Connect with us

Tech

243 jobs that pay a minimum of S$100K/yr

Published

on

Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated, any opinions expressed below belong solely to the author. Data sourced from Michael Page’s Salary Guide Singapore 2026.

The new year is here and with it, new data on the labour market and salaries in Singapore. British recruitment giant PageGroup through its Michael Page arm is first to the punch in 2026 with its annual Salary Guide.

Specialising in recruitment of mid- to senior-level professionals for corporations, the company builds salary projections for the year ahead based on its own data, which it then lists across 13 sectors and presents with minimum, median and maximum salary bands.

Their full report consists of over 400 roles which you can view on their site linked above. We’re focusing on those listed as paying a minimum of S$100,000 per year—or a bit over S$8,300 per month.

Advertisement

In addition, I extracted the maximum salaries for each role, to give you an idea of the difference between entry salaries at each level and the potential at the higher end.

Here’s the filtered list for 2026. All figures below are gross amounts in SGD and include bonuses and incentives:

Accounting & Finance

Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
Head of Treasury S$230,000 S$350,000
M&A Director S$230,000 S$350,000
Head of Tax S$230,000 S$350,000
Head of Investor Relations S$225,000 S$280,000
Finance Director S$220,000 S$330,000
Internal Audit Director S$210,000 S$330,000
Enterprise Risk Management/ Risk and Compliance Director S$210,000 S$280,000
Finance Transformation Director S$200,000 S$300,000
Head of Corporate Finance S$200,000 S$300,000
Head of Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) S$200,000 S$310,000
Plant Controller S$155,000 S$210,000
Project Controller S$155,000 S$210,000
Business Controller S$150,000 S$210,000
Financial Controller S$150,000 S$210,000
M&A Manager S$140,000 S$210,000
Enterprise Risk Management/ Risk and Compliance Manager S$140,000 S$175,000
Internal Audit Manager S$140,000 S$175,000
Internal Control Manager S$140,000 S$175,000
Corporate Finance Manager S$140,000 S$175,000
Treasury Manager S$140,000 S$175,000
Finance Business Partner S$140,000 S$190,000
Transfer Pricing Manager S$120,000 S$190,000
Tax Manager S$120,000 S$190,000
Finance Transformation Manager S$120,000 S$175,000
Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) Manager S$120,000 S$175,000
Finance Manager S$105,000 S$175,000
Group Finance Manager S$105,000 S$175,000
M&A Associate S$105,000 S$175,000
Accounting Manager S$105,000 S$165,000
Senior Tax Analyst S$105,000 S$140,000
Credit Controller S$105,000 S$130,000
Finance Analyst S$100,000 S$140,000
Senior Accountant S$100,000 S$130,000

Banking & Financial Services

Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
Corporate Banking Relationship Manager, Executive Director S$250,000 S$350,000
Buy-side, Investment Director/ Principal S$250,000 S$390,000
Investment Banking Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A), Vice President S$200,000 S$390,000
Buy-side, Investment Vice President S$190,000 S$380,000
Portfolio Manager, Director S$180,000 S$350,000
Private Banking Relationship Manager, Director S$180,000 S$360,000
Corporate Banking Relationship Manager, Vice President S$180,000 S$250,000
Buy-side, Trader Vice President S$150,000 S$300,000
Fund Manager S$150,000 S$320,000
Private Banking Client Advisor S$150,000 S$250,000
Operational Risk Manager S$114,000 S$144,000
Investment Banking Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) Experienced Associate S$110,000 S$290,000
Actuary S$108,000 S$180,000
Underwriter S$108,000 S$156,000
Investigations Manager S$108,000 S$144,000
Buy-side, Investment Associate S$100,000 S$280,000

Digital

Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
Vice President of Product S$252,000 S$375,000
Digital Marketing Director S$245,000 S$345,000
Director of User Operations S$225,000 S$320,000
Head of Product S$212,000 S$300,000
Head of Digital S$210,000 S$300,000
Director of Product S$210,000 S$345,000
Head of Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) S$144,000 S$192,000
Senior Product Manager S$144,000 S$180,000
E-commerce Manager S$140,000 S$225,000
Digital Marketing Manager S$140,000 S$210,000
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Manager S$140,000 S$189,000
Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) Manager S$140,000 S$189,000
Product Manager S$140,000 S$175,000
Social Media Manager S$140,000 S$168,000
Digital Project Manager S$138,000 S$192,000
Head of Media Buying S$132,000 S$180,000
User Operations Manager S$128,000 S$168,000
Head of User Experience/ User Interface (UX/ UI) S$120,000 S$180,000

Engineering & Manufacturing

Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
Site Director S$308,000 S$352,000
Engineering Director S$275,000 S$385,000
General Manager S$253,000 S$297,000
Head of Production S$253,000 S$297,000
Energy Trader S$253,000 S$297,000
Deputy General Manager S$220,000 S$264,000
Quality Director S$220,000 S$264,000
Research & Development Director S$220,000 S$264,000
Plant Manager S$176,000 S$220,000
Quality Manager S$143,000 S$198,000
Senior HSE Manager S$132,000 S$171,000
Research & Development Manager S$121,000 S$165,000
Manufacturing Manager S$121,000 S$165,000
Engineering Project Manager S$110,000 S$165,000
Engineering Manager S$110,000 S$154,000
Engineering Operations Manager S$110,000 S$154,000
Maintenance Manager S$110,000 S$165,000
Continuous Improvement Manager S$110,000 S$154,000
Production Manager S$110,000 S$165,000
Innovation Manager S$110,000 S$154,000
HSE Manager S$105,000 S$143,000
Shift Manager S$105,000 S$143,000
Quality Auditor S$105,000 S$132,000

Healthcare & Life Sciences

Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
Country Director S$220,000 S$320,000
Head of Manufacturing S$220,000 S$320,000
Medical Affairs Director S$220,000 S$320,000
Commercial Head S$200,000 S$240,000
Head of Business Development S$200,000 S$240,000
Business Director S$200,000 S$250,000
Country Manager S$200,000 S$250,000
Regulatory Affairs Director S$190,000 S$240,000
Head of Marketing S$180,000 S$220,000
Regional Sales Manager S$180,000 S$250,000
Quality Director S$180,000 S$250,000
Regional Marketing Manager S$180,000 S$220,000
Plant Manager S$160,000 S$220,000
Senior Key Account Manager S$150,000 S$200,000
Product Manager S$150,000 S$200,000
Market Access Manager S$150,000 S$200,000
Medical Affairs Manager S$150,000 S$220,000
Process Manager S$140,000 S$180,000
Engineering Manager S$140,000 S$180,000
Manufacturing Manager S$140,000 S$180,000
Operations Manager S$140,000 S$180,000
Senior Quality Manager S$140,000 S$180,000
Regulatory Affairs Manager S$135,000 S$165,000
Business Development Manager S$100,000 S$150,000
Key Account Manager S$100,000 S$150,000
Sales and Marketing Manager S$100,000 S$150,000
Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist S$100,000 S$140,000
Quality Manager S$100,000 S$140,000
Senior Scientist S$100,000 S$140,000

Human Resources (HR)

Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
HR Director S$240,000 S$320,000
Head of Reward S$240,000 S$300,000
Head of Organisational Design S$200,000 S$280,000
Senior HR Business Partner S$180,000 S$250,000
Head of Recruitment S$180,000 S$250,000
Head of Learning & Development S$160,000 S$260,000
Senior HR Consultant S$150,000 S$240,000
Recruitment Director S$144,000 S$180,000
Organisational Design Manager S$132,000 S$180,000
HR Consultant S$120,000 S$180,000
Senior HR Manager S$120,000 S$180,000
Reward & Benefits Manager S$120,000 S$180,000
Recruitment Manager S$100,000 S$150,000
Reward & Benefits Analyst S$100,000 S$144,000
Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
General Counsel/ Head of Legal S$300,000 S$500,000
Head of Compliance S$240,000 S$350,000
Head of Risk S$220,000 S$350,000
Partner S$200,000 S$800,000
Of Counsel S$180,000 S$600,000
Senior Legal Counsel S$180,000 S$300,000
Intellectual Property Counsel S$170,000 S$400,000
Compliance Director S$170,000 S$240,000
Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) Counsel S$160,000 S$500,000
Banking Transactions Counsel S$160,000 S$400,000
Data Privacy and Protection Counsel S$160,000 S$400,000
Employment Counsel S$150,000 S$250,000
Regulatory Counsel S$144,000 S$300,000
Commercial Counsel S$132,000 S$275,000
Senior Associate S$120,000 S$500,000
Risk Manager S$120,000 S$156,000
Legal Counsel S$120,000 S$180,000
Compliance Manager S$120,000 S$150,000
Financial Crime Analyst S$100,000 S$144,000

Marketing

Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
Marketing Director S$220,000 S$300,000
Head of Communications S$160,000 S$220,000
Head of Marketing S$150,000 S$230,000
Corporate Communications Assistant Director S$144,000 S$168,000
Product Marketing Manager S$120,000 S$180,000
Senior Brand Manager S$110,000 S$220,000
Corporate Communications Manager S$110,000 S$170,000
Trade Marketing Manager S$100,000 S$180,000
Marketing Manager S$100,000 S$190,000
External Communications Manager S$100,000 S$180,000

Procurement & Supply Chain

Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
Vice President, Procurement S$255,000 S$330,000
Vice President, Supply Chain S$255,000 S$330,000
Head of Commodity/ Sourcing S$215,000 S$275,000
Procurement Director S$215,000 S$275,000
Supply Chain Director S$215,000 S$275,000
Planning Director S$170,000 S$220,000
Logistics Procurement Head S$170,000 S$220,000
Ocean Freight Director S$170,000 S$220,000
Operations Director S$155,000 S$200,000
Head of Logistics S$155,000 S$200,000
Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) Manager S$110,000 S$145,000
Operations Manager S$100,000 S$130,000
Commodity/ Sourcing Manager S$100,000 S$130,000
Costing Manager S$100,000 S$130,000
Procurement Manager S$100,000 S$130,000
Supply Chain E-commerce Manager S$100,000 S$130,000
Supply Chain Manager S$100,000 S$130,000
Supply Chain Programme Manager S$100,000 S$130,000
Import/ Export Manager S$100,000 S$130,000
Trade Compliance Manager S$100,000 S$130,000
Logistics Project Manager S$100,000 S$130,000

Sales

Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
Sales Director (Enterprise) S$240,000 S$550,000
Account Executive (Enterprise-Market) S$200,000 S$450,000
Regional Sales Director S$180,000 S$300,000
Regional Business Development Director S$170,000 S$270,000
Country Head S$170,000 S$240,000
Senior Sales Manager (System Integrator company) S$160,000 S$400,000
Senior Business Development Manager S$150,000 S$195,000
Commercial Manager S$140,000 S$180,000
Partner Sales Manager S$130,000 S$350,000
Sales Manager (System Integrator company) S$120,000 S$320,000
Account Executive (Mid-Market) S$100,000 S$300,000

Secretarial & Business Support

Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
Head of Administration S$108,000 S$230,000

Sustainability & ESG

Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
Partner, ESG Consultancy S$300,000 S$420,000
Sustainable Finance Vice President S$180,000 S$240,000
Head of Sustainability / Director S$180,000 S$240,000
ESG Consulting Manager S$100,000 S$144,000
Carbon Credits Trader S$100,000 S$144,000

Technology

Job title Minimum annual salary Maximum
Head of GenAI S$225,000 S$300,000
Data Director/ Head of Data S$220,000 S$260,000
IT Director S$200,000 S$320,000
Data Scientist S$160,000 S$210,000
Enterprise Architect S$160,000 S$240,000
Solution Architect S$160,000 S$240,000
Programme Manager S$160,000 S$190,000
Infrastructure Lead S$150,000 S$205,000
Scrum Master S$144,000 S$170,000
Cloud DevOps Lead S$144,000 S$200,000
Back-end Developer S$140,000 S$195,000
Quantitative Developer (Quant Dev) S$140,000 S$230,000
IT Security Architect S$140,000 S$200,000
Algorithm Engineer S$140,000 S$200,000
Front-end Developer S$140,000 S$185,000
Full-stack Developer S$140,000 S$185,000
Mobile Developer S$140,000 S$185,000
IT Manager S$130,000 S$180,000
Service Delivery Manager S$130,000 S$180,000
Cloud Solution Architect S$130,000 S$170,000
Digital Transformation Manager S$125,000 S$165,000
Development and Operations (DevOps) Engineer S$125,000 S$185,000
Blockchain Engineer S$120,000 S$200,000
Infrastructure Architect S$120,000 S$180,000
IT Project Manager S$120,000 S$180,000
AI Engineer S$120,000 S$180,000
HR SuccessFactors Consultant S$120,000 S$155,000
IT Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) Manager S$120,000 S$160,000
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Developer S$115,000 S$145,000
Technical Writer S$115,000 S$185,000
Database Administrator S$115,000 S$165,000
Development, Security, and Operations (DevSecOps) Engineer S$110,000 S$180,000
AI Researcher S$110,000 S$200,000
Lead System Engineer S$110,000 S$165,000
IT Business Analyst S$110,000 S$150,000
IT Audit Manager S$110,000 S$150,000
Cloud Engineer S$108,000 S$160,000
Application Support Analyst S$105,000 S$125,000
Game Developer S$105,000 S$135,000
Test Analyst/ Quality Assurance (QA) Engineer S$105,000 S$135,000
Machine Learning/ Internet of Things (IoT) Engineer S$100,000 S$150,000
Systems Applications and Products (SAP) Consultant S$100,000 S$140,000
Oracle Fusion Manager S$100,000 S$135,000

Steady but cautious market in Singapore

While the situation in Singapore remains stable, with low unemployment and positive real growth in incomes, Michael Page’s Singapore Senior Managing Director, Nilay Khandelwal, notes that employers remain cautious given the global uncertainty, which is reflected in extended time-to-hire—it has grown by 5 to 10% as compared to 2024.

Singapore’s consistent policy environment and strong business fundamentals continue to foster confidence and attract investment.

Nilay Khandelwal

Advertisement

Which is why, those bold enough to look for a career switch could still hope to get a salary boost of 10 to 15%—or around two to three times more than the expected annual average. If you’re already a bit above the annual median of S$70,000, it might just be enough to get you up into the S$100,000 club.

Depending on your speciality, there seems to be quite a few paths to achieve that in 2026.

  • Read other articles we’ve written on Singapore’s job market here.

Featured Image Credit: Shadow of Light/ Shutterstock.com

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

Sophia Space raises $10M to accelerate creation of orbital computing systems

Published

on

An artist’s conception shows the Sophia 40 TILE satellite, with each tile powered by its own solar panel. (Sophia Space Illustration)

Sophia Space says it has closed a $10 million seed financing round to accelerate the development of orbital computing systems that could serve as the foundation for space-based data processing.

The startup’s tabletop-sized satellite modules take advantage of a proprietary system that combines solar power generation and radiative cooling. Multiple tiles can be connected into racks to provide scalable computing power in low Earth orbit. The infrastructure concept is called Thermal-Integrated LEO Edge, or TILE.

“With this seed round, we’re not just building compute modules,” Sophia Space CEO Rob DeMillo said today in a news release. “We’re building the infrastructure for the next era of space-based AI and data processing.”

The investment round was led by Alpha Funds, KDDI Green Partners Fund and Unlock Venture Partners — and builds upon $3.5 million in pre-seed investment. The newly raised cash will support the continued hiring of engineering talent, the further maturation of Sophia’s TILE platform and the formation of strategic partnerships in the orbital computing ecosystem.

Sophia Space is based in Pasadena, Calif., and was founded by Leon Alkalai, a former fellow at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory who now serves as the company’s chief technology officer. But the venture has a Pacific Northwest connection in chief growth officer Brian Monnin, who worked at Intel and Microsoft before founding Seattle startups Play Impossible and Quivr.

Advertisement

In-space computing is increasingly gaining attention because of the potential for launching orbital data centers for artificial intelligence applications.

Orbital data centers could address some of the major challenges surrounding terrestrial data centers, such as the need for land and electrical power. But finding a way to cool data center satellites amid the vacuum of space poses its own technical challenge. Sophia’s founders say the company’s TILE architecture, combined with the placement of satellites in orbits around Earth’s day-night terminator, can address the cooling challenge.

Sophia Space is planning to conduct in-space demonstrations of its software with an existing communications network later this year.

DeMillo told GeekWire that the company is planning to start with edge computing applications — for example, doing on-orbit processing of imaging data collected by Earth observation satellites. “Until we get to the level where we’re going to be putting up our own orbital data centers, selling these as edge computers allows income to flow into the company and gets our name out there, and allows us to refine things going forward,” he said.

Advertisement

He said Sophia Space is planning to deliver its first TILE modules to customers in 2028.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How U Business’ new 3-Line Bundle with free flagship phone works

Published

on

[This is a sponsored article with U Business.]

U Business just launched a new mobile device bundle to solve one of the biggest headaches for growing companies: getting teams properly equipped without burning cash upfront.

The U Biz 3-Line Bundle is a limited-time offer that packages multiple business lines together under one plan, with free flagship smartphones. Yes, including the latest Apple iPhone 15 and Samsung Galaxy S25.

Designed to make connectivity easier, it’s built on U Mobile’ 5G network to support the day-to-day needs of Malaysian entrepreneurs and SMEs, regardless of whether your team is desk-bound or constantly on the move.

Advertisement

Here’s everything you need to know about the new U Biz 3-Line Bundle.

The smarter business upgrade

As mentioned, the bundle gives businesses three mobile lines under a single plan, available with either the U Biz 68 or U Biz 98. Each line comes with a free flagship 5G smartphone, with no upfront payment required for the devices.

Instead of buying phones separately and managing multiple subscriptions, this limited-time offer bundle allows companies to consolidate your mobile needs into one structured plan. 

Image Credit: U Business

In today’s Instagram and TikTok-driven world, flagship 5G smartphones are now a necessary productivity tool for businesses. Yet, buying several devices at once may not be financially strategic as it can strain cash flow, especially when paired with recurring operational expenses.

With the U Biz 3-Line Bundle, entrepreneurs and SMEs are able to spread those costs into predictable monthly payments. 

Advertisement

What’s more if this new bundle includes flagship 5G devices. Businesses can choose between premium iOS and Android options, including the Apple iPhone 15 and Samsung Galaxy S25.

Access to these newer flagship 5G devices means that the team is able to enjoy stronger performance and longer software support. Thereby translating to more reliable day-to-day work tools.

Business performance without compromise

Businesses get to choose between the U Biz 68 (which starts from RM68/month per line) and the U Biz 98 (which starts from RM98/month per line). 

Image Credit: U Business

Both plans are built for high-usage business environments. On the data front, users get up to 1,000GB of 5G high-speed data, supporting faster downloads, smoother video calls, real-time cloud collaboration, and reliable hotspot usage across teams.

Communication-wise, the bundle includes unlimited local calls, so teams can stay connected internally and with clients without worrying about extra charges.

Advertisement

There’s also free global roaming in over 60 destinations, useful for businesses that have regional travel needs or cross-border operations.

By combining multiple lines and devices under one bundle, companies can better optimise their monthly expenses. 

Image Credit: ZDNET / TechRadar

All-in-one connectivity for SMEs

As Malaysia’s 5G ecosystem continues to expand, having access to a strong 5G network becomes increasingly important for businesses that operate across multiple locations.

Whether you’re a new startup or a business scaling up, the U Biz 3-Line Bundle is suited for teams of all sizes who want to stay connected without breaking the bank, regardless of where work takes you.

So if your team is seeking premium devices, then this is one bundle deal you do not want to miss. 

Advertisement

To sign up or learn more about the U Biz 3-Line Bundle, check out the website here.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Meta AI Security Researcher Said an OpenClaw Agent Ran Amok on Her Inbox

Published

on

Meta AI security researcher Summer Yue posted a now-viral account on X describing how an OpenClaw agent she had tasked with sorting through her overstuffed email inbox went rogue, deleting messages in what she called a “speed run” while ignoring her repeated commands from her phone to stop.

“I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb,” Yue wrote, sharing screenshots of the ignored stop prompts as proof. Yue said she had previously tested the agent on a smaller “toy” inbox where it performed well enough to earn her trust, so she let it loose on the real thing. She believes the larger volume of data triggered compaction — a process where the context window grows too large and the agent begins summarizing and compressing its running instructions, potentially dropping ones the user considers critical.

The agent may have reverted to its earlier toy-inbox behavior and skipped her last prompt telling it not to act. OpenClaw is an open-source AI agent designed to run as a personal assistant on local hardware.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

BluOS Partners with airable to Enhance Radio and Podcast Discovery Across NAD, Bluesound, PSB and More

Published

on

Tens of millions of people listen to podcasts and stream internet radio every day. The challenge isn’t access, it’s organization. With content spread across multiple apps and platforms, discovery can feel fragmented, and for many listeners that means sticking to the familiar rather than finding something new.

BluOS, the premium multi-room audio software platform from Lenbrook Media Group is addressing that with a new partnership with airable. The first phase integrates airable’s extensive global catalog of internet radio stations and podcasts directly into the BluOS Controller app.

The update gives BluOS users centralized access to a wide range of programming, from independent shows like the eCoustics Podcast to widely followed titles such as The Joe Rogan Experience, The Daily, and thousands of global radio stations. Rather than requiring separate apps, content is surfaced within the BluOS interface itself, with browsing tools organized by country, genre, city, and newly added stations.

Because BluOS operates as the software layer across hardware brands including Bluesound, NAD Electronics, PSB Speakers, DALI, Monitor Audio, Cyrus Audio, and Roksan, the integration rolls out across a broad installed base without requiring new hardware.

Advertisement

The goal is straightforward: streamline radio and podcast discovery inside the same control environment users already rely on for music streaming and multi-room playback.

bluos-airable-iphone-app-popular-podcasts

What Is airable?

airable is a Germany-based media services provider that supplies internet radio and podcast aggregation to audio brands, automakers, and streaming platforms.

In simple terms, airable is the infrastructure layer. It licenses, organizes, and maintains access to a massive catalogue of global radio stations and podcasts, then integrates that catalogue into partner ecosystems through APIs and backend services.

Rather than each company negotiating station agreements or building its own discovery engine, airable handles:

Advertisement
  • Aggregation of tens of thousands of global radio stations
  • Podcast indexing and catalog updates
  • Metadata, categorization, and search tools
  • Geographic portals (country, city, genre browsing)
  • Ongoing catalogue maintenance and scalability

For platforms like BluOS, airable acts as the content backbone behind the scenes. The user experience lives inside the BluOS Controller app, but the station and podcast database, discovery structure, and updates are powered by airable’s media services platform.

It’s not a consumer-facing brand most listeners recognize — and that’s intentional. It operates quietly in the background, enabling centralized radio and podcast access without requiring users to jump between separate apps.

bluos-airable-iphone-app-popular-podcasts

The Bottom Line

By integrating airable into BluOS, Lenbrook adds a large, structured catalogue of global radio stations and podcasts directly inside the BluOS Controller app. That means no separate radio app, no bouncing between podcast platforms, and no fragmented search experience.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Who benefits? Existing BluOS users across BluesoundNAD Electronics, PSB SpeakersDALIMonitor AudioCyrus Audio, and Roksan. They get broader access and improved discovery through a software update, not a hardware upgrade.

Advertisement

In practical terms, BluOS becomes a more complete listening hub with music, radio, and podcasts in one control environment without adding complexity.

For more information: bluos.io

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

James Cameron Complains About Netflix/Warner Bros Merger, Doesn’t Acknowledge A Paramount Deal Would Be Much Worse

Published

on

from the gargantuan-ego dept

We’ve explained in detail how Larry Ellison is trying to scuttle Netflix’s planned merger with Warner Brothers because he wants to buy CNN and HBO, and, as he’s doing with CBS (and now TikTok) turn them into a safe space for right wing zealots, autocrats, and oligarchs. He’s unsubtly trying to build the kind of autocrat-friendly state television we’ve seen arise in places like Orban’s Hungary.

Since Donald Trump and MAGA want the same thing, they’ve been helping Ellison’s quest along, first by launching a campaign against “woke Netflix” across right wing media, and more recently by launching a fake DOJ “antitrust investigation” that scrutinizes the Netflix Warner Bros merger “to protect the public interest,” but ignores the fact that a Paramount/Warner tie up would be arguably worse.

Enter Director James Cameron, who last week decided to “help” by writing a publicized letter to Senator Mike Lee, lamenting the Netflix Warner Brothers merger (and only the Netflix merger) as “disastrous to the motion picture business.” Cameron, who in the letter calls himself a “humble movie farmer,” seems to mostly be concerned with the a possible shortening of the 45-day theater-to-streaming window:

He’s also doubtful Netflix would stick to its pledge about keeping movies in theaters for a set amount of time; his letter cited a 17-day theatrical window that was cited in an earlier Deadline report, rather than the more recently mentioned 45-day window.

“What administrative body will hold them to task if they slowly sunset their so-called commitment to theatrical releases?” Cameron wondered.

Advertisement

Traditional theater owners have been particularly and understandably sensitive about the shortening of this window since COVID demonstrated the outdated nature of such arbitrary restrictions. Major chains like AMC haven’t helped themselves on this front; their biggest innovation of late has been to saddle brick-and-mortar theater visitors with more ads than ever.

Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos didn’t take Cameron’s public grievances well, saying he’d already met with Cameron about maintaining the 45-day release window, and lamented Cameron’s participation in a “Paramount disinformation campaign:”

“I met with James personally in late December and laid out for him our 45-day commitment to theatrical exhibition of films and to the Warner Bros slate,” Sarandos told Fox Business’ The Claman Countdown today in the latest sit-down in the exec’s seemingly never-ending media blitz this week. “I have talked about that commitment in the press countless times. I swore under oath in front of the Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust that that’s what we would be doing.”  

“So I am … I’m particularly surprised and disappointed that James chose to be part of the Paramount disinformation campaign that’s been going on for months about this deal,” Sarandos said, sticking it at the same time to the Oscar winner and his David Ellison-owned WB rival.

The weird part about Cameron’s missive is he doesn’t mention Paramount at all in his letter to Lee, despite the fact that it’s extremely likely that Paramount would be just as bad on shortening release windows. And given that Paramount and Warner have way more structural similarities than Netflix and Warner, the number of layoffs would likely be significantly worse.

Advertisement

This is before you even get to the fact that Larry Ellison is clearly gobbling up media giants in service to our violent kakistocracy, something that seems kind of important to mention if you’re going to inject yourself into the middle of the debate. Cameron mentions none of this; either because he doesn’t know, or because he was potentially made promises by Ellison and Paramount and didn’t want to be transparent about it (neither of which is good).

None of this is to say that a Netflix Warner Brothers merger would be great for consumers or the market. Media consolidation always results in layoffs, higher prices and steadily eroded product quality. Ideally you’d block all additional media consolidation and impose meaningful limits. But that’s simply not happening under Trump, making the Netflix Warner tie up the best of a bunch of bad options.

Anybody trying to do any good (and that includes Dem lawmakers) in the regulatory reality we currently inhabit would likely have to concur Netflix owning Warner is better than Ellison owning the entirety of U.S. media. Especially given what we’ve all been witnessing over at CBS (and know from years of watching Ellison’s nonexistent ethics at Oracle). Strange days, strange bedfellows.

Filed Under: consolidation, film, james cameron, larry ellison, media, mike lee, release windows, state television, streaming, ted sarandos, theaters

Companies: netflix, paramount, warner bros. discovery

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Researchers can now detect tampered smartphones from miles away

Published

on

Researchers from the American Institute of Physics’ publishing arm have developed a technique that could change how smartphones are inspected for tampering and hidden modifications. Instead of physically examining a device, the team demonstrated a way to detect whether a smartphone has been altered using radio-frequency signals from a distance.

The work introduces what researchers describe as a robust over-the-air testing platform that analyzes how a smartphone’s radio hardware behaves when it communicates wirelessly. The idea is surprisingly simple. Every phone’s radio components produce a unique “fingerprint” when transmitting signals. If a device has been modified, damaged, or compromised, that fingerprint changes in subtle but measurable ways.

The team showed that this method can reliably distinguish between original, untouched phones and devices that have been tampered with. Because the system works wirelessly, it could theoretically be used to check phones without needing physical access. That opens the door to entirely new ways of verifying device integrity.

Why remote phone verification matters

Detecting hardware tampering today usually requires physical inspections or specialized lab testing, which makes large-scale verification difficult in places like airports, offices, or secure facilities. The new approach aims to change that by using a remote test setup that analyzes a phone’s radio-frequency behavior and compares it to known baselines to spot signs of modification.

This could open the door to practical uses across multiple industries. Governments and enterprises could screen devices entering sensitive environments, manufacturers could verify products throughout supply chains, and even second-hand marketplaces could confirm that phones haven’t been altered before resale.

The research is still experimental, but it reflects a growing shift toward hardware-level security. While everyday users may never interact with this technology directly, the idea of phones being quietly verified from a distance points to a future where device trust checks happen behind the scenes.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Which Power Tool Brand Is Best?

Published

on





The age old question of which tool to buy still keeps home improvers and professionals up at night. Every brand delivers its own strengths, and no two tools will provide exactly the same performance or experience. This makes crowning a definitive champion among the field of excellent options challenging, if not outright impossible. The market is constantly shifting, and today’s top dog may be relegated to a lesser status tomorrow thanks to a new release or even a recall notice on a tool. In 2026, Pro Tool Reviews named Milwaukee the best cordless power toolmaker, but the year prior OnlineTradesman gave the honor of “Best-in-Trade Winner” to DeWalt, with Makita earning the runner up spot. Countless outlets focusing on the tool marketplace have developed numerous rankings systems and come to varying conclusions on the value and positioning of these massively popular brands.

One thing is certain, however: These three toolmakers are virtually unchallenged at the podium when considering the power tool ecosystem. While they may trade places frequently, other competitors rarely knock the trio from this perch. In our own testing and research, Milwaukee claimed the top spot, followed by DeWalt and then Makita. It’s important, however, to note that the differences between the toolmakers is razor thin, and all three will serve users exceedingly well. I’ve had the opportunity to use numerous power tools from all three brands, and own cordless tools from two (and corded implements from the third). My experience helped ground the research, but pricing, power, user reviews, and other data points played a primary role in drawing these conclusions.

Advertisement

Catalog range: Makita’s coverage takes the cake

Each of the three tool brands offer something unique to buyers seeking niche equipment. That much is undeniably true, and so it can be difficult to pin down a general scope that hits the mark for every buyer. Milwaukee makes some specialized tools like a power trowel and a drain cleaning air gun. Makita offers gems like an LXT cooler/warmer and coffee machine. DeWalt’s unique options include things like floor sanders and a wide range of pneumatic tools. There’s also the ecosystem hump to get over. For tool owners already invested in one of these brands’ cordless offerings, buying something new comes with the requirement to also tack on batteries and charging equipment. This can dissuade someone from branching out, even if their brand of choice doesn’t make a specific tool required to handle a job on their to-do list.

One approach that can be illustrative of a brand’s value to the generalist is the size of its mainline catalog. All three manufacturers offer numerous product lineups, but each delivers a primary range to the market featuring the bulk of their cordless power tools. Makita’s coverage is the most expansive in this regard, with over 350 LXT tools in its 18V/36V lineup. Milwaukee’s M18 cordless system ranks second here, with over 325 tools, including both its standard and Fuel badged options, and DeWalt brings up the rear with over 250 20V Max XR tools. It’s worth noting, however, that Milwaukee has consistently been an innovator at the cutting edge of needs experienced by pro users, so there’s a bit of bonus heft to the red and black power tool option.

Advertisement

Power output: Milwaukee reigns supreme

Output capability is a constant concern for anyone reaching for power tools. These implements are only as good as the force they can apply to a fastener, board, or other workpiece element, after all; a tool that doesn’t radically improve upon the force you can generate by hand is one that’s frankly worthless. Fortunately, none of these three primary competitors can realistically be accused of lacking the power necessary to accomplish tasks. All three make heavy duty tools as well as delicate force producers for use in nuanced application or removal tasks.

If it’s power you’re after, though, Milwaukee is the undisputed leader of the pack. Milwaukee tools, on the whole, deliver the best in power output across the trio, but this sometimes comes at the detriment of control or rotational speed. Sheer muscle is found most easily here, but that’s not always the goal; buyers will want to think about the actual demands of their typical job parameters before simply investing in the tool with the highest torque output or deepest cut capacity while resisting bind ups. With that being said, if you’re fastening substantial timbers for emergency preparations or building a large structure, Milwaukee’s added power output may be a welcome addition. DeWalt offers a strong showing, too, but lags behind Milwaukee with added emphasis on battery capabilities, tool integrations, and ergonomics. Makita brings up the rear while leaning even more significantly into functional enhancements beyond sheer force production.

Advertisement

Integrated technologies: Makita’s high-tech chops shine

Makita’s ergonomic designs are far and away the best of the bunch. Similar attention is paid to elements like its STAR Protection Computer Controls and anti-vibration technologies. Makita tools feature numerous exclusive technological upgrades that don’t exist in other product catalogs. This sets the Makita tool ecosystem apart from its competitors as an innovative brand with lots of quality of life enhancements to offer its users. Coupled with the large catalog, Makita makes a strong case for itself as a flagship option that any kind of tool user might happily settle upon when shopping for near gear.

DeWalt is also a force to be reckoned with in the premium functionality department. The brushless motors the company uses in its power tools are a highlight of the brand’s technological prowess, even as brushless power production is featured across all three brands. DeWalt’s batteries are also more durable than Milwaukee’s offerings, and feature FlexVolt capability as well as a higher top end with a 15Ah option. Milwaukee sits comfortable at the bottom of the pack here.

Advertisement

Pricing: Milwaukee (and sometimes DeWalt) offer the best cost efficiency

In many comparisons across these three tool brands, pricing is largely similar. There’s not a huge divergence across the board, but some trends do start to emerge as more tools are stacked up against one another. While each brand will undoubtedly offer the cheapest tool of the three in some categories and at certain times (with sale pricing and phase outs muddying the waters even further), on average, Makita is the most expensive of the three. Where Milwaukee and DeWalt land in relation to one another is, surprisingly, a matter of perspective.

Because Milwaukee’s M18 range features both a standard lineup and its enhanced Fuel tool system, making direct comparisons can be a little difficult. Among its flagship M18 tools, Milwaukee comes in as the cheapest overall manufacturer in this comparison, with DeWalt notably more expensive. We performed a roundup of five common home improvement and jobsite tools (drills, jigsaws, miter saws, angle grinders, and multitools) to get a direct sense of the typical pricing buyers can expect. Makita’s average LXT tool price was $311.60, while DeWalt averaged $246.20 across its 20V Max XR range. Milwaukee averaged $271.80 when considering Fuel tools exclusively and $231.80 with three standard M18 models subbed in where applicable. Because the difference is marginal when evaluating the premium solutions in Milwaukee’s stable, and across the breadth of the Milwaukee catalog it tends to come out as the more cost-effective option, DeWalt necessarily sinks into the second position in terms of overall pricing.

Advertisement

User reviews: DeWalt digs out the best overall user rating by a hair

User feedback is perhaps even more important than any singular datapoint when comparing the tools that brands offer to the market. In many instances, the differences between tools are slight, and can come down entirely to personal preference over any distinguishable advantage that an individual unit holds over its competition. Naturally a smaller drill that doesn’t sacrifice power offers better access in tight spaces, and a circular saw with a deeper cut depth can handle increased demands. But none of these brands provides every tool in their arsenal with a functional range that exceeds the alternatives. However, user experiences across the board can be instructive when trying to understand how well each brand hits the mark it’s looking to set with its equipment.

Across a selection of the five standard home improvement and jobsite tools we looked at earlier, DeWalt earned the highest overall rating with a 4.778 average score (out of 5). The brand’s tools collected a total of 32,781 reviews. Second place went to Milwaukee, with 8,406 reviewers giving it a slightly lower 4.761 average across both its Fuel products and standard M18 models. Makita brought up the rear with a 4.717 average across 4,640 reviews. It’s worth noting that Milwaukee’s score is heavily dependent on the treatment of its Fuel and standard model ranges. Focusing on Fuel-badged tools alone boosts its score to 4.794 over 6,180 reviews, bumping it into first position. Substituting standard models where applicable, the score sinks down to 4.646 with 7,008 total reviews, and dropping firmly into last place among the three brands. With this in mind, a combined score feels to be the most just approach to evaluating its offerings.

Advertisement

Methodology

We ranked the three brands based on points accrued for each category, with first being worth 3 points, second yielding 2 points, and third adding 1 point to the tally. For the final two categories, we evaluated pricing and user feedback on five mainline tools that many buyers will either have already or prioritize for typical, future projects. They were the brand’s full-sized offerings of drill/driver, miter saw, jigsaw, oscillating multitool, and angle grinder. After finalizing the scores, Milwaukee came out with 11 points, DeWalt with 10, and Makita had earned 9. It’s worth noting that Milwaukee earned top marks in price based on overall costs across the flagship M18 range, but when evaluating only Fuel-badged tools the margin between the brands was so thin that the increase in price actually swaps their overall point totals and therefore their positions.

However, it seems appropriate to score Milwaukee on the breadth of its M18 range and not just the most expensive end of the products within that segment of the catalog. This choice does serve to highlight the value that each brand brings to the table, with all three offering excellent tools that users can gain a lot of value from, regardless of their personal preference.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

CarGurus data breach exposes information of 12.4 million accounts

Published

on

CarGurus data breach exposes information of 12.4 million accounts

The ShinyHunters extortion group has published personal information in more than 12 million records allegedly stolen from CarGurus, a U.S.-based digital auto platform.

CarGurus is a publicly traded automotive research and shopping company that operates in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K. Its website has an estimated 40 million monthly visitors and helps people find, compare, and contact sellers of new and used vehicles.

On February 21, the threat group published a 6.1GB archive containing 12.4 million records, saying it was from CarGurus. A day later, the HaveIBeenPwned (HIBP) data breach monitoring and alerting platform added the dataset, listing the following data types as compromised:

Wiz
  • Email addresses
  • IP addresses
  • Full names
  • Phone numbers
  • Physical addresses
  • User account IDs
  • Finance pre-qualification application data
  • Finance application outcomes
  • Dealer account details
  • Subscription information

Although CarGurus has not released an official statement disclosing a data breach and did not respond to BleepingComputer’s request for comment, it is important to note that HIBP attempts to confirm the validity/authenticity of the leaked records before adding them.

HIBP reports that 70% of the leaked data was already on its database from previous incidents, so roughly 3.7 million records are fresh. Since the information is freely available for download, cybercriminals could take advantage of it for phishing attacks.

Advertisement
CarGurus listed as a victim on ShinyHunters data leak site
ShinyHunters lists CarGurus as their victim
Source: BleepingComputer

CarGurus users are advised to stay alert for potentially malicious communications and scam attempts leveraging the leaked information.

The ShinyHunters data extortion group has been very active recently, claiming multiple attacks on large companies and leaking their data when negotiations reached a dead end.

The most recent examples include Dutch telecommunications provider Odido, ad tech firm Optimizely, fintech firm Figure, outerwear brand Canada Goose, restaurant chain Panera Bread, online dating company Match Group, and music streaming platform SoundCloud.

The threat group typically uses social engineering, most commonly voice phishing, to breach organizations, directing victims to credential-harvesting pages that grant them access to SaaS platforms such as Salesforce, Okta, and Microsoft 365.

Previous ShinyHunters campaigns also involved tricking employees into installing malicious OAuth applications that granted them API-level read access to customer data tables inside Salesforce instances. 

Advertisement

Modern IT infrastructure moves faster than manual workflows can handle.

In this new Tines guide, learn how your team can reduce hidden manual delays, improve reliability through automated response, and build and scale intelligent workflows on top of tools you already use.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Founders of long-lost weather app Dark Sky return with a new forecast platform, and it’s already better than Apple’s unreliable flagship weather predictions

Published

on


  • Dark Sky founders have launched a new forecast app, Acme Weather
  • The new app displays alternate forecast readings to show weather changes that could occur throughout the day
  • It’s also added a community reporting tool, as well as refined custom notifications settings

Remember the days of the Dark Sky weather app before it was dissolved by Apple? Well, its creators are back with an alternative that acknowledges that weather forecasts are often very wrong.

The new weather forecast platform, called Acme Weather, is now available to download on iOS devices, with plans to bring it to Android already in the works. You can try it out with a two-week free trial, and then it requires a $25 yearly subscription fee, working out a lot cheaper than Dark Sky’s $3.99 monthly charge.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Astell&Kern HC5 Review: Flagship Sound in a Pocket-Size Dongle?

Published

on

Astell&Kern is best known for building some of the most over-engineered and unapologetically expensive digital audio players on the planet. From established flagships like the SP4000 to more experimental plays like the PD10, the brand has long leaned on premium materials, ambitious engineering, and pricing that assumes you’re already committed. The HC5 takes a different route. It’s a portable USB DAC that promises flagship-grade DNA in a far smaller, supposedly more affordable package. However, at nearly $500, it’s priced squarely in entry-level DAP territory and staring down serious competition.

So, is the HC5 a smart way to get A&K sound without carrying a brick? Or is it an awkward middle ground that costs too much for what it is? Let’s get into it.

Build

astell-kern-hc5-dongle-dac-connected-campfire-andromeda-10-iems
The HC5 paired with the Campfire Audio Andromeda 10

The HC5 features an aluminum chassis with a small OLED screen on its top face. The display shows key details such as volume level, playback rate, and connection info. The sides of the chassis are gently beveled, which aids in ergonomics. The HC5’s screen is bright-enough to be viewed easily in sunlight, but no so bright that it is distracting in a dim room. That’s good, since A&K did not implement any way to adjust screen brightness.

astell-kern-hc5-dongle-dac-left-side

The left side of the chassis features a single button and volume scroll wheel. Both are aluminum, and neither are set very firmly. The scroll wheel has a bit of wiggle, even when not being rotated. The side button is a little better, but isn’t as tactile as you can find on other devices. A little give on a button usually doesn’t bother me much, but a near-$500 USB-C dongle should offer a top-notch physical interface as well. 

astell-kern-hc5-dongle-dac-input-bottom

The top of the HC5 houses the USB-C input and the scroll wheel. From this angle, the wheel’s slight slack is visible even when the unit is at rest—noticeable, but not catastrophic. The USB-C port, by contrast, is rock solid. There’s no play or flex when a cable is connected, which is genuinely confidence-inspiring.

Around back, the HC5 offers both 3.5mm single-ended and 4.4mm balanced outputs. Both sockets are firmly mounted in the chassis and, like the USB-C port, remain completely wiggle-free. Astell&Kern also gets the accessories right: the included USB-C-to-USB-C and USB-C-to-Lightning cables are thick, well-finished, and reassuringly sturdy. They’re double-shielded as well, which should keep signal interference from crashing the party.

astell-kern-pd10-hc5-audioengine-hxl
Left to right: Astell&Kern PD10 DAP, Astell&Kern HC5, Audioengine HXL

It’s worth noting that the HC5, while considerably more compact than a full-size A&K DAP, is nearly twice the volume of many other high-end, high-performance dongle DACs. Some of that bulk comes from the inclusion of a screen; some of it is down to Astell&Kern’s signature scroll wheel. Fair enough, but a portable DAC still needs to be portable.

Advertisement

The HC5 isn’t enormous, but it’s large enough to be awkward. It doesn’t fit comfortably in some stock IEM cases, and it’s also too big for most common MagSafe DAC holders. That puts it in an uncomfortable middle ground: smaller than a DAP, yet noticeably less convenient than the best compact dongles it’s competing against.

astell-kern-hc5-dongle-dac-adapter-cables

DAC

The A&K HC5 is the very first portable DAC to feature the AKM AK4499EX. This is a high-end chip that Astell&Kern typically reserves for flagship-level products. It’s paired with an AK4191EQ for a proper premium audio experience. A&K integrates this novel application of these chips with their flagship-derived “high-driving mode” tech that allows them to achieve a pretty impressive power-to-size ratio. 

Sample Rates

The HC5 offers broad support for high-resolution audio formats, with no obvious limitations for portable use. It handles PCM up to 768 kHz at 32-bit resolution and supports native DSD playback through DSD512 in stereo.

Supported formats:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement
  • PCM: 8 kHz – 768 kHz (8 / 16 / 24 / 32-bit)
  • DSD (Native):
    • DSD64 (2.8 MHz), stereo
    • DSD128 (5.6 MHz), stereo
    • DSD256 (11.2 MHz), stereo
    • DSD512 (22.4 MHz), stereo

This puts the HC5 in line with other high-end portable DACs in terms of format compatibility, without introducing format-related constraints.

Output Level

Power output in portable USB-C DACs is constrained by several factors, including the power-delivery limits of Android and iOS devices, as well as the USB-C standard itself. Even so, not all portable DACs are created equal.

The HC5 offers stronger output than most, which isn’t surprising given its larger-than-average footprint. Its 3.5mm single-ended output delivers 2.5 Vrms, while the 4.4mm balanced output reaches 5 Vrms—placing it ahead of many competing premium dongle DACs in terms of available voltage.

Output Impedance

Output impedance plays an important role in how a DAC interacts with headphones and IEMs. Higher output impedance can alter frequency response which can be perceived as added warmth particularly with sensitive, multi-driver IEMs that use complex crossovers.

The HC5’s output impedance is low by portable standards. The 4.4mm balanced output measures 1.1 ohms, while the 3.5mm single-ended output is even lower at 0.5 ohms. At these levels, audible effects are minimal, with the 1.1-ohm balanced output only likely to be noticeable on the most sensitive multi-driver IEMs.

Advertisement

Listening

astell-kern-hc5-dongle-dac-campfire-andromeda-10-iems-atop
The Campfire Audio Andromeda 10 paired with the Astell&Kern HC5

At 5 Vrms, the HC5 has enough output to comfortably drive most common headphones. Even higher-end models like the Meze 109 Pro and Audio-Technica ATH-ADX3000 reach satisfying volume levels with solid dynamic range. Less-demanding planar magnetic headphones also perform well, though listeners who prefer very high listening levels or who use more power-hungry designs may still benefit from a dedicated desktop amplifier.

campfire-audio-astrolith-iems
Campfire Audio Astrolith

For portable use, the HC5 is clearly capable. Demanding planar IEMs like the Campfire Audio Astrolith reach high listening levels without strain, allowing the drivers to perform as intended. The HC5’s low, but not zero output impedance doesn’t meaningfully alter the sound. Sensitive IEMs such as the Campfire Audio Andromeda 2019 remain stable and consistent, with no obvious tonal shifts when switching between the 3.5mm single ended and 4.4mm balanced outputs.

More importantly, that consistency was not limited to ultra sensitive earphones. Regardless of the IEM or full size headphone used, the overall tonal balance remained intact. There was no sense of the balanced output adding artificial weight, nor the single ended output sounding comparatively thinner or softer.

There is no such thing as a completely neutral source or amplifier. Every design leaves a fingerprint, whether subtle or obvious. That said, this one comes very close. It avoids editorializing the signal, preserves timbre with discipline, and lets the transducer do the talking.

The Bottom Line

The Astell&Kern HC5 is a truly-premium portable DAC. Buyers that want to experience Astell&Kern’s flagship audio hardware can finally do so without having to drop many thousands on their top-tier DAPs, like the SP4000. That said, A&K needs to improve their manufacturing tolerances to reduce slack on both the volume wheel and the side-button. A nearly $500 device should be as premium to physically interact with as it is to listen-to. Buyers that treat audio as a price-no-object experience have a lot to like about the HC5 . However, those that are looking to maximize price-to-performance will want to check out cheaper, similarly-powerful dongles like the Audioengine HXL or Campfire Audio Relay.

Advertisement

Pros

  • Impeccable sound quality
  • True flagship performance
  • Lightweight and ergonomic
  • Runs cool

Cons

  • Expensive
  • Scroll wheel and button lack firmness
  • Too large for common MagSafe setups

Where to buy:

You can find the HC5 for sale at Bloom Audio and Moon Audio for $489.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025