Tech
43% of AI-generated code changes need debugging in production, survey finds
The software industry is racing to write code with artificial intelligence. It is struggling, badly, to make sure that code holds up once it ships.
A survey of 200 senior site-reliability and DevOps leaders at large enterprises across the United States, United Kingdom, and European Union paints a stark picture of the hidden costs embedded in the AI coding boom. According to Lightrun’s 2026 State of AI-Powered Engineering Report, shared exclusively with VentureBeat ahead of its public release, 43% of AI-generated code changes require manual debugging in production environments even after passing quality assurance and staging tests. Not a single respondent said their organization could verify an AI-suggested fix with just one redeploy cycle; 88% reported needing two to three cycles, while 11% required four to six.
The findings land at a moment when AI-generated code is proliferating across global enterprises at a breathtaking pace. Both Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and Google CEO Sundar Pichai have claimed that around a quarter of their companies’ code is now AI-generated. The AIOps market — the ecosystem of platforms and services designed to manage and monitor these AI-driven operations — stands at $18.95 billion in 2026 and is projected to reach $37.79 billion by 2031.
Yet the report suggests the infrastructure meant to catch AI-generated mistakes is badly lagging behind AI’s capacity to produce them.
“The 0% figure signals that engineering is hitting a trust wall with AI adoption,” said Or Maimon, Lightrun’s chief business officer, referring to the survey’s finding that zero percent of engineering leaders described themselves as “very confident” that AI-generated code will behave correctly once deployed. “While the industry’s emphasis on increased productivity has made AI a necessity, we are seeing a direct negative impact. As AI-generated code enters the system, it doesn’t just increase volume; it slows down the entire deployment pipeline.”
Amazon’s March outages showed what happens when AI-generated code ships without safeguards
The dangers are no longer theoretical. In early March 2026, Amazon suffered a series of high-profile outages that underscored exactly the kind of failure pattern the Lightrun survey describes. On March 2, Amazon.com experienced a disruption lasting nearly six hours, resulting in 120,000 lost orders and 1.6 million website errors. Three days later, on March 5, a more severe outage hit the storefront — lasting six hours and causing a 99% drop in U.S. order volume, with approximately 6.3 million lost orders. Both incidents were traced to AI-assisted code changes deployed to production without proper approval.
The fallout was swift. Amazon launched a 90-day code safety reset across 335 critical systems, and AI-assisted code changes must now be approved by senior engineers before they are deployed.
Maimon pointed directly to the Amazon episodes. “This uncertainty isn’t based on a hypothesis,” he said. “We just need to look back to the start of March, when Amazon.com in North America went down due to an AI-assisted change being implemented without established safeguards.”
The Amazon incidents illustrate the central tension the Lightrun report quantifies in survey data: AI tools can produce code at unprecedented speed, but the systems designed to validate, monitor, and trust that code in live environments have not kept pace. Google’s own 2025 DORA report corroborates this dynamic, finding that AI adoption correlates with an increase in code instability, and that 30% of developers report little or no trust in AI-generated code.
Maimon cited that research directly: “Google’s 2025 DORA report found that AI adoption correlates with an almost 10% increase in code instability. Our validation processes were built for the scale of human engineering, but today, engineers have become auditors for massive volumes of unfamiliar code.”
Developers are losing two days a week to debugging AI-generated code they didn’t write
One of the report’s most striking findings is the scale of human capital being consumed by AI-related verification work. Developers now spend an average of 38% of their work week — roughly two full days — on debugging, verification, and environment-specific troubleshooting, according to the survey. For 88% of the companies polled, this “reliability tax” consumes between 26% and 50% of their developers’ weekly capacity.
This is not the productivity dividend that enterprise leaders expected when they invested in AI coding assistants. Instead, the engineering bottleneck has simply migrated. Code gets written faster, but it takes far longer to confirm that it works.
“In some senses, AI has made the debugging problem worse,” Maimon said. “The volume of change is overwhelming human validation, while the generated code itself frequently does not behave as expected when deployed in Production. AI coding agents cannot see how their code behaves in running environments.”
The redeploy problem compounds the time drain. Every surveyed organization requires multiple deployment cycles to verify a single AI-suggested fix — and according to Google’s 2025 DORA report, a single redeploy cycle takes a day to one week on average. In regulated industries such as healthcare and finance, deployment windows are often narrow, governed by mandated code freezes and strict change-management protocols. Requiring three or more cycles to validate a single AI fix can push resolution timelines from days to weeks.
Maimon rejected the idea that these multiple cycles represent prudent engineering discipline. “This is not discipline, but an expensive bottleneck and a symptom of the fact that AI-generated fixes are often unreliable,” he said. “If we can move from three cycles to one, we reclaim a massive portion of that 38% lost engineering capacity.”
AI monitoring tools can’t see what’s happening inside running applications — and that’s the real problem
If the productivity drain is the most visible cost, the Lightrun report argues the deeper structural problem is what it calls “the runtime visibility gap” — the inability of AI tools and existing monitoring systems to observe what is actually happening inside running applications.
Sixty percent of the survey’s respondents identified a lack of visibility into live system behavior as the primary bottleneck in resolving production incidents. In 44% of cases where AI SRE or application performance monitoring tools attempted to investigate production issues, they failed because the necessary execution-level data — variable states, memory usage, request flow — had never been captured in the first place.
The report paints a picture of AI tools operating essentially blind in the environments that matter most. Ninety-seven percent of engineering leaders said their AI SRE agents operate without significant visibility into what is actually happening in production. Approximately half of all companies (49%) reported their AI agents have only limited visibility into live execution states. Only 1% reported extensive visibility, and not a single respondent claimed full visibility.
This is the gap that turns a minor software bug into a costly outage. When an AI-suggested fix fails in production — as 43% of them do — engineers cannot rely on their AI tools to diagnose the problem, because those tools cannot observe the code’s real-time behavior. Instead, teams fall back on what the report calls “tribal knowledge”: the institutional memory of senior engineers who have seen similar problems before and can intuit the root cause from experience rather than data. The survey found that 54% of resolutions to high-severity incidents rely on tribal knowledge rather than diagnostic evidence from AI SREs or APMs.
In finance, 74% of engineering teams trust human intuition over AI diagnostics during serious incidents
The trust deficit plays out with particular intensity in the finance sector. In an industry where a single application error can cascade into millions of dollars in losses per minute, the survey found that 74% of financial-services engineering teams rely on tribal knowledge over automated diagnostic data during serious incidents — far higher than the 44% figure in the technology sector.
“Finance is a heavily regulated, high-stakes environment where a single application error can cost millions of dollars per minute,” Maimon said. “The data shows that these teams simply do not trust AI not to make a dangerous mistake in their Production environments. This is a rational response to tool failure.”
The distrust extends beyond finance. Perhaps the most telling data point in the entire report is that not a single organization surveyed — across any industry — has moved its AI SRE tools into actual production workflows. Ninety percent remain in experimental or pilot mode. The remaining 10% evaluated AI SRE tools and chose not to adopt them at all. This represents an extraordinary gap between market enthusiasm and operational reality: enterprises are spending aggressively on AI for IT operations, but the tools they are buying remain quarantined from the environments where they would deliver the most value.
Maimon described this as one of the report’s most significant revelations. “Leaders are eager to adopt these new AI tools, but they don’t trust AI to touch live environments,” he said. “The lack of trust is shown in the data; 98% have lower trust in AI operating in production than in coding assistants.”
The observability industry built for human-speed engineering is falling short in the age of AI
The findings raise pointed questions about the current generation of observability tools from major vendors like Datadog, Dynatrace, and Splunk. Seventy-seven percent of the engineering leaders surveyed reported low or no confidence that their current observability stack provides enough information to support autonomous root cause analysis or automated incident remediation.
Maimon did not shy away from naming the structural problem. “Major vendors often build ‘closed-garden’ ecosystems where their AI SREs can only reason over data collected by their own proprietary agents,” he said. “In a modern enterprise, teams typically have a multi-tool stack to provide full coverage. By forcing a team into a single-vendor silo, these tools create an uncomfortable dependency and a strategic liability: if the vendor’s data coverage is missing a specific layer, the AI is effectively blind to the root cause.”
The second issue, Maimon argued, is that current observability-backed AI SRE solutions offer only partial visibility — defined by what engineers thought to log at the time of deployment. Because failures rarely follow predefined paths, autonomous root cause analysis using only these tools will frequently miss the key diagnostic evidence. “To move toward true autonomous remediation,” he said, “the industry must shift toward AI SRE without vendor lock-in; AI SREs must be an active participant that can connect across the entire stack and interrogate live code to capture the ground truth of a failure as it happens.”
When asked what it would take to trust AI SREs, the survey’s respondents coalesced unanimously around live runtime visibility. Fifty-eight percent said they need the ability to provide “evidence traces” of variables at the point of failure, and 42% cited the ability to verify a suggested fix before it actually deploys. No respondents selected the ability to ingest multiple log sources or provide better natural language explanations — suggesting that engineering leaders do not want AI that talks better, but AI that can see better.
The question is no longer whether to use AI for coding — it’s whether anyone can trust what it produces
The survey was administered by Global Surveyz Research, an independent firm, and drew responses from Directors, VPs, and C-level executives in SRE and DevOps roles at enterprises with 1,500 or more employees across the finance, technology, and information technology sectors. Responses were collected during January and February 2026, with questions randomized to prevent order bias.
Lightrun, which is backed by $110 million in funding from Accel and Insight Partners and counts AT&T, Citi, Microsoft, Salesforce, and UnitedHealth Group among its enterprise clients, has a clear commercial interest in the problem the report describes: the company sells a runtime observability platform designed to give AI agents and human engineers real-time visibility into live code execution. Its AI SRE product uses a Model Context Protocol connection to generate live diagnostic evidence at the point of failure without requiring redeployment. That commercial interest does not diminish the survey’s findings, which align closely with independent research from Google DORA and the real-world evidence of the Amazon outages.
Taken together, they describe an industry confronting an uncomfortable paradox. AI has solved the slowest part of building software — writing the code — only to reveal that writing was never the hard part. The hard part was always knowing whether it works. And on that question, the engineers closest to the problem are not optimistic.
“If the live visibility gap is not closed, then teams are really just compounding instability through their adoption of AI,” Maimon said. “Organizations that don’t bridge this gap will find themselves stuck with long redeploy loops, to solve ever more complex challenges. They will lose their competitive speed to the very AI tools that were meant to provide it.”
The machines learned to write the code. Nobody taught them to watch it run.
As evidenced by the Hyundai Boulder Concept and some statements in Kia’s 2026 Investor Day announcements, Kia is getting serious about building a truck. Kia already has a body-on-frame truck, the Tasman, which launched in global markets in 2025, but this potential new offering seems to be different from that particular mid-sized truck.
The new truck, as yet unnamed, will ride on a body-on-frame platform like other American-market trucks from the likes of Toyota, Ford, and General Motors. Whether Kia’s new pickup offering will be able to compete with those well-entrenched models is a question only the future can answer: Kia’s truck isn’t even scheduled to hit the market until 2030.
However, Kia is at least giving the truck a pair of drivetrains that might edge out a win, or at least help it stand out from the competition. More specifically, Kia is aiming to offer two hybrid drivetrains, one of which will be an extended-range model.
An electrified boost
Two giants in the truck industry, Toyota and Ford, already offer hybrid versions of their trucks: Toyota has the newest-generation Tacoma and Tundra, while Ford has the F-150 PowerBoost. However, an extended-range electric vehicle pickup, as the new Kia is supposed to be, would be unique, at least in the North American market.
BYD, the Chinese automaker well known for its electric cars, produces the BYD Shark, a body-on-frame plug-in hybrid pickup, but that truck probably isn’t showing up on American streets anytime soon. As far as American automakers go, Stellantis has teased the Ram Ramcharger — which would have a gas motor to charge its onboard batteries — for years, but it has yet to materialize. Ford has, admittedly, announced a range-extending gas engine for the second-gen F-150 Lightning, but it hasn’t revealed a release date yet.
The new Kia model has the potential to shake up the market, providing American drivers with something unique at a price point that will likely be very competitive. While Kia hasn’t even announced what the truck will look like or what it will be called, it’s certainly a truck to look forward to.
Pellet grill converts aren’t shy about their love for these versatile outdoor cookers, and many, including CNET, regard Traeger as the best in the booming alternative-grill category. Traeger’s pellet grills allow for precise temperature control via convection heat, easy low-and-slow cooking with minimal oversight and wood-fired flavor you won’t get from gas or charcoal setups. But they aren’t cheap.
A full-sized Traeger typically costs the would-be pellet griller about $1,000, but the brand just launched its most budget-friendly line, the Westwood series, ahead of summer 2026. That means you can haul in one of Traeger’s cult-favorite pellet grills with most of its signature bells and whistles for less than $700.
Pellet grills are praised for delivering woodfire flavor and precise temperature control.
The new standard Westwood has 653 square inches of grilling space and sells for $699. The XL sports 823 square inches and will cost you $799 — still cheaper than any other large grill in the Traeger lineup. Until now, the cheapest full-sized Traegers, the Ridgewood series, started at $899.
The Westwood series builds on the advanced engineering and flavor-forward technology that Traeger has refined across its top-of-the-line grills, according to a press release shared with CNET, and fuses them into a grill designed for everyday cooking.
Key Features of the Traeger Westwood series:
- Woodfire flavor with minimal fuss: Natural hardwood pellets and convection airflow work together to deliver richer wood‑fired flavor and consistent results.
- Easy use: WiFIRE with Bluetooth compatibility lets users monitor and control their grill from the Traeger App for effortless, precise cooking.
- More cooking options than most grills: Grill, slow cook, smoke or bake with Traeger’s precise temperature control and convection technology.
- Generous cooking space: Dual‑tier grilling area provides room to cook multiple dishes at once.
- Space to prep: Integrated shelves and storage create a streamlined workspace, keeping tools, ingredients and pellets within easy reach.
With the launch of its Westwood Series, Trager’s pellet grills are more affordable than ever.
The Westwood Series is now available online and in stores through Traeger retailers.
Per the agreement, Amazon will take ownership of Globalstar’s existing operations including its low Earth orbit satellite network and supporting infrastructure, as well as related assets like mobile satellite service spectrum licenses. Amazon is paying $90 per Globalstar share – available either as cash or in Amazon stock – which…
Read Entire Article
Source link
512GB of fast, well-organised storage changes how you actually use a phone, especially when you are shooting 8K video and saving high-resolution 50MP images without a second thought.
Right now, that headroom costs considerably less than it should, with the Google Pixel 10 Pro down from $1,219 to $969 on Amazon, saving you $250 on one of 2025’s most capable Android handsets.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro 512GB is at its lowest price on Amazon right now, giving you more storage for less
256GB of fast, well-organised storage changes how you actually use a phone, especially when you are getting it with a $250 discount.
The camera is the obvious starting point, and on the Pixel 10 Pro it earns genuine attention rather than just marketing language, because the triple rear system pairs a 50MP main sensor with 100x Pro Res Zoom for the kind of detail you would normally need a much bigger camera to capture.
That reach is backed by Google’s Tensor G5 chip, which has been purpose-built with an improved TPU and CPU to run Google’s AI processing on-device, meaning tasks like computational photography and Gemini Live happen faster and with less reliance on a network connection.
Gemini Live itself is worth dwelling on, because it turns the phone into something closer to an always-available visual assistant, letting you point the camera at your surroundings and have a natural back-and-forth conversation about what it sees, which feels meaningfully different from tapping through menus.
The 6.3-inch Super Actua OLED display hits 3,300 nits of peak brightness, so reading the screen outdoors in direct sunlight stops being a frustrating experience, and the 120Hz refresh rate keeps scrolling and transitions feeling fluid regardless of what you are doing.
Build quality matches the ambition, with durable aluminium framing and Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the back meaning the phone can survive the kind of daily contact that would leave cheaper handsets visibly worse for wear.
The Pixel 10 Pro is a strong fit for anyone who wants Google’s best camera and AI experience without paying the full flagship price, and at $969 this is the most accessible that combination has been since launch.
SQUIRREL_13890777
The RAMpocalypse continues. Microsoft just revealed across the entire Surface line of products, . The updated pricing has already hit the official Microsoft Store, with other retailers expected to follow suit in the near future.
These are fairly significant upticks. For instance, the base model 15-inch Surface Laptop 7 now starts at $1,600. It cost $1,300 when the laptop was first released back in 2024. It did receive a price increase last year to $1,500, so today’s increase tacks on another $100.
The cost balloons even further when upgrading components, as a top-end Laptop 7 with a Snapdragon X Elite, 64GB of RAM and 1TB of SSD storage now costs a whopping $3650. As a comparison, a 16-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 Pro, 64GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD comes in at $3,300, and the .
Microsoft
This trend continues with the Surface Pro line of hybrid computers. The 12-inch Surface Pro starts at $1,050, after launching at just $800. The flagship 13-inch Surface Pro cost $1,000 in 2024 and now starts at $1,500. That’s a $500 increase in just two years, though the base hard drive did get a bit bigger.
These price increases are, of course, being blamed on generative AI’s penchant for . “Due to recent increases in memory and component costs, Surface is updating pricing on Microsoft.com for its current‑generation hardware portfolio,” Microsoft wrote in a statement.
Industry reports that the company is currently readying refreshes across the Surface line. It’s highly likely these new prices if component prices don’t decrease.
These aren’t the due to AI. Motorola recently instituted increases that even . Samsung has also pushed up the cost for its .
The PS5 when compared to the 2020 launch price, though Sony didn’t explicitly blame these increases on RAM, but rather “continued pressures in the global economic landscape.” There are also rumors that the continued RAM shortage has made it difficult for and likely pushed back the release of the .
There was a time, not terribly long ago, when manual transmissions were everywhere. In fact, back in the 1980s, ’90s, and even into the 2000s, manual transmissions were standard equipment on many of the new vehicles sold in North America. This was true not just on inexpensive economy cars or high-performance sports cars — but on family sedans, pickup trucks, and SUVs as well. While stick shifts are enjoyed by car enthusiasts today, opting for a manual used to be something mainstream auto buyers did just to save money on their purchase or perhaps to get a bit better fuel economy. That’s not the case anymore.
Today, the decline in manual offerings is well known, with what seems to be an ever-dwindling list of new vehicles available with a stick shift and a clutch pedal. As you’d expect, with the manual transmission very much becoming a niche option for drivers, the vast majority of today’s manual offerings come on enthusiast-oriented sports cars, hot hatchbacks, and muscle cars.
So what about manual SUVs? While SUVs and crossovers dominate the sales charts overall, you’ll need to search far and wide for a manual-equipped SUV on a dealer lot, with just two models currently offering buyers the option of a stick shift. Those two models are the Ford Bronco and Jeep Wrangler, both of which are adventure-oriented 4x4s, rather than mainstream family SUVs. Even on these models, manuals are only found on certain trim levels and with certain engines.
SUVs with manual transmissions are rare breeds
With their iconic names and rugged body-on-frame construction, the Ford Bronco and Jeep Wrangler make sense as the only two SUVs available with a manual transmission. Both 4x4s are offered in two or four-door body styles, and both have removable tops and doors for an open-air adventure experience. A manual simply makes them that much more fun.
However, you can’t simply add the manual option to any Bronco or Wrangler model. The Bronco offers an available seven-speed manual transmission — which is technically a six-speed with an extra crawler gear — but only on models powered by the base 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder engine. The more powerful EcoBoost V6-powered Broncos are automatic only.
The Jeep Wrangler is available with a few different powerplants, including a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder and a 6.4-liter HEMI V8. However, Jeep’s six-speed manual is only available on Wranglers powered by the 3.6-liter naturally aspirated V6. For a time, the Wrangler’s V6 engine was actually manual-only, though Jeep recently brought back the V6-automatic combo following customer demand.
There is some evidence more stick shift SUVs are on the way
There’s one more new vehicle sold with a manual transmission that deserves an honorable mention here, and that’s the Toyota Tacoma — which was as of this writing the only pickup truck sold in the United States with a manual transmission. While it’s, of course, an open-bed pickup rather than an SUV, a Tacoma with a camper shell is the closest you can get to having a new Toyota SUV with a stick shift. Despite having a similar powertrain and essentially being the Tacoma’s SUV counterpart, the Toyota 4Runner is only available with an automatic.
Toyota has said that there’s low demand for a manual 4Runner, yet there’s also some evidence that the manual transmission has been undergoing a bit of a resurgence as drivers look for an extra connection between them and their vehicles. So, is it possible that we could see other manual-equipped SUVs joining lineups in the future?
Subaru recently generated some speculation by asking its buyers if they’d be interested in a new, manual Subaru SUV. The company had previously offered its Crosstrek CUV with a manual, but the stick shift was cut from the option sheet for 2024. Whether or not Subaru’s interest pans out into an actual product remains to be seen, but manual lovers can at least have some optimism for the future. Until something else comes to the market, though, SUV buyers who desire a manual will have to make do with a Bronco or Wrangler.
There’s a reason almost every driver you know has a story of pothole frustration. It’s because it’s largely inevitable that you’ll fall victim to one somewhere at some point. What’s important, though, is what you do next. When our cars bump a curb or take a small jolt from a pothole, sometimes it seems so minor that we just grit our teeth and go about our day. Bear in mind, though, that you may not have gotten off as easily as you first thought.
The fact that you felt only a minor impact doesn’t necessarily mean that your vehicle hasn’t sustained damage. If it has, it’s vital to determine what’s happened and what needs to be done next. This can prevent worse harm being done to the vehicle, as well as keep you and other drivers safe. There are also potential ways to secure compensation for the damage done by a pothole, if you know the avenues you can try to take and the time frame you have to do so.
There are some things you can do in the immediate aftermath of hitting the pothole, while there are others that are jobs to be done in the days and weeks ahead. In either instance, though, as they’re such a ubiquitous threat on the roads, all drivers should know what to do after striking a pothole.
Pull over and check your vehicle
Of course, any time your vehicle takes a bump or a ding, all kinds of things immediately run through your mind. The first step is to pull over as soon as possible to determine what you’re dealing with. After all, it may be dangerous to drive any further. Even if that’s not the case, your vehicle may require prompt service.
There are some immediate signs of major damage, such as buckling of the wheel arches, that will tell you that you need to see a mechanic ASAP after the pothole encounter. It’s also important to keep in mind that you may have been driving when visibility was poor, such as in the dark, so it definitely pays to have a flashlight in your vehicle as part of your emergency kit for these sorts of situations.
You should take your time to thoroughly inspect your vehicle. If you’re not a mechanic who’s experienced with all the subtle yet important signs, the first thing to ascertain is that there hasn’t been catastrophic damage to the underside of your vehicle.
It may not even be something visible. Have a careful listen for escaping gas or any sounds that your vehicle wasn’t making before, which could indicate suspension damage or similar. It may well be a case for a mechanic, and the more information you can give them about any changes to your vehicle afterward, the better they’ll be able to diagnose and resolve problems.
Report the offending pothole
After you’ve determined that your vehicle hasn’t been damaged (or arranged proper care if it unfortunately has), your next priority should be reporting the troublesome pothole in question. To do so, you’ll first need to find out which body is responsible for that particular road.
State highways, etc., are typically administered by the state’s Department of Transportation. If on a California highway, for instance, you can use the Caltrans Division of Maintenance Customer Service Request form, which allows users to identify a pothole using a drag-and-drop pin-on-a-map graphic. As Texas’s own Department of Transportation notes, though, other roads, such as those within a city’s boundaries, are that city’s responsibility, not the state’s. Of course, these authorities usually have huge areas to maintain and significant backlogs of other repairs and improvements to make, so there’s no telling how long it may take for the repair to ultimately be made.
Still, you’re raising critical awareness about the issue, and that could save many tires and suspensions from needless extra strain or damage. On top of that, such reports can also serve as important evidence should a motorist seek compensation from the relevant authority for damage caused to their vehicle. This is because, as CNN Legal Analyst and Atlanta attorney Cody Randall put it in an Instagram post on the matter, “the city or the county, whoever’s maintaining that road, has to have knowledge that the defect exists and an opportunity to remediate it” for them to be found liable for damage caused by a pothole.
Consider making a claim for the damage your vehicle has sustained
As the Los Angeles Times reported in 2024, 44 million drivers in the United States had their vehicles damaged by potholes in 2023. Looking a little further back, the American Automobile Association reported that pothole damage had cost the country’s drivers approximately $26.5 billion in total in 2021.
Compensation claims can be made if you act quickly. The time limit is up to 90 days after the collision in New York City, for instance, potentially differing a lot by location, though successfully receiving compensation for it is another matter. The onus is on the driver to demonstrate irrefutably that the responsible body was not taking care of the road as they should. This is why those who hit potholes should take the time to take photographs of the section of road, the pothole itself, their vehicle, and any damage.
Be prepared to have little success with your claim. In fact, the Michigan Department of Transportation notes that “the majority of damage claims are denied under governmental immunity laws.” While Michigan law says that government agencies must “maintain the highway in reasonable repair,” defining a failure to do so is a tricky matter. As CNN Legal Analyst and Atlanta attorney Cody Randall explained on Instagram, counties and states often have “sovereign or qualified immunity,” which means, in effect, “you actually have to ask them for permission to sue them,” and they must choose to allow it.
Determine whether your existing insurance coverage will help you
If you determine that your chance of receiving compensation from the local authorities is low, there’s another course of action that could help: Your existing car insurance. As State Farm reports, “pothole damage is usually covered with collision coverage, minus the deductible,” the latter typically being up to around $1,000. After a quote for the price of a repair, you might find that you’d end up parting with more money in the long run by taking this route.
The Insurance Information Institute clarifies that adding collision coverage to a standard policy can cover the driver against impacts from potholes or other similar road hazards, though “it does not cover wear and tear to a car or its tires due to bad road conditions.” Such conditions often come hand in hand with potholes because of the way they form (rain freezing in existing cracks in the road expands and causes them to become larger), which also contributes to spring being the absolute worst time for potholes. A driver must prove that it was a collision with a pothole that caused the damage to get their insurance to pay out.
An additional complication to keep in mind is that your no-claims status may also be at stake from using it. All in all, as is so often the case with auto insurance, there’s a lot that needs to be considered prior to any claim. It can be important to avoid cheap car insurance to ensure your coverage is comprehensive, should it be needed for reasons like this.
Check your tire warranty
Claims, whether through your personal vehicle insurance or for compensation from the relevant body, may be a non-starter. They may also result in lots of paperwork and evidence-gathering that adds up to much more time and/or money spent than the payout would ultimately be worth. There’s something much less time-consuming that you can consider first, though: Check the warranty on your tires.
According to Edmunds, road hazard coverage can be added to a typical tire warranty to cover dangerous objects that could be on the road and potentially puncture a tire. Without this addition, the warranty will typically only be applicable for manufacturing defects, not accidental damage. This is why the road hazard add-on could be valuable, but it certainly doesn’t simply mean a free tire in every case. Additional fees, such as those for road hazard coverage on an additional tire, may also be added to the bill you end up receiving. The circumstances, the type of tire, and the damage it sustained are important to consider.
Ultimately, a driver has several options available to them if they hit a pothole, and while each incident will be different and have different effects, the immediate priority is damage control. Often, the aim is to recoup as much of the expense as possible in the circumstances, which is a result in itself and better than not getting anything back at all.
YouTube announced this week that it will now hold back ads during livestreams if chat engagement is at its peak, and if users show support with Super Chat, Super Stickers, or gift purchases. Until now, the only way to avoid seeing ads was by paying for a YouTube Premium subscription.
The Google-owned platform said in a blog post that when a chat explodes with energy, it wants to “protect that collective vibe.” When YouTube’s system recognizes that engagement is high, the platform will automatically hold back ads for everyone.
The idea behind this change is to help creators maintain momentum for viewers without interruptions from ads, the company says.
On the other hand, when a fan shows support with a Super Chat, Super Stickers, or gifts, they will be rewarded right away with a personal ad-free window right after their purchase. For context, Super Chat allows viewers to pay to highlight their messages, while Super Stickers are images that users can purchase to make their messages stand out in chats.
YouTube announced these changes alongside other updates for live creators. The company shared that more creators around the world are now eligible to receive gifts from viewers, as gifts are now live in Canada, Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, Australia, and New Zealand.
Additionally, viewers can now send GIFs on creators’ horizontal livestreams, not just vertical ones, directly from their mobile devices.
YouTube also announced that creators can now go live in both vertical and horizontal formats at the same time, with all viewers being able to connect in a single shared chat. The company says over 30% of live watch time in the U.S. came from connected TVs in 2025, which is why it wants creators to be able to customize their streams for all sorts of screens.
Techcrunch event
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
The move comes a few days after YouTube raised subscription prices for YouTube Premium in the U.S. The YouTube Premium individual plan is increasing from $13.99 to $15.99 per month, while the family plan is going from $22.99 to $26.99 per month.
Last year, Samsung introduced its first Micro RGB TV, but that model was only available in a massive 115-inch size and had an equally enormous price tag of $27,000. For 2026, it unveiled two ranges — the R85H and R95H — with sizes between 55 and 100 inches, and prices starting at a much more reasonable $1,600.
Why are these called Micro RGB TVs? Firstly, they’re LCD TVs, like most of Samsung’s lineup, but the key difference here is that they use a different backlighting system. Where most LCD TVs use a specialized filter to generate colors, the premium R95 and more affordable R85 models use clusters of red, green and blue micro LEDs to either replace or augment the filters.
Read more: Best TVs for 2026: Expert Tested and Reviewed
Samsung says the R95H hits 100% of the BT.2020 color area, which is more colors than most TVs could ever hope for. Yet, having seen this TV, and others that make the same claim, I don’t think it’s all that important. At least, not right now.
The competing TVs I’ve witnessed hitting this number have had a lot of colors, yes, but accuracy has been reduced in the process, even according to each company’s own test data. It’s more vital that a TV reproduce the color that’s present in the content you’re watching, rather than invent a whole new one. It’s worth adding that the TVs typically hit these numbers in Vivid mode, which is notorious for being cartoonishly bright and colorful.
The Samsung R95H is the company’s high-end Micro RBG TV.
A much more compelling feature of these TVs, however, is their use of Samsung Glare Free technology, which is designed to virtually eliminate reflections from windows or overhead lights on the screen. I’ve seen it in person, and it’s one of the best antireflective systems out there.
The TVs will also be capable of displaying Samsung’s own answer to Dolby Vision 2: HDR10 Plus Advanced, though it’s yet to be seen if this format will be supported through content.
The TVs are designed for gaming, too, and have dedicated gaming modes. For smooth movement, they include Samsung’s own Motion Xcelerator 165Hz and Motion Xcelerator 144Hz tech, on the R95H and R85H, respectively.
The R95H is compatible with the Wireless One Connect box if you want to keep your sources and TV separate. Both TVs come with the new Slim Fit Wall Mount, which allows access to existing ports with a hinge at the top of the TV.
As with most of the TVs announced at CES, these models have a plethora of AI modes, from the image and audio processors to the onboard chatbots from either Microsoft Copilot or Perplexity. Two of the most notable modes are AI Soccer Mode Pro (which can make the World Cup look like a video game) and AI Sound Controller Pro, which can amplify or cut different parts of the soundtrack, such as sound effects or dialogue.
While a 130-inch R95H was announced at CES, the company has yet to detail any pricing or availability for that model.
At a briefing earlier this year, I got a look at a preproduction version of the R95H, and Samsung representatives told me that the OLED TVs were still the best choice for picture quality, while the Micro RGBs were better for brightness and color. With their antireflective coatings and gaming features, I can see that these TVs will be popular with console gamers, especially.
However, Samsung is not the only manufacturer to announce Micro RGB TVs for 2026, and it’s harder to find one that isn’t. While I’m skeptical about the benefits of hitting 100% of BT.2020, this is a factor I’ll test when I get my hands on compatible models.
The R95H and R85 are available now:
- 85-inch R95H: $6,500
- 75-inch R95H: $4,500
- 65-inch R95H: $3,200
- 85-inch R85H: $4,000
- 75-inch R85H: $2,800
- 65-inch R85H: $2,100
- 55-inch R85H: $1,600
Verdict
Samsung’s first ‘affordable’ Micro RGB TV confirms the technology has a bright future
-
Unprecedented colour response
-
Uncompromising Filmmaker Mode
-
Exceptional backlighting
-
No Dolby Vision support
-
Slight motion blur
-
Expensive for an LCD TV
Key Features
-
Micro RGB screen
Replaces the traditional white or blue light shone through colour filters LED TV approach with tiny, separate red, green and blue LEDs
-
Up to 8 HDMI inputs
You can buy an optional Wireless One Connect box for the set that adds another four that send picture and sound to the TV wirelessly
-
Tizen smart system with AI
Comprehensive collection of streaming apps and lots of AI support for content searching and learning your viewing habits
Introduction
Having dipped a (very big) toe into Micro RGB technology waters towards the end of 2025 with an ultra-expensive 115-inch model, Samsung has now followed that up with the much more affordable (though still premium) R95H TV series.
Does the technology still feel as exciting and cutting edge on smaller, more affordable screens? And is the huge colour gamut it’s capable of delivering really worth worrying about?
Price
The 75R95H costs £4299 in the UK, and $4499 in the US. The 65-inch model that’s also available from the range’s launch goes for £3399 and $3199.
This means Samsung is pitching the R95H range below – albeit only slightly – its flagship S99H OLED TVs. Though the closest screen size to the QE75R95H in the S99H range is two inches bigger.
While this shows that Samsung sees its QD OLED TVs as the absolute pinnacle of its TV performance, the still-premium pricing of the R95H series suggests Samsung believes Micro RGB capable of doing some pretty special things.
Design
- Slender sides and rear
- Centrally mounted stand with floating effect
- Anti-reflection screen and Art Store create an artwork effect
The R95H has no truck with the wide frame Samsung added to the S99H OLED series. In fact, both the R95H’s screen frame and rear are exceptionally slim by LCD TV standards.
This makes it a great all hanging option – thoughh it actually ships with a desktop stand. This stand slots without screws into to grooves near the centre of the bottom edge, meaning the TV can be placed on even quite narrow bits of furniture. The neck of this stand wears a mirrored finish that creates the optical illusion that the screen is somehow just hovering above the base plate.
The TV carries well defined and extensive cable channelling on its rear panel to try and stop dangling cables from spoiling the 75R95H’s minimalist chic. Though actually, in a highly unusual move, it’s possible to connect four sources to the TV without any cabling if you add one of Samsung’s new, optional Wireless One Connect boxes to the R95H.
This lets you attach up to four HDMI sources to it, and then broadcasts their pictures and sound wirelessly to the TV from potentially metres away.
One last unusual design feature is the 75R95H’s combination of Samsung’s digital store of digital art screensavers, and an extremely effective anti-reflection screen. Put these together and you can make the TV look like a painting when you’re not watching it.
Connectivity
- Wireless One Connect box option
- Four gaming-friendly HDMI 2.1 ports as standard
- Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and Airplay 2 support
I’ve already obliquely covered the R95H’s main connection story: Its potential for adding an optional Wireless One Connect Box. This warrants further attention, though, for as well as opening up the potential for cable free connection of up to four external sources to the TV, it also opens up the possibility of the QE75R95H taking in as many as eight HDMI sources at once.
The four HDMI ports built into the R95H’s bodywork and the four on the optional Wireless One Connect box are all fully HDMI 2.1 specified – something I’ll come back to in the Gaming section.
The Wireless One Connect hosts a couple of USB ports too, again doubling the number of those available.
There are also optical digital audio outputs on the TV and Wireless One Connect box, while the TV’s own ‘built in’ wireless capabilities include Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and AirPlay 2.
User Experience
- Tizen OS smart system
- Voice and Gesture control
- Two remote controls
The Tizen OS that provides your main interface with the R95H’s smart features is pretty effective. The appearance of the home screen has been improved by shifting the usual roster of sub-menu links from down the side to along the top of the screen, and Samsung has also added a new AI home menu accessed via a direct button now included on the smart remote control.
This AI menu provides manual access to the third-party Co-Pilot and Perplexity AI systems, as well as a Generative AI image creation system that lets you create your own images from a few prompts.
The R95H’s extensive use of AI extends to its support for both the Bixby and Alexa voice recognition systems, and impressively sophisticated tools for coming up with relevant content recommendations based on your viewing habits. This can include the viewing habits of other members of your household, too, thanks to the TV supporting multiple individual user profiles.
Tizen carries a huge array of apps and streaming services, including the individual catch up apps for the UK’s main terrestrial broadcasters. Though there’s no support for Freely ‘wrappers’ carried by some rival brands these days.
The R95H ships with two remote controls: One traditional button-heavy one, and a much more slender affair with a stripped back button count and a solar panel on its rear that means you’ll never have to change its batteries again. This ‘smart’ remote also carries a built-in mic and Samsung’s new AI button when the other remote doesn’t, so all in all I’m confident this smart remote will be the one most users stick with.
The R95H can also be controlled to some extent via gestures if you’re wearing a Samsung Galaxy Watch, or you can add the TV to Samsung’s SmartThings app for iOS and Android devices, and then control it from your phone via a ‘virtual remote’
The sophistication of the R95H’s Tizen OS makes it a little intimidating initially, but after exploring it for a little while you start to appreciate its depths. Its biggest flaw, ultimately, is its desire to get you to accept adverts on the UI. You can opt out of these during the initial install, but if you do the basic layout of the UI remains unchanged, leaving areas where ads might have appeared often feeling like a fairly substantial waste of space.
Features
- Micro RGB panel
- Local dimming
- Dedicated Micro RGB AI processor
The R95H is the second TV Samsung has released to use Micro RGB technology. This new tech, which is set to appear in 2026 from other brands too, under different names such as RGB LED, Mini RGB and True RGB, replaces conventional LCD TV lighting systems, which shine white or blue lights through colour filters, with dedicated red, green and blue LEDs.
This an approach which has the potential to greatly increase colour gamuts, colour volumes (colour plus brightness), power efficiency and general brightness
The Micro RGB lights on the QE75R95H are working within a VA type of panel, backed up by a potent local dimming system. In the QE75R95H’s case this local dimming zone system operates across a commanding 1792 individually controlled LED clusters. On top of this, of course, there’s the extra dimming effect you can get from each red, green and blue LED.
Samsung has created a dedicated Micro RGB AI processing system for its new screen technology to, among other things, drive the backlighting system, deliver high-level upscaling of HD sources, and apply the huge colour gamut the screen can provide to real-world content.
The R95H supports the HDR10, HLG and HDR10+ HDR formats, and will eventually, following a firmware update later this year, support the new HDR10+ Advanced format (designed to take on the recently announced Dolby Vision 2 format) by boosting brightness, cloud gaming, motion and the approach the TV takes to different content genres. As ever with Samsung TVs, the R95H doesn’t support Dolby Vision in either of its formats.
Gaming
- Up to 165Hz frame rate support
- VRR support including AMD FreeSync
- Game Hub source screen and dedicated Game menu screen
The R95H leaves no stone unturned on the gaming front. For starters all four onboard and all optional Wireless One Connect HDMI ports support high frame rates for gaming up to 165Hz. They also all support variable refresh rates right across its frame rate range, with the VRR support encompassing the AMD FreeSync Premium Pro format.
Auto low latency support enables the R95H to automatically switch to its Game mode, in which mode the time the screen takes to render graphics drops to 10.4ms. Slightly higher than the S99H OLED, but not by enough for even the most competitive gamer to notice.
Where lag might become an issue, though, is if you’ve connected your console or PC to one of the HDMI inputs on an optional Wireless One Connect Box. The wireless transmission process associated with these boxes adds just under 20ms extra lag time.
The R95H helpfully organises all of your game sources, be they connected by HDMI or streamed via the many cloud gaming services Samsung support, onto a dedicated Game Hub home screen within the Tizen OS GUI, and also calls up a dedicated gaming menu if you press and hold the play button on the remote while playing a game.
This menu provides detailed information on the incoming gaming feed, and provides a host of cheats – sorry, gaming aids – such as mini map zooming, brightening dark areas so enemies are easier to spot, calling up an onscreen crosshair, and calling in different levels of motion smoothing for those (increasingly rare) occasions where you find yourself playing a low frame rate game.
As a tasty prelude to the video picture quality we’re going to cover in the next section, gaming on the Samsung R95H is a mostly a fantastically fun but also seriously immersive experience. The huge colour vibrancy the Micro RGB screen can achieve (I measured almost 150% of the DCI-P3 colour spectrum) together with brightness that hits peaks as high as around 2200 nits, results in colours that explode off the screen, making titles as varied as Crimson Desert, Forza Horizon and Rayman Legends look radiantly engaging to a degree they’ve seldom looked before.
HDR titles are handled well, with the screen doing a good job of optimising game HDR engines to its capabilities without the results looking clipped or unstable, and gaming feels responsive via the TV’s built-in HDMI ports.
My only gripes with gaming are that blooming around stand-out bright objects seems a little more noticeable if you’re sat off to the side of the screen than it does with video, and that fast pans and rapidly moving objects can look a touch soft compared with the S99H. Though they do look equally fluid.
Picture Quality
- Remarkable colour range
- High brightness
- Excellent backlight controls
While we’ve become pretty accustomed now to TVs that push brightness far beyond the levels commonly used by content creators, doing the same thing for colour is for me much more noticeable – and, therefore, trickier to do convincingly.
Samsung’s Micro RGB AI processor, though, makes a remarkably good job of it. Especially considering it’s dealing with such a new technology.
Starting with just how aggressively the R95H leans into Micro RGB’s wider colour gamut capabilities, measurements taken using Portrait Displays’ Calman Ultimate software, G1 signal generator and C6 HDR5000 light meter reveal that the screen can deliver essentially 150% of the DCI-P3 colour range. An unprecedented figure that at least some of Samsung’s picture presets seek to venture into when showing today’s more constrained HDR images.
The Dynamic preset really goes for it, and is worth checking out for the fullest evidence of the sort of spectacle Samsung’s TV can deliver. While this mode is surprisingly even-handed in how it expands colours across the spectrum, and how little noise it suffers with compared with some rival similar modes I’ve seen on some early Micro RGB/Mini RGB samples, it still looks forced sometimes, particularly when it comes to skin tones.
The Standard preset, while certainly not measuring accurately, is for the most part a joy to watch. I watched multiple favourite 4K Blu-ray test discs in this default mode (having turned off the interfering Eco and ambient sensor-related modes) and for most of the time was both dazzled by seeing such familiar titles looking like they’d been remastered in some new next-gen HDR format, and amazed at how well this ‘expansion’ of their native images had been achieved.
Especially when it came to avoiding such potentially distracting nasties as exaggerated colour noise, certain tones suddenly jumping out of the picture more than others, and saturations so extreme that the screen is no longer able to express the sort of subtle colour blends required to make objects feel three-dimensional and natural.
Just as importantly as the spectacular but surprisingly authentic feeling colours to the Standard mode’s appeal is the prowess of the Samsung R95H’s backlight system. The more than 1700 local dimming zones in the QE75R95H’s screen together with the extra light control created by using separate red, green and blue LEDs for each lighting ‘unit’ creates light control mechanics which, under the watchful eye of Samsung’s dedicated Micro RGB processor, deliver both fantastically deep black colours by LCD TV standards, but also impressive stability and freedom from either general clouding and backlight blooming around stand-out bright objects.
What’s more, even when a little blooming can occur around extremely bright, colourful objects, unlike normal LED TVs the blooming actually adopts the chief colour tone of the ‘offending’ object. This makes it much less noticeable than the usual grey blooming effect, as your eye more often than not perceives the bloom as natural colour radiance.
Making the capabilities of the backlight controls even more impressive is the fact that the R95H can deliver its deep black colours and clean local dimming effects despite it also being extremely bright.
Calman Ultimate tests reveal brightness peaks of nearly 2300 nits on 10% and more than 660 nits on full 100% light windows, which contributes to an outstanding HDR sensation in terms of baseline brightness and the intensity of classic HDR highlights like sunlight reflecting on glass or metal, or bright streetlights against a night sky.
This impressive brightness doesn’t remotely start to overwhelm the screen’s huge colour capabilities. In fact, far from any tones looking faded or pallid in bright areas, the screen delivers huge levels of colour volume that complete the sense that RGB TVs are in a world of their own where colour is concerned.
Exciting though all of this is, many home cinema fans will still want the QE75R95H to be able to handle movies in a much more ‘as the director intended’ fashion as well, at least for serious film nights.
As with its S99H OLED flagships, Samsung has again managed to cater for this need much more successfully than we might have expected given the extravagant capabilities of the R95H’s screen. Right out of the box, the Filmmaker Mode achieves DeltaE 2000 average measurements with every Calman Ultimate HDR test I tried it with bar one below the 3.0 level beyond which deviations from industry standards might potentially be visible to the human eye. And even on that one test where it strays further than three, it only does so by a half mark.
Filmmaker Mode images inevitably look much less bright and much less vibrant than Standard mode, simply because sticking to today’s common mastering standards means using much less of what the screen can do. But this is as it should be – and the demands of switching into accurate settings don’t cause subjective viewing issues such as pale colour tones, heavily reduced backlight controls or poor dynamic peaking of bright light sources.
The R95H delivers SDR content in the Standard mode with just as much measurable and subjectively enjoyable precision, while again managing to drastically open SDR up in terms of brightness and colour in the Standard mode – and/or when using a pretty effective SDR to HDR conversion option – without the results looking gaudy.
Inevitably the R95H isn’t perfect. Sometimes the mostly excellent Standard mode can push skin tones, especially in dark scenes, too much, that they look too ripe. A slight pinkish tone can sometimes appear over bright shots in Standard mode too, and very occasionally subtle colour differences, especially over misty backgrounds, can become too overt.
Blooming around bright objects, while disguised by its colour component versus regular LED TVs, is present in a way it isn’t with OLED, and becomes slightly more noticeable if you’re watching the TV from an angle. The Standard mode can sometimes exhibit obvious baseline brightness ‘jumps’ during hard cuts between dark and light shots.
Motion looks slightly softer than it does on Samsung’s regular premium LCD TVs, as well as looking too smooth and noisy if you leave the Standard present’s default Picture Clarity settings in play.
Finally, while for the majority of the time I think most viewers in typical home viewing conditions will love the way the R95H’s anti-glare filter suppresses basically all reflections, it can flatten black levels a little in really extreme bright ambient light.
Upscaling
- Well controlled processing side effects
- Impressive, 4K-like sharpness and detail
- Good noise suppression
The potent, heavily AI-influenced processors in Samsung’s premium TVs over the past few years have consistently delivered some of the best upscaling around – a handy benefit, I suspect, of Samsung’s longer devotion to the 8K TV cause than any other brand.
This trend continues with the Micro RGB AI processor, happily, as the R95H turns HD and even SD into convincing 4K look-a-like territory when it comes to detailing and clarity, without exaggerating source noise or grain, or generating distracting side effects such as colour shift or haloing around hard object edges.
The fact that the upscaling holds up well on a screen as big as 75-inches underlines how effective Samsung’s processing is, too.
Sound Quality
- Object Tracking Sound works well
- Good power and soundstage creation
- Can struggle with sustained deep bass
For most of the time the R95H sounds good. Despite its slender bodywork, for starters, it manages to produce impressive volume levels capable of satisfying pretty substantial rooms. Especially as the sound is projected well beyond the TV’s physical extremities, creating a soundstage larger than even the 75-inch screen.
This large soundstage is exceptionally coherent, too, thanks to the ear-catching efforts of Samsung’s Object Tracking Sound system. Combining clever audio processing with a multi-speaker set up that places speakers all around the screen, OTS does a remarkably accurate job of placing key effects in the right place.
This applies to everything from dialogue to gunfire and engine noise from moving vehicles, and the number of objects that the OTS engine is capable of handling in any given scene is remarkable.
There’s a lovely crisp, clean but also rounded quality to the QE75R95H’s detailing, and shrill trebles sound controlled, even and free of warbling or buzzing distortions.
The R95H doesn’t quite hold it together at the low frequency end of the sound spectrum, though. Short, impactful bass sounds hit fine, but where there are longer, really deep and pressurised rumbles to handle the pair of dedicated low frequency speakers can descend into various distortions, including buzzing noise, crackling, and a general coarsening of the low frequency sound as the speakers try to push beyond what they’re really capable of achieving.
Should you buy it?
It delivers colours like you’ve never seen before
With a measured ability to cover nearly 150% of the DCI-P3 colour spectrum and nearly 95% of the most extreme BT2020 colour spectrum, and equipped with presets that actually venture into such colour extremes, the 75R95H can deliver some genuinely remarkable colour extremes
Content needs to catch up
While the 75R95H delivers an unprecedented LCD colour response, there’s no real content out there that can fully exploit such wide colour. Though Samsung’s processing does a very good job in some picture presets of mapping current pictures to the TV’s capabilities.
Final Thoughts
With the QE75R95H Samsung has not only proven that Micro RGB and similar technology is relevant even in a world where content doesn’t yet exist that could fully unlock its capabilities, it’s delivered a TV that also breaks new ground with its LCD backlight control and AI features.
And which does things in the colour department that even Samsung’s S99H OLED can’t but that’s not to say you should necessarily buy it over the S99H. There are also areas, inevitably, where the pixel-level light control of OLED remains unmatched.
But the fact that the 75R95H even stands as a credible alternative to a TV as brilliant as the S99H is an outstanding achievement for such a new technology.
How We Test
The R95H was tested over a period of 10 days in both dark test room and regular living room environments.
It was fed a wide variety of content, including console games, 4K Blu-rays, streams of various resolutions and HDR formats from all of the main streaming platforms, as well as broadcast tuner footage.
All of this content was watched on the 75R95H in both daylight and dark conditions, and we explored all of the TV’s many picture setting options to find the best set ups for both regular living room environments and blacked out home cinemas.
Finally, the Samsung 75R95H was tested for both SDR and HDR playback in multiple presets using Portrait Display’s Calman Ultimate software, G1 processor and a C6 HDR5000 colorimeter.
- Tested in dark and bright room settings
- Tested with real-world content
- Benchmarked with Portrait Displays’ Calman Ultimate Software, G1 signal generator and KC6 HDR5000 colorimeter
- Gaming input lag was measured with a Leo Bodnar signal generator
FAQs
The 75R95H supports HDR10, HLG, and HDR10+ right away, and the new HDR10+ Advanced system will be added via firmware update later in the year.
The QE75R95H uses Samsung Display’s second generation Micro RGB display, applied to a VA panel with more than 1700 local dimming zones.
Test Data
| Samsung QE75R95H | |
|---|---|
| Input lag (ms) | 10.4 ms |
| Peak brightness (nits) 5% | 2190 nits |
| Peak brightness (nits) 2% | 2000 nits |
| Peak brightness (nits) 100% | 654 nits |
| Set up TV (timed) | 360 Seconds |
Full Specs
| Samsung QE75R95H Review | |
|---|---|
| UK RRP | £4299 |
| USA RRP | $4499 |
| Manufacturer | Samsung |
| Screen Size | 74.5 inches |
| Size (Dimensions) | 1658.8 x 349.1 x 1019.2 MM |
| Size (Dimensions without stand) | 946.2 x 1658.8 x 29.8 MM |
| Weight | 30.1 KG |
| Operating System | Tizen |
| Release Date | 2026 |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 |
| HDR | Yes |
| Types of HDR | HDR10, HLG, HDR10+, HDR10+ Advanced |
| Refresh Rate TVs | 48 – 165 Hz |
| Ports | Four HDMI 2.1, two USB, Ethernet, RF input, optical digital audio output; (optional wireless One Connect box) – four HDMI 2.1 ports, two USBs, optical audio port, RF and satellite tuner inputs |
| HDMI (2.1) | eARC, ALLM, 4K/120Hz, VRR |
| Audio (Power output) | 70 W |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Apple AirPlay 2 |
| Display Technology | LCD |
The best Thai restaurants in Cambridgeshire as voted by readers
Wallasey and Birkenhead town halls ‘for sale’
TAO Token of Bittensor Tumbles by 20% Post Governance Conflict Triggers Sell-Off in Market
-
Politics4 days agoUS brings back mandatory military draft registration
-
Sports4 days agoMan United discover Nico Schlotterbeck transfer fee as defender reaches Dortmund agreement
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Veronica Beard
-
Tech7 days agoHow Long Can You Drive With Expired Registration? What Florida Law Says
-
Politics5 days agoMalcolm In The Middle OG Turned Down ‘Buckets Of Money’ To Appear In Reboot
-
Politics2 days agoWorld Cup exit makes Italy enter crisis mode
-
Crypto World5 days agoCanary Capital Files SEC Registration for PEPE ETF
-
Business4 days agoTesla Model Y Tops China Auto Sales in March 2026 With 39,827 Registrations, Beating Cheaper EVs and Gas Cars
-
Crypto World1 day agoThe SEC Conditionalises DeFi Platforms to Be Avoided for Broker Registration
-
Crypto World21 hours agoSEC Signals Exemption for Crypto Interfaces From Broker Registration
-
Crypto World6 days agoBitcoin recovers as US and Iran Agree a Ceasefire Deal
-
NewsBeat2 days agoPep Guardiola and Gary Neville agree over Arsenal title problem that benefits Man City
-
Business4 days agoOpenAI Halts Stargate UK Data Centre Project Over Energy Costs and Copyright Row
-
Business3 days agoIreland Fuel Protests Enter Day 5 as Blockades Spark Shortages and Government Prepares Support Package
-
Politics5 days agoLBC Presenter Mocks Trump Over Iran War Failures
-
Crypto World4 days agoFederal judge blocks Arizona from bringing criminal charges against Kalshi
-
NewsBeat3 days agoJD Vance announces ‘no agreement’ with Iran over nuclear weapons fear
-
Tech5 days agoA version of Windows 10 released a decade ago is now eligible for additional security patches
-
Business4 days agoIMF retains floor for precautionary balances at SDR 20 billion
-
Crypto World14 hours agoSEC Proposes Certain Crypto Interfaces Don’t Need to Register as Brokers
You must be logged in to post a comment Login