While listening to a record with my youngest daughter the other day, the conversation turned to why anyone still listens to vinyl when streaming is “clearly so much better.” As a committed Lana Del Rey fan, she then explained that the long and somewhat operatic wait for Stove is apparently proof that records still matter, because vinyl takes months to press and Lana is not going to rush the thing merely because the rest of us have jobs and limited attention spans.
This was followed by a pointed discussion of the price of concerts, which was less philosophical.
Living at the Shore has its advantages. PNC Bank Arts Center, the Count Basie Center, and Asbury Park are all close enough that a good show can become a family night without requiring a hotel, airport security, or a second mortgage. That does not mean every artist announcement is an automatic yes. A Lana Del Rey tour, should one arrive anywhere within reasonable driving distance, would almost certainly trigger negotiations normally reserved for hostage situations.
There are limits. Even in a household with multiple turntables, more records than shelf space, and a somewhat elastic definition of “necessary.”
Advertisement
“Do you know who invented the turntable?” I asked as she wandered around the den holding the jacket for Craft Recordings and Bluesville’s recent reissue of Albert King’s I’ll Play the Blues for You.
“Not Taylor Swift.”
“That would be correct.”
“My teacher told us that it was Thomas Edison. Or maybe Billy Madison. I’m confused.”
Advertisement
TikTok needs to be banned.
“Thomas Edison did not invent the turntable. Edison did make significant contributions to sound recording and playback, including the invention of the phonograph, but he did not invent the turntable as we understand it today.”
“Edison’s phonograph, patented in 1878, was a mechanical device that used a rotating cylinder covered in tinfoil to record and reproduce sound. It had a hand-cranked mechanism to rotate the cylinder, and a stylus traced the grooves on the cylinder, producing sound vibrations that were amplified by a horn.”
Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
“The turntable, on the other hand, refers to the rotating platform on which vinyl records are played.”
“So how do you know it wasn’t Taylor Swift?”
“Have you ever heard of Emile Berliner?”
Advertisement
“Is he on TikTok or YouTube?”
Emile Berliner
Emile Berliner (1851-1929) was a German-born inventor, engineer, and entrepreneur who made significant contributions to the fields of sound recording and communication. He is best known for his invention of the gramophone, a device that played flat disc records.
Born on May 20, 1851, in Hanover, Germany, Berliner immigrated to the United States in 1870. He initially worked as a merchant and bookbinder but soon turned his attention to inventing. In 1887, Berliner developed a new method of sound reproduction, which he named the gramophone.
Advertisement
Emile Berliner
Berliner’s gramophone used flat disc records made of a zinc disc coated with a compound called shellac. The records had spiral grooves that were created by a cutting stylus. The sound vibrations from the stylus were transmitted through a diaphragm and a horn, resulting in amplified sound. The gramophone offered several advantages over Edison’s cylinder-based phonograph, including easier production, longer playing time, and the ability to mass-produce records.
In addition to the gramophone, Berliner also made notable contributions to the development of the microphone and telephone technologies. He invented the carbon microphone, which became widely used in telephony and early sound recording. Berliner’s improvements to the telephone transmitter greatly enhanced its performance and efficiency.
Berliner was also an astute businessman and established the Berliner Gramophone Company in 1895. The company later merged with the Victor Talking Machine Company, forming the Victor Talking Machine Company, which became a major player in the phonograph industry.
Emile Berliner held numerous patents throughout his career and made significant advancements in sound recording and communication technologies. His invention of the gramophone and disc records laid the foundation for modern turntables and the widespread consumption of recorded music. Berliner’s contributions to the field of audio technology continue to influence the way we enjoy and experience music today.
The Most Significant Turntables
Do you remember your first turntable?
Advertisement
I inherited a Thorens TD-145 from my parents in 1983 as part of my Bar Mitzvah gift and it gave me over a decade of service before I upgraded to an Audiomeca Romance table designed by Pierre Lurne of Goldmund.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Looking back I’m not entirely convinced that it was an upgrade but I did trade it in when I purchased a Michell Orbe SE in 1998; that table absolutely was a significant improvement and a great platform for a Wilson Benesch ACT 0.5 Tonearm and Benz Micro H2.0 high-output cartridge.
My ex-wife forced me to sell it during our rather quick and bloody divorce and it was painful to let that one go. I have never owned anything better and it’s unlikely that I would ever spend that kind of money on a turntable and cartridge again; especially not with college and private school tuition.
Advertisement
Three restored Thorens tables create wonderful music at home now and I’m not entirely sure that changing them would make a lot of sense. I also own a Yamaha YP-701 and NAD C 588.
Listening to records with my daughter sparked a different kind of conversation with some of our staff and my circle of audiophile friends.
Which tables were truly significant? We’ve included some tables from the late 1900s and the first part of the 20th century because they were indeed, very significant.
We could easily publish a list of the “best” turntables available right now but 99% of the planet could never afford them and will never have the opportunity to listen to one. This feels like a more interesting discussion.
Advertisement
What are we missing from this list? Please let us know.
Edison Phonograph
Edison Phonograph
Thomas Edison’s 1877 phonograph was not a turntable in the modern sense, but it was the first practical machine designed to both record sound and play it back. Built at his Menlo Park laboratory in New Jersey, the original device used a hand-cranked cylinder wrapped in tinfoil, rather than the wax cylinders that arrived later. A diaphragm and stylus translated sound into physical indentations in the foil; reversing the process allowed the machine to reproduce those vibrations as audible sound.
It was crude, fragile, and hardly hi-fi, but Edison’s invention established the essential idea that recorded music and speech could be captured, stored, and replayed at will. The flat disc record and the turntable would come later, but the phonograph was where the whole strange, expensive, shelf-consuming affair began.
Victor Talking Machine
Victor Talking Machine
Introduced by the Victor Talking Machine Company in 1906, the Victor Victrola was not the first disc phonograph, but it helped turn one into a desirable piece of furniture rather than an awkward mechanical contraption parked in the parlor. Its spring-wound motor rotated flat shellac discs without electricity, while the key innovation was the horn: Victor concealed it inside a handsome wooden cabinet instead of leaving a large external horn perched on top. That made the machine easier to live with and far more socially acceptable in the increasingly style-conscious American home.
Advertisement
The Victrola became one of the defining music machines of the early 20th century, and the company’s Nipper “His Master’s Voice” trademark became one of the most recognizable images in recorded sound. It was not high fidelity by any modern definition, but it brought the disc record, the home playback system, and the idea of owning music into the mainstream long before anyone argued about Bluetooth codecs or whether the pressing was “AAA.”
Philips 212 Electronic
Philips 22GA212 Electronic
Introduced in the early 1970s, the Philips 22GA212 Electronic was one of the more distinctive belt-drive turntables of its era. Its appeal was not that Philips had somehow invented electronic speed control, but that it combined a tacho-generator-regulated DC motor, floating subchassis, touch-sensitive 33, 45, and stop controls, and photo-electronic automatic shutoff in a relatively affordable domestic turntable.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
The 212 used feedback from its tacho generator to help maintain speed under changing load, while separate fine-speed controls and a stroboscopic platter ring allowed owners to make small adjustments. Philips claimed low wow and flutter, low rumble, and stable operation; the important point is that the deck tried to bring electronic control and convenience to a traditional suspended belt-drive design without making it look like laboratory equipment. The illuminated touch buttons were gloriously early 1970s, and remain one of the reasons the 212 has developed something of a cult following.
Advertisement
Garrard Model 301
Garrard 301
Launched in 1954, the Garrard 301 did not invent idler-wheel drive. That basic arrangement, in which a small rubber wheel transfers power from the motor to the platter’s inner rim, had already appeared in earlier phonographs and record changers. What Garrard did was apply the system to a serious transcription motor unit built for broadcasters, studios, and the growing number of home listeners who wanted something more substantial than a changer with a chrome arm and optimistic specifications.
The 301 used a powerful four-pole induction motor, a heavy platter, and an idler-drive system that delivered quick start-up, strong torque, and stable speed at 33⅓, 45, and 78 rpm. It was usually sold without a plinth, tonearm, or cartridge, allowing owners to build a system around it rather than accept a complete package chosen by someone in a sales office. The result was one of the first truly iconic high-fidelity turntables: industrial, durable, endlessly restorable, and still capable of sounding superb when properly rebuilt. A neglected example can be noisy and temperamental; a well-sorted one explains why the 301 has never really left the conversation.
Acoustic Research XA
Acoustic Research XA
Introduced in 1961, the AR XA was only $58 and what made it unique was how it handled vibration and how low its rumble measured. The package did not come with a cartridge but the price included the table, tonearm, stylus gauge, and dustcover.
The most interesting aspect of the design was its mounting system; Edgar Villchur realized that instead of attaching the motor, tonearm, and lightweight platter to the table’s top plate, it made more sense to mount the platter and tonearm to a sub platform which was suspended underneath the top plate at 3 very distinct points with damped springs with a low resonant frequency.
By doing so, the tonearm and record were isolated from footfalls and other acoustic vibration. Thorens and Linn would incorporate these concepts into their future tables.
Advertisement
Thorens TD-150
Thorens TD-150
Introduced in 1965, the Thorens TD 150 was a compact and rather unflashy turntable that changed the direction of serious belt-drive design. It was not the first commercially viable suspended-subchassis deck; that distinction belongs to the Acoustic Research AR XA of 1961. But Thorens took the basic idea of isolating the platter and tonearm from the motor and plinth with a three-point spring suspension, paired it with a belt-driven inner platter, and turned it into something more refined, more adaptable, and considerably more influential.
The TD 150 was also Thorens’ first true belt-drive turntable, replacing the belt-and-idler arrangement of the earlier TD 124 with a cleaner and more modern engineering approach. Its suspended subchassis helped reduce the transmission of motor vibration and external disturbance to the cartridge, while its removable armboard made it possible to fit alternative tonearms rather than live forever with the factory choice. That combination became the blueprint for a long line of Thorens models and, more importantly, helped inspire the Linn Sondek LP12 and much of the suspended-chassis cult that followed. Small, slightly wobbly when improperly set up, and far more important than it first appears, the TD 150 was one of the key turntables of the modern hi-fi era.
Thorens TD-124
Thorens TD-124
Introduced in 1957, the Thorens TD 124 was one of the great transcription turntables of the postwar hi-fi era: overbuilt, mechanically ingenious, and aimed at studios, broadcasters, and serious home listeners rather than anyone looking for a tidy all-in-one record player. Its most unusual feature was not a conventional idler drive, but a hybrid belt-and-idler system. A compliant belt linked the motor to a separate stepped pulley, which then drove the platter through an idler wheel. Thorens designed the arrangement to retain the torque and rapid start-up of idler drive while reducing the motor-borne vibration that could otherwise work its way toward the cartridge.
The TD 124 also used a substantial two-piece platter with a removable aluminum top section and a heavy main platter beneath, along with variable pitch adjustment, four speeds including 78 rpm, and interchangeable armboards for owners who wanted to fit their preferred tonearm. It was not a suspended-subchassis design; that came later with the TD 150. Instead, the TD 124’s reputation rests on its precision engineering, flexibility, and sheer durability. Properly restored and mounted in a serious plinth, it remains one of the most compelling vintage turntables ever made, with enough torque and authority to make many modern decks seem slightly apologetic.
The Technics SP-10 is the first direct-drive turntable.
Technics SP-10
Introduced in 1970, the Technics SP 10 was the first commercially available turntable to use a direct-drive motor, and it changed the industry almost immediately. Rather than relying on a belt or idler wheel to transfer power from the motor to the platter, the SP 10 placed the motor directly beneath the platter itself. That eliminated an entire chain of mechanical compromises and delivered unusually quick start-up, very low wow and flutter, and the kind of speed stability that broadcasters and mastering engineers could trust without keeping one eye on the strobe.
Advertisement
The original SP 10 was sold as a motor unit, leaving broadcasters, studios, and ambitious home listeners to supply the plinth, tonearm, and cartridge. It was built for work, not Instagram, and its plain industrial appearance gave little indication of how important it would become. The SP 10 helped establish direct drive as a serious alternative to belt and idler systems, and its successors became fixtures in radio stations and professional installations around the world. The SL 1200 may have become the cultural icon, but the SP 10 was the machine that opened the door and made precision direct drive impossible to dismiss.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Linn LP12
Linn LP12
Introduced in 1973, the Linn Sondek LP12 became one of the most influential turntables in high-end audio, not because it invented the suspended belt-drive turntable, but because it turned that established idea into a long-running argument about where sound quality actually begins. Its three-point suspended subchassis, belt-driven inner platter, single-point bearing, and separate armboard followed principles already explored by Acoustic Research, Thorens, and Ariston. Linn’s contribution was to refine the formula, make it modular, and insist that the source component mattered more than the hi-fi industry had previously been willing to admit.
That “source first” philosophy became the LP12’s real legacy. Ivor Tiefenbrun and Linn persuaded a generation of dealers and listeners that a better turntable could extract more musical information from the record before the signal ever reached the amplifier or loudspeakers. The LP12 also became famously upgradeable, with improved bearings, subchassis designs, power supplies, tonearms, and cartridges allowing owners to keep updating the same basic deck over decades. It was expensive, fussy about setup, and capable of developing a bounce that could make a wooden floor feel like an enemy combatant, but it became a benchmark for musical timing, long-term ownership, and the modern high-end turntable market.
Technics SL-1200
Technics SL-1200
Released in 1972, the Technics SL 1200 began as a serious consumer direct-drive turntable, not as a purpose-built DJ tool. Its high-torque motor, heavy platter, die-cast chassis, stroboscope, and fine-speed adjustment gave it fast start-up and strong speed stability, qualities that quickly caught the attention of club DJs looking for a deck that could cue records precisely and survive a room full of bass, smoke, and people making bad decisions.
Advertisement
The version that truly changed music culture, however, was the SL 1200MK2 in 1979. Technics redesigned it with input from disco DJs, adding quartz-locked speed control, a more robust chassis and damping system, improved torque, and the familiar ±8 percent pitch slider that made beatmatching practical and repeatable. The MK2 became the working standard for clubs, radio stations, hip-hop DJs, and turntablists around the world. The original SL 1200 opened the door; the MK2 turned the turntable from a playback device into an instrument. It was rugged, precise, and so durable that many examples have outlived the clubs, DJs, and questionable carpet they were originally purchased to endure.
Rega Planar 3
Rega Planar 3
Arriving in the late 1970s, the Rega Planar 3 became one of the defining affordable audiophile turntables because it refused to confuse complexity with progress. Its formula was almost aggressively simple: a light, rigid plinth, belt drive, 12 mm glass platter, straightforward manual operation, and a tonearm designed to do its job without adding a small engineering department’s worth of unnecessary parts. In an era when many manufacturers were loading decks with controls, mechanisms, and enough brushed aluminum to open a minor space program, Rega focused on keeping energy where it belonged: in the record and cartridge.
The original Planar 3 was developed from Rega’s earlier Planet and Planar 2 designs, and later versions benefited enormously from the company’s RB300 tonearm, introduced in 1983. Rega has refined the platform repeatedly through the P3, P3 24, RP3, and current Planar 3 generations, but the core philosophy has remained remarkably stubborn: low mass, high rigidity, sensible engineering, and sound quality that does not require a second mortgage or a plinth the size of a dining table. It helped make serious vinyl playback attainable for a far broader audience and remains one of the few turntables that can reasonably claim to be both an entry point and a lifelong habit.
Dual 1219
Dual 1219
Introduced in 1969, the Dual 1219 was not the first automatic turntable, but it proved that convenience and serious record playback could coexist. Its idler-drive system, substantial platter, 33, 45, and 78 rpm capability, and gimbal-bearing tonearm gave it genuine hi-fi credentials, while its automatic mechanism could start a record, return the arm, and shut the machine down at the end of play.
It could be used for single records or as a changer for a stack of discs. Complex, sturdy, and very German, the 1219 remains proof that an automatic turntable did not have to sound like furniture with a motor.
Advertisement
Pro-Ject Debut Carbon
Pro-Ject Debut Carbon
Introduced in 2012, the Pro Ject Debut Carbon became one of the defining entry-level audiophile turntables of the vinyl revival. It did not invent the affordable belt-drive deck, and it was not the first Pro Ject Debut; that model had been around since 1999. What the Debut Carbon did was add a one-piece carbon-fiber tonearm to an already proven, sensibly priced platform, giving buyers a feature normally associated with considerably more expensive turntables.
Manual operation, belt drive, a steel platter, and a pre-fitted Ortofon 2M Red cartridge kept the formula straightforward. The Debut Carbon was never designed to impress people who enjoy polishing machined aluminum for sport. It offered an honest route into proper vinyl playback at a price that did not require the sale of a kidney or a second listening room. For a generation of listeners moving beyond suitcase players and all-in-one systems, it became a legitimate gateway to better analog sound.
Goldmund Studio
Introduced in 1979, the Goldmund Studio helped define the modern high-end turntable as something more ambitious than a conventional record player on a well-made plinth. Goldmund combined direct drive, an acrylic platter, and its “Mechanical Grounding” approach, which focused on controlling and draining unwanted vibration through a rigid mechanical structure rather than simply trying to isolate everything from everything else.
The Studio was often paired with Goldmund’s servo-controlled T3 tonearm, and the combination looked unlike almost anything else on the market. It was expensive, unconventional, and not especially interested in winning over people who believed a turntable should resemble furniture. Its importance lies in how it pushed analog playback toward the modern cost-no-object era, where materials science, vibration control, industrial design, and tonearm geometry became part of the same rather elaborate argument.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Transcriptors Hydraulic Reference
Introduced in 1964, David Gammon’s Transcriptors Hydraulic Reference was one of the most visually radical turntables ever made. This was a manual belt-drive design with a synchronous AC motor, a machined aluminum platter, and six conspicuous gold-plated brass inertia weights that made the whole thing look less like a domestic appliance than a piece of kinetic sculpture from a very well-funded Bond villain’s living room.
The “Hydraulic” name came from its unusual speed-control system: a vane interacted with silicone fluid in a well beneath the platter to provide fine regulation. The exposed acrylic, aluminum, and brass construction made the mechanism part of the experience rather than something to hide under a wood veneer. Its engineering was genuinely inventive, but its broader importance was cultural and aesthetic. The Hydraulic Reference appears in A Clockwork Orange, and a 1964 example sits in MoMA’s Architecture and Design collection. It did not create a dominant turntable template in the way the Thorens TD 150 or Technics SL 1200 did, but it permanently expanded the idea of what a record player could look like.
Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson kicks off the Washington Space Council, surrounded by the council’s members and 10-year-old Sebastian Yu. (GeekWire Photo / Alan Boyle)
Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson has created a public-private council to elevate the Evergreen State’s profile as regional clusters compete for primacy in America’s space industry.
The 23-member Washington Space Council was introduced tonight at the Museum of Flight during a kickoff event for Seattle Space Week, a celebration organized by Space Northwest.
“The council will help keep us competitive by comparing Washington with other leading states in the industry and identifying ways we can continue to improve and compete,” Ferguson said.
Washington state already ranks as one of the nation’s space industry hotspots. “We’re proud to have a cluster of more than 90 space companies employing more than 13,000 workers, generating over $4 billion in annual economic activity and $1.6 billion in annual payroll,” Ferguson said.
But Andy Lapsa, co-founder and CEO of Kent, Wash.-based Stoke Space, told tonight’s crowd that several other regions are competing with the Pacific Northwest for space-related investments. “States like Florida and Texas and Colorado want this industry, and they want it bad,” he said. “They compete for it every day. Washington has every advantage it needs to lead them all, and the window to use those advantages is open right now.”
Advertisement
Boeing has historically been the state’s leading venture in aerospace, but when you focus on ventures that concentrate strictly on space, Blue Origin is high on the list. Seattle is particularly strong in the satellite sector: More than half of the world’s satellites are built in the Seattle area, thanks to SpaceX’s Starlink facilities in Redmond and Woodinville, plus Amazon Leo’s factory in Kirkland, BlackSky’s production plant in Tukwila and Xplore’s operation in Bellevue.
Gravitics, Interlune, Portal Space Systems, Starcloud and Starfish Space are among other space ventures represented on the Washington Space Council. The list also includes elected officials, union leaders, educators and investors, plus representatives from space-related tech companies and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
The 23-member Washington State Council includes representatives from government, academia and the space industry. Click on the image to get the full list from the Washington State Department of Commerce.
Ferguson said the council will “identify barriers for the industry and find opportunities for growth.”
“That includes, by the way, workforce development, infrastructure and much more,” he said. “And the council will look for ways we might be able to develop Washington-based commercial launch capabilities. That would be a very exciting addition to what we’re doing right here in Washington.”
Ferguson brought a member of the audience, 10-year-old Sebastian Yu, to the stage when he signed the executive order that officially created the council. After the signing, the governor handed the pen to Yu.
Advertisement
“Your assignment, Sebastian, is that when we do that first launch, you have to save this pen and bring it with you to the first launch,” Ferguson said. “Take care of this pen, OK? I’m going to expect to see it again someday.”
Notes from the kickoff:
Space Northwest presented three awards to recognize contributions to the region’s space industry. The Shooting Star award for municipal support went to the city of Kent, Wash. Portal Space Systems won the Rising Star award for emerging space companies, and SpaceX won the North Star Award for large space companies.
Kent Mayor Dana Ralph noted that her city’s connection to the space industry goes back to Boeing’s work on the lunar rovers for NASA’s Apollo moon missions in the 1970s, while acknowledging that Kent can’t rest on its laurels. “Our job is to make it possible for companies to build and grow and hire. That means reinvesting in the basics: roads, great mobility, water, sewer, plentiful and easily accessible energy and industrial land,” she said.
Mehran Mesbahi, professor and chair of the University of Washington’s Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, highlighted efforts to boost careers in the space industry. “We have Husky Satellite Lab, a group of energized students at UW, and we’re going to create a certificate program around space systems going forward,” he said.
Seattle Space Week continues on Tuesday with the Space Northwest Symposium at the Federal Way Performing Arts & Event Center.
Among the many joys of having a cat is the daily battle with the mess they leave behind. No matter what you try, finding litter and pet hair on furniture or in your bed is inevitable — either they track it in, or you do. If you’re a pet parent like me, this means searching for additional bits of litter and stray hairs that find their way into places you really don’t want them, including the bed. Short of pulling the sheets off entirely, few fixes exist.
I took a chance and tested the SandBar Roller, a $30 dual-roll lint roller, to see if it can make it easier to keep stray hair and litter at bay. I also put it through the paces for other lint-roller tasks like dusting and cleaning floors. Here’s how it fared.
How SandBar Roller differs from other lint rollers
The SandBar Roller Starter Kit I tested included the roller head, an extendable handle and two preinstalled lint rolls.John Carlsen/CNET
The SandBar Roller’s appeal lies in its two large lint rollers instead of one. While the idea doesn’t seem like much of a departure from a typical large lint roller, I couldn’t find any other dual-roller designs intended for use between bedsheets like SandBar. By arranging the rollers in this way, SandBar can clean the top and bottom sheets simultaneously without getting stuck.
The Best Handheld Vacuums, Tested by CNET
Advertisement
While SandBar markets its proprietary lint rolls as stronger than normal rolls, they’re not much different from what you’ll find on the extra-large pet hair version of the Scotch-Brite lint roller. Both are 8 inches wide, with an inner diameter of 1.5 inches. Much to SandBar’s credit, its six-pack of refill rolls is just $20, which is very competitive with other lint roll refills I found on Amazon, with the optional subscription price dropping to just $16 for each one-, two- or three-month delivery.
Testing the SandBar Roller
The extendable handle is very practical.John Carlsen/CNET
Ostensibly, this design targets coastal homes, where sand gets everywhere — hence the SandBar name. While I don’t live on the coast, I’ve experienced sand in my bed while traveling, or after day trips to the desert, and cat litter is a near-daily occurrence. With that in mind, I conducted a series of informal tests to see how the SandBar Roller holds up.
Upon putting SandBar between the sheets, I noticed it moved fairly smoothly, at least until it snagged on some sheets that were too loose. It didn’t jam, but that means it works better for beds with the sheet firmly tucked at the foot — something I don’t do for various sleep-friendly reasons. Still, it worked well after tightening the sheets a bit, even snagging a few cat hairs and litter fragments. It’s a nice alternative to washing the sheets as frequently as I have to now.
I like the stickiness of the rolls, which is satisfyingly tacky without leaving residue or making it difficult to pull off used strips.John Carlsen/CNET
The SandBar removed cat fur from hard-to-reach places
Next, I wanted to see how it handled cleaning smart window shades and curtains, which often collect fur as my cat patrols windows a few times a day. It was a little more awkward, but taking the handle off proved effective, and the sticky roller collected a substantial amount of fur. I had to peel off multiple sheets because of the amount of fur, but it took only a few passes to clean the curtain. The SandBar Roller was very useful on furniture and pet beds, but I noticed that being too aggressive can occasionally dislodge a roll.
The SandBar Roller left a fairly clean surface when I dusted off a TV cabinet and soundbar. Still, I wouldn’t trade it out for the duster and handheld vacuum I usually use. Likewise, it did well on the linoleum floor and carpet near my cat’s litter box, but still I prefer the cleaner result I get from vacuuming.
Should you buy the SandBar Roller?
The specialized design does its job well, but is probably too niche for people who aren’t pet parents or near vast swathes of sand.John Carlsen/CNET
At $30, the SandBar Roller is unlikely to break anyone’s budget, especially when you can find similarly large bed lint rollers for the same price. In that context alone, including the cost of refill rolls, it’s probably as good as any other option. Still, the dual-roll design’s ability to get between sheets is a compelling reason to consider the SandBar Roller over the competition. The design suits households that typically deal with a lot of sand and litter in the beds. I could even see myself taking it camping for quick dirt cleanup in a sleeping bag.
However, I wouldn’t recommend it for short-term beach house rentals because it cuts corners — new guests expect clean sheets when they arrive. That said, making a SandBar Roller available during a guest’s visit could be worthwhile to improve their experience, as long as you leave instructions explaining what it’s for and how it works.
Advertisement
If you don’t need the second roll — and mainly deal with pet hair on furniture — the ChomChom Roller doesn’t need refill rolls, making it a much better option for $25. Likewise, a handheld vacuum can do the same job with a bit more flexibility around the house — though it’s not quiet enough to use when others are sleeping. While it’s nice to have so many options, it’s always worth going with what works best for your needs and situation.
John Carlsen has more than a decade of experience testing and reviewing home tech products, with a major focus on smart home security. He earned his BS in journalism from Utah Valley University. In addition to his CNET contributions, John has written for Android Police, TWICE, Home Theater Review, SafeWise, ASecureLife and Top Ten Reviews.
See full bio
If you haven’t heard of Metal Gear, you probably haven’t played video games these last few decades. The original Metal Gear dates back to 1987 and launched on the MSX, but the real rise to fame probably started with Metal Gear Solid on the original PlayStation in 1998. What needed a hefty console in 1998 can comfortably fit on a microcontroller in 2026, though, as [David Montero Crespo] demonstrates with his port of MGS to the ESP32-S3.
[David] is — as we always are — standing on the shoulders of giants with this hack. Most specifically, the project relies entirely on the [FoxdieTeam] MGS Reversing decompliation project. Of course what one team decompiles, another can recompile, and in this case [David] chose to recompile the game for Expressif’s exceptional ESP32. It wasn’t quite as easy as just forking the repo and compiling with the ESP32 as a target though, as the blog post explains.
We won’t spoil it, but [David] did have to make some changes to account for the different quirks the MIPS processor in the PlayStation has compared to the Xtensa cores on the microcontroller. Then to make it playable, he put the ESP32-S3 module onto some perfboard with an analog stick from a drone controller, an ILI9341 LCD panel, and a resistor ladder to run the buttons for a barebones handheld.
OpenAI was gearing up to release GPT-6.1 Astra, its next AI model, with an October launch in its sights. That’s no longer happening. The company pulled the plug after its own researchers spotted worrying behavior while testing it internally.
What went wrong with GPT-6.1 Astra?
On paper, Astra-6.1 was an upgrade over the current GPT-6 Astra. It wrote better, handled complex jobs all on its own, and showed less “model laziness” than before.
OpenAI
However, in an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Saachi Jain, OpenAI’s head of safety systems, said the model slipped in two important areas. First, it sometimes misled users about what it had actually done. Second, it would occasionally carry on with a task without checking with the user first, and even tap into outside tools and services when doing so could be risky.
“For anything regarding safety and alignment, there’s a trade-off,” Jain said. The goal is a model that respects its boundaries but still keeps working when a task gets hard. Astra fell short of OpenAI’s bar, so the public launch was called off.
Why is OpenAI hitting the brakes now?
AI agents have had a messy few months. Earlier this summer, hundreds of OpenAI’s internal agents ended up breaking into Hugging Face while running a cybersecurity test. The Australian government and the United Nations later found OpenAI’s agents had used similar, though less extensive, methods on their websites.
Advertisement
Andrew Neel / Unsplash
Last week, OpenAI also halted training on its most powerful models after one agent found a loophole in its internet restrictions and queried a public chatbot. OpenAI says Astra is a separate case. Lawmakers are watching, too. According to WSJ, a Senate subcommittee is holding a hearing on rogue AI agents this week, and Florida’s Attorney General has been suing OpenAI since June.
What does this mean for you?
You won’t be getting GPT-6.1 Astra anytime soon. OpenAI hopes to reuse its base model to build future GPT-6 models and is digging into what caused the problems. Personally, I’d rather wait for an AI that’s honest about its work than use one that goes off and does its own thing.
New research suggests Enceladus may be an especially promising place to search for extraterrestrial life: microbes similar to those found near Earth’s hydrothermal vents survived in lab conditions designed to mimic the Saturnian moon’s subsurface ocean. A separate study also found that material blasted from Enceladus’ plumes may naturally separate and concentrate salts, organics and potential biosignatures into individual ice grains, potentially making them easier for future spacecraft to detect.
“That is great news in the search for life,” Frank Postberg, lead author of one and co-author of the other of these new studies and professor at Freie Universitat Berlin, said in a statement. “Future spacecraft will have to analyze many individual ice particles in the plume. But if they come across one with microbial material in it, they could identify biosignatures in the particle relatively easy with already available technology.” Space.com reports: Enceladus isn’t the only place in our solar system with water — so, why is it so exciting in the search for life? Well, it has to do with the seafloor of its extensive, liquid ocean. Down deep at the bottom of this body of water, scientists think hydrothermal processes, or movement or reactions with hot water under the surface, are taking place. The plumes shooting upward from the ocean also contain trace amounts of salts and organic compounds. NASA’s Cassini spacecraft found these traces when it flew through the plumes over a decade ago. Between the hydrothermal activity and the organics and minerals in the water, this moon’s ocean has a number of aspects that could be involved in supporting life.
What’s more, using a combination of Cassini data, theoretical models and laboratory experimentation, in Postberg’s new study the team found that the plume’s water droplets blasting out into space at up to 621 miles per hour (1,000 kilometers per hour) don’t freeze as quickly as expected. Before, scientists thought the freeze would happen instantaneously once the droplets reached space, but Postberg and fellow researchers say they found the freezing would actually happen much slower.
They also found that during this freezing process, the salt, organic compounds (and maybe possible signs of life) in the water droplets separate from one another. Not only that, but the team says that as the particles are blasted out into space, they should often collide with the icy cracks of the planet’s surface. This ultimately would leave behind tiny shards of frozen droplets with individually separated out components. Essentially, it’s like the planet has organized its oceanic ingredients into tiny, frozen particle fragments. This work is described in two new studies published in the journal Science Advances here and here.
In context: Android smartphone maker Nothing has launched the Headphone (1) Pro, its new flagship audio product, which it claims combines an elevated listening experience for consumers with studio-grade production and mixing features for professionals. It succeeds last year’s Nothing Headphone (1), which TIME named one of its Best Inventions of 2025.
The biggest change in the new model is a three-driver audio system. It includes a bass dynamic driver designed to add more punch and sensitivity to low frequencies, a precision dynamic driver that adds more texture to vocals and instruments, and a new treble xMEMS driver that Nothing says delivers crisper highs.
Nothing also worked with London’s Metropolis Studios to tune the Headphone (1) Pro, with the collaboration focused on professional audio tools and soundstage characteristics.
The company also highlights an improved adaptive active noise cancellation system that uses a 10-microphone array to more accurately filter ambient noise than the first-gen model. With claimed noise reduction of up to 46 dB, Nothing is positioning the Headphone (1) Pro against premium rivals from Bose and Sony.
Advertisement
Nothing says the improvement in noise reduction should be particularly noticeable in strong winds or noisy traffic. The headphones also feature redesigned ear cushions with an 8mm silicone baffle wall inside, creating a stronger sound barrier and improving the seal around the ears.
The Headphone (1) Pro supports Hi-Res wireless audio and wired playback over USB-C at up to 24-bit/192 kHz. It also offers five modes of Dynamic Spatial Audio with head tracking, along with five new custom EQ profiles. A separate Flat EQ switch is designed to give producers and creators a more neutral sound profile.
The Headphones 1 Pro is built out of aluminum and titanium to provide a durable shell while creating a premium look and feel. It also retains Nothing’s transparent design language, using shatter- and scratch-resistant 9H Panda Glass on both ear cups to reveal parts of the triple-driver architecture.
Despite the increased use of metal, Nothing has reduced the headphones’ weight to 327 grams through a redesigned internal architecture, including replacing steel arms with titanium. Other changes intended to improve comfort over longer listening sessions include a wider headband with thicker padding and softer ear cushions.
Advertisement
The Headphone (1) Pro is positioned to compete with premium models such as the Sony WH-1000XM6, Bose QuietComfort Ultra, and Apple AirPods Max. It is priced at $399 and will be available beginning September 29 through Nothing’s official store at nothing.tech, Amazon, and Best Buy stores across across the US and Canada.
Ned Jenkinson of the University of Birmingham and Matthew Weightman of the University of Oxford discuss how advancements in brain research might affect how we learn and grow our skillsets.
Whether learning a new piano piece or adapting your tennis serve, acquiring physical skills depends on your brain’s ability tostrengthen and refine neural connections. Researchers are exploring whether this process can be accelerated with technology.
Scientists are particularly interested in the potential of non-invasivebrain stimulation, a group of techniques that can alter brain activity without surgery.
If these techniques can successfully enhanceneuroplasticity, the brain’s ability to reorganise and form new connections during learning, then they could be of use anywhere where performance depends on learning complex movements, from sport and music to surgery and beyond. Researchers are also seeing if these technologies could help with learning non-physical skills, such aspicking up a foreign language.
Elite sport, professional gaming and high-performance workplaces could all become targets for these enhancements if they prove effective. Brain stimulation could also have a big role to play in medicine, helping patients recover physical skills lost through injury or disease, such asstroke.
Studies suggest there’s a lot of potential here. But translating this potential into useful tech that reliably boosts learning physical skills remains a big challenge.
Stimulating findings
Research into enhancing motor learning with electric or magnetic stimulation has been gaining momentum since the turn of the millennium, with early studies garnering considerable excitement.
Advertisement
In atypical experiment, participants might learn a sequence of finger movements similar to practising scales on a piano while receiving stimulation over brain regions involved in movement. Other studies have examined how stimulation could be used forbalance training or teachingsports-relatedskills orsurgical techniques.
Some of these experiments produced eye-catching results, finding that participantslearned certain movement tasks faster orretained skills for longer if they underwent brain stimulation. But other studies failed to find benefits. And in some cases, researchers struggled to replicate the success of earlier promising experiments when repeating them.
One reason for these mixed findings is that there’s no such thing as a universal ‘learning network’ in our brains. Different skills rely ondifferent combinations of areas near the surface of the brain as well as those deep within it.
Additionally, people can respond very differently to the same stimulation. Factors such as age, anatomy, genetics and even baseline skill level may influence whether stimulation is beneficial. Add to that the infinite number of ways to apply stimulation, the picture becomes murkier.
Advertisement
Despite these challenges, the field continues to evolve in its quest to enhance motor learning. For instance, rather than broadly stimulating the brain, researchers are increasingly targeting specific neural circuits involved in learning.
This is partly thanks to advances inneuroimaging andcomputational modelling, which has allowed scientists to predict how electrical currents travel through a person’s brain. Newer brain stimulation technologies, such as focused ultrasound, can also now reach deep structures involved in skill acquisition.
The goal is to use these technologies not simply to increase brain activity, but to influence the right neural circuit at the right time during learning. This idea builds on a fundamental principle of neuroscience, often summarised as“neurons that fire together, wire together”. When brain cells are repeatedly activated at the same time, the connections between them become stronger.
By carefully timing stimulation tocoincide with the movements made during practice, researchers hope to reinforce the neural pathways involved in learning a new skill. In principle, this could make stimulation more reliable and more effective than current approaches, but researchers are stillfine tuning exactly how this would work.
Advertisement
Motoring ahead
Important questions remain. Who would have access? Should stimulation be regulated in competitive environments such as sport? And how much evidence should be required before consumer devices are marketed to healthy users?
These questions are becoming increasingly relevant as brain stimulation moves beyond the laboratory and clinic. A number of at-home devices are now available for people to buy.Some have receivedregulatory approval, as they’re indicated for treating medical conditions such as depression. But there’s also a growing market for devices forcognitive and performance enhancement. For these uses, no regulatory approval is needed.
The technology is advancing rapidly, but evidence to support it and regulations governing it are still trying to catch up. Proper frameworks for its adoption may simply be bypassed by the ready possibility of ‘DIY’ brain stimulation.
For now, brain stimulation is unlikely to transform anyone into an overnight virtuoso or elite athlete. But as researchers develop increasingly precise ways of targeting the neural circuits that underpin learning, the prospect of enhancing human performance is shifting from science fiction towards scientific possibility.
Advertisement
The challenge today is not simply learning how to influence the brain, but deciding where, when and why we should.
Ned Jenkinson is a senior lecturer in human movement sciences at the School of Sport and Exercise Sciences at the University of Birmingham. His research incorporates a range of techniques including non-invasive brain stimulation, electrophysiological recording, eye-tracking, neuroimaging and behavioural techniques. He uses these techniques to investigate how the brain controls movement and how it allows us to learn new motor skills.
Matthew Weightman is a postdoctoral researcher at the Oxford Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging in the Plasticity Group at the University of Oxford, led by Prof Heidi Johansen-Berg. He is broadly interested in the field of sensorimotor neuroscience. His current work focuses on the role of sleep to recovery after stroke. More specifically, he is interested in how we can improve sleep after a stroke, whether improved sleep in stroke patients relates to better functional recovery, and if physiological processes that occur during sleep can be enhanced post-stroke to boost consolidation.
Advertisement
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
Keio Corporation (Keio), a major private railway operator in Japan, said its network was hit by a ransomware attack over the weekend, disrupting some of its business systems.
Following a system failure in the early hours of Saturday, the company confirmed the attack and shut down its network to prevent additional damage.
The company said it is investigating the extent of the impact and whether the attackers accessed any customer or business partner information.
Keio is a large Japanese railway operator with 85 km of track and 69 stations, as well as a separate hospitality business of 25 hotels. The company has over 2,200 employees and a reported annual revenue of about $2.6 billion.
Advertisement
“In the early hours of September 26, 2026, we confirmed a ransomware attack on our group’s servers. We have reported the incident to the police and are conducting an investigation into the attack’s route and damage with the cooperation of external experts,” Keio says.
The incident appears to have affected only the hospitality side of Keio’s business, not train operations.
A separate announcement published on the company’s Keio Plaza Hotel Tokyo website is warning of possible delays on some customer-facing services.
At the time of writing, BleepingComputer could not find a ransomware group claiming the attack on Keio.
BleepingComputer has contacted the company to request more information about the incident, and we will update this post with their response once it reaches us.
Tokyo Metro has also disclosed a cyber incident over the weekend in which attackers gained unauthorized access to its systems and accessed 59,000 member email addresses.
Although both Keio and Tokyo Metro are Japanese railway operators, it is unclear if the organizations were targeted in a coordinated campaign by the same threat actor.
Advertisement
Tokyo Metro is a major transit operator that runs nine subway lines covering 195 km and 180 stations, carrying an average of 7 million passengers daily.
The company said the breached systems contained only email addresses and that it has already identified and closed the security weakness the attackers used in this case.
Join Mikko Hyppönen and security leaders from the NFL, CHANEL, and Atlassian for a two-hour digital summit on what AI-speed attacks change, what defenders should stop doing, and how to validate, decide, fix, and re-validate at machine speed.
Home puts chats, delegated work, and Office documents inside one interface
Code lets non-programmers describe software and have Copilot build it
Autopilot can continue recurring work without waiting for another instruction
Microsoft has introduced a redesigned version of its Copilot AI platform which claims to combine chat, delegated work, and coding tools into a unified application experience for users.
The company says the update is meant to let individuals and organizations scale artificial intelligence across everyday tasks and long-term projects.
Three new capabilities anchor this release, including Home, Code and Autopilot, each aimed at a different kind of work.
Latest Videos FromTechRadar
Advertisement
Home brings Chat and Cowork together
The Home tool brings together two existing modes, Chat for quick questions and Cowork for tasks users delegate entirely, under one shared starting point.
Word, Excel, and PowerPoint now operate inside this same interface, letting users draft documents, budgets, and presentations without switching applications.
In these documents, Copilot is now grounded in Fabric IQ, pulling context from more than 20 million semantic models built in Power BI.
Edits made by colleagues or by the assistant itself appear in real time, so progress stays synchronized across a shared file.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
A new plugin registry will let organizations manage Microsoft, partner and custom-built plugins from one central catalog starting this month.
Advertisement
Independent developers and partners can also publish plugins once for use across multiple Copilot surfaces under the new registry arrangement.
The Code tool allows non-programmers to describe an app, tracker or dashboard in plain language and have it built automatically.
This feature runs on the same underlying technology used in GitHub Copilot and can be hosted within a company’s own systems.
Advertisement
Autopilot operates without constant prompting
Autopilot, the third addition, is a persistent agent capable of completing recurring work without needing a new instruction each time.
It can run supplier reviews or similar multi-step processes, build schedules, contact stakeholders, and follow up on outstanding items independently.
Because it operates continuously in the cloud, work can continue late at night or whenever a person’s attention shifts elsewhere.
Advertisement
A related feature called Today, entering private preview in October, will summarize missed messages and pending tasks across mail and chat.
Microsoft is also tying spending controls to these tools through a system it calls FinOps for AI, letting administrators track usage.
Administrators can set spending limits, approve credit requests and restrict which AI models different teams are permitted to use each month.
Everyday tasks like quick answers or first drafts run on a fixed-price subscription, while agentic features use usage-based billing.
Advertisement
Code, Cowork and Autopilot all fall under this usage-based pricing model, alongside frontier models Microsoft refers to as Astra and Fable.
Home and Code are set to roll out through Microsoft’s Frontier program within weeks, and Autopilot enters private preview by month’s end.
Microsoft has not released independent data showing how widely the three features are being adopted, how accurate they are, or how much time they actually save.
Automate your Mac with ease using Shortcuts and Apple Intelligence.
Filipe Espósito for Engadget
Shortcuts has been available on Mac since macOS Monterey, but it’s one of those utilities many Mac users have never explored. At first, it can seem too complicated. You have to know which actions to choose and how to connect them, then hope it all works.
But macOS 27 Golden Gate changes that with Describe a Shortcut, which lets you type exactly what you need and have Shortcuts do the heavy work for you with AI. It doesn’t always work, but it makes the app much easier to use — especially if you’re not an expert.
If you’re not familiar with Shortcuts, it’s an automation tool where you create scripts to handle tasks on your devices. Apple’s own example is a shortcut that texts your spouse with an estimated arrival time based on traffic when you’re leaving work. But you can get much more complex, like a shortcut that checks your calendar and the weather to give you a summary of what to expect today.
Advertisement
There are many possibilities, and now with macOS 27, it’s much easier to master the app.
Creating shortcuts on your Mac is easy
Filipe Espósito for Engadget
Creating a new shortcut takes a few seconds. Open the Shortcuts app on your Mac and click the Plus button to enter a prompt. The more details you provide, the more likely the app is to get your shortcut right. A command like “Clean up my Downloads” might be too vague for the app to understand what you really want. Instead, try something like “Every Friday, move anything in my Downloads folder older than 30 days into a folder called Archive.” You’re more likely to end up with a working shortcut when you provide clear details.
This is a good example of how Shortcuts are helpful for tasks you often forget to do; no one really cleans out their Downloads folder unless they’re trying to free up space. Plus, you can check the result right away by opening the folder and looking at what moved. If the shortcut moved too much, re-enter the prompt with even more specific details.
Advertisement
A shortcut can also be great for summarizing long text with Apple Intelligence. Try something like “Take the text on my clipboard, summarize it in three sentences and save it to a new note.” Then copy a long article or an email, run the shortcut and you’ll have the short version in Notes.
Make your shortcuts easier to reach
Filipe Espósito for Engadget
If a shortcut isn’t part of your normal routine, chances are you’ll forget about it after a while. Thankfully, you can assign a keyboard combo to a shortcut, or pin it to the menu bar, so you’ll never forget it.
Choose the shortcut you want to adjust and click Edit. Go to the Shortcut Details menu (the one with the information icon) and select Add Keyboard Shortcut. To add it to the Control Center or menu bar, open Control Center on your Mac (at the top-right) and select Edit Controls. There, all you have to do is add the action from the Shortcuts app, and you’re all set. Exploring the Automation tab is also a good idea for creating a seamless workflow of shortcuts that run on their own when you need them.
Advertisement
Shortcuts isn’t the only element in macOS 27 that acts on your behalf. Visual Intelligence has its own key combo: Shift + Command + Space. After pressing this, select a window on-screen and have Siri answer questions about it or take action, like adding an event to your calendar. Try it on an email with a date buried in it, for example. Siri can also run your shortcuts via voice, speaking of which.
Shortcuts and Siri AI require Apple Intelligence, which means you need a Mac with an M1 chip or later — Intel Mac users are out of luck. Also, some limits may apply when using Apple’s AI models in Shortcuts. More complex prompts could reach a limit faster.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login