1 out of 90 polls.
UCLA
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 38% | NR | 18 | 25 | NR |
| 2022 | 11 | 69% | NR | 9 | 21 | 21 |
| 2021 | 4 | 25% | NR | 13 | 24 | NR |
| 2017 | 1 | 6% | NR | 16 | 25 | NR |
| 2016 | 1 | 6% | 16 | 16 | 16 | NR |
| 2015 | 11 | 69% | 13 | 7 | 24 | NR |
| 2014 | 16 | 94% | 7 | 7 | 25 | 10 |
| 2013 | 17 | 100% | 21 | 9 | 22 | 16 |
| 2012 | 9 | 56% | NR | 15 | 25 | NR |
| 2008 | 1 | 6% | NR | 23 | 23 | NR |
| 2007 | 3 | 19% | 14 | 11 | 14 | NR |
| 2005 | 13 | 81% | NR | 7 | 25 | 16 |
| 2002 | 3 | 17% | NR | 20 | 25 | NR |
| 2001 | 12 | 71% | 17 | 4 | 20 | NR |
| 2000 | 7 | 41% | NR | 6 | 23 | NR |
| 1999 | 5 | 29% | 16 | 14 | 21 | NR |
| 1998 | 16 | 100% | 7 | 2 | 8 | 8 |
| 1997 | 14 | 78% | NR | 5 | 24 | 5 |
| 1995 | 7 | 41% | 16 | 12 | 24 | NR |
| 1994 | 5 | 29% | 14 | 13 | 18 | NR |
| 1993 | 11 | 65% | NR | 10 | 25 | 18 |
| 1992 | 7 | 41% | 18 | 11 | 19 | NR |
| 1991 | 10 | 63% | 24 | 19 | 25 | 19 |
| 1990 | 2 | 13% | 19 | 19 | 19 | NR |
| 1989 | 6 | 35% | 9 | 6 | 25 | NR |
| 1988 | 17 | 100% | 5 | 1 | 9 | 6 |
| 1987 | 16 | 100% | 3 | 3 | 13 | 9 |
| 1986 | 14 | 93% | 4 | 4 | 19 | 14 |
| 1985 | 15 | 88% | 20 | 7 | 20 | 7 |
| 1984 | 10 | 63% | 5 | 4 | 19 | 9 |
| 1983 | 2 | 13% | 20 | 17 | 20 | 17 |
| 1982 | 16 | 100% | 20 | 5 | 20 | 5 |
| 1981 | 10 | 67% | 13 | 6 | 19 | NR |
| 1980 | 13 | 81% | NR | 2 | 18 | 13 |
| 1979 | 2 | 13% | NR | 17 | 20 | NR |
| 1978 | 15 | 100% | 12 | 8 | 18 | 14 |
| 1977 | 5 | 36% | 11 | 11 | 20 | NR |
| 1976 | 14 | 100% | 17 | 2 | 17 | 15 |
| 1975 | 13 | 87% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 5 |
| 1974 | 4 | 27% | 12 | 12 | 18 | NR |
| 1973 | 15 | 100% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 12 |
| 1972 | 14 | 93% | NR | 6 | 15 | 15 |
| 1971 | 1 | 7% | 15 | 15 | 15 | NR |
| 1970 | 10 | 67% | 18 | 13 | 19 | NR |
| 1969 | 14 | 100% | 17 | 6 | 17 | 13 |
| 1968 | 4 | 29% | 16 | 8 | 16 | NR |
| 1967 | 11 | 92% | 8 | 1 | 8 | NR |
| 1966 | 13 | 100% | 4 | 2 | 8 | 5 |
| 1965 | 6 | 46% | NR | 4 | 8 | 4 |
| 1961 | 1 | 8% | NR | 9 | 9 | NR |
| 1960 | 8 | 67% | NR | 8 | 19 | NR |
| 1959 | 2 | 15% | NR | 17 | 20 | NR |
| 1957 | 2 | 17% | NR | 15 | 19 | NR |
| 1956 | 2 | 17% | 17 | 17 | 19 | NR |
| 1955 | 12 | 100% | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4 |
| 1954 | 12 | 100% | 8 | 1 | 8 | 2 |
| 1953 | 11 | 100% | 4 | 4 | 12 | 5 |
| 1952 | 11 | 100% | 18 | 3 | 18 | 6 |
| 1951 | 3 | 27% | NR | 15 | 18 | 17 |
| 1950 | 4 | 40% | NR | 13 | 19 | NR |
| 1949 | 3 | 33% | NA | 13 | 20 | NR |
| 1947 | 6 | 60% | NA | 16 | 19 | NR |
| 1946 | 9 | 100% | NA | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| 1945 | 1 | 11% | NA | 12 | 12 | NR |
| 1942 | 7 | 88% | NA | 10 | 18 | 13 |
| 1939 | 7 | 78% | NA | 7 | 19 | 7 |
*UCLA has been ranked in 66 out of 90 polls.
USC
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11 | 65% | NR | 16 | 25 | 20 |
| 2024 | 6 | 35% | 23 | 11 | 23 | NR |
| 2023 | 10 | 63% | 6 | 5 | 24 | NR |
| 2022 | 16 | 100% | 14 | 4 | 14 | 12 |
| 2021 | 2 | 13% | 15 | 14 | 15 | NR |
| 2020 | 13 | 76% | 17 | 13 | 25 | 21 |
| 2019 | 5 | 29% | NR | 21 | 25 | NR |
| 2018 | 3 | 19% | 15 | 15 | 22 | NR |
| 2017 | 16 | 100% | 4 | 4 | 21 | 12 |
| 2016 | 6 | 38% | 20 | 3 | 20 | 3 |
| 2015 | 8 | 50% | 8 | 6 | 24 | NR |
| 2014 | 11 | 65% | 15 | 9 | 24 | 20 |
| 2013 | 5 | 29% | 24 | 19 | 25 | 19 |
| 2012 | 12 | 75% | 1 | 1 | 21 | NR |
| 2011 | 10 | 63% | 25 | 5 | 25 | 6 |
| 2010 | 7 | 44% | 14 | 14 | 24 | NR |
| 2009 | 15 | 94% | 4 | 3 | 24 | 22 |
| 2008 | 17 | 100% | 3 | 1 | 9 | 3 |
| 2007 | 16 | 100% | 1 | 1 | 13 | 3 |
| 2006 | 16 | 100% | 6 | 2 | 9 | 4 |
| 2005 | 16 | 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 2004 | 16 | 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2003 | 17 | 100% | 8 | 1 | 10 | 1 |
| 2002 | 18 | 100% | 20 | 4 | 20 | 4 |
| 2000 | 7 | 41% | 15 | 8 | 18 | NR |
| 1999 | 6 | 35% | 19 | 16 | 22 | NR |
| 1998 | 5 | 31% | NR | 18 | 22 | NR |
| 1997 | 4 | 22% | 22 | 22 | 23 | NR |
| 1996 | 7 | 39% | 7 | 7 | 19 | NR |
| 1995 | 17 | 100% | 7 | 5 | 18 | 12 |
| 1994 | 14 | 82% | 17 | 13 | 25 | 13 |
| 1993 | 2 | 12% | 18 | 18 | 22 | NR |
| 1992 | 12 | 71% | NR | 11 | 23 | NR |
| 1991 | 3 | 19% | 16 | 16 | 22 | NR |
| 1990 | 16 | 100% | 9 | 5 | 23 | 20 |
| 1989 | 17 | 100% | 5 | 5 | 13 | 8 |
| 1988 | 17 | 100% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 7 |
| 1987 | 5 | 31% | 19 | 16 | 19 | 18 |
| 1986 | 9 | 60% | NR | 9 | 18 | NR |
| 1985 | 5 | 29% | 6 | 3 | 18 | NR |
| 1984 | 11 | 69% | NR | 7 | 20 | 10 |
| 1983 | 4 | 25% | 8 | 8 | 14 | NR |
| 1982 | 16 | 100% | 10 | 10 | 19 | 15 |
| 1981 | 15 | 100% | 5 | 1 | 14 | 14 |
| 1980 | 16 | 100% | 4 | 2 | 17 | 11 |
| 1979 | 15 | 100% | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| 1978 | 15 | 100% | 9 | 2 | 9 | 2 |
| 1977 | 12 | 86% | 4 | 1 | 20 | 13 |
| 1976 | 13 | 93% | 8 | 2 | 19 | 2 |
| 1975 | 12 | 80% | 5 | 3 | 17 | 17 |
| 1974 | 15 | 100% | 5 | 2 | 18 | 2 |
| 1973 | 15 | 100% | 1 | 1 | 9 | 8 |
| 1972 | 15 | 100% | 8 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
| 1971 | 9 | 60% | 5 | 5 | 20 | 20 |
| 1970 | 12 | 80% | 3 | 3 | 18 | 15 |
| 1969 | 14 | 100% | 5 | 3 | 7 | 3 |
| 1968 | 14 | 100% | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 1967 | 12 | 100% | 7 | 1 | 7 | 1 |
| 1966 | 11 | 85% | 9 | 5 | 10 | NR |
| 1965 | 11 | 85% | 7 | 4 | 10 | 10 |
| 1964 | 2 | 18% | NR | 2 | 10 | 10 |
| 1963 | 4 | 31% | 1 | 1 | 8 | NR |
| 1962 | 11 | 92% | NR | 1 | 9 | 1 |
| 1960 | 1 | 8% | 6 | 6 | 6 | NR |
| 1959 | 12 | 92% | NR | 4 | 14 | 14 |
| 1957 | 1 | 8% | 19 | 19 | 19 | NR |
| 1956 | 11 | 92% | 15 | 6 | 20 | 18 |
| 1955 | 9 | 75% | 13 | 9 | 16 | 13 |
| 1954 | 11 | 92% | 17 | 7 | 17 | 17 |
| 1953 | 10 | 91% | 8 | 7 | 20 | NR |
| 1952 | 11 | 100% | 16 | 2 | 16 | 5 |
| 1951 | 8 | 73% | NR | 6 | 20 | NR |
| 1950 | 1 | 10% | 12 | 12 | 12 | NR |
| 1949 | 6 | 67% | NA | 8 | 19 | NR |
| 1947 | 10 | 100% | NA | 3 | 20 | 8 |
| 1946 | 4 | 44% | NA | 10 | 16 | NR |
| 1945 | 5 | 56% | NA | 6 | 20 | 11 |
| 1944 | 7 | 78% | NA | 7 | 15 | 7 |
| 1943 | 6 | 67% | NA | 4 | 10 | NR |
| 1942 | 2 | 25% | NA | 14 | 16 | NR |
| 1940 | 2 | 25% | NA | 17 | 17 | NR |
| 1939 | 9 | 100% | NA | 1 | 8 | 3 |
| 1938 | 7 | 88% | NA | 7 | 19 | 7 |
| 1937 | 1 | 14% | NA | 11 | 11 | NR |
| 1936 | 4 | 57% | NA | 6 | 15 | NR |
*USC has been ranked in 85 out of 90 polls.
Utah
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12 | 71% | NR | 13 | 25 | 14 |
| 2024 | 7 | 41% | 12 | 10 | 18 | NR |
| 2023 | 12 | 75% | 14 | 10 | 18 | NR |
| 2022 | 16 | 100% | 7 | 7 | 20 | 10 |
| 2021 | 7 | 44% | 24 | 10 | 24 | 12 |
| 2020 | 1 | 6% | 22 | 22 | 22 | NR |
| 2019 | 17 | 100% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 16 |
| 2018 | 6 | 38% | NR | 16 | 23 | NR |
| 2017 | 3 | 19% | NR | 20 | 23 | NR |
| 2016 | 11 | 69% | NR | 11 | 24 | 23 |
| 2015 | 14 | 88% | NR | 3 | 24 | 17 |
| 2014 | 10 | 59% | NR | 18 | 25 | 21 |
| 2010 | 14 | 88% | NR | 6 | 25 | NR |
| 2009 | 12 | 75% | 19 | 16 | 24 | 18 |
| 2008 | 16 | 94% | NR | 2 | 22 | 2 |
| 2004 | 16 | 100% | 20 | 4 | 20 | 4 |
| 2003 | 3 | 18% | NR | 21 | 25 | 21 |
| 1996 | 4 | 22% | NR | 20 | 24 | NR |
| 1994 | 11 | 65% | NR | 9 | 25 | 10 |
| 1947 | 1 | 10% | NA | 18 | 18 | NR |
*Utah has been ranked in 20 out of 90 polls.
Utah State
| Season | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 6% | NR | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| 2018 | 5 | 31% | NR | 14 | 22 | 22 |
| 2012 | 4 | 25% | NR | 16 | 25 | 16 |
| 1961 | 1 | 8% | NR | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 1960 | 2 | 17% | NR | 18 | 19 | NR |
*Utah State has been ranked in 5 out of 90 polls.
Washington
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 | 6% | NR | 24 | 24 | NR |
| 2023 | 16 | 100% | 10 | 2 | 10 | 2 |
| 2022 | 9 | 56% | NR | 8 | 24 | 8 |
| 2021 | 1 | 6% | 20 | 20 | 20 | NR |
| 2020 | 1 | 6% | NR | 23 | 23 | NR |
| 2019 | 7 | 41% | 13 | 13 | 25 | NR |
| 2018 | 15 | 94% | 6 | 6 | 20 | 13 |
| 2017 | 16 | 100% | 8 | 5 | 16 | 16 |
| 2016 | 16 | 100% | 14 | 4 | 14 | 4 |
| 2014 | 1 | 6% | 25 | 25 | 25 | NR |
| 2013 | 8 | 47% | NR | 15 | 25 | 25 |
| 2012 | 1 | 6% | NR | 23 | 23 | NR |
| 2011 | 1 | 6% | NR | 22 | 22 | NR |
| 2009 | 1 | 6% | NR | 24 | 24 | NR |
| 2003 | 6 | 35% | 17 | 17 | 22 | NR |
| 2002 | 9 | 50% | 9 | 9 | 22 | NR |
| 2001 | 17 | 100% | 15 | 8 | 21 | 19 |
| 2000 | 17 | 100% | 13 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| 1999 | 1 | 6% | NR | 23 | 23 | NR |
| 1998 | 5 | 31% | 18 | 9 | 20 | NR |
| 1997 | 18 | 100% | 4 | 2 | 21 | 18 |
| 1996 | 14 | 78% | NR | 12 | 25 | 16 |
| 1995 | 16 | 94% | 24 | 15 | 24 | NR |
| 1994 | 13 | 76% | 23 | 9 | 25 | NR |
| 1993 | 11 | 65% | 12 | 12 | 25 | NR |
| 1992 | 17 | 100% | 2 | 1 | 11 | 11 |
| 1991 | 16 | 100% | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| 1990 | 16 | 100% | 20 | 2 | 22 | 5 |
| 1989 | 4 | 24% | NR | 11 | 23 | 23 |
| 1988 | 7 | 41% | NR | 16 | 20 | NR |
| 1987 | 5 | 31% | 13 | 10 | 18 | NR |
| 1986 | 15 | 100% | 16 | 6 | 18 | 18 |
| 1985 | 2 | 12% | 12 | 12 | 12 | NR |
| 1984 | 16 | 100% | 18 | 1 | 19 | 2 |
| 1983 | 12 | 75% | 18 | 9 | 20 | NR |
| 1982 | 16 | 100% | 2 | 1 | 13 | 7 |
| 1981 | 11 | 73% | 15 | 10 | 18 | 10 |
| 1980 | 10 | 63% | 20 | 13 | 20 | 16 |
| 1979 | 15 | 100% | 15 | 6 | 20 | 11 |
| 1978 | 5 | 33% | 11 | 11 | 20 | NR |
| 1977 | 4 | 29% | NR | 10 | 19 | 10 |
| 1972 | 8 | 53% | 9 | 9 | 18 | NR |
| 1971 | 10 | 67% | NR | 11 | 20 | 19 |
| 1970 | 1 | 7% | NR | 20 | 20 | NR |
| 1964 | 2 | 18% | 7 | 7 | 10 | NR |
| 1963 | 1 | 8% | 10 | 10 | 10 | NR |
| 1962 | 6 | 50% | 10 | 7 | 10 | NR |
| 1960 | 12 | 100% | 3 | 3 | 13 | 6 |
| 1959 | 8 | 62% | NR | 8 | 18 | 8 |
| 1955 | 4 | 33% | NR | 12 | 19 | NR |
| 1952 | 1 | 9% | NR | 17 | 17 | NR |
| 1951 | 3 | 27% | 8 | 8 | 20 | NR |
| 1950 | 8 | 80% | NR | 10 | 19 | 11 |
| 1945 | 2 | 22% | NA | 18 | 18 | NR |
| 1943 | 7 | 78% | NA | 11 | 19 | 12 |
| 1941 | 1 | 13% | NA | 20 | 20 | NR |
| 1940 | 8 | 100% | NA | 10 | 17 | 10 |
| 1937 | 1 | 14% | NA | 13 | 13 | NR |
| 1936 | 7 | 100% | NA | 4 | 10 | 5 |
*Washington has been ranked in 59 out of 90 polls.
Washington State
| Year | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4 | 24% | NR | 19 | 25 | NR |
| 2023 | 5 | 31% | NR | 13 | 23 | NR |
| 2019 | 4 | 24% | 23 | 19 | 23 | NR |
| 2018 | 9 | 56% | NR | 7 | 25 | 10 |
| 2017 | 15 | 94% | 24 | 8 | 25 | NR |
| 2016 | 4 | 25% | NR | 20 | 25 | NR |
| 2015 | 2 | 13% | NR | 20 | 24 | NR |
| 2006 | 1 | 6% | NR | 25 | 25 | NR |
| 2003 | 14 | 82% | NR | 6 | 24 | 9 |
| 2002 | 18 | 100% | 11 | 3 | 17 | 10 |
| 2001 | 10 | 59% | NR | 9 | 19 | 10 |
| 1997 | 14 | 78% | NR | 8 | 19 | 9 |
| 1994 | 13 | 76% | NR | 16 | 24 | 21 |
| 1993 | 1 | 6% | NR | 25 | 25 | NR |
| 1992 | 9 | 53% | NR | 13 | 25 | 15 |
| 1989 | 7 | 41% | NR | 15 | 23 | NR |
| 1988 | 6 | 35% | NR | 16 | 20 | 16 |
| 1981 | 7 | 47% | NR | 14 | 20 | NR |
| 1977 | 1 | 7% | NR | 15 | 15 | NR |
| 1972 | 5 | 33% | NR | 19 | 20 | 19 |
| 1958 | 1 | 8% | NR | 10 | 10 | NR |
| 1957 | 1 | 8% | NR | 19 | 19 | NR |
| 1952 | 1 | 9% | 15 | 15 | 15 | NR |
| 1951 | 7 | 64% | NR | 16 | 18 | 18 |
| 1942 | 5 | 63% | NA | 10 | 17 | 17 |
| 1941 | 1 | 13% | NA | 19 | 19 | 19 |
| 1940 | 1 | 13% | NA | 19 | 19 | NR |
| 1936 | 4 | 57% | NA | 14 | 20 | NR |
*Washington State has been ranked in 28 out of 90 polls.
Wyoming
| Season | App | Pct | Pre | High | Low | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 1 | 6% | NR | 25 | 25 | NR |
| 1996 | 12 | 67% | NR | 16 | 25 | 22 |
| 1993 | 2 | 12% | NR | 23 | 24 | NR |
| 1990 | 5 | 31% | NR | 18 | 25 | NR |
| 1988 | 11 | 65% | NR | 10 | 18 | NR |
| 1969 | 5 | 36% | NR | 15 | 19 | NR |
| 1968 | 4 | 29% | NR | 19 | 20 | NR |
| 1967 | 7 | 58% | NR | 6 | 10 | 6 |
| 1966 | 1 | 8% | NR | 10 | 10 | NR |
| 1959 | 2 | 15% | NR | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| 1956 | 1 | 8% | NR | 19 | 19 | NR |
| 1950 | 5 | 50% | NR | 12 | 18 | 12 |
*Wyoming has been ranked in 12 out of 90 polls.
Continue Reading
The cognitive boost from exercise can last until the following day according to a study by the
University College London (UCL), published in the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition
and Physical Activity.
Conor Benn has had his say on the claims that Regis Prograis is injured heading into their fight this weekend.
Benn and Prograis collide in a 150lb catchweight bout in the co-main event of the Tyson Fury vs. Arslanbek Makhmudov card at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in London.
It sees Benn back in action for the first time since his two fights with bitter rival Chris Eubank Jr in 2025. Eubank came out on top in the first meeting, but in the rematch Benn dropped his opponent on his way to a dominant unanimous decision win.
Those two contests took place at 160lbs, with Benn now planning to return to the welterweight division, starting with this catchweight bout against Prograis on Saturday.
Around a week ago, it was heavily rumoured that former super-lightweight world champion Prograis was ‘badly injured’ and would be forced to pull out of the fight, but instead the 37-year-old is proceeding with the showdown.
Benn has now spoken out about the matter, telling Boxing News that the outcome will be the same irrespective of the condition of Prograis.
“Whether he’s injured or not isn’t my problem….I ain’t bothered about if he’s injured or not. If he’s injured it’s not a smart move on his end. He’s getting paid a fortune. If he isn’t injured, it’s not going to make a difference regardless, the outcome will still be the same.”
This weekend’s card will be broadcast live on Netflix, and also includes a British heavyweight title fight between Jeamie TKV and Richard Riakporhe, and another heavyweight battle as Justis Huni meets Frazer Clarke.
Randy Orton’s rivalry with Cody Rhodes ahead of WWE WrestleMania 42 may get even more heated on the next episode of SmackDown.
Things have been heating up in WWE lately, which is expected considering the fact that WrestleMania 42 is just around the corner. Several storylines appear to be reaching their conclusion at The Showcase of The Immortals. One of the most anticipated climaxes of a rivalry is the one between Randy Orton and Cody Rhodes. Meanwhile, Pat McAfee was revealed to be the mystery man whom Orton was talking to on the phone in recent weeks. McAfee appeared on SmackDown last week and assisted The Viper in fending off an attack from Rhodes before revealing his alliance.
Thanks for the submission!
Interestingly, CM Punk recently fired shots at Pat McAfee in a pipebomb promo on RAW, while also targeting other names like Roman Reigns and even Vince McMahon. The involvement of Pat McAfee has clearly transcended brands. Furthermore, in a recent episode of The Pat McAfee Show, the veteran also noted that he had some things to say on the upcoming episode of SmackDown, confirming his appearance and teasing an escalation in the feud between Orton and Rhodes.
“Friday Night, live from San Jose, I think I got some things to say. I think we will have a good time there on SmackDown,” McAfee said.
Pat McAfee also fired back at CM Punk after WWE RAW
CM Punk’s promo on RAW also got a response from Pat McAfee in kind.
Taking to X/Twitter, McAfee noted that he had heard Punk’s pipebomb promo, calling him a Punk a** b**ch. He also claimed that Randy Orton was the saviour who was going to bring the pro wrestling scene back on track, listing his various achievements in WWE over the years.
With how things have been going so far, it appears that the match between Randy Orton and Cody Rhodes at WWE WrestleMania 42 will be one of the most intense matches in recent memory. For now, it remains to be seen what Pat McAfee has to add to the situation on the next episode of SmackDown.
If you use any quotes from this article, please credit the source and give an H/T to Sportskeeda Wrestling for the transcription.
Read all the hottest WWE news from Sportskeeda by choosing us as your preferred source. Click HERE.
Edited by Sayantan Niyogi
Sports
PSL team owner contradicts Mohsin Naqvi on empty stands, says Pakistan was ‘busy driving global peace’ | Cricket News
PSL team owner contradicts Mohsin Naqvi
NEW DELHI: The absence of crowds in Pakistan Super League (PSL) 2026 matches has sparked debate after Islamabad United owner Ali Naqvi offered an unusual explanation, linking it to Pakistan’s role in global diplomacy. His remarks suggested that empty stadiums were part of a larger national effort, though this version differs from what officials, including Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chairman Mohsin Naqvi, had earlier stated.
Ali Naqvi’s claim and reaction
In a post on X, Naqvi argued that Pakistan prioritised peace efforts over cricket entertainment, especially due to its involvement in ceasefire discussions.“Not hosting matches in Pindi makes complete sense — Islamabad was clearly the chosen venue for sensitive ceasefire discussions, and the unpredictable timing demanded absolute flexibility on logistics and security,” he added.He remarked that security resources were focused on bigger priorities, ading, “When forced to weigh entertainment against helping deliver global peace, I believe every Pakistani would have made the exact same call.”Naqvi also dismissed comparisons with other leagues, saying, “Also, comparisons with another league that has allowed fans, are simply not valid.”
Official version and criticism
However, this explanation clashes with the Pakistan Cricket Board’s earlier statement. PCB chairman Mohsin Naqvi had said the no-crowd policy was due to a fuel shortage limiting public movement.“The [Pakistan] Prime Minister [Shehbaz Sharif] has requested restricted movements of people because of the fuel crisis, so we have decided that the PSL would continue as per the original schedule but without crowds,” he had said.Critics argue that linking empty stadiums to global peace efforts stretches the narrative too far. What appears to be a practical issue, fuel shortages and logistics, has been reframed as a major diplomatic sacrifice.
Vaibhav Sooryavanshi (BCCI Photo)
NEW DELHI: Rajasthan Royals youngster Vaibhav Sooryavanshi is quickly making a name for himself in IPL 2026, especially after his fearless hitting against top bowlers like Jasprit Bumrah. In a recent match against Mumbai Indians, his aggressive batting helped RR secure a convincing win and extend their strong run in the tournament.
Steyn on Sooryavanshi’s fear factor
Former South Africa pacer Dale Steyn believes the young opener is already getting into bowlers’ heads. After Sooryavanshi smashed Bumrah for a six off the very first ball, Steyn said,“I think that’s what he’s done,” he told ESPNCricinfo. “I mean, honestly, he’s created and instilled the fear into bowlers that he’s going to hit you for boundaries.”He pointed out that even a world-class bowler like Bumrah looked under pressure, adding, “That delivery from Bumrah, that’s in the slot. That’s so rare of Bumrah. So even the great Bumrah is thinking in the back of his mind: ‘don’t get it wrong, because if I get it wrong, this guy’s going to hit me for six’.”Steyn explained that this fear can lead to mistakes: “I feel, if you think like that, more often than not, you do get it wrong.”
Fearless batting driving RR’s success
Steyn also highlighted that Sooryavanshi’s confidence makes him dangerous against any bowler.“And this kid’s not scared, man. If you miss a half-volley, he’s going to hit you out of the ground… It doesn’t matter who you are, Bumrah or Jofra Archer,” he added.In the match, Sooryavanshi scored a quick 39 off just 14 balls, while Yashasvi Jaiswal added an unbeaten 77. Their explosive start helped Rajasthan Royals beat Mumbai Indians by 27 runs, marking their third straight win of the season.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Minnesota’s high school softball season will be under a national spotlight for the second year in a row, and a hotter one than in 2025.
As the U.S. Department of Justice has launched a Title IX lawsuit against the state’s education agencies for letting biological male trans athletes play in girls’ sports, Champlin Park High School is set to be a political target.
The high school rosters a trans pitcher on its softball team, who emerged as a dominant force en route to a state championship last year.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM
Transgender pitcher Marissa Rothenberger. (Amber Harding)
Now, that pitcher is playing for Champlin Park again this year while President Donald Trump’s administration tries to crack down.
The Anoka-Hennepin School District, which oversees Champlin Park, is standing by the athlete amid the renewed national scrutiny.
“The Champlin Park Softball team will compete in compliance with Minnesota State High School League rules and applicable Minnesota law this upcoming season. All participating student-athletes will meet the criteria for eligibility which aim to elevate standards of sportsmanship and encourage the growth of responsible citizenship for all involved. Because the school district is named in an active lawsuit involving last season, the District is limited in what additional information can be shared on this matter,” the district said in a statement to Fox News Digital.
A girls’ softball player, who is anonymously part of a lawsuit with Alliance Defending Freedom that challenges the state laws on trans athletes, shared her thoughts on the distracting political dynamic of this season with Fox News Digital.
“I just want a fair and competitive season. My hope for this season is that the focus stays on the game, while also making sure girls’ sports remain a place where female athletes have equal opportunities to compete and succeed,” she said.
Meanwhile, another anonymous plaintiff in that lawsuit shared gratitude for the DOJ’s intervention.
“Thank you, President Trump! I’m so grateful for the support towards girls in sports in Minnesota,” she said.
The lawsuit was originally struck down by a federal judge, but ADF has filed an appeal in appellate court and is awaiting a decision there.
CHAMPLIN PARK WINS MINNESOTA SOFTBALL STATE TITLE BEHIND TRANS PITCHER’S COMPLETE GAME SHUTOUT
Former Minnesota high school and current NCAA softball player Kendall Kotzmacher lost a 3-2 heartbreaker to Champlin Park last season, in what was her final high school game.
But Kozmacher’s younger sister, who lost with her in that game, is still set to play this season, and could be on a collision course with the trans pitcher again.
“My little sister, she played with me last year. She’s still playing, so it’s really hard,” Kotzmacher said. “I’m lucky enough that it’s not allowed at the NCAA level. But there’s all of these girls that I do not want them to ever have to go through the situations that I did, and I do not want my sister to have to deal with what I had to do and what she had to deal with last year again.”
Minnesota has faced its own internal conflict over the issue dating back to early 2025, when Democratic lawmakers in the state legislature struck down a bill that would have prevented biological males from competing in girls’ sports.
State Republicans renewed that effort in recent weeks amid the DOJ crackdown, but were once again unsuccessful due to Democrat control, as they failed to push a bill forward on the House Floor Tuesday.
“Protecting girls is not hate,” said state representative Krista Knudsen. “When biological males enter girls’ sports, girls lose. They lose medals, they lose roster spots, they lose college scholarships and they lose their safety.”
Democrat state representative Kelly Moller dismissed concerns over the issue.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“My colleagues across the aisle say that you are bringing this to protect women and girls and that couldn’t be further from the truth. The real threat to women and girls is sexual assault and gender-based violence,” Moller said.
Meanwhile, 326 school board members in 125 school districts in the state signed a letter pleading with the state’s leadership to comply with Trump’s mandate to protect girls’ sports.
Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
The Minnesota Vikings booted two starting defensive tackles from their roster this offseason, and that’s usually something a franchise does before drafting a rookie replacement. So when Clemson’s Peter Woods found his way back into the Vikings’ mock-draft orbit this week, well, it made sense.
Minnesota still needs interior defensive line help, and Peter Woods keeps surfacing as a logical first-round fit.
Pete Prisco did the honors, giving Minnesota a rest from the nonstop Dillon Thieneman mock-draft takes.
Woods Checks Some Boxes for Minnesota at a DT Need
Yes, the Vikings need a defensive tackle.
Pete Prisco: Peter Woods to Min at 18
Two weeks remaining before the 2026 NFL Draft, and if Prisco has it right, Woods will be a Viking. He wrote this week in a just-published mock draft, “The interior of their defensive line needs a boost after they let go of Jonathan Allen and Javon Hargrave. Woods was dominant in 2024, but his play tailed off some last year. The talent is there.”
Most mock drafts expect Minnesota to pick a safety in Round 1, either the aforementioned Thieneman from Oregon or Toledo’s Emmanuel McNeil-Warren.
Some others believe Minnesota could select a cornerback like Avieon Terrell (Clemson) or Jermod McCoy (Tennessee).
The Bio for Woods
Woods is 6’2″ and 300 pounds. He runs a 4.75 forty — pretty fantastic for a defensive tackle — and is known for his first-step explosion and flexibility. His swipe move is also impressive, and on the whole, he’s a freak athlete for DT standards. Woods banked 5 sacks in the last two seasons at Clemson.
The Athletic‘s Dane Brugler on Woods: “Woods flashes the ability to win with quickness, strength and hand usage — and the next step in his development is for him to do so more consistently. He offers scheme diversity, although he projects best as a three-/4i-technique DT.”
“A two-and-a-half-year starter at Clemson, Woods shuffled up and down the line in defensive coordinator Tom Allen’s four-man front. After earning Freshman All-American honors in 2023, he received All-ACC honors in each of the last two seasons.”
Woods is also young; he just turned 21.
Brugler added, “He was tabbed as a potential top-five draft pick entering his junior season, but he struggled to match that hype in 2025, posting up-and-down tape and poor production (14 pressures, 3.5 tackles for loss and two sacks over 12 games). Draft projections for Woods will depend on a team’s willingness to grade to his flashes.”
“He moves with big-man twitch and has the foot quickness to elude blocks in tight quarters. However, for a player with his explosive traits, he doesn’t have many quick wins on his tape and needs to learn how to diversify his rush approach.”
Vikings’ DT Setup for 2026
It’s not breaking news, but it’s unfinished business: the Vikings need a defensive tackle. The franchise parted ways with two starters last month, cutting Jonathan Allen and Javon Hargrave, a pair that played over 1,300 snaps in Brian Flores’s 2025 defense.
Without Woods, a different rookie, or a free agent like Christian Wilkins or D.J. Reader, Minnesota would roll into 2026 with this interior defensive line group:
- Jalen Redmond
- Levi Drake Rodriguez
- Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins
- Elijah Williams
- Taki Taimani
- Jaylon Hutchings
That might work; it might not. The DT unit is one Redmond injury away from disaster. Therefore, an extra defensive tackle is probably on the way.
Other Draft DT Options
It’s a safe bet to assume the Vikings leave the draft with a defensive tackle; it’s just unclear if Woods will be the guy. If not, these are the DT options before the end of Round 4, according to the Consensus Big Board in early April:
- Kayden McDonald (Ohio State)
- Caleb Banks (Florida)
- Lee Hunter (Texas Tech)
- Christen Miller (Georgia)
- Domonique Orange (Iowa State)
- Gracen Halton (Oklahoma)
- Darrell Jackson Jr. (Florida State)
- Kaleb Proctor (Southeastern Louisiana)
- Chris McClellan (Missouri)
- Dontay Corleone (Cincinnati)
- Xzavian Harris (Mississippi)
- Rayshaun Benny (Michigan)
- Zane Durant (Penn State)
Vikings fans have taken a shine to Hunter from Texas Tech because he should be available at Minnesota’s 49th pick, and he’s huge at over 330 pounds, known for stopping the run as a true-blue nose tackle.
Brugler noted on Hunter: “Hunter doesn’t have the pass-rush skill set to consistently impact the quarterback, but he is instinctive as a run defender and has heavy hands to make stops at the line of scrimmage. He projects as a scheme-diverse, two-gapping nose.”
The Vikings have drafted three players from Clemson in the last decade: safety Jayron Kearse, cornerback Mackensie Alexander, and cornerback Andrew Booth. So, too, did elite DT Dexter Lawrence, a trade candidate, go to Clemson. Maybe a Woods/Lawrence twosome materializes at some point.
Neeraj Chopra (PTI Photo)
BENGALURU: As the Athletics Federation of India on Wednesday reiterated its stand that athletes should mandatorily obtain its approval before entering into an agreement with a third party and that the decision is to protect the athletes, legal experts slammed the federation’s move as “unconstitutional and arbitrary.”“This is akin to mandatorily seeking a blanket prior approval, which is wholly unconstitutional and arbitrary besides being an unreasonable and unlawful restraint on athletes’ commercial freedom as also his/her trade or profession. It thus seems to be violative of Article 19(1)(g) (Freedom of Trade or Profession) of the Constitution of India,” sports lawyer Rahul Mehra told TOI.“Instead, AFI could have issued advisory guidelines in order to protect the athletes from entering into conflicting or harmful contracts, but to have such a mandatory prior approval is reflective of seeking absolute control over athletes’ commercial right and interest,” he added.Critics pointed out that the AFI move could also be aimed at protecting their sponsors. “The new circular seems to have been triggered by long-distance runner Gulveer Singh moving out of Reliance (one of AFI’s sponsors) to OGQ to JSW within three months. AFI can support their sponsor but that should not be done by troubling the athletes who are getting individual sponsors,” another legal expert said.Experts also wondered why the AFI should trouble India’s top athletes like Neeraj Chopra, asking them to get approval for getting a sponsorship deal. “The value of athletics in India is because of Chopra. It’s an attempt to exert some form of control. There is no chance (that it will stand scrutiny in court) as it’s a restraint of trade,” an expert told TOI.“In 2007, after India lost in the World Cup, the BCCI wanted to control the number of endorsements of the players. A few years back, the NRAI (the national shooting federation) wanted to do the same thing and failed. The AFI’s move is more like a public statement to assert control. It’s completely not enforceable legally and practically, and none of these athletes are in any form of contract with the AFI. This move will be like a new basis to knock off someone. Earlier, they said if you don’t attend national camp they will drop you. Likewise, if you don’t report your endorsements we can drop you,” he explained.Meanwhile, the AFI said the whole idea is to help the athletes. “This considered decision has come in the wake of some sponsors drawing AFI’s attention. We would like the athletes to focus on their training and competition rather than get caught up in signing contracts,” AFI said in a post on X.“At AFI, we are mindful of athletes’ welfare and do not want to come in the way of their making money through endorsement deals. However, we will protect the interests of the athletes and Indian athletics. AFI believes that athletes affect (sic) such changes without understanding the implications of terminating the contracts they have signed with sponsors,” the federation’s post added.“While asking for prior approval of contracts and agreements, AFI is ensuring that its legal team is on hand to advise the athletes against potential pitfalls. AFI makes it clear that, in providing such services to the athletes, it does not charge a penny from either the athletes or the sponsors,” the AFI said.
Charles Bassey is already making an impact just days after joining the Golden State Warriors.
The Nigerian center recently signed with the Warriors to help cover injuries in the squad, and he wasted no time showing what he can do.
In just his second appearance, Bassey delivered 14 points and 12 rebounds in a win over the Sacramento Kings, immediately stepping up when the team needed it.
Before this move, Bassey had been putting up serious numbers in the G League with Santa Cruz, averaging over 20 points, 11 rebounds, and 2 blocks per game, which earned him another NBA opportunity.
At 6’10, the 25-year-old brings energy and rebounding to the game. Warriors coach Steve Kerr has already praised his effort and athleticism, pointing to his ability to contribute in short bursts.
Bassey was drafted in 2021 and has had spells across the league, but this opportunity with the Golden State Warriors comes at the right time.
He has already shown what he can do.
A 14-point, 12-rebound performance this early is a good statement.
The Diamond League athletics meeting in Doha has been postponed for six weeks and will now take place on June 19 due to the war in the Middle East, organisers announced Wednesday. The United States and Iran agreed on Tuesday a two-week ceasefire to the war that has killed thousands and hammered the global economy. The Diamond League organisers had previously said the opening leg of this year’s series would go ahead as planned on May 8, but have now decided to delay the event.
“In the interests of athlete and spectator safety, a decision has now been taken to postpone the meeting. Should conditions allow, it will now be held on June 19,” they said in a statement.
The competition will also be moved from the Qatar Sports Club to the Khalifa International Stadium in case of higher temperatures.
The Khalifa stadium, which is temperature controlled, hosted the world athletics championships in 2019 and matches of the 2022 FIFA World Cup.
The Diamond League is the elite one-day meeting series in track and field, a season that features 15 meets in 13 different countries across four different continents.
The first Diamond League meeting will instead be in Shanghai on May 16.
Several major sporting events in the Middle East have been postponed or cancelled because of the war the United States and Israel launched on Iran, including the Formula One grands prix in Bahrain and Jeddah, in Saudi Arabia.
Both were scheduled for mid-April and have been cancelled.
In football, the Finalissima, which was to pit European champions Spain against Copa America winners Argentina on March 27 in Qatar, was called off.
The Qatar motorcycling Grand Prix, initially scheduled for the weekend of April 12, has been postponed to November 8, while a gymnastics World Cup event scheduled to take place in Doha in April was also cancelled.
However, a horse racing meeting in Dubai, carrying prize money of $30.5 million and featuring the Dubai World Cup, did go ahead on March 28.
(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Featured Video Of The Day
IPL 2026 News | RCB Outplay CSK For 2nd Win On Trot, Ruturaj Gaikwad & Co Suffer 3rd Loss
Topics mentioned in this article
Business37 seconds ago
‘Urban park’ at Liverpool city centre office scheme will need public sector support
Crypto World2 minutes ago
Deposit Flight Concerns Over Stablecoin Yield Are ‘Quantitatively Small’: White House Report
Entertainment3 minutes ago
Amanda Seyfried is set to voice a major princess — but not for a Disney movie
-
NewsBeat6 days agoSteven Gerrard disagrees with Gary Neville over ‘shock’ Chelsea and Arsenal claim | Football
-
Business6 days agoNo Jackpot Winner and $194 Million Prize Rolls Over
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Spanx – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World7 days agoGold Price Prediction: Worst Month in 17 Years fo Save Haven Rock
-
Business5 days agoExpert Picks for Every Need
-
Business3 days agoThree Gulf funds agree to back Paramount’s $81 billion takeover of Warner, WSJ reports
-
Sports4 days agoIndia men’s 4x400m and mixed 4x100m relay teams register big progress | Other Sports News
-
Business7 days agoLogin and Checkout Issues Spark Merchant Frustration
-
Tech22 hours agoHow Long Can You Drive With Expired Registration? What Florida Law Says
-
Business3 days ago
No Jackpot Winner, Prize to Climb to $231 Million
-
Tech6 days agoCommonwealth Fusion Systems leans on magnets for near-term revenue
-
Fashion2 days agoMassimo Dutti Offers Inspiration for Your Summer Mood Board
-
Crypto World7 days agoRipple rolls out enterprise crypto treasury platform for corporates
-
Fashion1 day agoLet’s Discuss: DEI in 2026
-
Politics5 days ago
Wings Over Scotland | The quality of mercy
-
Sports7 days agoSteal Gary Woodland’s subtle power move for longer drives
-
Business4 days agoAkebia Therapeutics, Inc. (AKBA) Discusses Pipeline Progress and Strategic Focus on Kidney Disease Treatments at R&D Day – Slideshow
-
Sports7 days ago
Tom Pelissero Drives the Final Nail in the Coffin
-
Tech7 days agoBattery Tester Outperforms Cheaper Options
-
Tech7 days agoFollowing Artemis II’s Journey Around The Moon
You must be logged in to post a comment Login