We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.
Ryobi is frequently cited as one of the best major power tools brands on the market, particularly when it comes to measuring the ratio of price-to-performance. Not only is the Ryobi One+ battery system robust and reliable, but the company’s catalog of both corded and cordless tools is absolutely massive, with over 300 products in the 18V class alone. On top of that, Ryobi is the official Home Depot-affiliated power tool brand, which is why you won’t find any of the green tools sold at Lowe’s or any other brick-and-mortar retailer. This affiliation gives the company a certain measure of credibility that’s hard to come by in many of the other value-oriented brands on the market.
Advertisement
Harbor Freight’s power tools fill a similar niche. They aren’t usually trying to outperform the top-of-the-line models from DeWalt, Makita, or Milwaukee, but many of them aim to offer an approximation of that performance at a fraction of the price. This is most apparent in the company’s premium Hercules power tools, which are generally higher quality than those in its Bauer line.
The tool lines of these two manufacturers aren’t sold in the same stores, but the companies trade blows in terms of specs and performance more often than you might think. Ryobi is considered the safer bet by many craftspeople, but there are several instances where you might be surprised to learn that Harbor Freight comes out on top. By comparing the specs of two similar tools from each brand, taking a look at their weighted customer review scores, and seeing what pros have to say about them, you can see that there are several Harbor Freight tools that are able to outperform their Ryobi counterparts in terms of raw power.
The Hercules lineup consistently hits well above its weight class in terms of design, power, and performance, but there are a handful of the brand’s power tools that are truly exceptional. These manage to hit high-end performance benchmarks while costing about half as much as other brands. One of the best examples of this is the Hercules 20V ½-inch Ultra Torque Impact Wrench (HCB85B2).
The closest Ryobi variation of this tool is the 18V One+ HP ½-inch High Torque Impact Wrench (PBLIW01B). This is a fairly powerful battery-powered wrench that offers four modes of control and up to 1,170 ft-lbs of breakaway torque. It retails for $219.00 and is well-loved by users, with a 4.9 out of 5 on the Ryobi site and a 4.8 on Home Depot. Even so, the Hercules has the same four control modes, three different speed modes, and also boasts an impressive 1,500 ft-lbs of breakaway torque, handily outperforming the Ryobi while also being cheaper, at just $189.99.
This tool has a 4.9 out of 5 on the Harbor Freight website, matching the customer review score of the Ryobi. There are dozens of reviews that specifically cite the tool’s build quality and power as reasons for their positive reviews. “I feel like I have to brace myself when I use this,” said one. “Maybe I just need to work on upper body strength, but the force is great.” Torque Test Channel did extensive testing on this tool as well, and found that it even outperformed several higher-end tools offered by premium brands like DeWalt and Milwaukee, sitting several slots above the Ryobi on the power scale.
Just about every craftsperson needs a good circular saw, but many might not know that the rear-handled worm-drive-style saws tend to be a lot stronger than the typical top-handled variety. Hercules makes one of these that dramatically outperforms Ryobi’s closest competitor.
Advertisement
One of the best circular saws that Ryobi has to offer is the 18V One+ 7 ¼-inch Circular Saw (PBLCS300B). This promises 325 cuts per charge (though the listing doesn’t specify battery capacity) and cuts at speeds up to 4,300 RPM. That’s a pretty potent little saw, and users seem to like it, giving it a 4.8 out of 5 on the Ryobi site and a 4.5 on Home Depot, where it retails for $129.00.
That said, it isn’t even close to the power offered by the Hercules 7 ¼-inch Rear Handle Circular Saw (HCB72B-1). This tool costs an extra $20, but it’s able to make up to 725 cuts per charge on a 12Ah battery and speeds up to 5,800 RPM. That’s a significant boost in power, making it outperform the Ryobi model.
The Hercules saw has 4.9 out of 5 on the Harbor Freight site. “I love the worm drive configuration and the hook,” one reviewer said. “It has plenty of power. I’ve run it for several days on one battery. It’s half the price of DeWalt or Milwaukee, but performs just as good in my opinion.” Pro reviewers seem to like the tool as well. “Hercules claims this saw can handle all grades of lumber, including the toughest hardwoods. They aren’t messing around,” said Tool Craze. “No doubt thanks to a strong high-performance brushless motor designed to chew up and spit out lumber.”
Advertisement
Hercules 20V ½-inch Drill/Driver (HCB91B)
One of the most important power tools in any collection has to be the basic drill. This is something that you’ll be using in nearly every project that you take on, so it makes sense that you’d want to make sure you get a good one. Fortunately, this is another area where Harbor Freight put a lot of effort into making a tool with fantastic performance.
The Hercules 20V ½-inch Drill/Driver (HCB91B) is just $69.99 and has 14 clutch settings, a two-speed transmission, and promises to drill up to 350 holes on a single charge. But most importantly, it has a brushless motor that promises up to 1,200 in-lbs of torque. That’s a lot of power for any standard drill, let alone a budget option. Meanwhile, Ryobi’s brushless 18V One+ HP ½-inch Drill Driver (PBLDD01B) goes for $99.99 at Home Depot. This has a lot of the same features, but it’s only able to generate a maximum of 750 in-lbs of torque. This is a huge difference in performance, making the Harbor Freight tool outshine Ryobi in both price and quality.
Advertisement
The Hercules has a 4.7 out of 5 on the Harbor Freight website. “This drill is solid, well-built, and powerful,” one reviewer wrote. “I was impressed with the quality of the materials used in its construction,” said another. It isn’t just customers who feel this way, either. Pros seem to like the drill as well. “It has specs that come out in a good place for a Pro-level compact drill,” said Pro Tool Reviews Editor in Chief, Kenny Koehler. “The design and specs are close enough to that DeWalt drill to make us wonder if Stanley Black & Decker might be manufacturing Hercules for Harbor Freight.”
Advertisement
Hercules 20V ½-inch Hammer Drill/Driver (HCB92B)
Those who are going to be working with a lot of masonry might need to get a hammer drill rather than the standard version. These produce percussive force in addition to rotation that allows the bit to penetrate materials like concrete, brick, and asphalt. Luckily, this is another tool that is exceptional in the Hercules line.
The Ryobi 18V One+ HP ½-inch Hammer Drill (PSHM02B) is a popular option that has some decent specs. It’s able to operate at speeds up to 1,700 RPM, can deliver up to 450 in-lbs of torque, and hammers at a rate of up to 27,200 BPM. That ain’t bad, which is why the tool has a 4.7 out of 5 on Home Depot. That said, the Hercules 20V ½-inch Compact Hammer Drill/Driver (HCB92B) outclasses it in every metric. It operates at speeds up to 2,000 RPM, can produce up to 1,200 in-lbs of torque, and hammers at rates up to 32,000 BPM.
This tool boasts a 4.8 out of 5 on the Harbor Freight site, and users seem to be particularly impressed by its reliability and power. “I use this drill on a daily basis,” said one reviewer. “I used this drill to core drill 12″ holes in storm sewer pipes. We also use it to mix up batches of mortar in 5-gallon buckets. I used other brand drills doing the same things, and they broke or burned out right away.” YouTuber Tool Review Zone did extensive testing on the drill as well. “This thing definitely stands on its own,” he said. “Even if this thing was priced a bit higher, this is still a legit buy. This is a well-built hammer drill and another really good job by Hercules.”
Advertisement
Hercules Compact Jobsite Blower (HC102B)
The quality of a jobsite blower can be measured in a few different ways. Weight, volume, and battery life can all contribute to a blower’s overall quality, but blowing power is measured by two separate metrics: volume and speed. The Ryobi 18V ONE+ HP Compact Blower (PSBLB01B) is a decently capable little tool that blows air at a volume of 220 CFM and at speeds up to 140 MPH, and retails for $109.00. The tool is quite popular, with a 4.8 out of 5 on the Ryobi site and a 4.7 out of 5 on Home Depot. Compare this to the Hercules 20V Compact Jobsite Blower (HC102B), though. This $44.99 tool blows 120 CFM at much higher speeds, reaching up to 200 MPH. This means that the Ryobi wins in terms of volume, which is better for sweeping wide areas and clearing dry leaves, but the Hercules is the superior tool when it comes to speed. This makes it better for tightly focused power, which is generally more ideal for shop environments and clearing stubborn, wet materials.
The Hercules blower has a 4.7 on the Harbor Freight site. “They weren’t kidding about how handy this is for shop and project cleanup,” one review stated. “No longer need to wait for air compressor pressure or use a much larger leaf blower. Surprisingly powerful for its size.” Pro reviewers have argued that the lightweight, small form factor, and power make it a really handy tool to keep in the shop. “This is a must-have tool,” said YouTuber Rural Minnesota Guy. “This, right now, I use all the time. Any time I get done with a tool, I blow it off. I clean up [my workbench]. It’s just really, really good.”
Advertisement
Our methodology
In order to compare the power levels of tools from different brands, we started by finding the Harbor Freight and Ryobi tools that were the most similar in terms of power source, design, fittings, and intended use. This is important in order to ensure that we are truly showcasing comparable products and not comparing dissimilar tools, like a drill to an electric screwdriver, for instance. We then examined each of these tools’ specs, specifically choosing examples where the Harbor Freight version of the tool advertised more power than the Ryobi alternative.
Advertisement
Once we had our tools picked out, we examined the customer reviews on each of the companies’ respective websites and then sought out professional reviews. This helped to verify that these tools stood up to real-world use and testing and that the power they demonstrated is in line with the specs reported by the manufacturer.
But once you’ve set up your device, Heatbit will track and file your mining revenue to your phone, even if you don’t yet have a bitcoin wallet set up. After you reach the transfer minimum of 100,000 satoshis, or one thousandth of one bitcoin ($66 at April 2026 prices), you can transfer this to your wallet and, presumably, spend it. Heatbit’s app is compatible with the Lightning networks and most major exchanges (Coinbase, Binance, OKX, BitFinex).
Unlike many air purifiers that activate only when there are air quality issues, the Heatbit continually pushes air through its HEPA filter while the miner and heater are active. While Heatbit recommends filter replacement once every six months, in practice, the app showed that the filter was being used up by about 1 percent a day. For whatever reason, my Heatbit app refused to believe that I was not in Seattle, and so my exterior air quality readings were all tied to King County, Washington.
Early quirks aside, the ease of onramp is admirable for a device not aimed at crypto-loving engineers. At current prices, if I run my heater/miner nonstop, this would net me about a $70 rebate on my heating bills once every two months. Pretty cool, right?
Why the Math on Heatbit Doesn’t Pencil
Heatbit via Matthew Korfhage
But here’s the problem with that math. I’d also need to pay at least $1,500 upfront (the current discounted price of the Maxi Pro) before I get access to these savings. This is about $1,350 more than the best space heaters I’ve tested. It’s also around $900 or $1,000 more than a combination purifier–heater from Dyson. So your money-saving math needs to take this upfront cost into account.
Advertisement
At this rate, assuming my energy costs and bitcoin prices stayed constant, it would take me between five and eight years to “make my money back” in bitcoin if I ran this thing 24/7 for four months a year. That’s on a device with a one-year warranty. (Heatbit’s founders say there has been a failure rate only in the “low single digits” after three years for the first-generation Heatbit Trio.)
These numbers assume I would otherwise run a space heater nonstop at full blast for months on end as a primary heat source—which is not how most people use space heaters. I tend to turn on a space heater only when I’m in a room, and direct it toward myself. For heating a whole house, natural gas or a heat pump are both far more cost-effective options, if available.
But let’s say you have only electricity for heat. And you would always be running a space heater. And let’s assume the Heatbit keeps running at the same efficiency for at least five years. Is the Heatbit now the best choice, economically? Well, still maybe not.
Every Crypto Miner Is a Heater
Every crypto mining device will heat your house, whether or not its makers advertise it as a space heater. Each miner will release heat with 100 percent efficiency, according to how much power it uses. That’s because one way or another, all power waste will eventually get converted to heat.
Advertisement
The most efficient combination space heater and bitcoin miner will always be the one that mines bitcoin most efficiently. At that point, you could just pick up a Canaan Avalon Q ($1,900) and get a 50 percent better hash rate and produce about the same amount of heat. Newfangled ASIC Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) miners might net you even better efficiency. Pretty much anything you use, with the same amount of power, will release this much heat.
The use of drones and autonomous vehicles is continuing to rise. In a military capacity, this has allowed people in the service to access areas that would otherwise be incredibly difficult and dangerous to reach. While the public may be more familiar with how the U.S. military is developing new ways to deal with drones on the battlefield, this idea pertains to the depths of the ocean, too. This is why the U.S. Navy is so interested in the capacities of the Dive-XL, an autonomous submarine developed by Anduril.
In April 2025, the U.S. Navy announced the beginning of its Combat Autonomous Maritime Platform program. Its aim is to find partners that can deliver an unmanned and autonomous vessel capable of diving as far as over 650 feet below the surface. The vessel should be sizeable-enough to have the ability to dispatch payloads at these considerable depths, and boast a range of around 1,000 nautical miles. It was specified, too, that this autonomous submarine should be capable of handling equipment of varying sizes. This is particularly important because the possible scope of such a vessel’s mission notably varies from reconnaissance to something considerably more offensive.
Advertisement
Anduril’s Dive-XL has been selected to fulfill this role. Stretching 27 feet long with a 7-foot beam, it’s far from the tiny, stealthy drone some militaries are so used to wielding in the air. Let’s see exactly why this sub might be so important to the future of naval warfare.
Advertisement
Why the Dive-XL sub could be right for the U.S. Navy
With a range of about 2,000 nautical miles and the capacity to reach depths of about 20,000 feet, the Dive-XL definitely meets the requirements established by the Combat Maritime Autonomous Platform. It’s also designed to support single, double, triple, and extended payload configurations with a modular body. Powered with an all-electric power train that allows for long missions without surfacing, the Dive-XL can serve a variety of missions. An overly-specialized machine can only suit a niche role, while something like the Dive-XL is more versatile.
It’s also designed to accommodate and deploy tech such as Anduril’s Seabed Sentry, which is essentially individual Lattice AI-enabled cogs in an underwater communication and surveillance network. It also works with the Copperhead drone, an autonomous weapon that can be equipped with an explosive and is available in different capacities. The latter was specifically built to be deployed by a system like Dive-XL.
Anduril boasts that the capacity to stay underwater for long periods using pure electric power dramatically boosts the model’s ability to “operate undetected, extend its range, and deliver payloads in contested maritime environments.” This, according to the manufacturer, will be key to performing its role in an environment, and in a future, where it is unlikely to be the only autonomous vessel of its type.
Advertisement
The practicality of deploying the Anduril Dive-XL
The U.S. Navy has wielded many deadly attack submarines, and this Anduril model will be a formidable, though far from conventional, addition to the ranks. The variable hull design will make it less costly as well as more versatile, all of which will help to accomplish the main goal of quickly accumulating an autonomous force that can dispense numerous drones. This can in turn ease the pressure on already-strained sailors of crewed vessels.
Anduril also claims that the system “enables warfighters to launch, employ, and recover the system flexibly at sea or ashore with minimal infrastructure and heavy equipment.” To help with that, it’s first got to be easy to get it to where it needs to be. That is why Anduril designed it to be launched and collected by ship or pier and transported via aircraft or truck. It can also be carried across water in a shipping crate.
Advertisement
There’s no doubt that drones and autonomous vehicles will be an increasingly prominent part of warfare and defense in the future. The U.S. Navy clearly considers Anduril’s Dive-XL to be a significant part of that equation, but how it will continue to evolve and which different functions it will be able to fulfill beneath the surface remain to be seen.
It’s a yearly delight to feel the weather warm up as spring approaches, but this season of renewal does come with some downsides. One of the most annoying and dangerous is the road pothole, which manifests itself as a small dent, a massive hole, or something in between on the roadway. These become especially frequent sights throughout the spring season, thanks largely to the transition from winter to spring. Temperatures going from freezing to warm and snow and ice melting into water, freezing, and remelting ultimately lead to potholes being a common issue.
The formation of a pothole begins with the accumulation and subsequent melting of snow and ice during winter. This water makes its way into the dirt below the pavement via small cracks and holes. Freezing temps then turn that water into ice, which expands to lift and move the soil around it. As a result, the pavement above moves around, too, and when that ice melts in the warming spring, it leaves weak spots in those areas. Combine this weakened state with frequent driving, and it’s only a matter of time before the pavement breaks apart into a pothole.
While the squiggly road lines known as tar snakes often prevent some potholes from forming, plenty manage to take shape all the same. Potholes can mean serious trouble on the road. That’s why it’s crucial to practice safe driving habits and even take action should you encounter them.
Advertisement
How to take action when potholes form
Mikhail Yakovlev/Getty Images
When potholes have formed on the road, it’s key to drive safely in their presence. It can be difficult to tell just how big and deep they are from the driver’s seat, and hitting potholes could mean a guaranteed trip to the mechanic, be it for new tires or suspension parts, so you want to exercise caution. Don’t drive right over them, skirt around them when you can, and if they’re bad enough, safely change lanes to avoid them if possible. If you have little choice other than to drive your vehicle over one, be sure to do so at a low speed to prevent unnecessary wear.
Once you’re off the road, you can still take action against the potholes in your area. While more often than not, towns and cities will eventually get around to filling potholes, especially those in traffic-heavy areas, sometimes those on side streets will be overlooked. Oftentimes, you can go online and bring awareness to them by filling out a pothole repair request form or using other methods to get in touch with those responsible for repairing them. Doing so will benefit your vehicle’s health in the long run and the wider community as well.
Advertisement
There is no shortage of dangers and obstacles on the road, but few are more jarring than the pothole. That’s why, as spring approaches, it’s in every driver’s best interest to be extra careful while driving and, if they feel strongly enough, speak up to get something done about them.
He’s Apple’s Chief Operating Officer who became the CEO — but he’s not Tim Cook. Instead, this was how Michael Spindler replaced John Sculley, and made himself ill trying to save the company in the 1990s.
Apple CEO Michael Spindler — image credit: Apple
Michael Scott was the first Apple CEO, brought in by Mike Markkula, who became the second CEO when Scott was shown the door. Markkula was then responsible along with Steve Jobs for recruiting John Sculley, until he was also shown the exit sign. But while it was Sculley who made Spindler Chief Operating Officer, and then it was the board that made him CEO, Markkula was again behind all of this. It was Markkula who recruited Spindler to join Apple in September 1980. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
When you step into the 2026 Mercedes EQS, you feel as if you’ve entered another dimension. Nothing connects the mechanical workings of the car anymore. Instead, you have a steering-by-wire system. This means that all of your steering wheel movements are detected by sensors and relayed to control units, which then instruct the actuators on how to make the wheels respond to your commands.
It operates just like a sports car with variable gear ratios that can change instantly based on the speed at which you travel. At low speeds, there is a faster reaction, which will be helpful if you need to maneuver quickly in and out of crowded places such as parking lots. High speeds ensure a smooth ride for you while you travel on highways. The whole system works automatically, with the software deciding what is necessary for you without requiring any interference from your side. This will ensure that the steering effort required is minimal since even slight adjustments will require little force.
MERCEDES-AMG PETRONAS F1 TEAM BUILDING SET – LEGO Speed Champions Mercedes-AMG PETRONAS F1 Team Race Car vehicle building set for boys and girls…
DRIVER MINIFIGURE – This car playset includes a driver minifigure wearing a Mercedes-AMG PETRONAS F1 Team outfit and a winged helmet for kids to…
AUTHENTIC DETAILS – The F1 race car features design details from the real-life 2024 version, including sponsor stickers and wider rear tires…
It’s also fascinating how the wheel’s design is actually rather flat compared to what you’d assume would be on a futuristic EV; it’s a yoked wheel with plenty of legroom and clear visibility of the screens on the dash board. You’ll find it easier to get into and out of the vehicle now too, while ngineers have even had to develop their own airbags for it, resulting in further safety safeguards.
Before deciding to put this technology into production, the development team tested it for approximately a million kilometers on real roads, proving grounds, and simulators. They’ve also added rear axle steering, which works in unison with the front system to make the car turn more tightly while remaining silky smooth at high speeds. Everything adds up to a combination that simply makes driving appear more pleasant and stable. [Source]
‘Dead game’ is a term thrown around loosely now. You’ll often hear players say it whenever a game drops a few spots in the Steam concurrent players chart, gets a bad balance update, or makes a change that angers the community. But that’s not what actually makes a game dead.
Dead games usually disappear twice. First when the players leave, and then again when people stop talking about them. The games on this list never really managed the second part.
Not all of these games are “dead” in the exact same way. Some are officially gone. Some are technically still playable but functionally abandoned. Some survive through tiny, stubborn communities that refuse to let go. But with the momentum gone and their future in question, all you’re left with is a strong sense of what could have been. And yet, I still miss them all.
Anthem
What was it about?
Advertisement
Anthem had one of the coolest core fantasies I have ever seen wasted. Flying around in a Javelin felt incredible. The movement had speed, weight, and that rare kind of freedom that instantly made you think, “Okay, this is the fantasy.”
Even now, when people talk about Anthem, that is usually the first thing they bring up. Not the loot. Not the missions. The flying.
Why did it fail?
Advertisement
Because everything around the power fantasy could not support it, Anthem’s trailer had many wondering if it was a narrative-driven story game, but it was released as a live-service game that never really understood the kind of game it wanted to be. The content loop was weak, the gameplay got repetitive fast, and the game never found the long-term support it needed to build on its best idea. Anthem is easy to remember because the foundation is so cool. Though it is a painful reminder that a concept alone is never enough.
Deceive Inc.
What was it about?
In a sea full of multiplayer shooters, Deceive Inc. felt genuinely fresh in a market that rarely rewards experimentation. The whole spy-social-stealth concept was clever, stylish, and different in a way that made it stand out immediately. It was a game with an actual personality instead of the usual formula that revolved around battle royales and hero shooters.
Advertisement
Why did it fail?
Players being clever isn’t always enough to survive. Deceive Inc. never felt like it found the player base it deserved. For multiplayer games, a bit of momentum and a dedicated community are what make it thrive. So once you lose both, recovery gets brutally hard. It also lived in that awkward space where people that played it often seemed to love the idea, but not enough people showed up to keep that idea alive. “How did it never catch on?” is the question we’ve been left with.
Gigantic
What was it about?
Gigantic was one of the best ‘Hero Shooters’ out there. It had style and substance. It looked alive in a way a lot of team-based multiplayer games never do. The art direction, character design, and scale of the matches were all expressive and full of energy. Apart from my uncontested favorite in the genre, this came as a close second. Even the remaster reminds people how distinct the game’s identity really was.
Advertisement
A hero and guardian in Gigantic: Rampage Edition.Gearbox Entertainment
Why did it fail?
Timing, support, and bad luck all seemed to work against it. Gigantic always came across as the game people admired, but from a distance. That is the cruel thing about games like this. A game can be original, stylish, and easy to root for, and the market can still shrug it off. Unfortunately, the Gigantic: Rampage Edition was a relaunch that aimed to bring back the interest, but people had already moved on, and as my friend once put it, “the spark is just not there anymore.”
Titanfall 2
What was it about?
Titanfall 2 is a game that still feels better than half the shooters that came after it. Even as gamers were complaining about the shifting focus of Call of Duty into a movement shooter, the fatigue of this meta helped create a game that leaned heavily into this. A game with in-depth movement mechanics and style. The movement was fast and fluid, the Titans added real spectacle, and the campaign had one of the best level designs of its era. To date, it feels like a game that people bring up with a mix of admiration and frustration since it got so much right.
Respawn Entertainment
Why did it fail?
While its story is a bit similar to the rest of the games on this list, the issues were more nuanced here. Respawn Entertainment released the game between two colossal video game franchise releases, which overshadowed it on launch. Its gruelling mechanics had many of the casual players quit in favor of simpler titles. What made matters worse was that the game was held hostage for years by hackers. There was no support from the studio, which shifted most of its focus to its real money-maker, Apex Legends.
Advertisement
Paladins: Champions of the Realm
Paladins is different from other games on this because I did not just admire it from a distance. I lived in it. I put nearly 3,000 hours into that game, hit the top ranks, and spent enough time with it to see both its brilliance and its mess up close. What made Paladins special was that it always felt more flexible, more chaotic, and honestly, more creative than people gave it credit for.
The champions had personality, the card and loadout system let you shape your playstyle in ways other hero shooters did not. The whole thing had scrappy energy that made it feel alive even when it was barely being held together. This game is also the reason I decided to make this list of all the great games we’ve lost.
Why did it fail?
Advertisement
Paladins was never allowed to be as great as it could have been. It was plagued by bugs, weird balancing, uneven support, and the constant uphill battle of living in the shadows of Overwatch. But what hurts that most is that Paladins did not die because nobody cared; it faded while people still cared. The small but strong community held out as Hi-Rez suffered from severe mismanagement. Over time, the controversial changes, lack of support, and bugs forced many players to quit.
(Shout out to GreatDivide for the Cassie clip.)
The game still gets around 2000 players on a good day, with the community supporting it and carrying it longer than most dead games ever get carried. All of these games stay with me for different reasons. Some were wasted potential. Some were mistimed. Some just never found enough people.
Advertisement
A dead game does not stay in your head this long, unless it got something very right.
A new report dubbed “BrowserGate” warns that Microsoft’s LinkedIn is using hidden JavaScript scripts on its website to scan visitors’ browsers for installed extensions and collect device data.
According to a report by Fairlinked e.V., which claims to be an association of commercial LinkedIn users, Microsoft’s platform injects JavaScript into user sessions that checks for thousands of browser extensions and links the results to identifiable user profiles.
The author claims that this behavior is used to collect sensitive personal and corporate information, as LinkedIn accounts are tied to real identities, employers, and job roles.
“LinkedIn scans for over 200 products that directly compete with its own sales tools, including Apollo, Lusha, and ZoomInfo. Because LinkedIn knows each user’s employer, it can map which companies use which competitor products. It is extracting the customer lists of thousands of software companies from their users’ browsers without anyone’s knowledge,’ the report says.
Advertisement
“Then it uses what it finds. LinkedIn has already sent enforcement threats to users of third-party tools, using data obtained through this covert scanning to identify its targets.”
BleepingComputer has independently confirmed part of these claims through our own testing, during which we observed a JavaScript file with a randomized filename being loaded by LinkedIn’s website.
This script checked for 6,236 browser extensions by attempting to access file resources associated with a specific extension ID, a known technique for detecting whether extensions are installed.
This fingerprinting script was previously reported in 2025, but it was only detecting approximately 2,000 extensions at that time. A different GitHub repository from two months ago shows 3,000 extensions being detected, demonstrating that the number of detected extensions continues to grow.
Advertisement
Snippet of the list of extensions scanned for by LinkedIn’s script Source: BleepingComputer
While many of the extensions that are scanned for are related to LinkedIn, the script also strangely detected language and grammar extensions, tools for tax professionals, and other seemingly unrelated features.
The script also collects a wide range of browser and device data, including CPU core count, available memory, screen resolution, timezone, language settings, battery status, audio information, and storage features.
Gathering information about visitors’ devices Source: BleepingComputer
BleepingComputer could not verify the claims in the BrowserGate report about the use of the data or whether it is shared with third-party companies.
However, similar fingerprinting techniques have been used in the past to build unique browser profiles, which can enable tracking users across websites.
LinkedIn denies data use allegations
LinkedIn does not dispute that it detects specific browser extensions, telling BleepingComputer that the info is used to protect the platform and its users.
However, the company claims the report is from someone whose account was banned for scraping LinkedIn content and violating the site’s terms of use.
Advertisement
“The claims made on the website linked here are plain wrong. The person behind them is subject to an account restriction for scraping and other violations of LinkedIn’s Terms of Service.
To protect the privacy of our members, their data, and to ensure site stability, we do look for extensions that scrape data without members’ consent or otherwise violate LinkedIn’s Terms of Service.
Here’s why: some extensions have static resources (images, javascript) available to inject into our webpages. We can detect the presence of these extensions by checking if that static resource URL exists. This detection is visible inside the Chrome developer console. We use this data to determine which extensions violate our terms, to inform and improve our technical defenses, and to understand why a member account might be fetching an inordinate amount of other members’ data, which at scale, impacts site stability. We do not use this data to infer sensitive information about members.
For additional context, in retaliation for this website owner’s account restriction, they attempted to obtain an injunction in Germany, alleging LinkedIn had violated various laws. The court ruled against them and found their claims against LinkedIn had no merit, and in fact, this individual’s own data practices ran afoul of the law.
Advertisement
Unfortunately, this is a case of an individual who lost in the court of law, but is seeking to re-litigate in the court of public opinion without regard for accuracy.”
❖ LinkedIn
LinkedIn claims the BrowserGate report stems from a dispute involving the developer of a LinkedIn-related browser extension called “Teamfluence,” which LinkedIn says it restricted for violating the platform’s terms.
In documents shared with BleepingComputer, a German court denied the developer’s request for a preliminary injunction, finding that LinkedIn’s actions did not constitute unlawful obstruction or discrimination.
Advertisement
The court also found that automated data collection alone could infringe upon LinkedIn’s terms of use and that it was entitled to block the accounts to protect its platform.
LinkedIn argues the BrowserGate report is an attempt to re-litigate that dispute publicly.
Regardless of the reasons for the report, one point is undisputed.
LinkedIn’s site uses a fingerprinting script that detects over 6,000 extensions running in a Chromium browser, along with other data about a visitor’s system.
Advertisement
This is not the first time that companies have used aggressive fingerprinting scripts to detect programs running on a visitor’s device.
While eBay never confirmed why they were using these scripts, it was widely believed that they were used to block fraud on compromised devices.
It was later discovered that numerous other companies were using the same fingerprinting script, including Citibank, TD Bank, Ameriprise, Chick-fil-A, Lendup, BeachBody, Equifax IQ connect, TIAA-CREF, Sky, GumTree, and WePay.
Advertisement
Automated pentesting proves the path exists. BAS proves whether your controls stop it. Most teams run one without the other.
This whitepaper maps six validation surfaces, shows where coverage ends, and provides practitioners with three diagnostic questions for any tool evaluation.
Satya Nadella in November 2016, in his honeymoon period as Microsoft CEO. (GeekWire File Photo)
[Editor’s Note: We’re excited to welcome Mary Jo Foley as a GeekWire contributor. Mary Jo has been one of the sharpest watchers of Microsoft for many years, currently as Editor in Chief at Directions on Microsoft, an IT planning and advisory service. She’ll be offering her take for GeekWire periodically on the latest developments in Redmond, starting with this piece.]
Reorgs are a way of life at Microsoft. But the pace of them over the last couple of months has led many to wonder what the heck is happening in Redmond — especially when coupled with the company’s stock price having its worst quarter in years.
During the past couple of months, Microsoft has made a noticeable number of organizational changes:
Is this just the usual Microsoft fiscal-year-end housekeeping, or is something different? A blip that will pass, or a new AI-centric reality for the Satya Nadella era?
It’s a mix of both, I’d argue.
The current wave of churn, at least in part, can be attributed to Microsoft’s corporate calendar. Its fourth quarter ends June 30 and new fiscal year kicks off on July 1. Microsoft often reorgs and does layoffs in the months leading up to this as a way to reset for the coming year.
Advertisement
The company also is taking actions to reduce hierarchy and make the corporate structure flatter, as are a number of tech companies, in the hopes of becoming nimbler.
A year ago, Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood proclaimed that Microsoft was “increasing our agility by reducing layers with fewer managers.” With moves like replacing 35-year veteran Executive Vice President Jha with a new gang of four, rather than just another single uber-boss, Microsoft is following through on those promises.
It’s not all mundane matters at play, however.
Thanks to AI, the way companies are prioritizing and following through on their strategies is different. Microsoft isn’t immune to the market’s jitters around capex overspending on AI when ROI still remains questionable. Its no-longer-exclusive partnership with OpenAI has people inside and outside the company worried, too, as does the fact that a whopping 45 percent of its unfulfilled Azure backlog last quarter was attributable to OpenAI.
Advertisement
Investor pressure on the company to keep its Azure business growing during a time of admitted capacity challenges also can’t be dismissed as contributing to the current churn. As a result, Microsoft travel budgets, new-hire spending, and investments in unproven areas are all on the chopping block.
Almost nothing (except towels, maybe) is immune from scrutiny with the goal of freeing up more dollars to pay for AI and cloud build-out.
But those reasons alone may not be enough to explain why Microsoft is looking like the least magnificent of the so-called Magnificent Seven tech leaders right now.
Microsoft continues to struggle in the consumer space, and not just with Xbox. Most of the company’s revenues have been and continue to be from sales to commercial customers. That consumer weakness is especially apparent when it comes to AI.
Advertisement
Microsoft recently disclosed only 3 percent of its Microsoft 365 customers are paying for Microsoft 365 Copilot. But its adoption rate for its consumer Copilot is even worse, and far lower than the rates for OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google Gemini.
Suleyman’s reassignment came later than some expected (and hoped), given the starts and stops with Microsoft’s consumer AI efforts. Mico, a ghost-like Clippy wannabe, seems to be in limbo. Microsoft’s push to make voice one of the main ways users interact with AI on their PCs, when people don’t talk to PCs like they do phones, seems to be falling flat.
Meanwhile, the Windows organization is trying to right the ship by backing out of some of its over-zealous AI plans. Instead of trying to force AI into Notepad and Photos, execs said they instead will focus on some top consumer requests, ranging from taskbar customization, to adding the ability to pause updates at will.
Advertisement
Microsoft shows no signs of giving up on the consumer space. Maybe new blood will find new ways to harness the company’s enterprise tactics to boost its consumer share? If not, there’s always the next reorg. …
A British political adviser’s stolen iPhone leads to a scandal, pro athletes fall for an iCloud scam, and iCloud evidence is used against a man accused of stalking the FBI director’s girlfriend, all in this week’s Apple Crime Blotter.
The Alderwood Apple Store in Washington. Image Credit: Apple
A study from researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and Georgia Tech shows that GDDR6-based Rowhammer attacks can grant kernel-level access to Linux systems equipped with GPUs based on Nvidia’s Ampere and Ada Lovelace architectures. The vulnerability appears significantly more severe than what was outlined in a paper last year. Read Entire Article Source link
You must be logged in to post a comment Login